Bug#489007: confirming: ttf-liberation: Ugly bold u and normal y (sans serif)

I can confirm this. The only difference is that i am using Gnome. Best regards, Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#469189: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686: confirming bug #469189 with QSI DVDRW SDW-042

Subject: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686: confirming bug #469189 with QSI DVDRW SDW-042 Followup-For: Bug #469189 Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686 Version: 2.6.24-4 hi, i can confirm this bug on my Fujitsu Siemens Amilo A-7600 with the drive QSI DVDRW SDW-042. However, when i add vga=788 to the boot

Bug#468735: splashy-fix applicable to usplash as well?

A similar bug in splashy has been recently fixed, see: bug #486400 Is the fix related to a possible fix in usplash? regards, Dan signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Bug#494195: Server did not properly shut down TLS connection

Hello, as pointed out in the links of the bug opener, this is a _security_ issue. Therefore I suggest raising the severity from normal to RC. Best regards, Da signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Bug#505270: confirm

Am Freitag, den 02.01.2009, 15:10 +1300 schrieb Jochen: I can confirm this bug on 2 of my systems. However for me the /etc/directfbrc does not fix the error. Cheers Jochen I can confirm this bug as well, even with 0.3.13-1 the error persists. The /etc/directfbrc hack doesn't work for

Bug#505270: Clarification needed.

Am Sonntag, den 04.01.2009, 17:46 + schrieb Neil Williams: Package: splashy tag 505270 + unreproducible tag 505270 + moreinfo thanks This bug appears to only affect non-standard kernels not using initramfs *and* using /usr on a different partition. wrong. My configuration:

Bug#529618: network-manager-vpnc: Support for vpnc+OpenSSL

Hi! The latest vpnc packages uploaded to sid support hybrid auth out-of-the-box (using GnuTLS libs). network-manager-vpnc should be patched accordingly. Greetings, Dan signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Bug#685069: Please package Shibboleth 2.5 for experimental

Package: shibboleth-sp2 Severity: wishlist Tags: experimental Hi there, with Shibboleth 2.5 just released and wheezy in freeze state, I would like to request packaging of version 2.5 for experimental. I know that this has already been announced on pkg-shibboleth-devel [0], so this report just

Bug#820885: prosody-modules: please also include by default those modules, that are tagged as stable by upstream

Package: prosody-modules Version: 0.0~hg20150813.12ac88940fe3-2 Severity: wishlist I really appreciate the current selection of modules, but I think it should by default be expanded with at least those modules, that are tagged as 'stable' by upstream. The current list can be seen here:

Bug#793387:

Hi Antonio, > > can we still expect an update for stable that fixes this? > > we could, but I need help as I explained earlier in this bug report. unfortunatly I am not quite sure about the specifics of the help needed. Do you mean testing the packages in your repo at

Bug#793387:

Hi Antonio, > The help I need is > > 1) confirmation that this does still happen with the packages in jessie yes, I can confirm that this still happens with the packages in jessie. > 2) identifying exactly which commit on the upstream source, between 2.5 > and 3.0, fixes it. It seems the fix

Bug#793387:

Hi, can we still expect an update for stable that fixes this? Or do we have to wait for a backport of the version in stretch (if that is in any way feasible)? Kind regards, Dan

Bug#835974: prosody-modules: add mod_privilege (XEP-0356)

> Because this module needs a patched prosody 0.9, it does not > make sense to add it to Debian before prosody 0.10 is released > and packaged. Actually, the patch was already backported to prosody 0.9, see: https://hg.prosody.im/0.9/rev/ef22c17cc24d So it has already been part of prosody since

Bug#835974: prosody-modules: add mod_privilege (XEP-0356)

> Because this module needs a patched prosody 0.9, it does not > make sense to add it to Debian before prosody 0.10 is released > and packaged. Actually, the patch was already backported to prosody 0.9, see: https://hg.prosody.im/0.9/rev/ef22c17cc24d So it has already been part of prosody since

Bug#842962: Please provide a stable backport

Victor, thank you! Will you also upload 0.9.11 to jessie-backports, once it hits testing? Best wishes, Dan smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Bug#842963: Please provide 0.10 (future) in experimental

On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 18:19:04 +0100 Victor Seva wrote: > On 11/02/2016 05:47 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > Package: prosody > > Version: 0.9.10-1 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > https://hg.prosody.im/0.10 contains the next planned release of > > prosody. It would be nice to

Bug#842963: Please provide 0.10 (future) in experimental

Hi Matthew, > With my upstream hat on, I'd prefer not having package name collisions > with our upstream repository. Our repository provides automated > nightly builds, and when people install 'prosody-0.10' that's what > they believe they are getting. > > A prosody-0.10 package in Debian would

Bug#847566: RFP: libolm -- An implementation of the Double Ratchet cryptographic ratchet written in C and C++11 and exposed as a C API

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: libolm Version : 2.0.0 Upstream Author : Richard van der Hoff * URL : https://matrix.org/git/olm/ * License : ASL 2.0 Programming Lang: C, C++11 Description : An implementation of the

Bug#835086: RFP: nextcloud -- self-hosted cloud services

Hi all, On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:33:35 +0200 Axel Beckert wrote: > > Do I read that right, the chances for nextCloud in Debian are rather > low while the chances to get ownCloud back in Debian raised due to the > obnoxious upstream developers left together with nextCloud fork and

Bug#850674: prosody-modules: please update to latest upstream changeset

Package: prosody-modules Version: 0.0~hg20160813.65d9093525ca+dfsg-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream Dear Maintainer, please consider updating prosody-modules to the latest upstream changeset as there have been some fixes and additions in the modules that you provide in your package, e.g.

