Bug#731583: Status?

martin f krafft madd...@debian.org writes: found -1 1.8.10p3-1 severity -1 serious thanks This bug persists, and I think we should not release the next stable with it! I call it bug because the behaviour changed and sudo no longer works in situations where it previously worked. Also, there

Bug#762915: Please convert all scripts to not use bash

severity 762915 important tags 762915 +pending thanks Klaus Ethgen kl...@ethgen.de writes: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Package: gzip Version: 1.6-3 Severity: grave Please convert all scripts (zcat, zless, ...) to use /bin/sh as shell and not /bin/bash. Most of them

Bug#769972: New CTTE members

Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes: Package: tech-ctte Severity: minor User: tech-c...@packages.debian.org Usertag: consensus-seeking On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Bdale Garbee wrote: I see that Don has added an agenda item about this to our next IRC meeting scheduled for 4 December, but I don't

Bug#746578: Revised call for votes (was libpam-systemd to flip dependencies - proposal)

Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes: I am calling for votes on the text below: Y (override, swap dependencies, requires 3:1) FD I vote Y FD. Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#762194: Alternative proposal for init switch on upgrades.

Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com writes: Do people use the usb stick/cd/dvd etc for upgrades to jessie, i.e. the debian installer. Or do they only use apt/aptitude/etc? I don't know that we can speak in absolutes, but I've never personally seen or heard of anyone using debian-installer

Bug#770656: debian-history: Important Events section is missing info about deaths since 2010

Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes: Package: debian-history Version: 2.19 Severity: wishlist I'm not sure what the criteria for a death being listed in the Important Events section but these deaths are not listed: We've never really had an explicit criteria, but I'm fine with including them.

Bug#731583: sudo FQDN issue: How can I help?

Christian Kastner deb...@kvr.at writes: Hi, with a patch now available for the versions in testing and in unstable, I believe what still needs to be done is: 1. Negotiate with RT which version they'd be willing to accept 2. Prepare a package including the application patch version

Bug#770789: Draft of option for #770789

Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes: Please vote [A] for Decline to override, and [FD] for Further Discussion. I vote A, FD. Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#774490: tar: Please generate -dbg package for tar

Vincent Stehl? vincent.ste...@laposte.net writes: Would you please consider generating a `-dbg' package for tar, with debug symbols? I don't object, but it would be more likely to happen sooner if someone offers me a patch that implements it. Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#776137: sudo: fails to switch between sudo and sudo-ldap: chown: cannot access '/etc/sudoers': No such file or directory

Christian Kastner deb...@kvr.at writes: Bdale, once such a confirmation (or another fix) is in, how would you like to proceed? I could help with the RT communication again Sure. I'm willing to merge a patch and do uploads, but need to know which path they want me to use since the sudo in

Bug#769972: Draft new member ballot

Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au writes: ​The way it was done last time was: That was to decide between two final candidates for one open position. We now have 2 present and one pending (Colin's) open positions, and have discussed the nominated list of candidates privately as has been our

Bug#779363: debian/rules fails to rebuild manual pages if necessary

Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes: I noticed this while when backporting fixes for CVE-2014-9680 to squeeze-lts, where POD is still the master format. Thanks for pointing it out... /o\ Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#769972: Read before Voting: Note from hartmans about new member ballots

Sam Hartman hartm...@debian.org writes: I regret bringing this up at such a late point, although I couldn't come up with any better options. I didn't want to just have a discussion with Bdale and the DPL. By this time next year, more than half the sitting TC will be new, so there's every

Bug#769972: Call for Votes for new CTTE Members

Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes: ===BEGIN The Technical Committee recommends that Sam Hartman (hartmans) be appointed by the Debian Project Leader to the Technical Committee. A: Recommend to Appoint Sam Hartman (hartmans) B: Further Discussion ===END A B ===BEGIN The Technical

Bug#762465: sudo: Include future-timestamp patch for jessie

Christian Kastner deb...@kvr.at writes: All of the RC fixes have been in unstable for a while now, so an upload to t-p-u could be negotiated now with the RT. If you'd like me to take care of that, please let me know. Go for it. I'm likely to remain too busy to work on it much for the next

Bug#748244: Severity change?

