Package: python-is-python2
Version: 2.7.18-6
Severity: serious
Justifictaion: fails to install
Upgrading from "python" to "python-is-python" may fail:
| Unpacking python-is-python2 (2.7.18-6) ...
| dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/python-is-python2_2.7.18-6_all.deb
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 7:56 AM Martin Pitt wrote:
>
> Package: pcp
> Version: 5.2.1-1
> [...]
> But the "bpftrace" package only exists on a few architectures [1]. This is
> what
> makes the package uninstallable and prevents testing migration [2].
>
> Please fix
> that at least by restricting
Source: mathomatic
Version: 16.0.5-3
Tags: patch
User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftcbfs
mathomatic fails to cross build from source, because it does not pass
cross tools to make. The easiest way of doing so - using dh_auto_build -
makes mathomatic cross buildable. Please consider
Source: mp3gain
Version: 1.6.2-1
Tags: patch
User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftcbfs
mp3gain fails to cross build from source, because it does not pass cross
tools to make. The easiest way of fixing that - using dh_auto_build -
makes mp3gain cross buildable. Please consider applying
please close this duplicate of 973268. apologies for the resend.
I've pushed the patch in #973052 to a new branch named bug-973052 in the
https://salsa.debian.org/dns-team/unbound repo (on top of
branches/1.9.0-2_deb10).
Hopefully one of the other DNS folks will review it and merge it if it
looks reasonable. Not sure whether we should release a new version
package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
*URL : https://cgit.chrisoft.org/QMidiPlayer.git/
*License : GPL-3.0
*Description : Feature-rich Qt5 MIDI player
QMidiPlayer is a cross-platform midi file player based on
libfluidsynth and Qt. Featuring on-the-fly channel parameters
and synthesizer effects
Package: openjdk-11-jdk-headless
Version: 11.0.9+11-1~deb10u1
Severity: minor
This was a suprise, but perhaps it's intended behaviour.
Please close if so.
* What led up to the situation?
These packages were waiting for upgrade
openjdk-11-jre 11.0.8+10-1~deb10u1 ->
In addition, it may be necessary to recommend wireless-regdb instead.
This package seems to contain some firmware files that may be
the ones cited in CRDA README.
Finally, note that currently, wireless-regdb suggests crda.
Package: openjdk-11-jdk-headless
Version: 11.0.9+11-1~deb10u1
Severity: minor
This was a suprise but perhaps intended. Please close if so.
* What led up to the situation?
These packages were waiting for upgrade
openjdk-11-jre 11.0.8+10-1~deb10u1 -> 11.0.9+11-1~deb10u1
Hi there,
I'm writing to voice that I disagree with the premise of this bug
report. For instance, I find password autofill and automatic checking
against "Have I been Pwnd" valuable, and I wouldn't want to miss it.
So I would prefer that networking support is retained in KeepassXC, or
if it were
Hi there,
I'm just writing to say that I would also like this. And 2.6.2 was just
released upstream. Maybe that's a good enough excuse. :)
Just to be annoying, I created a zero-effort merge request:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/keepassxc/-/merge_requests/7
Sorry,
Andreas
signature.asc
Package: libtss2-dev
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: mario.limoncie...@dell.com
Dear Maintainer,
The pkgconfig file included in libtss2-dev contains an invalid path:
Name: tss2-esys
Description: TPM2 Enhanced System API library.
URL: https://github.com/tpm2-software/tpm2-tss
On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 08:39:48 +0200 harr...@gmx.ph wrote:
> Please could you enable these modules:
>
> CONFIG_SND_SUN4I_I2S=m ("Allwinner A10 I2S Support")
> CONFIG_DRM_DW_HDMI_I2S_AUDIO=m ("Synopsys Designware I2S Audio interface")
They are enabled in the 5.9.0-1-arm64 kernel, but noticed
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicholas D Steeves
Control: block 941054 by -1
* Package name: python-moreorless
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Tim Hatch
* URL : https://github.com/thatch/moreorless
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 unreproducible
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 1:46 AM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> Source: delve
> Version: 1.5.0-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullse
A preliminary patch is available here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maxima/+bug/1877185/comments/4
Testing and improvements are welcome!
