Package: icedtea-netx
Version: 1.8.8-2
I pass some extra scaling option on my system to JAVA so i can actually
read something on a 4K laptop display so the -version call in
javaws.sh receives a string like
'Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dsun.java2d.uiScale=2.0 openjdk version
"11.0.20"...'
on
merged - https://github.com/MariaDB/server/pull/2995
Package: python3-compyle
Version: 0.8.1-8
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: antonio.valent...@tiscali.it
Dear Maintainer,
apparently one of the build dependencies of compyle (pocl-opencl-icd) is
no longer available on the ppc64el and s390x.
This prevents the migration of compyle to testing.
Hi Dima,
Le mardi 16 janvier 2024 à 15:06 -0800, Dima Kogan a écrit :
> Hi. I'm chasing down
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/1060986
>
> The problem is that mrcal uses libdogleg, which contains
>
> typedef struct
> {
> cholmod_common common;
>
> } dogleg_solverContext_t;
>
>
Package: clang-16
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
the problem initially was described in # 1060887 but postgres maintainer told
me, it's a clang problem. So, here I am.
The minimal reproducible example of debian/control follows:
Source: cross-deps-problem
Build-Depends: debhelper (>=
I want to own kytos-sphinx-theme
Source: giara
Version: 1.0.1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: wuruil...@loongson.cn
Dear Maintainer,
Please modify the control file to support loong64 arch.
wuruilong
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unreleased
APT policy: (500, 'unreleased'), (500, 'unstable')
Package: obs-build
Tags: upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: unit...@debian.org
Hi,
obs-build has its own implementation of debootstrap in init_buildsystem.
Unlike other implementations, it does not ensure that packages from the
essential set have been configured before unpacking non-essential
packages. The
control: tags -1 +moreinfo
> To reproduce, I used the following toy module:
> $ find -type f -exec printf '\n%s\n' {} \; -exec cat {} \;
next time, please setup a throw-away repo somewhere like
github.com/gitlab.com, cause it takes too long to setup a reproduce
environment like this.
> With the
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hey Dylan and people from the multimedia team.
I'd have made a PR at:
https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/libaacs/-/merge_requests/2
which packages the already built aacs_info in a new libaacs-bin
package.
Would be nice if this could be reviewed, merged and a new
tags -1 + fixed-upstream patch
thanks
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:30:40AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: openafs-modules-dkms
> Version: 1.8.10-2
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> openafs-modules-dkms fails to build a module for Linux 6.7 that was just
> uploaded to experimental:
Dear Maintainers,
Would it be possible to consider a merge request[1] that addresses this issue?
Alternatively, we can update the package to the upstream version 3.1.1.
Best Regards,
Vladimir.
[1]https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/exec-maven-plugin/-/merge_requests/2
On 1/16/24 20:39, Jens Ritter wrote:
Upstream provides an update for PHP8.2-Errors
(https://www.nagvis.org/downloads/changelog/1.9.36)
That's already in testing & unstable, see:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/nagvis
Is there any way possible to include this changes ?
I doubt the
On 2024-01-17 at 10:22, Bo YU wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First sorry without contacting here before NMU.
Welcome!
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "endless-sky":
I'm not a DD, but I gave this a look and have a couple comments.
> * Vcs :
Source: srst2
Version: 0.2.0
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: wuruil...@loongson.cn
Dear Maintainer,
Please modify the file to support the loong64 architecture, the content is as
follows:
debian/tests/control:5:Architecture: amd64 arm64 loong64 mips64el ppc64el
riscv64 sh4
wuruilong
-- System
Source: httrack
Version: 3.49.4
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
The text
"IMPORTANT NOTE: DANGEROUS OPTION, ONLY SUITABLE FOR EXPERTS
USE IT WITH EXTREME CARE"
which appears after the '%!' option is formatted as if both lines were further
options
The attached small patch fixes this. I'm no groff
On 1/16/24 20:36, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
Hello,
Javascript/Npm are not my cup of tea; so, please receive many thanks
about the help you provided to my poor packaging efforts.
If node-html5-qrcode happens to be dfsg-free, which should be the right
umbrella to host it on salsa.d.o?
Hi, apologies, but I've transitioned to another task, and the
estimated time for CDEmu is approximately 6 months. So whoever
completes their task first can take care of the CDEmu maintenance.
