Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sandro Tosi
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, mo...@debian.org
* Package name: sphinx-book-theme
Version : 0.1.6
Upstream Author : Chris Holdgraf
* URL : https://sphinx-book-theme.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
* License
Hi Hannah,
Hannah Rittich writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have created a patch set which allows to specify a prefix for the
> files and directories that are installed into system directories. These
> patches have also been accepted by the upstream author. Thus, the
> packages cpputilities and qtutilities
On 10/23/21 08:27, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 10/22/21 6:17 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 10/22/21 5:51 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 10/22/21 1:49 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 10/22/21 11:19 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 10/21/21 11:17 PM, Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Drew,
Thanks for the catch!
yes, library splitting is somehow strange in this package. We should
probably split it in much more sublibs to escape such situations in the
future.
Regards
Anton
Drew Parsons schrieb am So., 24. Okt. 2021, 02:18:
> Source: sundials
> Version: 5.7.0+dfsg-1
>
Hi 肖盛文
On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 8:51 PM xiao sheng wen wrote:
>
> Is this the root case of this bug?
Possibly. I thought I had looked into the locales question with Iñaki
Malerba from the Salsa CI Team about a year ago. If you found it, I am
going to have a party!
The messages have never been
Hi Alexandre and Hannah,
So sorry for the unreasonably long delay, reply follows inline:
Alexandre Viau writes:
> Hello Nicholas, Hannah,
>
>> Oh, and Alexandre was my first Debian contact.
>
> Aww. This is giving me Debconf nostalgia <3.
>
That's wonderful to hear <3 I look forward to
Hi,
The Docker images provided by Salsa CI:
registry.salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/lintian:unstable
It has not install the locales package.
The locales.postinst of locales package can set the LC_ALL, LANG and
generate some files,etc.
Is this the root case of this bug?
--
Hi Hannah,
I'm sorry for the unreasonably long delay. (this was a draft from
late Sept) Reply follows inline:
Hannah Rittich writes:
>
> I think a prefix would be nicer, and I think it should not be too hard
> to add configuration name prefix switch. I would like to check if this
> is a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sandro Tosi
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, mo...@debian.org
* Package name: sphinx-panels
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : Executable Books
* URL : https://sphinx-panels.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
* License
Package: bookworm
Version: 1.1.2+git20210715-2
Severity: normal
Usertags: crash
File: /usr/bin/com.github.babluboy.bookworm
When I turn on glibc heap consistency checking, bookworm crashes at
startup. From the gdb trace it looks like it is trying to g_strdup a
pointer that has not been
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dedalus":
* Package name : dedalus
Version : 2.2006-1
Upstream Author : Keaton J. Burns
* URL : https://dedalus-project.org/
* License : GPL-3
* Vcs :
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Aloha,
From looking up ci.debian.net [1], this q2cli issue seems
related to a recent upgrade of python-click 8.0.2.
[1]: https://ci.debian.net/packages/q/q2cli/testing/amd64/
The multiple failures are probably all related to the following
issue, which can be simply
Control: found -1 11.2.152~11.2.2-3
Control: found -1 11.3.109~11.3.1-4
Control: retitle -1 nvidia-cuda-gdb: cuda-gdb 'Segmentation fault' at startup
if libpython2.7 is installed
On 22/10/2021 19.11, Tim Trant wrote:
"gdb /usr/bin/cuda-gdb" and "strings /usr/bin/cuda-gdb" suggest that there's
Hi Piotr (2021.10.22_11:06:02_-0700)
> I'm doing some testing to see what effect this will have. There are
> about 500 affected packages, as far as I can tell.
So, about 50 of them fail to build with this change (and a couple go
from FTBFS to building successfully):
--- setuppy-test-failed
Control: tags -1 patch fixed-upstream
On 2021-10-22 18:35:55 +0700, Damir Islamov wrote:
> Tags 996104 patch fixed-upstream
Really tagging...
> https://github.com/dell/dkms/commit/
> 64a882a32fdf126ef20e6b6403b5cb158dad21f4[1]
Without the line break:
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Greetings,
Lucas Nussbaum, on 2021-10-23:
> > Failure: ImportError (cannot import name 'MapperExtension' from
> > 'sqlalchemy.orm.interfaces'
> > (/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/interfaces.py)) ... ERROR
This one has the same symptom as the autopkgtest
Control: tags 783550 pending
Hi everyone,
About this bug:
> 1 No /var/www/mrtg directory was created
Fixed. I will send a new revision to Debian soon.