--
Ilya
Thanks for the report.
Looks like libcommons-io-java has been updated to 2.8.0.[1] We'll need
to patch both the Debian build and send a PR upstream to get it on the
newer version.
- e
[1]: https://packages.debian.org/sid/libcommons-io-java
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
"Debian Bug Tracking System" writes:
> Your message dated Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:20:47 +0200
> with message-id <4ce39769-f1c3-68ad-3965-688d1f6c0...@debian.org>
> and subject line Re: Bug#962294: RFS: btrfs-progs/5.7-1~bpo10+1 --
> Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities
> has caused the
Package: pulseaudio
Version: 12.2-4+deb10u1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
It appears that when I upgraded from linux-image-4.19.0-10-amd64 to
either 11 or 12 the customizations in default.pa fail to load (I
need those to be able switch between headphone and speaker output,
using a
Package: sgt-puzzles
Version: 20191231.79a5378-3
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: kapil.paranj...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
If one compares the puzzles set up by 'sgt-palisade' with those that are
on the main website, one sees that the former gives much more
information than the latter. *All* the
Source: arm-trusted-firmware
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
I happen to have an Odroid N2 (amlogic g12a board) and would like to see
a proper Debian installed on it. Aside from the other things, it's my
understanding that certain changes are required for arm-trusted-firmware
sign already
Source: u-boot
Version: 2019.01+dfsg-7
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
I happen to have an Odroid N2 (amlogic g12a board) and would like to see
a proper Debian installed on it. Aside from the other things, it's my
understanding that specially built u-boot is required for it, and
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.9.1-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bugrep...@feuerrot.org
Dear Maintainer,
I'd like to use my devices microphone without having to build my own kernel,
which I can't as it requires the following kernel options to be enabled:
> CONFIG_SND_SOC_AMD_ACP3x=m
>
Oct 26, 2020, 14:58 by claremont...@gmail.com:
> Thank you for your report, Ahzo. I have forwarded it upstream. Please
> review what I have written and correct or add to it as you see fit.
>
Thanks for forwarding the report, as Lauchpad still doesn't work for me.
Your summary in the upstream
Or uncheck the box "Allow Thunderbird to send technical and interaction
data to Mozilla" within the Edit - Preferences - Privacy & Security menu.
Shouldn't this be the default?
I was shockingly surprised to see this enabled after TB upgraded. If
memory serves me, telemetry is always off by
Control: reassign -1 node-fetch
Control: affects -1 node-formidable
Le 27/10/2020 à 18:07, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: node-formidable
> Version: 1.2.1+20200129git8231ea6-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ft
Control: reassign -1 webpack
Control: affects -1 src:pdf.js
Le 27/10/2020 à 18:09, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: pdf.js
> Version: 2.6.347+dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
&g
Control: forcemerge 973052 962459
Hi Kebert--
On Mon 2020-06-08 12:28:46 +0200, Kebert Martin wrote:
> unbound constantly crashing with:
> [err] evmap.c:381: Assertion nread >= 0 failed in evmap_io_del_
>
> The issue is fixed in unbound 1.9.2 but this version is not available in
> debian
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.9.1-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: jrub...@gmail.com
This kernel works mostly OK, but on my system, attempting to power off
the system will hang after killing some programs, and it takes an
extensively long time to kill the programs. Forcing reboot by
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 01:05:32PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:feature-check
> Version: 0.2.2-5
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid bullseye
> User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: python3.9
This is the same as #972530, which was already fixed in 0.2.2-6 on
Monday, however
On Wednesday, 28 October 2020 6:13:41 AM AEDT Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> The bigger issue here (independent of the whole vendoring aspect) is
> how kubernetes can be supported in a stable release to begin with.
> This was raised by Shengjing Zhu in #959685 before.
