Source: gcc-6-cross
Version: 12
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: xtables-addons
Version: 2.11-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: safecat
Version: 1.13-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: jasperreports
Version: 6.2.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: connman
Version: 1.32-0.1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: llvm-toolchain-3.5
Version: 1:3.5.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: bitz-server
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/b
Source: appstream-generator
Version: 0.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ruby-activerecord-deprecated-finders
Version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: konsole
Version: 4:16.04.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: colord
Version: 1.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: insighttoolkit4
Version: 4.10.0-dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: golang-golang-x-tools
Version: 1:0.0~git20160315.0.f42ec61-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64
Source: lcgdm
Version: 1.8.11-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: sagan
Version: 1.0.1-0.3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> check
Source: fflas-ffpack
Version: 2.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: dub
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/lib/
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 08:56:27AM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> please consider uploading the package in source-only form, [...]
FWIW: Soruce-only uploads are done with "dpkg-buildpackage -S".
You don't need any special tools or uploading to a special queue.
Thanks.
Source: llvm-toolchain-snapshot
Version: 1:3.9~svn274438-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
As I wrote in #835645, some of the ffmpeg symbols in 7:3.1.2-1 do not
generate tight enough dependencies and if mpv is used with an old version
of ffmpeg, it segfaults.
This is fixed
Source: abinit
Version: 7.8.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
>
> That was the idea. After your report, I realized mkchromecast is
> mostly useless in systems without pulseaudio right now. I will
> remove that dependency in next releases.
Great.
> Yesterday, I was already playing with ffmpeg + ALSA to capture
>
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 08:56:27AM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
>> please consider uploading the package in source-only form, [...]
>
> FWIW: Soruce-only uploads are done with "dpkg-buildpackage -S".
>
> You don't need any
Source: lua-openssl
Version: 20151221-2
Severity: important
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all
packages using OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that
build can be found at:
Source: lua-cqueues
Version: 20160812-1
Severity: important
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all
packages using OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that
build can be found at:
Source: ncrack
Version: 0.5-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build because it doesn't build depend
on zlib1g-dev. It used to be pulled in by libssl-dev, but the
version in experimental no longer depends on it.
A log is available at:
Hi,
please note that I am not the maintainer of the package, I am just
trying to add value to the bug report as I have stumbled upon a
similiar issue in my letsencrypt.sh installation.
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:11:07PM +0200, Elrond wrote:
> It could also be an option to include my example
>
tags 835723 pending
tags 835668 sid stretch
fixed 835723 pdal/1.3.0~rc1-1~exp1
merge 835723 835668
thanks
Hi Lucas,
Thanks for reporting this issue, but Santiago Vila beat you to it in
#835723.
As mentioned in the other bugreport, I fixed this issue for 1.3.0-RC1
yesterday which was
Control: severity -1 wishlist
This needs compiling against libncurses(w)6 which is not available in
Debian yet.
The libncursesw5 you are using from testing is currently compiled with
--with-abi-version=5.
So mouse wheel scrolling at ABI level 6 is not intended to work in
Debian yet.
Bugs #230990
On Sunday, 17 July 2016 3:48:26 AM AEST Michael Biebl wrote:
> Could you check the output of udevadm info --query=all for the
> underlying devices and see what ID_BTRFS_READY is set to.
Thanks for looking into this problem, Michael.
Partially because of this problem I'm no longer using multi
On 27/08/16 at 12:07 -0700, Aliaksey Kandratsenka wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > severity 831240 important
> > reopen 831240
> >
> > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >
> >> I recently discovered that the official Debian images on
* on the Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:55:50AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Does java not provide a whole backtrace? That information is needed to
> be able to know in which conditions the issue is happening, and thus
> possibly why.
Here's the hs_err log:
#
# A fatal error has been detected by
Source: opensaml2
Version: 2.5.5-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build because it doesn't build depend
on zlib1g-dev. It used to be pulled in by libssl-dev, but the
version in experimental no longer depends on it.
A log is available at:
On 2016-08-28 11:47:32, James Cowgill wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> Hi,
>
> As I wrote in #835645, some of the ffmpeg symbols in 7:3.1.2-1 do not
> generate tight enough dependencies and if mpv is
Package: libxml-libxml-perl
Version: 2.0128+dfsg-1
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/man/man3/XML::LibXML::XPathContext.3pm.gz
DESCRIPTION header missing
my $size = $xpc->getContextSize;
$xpc->setContextNode($node) <---AFTER THIS LINE
The
Source: python2.7
Version: 2.7.12-2
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugs.python.org/issue26470
OpenSSL 1.1.0 has been released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package succeeded to build but it should have failed. That is why
this
Source: log4cpp
Version: 1.1.1-1
Severity: minor
Hi,
The Vcs-Git URL in debian/control is currently
https://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/log4cpp.git, but should be
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/log4cpp.git.