Robin Sheat ro...@catalyst.net.nz writes: Is it worth increasing the severity of this, given it's preventing things like uscan from working? Out of curiosity, why is uscan trying to remove files from a tarball to start with? That seems way out of scope for a program that supposedly helps look

Bug#783678: cc1111: mcs51 assembler is not a drop-in replacement for sdcc's

Eric Cooper e...@cooper-siegel.org writes: The sdcc package ships its mcs51 assembler as sdas8051, while the cc package ships it as asx8051. Installing it also with the latter name would make it more likely that existing Makefiles would work unmodified. I suspect, without looking, that

Bug#784273: cc1111: incompletely-disabled warning message 18

Eric Cooper e...@cooper-siegel.org writes: Why does the __code storage class affect it? Neither Keith nor I have any idea. Have you tried the same code with current SDCC to see if things perhaps work better there? Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#784273: cc1111: incompletely-disabled warning message 18

Eric Cooper e...@cmu.edu writes: While I was looking at the code, I saw that the fix for my original complaint was pretty trivial, so I've attached a patch. Oh, cool! Thanks for the patch, I'll fold it in and make another upload shortly. Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#789996: please update to at least 3.14.10

Package: hplip Severity: wishlist The current version of hplip in unstable is 3.14.6, but upstream is now at 3.15.6. A new device I just purchased for my wife is supported starting with version 3.14.10. Be nice if an updated package appeared... Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#795857: simple solution?

The suggestion someone made somewhere during this discussion that I liked the best was quite simple. Every time there is a change in the membership of the TC, we should have a vote on who should serve as chair. Given the term limits now in place, that would guarantee a fairly regular need to

Bug#795857: Bug#795855: Bug#636783: Bug#795855: #636783 - New bugs for individual issues

Sam Hartman hartm...@debian.org writes: I'm just sying having seen it used once I'd rather decide never to go there again. For what it's worth, I agree. Even in the worst of times, I'm personally just fine with extreme boundary conditions being left to human sensibility. We have a pretty

Bug#765639: Bug#802159: New OpenSSL upstream version

Kurt Roeckx writes: > The alternative is that I go and cherry pick the important bug > fixes. By this time there are really a lot that I would like to > have in the stable releases and I think going that way actually > has a higher chance of breaking things. We've run into this

Bug#798947: chirp: unsupported firmware: N5R3409BFP3-25. Please package more often

Arturo Borrero Gonzalez writes: > Would you please upload more often to debian unstable or to debian > experimental? The packages in Debian currently reflect the latest upstream release. I don't have the time or motivation to package unreleased versions of chirp

Bug#804378: please remove me

Package: withsqlite Severity: wishlist Please remove me from the Uploaders list for this package. Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#804149: squeeze update of sudo?

Raphael Hertzog writes: > If you don't want to take care of this update, it's not a problem, we > will do our best with your package. Just let us know whether you would > like to review and/or test the updated package before it gets > released. I would be pleased to review

Bug#804377: please remove me

Package: ntp Severity: wishlist Please remove me from the Uploaders field for ntp. It has been a long time since I did any work on the package, and I'm gradually trying to get control of my email volume about things I'm no longer working on. Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#797206: debian-history: out-of-date leaders list

Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes: Package: debian-history Version: 2.19 §2 reads: “Lucas Nussbaum was elected in April 2013 and is our current leader.” But Lucas is no longer the current leader. Thanks for pointing this out. I'll get to it eventually, but source patches for the document

Bug#795764: freedombox-setup: Remove provide-source script

Sunil Mohan su...@medhas.org writes: On 08/16/2015 11:55 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [...] pere, would you please comment on whether this is okay? I suspect Bdale might know more about it. Bdale, would you please commit on it. The issue isn't that there were once packages outside

Bug#741573: CFV: Debian Menu Systems

Sam Hartman writes: > I'd like to call for votes on the following resolution: I vote D > A=B > Z > C. Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#797533: New CTTE members

