On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 02:01, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > src/pault.ag/go/ykpiv/ykpiv.go:539:12: _Ctype_struct_ykpiv_state can't be
> > allocated in Go; it is incomplete (or unallocatable)
> > src/pault.ag/go/ykpiv/ykpiv.go:569:11: _Ctype_struct_ykpiv_state can't be
> > allocated in Go; it is
I think this has been reported and fixed in util-linux:
https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/issues/1193
Updating Fedora to the util-linux with that fix backported seems to fix
the issue for me.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 13:04:56 -0700 Sean Whitton
wrote:
> On Wed 18 Nov 2020 at 11:18PM -08, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > First, as a point of order (for which some authoritative guidance from
> > the Secretary, CCed, would potentially prove useful): while the
> > technical committee is empowered to
- This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. -
Hello, Kindly confirm if you can ship to Australia and New Zealand.
Thanks
CEO
Dr Henrik Rawlings
© 2020
Henrik
Group Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
sent from my iPad
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hu Feng
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name : dde-printer
Version : 5.0.1
Upstream Author : 石博文
* URL : https://github.com/linuxdeepin/dde-printer
License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang : C++
Subject: calibre: crashes on start
Package: calibre
Version: 5.5.0+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
After upgrading to version 5.5.0+dfsg-1, calibre crashes on start.
Error logs:
$calibre
Traceback (most recent
Hi Adam,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 9:31 PM Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> Please go ahead.
Thanks, uploaded.
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:00:45 -0700 Sean Whitton
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed 18 Nov 2020 at 11:18PM -08, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > I'd also like to address one other issue here. It would be easy to
> > hypothesize, at this point, that some additional communication (or more
> > verbose
(Going to leave my own opinions on the underlying discussion here
aside, but wanted to highlight/echo this bit:)
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 23:33, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Any inclusion of work into a package necessitates *some* amount of
> development and packaging resources by the maintainer of that
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
* Package name: obs-v4l2sink
Version : 0.1.0 (or git master)
Upstream Author : Han-Tai Chen (CatxFish)
* URL : https://github.com/CatxFish/obs-v4l2sink
* License : GPL2+
Programming
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 2:51 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> remember that tracker is source-based
...
> supports package lookup prefixed with src: or bin:
...
> I would honestly oppose "hiding" and old source package
I think that makes this a wontfix bug, any further thoughts?
--
bye,
pabs
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 02:34:43 +0100, Martin wrote:
> * Package name: obs-v4l2sink
> Version : 0.1.0 (or git master)
> Upstream Author : Han-Tai Chen (CatxFish)
> * URL : https://github.com/CatxFish/obs-v4l2sink
> * License : GPL2+
> Programming Lang: C++
>
On Fri, 2020-11-20 at 03:14 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
For fonts where large coverage is a priority I think we should
ideally list explicitly all languages that are _fully_ covered. Fonts
covering more languages than reasonable to list in a package
description
should then be split into one
On Nov 19, Sven Joachim wrote:
> I am not one of them, but AFAICS that would introduce a fatal circular
> dependency between libc6 and libcrypt1: libc6 needs libcrypt1 to be
> configured before it can be unpacked, but libcrypt1 depends on libc6 so
> it cannot be configured before libc6 is at
Package: ruby-asciidoctor-pdf
Version: 1.5.0~alpha.17.dev-5
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The package `ruby-rouge` can enhance ruby-asciidoctor-pdf by using
`:source-highlighter: rouge` in the source code of the asciidoc file.
So it should be introduced a suggested package.
Cheers,
Source: insighttoolkit4
Followup-For: Bug #724711
I recently discovered that graviton cannot build on x86 because of an
indirect build-dependency on libinsighttoolkit4-dev, which is only
built for x86. I was just going to ask for other architectures to be
enabled, as it is debian policy to enable
11.0-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
[...]
> > Checking for Qt >= 5.2.0 ... yes
> > Checking for libzmq >= 2.0 ...
> > * [pkg-config libzmq --exists]
> > * returned: 1
> > -> no
> >
> > Error: need libzmq >= 2.0!