Regards,
James
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Andreas!
Andreas Henriksson:
> Read your bug report (#835533) and spent a few seconds looking at
> the gcc6 ftbfs (#811640).
Thanks a lot!
> The current ftbfs looks trivial to resolve bit apparently noone
> cares enough about the package.
OK, this is a useful data point.
> Since you
Source: subcommander
Version: 2.0.0~b5p2-5.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build because it doesn't build depend
on zlib1g-dev. It used to be pulled in by libssl-dev, but the
version in experimental no longer depends on it.
A log is available at:
Older versions of tinyxml defined both XML_NO_ERROR and XML_SUCCESS to 0. Never
versions define only XML_SUCCESS.
Source: tntnet
Version: 2.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build because it doesn't build depend
on zlib1g-dev. It used to be pulled in by libssl-dev, but the
version in experimental no longer depends on it.
A log is available at:
Source: transmission
Version: 2.84-3.1
Severity: important
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all
packages using OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that
build can be found at:
Package: texlive-binaries
Version: 2016.20160513.41080-6
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
While using the cruft package, a number of your executables were
reported as broken symlinks. They are:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 48 Aug 19 05:00 /usr/bin/ht ->
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Roberto S. Galende"
Package name: triops
Version : 9.0-1
Upstream Author : "Roberto S. Galende"
URL : http://github.com/circulosmeos/triops
License : GPL
Source: vboot-utils
Version: 0~R52-8350.B-1
Severity: important
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all
packages using OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that
build can be found at:
Source: websocketpp
Version: 0.7.0-5
Severity: important
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 has been released. During a rebuild of all
packages using OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that
build can be found at:
Source: kido
Version: 0.1.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<
Source: clustalo
Version: 1.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/b
Source: prometheus
Version: 1.0.1+ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ===
Source: dolphin
Version: 4:16.04.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: z3
Version: 4.4.1-0.2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
z3 fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
[..]
Source: z3
Version: 4.4.1-0.2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: ivtools
Version: 1.2.11a1-7
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/b
Source: ros-vision-opencv
Version: 1.11.11+ds-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ros-geometry
Version: 1.11.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: etcd
Version: 2.3.7+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: python-django-openstack-auth
Version: 2.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: qwt
Version: 6.1.2-5.2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: odin
Version: 2.0.2-0.3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/b
Source: golang-github-digitalocean-godo
Version: 0.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: gcc-5-cross
Version: 24
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: pypy
Version: 5.3.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: golang-go.tools
Version: 0.0~hg20140703-4
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: criu
Version: 2.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: libpgp-sign-perl
Version: 0.20-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pyevolve
Version: 0.6~rc1+svn398+dfsg-9
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: marble
Version: 4:16.04.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: osmosis
Version: 0.45-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: isoquery
Version: 3.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: golang-github-jfrazelle-go
Version: 0.0~git20150906.0.a8e3e21-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64
Source: notary
Version: 0.1~ds1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: cppcheck
Version: 1.74-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -I
Source: mod-gnutls
Version: 0.7.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: goldencheetah
Version: 4.0.0~DEV1607-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Hi Tincho,
On 14/08/16 at 15:25 +0100, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> severity 832834 normal
> thanks
>
> Since there are no news on this, I am downgrading the bug for the time
> being, as it is threatening to remove a few rdeps from testing.
Well next time it would be a good idea to Cc me ;)
> I
Source: parcimonie
Version: 0.10.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> t
Hi Doko,
thanks for the report, I'm pretty sure it's
https://bugs.debian.org/798408. Can you give me a hint, how to proceed
with this?
Cheers Jochen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:52:08PM +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 08:56:27AM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >> please consider uploading the package in source-only form, [...]
> >
> >
On 2016-08-26 "marcelomen...@gmail.com" wrote:
> 2016-08-25 13:25 GMT-04:00 Andreas Metzler :
>> On 2016-08-24 "marcelomen...@gmail.com" wrote:
>>> Package: libgnutls30
>>> Version: 3.5.3-2
[...]
