Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille til...@rki.de
* Package name: libicu4j-java
Version : 3.8.1
Upstream Author : IBM and contributors
* URL : http://www.icu-project.org/
* License : ICU4J license - ICU4J 1.8.1 and later
Permission
Hi Vincent,
are there any news about the packaging. Any preliminary stuff
to test? Any help needed? Did you decided which repository
you want to use?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
About the repository, I think the best is pkg-java, as the skills
required are more on the Java side than on the Biological side - but
please correct me if I'm wrong.
Well, there is no right or wrong - finally we have to store the
packaging stuff
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille til...@rki.de
* Package name: r-cran-plotrix
Version : 2.5
Upstream Author : Jim Lemon, Ben Bolker, Sander Oom, Eduardo Klein, and others
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/plotrix/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille til...@rki.de
* Package name: r-cran-colorspace
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Ross Ihaka ihaka at stat.auckland.ac.nz
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/colorspace
* License : BSD
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille til...@rki.de
* Package name: r-cran-msm
Version : 0.8.1
Upstream Author : Christopher Jackson chris.jackson at mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/msm/
* License : GPL2
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille til...@rki.de
* Package name: r-cran-sp
Version : 0.9.29
Upstream Author : Edzer J. Pebesma edzer.pebesma at uni-muenster.de
* URL : http://r-spatial.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL2+
Programming Lang: R
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille til...@rki.de
* Package name: r-cran-vcd
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : David Meyer David.Meyer at R-project.org
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vcd
* License : GPL2+
Programming Lang: R
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille til...@rki.de
* Package name: r-cran-spc
Version : 0.21
Upstream Author : en Knoth Sven.Knoth at gmx.de
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/spc/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: R
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
The Policy Draft you reference is somewhat outdated and in need of a
refresher.
I've thought this because it is quite old from the tome stamp but
I failwd to found something more recent.
As for the names: On a few of my more recent ITPs for R /
Hi Martijn,
I would like to report a problem with the latest version of zope-formulator.
I can confirm that I also have a similar problem with export / import of
zope-formulator objects so there really seems to be a problem.
I have the impression that zope formulator is not very actively
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Faheem Mitha wrote:
I have never used plr, but tried building it against 2.8 (CRAN version
2.8.1-1~etchcran.0) right now in an etch vserver, and it failed.
Should I report it to the plr mailing list?
No. I can reproduce this problem which is caused by the fact that
the
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Andreas Tille wrote:
You can work around this problem for your local installation by just
copying src/include/Rdevices.h into the plr source directory. The
you can build the package for the moment.
I have to revert this. I learned that Rgraphics.h is lacking as well
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
First off, thanks for maintaining pl-r. I wasn't aware that it has landed in
your lap. I was aware that the Pg maintainers didn't really want it (for lack
of R expertise) but I had no spare capacity to take it on myself.
Well, I used this package
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Joe Conway wrote:
I won't have time to digest this until the weekend, but I'll try to get back
to you by Monday.
That's perfectly all right.
Have a nice weekend
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Bastian Blank wrote:
Package: plr
Version: 1:8.3.0.6-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of plr_1:8.3.0.6-2 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 98
...
This is a known problem (#510251) which was discussed
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vincent Fourmond fourm...@debian.org
* Package name: jmol
Version : 11.6
Upstream Author : Jmol team
* URL : http://jmol.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
Subject says all. Both URLs below are broken:
Vcs-Browser:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/cdd/projects/science/trunk/debian-science/?rev=0sc=0
Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/cdd/projects/science/trunk/debian-science/
It is just fixed in the upload
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
Making this package depend on other libraries is both non-sensical and
useless. I suggest to change the following dependencies:
libglpk0 - libglpk-dev
libsuperlu3 - libsuperlu3-dev
libslepc2.3.2 - libslepc2.3.2-dev
libmesh0.6.1 - libmesh0.6.2-dev
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
imlib11 is scheduled for removal and since the eventual replacement
through cteddy isn't related, please request removal from the
archive.
Do you mean *now* is there any reason to keep it in unstable for
a while? The rationale is that xteddy is
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
Subject says all. Both URLs below are broken:
Vcs-Browser:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/cdd/projects/science/trunk/debian-science/?rev=0sc=0
Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/cdd/projects/science/trunk/debian-science/
It is just fixed in the upload
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
libgtkimreg0 is using imlib1 which should be removed
from the archive. The library is used by paul which
also is subject of removal (#456131).