Package: mirrors
Severity: wishlist
User: mirr...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: mirror-submission
Submission-Type: new
Site: mirror.bizflycloud.vn
Type: leaf
Archive-architecture: ALL amd64 arm64 armel armhf hurd-i386 i386 kfreebsd-amd64
kfreebsd-i386 mips mips64el mipsel powerpc ppc64el s390x
[I have consolidated responses to multiple bits of quoted text here, in
an effort to consolidate responses to variations on the same points, in
the hopes that doing so will avoid proliferating variations on a common
theme.
Also, the title of this bug itself presumes a disputed point of view.]
On
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:26:21AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> There are a lot of fascinating edge cases and precedents and philosophical
> questions about the function of a distribution here, and I think they
> rightfully attract a lot of energy, but I'm worried this is at the cost of
> losing
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: nethack-vulture
Version : ?
Upstream Author : ?
* URL : https://github.com/DanielT/Vulture
* License : Nethack General Public License
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Isometric tiles interface for
Quoting Paul Wise (2020-11-20 02:43:52)
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 6:54 PM Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> > I would indeed not use raw listings of more than 50 entries, but
> > would try find ways to summarize the information most sensibly.
>
> Would it be useful to (automatically) group large
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 04:20:46PM -0800, Tianon Gravi wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 23:33, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Any inclusion of work into a package necessitates *some* amount of
> > development and packaging resources by the maintainer of that package.
> > Even if someone else offers
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
I am maintaining node-fn.name inside JavaScript team, and I would like
to request its removal:
* The package can be drop-in replaced with node-fn-name, which is better
maintained upstream;
* No reverse dependencies.
Thanks,
Andrius
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: rust-clippy
Version : 1.47.0
Upstream Author : The Rust Project Developers
* URL : https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy
* License : Apache-2.0 OR MIT
Programming Lang: Rust
Description : lints to
> The test is failing because the Debian PostgreSQL environment has
> already moved to 12, but this package is still only available for 11,
> so some parts required to test it have already moved to 12.
>
> I'm working on moving pg_config into the dependency cone of
> the postgresql-XX server
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 6:54 PM Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I would indeed not use raw listings of more than 50 entries, but would
> try find ways to summarize the information most sensibly.
Would it be useful to (automatically) group large lists of languages
into families?
Control: tags -1 pending
Control: fixed -1 postgis/3.1.0~alpha1+dfsg-1~exp5
This was already fixed in the experimental branch, the fix for unstable
will be uploaded soon.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
I will get with upstream and submit a patch to bring them up to speed with
the 2.0 api. At that point, the package ought be buildable in unstable
against libnotcurses1, and will also build from libnotcurses2. Thanks for
the heads-up!
--
nick black
to make an apple pie from scratch, one need
Package: audacious
Version: 4.0.5
Severity: Normal
Please consider to upgrade to the current upstream version (4.0.5).
Regards
Jonatan
Package: tweeper
Version: 1.4.2-1
Severity: important
When I try to download the RSS for an Instagram account that does not
exist, tweeper just returns an empty RSS feed and exits with success.
When I try to download the RSS for a Facebook account that does not
exist, tweeper prints a "Page not
Package: spl-dkms
Version: 0.7.12-2+deb10u1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
spl-dkms on stable curently causes linux-image-4.19.0-11-amd64 to fail
to configure with the following error:
Setting up linux-image-4.19.0-11-amd64 (4.19.146-1) ...
I: /initrd.img.old is now a symlink to
Summary: After building a ppc64el QEMU testbed, I met a similar symptom to
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=973038#40
From: Simon McVittie
Subject: Re: autopkgtest-build-qemu support for ppc64el, arm64, armel, i386 UEFI
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 18:49:36 +
> * #926945 (ppc64el
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dtkwidget":
* Package name: dtkwidget
Version : 5.2.2.10-1~exp1
Upstream Author : https://github.com/linuxdeepin/dtkwidget/issues
* URL :
On 2020-11-19 01:01:28, Leon Marz wrote:
>
> cglm (0.7.9-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* New upstream release
>* Bump Standards-Version to 4.5.1
This Standards-Version is not yet recognized by lintian. You can
verify this with lintian, and it is also shown in the lintian section
on
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi!
