SCons 4.0.1 is fairly old and doesn't seem to be compatible with Python
3.10.
The latest SCons 4.4.0 is available and works fine with Python 3.10
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 11:45 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: scons
> Version: 4.0.1+dfsg-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags:
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.6.1.1
Severity: minor
Hi!
I'm attaching a few patches fixing spacing and typographical issues.
For the quotes fix, I personally highly prefer UTF-8 character pairs
such as «», “”, ‘’, but went with the conservative ASCII ones '' as
that tends to cause less
I was looking at this bug the other day trying to determine why
git-annex was not in testing, and did not realize it was due to this
dbus issue. My mail below digs into it, if the issue is still
happening.
- Forwarded message from Joey Hess -
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 12:48:21 -0400
From:
Package: pokerth-data
Version: 1.1.2-1.1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
we are currently removing the old gsfonts-x11 package and replace it
by fonts-urw-base35, which contains the real fonts (replaces gsfonts)
as well as the symlinks and fonts.scale/fonts.alias voodoo, which is
needed for
On Sunday, 18 September 2022 13:02:47 CEST no2spam wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 5.10.140-1
>
> dmesg of Liquorix 5.19 kernel on the same machine (using Antix-21 (Debian
> bullseye without systemd):
Why do you think the output of some 'random' 5.19 kernel is relevant for a bug
in
Moin Thorsten!
Thorsten Alteholz schrieb am Montag, den 12. September 2022:
Sorry for my delayed answer, I missed to subscribe to this bug report
and didn't notice your reply earlier :-(
> there are reverse dependencies that needs to be taken care of:
The new source package fonts-urw-base35
Package: libinventor1
Version: 2.1.5-10-24
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
we are currently removing the old gsfonts-x11 package and replace it
by fonts-urw-base35, which contains the real fonts (replaces gsfonts)
as well as the symlinks and fonts.scale/fonts.alias voodoo, which is
needed for
Package: openssh-client
Version: 1:9.0p1-1+b1
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I recently flashed my router with OpenWrt and had not (yet) defined a
password for the (root) user.
Trying to do ``ssh-copy-id r...@openwrt.lan`` resulted in a hang
process. Doing ``ssh
On Sun, 18 Sep 2022 at 13:54:53 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> What you just quoted was just the e-d-s part.
>
> There's s still
>
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libsoup3.html
We don't need every package using libsoup2.4 to move to libsoup3, only
the ones that get an indirect
On Sun, 18 Sep 2022 16:15:28 +0200 Helmut Grohne wrote:
[usrmerge on overlayfs]
>
> I recommend turning the check around. First actually attempt to perform
> the conversion. If that happens to fails, check for overlayfs and
> conditionally emit the helpful message. That way, conversion actually
Package: wireplumber
Version: 0.4.11-5
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@brinin.org
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
Package: btrfs-progs
Version: 5.19-1
Severity: wishlist
Hey.
There's a new 5.19.1 out which fixes amongst others an annyoing
error message when checking a fs with free space chache v2.
Cheers,
Chris
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org, xtp...@packages.debian.org
Please remove the xtpcpp source package from unstable. All its binary
packages have been token over by i2masschroq.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
On Sun, 18 Sep 2022 16:15:28 +0200 Helmut Grohne
wrote:
> Package: usrmerge
> Version: 30+nmu1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: essential packages should not fail to install
> Control: affects -1 + src:mmdebstrap
>
> If you happen to be on an overlayfs filesystem (doesn't have to be /)
> and
Hi,
thank you for your patience.
But we need some more information about the issue. Next time you
experience the issue, can you create a debug bundle using
syslog-ng-debun -rst 60
command.
Also, if you could, a core file, generated when the issue can be
experienced could help the investigation
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "streamlink" for a new
upstream version 5.0.0.
* Package name: streamlink
Version : 5.0.0-1
Upstream Author : Streamlink Team
* URL :
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: block -1 by 1019974
Dear Release team,
I would like to upgrade Qt 5 from 5.15.4 to 5.15.6. The packages are prepared
in experimental. As usual, packages which use private ABI
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022, Boyuan Yang wrote:
X-Debbugs-CC: n...@debian.org
Hi Noel,
I believe the a upstream version 2.0.1 was just released. It has been more
than 4 years since last maintainer upload; are you still going to maintain
wget2 in Debian? If not, please feel free to let us know so that
Package: claws-mail
Version: 3.17.8-1+b1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
when using the auto-configure feature of a new account creation only
"_submission._tcp.example.net" SRV record is queried, but not
"_submissions._tcp.example.net". If example.net domain only has the
latter
Hi,
finally I was able to do some investigation related to this ticket.
The syslog-ng manpage need to be updated and I'll do that.
On the other hand, the ${localstatedir} and the ${exec_prefix} is more
like an upstream decision in how to handle things, than an actual bug.
