Package: fusioninventory-agent
Version: 1:2.4.1-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned
directories on the system after purge, which is a violation of
policy 6.8:
On Sat, 04 Aug 2018 23:21:19 +0800 intrigeri wrote:
> BTW I have proposed update to use `dri-enumerate` abstraction and remove
backported rule:
> https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/58589/
If I'm supposed to act on this, please clarify what I should do,
otherwise ignore this sentence.
Sorry
Package: usbguard
Version: 0.7.2+ds-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
Control: owner -1 !
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 11:34:31PM +0800, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> Package: verbiste-el
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> lintian reports emacsen-common-without-dh-elpa on the verbiste-el package.
> Please fix it.
>
I have WIP on the master branch here:
Package: nagios4-cgi
Version: 4.3.4-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
Source: ghdl
Version: 0.35+git20180503+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justication: Policy 12.5
X-Debbugs-CC: Andreas Bombe , ftpmas...@debian.org, Thorsten
Alteholz
Hi,
I just ACCEPTed ghdl from NEW but the FTP team noticed it was missing the
entire text of the CC license.
Regards,
--
Hi Tomasz,
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 11:42:17PM +0800, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> On 27/07/18 13:04, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > [...]
>
> Hey all,
> sorry for extremely long lag in fixing this...
>
> Anyway, I went with Nicholas' suggestion and added verbiste-gtk,
> whereas verbiste-gnome is now
Package: glance-common
Version: 2:16.0.1-7
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
Control: forwarded -1 https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-block/msg29103.html
Control: tags -1 + upstream fixed-upstream confirmed
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 src:lvm2 2.02.176-4.1
Control: retitle -2 lvm2: Ensure COW device is writable even for read-only
thick snapshots
Hi,
On
Package: salt-master
Version: 2017.7.4+dfsg1-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned
directories on the system after purge, which is a violation of
policy 6.8:
Package: openvas-manager
Version: 7.0.3-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
Few days ago, we set up a new project for Supervisor in Salsa because Alioth
has been shutdowned.
The project includes the last commits from the Alioth repository. It was the
first step to update the package.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: emacs-goodies-el
Version: 40.0
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
Package: openstack-cluster-installer-poc
Version: 2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned
directories on the system after purge, which is a violation of
policy 6.8:
Package: cryptsetup-initramfs
Version: 2:2.0.3-7
Severity: normal
Dear maintainer, last version uploaded to unstable cannot be installed. Please
find the log attached.
Thanks,
--
TiN
$ docker run --rm -it debian:unstable bash
apt-get uroot@421084c1b79c:/# apt-get update
Get:1
Package: vim-command-t
Version: 5.0.2-5-g7147ba9-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned
directories on the system after purge, which is a violation of
policy 6.8:
Package: sbuild-debian-developer-setup
Version: 0.77.0-4
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
Control: reopen -1
The patch I just uploaded fixed the problem on my x86-64 box and plummer the
ppc64el porterbox.
However the same test still segfaults on armhf even with gcc-8.
I'll try to get another stacktrace and notify upstream.
X
Ximin Luo:
> Control: forwarded -1
Package: panko-common
Version: 3.1.0-6
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
Package: glare-common
Version: 0.5.0-4
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
Package: congress-common
Version: 7.0.0+dfsg1-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
Package: senlin-common
Version: 5.0.1-2.1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
Package: ironic-common
Version: 1:10.1.0-5
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
Package: cloudkitty-common
Version: 7.0.0-4
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
Hi Sean,
Sean Whitton wrote:
> > when trying to switch the package tpp (which also ships "tpp-mode.el" to
> > edit tpp files), dh_elpa expects a file named
> > debian/.debhelper/elpa/tpp.desc despite debian/elpa lists
> > "contrib/tpp-mode.el".
> >
> > The content of the debian/elpa file seems to
Package: sahara-common
Version: 1:8.0.1-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
Package: murano-common
Version: 1:5.0.0-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
On 2018-08-05 14:53, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> thanks for your quick reply!