Kind regards and thanks for maintaining ftp.debian.org
Andreas.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Barry deFreese wrote:
Haven't we already patched xteddy to use Imlib2?
The bug log says:
--
From: Barry deFreese bdefre...@debian.org
To: 370...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Start of patch for imlib2
Date: Wed, 10
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Josselin Mouette wrote:
the gnumed-client package uses a hard-coded path to the python modules:
GNUMEDDIR=/var/lib/python-support/python${PYVER}/Gnumed/wxpython
However, because of numerous requests from developers, the installation
path for these modules is going
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
* Move part or all of the files to a private modules directory.
Hopefully we can find another way.
IMHO this is the less invasive option and might keep the modules at
the place where you put them upstream - at least if I understood the
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Barry deFreese wrote:
Sorry, Peter DeWachter fixed up my patch and it should be working. Probably
needs some more testing? His patch is posted on this bug as well.
Ahh, great - I'll test it soon.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
The trivial seems to come about by the misbelief that our
module imports somehow use GNUMEDDIR which they do not.
That's only used to access gnumed.py, nothing else.
gnumed(.sh) is there exactly to *be* a shell wrapper around
gnumed.py to allow the
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Looking more closely, there is an even simpler way than that of
pychecker. Something like this should directly work:
python -m Gnumed.wxpython.gnumed
I'll think about this.
I don’t have one handy, but the idea is to consider it a regular
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Sundaram wrote:
I was wondering if you have uploaded the package to the Debian repository. I
apologize
if I sound demanding or pestering here :)
No pestering me is the right way to go. My plan is to do this either
at the weekend or at least next monday. Just try
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Sundaram wrote:
Wow! Never knew you would recommend pestering :0
SUre - but I have only the right to advise this for one
single person (=me). I would not recommend to try this to
others. ;-)
I am perfectly fine by the usage of cdbs, as you told earlier that its
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Sundaram wrote:
I would not recommend to try this to others. ;-)
Point taken. Gee! That (checking in) was fast for a single dosage of pestering
;)
That's why I recommended pestering - because it is normally helpful
(in my case). ;-)
Thanks for checking in the control
to be placed in
# /usr/bin/ and should be run to start a GNUmed
# client.
#
# $Source: /sources/gnumed/gnumed/gnumed/dists/Linux/gnumed,v $
# $Id: gnumed,v 1.21 2009/02/20 10:45:44 ncq Exp $
# license: GPL
# Karsten Hilbert, Sebastian Hilbert, Andreas Tille
Hi,
this seems like a nce target for Debian Science Mathematics
section. Petr, do you consider putting the package under
Debian Science team maintenance?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Petr Pudlak wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Petr Pudlak d...@pudlak.name
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Petr Pudlak (Debian) wrote:
yes, I thought that it would be a good idea, but I couldn't find exact
guidelines how
to do it. (Maybe it's just because I'm a bit tired after spending the whole
weekend
reading Debian documentation.)
I can package eprover according to
Hi Jan,
this might be an interesting add on for Debian Science Viewing task.
Would you consider group maintenance in the Debian Science team?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Jan Hendrik den Besten wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Hendrik den Besten
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Jan Hendrik den Besten wrote:
Fudgit would be my first package to maintain. I feel I must gain some
experience in that first - before I take up other tasks.
Well, nobody is forcing you to join a team - you are perfectly free
to do so. But I feel some inconsitency in your
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.10.35lenny2
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
DEHS is reporting new versions of GNUmed with the current watch file
which says:
http://www.gnumed.de/downloads/client/([\d\.]+)/GNUmed-client\.(.*)\.tgz
These new versions are only release candidates (0.4-rc\d) which should
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I believe this boils down to basically the same request as #375138,
which has been marked wontfix for a couple of years.
I admit this seems to be the same problem - sorry fo not verifying
BTS properly.
I haven't merged
them yet as I'm undecided as
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Petr Pudlak (Debian) wrote:
as I was suggested, I'm looking for a sponsor for the eprover package,
who would help me with publishing the package.
If you are seeking for a sponsor it is a clever idea to post the
URL to your *.dsc file to enable others to evaluate your
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
* Package name: libxfce4menu
Version : 4.6.0
Upstream Author : Jannis Pohlmann jan...@xfce.org
* URL : http://www.xfce.org.org/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : freedesktop.org compliant
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
tag 517010 pending
thanks
Thanks. ;-)
thanks for the suggestion. I corrected the description in our Subversion
repository, and the change will be part of the next upload (maybe not so soon…).