For some reason, they
Package: usrmerge
Version: 30+nmu1
Severity: serious
Justification: essential packages should not fail to install
Control: affects -1 + src:mmdebstrap
If you happen to be on an overlayfs filesystem (doesn't have to be /)
and then install usrmerge into a chroot on that filesystem (for instance
by
Control: tags -1 pending
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 06:21:52PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: maliit-framework
> Version: 2.2.1-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During a
Package: apache2
Version: 2.4.54-2
After updating a debian/testing amd64 an apache based https front-end
for a local http server (non-apache) failed to work. The error log
showed lines like
[core:notice] [pid 817:tid 140108209478976] AH00052: child pid 427563
exit signal Aborted (6)
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 11:57:48PM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> From my side, I'd be fine with the TC pausing any action on this issue and
> waiting for our mail to d-devel first. This is assuming that if there is no
> opposition to the DPKG_ROOT idea, that Steve then
Source: glew
Version: 2.2.0-4
Severity: normal
Hello,
the list of symbols in debian/libglew2.2.symbols is ignored since the
soname does not match.
| dpkg-gensymbols: warning: new libraries appeared in the symbols file:
libGLEW.so.2.2
| dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some libraries disappeared in the
Thanks to Helmut, that plan sounds really good to me!
A few little details to add (but they do not influence the suggested
upgrade procedure):
One actually has to create NEW repos for borg2 and then has the options:
- to just have the future backup archives in these new repos, or
- to "borg2
Package: libhyperscan5
Version: 5.4.0-2
Severity: important
Preparing to unpack .../030-libhyperscan5_5.4.0-2_amd64.deb ...
Aborting installation because of missing SSSE3 extension.
dpkg: error processing archive
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-GAUvCn/030-libhyperscan5_5.4.0-2_amd64.deb (
--unpack):
new
control: fixed -1 2.4.2-2
The URL has been fixed in 2.4.2-2.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi!
It seems that we've broken booting Xen PVH hosts using grub-xen-host -
see #1017944. The previous bullseye update (2.06-3~deb11u1) also
pulled the same problem into bullseye.
Package: nextcloud-desktop
Version: 3.6.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
nextcloud-desktop requires qml-module-qtquick-dialogs to show its GUI since
version 3.6.0, but the package currently doesn't depend on it.
$ nextcloud --logfile - | grep -i qml
2022-09-18 13:38:45:694 [ warning
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 08:11:03AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I think the right thing for putty here is for upstream to remove the
> HTML from their VCS and tarballs, then add the generation process to
> their build system and continuous integration, so that they always know
> when there are
Hi,
What you just quoted was just the e-d-s part.
There's s still
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libsoup3.html
Regards,
Rene
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.22.2
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/uscan
Many upstreams have the concept of prereleases and stable releases, or
development branches and stable releases, for example:
* GTK, GLib, Flatpak, SDL, dbus: x.odd.z is a prerelease, x.even.z is stable
-
I was able to fix that bug by taking Math::BigInt and Math::BigFloat
from perl 5.36. They work seamless.
I will reassign the bug to perl-modules.
--
Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16Klaus Ethgen
Fingerprint: 85D4
Control: severity -1 serious
Nautilus 43 has been uploaded to Unstable.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
Control: severity -1 important
Lowering severity to important since riscv64 is not a release
architecture yet.
Cheers
Ole
Sean, et al,
On Sat 03 Sep 2022 22:39:18 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Sun 28 Aug 2022 at 07:42PM -05, Daniel Lewart wrote:
>
> > Debian FTP Master(s) and Debian DNS Team,
> >
> > "Accepted bind9 1:9.18.6-1 (source amd64 all) into unstable, unstable":
> >
Control: severity -1 serious
We are doing the Nautilus 43 transition now.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.10.140-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: no2spam...@gmx.com
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Kernel doesn't use correct sound driver for Apollo Lake cpu.
On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 10:57:43 +0200 andrew glaeser
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> While my upgraded system seems OK now, I can also log in as before wit
x2go
> and see the same xfce-desktop, and I can install packages.
>
> But, big but, the stable Hugin-source PPA
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2022-09-11 17:07:27 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
>
> We are ready to do the nautilus transition now. It will have sourceful
> uploads of:
> - nautilus
> - python-nautilus
> - file-roller
> - gnome-terminal
> - gtkhash
>
> All except for
Package: roger-router
Version: 2.2.1-1
Severity: minor
X-Debbugs-Cc: qt...@disroot.org
Dear Maintainer,
The link under External Resources > Homepage [www.tabos.org] is dead.
The current website is https://www.tabos.org/projects/rogerrouter/
On 2022-09-17 18:21, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the mirrors package:
#1019145: mirror submission for mirror.iranserver.com
It has been closed by Julien Cristau .
Their explanation is attached below
Package: snapshot.debian.org
Severity: normal
Transcribing weasel suggestion from IRC:
Snapshot could use NULL value on node.last to represent the current run.
Since most files do not change between runs, that would significantly
reduce the number of UPDATE needed for an import run, speeding up
Source: vcmi
Version: 0.99+dfsg+git20220621.54fab9f0-3
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer(s), josch,
vcmi build depends on libluajit-5.1-dev but that got removed on
ppc64el because it doesn't work correcty on that architecture and
noone volunteers to fix *and maintain* it on that architecture.