>
> Quoting Andreas Beckmann (2018-08-05 14:34:11)
>> On 2018-08-05 13:57, Johannes Schauer wrote:
>>> Unfortunately, I see no easy way to achieve the same with piuparts. How does
>>> one pass extra
Source: soundtouch
Version: 1.9.2-1
Severity: normal
Tags: security upstream
Forwarded: https://gitlab.com/soundtouch/soundtouch/issues/7
Hi,
The following vulnerabilities were published for soundtouch, the
impact is negligible, but filling the bug to track any upstream move
on the upstream
On Sun, 5 Aug 2018 13:06:09 +0200 Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Source: tclcl
> User: helm...@debian.org
> Usertags: rebootstrap
> Control: affects -1 + src:nam
>
> nam fails to cross build from source, because it fails running tcl2c++
> with an "Exec format error". Usually, this indicates that tclcl
Control: reassign -1 gnutls28
Control: forcemerge 863147 905272
On 2018-08-02 Renge wrote:
> Package: guile-gnutls
> Severity: wishlist
> Dear Maintainer,
> The guile-gnutls package is absent, yet it is still included in the
> gnutls distribution.
> Would it be packaged again?
Hello,
no I do
Lars Kruse a écrit :
> Hello Bertrand,
>
>
> Am Sun, 5 Aug 2018 10:01:58 +0200
> schrieb BERTRAND Joël :
>
>> Yesterday, after my bug report, I have done a apt dist-upgrade and this
>> message disappears. Very strange, perl and munin were not upgraded.
>
> What a pity - this issue looked
Package: mergerfs
Version: 2.18.0-1
If I do a minimal install of Debian Stretch, install mergerfs, and
attempt to mount something with it I get the fault [mount: wrong fs
type, bad option, bad superblock]
I found that I was missing the fuse package. After running [apt-get
install fuse] I was able
Package: sreview-common
Version: 0.3.1-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned
directories on the system after purge, which is a violation of
policy 6.8:
Package: barbican-common
Version:
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned
directories on the system after purge, which is a violation of
policy 6.8:
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Hello,
On Sun 05 Aug 2018 at 02:58AM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> when trying to switch the package tpp (which also ships "tpp-mode.el" to
> edit tpp files), dh_elpa expects a file named
> debian/.debhelper/elpa/tpp.desc despite debian/elpa lists
>
Package: octavia-common
Version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
Package: designate-common
Version: 1:6.0.0-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
Package: heat-common
Version: 1:10.0.0-3
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
Package: aodh-common
Version: 6.0.0-7
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
Hi Andreas,
thanks for your quick reply!
Quoting Andreas Beckmann (2018-08-05 14:34:11)
> On 2018-08-05 13:57, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > Unfortunately, I see no easy way to achieve the same with piuparts. How does
> > one pass extra packages to piuparts? --extra-old-packages seems to be the
>
Hello Bertrand,
Am Sun, 5 Aug 2018 10:01:58 +0200
schrieb BERTRAND Joël :
> Yesterday, after my bug report, I have done a apt dist-upgrade and this
> message disappears. Very strange, perl and munin were not upgraded.
What a pity - this issue looked mysteriously interesting :)
I fail to have
Followup-For: Bug #903698
Control: tag -1 sid buster
Since this bug seems to require more than one supported python 3.x
version to show up, I'm tagging it sid+buster, because we have only
one python 3.x version in (old)stable.
Please fix the tags if I misunderstood something.
Andreas
Source: lepton
Version: 1.2.1+20170405-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch security upstream
Forwarded: https://github.com/dropbox/lepton/issues/107
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for lepton.
CVE-2018-12108[0]:
| An issue was discovered in Dropbox Lepton 1.2.1. The
|
On 2018-08-05 13:57, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Unfortunately, I see no easy way to achieve the same with piuparts. How does
> one pass extra packages to piuparts? --extra-old-packages seems to be the
> wrong
> choice. Is the only way to do this by creating a new apt repository with all
>
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Control: forcemerge 904441 905492
Hi Loreno,
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 02:11:59PM +0200, Loreno Heer wrote:
[...]
> > Can you check, does, does adding the kernel parameters
> >
> > dm_mod.use_blk_mq=0 scsi_mod.use_blk_mq=0
> >
> > help in your case?
> >
>
> Yes,
during boot
Message-Id: <20180805141159.6814fd039d4debe9f370b...@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Sun, 5 Aug 2018 13:46:39 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
>
On Saturday, August 4, 2018, at 1:40 AM EDT, László Böszörményi wrote:
> I've fixed the FAT issue and sent it to upstream.