Any specific reason to wait with an upload. IMHO it
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
Yes, the end of the coffee break :)
;-)
Do not hesitate to upload if you are currently examining njplot. I can do it
later, but I already shifted my attention to other packages.
OK. I'm probably busy + offline until sunday evening. If nothing
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Petr Pudlak (Debian) wrote:
dget -u http://petr.pudlak.name/deb/eprover_1.0.004-1.dsc
I had a short look onto your work and would like to give some
comments. At first you obviousely did a good job to create a
lintian clean package of a complex software! Considering that
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
Package: aeskulap
Version: 0.2.2b1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi all,
I was browsing aeskulap's PTS page and found the Ubuntu bug 229681:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aeskulap/+bug/229681
Basically, the
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, fran...@debian.org wrote:
You should change your build-dep from 'proj' to 'libproj-dev' and
eventually also depend on 'proj-bin' if debian-science requires proj
command-line tools to work, i.e.:
/usr/bin/geod /usr/bin/proj /usr/bin/cs2cs /usr/bin/nad2bin
/usr/bin/nad2nad
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Package: libgtkdatabox
Version: 1:0.9.0.1-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: Junichi Uekawa dan...@debian.org, d-shl...@packages.debian.org
From my pbuilder build log:
...
dh_link -plibgtkdatabox-0.9.0-1
dh_installmime -plibgtkdatabox-0.9.0-1
#
Hi,
I would like to ask for help of the mips porter team whether they might have a
clue
why this build fails. It seems to me that some graphics / Motif issues might be
involved in the problem.
Any help is welcome
Andreas.
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Package: arb
Hi,
when checking out the rasmol git repository[1] I noticed that the
changelog says:
rasmol (2.7.4.2-4) unstable; urgency=low
* rules: Allow building GTK and X11 versions separately for testing
* Merge patches/gtk-shortcuts: Add various keyboard shortcuts
to the GTK interface
*
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 09:49:01AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
I would like to ask for help of the mips porter team whether they might have a
clue
why this build fails. It seems to me that some graphics / Motif issues might be
involved
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Actually, I realize you have a local copy in debian/, which is still broken.
While I used this in former times to circumvent some problems this is
not true for libdatabox. Where did you got this impression from?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
Hi,
in October last year there was a longish discussion about name space
pollution regarding plink. If you like to spend some time you should
read the complete log of #503367 [1].
I decided to put an end now on this issue to make sure it will
not remain as is for ever and renamed the entry in
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Two questions are left on my side:
1. On the one hand plink upstream claimed on their website[3] that
Debian *has* renamed plink to snplink (which is not really true
because the discussion ended without any real action). But Gentoo
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Steffen Moeller wrote:
we should ask the technical committee to rule over it. And maybe this
needs some voting in the end.
Who is this *we*? Do you volunteer?
IMHO plink should be renamed because it is way less popular than the
putty tool. So we will loose this voting
Hi,
a Debian Science task meteorology comes to mind ...
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry mckins...@debian.org
* Package name: CDO
Version : 1.3.0
Upstream Author : Uwe
) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Fix usage of init scripts debian/dict-wn.{postinst,prerm}
+Closes: #522916
+
+ -- Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:58:07 +0200
+
wordnet (1:3.0-14) unstable; urgency=low
* Removed redundant part from description
Index: dict-wn.postrm
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Package: science-physics
Version: 0.5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 5.6.7
Suggests contains 'ESPResSo++, PWscf', but upper-case letters are not allowed in
package names.
Fixed in SVN. I might consider to lowercase any package names
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
- if you ask others for review, you shouldn't have whitespace changes in the
diff.
Yes - sorry. I somehow expected this hint after I sended the mail.
- you shouldn't _restart_ the daemon in postrm :-) (and probably not call
dictconfig neither)
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, David Moreno wrote:
That's correct, the mailing list has been renamed and /most/ of its
services have been migrated. As you say, yes, the web archives still
need to be moved. I hadn't spoken about this since the main reason
for not finishing it was lacking time on my side.
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Please find attached a watch file for biococoa.app. There are two
possible solutions to catch the version. The first one catches all
releases based on the web-SVN service at bioinformatics.org (and also
allows to download a tarball). The second one at
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
It would be nice if the long description of your package could consist
of full sentences[1], the first part is not really one. :)
Before we do another round of this non sentence bug reports just have a
look at
This R package provides functions
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Package: r-cran-xtable
Ahh, I've found the reassign, but I wonder whether you like my change to xtable
--- control (Revision 35604)
+++ control (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
Architecture: all
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, r-base-core
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Scott Christley wrote:
There was some copyright/license issues that needed to be resolved.