Don Armstrong writes: > I personally cannot reasonably dedicate more than an hour or two a week > to the CTTE, and I suspect that few people serving can either. 2 hours a week seems pretty consistent with what I think I've spent over the years. The initsystem debate was a

Bug#808233: p10cfgd still depends on perl5

Niko Tyni <nt...@debian.org> writes: > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 08:24:09AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >> > # still depends on perl5 >> > found 808233 1.0-15 >> Bug #808233 {Done: Bdale Garbee <bd...@gag.com>} [p10cfgd] p10cfgd: Depen

Bug#796263: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#796263: pcb-lesstif: SIGSEGV when clicking `Next' in `DRC check' Message Box

Johann Klammer writes: > This seems to be the same as: > > > > A workaround seems to be not to use the line drawing tool in DRC > mode/stopping DRC mode to draw... I was able to complete editing that > way... Ok, good, because I'd

Bug#798864: version 5.2 is out now

Upstream is now at version 5.2. Bdale

Bug#827017: thanks

Thanks for pointing this out. It will take a bit of work to implement, since the way I split the tar upstream source to create the tar and non-free tar-doc packages will need to be updated. But I agree using upstream's man pages is a worthwhile change, and they do not appear to have license

Bug#827874: new upstream version 20160615 available

"Iain R. Learmonth" <i...@fsfe.org> writes: > On 22/06/16 00:59, Bdale Garbee wrote: >> Package: chirp >> Severity: wishlist >> >> There's a new upstream version out, which chirpw cheerfully insists >> on telling me about every time I run

Bug#827874: new upstream version 20160615 available

Package: chirp Severity: wishlist There's a new upstream version out, which chirpw cheerfully insists on telling me about every time I run the program... Bdale

Bug#825455: fixed in git for next upload

tags 825455 +pending thanks Change made in the project git repo, will be part of our next upload to Debian. Bdale

Bug#824631: tar: please enable parallel and verbose builds (again)

Gianfranco Costamagna writes: > Package: tar > Version: 1.29-1 > Severity: important > Tags: patch > > patch attached. > > Please ack or nack that patch, instead of just overriding my two > previous NMUs I did. Sorry, apparently some emails got lost since I was unaware

Bug#806092: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#806092: pcb: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (No such file or directory)

Santiago Vila writes: > I have the ok from the Release Managers to consider this issue as RC > for stretch. I'm going to wait at least one week before raising > this to "serious". Go ahead and raise the severity whenever you want. I'll be happy to take a look at this, but I

Bug#777416: gcpegg: please make the build reproducible

Chris Lamb writes: > Dear Maintainer, > >> Source: gcpegg >> Version: 5.1-13 >> Tags: patch > > There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 553 days, in which > time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :) > > Would you consider applying this patch and

Bug#829624: mdocml: FTBFS on hurd-i386: 'PATH_MAX' undeclared

"Aaron M. Ucko" writes: > This is a common portability issue on the Hurd, which imposes no hard > limit here. IIRC, the usual fix is to add a conditional definition: > > #ifndef PATH_MAX > # define PATH_MAX 4096 > #endif I stuck this in a header file included by just

Bug#829018: working on it

I've got it building, the package isn't quite complete yet, but will be soon. Bdale

Bug#809984: working on it...

I've packaged and uploaded mdocml/mandoc, as soon as it's accepted into the archive I'll be able to update the build process for sudo to fix this. Bdale

Bug#854009: soundmodem: starts kiss device with incorrect permissions

Dave Hibberd writes: > I think dialout is an easier group to deal with for those of us who are > using hardware TNCs also - it means everything is caught by the same > group. I don't much fancy writing udev rules to catch every TNC when we > can just treat them like a serial

Bug#847131: patch merged

tags 847131 +pending thanks Patch merged into my git repo, will be part of the next upload. Bdale

