On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 05:40:47 +0200 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote:
Am 29.03.2015 um 05:31 schrieb Michael Gilbert:
control: severity -1 important
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Gianluca Oglietti wrote:
If the problem is the kernel, can you suggest me a way to debug
this issue?
.
I'm not sure if --re-add is supposed to work in this scenario, however
--stop and --assemble worked fine.
Thank you for your help!
/ C
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 8:07 AM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2015 11:22:47 +0200 Christoffer Hammarström
christoffer.hammarst
Yes, i'm sorry, i thoughtlessly ran
mdadm --stop /dev/md/storage
before reporting the bug.
I managed to reassemble the raid later with --assemble.
/ C
Package: mdadm
Version: 3.3.2-5
Severity: normal
I was trying to re-add some disks to a RAID, and mdadm crashed with a
segmentation fault.
So i rebuilt mdadm with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip and backtraced the core dump
in gdb, which yielded the following output:
# gdb mdadm core
GNU gdb (Debian
it is useful to have the Windows Steam client side by side with
the Linux Steam client.
Kind regards,
/ Christoffer Hammarström
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Xprt off.
Can you confirm this causality?
D'oh! You're (of course) perfectly correct!
I've now reinstated xprint, and i still have my 8192 ulimit.
I feel really stupid now. I'm honestly terribly sorry for wasting so
much of your time on this matter.
Many thanks for your patience.
Christoffer
Package: xprint
Version: 1:0.1.0.alpha1-13
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
/etc/init.d/xprint sets ulimit -n 1024.
This makes other programs break with too many open files, but more
importantly,
i can't set a higher ulimit in bash:
$ ulimit -n 8192
-bash: ulimit:
/security/limits.conf
are ignored.
It sets both the hard and the soft limit (it should be enough to set the
soft limit, right?) without first checking if the hard and the soft
limit are not set higher already.
Thank you for your attention.
Christoffer Hammarström
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Drew Parsons wrote:
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 14:57 +0100, Christoffer Hammarström wrote:
Can you
really run ulimit -n 8192 after having removed xprint?
Yes, i can. This is because i've added the following lines to
/etc/security/limits.conf:
*softnofile 8192
without superuser rights, since ulimit -n
1024 sets the *hard* limit as well as the soft limit.
Thank you for your attention,
Christoffer Hammarström
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Joey Hess wrote:
Also, it's quite possible that this is an amd64 specific problem,
so I also suggest you try running the i386 version on your machine.
It's apparently a 64 bit problem. It's bug 252 in the uqm bugzilla:
http://uqm.stack.nl/cgi-bin/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=252
signature.asc
Package: uqm
Version: 0.3-3
Severity: important
Segfaults on startup with the following output:
The Ur-Quan Masters v0.3 (compiled Apr 11 2005 02:28:09)
This software comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY;
for details see the included 'COPYING' file.
Saved games are kept in
12 matches
Mail list logo