If Kubernetes can be supported
Hi,
To me it looks like an issue in python-httpretty. I'll try to fix
httpretty and rebuild cloud-init, then probably close this bug.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
For the second error, I missed the "--term=" option to chnage the
default terminal, so the issue is only :
running "j4-dmenu-desktop", "dmenu" is missing. So "suckless-tools"
should be a dependency
Thanks. Looks like I was accidentally using an undocumented method from
python3-debian that got renamed. I have a working and fix and will ask
my sponsor to upload it.
Hi,
Vlastimil, did you actually try to put some ini file in the relevant
folder, ie: /etc/uwsgi-emperor/vassals/ ? How did you test to tell that
it didn't work?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Package: shared-mime-info
Version: 1.10-1
Installation failed for package shared-mime-info with below message:
Setting up shared-mime-info (1.10-1) ...
update-mime-database: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib/mipsel-linux-gnu/libicui18n.so.63: undefined symbol:
u_caseInsensitivePrefixMatch_63
dpkg:
Hi Scott,
Scott Kitterman writes:
> On May 2, 2020 4:17:20 AM UTC, Drew Parsons wrote:
>>> pybuild will want to support it
>>
>>Some discussion has started on the mailing list,
>>
>>https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/04/msg00061.html
>
> As mentioned in the thread, there's a pybuild
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi,
Am 27.10.20 um 16:30 schrieb Patrick Häcker:
> Package: ardentryst
> Version: 1.71-7
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I cannot start ardentryst any more:
>
> pat@mmm ~> cd /usr/share/games/ardentryst
>/usr/bin/python3
Package: libhdf5-openmpi-dev
Version: 1.10.6+repack-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
when installing libhdf5-openmpi-dev in a chroot that doesn't have /proc
mounted, one will get the following error:
Setting up libhdf5-openmpi-dev (1.10.6+repack-2) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libhdf5-openmpi-dev.postinst:
Scott (in CC) wrote a flit plugin for pybuild. Can this be closed?
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org
⠈⠳⣄
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rce: geneweb
> Version: 6.08+git20181019+dfsg-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
>
Control: tags 957814 + patch
Control: tags 957814 + pending
--
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for sma (versioned as 1.4-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should cancel it.
--
Regards
Sudip
diff -Nru sma-1.4/debian/changelog sma-1.4/debian/changelog
---
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 04:54:13PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Testing to start the OpenStack image (well, the "genericcloud" image), I
> couldn't login into it, because there isn't any metadata service configured
> in it.
This is incorrect. The package uses
Package: apt
Version: 2.1.11
Severity: normal
Hi,
doing apt --mark-auto build-dep hello I would expect all newly installed
packages to be marked as automatically installed. Instead I see even
some already installed packages marked manual:
(unstable-amd64-sbuild)root@fenchel:~# apt-mark
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.20.5
Severity: important
Today while working on the autopkgtests of an ITP of mine I discovered
that apt fails to install packages from the local repo, seemingly
because of missing sha512 hashes. Whether intentional or not, the
effect seems to be that apt is
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:15:47PM +0100, Ansgar wrote:
> Package: apt
> Severity: wishlist
>
> aptitude allows to install/upgrade packages and mark them as
> automatically installed:
>
> aptitude install foo+M
>
> I find this feature useful when asking to upgrade to a specific version
> of a
Package: kde-spectacle
Version: 20.08.2-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Normal spectacle usage
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
In the included screenshot, VokoScreen and OBS-studio appears
Package: src:linux
Followup-For: Bug #941197
X-Debbugs-Cc: m...@gallifrey-blr.fr
Dear Maintainer,
I have the same issue on my laptop : Dell Latitude 7480 with i7 6600U.
Here the dmesg error :
[4.153948] i915 :00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO underrun
-- Package-specific info:
**
Source: pacemaker
Version: 2.0.4-2
Severity: important
Tags: security upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Control: found -1 2.0.1-5
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for pacemaker.
CVE-2020-25654[0]:
| ACL restrictions bypass
If you fix the vulnerability
Package: apt
Severity: wishlist
aptitude allows to install/upgrade packages and mark them as
automatically installed:
aptitude install foo+M
I find this feature useful when asking to upgrade to a specific version
of a package, but not wanting to have it marked as manually installed.