>>> Trying to git clone a github
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
Please remove collab-qa-tools from Debian. It's a set of scripts mainly
useful to do archive rebuilds. There's no real point in having them in
the archive, and it mainly slow things to have to care about it.
Thanks,
Lucas
Source: open-vm-tools
Version: 2:10.0.7-3227872-4.1
Severity: important
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all
packages using OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that
build can be found at:
On 24 August 2016 at 16:43, Joost van Baal-Ilić <
joostvb-debian-doc-2016082...@mdcc.cx> wrote:
> > I am afraid I will not be able to do this until maybe mid-september.
> > Unfortunately I do not have currently access to my development
> environment.
>
> OK, thanks for getting back to me. I
control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
control: severity -1 important
Hi Jens,
thanks for your bug report, but I don't see this problem on
https://jenkins.debian.net/view/torbrowser/job/torbrowser-launcher_test_on_stretch_amd64/lastBuild/
IOW: I cannot reproduce this bug, thus downgrading
Package: libxml-libxml-perl
Version: 2.0128+dfsg-1
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/man/man3/XML::LibXML::XPathContext.3pm.gz
Running the SYNOPSIS, we see,
1. You forgot a lot of ';'.
2.
perl -pwle 's/$/;/;' /tmp/SYNOPSIS|perl -w
"my" variable $xpc masks earlier declaration in same scope at -
Source: python3.5
Version: 3.5.2-3
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugs.python.org/issue26470
OpenSSL 1.1.0 has been released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package succeeded to build but it should have failed. That is why
this
Hi,
In data domenica 28 agosto 2016 12:27:34 CEST, Lucas Nussbaum ha scritto:
> Source: plasma-sdk
> Version: 5.7.0-1
Two days ago there was the upload od version 5.7.4-1: can you please
try that one?
I guess it would be better to not send a FTBFS bug report if the
attempted version becomes
reopen 828490
thanks
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:27:18PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> pdns (4.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* New upstream release, drop upstream applied patch. (Closes: #828490,
> #830808)
It's still failing to build, but now with:
dns_random.cc:
Source: python-cryptography
Version: 1.4-2
Severity: important
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all
packages using OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that
build can be found at:
[Ben Longbons]
> Description: An interpreter for finding subtle bugs in programs
> written in standard C
Yeah, would be great if this package was available for QA work in Debian. :)
By mistake I registered a duplicate WNPP request (#835150) with this
information, provided here for completeness:
Source: tarantool
Version: 1.6.8.740.g45fc77f-1
Severity: important
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all
packages using OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that
build can be found at:
Source: dh-python
Version: 2.20160818
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: environment toolchain
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], I noticed
that some packages
Hi,
On 28/08/2016 10:00, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
(ccing people who expressed interest in this update)
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "backbone"
here we are, but I have some questions/issues:
1) why did you drop so much
On vendredi 26 août 2016 10:23:54 CEST you wrote:
> > Additionally you can tweak a bit the config by going in 'Tools ->
> > Preferences -> Behavior', then uncheck `Keep running in background`. I
> > think it is a better setting for people like you in a minimal environment
> > and which does not
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365569
It looks like https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365569 is the upstream bug
report for this issue
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Source: freebsd-utils
Version: 10.3~svn296373-2
Severity: important
I was looking on falla.d.o if this package builds against openssl 1.1.0
which sits currently in experimental.
This package failed to build with the same error as in clean sid
environment. The build log is located at
Source: pygtksourceview
Version: 2.10.1-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], I noticed
that pygtksourceview could
Package: hexchat
Version: 2.12.0-2
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
I am trying to close hexchat via window closing function of the WM
(icewm). The exit confirmation dialog appears, it has buttons with
underlined hotkeys.
However, the dialog does not respond to the hotkey presses. I also tried
Package: bitcoind
Version: 0.12.1-0.1
Severity: normal
The description of the bitcoin* packages mentions the following line:
This requires 20+ GB of space, slowly growing.
That info seems to be severely outdated and actually uses 87+ GB on my system,
which is more then 4 times as much. I've put
Package: systemd
Version: 215-17+deb8u4
In a scenario where the NFS server is not yet up when mounting an NFS
share at boot, the systemd *.mount unit times out and gets stuck in a
somewhat odd "active (mounted)" state, even though it is not actually
mounted. This appears to prevent any
Control: reassign 835808 libgtk2.0-0
Terminator shows the same symptoms. This seems to be a generic problem with gtk
then.
Regards,
Eduard.
101 - 200 of 413 matches
Mail list logo