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:49 AM Matteo Bini wrote:
>
> Control: owner 237925 Matteo Bini
>
> Hi
Hi Nick,
Are you still working on the zig package?
I'd be happy to help you fix any problems that remain.
Kind regards,
Maytham
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi!
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:39 PM Dominik George wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Here I am not a member of DebianEdu team and told if am not a member
> > of one team there is no reason to do team upload.
> > Ideally, I should contact the team to join in or tell team I am going
> > to fix ftbfs issue.
>
Source: libjogl2-java
Version: please add support for loong64
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: wuruil...@loongson.cn
Dear Maintainer,
Please refer to the attached patch to support the loong64 arch.
wuruilong
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unreleased
APT policy:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "notes-tree":
* Package name : notes-tree
Version : 1.2-1
Upstream contact : Dmitry Sviridov <1000hz.radiow...@gmail.com>
* URL : https://gitlab.com/44100Hz/NotesTree/-/tree/dev
*
I managed to get this package to build, and I belive it actually is
required. Rekor is using it for "rekor-cli version":
root@vello:~# rekor-cli version
_ _ __ ___ _ ___
| _ \ | | | |/ / / _ \ | _ \ / ___| | | |_ _|
|
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon Josefsson
* Package name: golang-github-common-nighthawk-go-figure
Version : 0.0~git20210622.734e95f-1
Upstream Author : Daniel Deutsch
* URL : https://github.com/common-nighthawk/go-figure
* License : Expat
control: fixed -1 1.52.0-2
Hi Jordi,
please find the same patch here on salsa:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/nano/-/merge_requests/2
Note that nano is part of the bootstrap set, so it has to be
converted sooner than later (before base-files can be changed).
Chris
On Sat, 13 Jan 2024, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Package: python3-wxgtk4.0
Version: 4.2.0+dfsg-3
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: sm...@smurf.noris.de
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/wx/__init__.py contains:
from wx.core import *
del core
del wx
This doesn't work on my system. "wx.core" does
Package: libsuitesparse-dev
Version: 1:7.3.1+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: none, Dima Kogan
Hi. I'm chasing down
http://bugs.debian.org/1060986
The problem is that mrcal uses libdogleg, which contains
typedef struct
{
cholmod_common common;
}
On Sat, 13 Jan 2024, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Package: python3-wxgtk4.0
Version: 4.2.1+dfsg-3
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: sm...@smurf.noris.de
Installing the version from Testing says
import wx.core
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File
Hello Mate,
Thanks for letting us know. I just tried with 2.12~rc1-13 and no luck.
I'll wait for 2.12 and let you know if it fixes my issue.
Thanks,
--
Nicolas Haller
On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 07:51:22 + Mate Kukri
wrote:
Hello,
Just letting you know that the 2.12 merge is in progress, and
moutaz
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "RPGMod":
* Package name : RPGMod
Version : 1.3.0
Upstream contact : admi...@peq42.com
* URL : http://peq42.com
* License : MIT
* Vcs : https://peq42.com/downloads/RPGmod%20-%20Linux.deb
Control: retitle -1 libshumate: FTBFS: Couldn't find include 'GObject-2.0.gir'
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 at 20:43:20 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Couldn't find include 'GObject-2.0.gir' (search path:
> > '['/usr/share/gir-1.0', '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gir-1.0',
> >
Control: reassign 1058495 src:cage
Control: forcemerge -1 1058495
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Source: gnutls28
Version: 3.8.2-1
Severity: important
Tags: security upstream
Forwarded: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/issues/1522
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Control: found -1 3.7.9-2+deb12u1
Control: found -1 3.7.1-5+deb11u4
Hi,
The following vulnerability was
Source: gnutls28
Version: 3.8.2-1
Severity: important
Tags: security upstream
Forwarded: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/issues/1521
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for gnutls28.
CVE-2024-0567[0]:
| A vulnerability was
This might be https://bugs.debian.org/1060687
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
Control: forcemerge -1 1058495
On dinsdag 16 januari 2024 20:29:22 CET you wrote:
> Source: cage
> Version: 0.1.5-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
It's a known problem, see
Version: 0.11
Hi Adam,
Thanks for your report.
The run function in Update.pm has been removed and merged into Enable.pm
since extrepo 0.10, which means that this bug should be resolved now.
However, I forgot to close the bug report at the time.
Doing so now.
