Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2022-08-21 21:54:10 -0400, Kunal Mehta wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: lego...@debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to do a transition of libzim 7->8. I've done
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: openfpgaloader
Version : 0.9
* URL : https://github.com/trabucayre/openFPGALoader
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: C/C++
Description
Hi,
Am 31.07.22 um 16:44 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
This is now https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016420
(where the upstream bug which that one is marked as forwarded to has
also the reasoning why support for < 3.16 was dropped which makes the
patch bigger).
I now did a
Control: block -1 by 1016706
It makes more sense for us to do the evolution-data-server transition first.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcdio-paranoia":
* Package name : libcdio-paranoia
Version : 10.2+2.0.1-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL :
Hi again,
Am 28.08.22 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 31.07.22 um 16:44 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
This is now https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016420
(where the upstream bug which that one is marked as forwarded to has
also the reasoning why support for < 3.16 was
Hi,
Am 28.08.22 um 18:37 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 28.08.22 um 17:56 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 28.08.22 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 31.07.22 um 16:44 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
This is now
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016420 (where
the upstream bug which that
Package: autoconf-archive
Version: 20220211-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Forwarded: https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/index.php?10272
Debian adds a custom sysconfig scheme to system python installs,
"posix_local". This is the default scheme, and it redirects local
users' Python module installs to
Package: electronics-radio-dev
Version: 0.3
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: dfo...@gmail.com
electronics-radio-dev recommends this package that isn't available in Debian:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gsmc [2020-10-21] gsmc REMOVED from testing
electronics-radio-dev suggests these packages that
Package: ksh93u+m
Version: 1.0.3-1
Severity: normal
Upgrading today I noticed this warning printed by the package.
update-binfmts: warning: current package is ksh93u+m, but binary format
already installed by ksh
Looking a little closer I find that the package did not transition the
binfmts
Package: xdaliclock
Version: 2.44+debian-3
Upstream 2.45 is out, and uses gtk3 and is antialiased.
I've done a prelim packaging (including reworking the upstream
autotools stuff in a patch), feel free to cannibalize any or all as
you see fit; in salsa.debian.org/bap/xdaliclock
Source: igv
Version: 2.13.0+dfsg-1
Hello, as spot by Ubuntu builders [1] with a more restricted internet access,
your package is trying to call some external websites during testing.
Please use autopkgtests if you really want such tests to run.
[1]
Control: reassign -1 src:netcdf-fortran 4.6.0+ds-1
Control: affects -1 src:abinit
On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 10:16:38PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> Installing the dbgsym packages makes the backtrace a little more
> informative:
>
> Backtrace for this error:
> #0 0x7f889dd4b93f in ???
>
On domingo, 28 de agosto de 2022 23:52:09 (CEST) Ash Joubert wrote:
> I can confirm that, after upgrading libdrumstick packages to 2.7.1-1,
> configuring a FluidSynth MIDI connection restores functionality. The
> missing step was to configure a sound font: the default "default.sf2"
> does not
Package: vmpk
Version: 0.8.7-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@transient.nz
Dear Maintainer,
if I select a "Program" such as "Rhodes Piano", this selection is displayed
after restart but "Acoustic Grand Piano" is played. Program "Rhodes Piano" must
be selected again after restart for this
On 21/08/2022 07.40, Paul Gevers wrote:
Can you ignore the autopkgtest "regression" on ppc64el and let the CVE
fixes into testing?
Linux 5.19 seems to take longer getting into sid
our hosts are running stable and we're using the lxc backend of
autopkgtest. So you'll need to wait until a
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: override
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-b...@lists.debian.org, debian-ker...@lists.debian.org
Debian FTP Master(s),
nfs-utils Commit aba2cc13 [1] (Jan 19, 2022) by Ben Hutchings says:
d/control: Reduce priority
Debian FTP Master(s) and Debian DNS Team,
"Accepted bind9 1:9.18.6-1 (source amd64 all) into unstable, unstable":
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1357381
apparently reverted the Priority for bind9-libs from "optional" back
to "standard".
Please change the Priority for bind9-libs from
On Sun, 28 Aug 2022 at 19:27, Tobias Frost wrote:
> So, even with the switch, the build system needs it at least at
> configure time, which is the reason why it failed at the second time.
> (make distclean was the command that failed; as the removal of lua
> was only directly before the build, it
Source: biomaj3
Version: 3.1.22-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: biomaj3-process
Version: 3.0.18-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: biomaj3-user
Version: 3.0.12-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: beaker
Version: 1.11.0-1.1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: behave
Version: 1.2.6-4
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: backblaze-b2
Version: 1.3.8-5
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: bcbio
Version: 1.2.9-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: biomaj3-daemon
Version: 3.0.24-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: biomaj3-core
Version: 3.0.27-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: biomaj3-download
Version: 3.2.8-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: chaussette
Version: 1.3.0+git20170419+82ac44a-0.4
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug
Source: check-manifest
Version: 0.46-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: click-man
Version: 0.4.1-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: commando
Version: 1.0.0-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: annexremote
Version: 1.6.0-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: anorack
Version: 0.2.7-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: ansible
Version: 5.5.0-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: apt-xapian-index
Version: 0.53
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: blockdiag
Version: 2.0.1+dfsg-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: blinker
Version: 1.4+dfsg1-0.5
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: case
Version: 1.5.3+dfsg-5
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: celery
Version: 5.2.6-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: createrepo-c
Version: 0.17.0-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: crccheck
Version: 1.0-4
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: binwalk
Version: 2.3.3+dfsg1-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: biomaj3-cli
Version: 3.1.11-3
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: flask-restful
Version: 0.3.9-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: freeipa
Version: 4.9.8-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: funcparserlib
Version: 1.0.0-0.1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: freezegun
Version: 1.1.0-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: git-buildpackage
Version: 0.9.28
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: gdebi
Version: 0.9.5.7+nmu6
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: git-build-recipe
Version: 0.3.6
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: galpy
Version: 1.8.0-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: gfapy
Version: 1.2.3+dfsg-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: imbalanced-learn
Version: 0.9.1-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: insilicoseq
Version: 1.5.4-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: ipython-genutils
Version: 0.2.0-5
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: ipywidgets
Version: 6.0.0-9
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: ipython
Version: 7.31.1-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: gramps
Version: 5.1.5-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: hdf-compass
Version: 0.7~b8-3
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: hyperspy
Version: 1.6.1-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: i8c
Version: 0.0.6-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: influxdb-python
Version: 5.3.1-3
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: git-cola
Version: 3.12.0-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: gnome-keysign
Version: 1.2.0-3
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: fuzzywuzzy
Version: 0.18.0-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: gallery-dl
Version: 1.22.4-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: mistune0
Version: 0.8.4-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: mistral
Version: 14.0.0-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: modernize
Version: 0.7-3
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: moksha.common
Version: 1.2.5-5
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: mom
Version: 0.6.0-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: murano
Version: 1:13.0.0-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: lomiri-url-dispatcher
Version: 0.1.0-7
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it
Source: manila-ui
Version: 7.0.0-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: mirtop
Version: 0.4.25-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: mistral-dashboard
Version: 14.0.0-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it
Source: metaconfig
Version: 0.1.4a1-7
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: neo
Version: 0.10.2-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: netplan.io
Version: 0.105-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: neutron-tempest-plugin
Version: 1.9.0-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it
Source: nosexcover
Version: 1.0.11-1.2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: nrpe-ng
Version: 0.2.0-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: mypaint
Version: 2.0.1-4
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: namecheap
Version: 0.0.3-3
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: nipy
Version: 0.5.0-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: nibabel
Version: 3.2.2-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: muttdown
Version: 0.3.5-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: mwic
Version: 0.7.8-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: pykafka
Version: 2.7.0-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: pynfft
Version: 1.3.2-6
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: pynn
Version: 0.10.0-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: py-radix
Version: 0.10.0-4
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that
Source: pyrfc3339
Version: 1.1-3
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means that your
Source: python-bayespy
Version: 0.5.22-2
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: python-biom-format
Version: 2.1.12-1
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it
Source: python-biplist
Version: 1.0.3-4
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: python-airspeed
Version: 0.5.19-3
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
Source: python-anyjson
Version: 0.3.3-4
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: nose-rm
Dear Maintainer,
Your package still uses nose [1], which is an obsolete testing framework for
Python, dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3].
If you received this bug report, it means
101 - 200 of 517 matches
Mail list logo
