On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 09:27:13PM +0100, Olly Betts wrote:
> I think it'd be good to check with upstream if the "experimental" marker
> is out-dated, or still accurate, and if it's still accurate what the
> downsides of this are. I've opened a ticket:
>
>
Le mercredi, 7 juin 2023, 10.10:50 h CEST Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> Le mer. 7 juin 2023 à 08:00, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a
>
> écrit :
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
> >
> > Package name: typesense
Hi,
If you open RFA or ITA for this package and not wnpp, your request or
intention to adopt will not appear in searches. Still interested? I'm
thinking of doing some QA work for the package that should come out
after bookworm is released.
[1]
Hi!
Note that upstream released 10.11.4 today. Import preparation in
progress at
https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/mariadb-server/-/merge_requests/50.
I plan to upload this to experimental tomorrow and eventually into
bookworm-pu if the release team approves.
- Otto
Control: tags -1 + fixed-in-experimental
On Thu, 02 Feb 2023 21:29:12 +0100 Thomas Braun
wrote:
> Package: tango
> Severity: normal
>
> We would really like to have 9.4.1 [0] in upcoming debian bookworm
> instead of the old 9.3.x.
>
> I've already tested if our tests pass on debian testing on
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 11:46, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 11:29, Simon McVittie wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 at 20:40:52 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > Luca Boccassi writes:
> > > > +Packages might need additional files or directories to implement their
> > > >
No, please go ahead and do both: my availability is spotty for the next 18
hours. :)
(on mobile)
Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 9:01 PM Chris Lamb wrote:
>> I see your 2.5.5-3+deb10u6 update on the debian/buster branch which
>> fixes the broken +deb10u5 upload,
Package: coreutils
Version: 8.32-4+b1
Version: 9.1-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
isgraph(3):
isgraph()
checks for any printable character except space.
od(1):
-S BYTES, --strings[=BYTES]
output strings of at least BYTES graphic chars; 3 is implied
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 20:17, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 14:15, Leonardo Held wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello again Lisandro,
> >
> > On 06.06.23 11:40 AM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > > And at that point is where I'll personally say
Hi!
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 14:15, Leonardo Held wrote:
>
>
> Hello again Lisandro,
>
> On 06.06.23 11:40 AM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > And at that point is where I'll personally say "no". I do not have
> > enough free time to handle this, and that is in fact the reason I am
>
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 11:34:17PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 00:01:42 +0200 Bill Allombert
> > This is beside the point. Your problematic statement was
> > "The whole project is moving toward git and Salsa ".
> > This is not conducive of productive interaction.
>
> It was
I've made a suggestion upstream of how we could do better here by making
this either a fatal error or at least a warning. If it was a fatal error
with a good error message, you would have figured it out immediately.
Let's see what people think of that.
--
Richard
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 08:19:08AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I would like to add more documentation like this around systemd-related
> things to Policy because systemd is complicated and has a lot of options,
> so people who aren't deeply familiar with it will easily miss best
> practices in
Hi Bernhard, Kees,
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 6:58 PM Schmidt, Bernhard
wrote:
> > I've prepared a fix for the regression and uploaded the binaries at:
> > https://people.debian.org/~utkarsh/lts/ruby2.5/
> >
> > Can you please give these a try and see if that fixes the regression
> > you're seeing?
Hi Chris,
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 9:01 PM Chris Lamb wrote:
> I see your 2.5.5-3+deb10u6 update on the debian/buster branch which
> fixes the broken +deb10u5 upload, but I don't see it in the archive
> yet.
>
> Although you mentioned you were going to wait a bit more, I'm just
> 100%-checking you
On 2023-06-07 12:07, Danilo Egea Gondolfo wrote:
* What led up to the situation?
The build is failing on armhf because cmake is not detecting the
architecture correctly as we cross compile on arm64.