Stable currently has Tor 0.3.5.10.
Upstream released 0.3.5.11 and 0.3.5.12 since, which bring some security
fixes, update the list of fallback directory servers, and a few
No problem, thanks for your feedback, it's appreciated.
Best regards,
--
Henry-Nicolas Tourneur
mxid: @hntourne:matrix.nilux.be
Le jeudi 19 novembre 2020 à 21:39 +0100, il a écrit :
> You are right. I completely forgot about that old pykeepass installation with
> pip.
> pip uninstall pykeepass
Control: fixed -1 19.0~alpha3+dfsg1-1
Control: close -1
Dear colleagues,
19.0 Alpha3 is fully compatible with Python3 and I expect Beta1 to be uploaded
to unstable as tgere will be no API changes by upsrream as promised.
Closing this bug manually because I forgot mentionung it in a changelog at
Package: postgresql-common
Version: 223.pgdg100+1
Severity: normal
pg_createcluster has an option to include this line in postgresql.conf:
include_dir = 'conf.d'
pg_upgradecluster doesn't copy the files in conf.d to the new cluster
I needed to copy the files manually after the upgrade and
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dde-qt-dbus-factory":
* Package name: dde-qt-dbus-factory
Version : 5.2.0.29-1~exp1
Upstream Author : https://github.com/linuxdeepin/dde-qt-dbus-factory/issues
* URL
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin":
* Package name: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin
Version : 5.0.17+ds.1-1~exp1
Upstream Author : https://github.com/linuxdeepin/qt5platform-plugins/issues
*
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dde-qt5integration":
* Package name: dde-qt5integration
Version : 5.1.0.5-1~exp1
Upstream Author : https://github.com/linuxdeepin/qt5integration/issues
* URL
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 09:06:51PM +, Morledge-Hampton, Benjamin Stuart
wrote:
> > That's strange. I tried to reproduce this here but I get only
> r-cran-lomb (which is the right one and should contain a Git repository
> including the debian/ dir).
>
> I've realized that my
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-10-18 03:38:56)
> Upstream source includes not only the flattened plaintext data,
> but also more rich RDF data.
>
> Please ship the RDF data too.
[Since asked about it on irc...]
I would suggest to use one package for all formats, and store them in
subdirs same
Control: reassign -1 node-yarnpkg
Control: affects -1 gitlab
On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 12:22:30 +0200 Dragos Jarca
wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Upgrade to 13.3.8.1 failed:
>
> Installing node modules...
> + runuser -u gitlab -- sh -c install -d /var/lib/gitlab/.node_modules
> + runuser -u gitlab --
Source: xygrib
Version: 1.2.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linu
Source: deepin-picker
Version: 5.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -c -pipe -g -g -O2 -fde
Source: iannix
Version: 0.9.20~dfsg0-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -c -pipe -g -O2 -fde
Source: connectome-workbench
Version: 1.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/obj-x86
Source: supercollider
Version: 1:3.10.4+repack-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bi
Source: ukui-power-manager
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -c -pipe -O2 -std=
Source: litecoin
Version: 0.18.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -std=c++11 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
Source: librecad
Version: 2.1.3-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -c -pipe -g -fext-nume
Source: zint
Version: 2.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/cc -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-
Source: ghostwriter
Version: 1.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -c -pipe -g -O2 -fde
Source: ktikz
Version: 0.12+ds1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linu
Source: structure-synth
Version: 1.5.0-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -c -g -O2 -fdebug-pre
Source: spirv-tools
Version: 2020.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/obj-x86_64-
Source: deepin-screen-recorder
Version: 5.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -c -pipe -g
Source: meshlab
Version: 2020.06+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bi
Source: ignition-transport
Version: 8.0.0+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin
Source: horizon-eda
Version: 1.2.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Hi Maintainer
During the recent rebuild for Python 3.9 as default, horizon-eda fails
to build from source [1].
I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below.
Regards
Graham
[1]
Ok, James, please do that, and I'll upload the change to msgpack.