Bug#855839: gzip: Getting gzip v 1.8 in Debian

shirish शिरीष writes: > I came to know that gzip v1.8 was released quite sometime back but it > isn't in Debian :( Hrm. I seem to have missed the announcement. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#837351: tar: FTBFS on kfreebsd: --numeric-owner basic tests FAILED

Andreas Beckmann writes: > 30: --numeric-owner basic tests FAILED (numeric.at:29) I'm unlikely to find time to investigate this soon. Help figuring out what's going wrong and how to fix it would be appreciated. Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP

Bug#839570: Browserified javascript and DFSG 2 (reopening)

Adrian Bunk writes: > Only DFSG-free packages that depend on non-free software are allowed > in contrib. At Debconf in Heidelberg, this definition was tweaked somewhat by inspiration of the sitting DPL in light of the ZFS discussion to include software which itself is free, but

Bug#842507: sudo: CVE-2016-7076: noexec bypass via wordexp()

Salvatore Bonaccorso writes: > CVE-2016-7076[0]: > noexec bypass via wordexp() For unstable, the obvious choice is to package and upload 1.8.18p1. I'll get to that as soon as I can. Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#846002: blends-tasks must not be priority:important (was Re: Bug#846002: Lowering severity)

Philip Hands writes: > So, I'd say that the whole thing was a car-crash anyway, and this just > dropped a cigarette in the spilling petrol. Yeah. I'm not immediately sure to suggest as a way to do things differently, and this may not seem immediately helpful... but about the

Bug#793660: Is still an issue

Borden Rhodes writes: > The Fedora patch link is dead now, but I just got bitten by this bug. > How difficult would it be to apply the patch to Debian's copy of sudo > if upstream won't fix it? I don't use sssd, so have never seen the problem. It also appears that the

Bug#850816: Please provide a backport for jessie-backports

Michael Stapelberg writes: > I’m happy to help with doing the backporting — just let me know. I'd be pleased to have your help with it. Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#793660: Is still an issue

Borden Rhodes writes: > I'm on Debian Stretch, so I use libsss-sudo version 1.14.2-1 and > version 1.8.17p1-2 of sudo. I've since uninstalled libsss-sudo but can > reinstall it for debugging purposes. I'd be curious to know if sudo 1.8.18p1-2 still exhibits the problem.

Bug#806092: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#806092: proposed fix

Dima Kogan writes: > I'm attaching two patches to fix this. Please review soon if > possible. If I don't hear back by Dec 26, I'll NMU this. That's the > latest possible day to meet the cutoff for stretch. Thank you for your work on this. I see that an upload has happened.

Bug#858095: atlc FTBFS on mips: Build killed with signal TERM after 360 minutes of inactivity

Adrian Bunk writes: > Now one test is taking over 6 hours (is that completely hanging?). I have no idea. Never seen that happen. Makes me wonder what's changed in your kernel or toolchain since the last build? Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#857585: emacs startup provided in wrong package

Package: ledger Version: 3.1.2-pre1+g3a00e1c+dfsg1-2 The /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50ledger.el file is provided in the package ledger, but the associated lisp code is all provided in the ledger-el package. Sure seems like the site-start.d contribution should be in the same package that provides

Bug#862309: Don't install /etc/sudoers.dist sample file

tags 862309 +pending thanks Michael Biebl writes: > the latest update installed a new conffile /etc/sudoers.dist. Thanks for catching this. I didn't notice when the upstream Makefile changed to deliver this by default. Fixed in my revision control system for the next

Bug#865428: tar-scripts: make tar-scripts package depend on tar package

tags 865428 +pending thanks Alexander Lazarević writes: > The tar-scripts package got extracted out of the tar package with > version 1.26+dfsg-9 and should depend on any newer tar package version > from there on. It should also be in conflict with older tar packages, > that

Bug#862309: Don't install /etc/sudoers.dist sample file

Paul Wise writes: > it might be useful to install it as an example instead. Sure, makes sense, and easy to do. Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#786555: sudo: time stamp files no longer invalidated at boot