Those should all be resolved now,
I'd be very happy if somebody might have a look at biococoa. I have
polished packaging regarding inclusion of documentation and examples,
updating
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Yavor Doganov wrote:
GNUstep frameworks are packaged like classic shared libraries (that's
what they are, in fact), i.e. the biococoa source package should build
the binary packages libbiococoa2 and libbiococoa-dev.
Fine.
You don't need
the Replaces/Conflicts/Provides:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Yavor Doganov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:12:11PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
I had the impression that sequenceconverter.app builds and runs
fine without biococoa - strange, but worked on my machine.
Right, I wrongly assumed that it links against BioCocoa.
So
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Here it is. I added some comments in debian/rules for things that
might not be entirely obvious to you -- feel free to strip them.
No, comments are perfectly OK - in contrary, they should be there.
I committed your changes and thank you very much for
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Yavor Doganov wrote:
All right. I like comments, but some maintainers consider them
redundant.
I always consider them helpful.
Thanks! I see that you added me to the project -- does that mean that
I can commit without pre-approval
Yep! That was the idea as I said
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Laurent Fousse wrote:
I can't reproduce the problem, running feh 1.3.4.dfsg.1-1 on an i386
remotely from a ppc.
So you would agree if I would close this bug?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi listmasters,
is there any number of promoters which might convince you that this
list is needed? I have some announcements to make, some work to do
which should be organised over this list. I would love to see this
list created in the next seven days if possible. If you are not
yet
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Carlo Segre wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlo Segre se...@debian.org
* Package name: libxray-absorption-perl
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : Bruce Ravel bra...@bnl.gov
* URL : http://cars9.uchicago.edu/svn/libperlxray
*
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Petr Pudlak (Debian) wrote:
Hi Andreas, everybody,
I moved the package into the git repository:
Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/eprover.git
Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=debian-science/packages/eprover.git
and adapted the package for GIT.
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
It has been suggested a few times (471410, 511329, 516723) to
add an accessibility item to tasksel, which would e.g. install
gnome-accessibility. The task would be automatically selected when
accessibility features was used during d-i itself.
I
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Carlo Segre wrote:
This module supports access to X-ray absorption data. It is designed
to be a transparent interface to absorption data from a variety of
sources. Currently, the only sources of data are the 1969 McMaster
tables, the 1999 Elam tables, the 1993 Henke
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Petr Pudlak (Debian) wrote:
I moved the package into the git repository:
Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/eprover.git
Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=debian-science/packages/eprover.git
and adapted the package for GIT.
I commited some
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
$ apt-cache search accessibility
which is quite weak.
Tags FTW. Look for Accessibility tags and you'll find a lot of
packages.
Sure. But do all our package handling tool support DebTags?
Are our users aware of DebTags. (Well I admit they
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
I just wanted to ask you whether you have seen my patch for #370822
already, and whether you need something else to be done there as well.
I usually don't nag people, but I took the liberty of asking you since
you are usually quick with mail (unless you
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
I'll send you a patch to expand it to a somewhat bigger list.
Great. It is applied and shows up at the tasks pages now.
I'm sthibaul-guest on alioth.
You are now able to commit the changes yourself.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Wonderful to hear that upstream will support your release. It would
be nice to synchronize the upload with the release on the official
homepage.
This exactly is my plan
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
* Package name: dots
Version : 0.0.20090222
Upstream Author : Eitan Isaacson ei...@ascender.com
* URL : https://github.com/eeejay/dots/tree
* License : GPLv3
Description : braille translation user interface
Dots
Hi Shaun,
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:55:54AM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
IGV has a lot of dependencies, and the list follows. Many of these
dependencies are already in Debian; many others are not. Where the
dependency is satisfied, I've given the Debian package name. Where
it's not satisfied,
Package: libcomplearn
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
I was alarmed by the new version available message I've got but then
I noticed that there is just a missing '.' in the debian/watch file.
