Bug#926896: sysvinit-utils: pidof is unreliable

2020-05-01 Thread Костик Покотиленко
Caught this bug as well. Discussing here https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/issues/1491 Fedora ships pidof with procps-ng (procps on Debian) and does not have such problem. Debian ships pidof with sysvinit-utils which have this problem (skipping D and Z processes). There is no way

Bug#926896: sysvinit-utils: pidof is unreliable

2020-05-01 Thread Костик Покотиленко
This is regarding why this bug is not observed in Stretch and earlier. D and Z skipping behaviour was introduced by http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/sysvinit.git/commit/src/killall5.c?id=1b659c8ebebd86be51095ab905293889a306ff01 to resolve

Bug#926896: sysvinit-utils: pidof is unreliable

2020-05-01 Thread Костик Покотиленко
I wonder how many scripts have been silently broken пт, 1 мая 2020 г. в 16:04, Костик Покотиленко : > This is regarding why this bug is not observed in Stretch and earlier. > > D and Z skipping behaviour was introduced by > > http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/sysvinit.git/commit

Bug#926896: sysvinit-utils: pidof is unreliable

2020-05-01 Thread Костик Покотиленко
> So from what I gather, this means that procps's pidof has the problem > described in this bug report? > > From my point of view the only way to solve this without reopening > #719273 is to add a switch which recognizes D processes or not. Or > adds some kind of timeout. > > I don't think so,

Bug#926896: sysvinit-utils: pidof is unreliable

2020-05-25 Thread Костик Покотиленко
Hi. Is the any thoughts on resolution? Should the fix be expected for Buster?

Bug#986724: libc6: pthread_cond_wait missed wakeup

2021-04-10 Thread Костик Покотиленко
Package: libc6 Version: 2.28-10 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, In short, this bug causes condition variable signal (pthread_cond_signal) to be missed by condition variable waiters (pthread_cond_wait) in some circumstances. Bug is introduced in glibc 2.27. There are few patches to fix this