Michael Biebl writes: > Building with > --with-rundir=/run/sudo \ > --with-vardir=/var/lib/sudo \ > seems to achieve that. Oh, neat! > Bdale, would you be ok with that change? If so, I could prepare a patch > depending on whether you want to

Bug#837351: tar: FTBFS on kfreebsd: --numeric-owner basic tests FAILED

James Clarke writes: > Do you think you'd be able to prepare an upload with this, please > (experimental is fine if you want to leave unstable alone)? I just uploaded 1.29b-2 to unstable, with more test verbosity and capture of the regression test in the build log. I did a

Bug#870456: postinst script is not executed until the end skipping debhelper bits

Laurent Bigonville writes: > It seems that the postinst script is exiting in the middle of the script > if the sudo group exists bypassing all the bits added by debhelper. Not intentional, but it looks like the only thing there is the dh_installinit fragment setting up the

Bug#863757: unblock: sudo/1.8.19p1-1

+ + -- Bdale Garbee <bd...@gag.com> Tue, 30 May 2017 22:35:01 -0600 + sudo (1.8.19p1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * new upstream version diff -Nru sudo-1.8.19p1/debian/patches/CVE-2017-1000367.patch sudo-1.8.19p1/debian/patches/CVE-2017-1000367.patch --- sudo-1.8.19p1/debian/patches/CV

Bug#876139: pcb-rnd user security patch

Package: release.debian.org The pcb-rnd upstream has released a patch that closes a hole through which arbitrary code can be executed if a user opens a maliciously crafted printed circuit board design file. There is no known instance of this being exploited in the field, there is no root

Bug#874692: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#874692: /usr/bin/gschem: Redrawing of text sometimes has horizontal errors

Joe Rowan writes: > I have not used gschem for some months, so I have no idea when this > began. It happens with .sch files of various ages. I just noticed this last night myself. It's "new". as in something else changed that's affecting gschem since the behavior has

Bug#877005: send_summary script referenced in default cron.d file does not exist

Package: burp Version: 2.0.54-1 The /etc/cron.d/burp file delivered with the burp package has a couple of commented-out lines for use on the server. One of those invokes the script /etc/burp/send_summary. Unfortunately, no such script is provided in the package, and I don't see any obvious

Bug#877516: sudo-ldap: fails to upgrade due to insserv rejecting the script header

Andreas Beckmann writes: > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install due > to insserv rejecting the script header. Thanks for letting me know. > We had a similar problem in the past ... #719755 > Looks like the fix for #870456 "enabled" this bug

Bug#877024: modemmanager should ask before messing with serial ports

Aleksander Morgado writes: I'm no longer a TC member, but have been bitten by this problem, so will chime in. > Would the new approach satisfy Debian's needs? It seems so to me. The key thing I care about is that we *not* assume any arbitrary cdc-acm device is a

Bug#884741: sudo-ldap: Lacking support for SSSD

Thore writes: > Package: sudo-ldap > Version: 1.8.19p1-2.1 > Severity: wishlist > > Good evening, > while trying to integrate SSSD for LDAP authentication the sudo provider > constantly failed. > After a while of searching for a reason I came across this: > > sudo -V > Sudo

Bug#897653: tar 1.30 breaks pristine-tar

Paul Eggert writes: > On 05/14/2018 07:56 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >> I still need to study the > code a bit further to try to come up with a >> better suggestion. > Sorry, the only suggestion I can make is that you should just use the > new GNU tar. The old one was

Bug#846490: tar(5) page never existed

tags 846490 +pending thanks Upstream indicates that there was never a section 5 man page for the tar archive format in the GNU tar sources, thus the "see also" reference to such a page is now removed from the upstream section 1 man page for tar. I've put an equivalent patch into my source tree

Bug#854878: /bin/zgrep: Confirmed + patch

Ben Wong writes: > Looking at the man page for grep(1), it's clear that the > --binary-files option (and perhaps future --binary-* options) was what > the script was trying to emulate, but the programmer simply forgot the > "--" prefix. Thanks for the patch. Bdale