Ha, I did the same thing (we're
https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/pull/277 and
https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/pull/278). Everything's merged now, so
Hi,
On Fri, 05 Jan 2018 23:18:20 -0500 Harlan Lieberman-Berg
wrote:
> I've noticed that when you pass --extra-package to sbuild to do multi-step
> packaging, the piuparts run will fail being unable to resolve the
> dependencies.
>
> It is precisely when I'm doing multi-step packaging that I
Em 04-08-2018 19:21, Jörg Frings-Fürst escreveu:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Herbert,
Am Samstag, den 04.08.2018, 09:05 -0300 schrieb Herbert Fortes:
Hi,
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> retitle 905375 RFS: bitz-server/2.0.1-1
> thanks
Hello,
this is a plausible problem. What do you think how this should be
solved for debian? I guess normally openvpn should read the config as
root and drop the privileges afterwards.
In my concrete case I do not see the option, but it may be a default.
My
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Loreno,
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 01:23:30PM +0200, Loreno Heer wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 4.17.8-1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> *** Reporter, please consider
Control: tags -1 +pending
Hi Helmut,
On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 12:03 PM Helmut Grohne wrote:
> patch fails to build from source on amd64 in unstable. A build log ends
> as follows:
>
> | make[3]: Leaving directory '/<>/src'
> | Making all in tests
> | make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/tests'
> |
video of boot: https://we.tl/tEGWko3GTP
On 03.08.2018 06:03, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Changes:
> tinyxml2 (6.2.0+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* [7fdca1f] Rename package for abi break (Closes: #898535)
How do you plan to deal with the breakage that results from the renaming? Did
you already ask for binNMUs? I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arnaud Rebillout
* Package name: golang-github-gogo-googleapis
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : gogoprotobuf
* URL : https://github.com/gogo/googleapis
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description :
The current government icon is a hand with a ballot paper. The current
technology icon is a ballot box.
The government icon in 1.12.0 was different; I fished it out of git and
attached it. It's a series of raised hands; not particularly
American/USAn. Arguably the background is (blue background
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.17.8-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation? Upgrade to new kernel 4.17 made system
unbootable.
* What exactly
On 2018-07-27 23:56:53 [+0200], To Marc Dequènes wrote:
> On 2018-07-25 22:03:46 [+0200], To Marc Dequènes wrote:
> > > I just tried loading Adam's configuration on another system to test the
> > > ScanOnAccess, copied a clamav test file in one of the protected directory
> > > and hit the problem.
Hi Nicolai,
Nicolai Lissner (2018-08-05):
> while examining the reasons for a bug with cdebootstrap I found
> the actual problem is in libdebian-installer (well it was fine before
> librust-winapi-dev entered sid) and sent a fix.
>
> Please have a look at Bug #904699 for details.
FWIW you
Source: soundtouch
Version: 1.9.2-1
Severity: important
Tags: security upstream
Forwarded: https://gitlab.com/soundtouch/soundtouch/issues/6
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for soundtouch, filling the
bug to track the upstream issue.
CVE-2018-1000223[0]:
|Heap-based buffer
Source: tclcl
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Control: affects -1 + src:nam
nam fails to cross build from source, because it fails running tcl2c++
with an "Exec format error". Usually, this indicates that tclcl should
be marked Multi-Arch: foreign. Being a package whose main
Hi Piotr, just doing ping :)
On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 18:40:48 -0300 Agustin Henze wrote:
> Package: dh-python
> Version: 3.20180326
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi, I was checking if the python package python-logbook was reproducible using
> reprotest and the gitlab pipeline was failing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ipmitool"
Package name: ipmitool
Version : 1.8.18-6
Upstream Author : Alexander Amelkin
URL :
Package: open-infrastructure-storage-tools
Version: 20171101-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Please find the updated German debconf translation for
open-infrastructure-storage-tools
attached.
Please place this file in debian/po/ as de.po for your next upload.
If you update your template,
Source: hyperkitty, django-q
Version: hyperkitty/1.1.4-6
Version: django-q/0.9.4-2
Tags: ftbfs
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of django-q the building of hyperkitty in its
autpkgtest started to fail in unstable and testing. I
Package: chrony
Version: 3.3-2
Hi,
Why is the AppArmor profile put into complain mode? The preinst
has this:
case "$1" in
upgrade)
APP_PROFILE="usr.sbin.chronyd"
APP_CONFFILE="/etc/apparmor.d/$APP_PROFILE"
APP_COMPLAIN="/etc/apparmor.d/force-complain/$APP_PROFILE"
I see that there is a new version, 2.32-0.4, which mentions this
in the changelog.