Please use this as watch file content:
version=3
http://complearn.org/download.html \
Package: wesnoth-1.8
Severity: normal
Hi,
I would regard it as highly confusing if the new version of a program is
hidden behind a version number and I stick to the old version after an
upgrade. It took me some time to realise that we actually have wesnoth
1.8 in Debian (I admit I was not
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:58:00AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
There will be a meta package, as outlined in my blog post:
http://rhonda.deb.at/blog/debian/2010/06/09
I'm lacking an explanation what might make Wesnoth so special compared
to other games that Debian (aka Release team and
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:19:19AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
I'm lacking the information that you are part of either team or are
needed to specifically be made aware of the communication with those
teams.
I can give you precise information about this: I'm not a part of either
team - I just
Hi,
when reading this bug report I would like to *repeat* my hint which
I have given since about 1.5 years in different forms that anybody
with a login on Alioth can see this kind of problems by doing a
less
/var/lib/gforge/chroot/home/users/tille/blends/webtools/logs/debian-edu.err
For
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 03:25:42PM +0200, François Boulogne wrote:
I installed openjdk-6-jre, and it works like a charm here. :)
So I'll upload a package which just drops the alternative java2-runtime
as Dependency.
Greetings from Bordeaux (LSM)
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu
* Package name: freediams
Version : 0.4.2
Upstream Author : Eric Maeker eric.mae...@free.fr
* URL : http://www.freemedforms.com/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi listmasters,
after some discussion on the pkg-grass mailing lists[1] which are currently
used to do general discussions and not only issues about packaging GRASS
we came up with the conclusion that it is better to have a dedicated
mailing list for
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 08:15:10AM -0700, Hamish wrote:
Yo!! more than 29 minutes between publicly posting a request-
for-comments (in a CC) and declaring a motion passed and acting
on it, please! Not cool.
Sorry, if I stepped on anybodys shoes (and yes, it is actually not so
cool here (32°C
Hi Francesco,
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 03:40:53PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
I have not specific preferences about lists, I simply would note that
pkg-grass-general/devel were born at the time to manage a low traffic
packaging oriented list and listmasters had the opinion that
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
* Package name: debichem
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Michael Banck mba...@debian.org, Andreas Tille
ti...@debian.org
* URL : Native package
* License : GPL
Description : Set
Package: games-thumbnails
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I would like to suggest that you obtain the screenshots directly from
screenshots.debian.net to build the source of this package instead of
asking users to send screenshots via mail. I'm really sure that you
will be able to find a way to set up a
Hi Claudia,
the naming conflicts with ctapimkt become worse as you see. Both
header files
/usr/include/config.h in this bug report and
/usr/include/ctapi.h in #557495
have naming conflicts. Putting a header file with such a generic name
like config.h into a default directory is bad and
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 07:13:36PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
Most of the non-free Debian Science / Med packages suffer from this in
some way.
Yes. :-(
I've made some efforts to get non-free reactivated and at
least for powerpc it should be fixed now.
Great.
We will try to add more
Hi again,
as an additional note there is another form of translations missing from
the data you are providing. The Qt way to do the translations which ends
up in files progname_lang.qm as the can for instance be found in
texmaker
/usr/share/texmaker/texmaker_lang.qm
are also not covered by
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 09:44:29PM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
I suggest we add Conflicts: headers for varnish-dev and libvxl1-dev
against each other, as I do not like the idea of renaming any of the
libraries.
There was recently a discussion on debian-de...@l.d.o[1] concerning a
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 01:06:15PM +, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Excerpts from Omar Alejandro Silva's message of Thu Jun 17 17:42:26 +
2010:
Accessing Sugar from desktop terminals or thinstations is important, please
don`t forget it while removing packages.
education-desktop-sugar is a
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 01:35:56PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
If someone cares about this package enough to maintain it, changing the
description (to point out that it's LTSP + Sugar, not Sugar on a desktop)
and updating the dependencies should be enough. But without an active
maintainer
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu
* Package name: debian-gis
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Petter Reinholdtsen p...@debian.org, Andreas Tille
ti...@debian.org
* URL : native package
* License : GPL
Description
Package: josm
Version: 0.0.svn3376-1
Severity: minor
Hi,
when starting Josm and quiting it immediately I get the following
error messages on console:
$ josm
Using /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/bin/java to execute josm.
Debian-Release: 0.0.svn3376-1
Build-Date: 2010-07-18 15:51:31
Revision: 3376
Package: maxima
Severity: minor
Hi,
maxima recommends gv explicitely as pdf-viewer or postscript-viewer.
Please use
pdf-viewer | gvor
postscript-viewer | gv
depending of what type of documents will be really viewed.
The rationale is that people who install maxima will
801 - 900 of 8644 matches
Mail list logo