Also, after fixing the cmake part, the build will fail in src/triggers.h
due to the
Source: mkdocstrings-python-handlers
Version: 0.8.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: randomness toolchain
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we noticed that
Source: ifupdown
Version:
Severity: n0.8.36 ormal
Dear Debian team,
I am using ifupdown package on Debian 11.7 with one wifi
interface(if-sta0) in STA mode with sysvinit (no systemd). As a
result, of course, i am also using supplicant daemon supplied by
wpasupplicant
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye moreinfo
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: appstream-g...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:appstream-glib
[ Reason ]
Recent server-side changes on flathub.org mean that it started
Control: reassign -1 source:wxwidgets3.2
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 09:49:19AM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> I think it would be okay to enable xtest support even though it doesn't work
> under Wayland.
I think it'd be good to check with upstream if the "experimental" marker
is out-dated, or still
Package: awstats
Version: 7.8-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then
prompted the user for an action. As there is
Control: tags 1037206 + patch
Control: tags 1037206 + pending
Here is a proposed fix. I'll open a bullseye-pu bug next.
Corresponding git branch:
https://salsa.debian.org/smcv/appstream-glib/-/tree/debian/bullseye-proposed?ref_type=heads
Diff viewable at:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 08:01:23PM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Marc Haber wrote:
> > I am really sorry for this. #1037171 is an embarrassing one, sadly too
> > late for the release, but I'll try to do a fix via spu.
>
> I gather from the version data that when the bug submitter says buster
>
Control: block -1 by 1037212
Hello,
Le 07/06/2023 à 20:34, Dima Kogan a écrit :
Hi. I'll gladly accept help on this. If you can do this yourself, that
would be great!
Thanks
Thanks for your quick answer; fine then, I will do so :)
I could build it in a Bullseye chroot by having also
Source: picojson
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
I would be interested in having picojson backported to Bullseye, for myself but
also for people working with me.
If you want, I would be pleased to do it for you (I am a DD).
Best,
--
Pierre
Hi Florian,
On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 08:49:25PM +0200, Florian Lehner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the fix was merged upstream with
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/mm/maccess.c?id=d319f344561de23e810515d109c7278919bff7b0
And so landed in 6.4-rc1.
Great
Package: coreutils
Version: 8.32-4+b1
Version: 9.1-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Quoth od(1):
SYNOPSIS
od [OPTION]... [FILE]...
od [-abcdfilosx]... [FILE] [[+]OFFSET[.][b]]
od --traditional [OPTION]... [FILE] [[+]OFFSET[.][b] [+][LABEL][.][b]]
DESCRIPTION
If
Hi,
On 07-06-2023 13:40, Martin Bagge / brother wrote:
Noticed that was added in the upgrading section of the
release notes (looks to be introduced via #1035089) and I can parse that
(or can I?) but make validate does not pass clean with it.
Thanks, I thought I fixed that...
Yes I did, in
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 11:00:14PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> +org-mode (9.4.0+dfsg-1+deb11u1) bullseye-security; urgency=medium
> +
> + * Fix Org Mode command injection vulnerability CVE-2023-28617 by
> backporting
> +0004-Org-Mode-vulnerability-CVE-2023-28617-is-fixed.patch
Marc Haber wrote:
> I am really sorry for this. #1037171 is an embarrassing one, sadly too
> late for the release, but I'll try to do a fix via spu.
I gather from the version data that when the bug submitter says buster
that's a typo for bookworm?
> Suggested wording for something along chapter
Source: qt6-base
Version: 6.4.2+dfsg-10
Severity: important
Tags: security upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 src:qtbase-opensource-src 5.15.8+dfsg-11
Control: retitle -2 qtbase-opensource-src: CVE-2023-34410
Hi,
The
Source: renderdoc
Version: 1.24+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Tags: security upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerabilities were published for renderdoc.
CVE-2023-33863[0]:
| integer overflow to heap-based buffer overflow
CVE-2023-33864[1]:
|
Source: matrix-synapse
Version: 1.78.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: security upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerabilities were published for matrix-synapse.
CVE-2023-32682[0]:
| Synapse is a Matrix protocol homeserver written in Python with
Hi. I'll gladly accept help on this. If you can do this yourself, that
would be great!