On reading the man page more carefully, I can see that this might be
regarded as correct behaviour.
ael
Source: patch
Version: 2.7.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
patch fails to build from source on amd64 in unstable. A build log ends
as follows:
| make[3]: Leaving directory '/<>/src'
| Making all in tests
| make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/tests'
| cd .. && /bin/bash
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 09:11:14AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 08:55:32AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Scanning the recent upload history, automake-1.16 looks suspicious now.
>
> Yes, it looks like a missing Makefile.am dependency. The
Package: rawtran-doc
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
the description for rawtran-doc is "Documentation of Munipack" but it should be
"Documentation of Rawtran"
thanks,
Daniele
Ben Hutchings (2018-08-02):
> Someone else suggested this might be related to using "blk-mq", so
> could you try with these parameter:
>
> dm_mod.use_blk_mq=0 scsi_mod.use_blk_mq=0
The machine ran for two days withh these options, and no strange I/O
freeze happened. It is still a bit early to be
Source: tcpflow
Version: 1.4.4+repack1-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch security upstream
Forwarded: https://github.com/simsong/tcpflow/issues/182
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for tcpflow.
CVE-2018-14938[0]:
| An issue was discovered in wifipcap/wifipcap.cpp in TCPFLOW through
Hi Pierre,
On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 22:50:09 +0200 Pierre-Elliott =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=E9cue?=
wrote:
> Do you intend to include this patch in a next release of sbuild? :)
thanks for the reminder! This must've somehow slipped my preparations for the
last release. It is now in my local git and will be
Hi,
On 5 August 2018 at 06:54, Alex Kirchhoff wrote:
> retitle 897414 plantuml: Upgrade to version 1.2018.9 and improve description
> tags 897414 patch
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> Upstream has released version 1.2018.9 in the mean-time (see [1]). I have
> prepared an updated source package, available
Hi Martin,
Thanks.
Dear all,
NCHC network guy has removed the records from the zone:
$ dig nchc.org.tw ns
; <<>> DiG 9.11.3-1ubuntu1.1-Ubuntu <<>> nchc.org.tw ns
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 41937
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY:
Package: fwupd-amd64-signed-template
Version: 1.1.0-6
Severity: serious
There is still one syntax error in the `Depends` field of the source
package template (the `}`):
Depends: ..., fwupd (= 1.1.0-6})
^^^
This resulted in a build failure for
> There is a circular dependency between gnuift and gnuift-perl:
>
> gnuift :Depends: gnuift-perl (= 0.1.14-10)
> gnuift-perl :Depends: gnuift (>= 0.1.14-10), gnuift (<< 0.1.14-10.1~)
>
>
> Circular dependencies are known to cause problems during upgrade, so we
> should try to get rid of them.
>
Source: mediastreamer2
Version: 1:2.16.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Hi,
mediastreamer2 FTBFS since GCC-8 became the default compiler:
[ 38%] Building C object
src/CMakeFiles/mediastreamer_voip-static.dir/voip/audiostream.c.o
cd
On 08/04/2018 09:05 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: tags 896305 + patch
> Control: tags 896305 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for laditools (versioned as 1.1.0-3.1) and uploaded
> it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
>
> cu
> Adrian
>
Hi,
On Sunday, August 5, 2018, Paul Bransford wrote:
> Package: mate-panel
> Version: 1.20.2-1~bpo9+1
> Severity: normal
>
> Various applications no longer display icons in the notification tray.
> Examples
> include redshift-gtk 1.11-1 and blueman-applet 2.0.4-1.
>
> This used to happen to a
Package: x11vnc
Version: 0.9.13-2
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
I found typo in man page and some files.
$ grep -r piv4 .
./README: all usage modes no IPv4 support is required.
See -nopiv4
./.pc/0002-Support-openssl-1.1.0.patch/README: all usage
Lars Kruse a écrit :
> Package: munin
> Followup-For: Bug #905457
>
> Hello Bertrand,
Hello Lars,
> On Sat, 04 Aug 2018 22:35:54 +0200, BERTRAND Joël wrote,
>
>> I don't understand why perl tries to run /usr/sbin/munin, there is no
>> such script nor executable.