A Cultist
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 12:24:51AM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Package: f2fs-tools
> Version: 1.11.0-1.1
> Followup-For: Bug #970176
>
> On salsa.d.o it looks like version 1.13 was ready to go, but it appears
> that it just never got uploaded to the archives/sid.
> It would be really welcome
Hi,
This appears to be caused by the recent upgrade of Apache commons-io to
version 2.8.0 (we had 2.6), see also #973135. In version 2.7 they
removed a throws IOException in the method isSymlink()
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-610
Could it be related to this change? It is probably
Control: tags -1 - patch
On 2020-10-26 13:19:36 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: libtheora0
> Version: 1.1.1+dfsg.1-11
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch fixed-upstream
> Forwarded: https://gitlab.xiph.org/xiph/theora/-/issues/2312
>
> The latest version of Proton (Valve's branch of Wine,
On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 20:58 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 27.10.20 um 19:48 schrieb Patrice Duroux:
> > Package: network-manager
> > Version: 1.27.91-1
> > Severity: minor
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> > First I read this:
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972994
Package: python3-ofxparse
Version: 0.15+git20161013-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Using python3-ofxparse (be it with
buster,bullseye or sid) with Python 3.8 or 3.9
yields the following warning:
ofxparse/ofxparse.py:40: DeprecationWarning: Using or importing the ABCs from
'collections'
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 18:06:31 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: libcxx-serial
> Version: 1.2.1-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packag
Package: librcsb-core-wrapper
Version: 1.005-8
Severity: normal
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu hirsute ubuntu-patch
Dear maintainers,
After applying the patch from bug #973249, librcsb-core-wrapper still fails
to build from source when trying to build the python3
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > Caused by: java.io.IOException: Unable to delete file:
> > > targets/unit-test-wd/ch.systemsx.cisd.base.unix.UnixTests/someDanglingLink
> > > at org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils.forceDelete(FileUtils.java:1425)
> > > at
Source: libpam-tacplus
Version: 1.3.8-2
Severity: important
Tags: security upstream
Forwarded: https://github.com/kravietz/pam_tacplus/pull/163
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for libpam-tacplus.
CVE-2020-27743[0]:
| libtac in
Exit ifdata with an error code if '-ph' (print hardware address) is
given but no hardware address is available for the given network device.
Previously, ifdata printed the invalid hardware address
00:00:00:00:00:00 in such cases and exited as if this was the real
hardware address.
Signed-off-by:
Control: unblock 973047 by -1
--
Turns out that this one is not needed for s2-geometry-library java
library and so unblocking #973047.
Its almost packaged in local system but I am not uploading since I
dont need it now. Keeping the ITP open, if anyone needs this package
then I can upload.
--
Package: librcsb-core-wrapper
Version: 1.005-8
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch
Dear maintainers,
We've found that librcsb-core-wrapper fails to build from source in Ubuntu,
due to references to a generated header file that is
Control: tags 957138 + patch
Control: tags 957138 + pending
--
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for directvnc (versioned as 0.7.7-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should cancel it.
--
Regards
Sudip
diff -Nru directvnc-0.7.7/debian/changelog
Package: puppet
Version: 5.5.22-1
This is a similar but different bug as
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955532 .
I get this warning on a puppet run:
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/puppet/file_system/uniquefile.rb:126: warning:
$SAFE will become a normal global variable in Ruby
Hi Stuart,
thank you very much for your work on adding .buildinfo support for
python-debian!
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 05:32:19PM +1100, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> The .buildinfo files have two places where interpreting the values seems
> worthwhile:
>
> Environment: split the lines and
ase-java
> Version: 18.09~pre1+git20180827.fe4953e+dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd
Source: python-cryptography
Version: 3.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: security upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Control: found -1 2.6.1-3+deb10u2
Control: found -1 2.6.1-3
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for python-cryptography.