Thanks
Package: libappstream-glib8
Version: 0.7.18-1
Severity: important
Tags: fixed-upstream bullseye
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/5434
Control: affects -1 + flatpak
Control: fixed -1 0.8.1-1
To reproduce:
$ podman run --rm -it debian:bullseye-slim
# apt update
# apt
Source: multipath-tools
Version: 0.9.4-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we noticed that
multipath-tools could
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 05:36:02PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 16:06 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 04:02:35PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 02:56:21PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2023-03-10 at
Package: debhelper
Version: 13.11.4
Severity: minor
Hi,
traditionally, I have placed my #DEBHELPER# marker last in my maintainer
scripts. I think that many package maintainers do it that way.
This doesnt work if systemd-sysusers and dh_installsysusers is used
since the account will be created
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
I am really sorry for this. #1037171 is an embarrassing one, sadly too
late for the release, but I'll try to do a fix via spu.
Greetings
Marc
Suggested wording for something along chapter 5.4:
Before upgrading your aide packages, create
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: found -1 0.18.1-1
thanks
This confirmation also applies to the severity of the issue :-( that
slipped itself in in March 2023 with 0.18.1-1. dh_installsysusers is not
called by the normal dh sequence in dh compat level 13 which leads to
the user not being
Package: libunity9
Version: 7.1.4+19.04.20190319-6+b1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
While cross-grading an i386 system to amd64, I tried to co-install both
i386 and amd64 versions of libunity9. This should be possible as they are
both marked "Multi-Arch: same". However, dpkg complains:
Reported to the GCC maintainers:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110156
Hello again Lisandro,
On 06.06.23 11:40 AM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
And at that point is where I'll personally say "no". I do not have
enough free time to handle this, and that is in fact the reason I am
maintaining Qt 6 mostly as team member (I am not listed in Uploaders
Package: typecatcher
Version: 0.3-1.2
Followup-For: Bug #815539
The package in Bookworm has exactly the same problem. Disappointing that this
bug remains seven years after being reported.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500,
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 18:47:02 +0530 Utkarsh Gupta
wrote:> I've prepared a fix for the
regression and uploaded the binaries at:
https://people.debian.org/~utkarsh/lts/ruby2.5/
Can you please give these a try and see if that fixes the regression
you're seeing?
These packages also fix the Puppet
Control: retitle -1 bookworm-pu: package gnome-shell/43.6-1~deb12u1
On Sun, 28 May 2023 at 00:29:58 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> The gnome-shell 43.5 release from GNOME upstream seems like something
> we should have in a bookworm update.
So does 43.6.
> This requires mutter 43.5, for which
On Fri, 2023-06-02 at 18:54 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Uploading libreswan 4.19-1+deb12u1 should address #1035542 (aka
> CVE-2023-30570), which addresses a potential DoS against libreswan
> instances that use a certain IKEv1 configuration.
>
> Discussion with Salvatore Bonaccorso over in
Control: retitle -1 bookworm-pu: package mutter/43.6-1~deb12u1
On Sun, 28 May 2023 at 00:15:26 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> The mutter 43.5 release from GNOME upstream seems like something we should
> have in a bookworm update.
So does the 43.6 release.
[ Reason ]
New upstream stable release
Control: reassign -1 emacsen-common,dictionaries-common
El mar, 25 abr 2023 a las 9:29, Agustin Martin () escribió:
>
> El dom, 23 abr 2023 a las 7:45, Josh Triplett
> () escribió:
> >
> > Package: dictionaries-common
> > Version: 1.29.5
> > Severity: wishlist
> > X-Debbugs-Cc:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: cru...@debian.org
Subject: ITP: cwltest -- Common Workflow Language testing framework
Package: wnpp
Owner: Michael R. Crusoe
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cwltest
Version : 2.3.20230607140609
Upstream Author : CWL, a project of
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Cyril Brulebois (2023-05-27):
> For the record, those archives end up being published in locations like
> the following, and I definitely expected those to match the firmware
> packages getting shipped into the images, not be some kind of snapshot of
> what's in
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 03:32:00PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> Hi
>
> Le Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 12:59:18PM +0100, Athanasius a écrit :
> > I've just noticed this myself. Our smtp.log is from 2020-08-08
> > onwards, so almost 2 years worth of logging. It's 28 MiB in size, so
> > not
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 08:19:08AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > In general, policy proscription are only useful when the description of
> > a better mechanism is provided. But there is no place for that in this
> > section.