Bug#901952: find the commit

We need to isolate which upstream commit caused the behavior change. I've got other things to work on that are higher priority to me right now, so help from someone more motivate to chase this down would be appreciated. Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#901636: mandoc: "mandoc -mdoc -T man" causes memory dump

Bjarni Ingi Gislason writes: > Output from "mandoc -mdoc -T man groff_mdoc.7": Where is "groff_mdoc.7" from? I have no such file on my system, so there's no way for me to try and reproduce this error. Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#895435: Unclear License

"Jason Self" writes: > Package: as31 > Version: 2.3.1-6+b2 > > The copyright file mentions only that as31 is "provided under the BSD > license." > > Which one? Upstream doesn't specify, but given the date of that assertion versus what was considered the "default" BSD license at various points

Bug#905412: ITP: lepton-eda -- Lepton Electronic Design Automation

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist I'm working to package the Lepton EDA suite, a fork of the gEDA suite I already help maintain within the electronics team: https://github.com/lepton-eda Bdale

Bug#905080: O: as31 - Intel 8031/8051 assembler

Package: wnpp Severity normal I no longer have any personal need for as31, so would like to drop it from the list of packages I maintain. I recently uploaded a fix for the segfault encountered building the usbdux driver in the firmware-nonfree source package. The only remaining open bug regards

Bug#906785: patch that fixes my immediate problem

Attached is a patch that fixed my immediate problem, the ability to build packages using ant that remain compatible with Java 1.6. Bdale From 07a73a1b2f10255ec9535f66db82a192780611b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bdale Garbee Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 20:49:42 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] see if we can

Bug#906785: version warping patch is overly aggressive

Package: ant Version: 1.10.5-1 Severity: important The Debian ant package is built with a patch "0013-auto-adjust-target.patch" that forces the Java target version number to 7. The utterly breaks the ability to use Debian ant for building Java applications that get wrapped up in installer

Bug#906785: version warping patch is overly aggressive

Markus Koschany writes: > we all assumed that OpenJDK 11 will remove support for source/target > 1.6. After a discussion on the OpenJDK mailing list they decided to > postpone this change for OpenJDK 12. [1] Aha, that helps explain things. Thanks. > The current patch simplifies our packaging

Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive

Sean Whitton writes: > The concrete question that I am asking the committee to decide, in my > capacity as a Policy delegate, is whether or not vendor-specific patch > series should be permitted in the Debian archive. While I am no longer a member of the TC, and my analysis of the situation

Bug#908553: can't reproduce

tags 908553 +unreproducible severity 908553 normal thanks I've been unable to reproduce this problem, and am in fact a nearly-daily user of pcb-rnd. If the problem is persistent for you, I'm going to need to know more about your system config, how you're invoking pcb-rnd, etc, to be able to

Bug#901952: anyone want to craft a patch?

tags 901952 +help thanks I question whether this bug is really release-critical, since the only cases of it I've heard about so far are the two instances pointed to in this bug log where pristine-tar is being used across distributions and versions... I've not seen the behavior in any of my own

Bug#915484: openrocket is an installer that must move to contrib

Adrian Bunk writes: > Package: openrocket > Version: 13.05.1 > Severity: serious > > openrocket was turned into an installer that downloads > the actual softare during package installation. > > In this state it mustn't be in main. Oops, you're right. Working on it now. Bdale signature.asc

Bug#914469: sudo: Truncated sudo(8) man page

Sven Joachim writes: > This has also been reported upstream today. A fix is at > https://www.sudo.ws/repos/sudo/rev/7ddfb74781a1. Thanks. I'll have an updated package uploaded shortly. Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#914677: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#914677: libmawk fails it's tests on s390x

Matthias Klose writes: > libmawk fails it's tests on s390x (also different failures on some non-release > architectures). Thanks, I've let upstream know. Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#901952: can affect packaged with old source tarballs

Hans-Christoph Steiner writes: > this also goes the other way, where tarballs created in tar 1.30 fail to > work in pristine-tar when tar 1.29 is installed: Unfortunately, the nature of pristine-tar is such that it's somewhat brittle in the face of upstream changes to tar. I don't think it's