CVE-2020-25659[0]:
|
Control: reassign -1 distro-info-data
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 02:56:39PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Package: src:distro-info
> Severity: wishlist
>
> This is for bullseye, but filing it now, so we can do it at the
> start of the quarter
>
> python-apt currently ships various data files
Hi
Am 27.10.20 um 19:48 schrieb Patrice Duroux:
Package: network-manager
Version: 1.27.91-1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
First I read this:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972994
Then I checked this:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: po...@debian.org
* Package name : python-mediafile
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : Adrian Sampson
* URL : https://github.com/beetbox/mediafile
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : read and write audio files' tags in Python
Source: openrc
Version: 0.42-1
Severity: important
Tags: security upstream
Forwarded: https://github.com/OpenRC/openrc/issues/201
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Control: found -1 0.40.3-1
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for openrc.
CVE-2018-21269[0]:
|
Source: opentmpfiles
Version: 0.2+2019.05.21.git.44a55796ba-2
Severity: important
Tags: security upstream
Forwarded: https://github.com/OpenRC/opentmpfiles/issues/3
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for opentmpfiles.
Control: tags -1 upstream pending
This is fixed upstream, the commit in question will be included as a patch.
Kind Regards,
Bas
Package: libprelude
Version: 5.1.1-6
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch
Hi Pierre,
In Ubuntu, libprelude has started failing to build from source on s390x due
to some toolchain changes that now hide some additional template
Greetings,
I've been following this ITA for sometime, mostly because earlier this
year I was using starfighter as a case study for debian packaging.
I noticed that it has not seen activity in a while, and the Freeze is
getting closer. So I'd like to check if this package is still
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 08:22:11AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello security team,
>
> The TC are being asked about src:kubernetes, and it would be good to
> hear from you about whether and how security support is a relevant
> consideration in determining whether the level of vendoring in that
Am 27.10.20 um 20:10 schrieb Gregor Riepl:
>> https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/renpy/commit/fc29ebfe106238b590a7896450a5d1ad1f94f84e
>>
>>
>> Switch to python3.
>>
>> Closes: #938351
>>
> https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/renpy/commit/fc29ebfe106238b590a7896450a5d1ad1f94f84e
>
>
> Switch to python3.
>
> Closes: #938351
>
I'm
tags -1 fixed
block 973034 by 972717
thanks
This has been fixed in the VCS already [1], but a new revision can't be
uploaded since this package FTBFS with python3.9
[1]:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/supysonic/-/commit/e187fd03c2c22939778f870f07fbfada50b9ada7
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel
* Package name: ayatana-indicator-bluetooth
Version : 0.8.0
Upstream Author : Marius Gripsgard
Robert Tari
Mike Gabriel
* URL :
Package: opentmpfiles
Severity: grave
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
This was assigned CVE-2017-18925:
https://github.com/OpenRC/opentmpfiles/issues/4
Cheers,
Moritz
Source: python-smoke-zephyr
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpack
Source: python-fedora
Version: 0.10.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: neo
Version: 0.7.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: ktorrent
Version: 5.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld: CMakeFi
Package: chromium
Version: 83.0.4103.116-3.1
Severity: normal
See upstream bug:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1142228 .
This does not occur with Google Chrome, but it does occur with Debian's
Chromium.
Also tested the version in experimental which has the same
Source: python-murano-pkg-check
Version: 0.3.0-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: websploit
Version: 4.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpack
Source: kio-extras
Version: 4:19.12.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld:
> CMak
Source: weechat-el
Version: 0.5.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering direct
Source: python-django-celery-beat
Version: 1.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: cura
Version: 4.7.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory '/<
Source: dh-cmake
Version: 0.6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpack
Package: network-manager
Version: 1.27.91-1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
First I read this:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972994
Then I checked this:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/crda.git/tree/README
Finally I do this:
> LANG=C apt rdepends
Source: minexpert2
Version: 7.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/debian/build/sr
Source: typedload
Version: 2.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering direct
Source: node-libnpx
Version: 10.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: soundkonverter
Version: 3.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/obj-x86_64-
1 - 100 of 347 matches
Mail list logo