>
> I'm not sure I understand this statement, since describing a
Utkarsh,
> I had missed your comment in the bug but super, many thanks for
> testing this out! I'll wait a bit more before I roll this out.
I see your 2.5.5-3+deb10u6 update on the debian/buster branch which
fixes the broken +deb10u5 upload, but I don't see it in the archive
yet.
Although you
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 3:58 PM Martin-Éric Racine
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 3:09 PM Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> >
> > Package: dhcpcd
> > Version: 9.4.1-22
> > Severity: serious
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: piuparts
> >
> > wheezy had a dhcpcd binary package built
Bill Allombert writes:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 07:56:14PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I prefer that too, but in this case, it feels like must is appropriate
>> for at least systemd configuration files. And also, just intuitively,
>> I feel like must is correct when people are using
Source: valijson
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
I would be interested in having a backport of valijson in Bullseye, not only
for me but also for other users I know.
I would happily do it myself if you wish (I am a DD).
Best wishes,
--
Pierre
Hi Andreas,
This is an unexpected bug report.
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 09:39, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: unixodbc-common,odbcinst
> Version: 2.3.11-2
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
> Control: affects -1 + libsqliteodbc
>
> Hi,
>
> during a test
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/GNUAspell/aspell/issues/636
Control: tags -1 + pending forwarded-upstream
El sáb, 3 jun 2023 a las 4:09, Bjarni Ingi Gislason
() escribió:
>
> Package: aspell
> Version: 0.60.8-4+b1
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> here are some
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/GNUAspell/aspell/issues/636
Control: tags -1 + pending forwarded-upstream
El sáb, 3 jun 2023 a las 3:45, Bjarni Ingi Gislason
() escribió:
>
> Package: aspell
> Version: 0.60.8-4+b1
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> here are some
Package: lintian
Followup-For: Bug #1029555
X-Debbugs-Cc: rol...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
Please find attached a potential fix for this lintian check bug.
Thanks,
James
>From 9fe45fdcbbc2fef8771cb049822307c5bbbafd15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: James Addison
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 15:11:20
Package: evince
Version: 43.1-2+b1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
clicking a link to open things in my browser works in basically all
applications, except evince. It took me a long whole to realize that this is
due to apparmor:
Jun 07 15:53:03 r-ethtop audit[1165140]: AVC apparmor="DENIED"
Package: locales
Version: 2.36-9
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
Posting as a bug per comment from Andrej; originally posted 2022-05-06 as
https://salsa.debian.org/glibc-team/glibc/-/merge_requests/7
Patch based on current Salsa HEAD attached, incl. analysis.
Best,
наб
--
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
I researched the problem and found that the feature I wanted was implemented
using XTest, which is detected at wxWidgets' build time [1]. Looking at the
Debian
package dependencies, I found it did *not* depend on the libxtst6 package.
I think it
Am Mittwoch, dem 07.06.2023 um 18:47 +0530 schrieb Utkarsh Gupta:
Hi,
> > Yep, I'm taking a look to prep something for 2.5.
>
> I've prepared a fix for the regression and uploaded the binaries at:
> https://people.debian.org/~utkarsh/lts/ruby2.5/
>
> Can you please give these a try and see if
Hi
Le Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 12:59:18PM +0100, Athanasius a écrit :
> I've just noticed this myself. Our smtp.log is from 2020-08-08
> onwards, so almost 2 years worth of logging. It's 28 MiB in size, so
> not disasterously big.
>
> I've added specific rotation of the other logfiles manually
Package: snapd
Version: 2.49-1+deb11u2
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: jordanlives...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
Simon McVittie (2023-06-07):
> Technically dbus has udebs, although as noted in the similar bookworm
> update request, they aren't directly useful for anything.
