On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 13:29 +0530, Keyikedalube Ndang wrote:
> No image preview displayed when I click an image that I want to attach
Please could you attach a screenshot of the issue and logs of Telegram Desktop?
~/.local/share/TelegramDesktop/log.txt
Source: rainbow.js
Version: 2.1.4+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: golang-github-tinylib-msgp
Version: 1.0.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: mapsforge
Version: 0.13.0+dfsg.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: phpdox
Version: 0.12.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: doxygen
Version: 1.8.16-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: ant-contrib
Version: 1.0~b3+svn177-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: node-postcss
Version: 6.0.23-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: cider
Version: 0.19.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: node-yarnpkg
Version: 1.21.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: mockery
Version: 0.0~git20181123.e78b021-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpack
Source: node-rollup-plugin-babel
Version: 3.0.3-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpack
Source: with-simulated-input-el
Version: 2.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: udisks2
Version: 2.8.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[7]: Entering directory '/<
Source: networkx
Version: 2.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> File "/<>/exa
Source: node-xterm
Version: 3.8.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: node-promise
Version: 8.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: jquery-at.js
Version: 1.5.4+dfsg.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: stunnel4
Version: 3:5.56-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: openttd-opengfx
Version: 0.5.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering direct
Source: rust-ucd-generate
Version: 0.2.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: swi-prolog
Version: 8.0.3+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> 49: test cert_misma
Source: pasdoc
Version: 0.15.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rules binary
&
Control: severity -1 important
Re: Felix Lechner 2020-03-20
> > E: pkg-perl-tools buildinfo: field-too-long Installed-Build-Depends (11190
> > chars > 5000)
>
> I will disable the tag for this particular buildinfo field in the near future.
This is causing lots of salsa-ci pipelines to fail
Package: grub-installer
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
grub-installer contains outdated template strings, which should be updated
in regard of:
- MBR is outdated -> UEFI came as a successor;
- hard disks are no longer the only/mainly used storage media (depending on
architecture); these days
* Lucas Nussbaum:
> Source: glibc
> Version: 2.30-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
&g
Source: pry
Version: 0.12.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ruby2.7 /usr/bin/gem2deb-t
Source: mftrace
Version: 1.2.20+git20191022.3b4bc2e-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: node-immutable-tuple
Version: 0.4.10-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: spring
Version: 104.0+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux
Source: golang-github-mendersoftware-scopestack
Version: 0.0~git20180403.c2f5599-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: datatables-extensions
Version: 0.0+git20150910.28fd64e+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ruby-guard
Version: 2.16.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ruby2.7 /usr/
Source: node-entities
Version: 2.0.0+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Package: xterm
Version: 353-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
While developing a console based application using ncurses running under
an exterm, I noticed I was getting double events for the side-scrolling
buttons on my mouse (Elecom Huge: 12 buttons (including side-scrolling
on the wheel)).
Source: hplip
Source-Version: 3.20.3+dfsg0-1
Severity: normal
Hi!
After the switch of the default python to 3.8, this is seen on
upgrades:
,---
Setting up python3 (3.8.2-2) ...
running python rtupdate hooks for python3.8...
/usr/share/hplip/base/utils.py:2060: SyntaxWarning: "is" with a
Package: isc-dhcp-client
Version: 4.4.1-2
Followup-For: Bug #867625
Bug still exists in 4.4.1-2 and in 4.4.1-2.1, according to
isc-dhcp_4.4.1-2.1.debian.tar.xz. Fixing
it should be fairly easy and bring isc-dhcp-client to the documentation given
in interfaces(5).
-- System Information:
Debian
Source: commons-configuration2
Version: 2.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for commons-configuration2.
CVE-2020-1953[0]:
| Apache Commons Configuration uses a third-party library to parse YAML
| files which by default allows the
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: buster
Severity: normal
Hiya,
rails seemed to be affected by CVE-2020-5267.
This has been fixed in Sid and Jessie already.
Here's the debdiff:
On 3/22/20 3:59 PM, Holger Wansing wrote:
> - MBR is outdated -> UEFI came as a successor;
What about the boot mechanisms of all other architectures?
Open-Firmware machines use GRUB as well and they have a boot sector.
Other architectures use GRUB via chainloading with uboot, so you need
to
Package: src:mesa
Version: 20.0.2-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Dear Maintainer,
> * What led up to the situation?
Upgraded mesa packages from 19.3.3-1 to 20.0.2-1.
> * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
> ineffective)?
Tried to boot
>
On Mar 22, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> Patch attached.