> 2 No mrtg.cfg file was created ANYWHERE
Fixed in a previous release.
> 3 No cronjob was added, i.e. no /etc/cron.d/mrtg file
Fixed in a
I have now 'patched' the upstream setting of GSL_AGE, this results (as kindly
analysed by Sebastian) in new sonames '26' so I prepared a new version which
just went out to unstable.
Unless I am mistaken, I need to get the release team on board for a proper
transition. Correct?
Dirk
--
Hi Axel,
On Sunday, 24 October 2021 02:08:46 CEST Axel Beckert wrote:
> Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > enabled the security repo lines in /etc/apt/sources.list. But when doing
> > 'aptitude update', it reported that it couldn't find the repo.
> > Turns out that it uses 'jessie-security', what the
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tag -1 + confirmed pending
Hi Diederik,
Diederik de Haas wrote:
> I have recently created a Jessie VM and noticed that there was (quite) a
> difference between the kernel I expected and the one that I had.
> I just learned that those are uploaded to
This might be related to the bug I submitted: 996026
I found that its pulling in a few nvidia-460 packages:
Inst nvidia-legacy-check (460.91.03-1 Debian:11.0/stable [amd64])
Inst nvidia-alternative (460.91.03-1 Debian:11.0/stable [amd64])
Inst nvidia-egl-common (460.91.03-1 Debian:11.0/stable
Package: xen-tools
Version: 4.9-1
Severity: normal
I have recently created a Jessie VM and noticed that there was (quite) a
difference between the kernel I expected and the one that I had.
I just learned that those are uploaded to security.debian.org, so I
enabled the security repo lines in
Package: fprintd
Version: 1.90.9-1build1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: john.loughran.col...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
Sorry if I do something wrong here, I've never submitted a bug to debian
before. I am acutally running kubuntu but I'm pretty sure the bug is
deeper down the stack. It may even
Source: flufl.bounce
Version: 3.0.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
flufl.bounce is an important part of the operation of
mailman3. Mailmain3 upstream informs me that the bounces currently
bugging me are detected properly with version 4.0 of
Package: projectm-pulseaudio
Version: 3.1.12-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Today I heard about ProjectM for the first time, so I looked at the list of
packages and decided projectm-pulseaudio would be the most useful variant for
me. I installed it:
$ sudo apt install
Source: sundials
Version: 5.7.0+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
Unless I misunderstood the package naming system for sundials, looks
like there was an ABI bump in sublibraries when sundials upgraded from
v4 to v5.
It can be seen in 5.7.0+dfsg-1, so it's not a side-effect of the the new
5.8.0 build
On Sat, 23 Oct 2021 at 21:53:34 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I suspect that applying the change from
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gstreamermm/-/merge_requests/4 in
> gstreamermm-1.0 would allow lordsawar to be built successfully against it
> (test-builds in progress).
Yes, confirmed via a
Package: general
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: jacobkochems+bugtrack...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
When using Firefox (FF) with many open tabs it sometimes freezes and takes the
whole system with it. At this point all mouse and keyboard input is ignored. In
The line causing the error message can safely be removed as it is
redundant. The correction appears in the most recent stable release, 3.2.0
On Sat, 23 Oct 2021, 16:24 Lucas Nussbaum, wrote:
> Source: lives
> Version: 3.0.2-1.1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid
Hi,
Alain Knaff wrote on 23/10/2021 at 14:21:32+0200:
> Package: mailman3-web
> Version: 0+20200530-2
>
> Hi,
>
> After I recently upgraded my server to Debian 11, I was rather appalled
> that mailman was dropped without a clear migration path.
>
> I figured out that this is now replaced by
Control: Forwarded -1
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/cabvffennj8jkp7etuutqi+vkjdbfu37w1uxe4q3cb7-ixxh...@mail.gmail.com/
On Saturday, 23 October 2021 23:29:21 CEST Daniel Black wrote:
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-block=163489378723217=2
Looked up your upstream message on lore.k.o and set
23.10.2021 19:33, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: qemu
Version: 1:6.1+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64
Oh, hold on! I'm not sure I have the same definition of "ipv6
only" as the buildd. Mine involves not having ipv4 loopback at
all, which does not raise the issue documented in the bug
report, but tornado errors on binding to 127.0.0.1 instead.