I only glanced at the discussion that happened a few hours/days ago on
IRC, but that seemed compelling. No objections from the d-i
Hi Kees,
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 6:53 PM Kees Meijs | Nefos wrote:
> I know you were asking Bernhard, but I downloaded and installed as well.
> Our Puppet agent seems to be happy again.
I had missed your comment in the bug but super, many thanks for
testing this out! I'll wait a bit more before
Hi Utkarsh,
Many thanks from our end.
I know you were asking Bernhard, but I downloaded and installed as well.
Our Puppet agent seems to be happy again.
Cheers,
Kees
On 07-06-2023 15:17, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
I've prepared a fix for the regression and uploaded the binaries at:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@packages.debian.org, debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:dbus
[ Reason ]
Fix a local denial of service for which the security team does not
Hi Bernhard,
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 4:16 PM Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Yep, I'm taking a look to prep something for 2.5.
I've prepared a fix for the regression and uploaded the binaries at:
https://people.debian.org/~utkarsh/lts/ruby2.5/
Can you please give these a try and see if that fixes the
Simon McVittie (2023-06-07):
> Technically dbus has udebs, although as noted above they are not
> directly useful for anything.
I only glanced at the discussion that happened a few hours/days ago on
IRC, but that seemed compelling. No objections from the d-i side.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
Package: dash
Version: 0.5.11+git20200708+dd9ef66-5
Version: 0.5.12-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
bullseye bash as well as bullseye, sid, and git dash observe the following:
$ cat -n boment
1 echo "$(head -n1 < and continues until there is a line containing only the
delimiter
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@packages.debian.org, debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:dbus
[ Reason ]
Fix a local denial of service for which the security team does not
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 3:09 PM Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
> Package: dhcpcd
> Version: 9.4.1-22
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> wheezy had a dhcpcd binary package built from src:dhcpcd at version
> 1:3.2.3-11+deb7u1 while bookworm has one built from
Package: sddm
Version: 0.19.0-5
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: p...@hands.com
Hello maintainers of sddm-greeter,
During automated testing of the d-i netinst image on openQA [1], the following
issue was found:
After the installation was completed and the virtual machine (2 GB memory, QXL
video
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 12:23:15 +0200 Bill Allombert
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 07:56:14PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Sean Whitton writes:
> >
> > > I think what's a bit peculiar here is using "must" for a case
where
> > > there might be package-specific exceptions. In other cases,
Package: nfs-ganesha
Version: 4.3-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
I'm trying to migrate my servers with nfs-kernel-server to nfs-ganesha
* What exactly did you do (or
Package: sd
Version: 0.7.6-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
squeeze had a sd binary package built from (unrelated) src:sd at
version 0.74-1 while bookworm has one built from src:rust-sd at
version 0.7.6-1 which is lower, violating the archive property of
Package: dhcpcd
Version: 9.4.1-22
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
wheezy had a dhcpcd binary package built from src:dhcpcd at version
1:3.2.3-11+deb7u1 while bookworm has one built from src:dhcpcd5 at
version 9.4.1-22 which is lower, violating the archive
Use of uninitialized value $processor in concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/share/perl5/NeedRestart/uCode.pm line 61.
[ucode] # did not get available microcode version
[uCode/AMD] #0 cpuid 0x00a50f00 (/dev/cpu/0/cpuid)
[uCode/AMD] #0 cpuid 0x00a50f00 (/proc/cpuinfo)
[uCode/AMD] #0 running ucode
This may be an upstream bug in version 2.11, because I observe the same
behavior in Ubuntu 23.04, which contains the same version of the
owncloud-client package. Upstream version 4.0.0 does not exhibit this bug.
L.
Hi
Noticed that was added in the upgrading section of the
release notes (looks to be introduced via #1035089) and I can parse that
(or can I?) but make validate does not pass clean with it.
brother@janmayen:~/git/other/debian/release-notes (master *)$ LC_ALL=C
make validate LINGUA=sv
Hi,
Hector Oron (2023-06-07):
> El mié, 7 jun 2023, 13:03, Cyril Brulebois escribió:
>
> > Hector Oron (2023-06-07):
> > > and Timonthy was able to test that. I could expand the change to ppc64
> > > (be) and cdrom targets and test that.