I don't think msgpack deserves a RC bug for this in the mean time.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Package: src:libsigrokdecode
Version: 0.5.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye ftbfs
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.9
libsigrokdecode ftbfs with Python 3.9. looks like the headers are detected, but
not the library?
[...]
/bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc
Package: webext-dav4tbsync
Version: 1.23-1
Hi,
Thank you very much for maintaining and updating the tbsync packages in
Debian. The current version of webext-dav4tbsync is now compatible with
thunderbird 78 but it cannot be used as it seems to be out of sync with
webext-tbsync.
When I try to add
Package: src:texworks
Version: 0.6.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye ftbfs
texworks ftbfs in unstable:
[...]
In file included from /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtCore/qlist.h:43,
from /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtCore/qurl.h:47,
from
Package: auditd
Version: 1:2.8.5-3.1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
set log_format = ENRICHED
* What was the outcome of this action?
* What outcome did you expect
Source: deepin-music
Version: 5.0.1+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -c -pipe -g -O2 -fde
Source: calligraplan
Version: 1:3.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/obj-x86_64-
Source: lambda-align2
Version: 2.0.0-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/build/src &
Source: qpdfview
Version: 0.4.18-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -c -pipe -g -O2 -fdebug-pre
Source: freeciv
Version: 2.6.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=
Source: ukui-notification-daemon
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -c -pipe -g
Source: rosegarden
Version: 1:20.06-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linu
Source: pytango
Version: 9.3.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -pthread -
Source: ffmpeg
Version: 7:4.3.1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ffconf.NjlLg
Source: wacomtablet
Version: 3.2.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linu
Source: ser-player
Version: 1.7.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -c -pipe -std=gnu++0x -g
Source: edb-debugger
Version: 1.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linu
Source: wvdial
Version: 1.61-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Package: src:horizon-eda
Version: 1.2.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye ftbfs
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.9
horizon-eda ftbfs in unstable, but it might not cause by Python 3.9.
[...]
make pymodule
make[2]: Entering directory '/<>'
Package libbsd was not found in
Package: spdx-licenses
Version: 3.8+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Package lists https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data as its source.
That git repository is auto-generated.
The true source is
Package: fuse-posixovl
Version: 1.2.20120215+gitf5bfe35-3
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
the description for this package says:
This package extends mount and provides option '-t posixovl'.
However, neither does it extend mount nor does it provide that option (nor
does it work with
Source: sirikali
Version: 1.4.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linu
Source: datovka
Version: 4.9.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -c -g -O0 -std=c++11 -W
Source: deepin-voice-recorder
Version: 5.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -c -pipe -g -g
Source: apt-cacher-ng
Version: 3.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++ -g -O2 -fde
Source: vtk6
Version: 6.3.0+dfsg2-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering direct
Source: simulavr
Version: 1.0.0+git20160221.e53413b-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/lib/
Source: peony-extensions
Version: 3.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -c -pipe -g -O2 -fde
Source: tupi
Version: 0.2+git08-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -c -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-
Source: wpewebkit
Version: 2.30.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ninja: build stopped: subcomm
Source: actiona
Version: 3.10.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -c -pipe -std=c++11 -std=c+
Source: pentobi
Version: 17.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++ -g -O2 -fdebug-pre
Source: qwt
Version: 6.1.4-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -c -pipe -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-
Source: texworks
Version: 0.6.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs bullseye sid
Hi Maintainer
As per reproducible builds [1], texworks recently started failing to
build in testing and unstable.
I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below.
Regards
Graham
[1]
Control: retitle -1 [ROM] Please remove src:biosig4c++ from unstable since it
was replaced by biosig
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:21:54AM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 09:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Version check failed:
> > Your upload
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cglm":
* Package name: cglm
Version : 0.7.9-1
Upstream Author : Recep Aslantas
* URL : https://github.com/recp/cglm
* License : Expat
* Vcs
Source: zulucrypt
Version: 5.7.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/obj-x86_64-
Source: wvstreams
Version: 4.6.1-15
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -c -o ut
101 - 200 of 335 matches
Mail list logo