Thanks,
--
Étienne Mollier, on 2024-01-12:
> Rebecca N. Palmer, on 2023-12-14:
> > This autopkgtest, and particularly test_reconstruct_rumba, is slow enough
> > that it sometimes times out and fails. I think this is varying hardware
> > speed and not a random hang because failure seems to correlate with the
package release.debian.org
tags 1057179 = bookworm pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: mariadb
Version:
Il 16/01/2024 20:29, Lucas Nussbaum ha scritto:
CMake binary for host machine is not cached
CMake binary missing from cross or native file, or env var undefined.
Trying a default CMake fallback at cmake
Did not find CMake 'cmake'
Found CMake: NO
Dependency lookup for libwacom with method 'cmake'
Am Di., 16. Jan. 2024 um 20:03 Uhr schrieb Julian
:
>
>
> > Fair point. We could maybe make it so g-s-p is only a recommended
> > dependency
>
> That is what this request is requesting. Just a change from depend to
> recommend
>
> > and modify the code so when g-s-p is not available, it
> > falls
Hi,
I am sending the proposed patch to add the exfat module to initrd:
diff --git a/backend/initramfs-tools/live.hook
b/backend/initramfs-tools/live.hook
index
ff8f4210690e21961dd5e8c3f1d7b3a5b14d4167..7c476ea6159c0664e47497f82145b6da8391
100755
--- a/backend/initramfs-tools/live.hook
+++
Source: flask-mongoengine
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Package: nagvis
Version: 1:1.9.34-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
the provided nagvis-package does not work out-of-the-box. It only
provides this Error-Message in the Browser:
Error: (0) Creation of dynamic property GlobalMainCfg::$PUCACHE is deprecated
URL:
Source: syncthingtray
Version: 1.3.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering
Control: block -1 by 1060884
Am 16.01.24 um 05:04 schrieb zhangdandan:
The swupdate source package (pull from sid) was compiled successfully on my
local loong64 rootfs environment.
But refer to other architectures, maybe we need to add additional dependency
support in d/control and d/rules.
I
Source: gnome-settings-daemon
Version: 45.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: apertium-eu-en
Version: 0.3.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: apertium-en-gl
Version: 0.5.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl
Version: 3.002
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: trash-cli
Version: 0.23.2.13.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: golang-github-go-kit-kit
Version: 0.10.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: c-evo-dh
Version: 1.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: bdebstrap
Version: 0.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
>
Source: flask-restful
Version: 0.3.9-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: lookatme
Version: 2.5.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: wavbreaker
Version: 0.16-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
>
Source: python-watchgod
Version: 0.8.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: moment-timezone.js
Version: 0.5.43+dfsg-1+2023c
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: transgui
Version: 5.18.0+dfsg-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: svtplay-dl
Version: 3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: cinnamon-control-center
Version: 5.8.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: sccache
Version: 0.7.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: libervia-pubsub
Version: 0.4.0+hg488-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: octave-divand
Version: 1.1.2+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: octave-splines
Version: 1.3.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: pygame-sdl2
Version: 8.1.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
Source: apertium-isl-eng
Version: 0.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: click
Version: 0.5.0-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory
Source: aiohttp-jinja2
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: octave-zeromq
Version: 1.5.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: winff
Version: 1.6.2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: xeus-python
Version: 0.15.10+~0.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld:
Source: sphinxcontrib-bibtex
Version: 2.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: scikit-fmm
Version: 2022.08.15-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: guestfs-tools
Version: 1.52.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[6]: Entering
Source: python-flask-httpauth
Version: 4.5.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: libshumate
Version: 1.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: dqlite
Version: 1.16.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering
Source: h5z-zfp
Version: 1.1.0+git20221021-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]:
Source: octave-sockets
Version: 1.4.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: cthreadpool
Version: 0.0+git20201207.b259a6e-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: khard
Version: 0.19.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: ddrescueview
Version: 0.4.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: lomiri-system-settings
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: distro-info
Version: 1.7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: wacomtablet
Version: 3.2.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
Source: tuba
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: astap
Version: 2022.12.09-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: mathcomp-analysis
Version: 0.6.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: q2cli
Version: 2022.11.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
>
Source: prewikka
Version: 5.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
>
Source: apertium-eo-en
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: image-factory
Version: 1.0.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: libreswan
Version: 4.12-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -pthread -std=gnu99
Source: dwarf2sources
Version: 0.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: apertium-es-ro
Version: 0.7.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: python-procrunner
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
