Package: ruby-github-markup
Version: 1.7.0+dfsg-2~bpo9+1_all
gitlab-markup gem is no longer in this package,
this breaks gitlab.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bourg
* Package name: caffeine-cache
Version : 2.6.2
Upstream Author : Ben Manes
* URL : https://github.com/ben-manes/caffeine
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : High performance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 29.01.19 um 12:06 schrieb Markus Koschany:
> I am sorry but OpenJDK 8 will not be supported at runtime in
> Buster. If it works with OpenJDK 11, which it does, then we should
> spend the remaining time before the release on more urgent issues.
Well, in my case, the ARM compiler in the distribution (Ubuntu)
stopped working (from 16.04 to 18.04). So I had to install a third
party ARM compiler .deb .
I was going to argue that packaging error can be avoided if there
would be an easy tool that scans an entire repository for duplicate
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello, virtualbox is not supported anymore on i386, so now the
src:virtualbox only provides the *guest* tools (still supported)
Please remove on i386 only virtualbox and virtualbox-qt binaries
thanks
Gianfranco
Am 29.01.19 um 10:58 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Le 29/01/2019 à 10:40, Per Lundberg a écrit :
>> FWIW, version 1.4.2-1 works correctly with openjdk-11-jdk version
>> 11.0.2+7-1, but it _does not_ work correct any more with Java 8
>> (openjdk-8-jdk version 8u191-b12-2)
>
> Thank you for the
Hi Paul
On 2019/01/20 21:09, Paul Gevers wrote:
With a recent upload of blis the autopkgtest of python-scipy fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of blis
from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from testing. In
tabular form:
Control: forcemerge 672608 -1
On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 13:50:28 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.19.0.5
> Severity: wishlist
> In the rpm world, there is a way to define in the list of files, files
> that are not installed by the package, but by the maintainer scripts
Package: lsb-release
Version: 10.2018112800
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
At first this system was Ubuntu 13.04, then 13.10, 14.04 and 16.04
version. Yesterday I upgraded it to Debian 10 with just APT/Aptitude.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was
Control: tags -1 pending upstream patch
This seems fixed by this upstream commit:
https://git.netfilter.org/iptables/commit/?id=947c51c95edbbf08d6b3c105177ac5cfa238aade
Hi Rogério!
Both Fedora and Arch are shipping a patched version 540.1 [1, 2],
so updating to newer versions seems possible with some elbow
grease.
Could you maybe import the sources from Fedora and thus update the
Debian package to version 540.1?
Thanks,
Adrian
> [1]
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 9:15 AM Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> tags 480725 - patch
> stop
>
>
> On 15.05.08 09:49, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> > Norbert Preining wrote:
>
> Dear Taco,
>
> >> forwarded 480725 dev-cont...@ntg.nl
> >> thanks
> >>
> >> Dear Hans, dear Taco,
> >>
> >> on the Debian side we
Package: src:olive
Version: 20181223-1
Severity: serious
You hijacked the name of an unrelated package:
| Description: console RSS reader
| Olive is a console mode RSS newsreader. It provides a chronological
| rather than site-oriented view of news stories and tries to stay out
| of your way
Version: 1.19.3
On Sat, 2019-01-12 at 06:51:38 +, M. Zhou wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.19.2
> X-Debbugs-CC: by...@debian.org
>
> Dear Dpkg maintainer,
>
> This is the zh_CN.po update. Please poke byang if you need another
> DD to review.
>
> ~/D/d/d/po ❯❯❯ msgfmt -v zh_CN.po
> 1116
Hi,
The same issue as #861183 is found in binutils, when built with OBS, it
generates files inside the tarball looking like this:
-rw-r--r-- root/root 959 2018-06-24 20:38 BUILD/bfd/aout32.c
-rw-r--r-- root/root 1097 2018-06-24 20:38 BUILD/bfd/aout64.c
-rw-r--r-- root/root166798
Le 29/01/2019 à 10:40, Per Lundberg a écrit :
> FWIW, version 1.4.2-1 works correctly with openjdk-11-jdk version
> 11.0.2+7-1, but it _does not_ work correct any more with Java 8
> (openjdk-8-jdk version 8u191-b12-2)
Thank you for the feedback Per. What issue did you see when using
visualvm
Hi James,
thanks. Have you raised this issue with upstream somehow? I know
chan_sip is deprecated, but I doubt a bug this severe would be
undetected for that long.
I'll try to whip together a test for this (my test installation is using
chan_pjsip and IPv6).