>
> indeed there is no
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi Paul,
intrigeri:
>>> - Don't bloat the logs with fingerprints of keys that could not
>>>be found (Closes: #900388). Also, hide spurious
>>>"dirmngr:Network:/usr/bin/dirmngr:1:1:" output.
>> This doesn't seem to have fixed the problem for me
Chris Lamb:
> tags 905467 + pending
> thanks
>
> Implemented in Git, pending upload:
>
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/514313860d51930c986bbcb3eca6ec4ac7905852
>
> checks/changes-file.desc | 12
> checks/changes-file.pm
Package: python-urllib3
Version: 1.22-1
I cannot import urllib3.contrib.pyopenssl:
>>> import urllib3.contrib.pyopenssl
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/urllib3/contrib/pyopenssl.py",
line 62, in
from ..packages import six
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for docker (versioned as 1.5-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru docker-1.5/debian/changelog docker-1.5/debian/changelog
--- docker-1.5/debian/changelog 2014-06-11 23:05:50.0
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 01:59:39PM +0800, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> While I didn't yet rebuild all impacted packages, I expect all (or most) to
> rebuild cleanly as the removed APIs have been deprecated for a while.
I'm currently doing the mass-rebuild and filing FTBFSes, but the only
Am 29.07.2018 um 15:32 schrieb Michael Prokop:
> 1) "systemctl cat ssh.service" NOT list its unit if it's not running, or
> 2) "systemctl cat 'ssh*'" *list* its unit file even if it's not running,
> but known to the sysstem (since `systemctl cat ssh.service` lists it too)?
>
> (JFTR, I wanted to
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.32-0.4
Severity: normal
Dear Andreas, Maintainer,
the change to 'su' from 'util-linux' broke an important workload for me:
My backup script, running as root, needs access to the SSH agent running
as user in order to backup remote machines. It needs root access for
Source: openjk
Version: 0~20180414.698fe7c~dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-8
Hi,
openjk started to FTBFS after GCC 8 was made the default compiler:
[ 13%]
Source: poezio
Version: 0.11+git20180331-1
Severity: serious
Justication: Policy 12.5
X-Debbugs-CC: W. Martin Borgert ,
ftpmas...@debian.org
Hi,
I just ACCEPTed poezio from NEW but noticed it was missing
attribution in debian/copyright for at least Emmanuel Gil
Peyrot
This is in no way
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.18.3
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/debcheckout
Hi !
I just noticed that debcheckout doesn't support checking out packages that use
dgit, where it could be done automatically:
> $ debcheckout chiark-utils
> No repository found for package chiark-utils.
>
>
Package: chiark-utils
Version: 5.0.2
bash: /usr/bin/hexterm: /usr/bin/tclsh8.4: bad interpreter: No such
file or directory
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
Am 05.08.2018 um 09:12 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> hm, update-debian.s /home/jaap/bin/update-debian.sh
> /home/jaap/bin/update-debian.sh...
> How exactly do you trigger the update?
> Is system fully booted at this point?
> Can you provide us with steps how to reproduce the issue?
Please also attach
Hi Andreas,
On 05/08/2018 05:40, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
$ xhost +si:localuser:temp
$ su - temp
You are right that the old su would copy over DISPLAY and XAUTHORITY
environment variables, even when you tell it to give you a new
clean environment.
probably this modification must be
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/issues/4753
The segfault happens on all architectures and we were just unlucky that it
happened on the ones that we saw.
I've filed an upstream issue with a stack trace, will continue debugging later.
X
Pirate Praveen:
> On 18/07/18
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 08:55:32AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Scanning the recent upload history, automake-1.16 looks suspicious now.
Yes, it looks like a missing Makefile.am dependency. The attached patch
makes it build.
Helmut
--- libtextwrap-0.1.orig/Makefile.am
Ondřej, please always CC the maintainers of the package you are
reassigning a bug to.
On Sun, 5 Aug 2018 06:56:38 +0200 =?utf-8?B?T25kxZllaiBTdXLDvQ==?=
wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 systemd
>
> I’ve seen this few times in the past, but there’s nothing I can do from
> php-common. The units
Hi Elana,
Elana Hashman wrote:
> NEWS.Debian files are listed in the "unofficial policy"[1] but not in
> the official policy.
>
> It seems this was proposed in 2002[2], but in 2003, folks were
> hesitant to "[get] this into policy until enough stuff uses it that we
> can tell it works well".
>
>
101 - 200 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