Did you verify that everything will still work with no empty filters
provided and so on?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: tags 951963 + patch
Control: tags 951963 + pending
Control: tags 943007 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for fauhdlc (versioned as 20180504-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I
should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru
Source: vagrant
Version: 2.2.6+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: twitter-bootstrap4
Version: 4.4.1+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: libvirt-python
Version: 5.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
&
Source: weechat
Version: 2.7.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: libjs-jsencrypt
Version: 2.3.0+dfsg2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: ocsinventory-server
Version: 2.5+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: golang-github-hashicorp-go-plugin
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-debbundle-insert-module-globals
Version: 7.2.0+ds+~1.0.0+~1.2.0+~1.1.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant
Source: serf
Version: 1.3.9-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering direct
Source: acorn
Version:
6.2.1+ds+~0.4.0+~4.0.0+really4.0.0+~1.0.0+~5.0.1+ds+~1.7.0+ds+~0.1.1+~0.3.1+~0.2.0+~0.1.0+~0.3.0+~0.3.0-14
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your
Source: ruby-session
Version: 3.2.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> install -D -m644 /<
Package: inn2
Version: 2.6.3-1+deb10u2
Patch attached.
ttfn/rjk
commit 1adddef4321b996e08aa65a6b662eac4f58211fe
Author: Richard Kettlewell
Date: Sun Mar 22 13:52:09 2020 +
Enable Python 3.x filter
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index f1ac510..1ffc40f 100644
---
Source: node-autoprefixer
Version: 8.6.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Package: sight
Version: 19.0.0-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost1.71
Dear Maintainer,
your package fails to build with boost1.71. You can find a build log
attached. If you want to attempt the build yourself, an updated version
of boost-defaults
Source: glibc
Version: 2.30-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
> UNSUPPORTED: elf/tst-ldconfig-bad-aux-cache
> UNSUPPORTED: e
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear release team,
I would like to propose an update for the version of suricata in buster
(4.1.2-2). It addresses a problem with dropping privileges when started
wn a particular
Hi Timo,
[...]
> I would appreciate if you could consider adding this patch to the suricata
> package in the current stable release (buster) as the inabilitiy to drop root
> privileges may have severe security implications and the patch itself is
> trivial.
Thanks for taking the time to think of
Package: gnome-session-flashback
Version: 3.36.0-2
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: obsolete-conffile adequate
The recent upgrade did not deal with obsolete conffiles properly.
Please use the dpkg-maintscript-helper support provided by
dh_installdeb to remove these
Also realised that hitting the cancel button on the settings form
doesn't restore the previous settings within the UI. Have updated the
patch to fix that too.
Aaron
Make sure the frames setting is saved when it's the only setting that's changed.
Restore the previous settings in the setup form
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 06:12:48PM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > Having pondered, I'd suggest we just leave xapian-bindings as-is
> > until you're at the point of dropping python2 support from sphinx and
> > then I'll drop the sphinx-generated docs for the python2 bindings
> > from the Debian
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 02:29:00PM +0100, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> # strace -ff loffice --headless --convert-to pdf foo.doc
>
> [..]
> [pid 14336] openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libuuilo.so",
> O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> [pid
Am 22.03.20 um 14:43 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> Source: udisks2
> Version: 2.8.4-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your pack
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 02:38:33AM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
>This is what being stuck at home for weeks will cause—bug necromancy!
*grin* I hope you're keeping OK!
>I disagree with Martin-Éric Racine that _no_ default should be
>applied at all, just that there ought to be means to change it,
Hello:
I've also noticed this and looking into more insight I came accross some
likely related information [0] and [1].
HTH,
[0] https://phabricator.kde.org/D25964[1]
[1] https://phabricator.kde.org/
R165:9c33b1b4f71c45f9943418ab1d6c8abf1ce8c90f[2]
--
Raúl Sánchez Siles
[1]
On 22.3.2020 17.38, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> Package: src:mesa
> Version: 20.0.2-1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>> * What led up to the situation?
>
> Upgraded mesa packages from 19.3.3-1 to 20.0.2-1.
>
>> * What exactly did you do (or not
Package: kde-telepathy-text-ui
Version: 17.08.3-2
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Searching 'Plugins' from the application menu one finds
/usr/share/applications/kcm_ktp_chat_messages.desktop which has
Exec=kcmshell4 kcm_ktp_message_filters
and kcmshell4
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Am 22.03.20 um 08:44 schrieb Nicola:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 244.3-1
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> The default DNSSEC="allow-downgrade" doesn't work and the result is that DNS
> queries doesn't work.
>
> Temporally
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 12:10 PM Olly Betts wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 06:12:48PM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > > Having pondered, I'd suggest we just leave xapian-bindings as-is
> > > until you're at the point of dropping python2 support from sphinx and
> > > then I'll drop the
Package: gr-iio
Version: 0.3-7+b1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Installing gr-iio 0.3-7+b1 in testing / unstable does not make appear
the IIO blocks in gnuradio. Current gnuradio version in testing /
unstable is 3.8.1.0~rc1-2+b1 and I suspect this version of gr-iio is
aimed to the 3.7
Package: mythtv-status
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
I used to get the following errors when mythtv-status would start:
Mar 19 20:35:16 keflavik sh[3364]: rm: impossible de supprimer
'/var/lib/mythtv-status/motd_update_disabled': Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce
type
That
On Sun, 22 Mar 2020, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: datalad-container
> Version: 0.5.0-1
Thank you for the report. 1.0.0-1 was built but forgotten to be
uploaded at the end of Feb. Now it would need to wait until datalad
0.12.4 is uploaded first which would resolve incompatibilities with
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 04:09:53PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>On 3/22/20 3:59 PM, Holger Wansing wrote:
>> - MBR is outdated -> UEFI came as a successor;
>
>What about the boot mechanisms of all other architectures?