Bug#901636: mandoc: "mandoc -mdoc -T man" causes memory dump

Bjarni Ingi Gislason writes: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 03:22:03AM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote: >> Bjarni Ingi Gislason writes: >> >> > Output from "mandoc -mdoc -T man groff_mdoc.7": >> >> Where is "groff_mdoc.7" from? I have no su

Bug#924301: error isn't about space in filesystem

The complaint is not about a lack of space inside the filesystem, the complaint is about a lack of unallocated space in the volume group. I suspect a large number of users are now seeing this message from cron, as I am, because they have a volume group where all blocks are allocated. I think

Bug#924301: error isn't about space in filesystem

"Theodore Ts'o" writes: > If you'd like to apply this patch to /sbin/e2scrub_all and confirm > whether or not this fixes things for you, I'd appreciate any feedback. Applied the patch, ran the cron entry command line by hand, and got zero output. Thanks! Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP

Bug#924131: host the scanned printout of the Debian creation announcement in Debian server

Laura Arjona Reina writes: > I suggest to download a copy and host it in a Debian > server (could be www.debian.org or other that you see it better) and > then change the link to point to the resource in our server. > > What do you think? It sounds like a great idea! Bdale signature.asc

Bug#885195: guile-2.2 fix in lepton-eda

The lepton-eda package is a fork of geda-gaf, and is what I'm personally using and focusing my package maintenance efforts on now. A patch for guile-2.2 support provided by lepton-eda upstream is now part of the Debian package version 1.9.7-2. That patch may illuminate the changes required to

Bug#921123: RM: altos [ppc64el] -- RoM; arch-specific Java problem

Package: ftp.debian.org Please remove ppc64el packages of altos from the repository. There appears to be a non-package-specific Java compiler problem on that architecture that will prevent promotion of the latest altos version to testing even once other blockers are cleared. Bdale

Bug#921269: RM: cc1111 -- RoM; obsolete and no longer needed

Package: ftp.debian.org Please remove the cc package from unstable and testing. This is a fork of sdcc that was necessary for a while to be able to build altos, but it's no longer needed and I don't want to maintain it through the buster lifecycle and beyond. Regards, Bdale signature.asc

Bug#927261: tar: file capabilities lost upon extraction

Brian Murray writes: > That being said I started a discussion about having to use > '--xattrs-include=*' when extracting a tar archive with upstream[1] Thanks for working on this with upstream! Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#932795: How to handle FTBFS bugs in release architectures

Santiago Vila writes: > Even if we ever wanted to allow packages to "need" more than one CPU > for building, I'd like to believe that we would do so by introducing a > new control field for that, say, Build-CPU, instead of making > multi-core mandatory for all packages. I agree. Bdale

Bug#944135: laptop audio not working

Package: linux-image-5.2.0-3-amd64 Version: 5.2.17-1+b1 The audio on my Lenovo T490 doesn't work at all with this kernel package. Dropping back to linux-image-5.3.0-1-amd64 resolves the problem. 00:1f.3 Audio device: Intel Corporation Cannon Point-LP High Definition Audio Controller (rev 30)

Bug#944136: laptop audio not working

Package: linux-image-5.3.0-1-amd64 Version: 5.3.7-1 The audio on my Lenovo T490 doesn't work at all with this kernel package. Dropping back to linux-image-5.2.0-3-amd64 resolves the problem. 00:1f.3 Audio device: Intel Corporation Cannon Point-LP High Definition Audio Controller (rev 30) Is

Bug#943413: sudo 1.8.28p1-1 built with wrong libexecdir

tags 943313 +pending thanks Dominick Grift writes: > Package: sudo > Version: 1.8.28p1-1 > > The --libexecdir=/usr/lib/sudo entries in debian/rules are wrong > > It should be --libexecdir=/usr/lib The word "wrong" might be a bit strong, but I agree that losing the extra directory level makes

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >