Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: 1030...@bugs.debian.org, 1030...@bugs.debian.org
According to the discussion in #1030631 [1], fdflush should be
deprecated and removed from the archive because:
* the packaged program is obsolete (last updated in 1995),
* pretty much
Package: rust-all
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: vmxevils...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
We need to upgrade Rust to 1.66.1 to receive new language features and also
help the desktop team to track the newer version of Firefox.
For example compiling gecko from firefox git gives the error
Dear maintainer,
I've uploaded an NMU for wcc (versioned as 0.0.2+dfsg-4.2).
The diff is attached to this message.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru wcc-0.0.2+dfsg/debian/changelog wcc-0.0.2+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- wcc-0.0.2+dfsg/debian/changelog 2020-03-21 19:02:12.0 +0200
+++
On 07/02/23 at 09:49 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 07/02/2023 09.41, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > But with >3 source packages to monitor, we're not able to verify new
> > releases each hour. It's a process that is spread over a longer period...
>
> I don't know if this is already done,
On 07/02/23 at 09:41 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 07 Feb 2023, xevilstar wrote:
> > I have noticed that on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux the new
> > upstream version takes ages to update.
>
> How long is "ages" for you?
>
> > for example now it displays "A
> > new
Package: eclipse-titan
Version: 8.2.0-1
Severity: normal
Unfortunately titan 8.2.0 has many known regressions in encoding messages all
accross
our test suites, so it is completely unusable. As 8.3.0 with bugfixes has been
released already on January 16, it would be great to upgrade the debian
Like Andreas said it would be perfect if the package linux could be scanned
more often
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 9:49 AM Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 07/02/2023 09.41, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > But with >3 source packages to monitor, we're not able to verify new
> > releases each hour. It's a
Package: debuerreotype
Version: 0.15-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for debuerreotype (versioned as 0.15-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell me if I should
cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru debuerreotype-0.15/debian/changelog
Dear maintainer,
I've uploaded an NMU for python-ulmo (versioned as 0.8.8+dfsg1-1.1).
The diff is attached to this message.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru python-ulmo-0.8.8+dfsg1/debian/changelog python-ulmo-0.8.8+dfsg1/debian/changelog
--- python-ulmo-0.8.8+dfsg1/debian/changelog 2022-01-26
Hi,
I went looking to try and see where the check was being carried out, and
it's in:
/usr/lib/libdvd-pkg/b-i_libdvdcss.sh
apt-get check >/dev/null 2>&1
if [ "$?" -ne 0 ]; then
echo "${PKGI}: \`apt-get check\` failed, you may have broken
packages. Aborting..."
exit 0
fi
Which is
Control: severity -1 important
thanks
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 06:28:32AM +0100, Nicolas Patrois wrote:
> tzdata can’t be configured:
> installed tzdata package post-installation script subprocess returned error
> exit status 10
> Thus, ntpsec can’t be upgraded (it depends on tzdata’s
severity 994081 important
quit
Hi,
After basically any apt upgrade, I get:
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.36-8):
libdvd-pkg: Checking orig.tar integrity...
/usr/src/libdvd-pkg/libdvdcss_1.4.3.orig.tar.bz2: OK
libdvd-pkg: `apt-get check` failed, you may have broken packages.
Aborting...
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> Am 06.02.2023 um 22:45 teilte Richard Frith-Macdonald mit:
> > FYI I implemented the suggested change in gnustep-make trunk in the
> > git repository, after having tried it out with TeXinfo 5 and 6
>
> I can't find your changes on salsa. ;-(
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 01:23:28AM +, Nick Morrott wrote:
>...
>
> Dear Adrian,
Dear Nick,
>...
> I'm happy for the NMU to stay in DELAYED/1 and will have a look at
> getting the new upstream packaged over the next days.
that sounds good, but please wait until my NMU is in testing before
On 07/02/2023 09.41, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
But with >3 source packages to monitor, we're not able to verify new
releases each hour. It's a process that is spread over a longer period...
I don't know if this is already done, but from historic release data it
might be possible to derive
Hello,
On Tue, 07 Feb 2023, xevilstar wrote:
> I have noticed that on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux the new
> upstream version takes ages to update.
How long is "ages" for you?
> for example now it displays "A
> new upstream version is available: 6.2~rc6" while on
>
Hi Patrick
On 2023-02-06 10:24:57 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
>
> Please remove the package from testing. I have decided that it is better
> to release bookworm without the whole
Package: request-tracker4
Version: 4.4.6+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: maintainer
request-tracker5 is the current release; we don't want to release
request-tracker4 any more.
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: vmxevils...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
I have noticed that on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux the new upstream
version takes ages to
update. for example now it displays "A new upstream version is available:
6.2~rc6" while on
On 2023-02-07 08:33, Graham Inggs wrote:
Hi Drew
I think python3-scipy should declare a Breaks on python3-skbio less
than the version in unstable (0.5.8-3).
This should sort out the autopkgtest regressions of emperor,
python-skbio itself, q2-metadata and q2-quality-control, which are all
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi,
On 06/02/2023 12:43, Guillem Jover wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:dpkg
Hi!
Please pre-approve the dpkg 1.21.20
201 - 221 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