>
>Open-Firmware machines use GRUB as well and they have a boot
Package: bind9
Version: 1:9.16.1-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated packages
Hi!
The recent upgrade from 1:9.11.16+dfsg-2 to 1:9.16.1-1 causes
isc-dhcp-server to die upon start with SIGABRT, creating the following
backtrace:
8<
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:45:16PM +0200, Julian Hyordey wrote:
> apt show libvirt-daemon-system
> Package: libvirt-daemon-system
> Version: 5.0.0-4
> Priority: optional
> Section: admin
> Source: libvirt
> Maintainer: Debian Libvirt
Hello Antoine,
On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 at 20:13, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> I tried the package available here:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/polybar
>
> It works well! One unfortunate problem I have found, however, is that it
> requires the siji font to work in its default configuration. That
On 22.03.20 19:07, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Interestingly, isc-dhcp-server 4.4.1 does not even compile against the
> current 9.16 libs from Sid right now. Something is very broken here.
I have to correct that part. It seems my checkout from Salsa was wrong,
as recompiling the source package works.
> On 22 Mar 2020, at 19:39, Sven Hartge wrote:
>
> Interestingly, isc-dhcp-server 4.4.1 does not even compile against the
> current 9.16 libs from Sid right now. Something is very broken here.
It should not. There’s bind9-libs compatibility package for isc-dhcp and
others. Let’s keep the bug
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "keras". The package is
schedule to be autoremoved tomorrow without this update.
* Package name: keras
Version : 2.3.1+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : François Chollet
* URL
The src:bind9 package doesn’t even provide -dev package, so you are still
compiling against 9.11.
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý
> On 22 Mar 2020, at 20:09, Sven Hartge wrote:
>
> On 22.03.20 19:07, Sven Hartge wrote:
>
>> Interestingly, isc-dhcp-server 4.4.1 does not even compile against the
>>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "keras-applications". The
package is scheduled to be autoremoved tomorrow without this update.
* Package name: keras-applications
Version : 1.0.8+ds-1
Upstream Author :
Package: gimp
Version: 2.10.12-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers testing-proposed-updates-debug
APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates-debug'), (500,
'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500,
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "keras-preprocessing". The
package is schedule to be autoremoved tomorrow without this update.
* Package name: keras-preprocessing
Version : 1.1.0+ds-1
Upstream Author :
package release.debian.org
tags 954073 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: postfix
Version:
Control: fixed -1 0.4.10-5
Le 22/03/2020 à 16:27, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: node-immutable-tuple
> Version: 0.4.10-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> Du
package release.debian.org
tags 954714 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: rails
Version:
Package: mopidy
Version: 3.0.1-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
if mopidy is installed along with python3-pykka 1.2.1-4 (Buster), then
the following error message is emitted:
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pykka.messages'
The "messages" module was introduced into pykka in v2.0.0:
Package: evolution
Version: 3.36.0-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
since the update to evolution 3.36, happened last Thursday 19th of March, I
can't open the IMAP account:
"Error performing TLS handshake: A packet with illegal or unsupported version
was received."
I get the same message
Dear DDs,
I prepared packaging for the domain name permutation engine "dnstwist"
(ITP bug #948237). The git repository is currently available at
https://salsa.debian.org/wiene-guest/dnstwist
It would be great if someone could review the code, provide feedback and
- once everything looks fine -
Package: lintian
Version: 2.58.0
Severity: normal
lintian started to complain that wmnd source tarball lacks upstream
signature:
W: wmnd source: orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature wmnd_0.4.17.orig.tar.gz
The upstream tarball was uploaded to Debian archive in 2013, and there
have been no
Or would it require me to adopt the package in order to get it resurrected?
I use it in all of our systems, and it is starting to get awkward: it still
works, if preinstalled, but I now have to get it from oldstable if it
has not been installed yet.
--
Stephen.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xca"
* Package name: xca
Version : 2.2.1-1~bpo10+1
Upstream Author : Christian Hohnstaedt
* URL : https://hohnstaedt.de/xca/
* License : BSD-3-clause
Source: cgit
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Please update cgit to 1.2.3. 1.2.2 brings the ability to configure blame per
repo, and 1.2.3 brings zstd support.
You might want to add a suggest on lua-luaossl too, fwiw.
Release announcements below:
== 1.2.2 ==
In terms of features, this
Le 22/03/2020 à 14:56, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: ocsinventory-server
> Version: 2.5+dfsg1-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packag
package release.debian.org
tags 949112 = stretch pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian stretch.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: xtrlock
Version: 2.8+deb9u1
package release.debian.org
tags 954664 = stretch pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian stretch.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: rails
Version:
package release.debian.org
tags 949925 = stretch pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian stretch.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: cram
Version: 0.7-1+deb9u1
package release.debian.org
tags 948651 = stretch pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian stretch.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: neon27
Version:
201 - 300 of 358 matches
Mail list logo