Package: snapshot.debian.org
Severity: normal
Having files stored into an object-like storage could improve cost and
performence over the conventional storage that snapshot is currently
using. (Currently using over 130 TB!)
Multiple componants needs to access snapshot farm. The importer, the web
Julien,
We have a loading time of 580 ms on https://mirror.serverion.com/
Server is doing 12G approx of the 20G maximum. We rsync the files and generate
the file ourselves.
I will implement the ftpsync later today and send you an update.
With kind regards,
Desmond van der Winden
Package: snapshot.debian.org
Severity: normal
Snapshot uses SHA-1 hash to refer and deduplicate files. That hash is
considered insecure and should be deprecated from snapshot.
It should be replaced by secure hash function such as SHA-256, SHA-512 or
BLAKE2.
--
Baptiste Beauplat - lyknode
Typo in my patch, it should be "if (obuf->flag & RB_HEAD)", not "if
(obuf->flag | RB_HEAD)"
Hi,
I opened an issue on the upstream bug tracker:
https://github.com/progval/Limnoria/issues/1517
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi all.
I'm about to fix this bug. And I'll do NMU of this package. The attached
file is the debdiff of the NMU. I'll wait for 10 days if no other
complains about the fix. And I'll upload to delay/10 queue.
So this bug is basically because #897845 and #834472 is not fixed
properly by me
Package: w3m
Version: 0.5.3+git20220429-1+b1
When opening a page in w3m that contains an element that contains
a tag, w3m will use that svg title as the page title.
An example of a page to demonstrate this problem is github.com. The
real title of github.com is "GitHub: Where the world builds
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.35.html
On 2022-09-14 22:17:47 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc:
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 libzim8 8.0.0-2
Control: retitle -2 libzim8: remove unnecessary Conflicts+Replaces
Control: submitter -2 !
On 2022-09-03 09:26:34 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2022-08-28 21:45:35 -0400, Kunal Mehta wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 8/28/22 11:18,
Package: libatk1.0-0
Version: 2.46.0-1
libatk1.0-0 (2.46.0-1) pulls in at-spi2-core (and
gsettings-desktop-schemas). It would be really nice if we could
opt out of at-spi2-core. at-spi2-core is very intrusive and by itself it
does not add any value.
root@brutus:~# apt-get full-upgrade
Control: reopen -1
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
It seems you're still not using ftpsync? What software are you using
instead for the mirror?
Also, connections seem to be quite slow, at least 5s and up to 40s for
me to get a single small file, in a few attempts.
Cheers,
Julien
On Sun, Sep
Control: reassign -1 lxqt-build-tools 0.11.0-0.1
Control: affects -1 src:libfm-qt
Control: fixed -1 lxqt-build-tools/0.11.0-1
Control: close -1
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 08:55:01AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on
Control: tags -1 upstream pending
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/rasterio/rasterio/issues/2592
Thanks for reporting this issue, it's forwarded upstream and worked
around in git by marking the test as xfail.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182
Source: cabal-debian
Version: 5.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: emacspeak
Version: 53.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: emacs-websocket
Version: 1.13-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: limesuite
Version: 20.10.0+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: singularity-container
Version: 3.10.2+ds2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: debian-reference
Version: 2.93
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: haskell-hledger-interest
Version: 1.6.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: scalable-cyrfonts
Version: 4.18
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: package-lint-el
Version: 0.16-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: elisp-refs
Version: 1.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: undercover-el
Version: 0.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: libqtxdg
Version: 3.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: node-rollup-plugin-node-polyfills
Version: 0.2.1+dfsg-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: shellia
Version: 5.7.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: maint-guide
Version: 1.2.51
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: key-chord-el
Version: 0.6-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot
Source: use-package
Version: 2.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering
Source: elisp-bug-hunter
Version: 1.3.1+repack-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pcre2el
Version: 1.8-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: binutils
Version: 2.38.90.20220713-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]:
Source: cycle-quotes
Version: 0.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: ebib
Version: 2.38.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: shut-up
Version: 0.3.3-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: ogre-1.12
Version: 1.12.10+dfsg2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: helpful-el
Version: 0.19-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: ido-ubiquitous
Version: 4.14-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: markdown-toc-el
Version: 0.1.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: emacs-web-server
Version: 1.5.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: with-simulated-input-el
Version: 2.4+git20200216.29173588-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: dumb-jump-el
Version: 0.5.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: haskell-snap-templates
Version: 1.0.0.2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: emacs-ivy
Version: 0.13.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: elfeed
Version: 3.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: esup-el
Version: 0.7.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: gnuplot-mode
Version: 1:0.7.0-2014-12-31-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: gap
Version: 4.11.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: link-grammar
Version: 5.10.5~dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: haskell-x509-util
Version: 1.6.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: circe
Version: 2.11-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: node-katex
Version: 0.16.2+~cs6.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: paredit-everywhere
Version: 0.4-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot
101 - 200 of 383 matches
Mail list logo