> > >
> > > Note, the ppc64el installer images are
Package: needrestart
Version: 3.6-4
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
enabled verbose on needrestart config because it fails to update my amd
cpu microcode
Hello
El mié, 7 jun 2023, 13:03, Cyril Brulebois escribió:
> Hector Oron (2023-06-07):
> > and Timonthy was able to test that. I could expand the change to ppc64
> > (be) and cdrom targets and test that.
> >
> > Note, the ppc64el installer images are unusable with that change, at
> > least on
FWIW, in Ubuntu, we had a similar issue trying to fix this CVE in ruby2.7,
and in the end we reverted the fix:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby2.7/2.7.0-5ubuntu1.10
Lucas Kanashiro.
Em qua., 7 de jun. de 2023 07:47, Utkarsh Gupta
escreveu:
> Hiya,
>
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 2:39 PM
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: Jonathan Nieder
Control: affects -1 + src:git
Control: block 987264 with -1
Control: block 984931 with -1
[ Reason ]
git-el in bullseye is uninstallable in any
Hi Simon,
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 02:36:01PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: dbus
> Version: 1.15.4-1
> Severity: important
> Tags: security
> X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
> Control: found -1 1.14.6-1
> Control: found -1 1.12.24-0+deb11u1
>
> If a privileged user with control over
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Control: block 996878 with -1
Control: affects -1 + src:libprelude
Control: tag 996878 patch pending
[ Reason ]
'import prelude' fails in python3 due to some missing symbol,
Hector Oron (2023-06-07):
> and Timonthy was able to test that. I could expand the change to ppc64
> (be) and cdrom targets and test that.
>
> Note, the ppc64el installer images are unusable with that change, at
> least on the Raptor systems
I don't think you answered my question about fbdev.
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 11:29, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 at 20:40:52 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Luca Boccassi writes:
> > > +Packages might need additional files or directories to implement their
> > > +functionality. Directories that are located under ``/var/`` or
> > >
Hiya,
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 2:39 PM Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Specifically
> https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2023/03/28/redos-in-uri-cve-2023-28755/
> states:
>
> | For Ruby 2.7: Update to uri 0.10.0.1
> | For Ruby 3.0: Update to uri 0.10.2
> | For Ruby 3.1: Update to uri 0.11.1
> | For
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 04:40, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> Luca Boccassi writes:
>
> > diff --git a/policy/ch-files.rst b/policy/ch-files.rst
> > index b34c183..30ce013 100644
> > --- a/policy/ch-files.rst
> > +++ b/policy/ch-files.rst
> > @@ -722,6 +722,43 @@ The name of the files and directories
Hello,
To be honest, I only updated ppc64el netboot image with the following patch:
--- a/build/pkg-lists/netboot/ppc64el.cfg
+++ b/build/pkg-lists/netboot/ppc64el.cfg
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
input-modules-${kernel:Version}
nic-modules-${kernel:Version}
+fb-modules-${kernel:Version} ?
On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 at 20:40:52 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Luca Boccassi writes:
> > +Packages might need additional files or directories to implement their
> > +functionality. Directories that are located under ``/var/`` or
> > +``/etc/``, and files that are located under ``/var/``, must not
Hi,
Hector Oron Martinez (2023-06-07):
> We found latest installer for bookworm is missing ast DRM kernel
> module, causing graphical failure on ppc64el Raptor machines. Could
> you please consider the following change or similar for the
> debian-installer bookworm release.
>
>
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 07:56:14PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes:
>
> > I think what's a bit peculiar here is using "must" for a case where
> > there might be package-specific exceptions. In other cases, Policy uses
> > "should" for these cases. Typically "must" rules are
Source: debian-installer
Version: 20230526
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: tpear...@raptorcs.com, zu...@debian.org
Hello,
We found latest installer for bookworm is missing ast DRM kernel module,
causing graphical failure on ppc64el Raptor machines. Could you please consider
the following
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