Bernhard
Le 29/01/2019 à 07:41, Xavier a écrit :
> Le 28/01/2019 à 18:45, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
>> Source: popper.js
>> Version: 1.14.6+ds-1
>> Severity: serious
>> Justification: Policy 2.1
>>
>> Source package contains several files (seemingly all of them) below
>> which does not exist in upstream
FWIW, version 1.4.2-1 works correctly with openjdk-11-jdk version
11.0.2+7-1, but it _does not_ work correct any more with Java 8
(openjdk-8-jdk version 8u191-b12-2)
This worked correctly with 1.3.9-1 after downgrading the libnb-*-java
packages as suggested by Ben - visualvm worked fine on
(Sending this again since the first submission’s got delayed by a filter.)
On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 21:51, Different55 wrote:
>
> Alright, not entirely sure if I did this right but I followed Debian's
> Building Tutorial to download and build wpa_supplicant with the changes you
> linked. One
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 at 10:46:59 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> telepathy-spec still lists me and Jonny Lamb in its Uploaders; we removed
> ourselves from Uploaders in the VCS in 2014 and 2016 respectively. The
> package's metadata also still refers to Alioth
The freeze is imminent. Please could
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 at 12:24:47 +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-08-28 at 10:48 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > telepathy-spec still lists me and Jonny Lamb in its Uploaders; we
> > removed
> > ourselves from Uploaders in the VCS in 2014 and 2016 respectively.
> > The
> > package's
BTW, this issue was thoroughly discussed in the yarnpkg ITP:
https://bugs.debian.org/843021#65
Paolo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2019-01-29 at 09:30 +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> * I had very spurious problems with the lock screen (say once in three
> months) under Debian stretch
> * however under 'buster' the problem is 100% repeatable
> * I have tried with both
Le 29/01/2019 à 10:04, Guillem Jover a écrit :
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Thu, 2018-12-27 at 12:45:40 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Working on a package, it would have made my life easier if
dpkg-shlibdeps told me that it was caused by a rpath on the
binary.
Hmm, that's strange, RPATH
No worries, I'm taking care of it. It's been months that it's been
hitching to do it, seeing the lack of care.
I'll take back the package in the OpenStack team, as the previous
attempt to let Alison take care of it is a complete failure. She used
this package upload as a way to become DD, but
Package: opencascade
Version: 7.3.0+dfsg1
Severity: normal
To properly use newest cmake when building apps on top of opencascade
the module opencascade cmake should be in a /usr/lib/cmake/opencascade
directory instead of /usr/lib/cmake/occt.
Could you at least provide
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 at 10:51:52 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> telepathy-idle still lists me and Jonny Lamb in its Uploaders; we removed
> ourselves from Uploaders in the VCS in 2014 and 2016 respectively. The
> package's metadata also still refers to Alioth
The freeze is imminent. Please could
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Thu, 2018-12-27 at 12:45:40 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Working on a package, it would have made my life easier if
> dpkg-shlibdeps told me that it was caused by a rpath on the
> binary.
Hmm, that's strange, RPATH should be supported by dpkg-shlibdeps so
I'm not
Package: light-locker
Version: 1.8.0-3
Followup-For: Bug #846278
After upgrading from Debian 'stretch' to 'buster' I am seeing similar
behavior as the other reporters here:
* when I close the lid, the system suspends to RAM.
* when I reopen, I get a black screen
* clicking around, moving the
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi!
On Thu, 2019-01-10 at 16:20:23 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Harlan Lieberman-Berg:
> > It would be Really Awesome (TM) if we could add the
> > -fstack-clash-protection flag to our default hardening posture. This
> > would have provided protection against the
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 14:11:06 +0200,
Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Package: lynkeos.app
> Version: 2.10+dfsg1-3+b2
> Severity: grave
>
> $ Lynkeos
> Lynkeos: malloc.c:2385: sysmalloc: Assertion `(old_top == initial_top (av) &&
> old_size == 0) || ((unsigned long) (old_size)
Source: guacamole-client
Version: 0.9.9+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Tags: security upstream
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for guacamole-client.
Details are not entirely clear, nor was I able to isolate the upstream
issue for it.
CVE-2018-1340[0]:
Secure flag missing from session
tags 920763 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi dkg,
> So we don't use an "upstream tarball" other than the git repo, which
> has a signed tag in it. But lintian complains:
>
>W: orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature
Probably a silly question for this time in the morning but what is
stopping you
Source: localizer
Version: 1.13-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/localizer.html
...
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:3.0.1:jar (default-cli) on
project localizer: MavenReportException:
Source: weupnp
Version: 0.1.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs buster sid
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/weupnp.html
...
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:3.0.1:jar (default-cli) on
project weupnp:
Source: libxml-security-java
Version: 2.0.10-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/libxml-security-java.html
...
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:3.0.1:jar (default) on project
xmlsec:
Source: ansible
Version: 2.7.6+dfsg-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], we noticed
that ansible could not be built
201 - 238 of 238 matches
Mail list logo