If my ipv6 only host gets back an ipv4 loopback,
Package: lintian
Version: 2.110.0
Severity: normal
Hi, I see lintian 2.110 is now emitting a
package-contains-python-dot-directory tag for .egg-info directories in
binary packages.
We do not want to encourage package maintainers to remove .egg-info
directories from their Python binary packages.
# imake
reassign 997628 xutils-dev
found 997628 1:7.7+5
retitle 997628 imake: uses “ar clq” by default, which recent binutils broke in
an incompatible way
# causes an FTBFS, cannot be workarounded in mgp
affects 997628 src:mgp
# root bug is in binutils
block 997628 by 981072
# at least, if not
Le 23/10/2021 à 22:02, Dimitri John Ledkov a écrit :
>
>
> On Sat, 23 Oct 2021, 19:49 Sylvestre Ledru, wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> Le 20/10/2021 à 18:05, Dimitri John Ledkov a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've tried to reproduce this more
> Thanks, I appreciate it!
>> and I have a few
> "Johannes" == Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues writes:
Johannes> Control: user debian-d...@lists.debian.org Control:
Johannes> usertag -1 + dpkg-root-support
Johannes> Hi Sam,
Johannes> Quoting Helmut Grohne (2021-09-24 18:14:28)
>> So if you continue refusing our
https://marc.info/?l=linux-block=163489378723217=2
Source: earlyoom
Version: 1.6.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: binutils-mingw-w64
Version: 8.11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: calibre
Version: 5.29.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: botan
Version: 2.18.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: cgreen
Version: 1.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Enter
Source: xfsprogs
Version: 5.13.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: diodon
Version: 1.11.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bu
Source: caribou
Version: 0.4.21-7.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: billiard
Version: 3.6.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: sparql-wrapper-python
Version: 1.8.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> d
Source: python-ara
Version: 1.4.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: xtel
Version: 3.3.0-24
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Enter
Source: feedparser
Version: 5.2.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: pyvirtualdisplay
Version: 0.2.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: pystache
Version: 0.5.4-6.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: ssvnc
Version: 1.0.29-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: python-slimmer
Version: 0.1.30-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: rnc2rng
Version: 2.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: ctwm
Version: 3.7-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: jquery-tablesorter
Version: 1:2.31.3+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: knews
Version: 1.0b.1-33
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
Source: pybluez
Version: 0.23-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/ru
Source: nas
Version: 1.9.4-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Enter
Source: python-keepalive
Version: 0.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: python-oauth
Version: 1.0.1-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: koules
Version: 1.4-27
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
Source: flask-openid
Version: 1.2.5+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: python-rdflib-jsonld
Version: 0.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: python-tempita
Version: 0.5.2-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: behave
Version: 1.2.6-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/ru
Source: pycallgraph
Version: 1.1.3-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: mgp
Version: 1.13a+upstream20090219-12
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: pygithub
Version: 1.43.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: pyraf
Version: 2.1.15-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/ru
Source: pixmap
Version: 2.6pl4-20
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: django-restricted-resource
Version: 2016.8-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-defer
Version: 1.0.6-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: node-jquery
Version: 3.5.1+dfsg+~3.5.5-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: kinput2
Version: 3.1-13
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: funcparserlib
Version: 0.3.6+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: fvwm1
Version: 1.24r-57
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: python-dexml
Version: 0.5.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: python-mailer
Version: 0.8.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: python-jsmin
Version: 2.2.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: twofish
Version: 0.3-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bu
Source: python-anyjson
Version: 0.3.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: troffcvt
Version: 1.04-25
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
Source: python-parse-type
Version: 0.3.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: blessings
Version: 1.6-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: vatnumber
Version: 1:1.2-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpack
Source: wnn6-sdk
Version: 1.0.0-18
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Enter
Source: suds
Version: 0.8.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: deap
Version: 1.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: easyprocess
Version: 0.2.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: simpleeval
Version: 0.9.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: python-fudge
Version: 1.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: pprofile
Version: 2.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpack
Source: x2gobroker
Version: 0.0.4.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: glue
Version: 0.13-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: iptables-converter
Version: 0.9.8-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: toro
Version: 1.0.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/ru
Source: fail2ban
Version: 0.11.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
1 - 100 of 690 matches
Mail list logo