Bug#869591: prosody-modules: remove mod_carbons (provided by prosody 0.10+)

Package: prosody-modules Version: 0.0~hg20170719.cd828b1cb5b9+dfsg Severity: normal prosody-modules is currently packaged with mod_carbons (within the folder /usr/lib/prosody/modules/mod_carbons). Prosody 0.10 comes already shipped with mod_carbons. This didn't lead yet to upgrading file

Bug#883191: prosody-modules: Please add mod_csi_battery_saver

Package: prosody-modules Version: 0.0~hg20170929.c53cc1ae4788+dfsg-3 Severity: wishlist Hi! mod_csi_battery_saver offers a more comprehensive featureset than mod_throttle_presence and mod_filter_chatstates with timestamping, properly handled carbon copies, support for handling encrypted messages

Bug#879685: prosody: Please provide a stable backport of prosody 0.10

Package: prosody Version: 0.10.0-1 Severity: wishlist It would be great if stretch would receive a backport of prosody 0.10 from testing :) -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.2 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64

Bug#877962: prosody: fails to upgrade from 'sid' - trying to overwrite /usr/lib/prosody/modules/mod_mam/fallback_archive.lib.lua

Hi, > From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): > >   Preparing to unpack .../prosody_0.10~hg745e0a783055-3_amd64.deb ... >   invoke-rc.d: could not determine current runlevel >   invoke-rc.d: policy-rc.d denied execution of stop. >   Unpacking prosody (0.10~hg745e0a783055-3) over

Bug#888768: prosody-modules: Please add mod_auth_ldap

Package: prosody-modules Version: 0.0~hg20170929.c53cc1ae4788+dfsg-3 Severity: wishlist Hi! At the moment only mod_auth_ldap2 is included in the package but development of mod_auth_ldap has been more active recently and actually has a larger featureset than mod_auth_ldap2, e.g. the possibility

Bug#914530: fixed in lua-ldap 1.2.3-1

Hi Victor, I can confirm that the patch works! mod_auth_ldap gets loaded and users can authenticate, but only if the option ldap_server consists of a single hostname or IP. A space separated list of hostnames/IPs doesn't work anymore. Using a space separated list of e.g. three hostnames leads to

Bug#847613: Use code from PPA for initial package

I'd really love to have this package in buster.  But this means that it must be in testing before 2019-02-12. So not much time left. The package doesn't have to be in perfect shape by then but afterwards the soft freeze will be active! Kind regards, Dan smime.p7s Description: S/MIME

Bug#814218: lua-ldap: Add support for Lua 5.2

Hi Martin, On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 14:24:52 +0100 "W. Martin Borgert" wrote: > any progress in finding a new or the right upstream? the more or less official looking successor repo on LuaRocks seems to be: https://luarocks.org/modules/devurandom/lualdap Which points to:

Bug#914530: fixed in lua-ldap 1.2.3-1

Thank you Victor, for uploading the new version of lua-ldap! On my test system I upgraded prosody and lua-ldap to the new version in  backports. Unfortunately, mod_auth_ldap doesn't work anymore: Dec 19 17:58:17 modulemanager   error   Error initializing module 'auth_ldap' on '': Attempt to set

Bug#914530: fixed in lua-ldap 1.2.3-1

Hi Martin, > I don't know anything about Lua, but I forwarded your comment to > the prosody MUC thank you. > and the wise people there suggest to remove > three lines from the lua-ldap sources: > > --- a/src/lualdap.c > +++ b/src/lualdap.c > @@ -1090,9 +1090,6 @@ int luaopen_lualdap

Bug#901948: [libsignal-protocol-c] New version of library is available

Hi Martin, am I right in assuming that this issue is blocking the updating of newer dino-im releases after this commit? https://github.com/dino/dino/commit/7012023d5997287b1ed300e03a4c5b91eb6c9c39 An update of libsignal-protocol-c before the buster freeze would be highly appreciated. Kind

Bug#959972: nextcloud-desktop: Please provide a backport for buster

Package: nextcloud-desktop Version: 2.5.1-3+deb10u1 Severity: wishlist It would be nice to let users of buster enjoy the improvements since 2.6 Thank you and kind regards, Dan -- System Information: Debian Release: 10.3 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500,

Bug#945527: cachefilesd: if statement nr_in_(ready|build)_table underflow causes segfault

Dear Maintainer, are you willing to accept this patch? @Dan: Is your patch or at least the bug itself reported to upstream? Thank you and kind regards, Daniel smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Bug#1050256: autopkgtest fails on debci

Hello everyone, On Thu, 2023-08-31 at 08:55 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > > What we found so far is, that the AppArmor policy of lxc breaks any > > systemd service using PrivateNetwork=yes or PrivateIPC=yes when > > being > > run under lxc (running under bookworm using the bookworm kernel).

Bug#995573: Any hope to see a fix coming ?

Hi everyone, > Hi William, > > On  So 22 Mai 2022 22:15:17 CEST, Gacquer William wrote: > > > Hello > > > > A few months later, the bug persists. > > Sadly I can't contribute but I pray every minute for the bug to be > > fixed :) > > > > Best regards > > William Gacquer > > I assume that

Bug#1036981: prosody-modules: please add mod_net_proxy

Package: prosody-modules Version: 0.0~hg20230223.556bf57d6417+dfsg-1~bpo11+1 Severity: wishlist Hello, I would like to propose the inclusion of mod_net_proxy. In case prosody cannot be deployed on a host directly facing the internet, mod_net_proxy comes in very handy and it works very well.

Bug#1038111: haproxy-log-analysis: current version not usable, new upstream release available

Package: haproxy-log-analysis Version: 2.0~b0-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, directly after installation of haproxy-log-analysis the postinst script throws errors: Selecting previously unselected package python3-haproxy-log-analysis. Preparing to

Bug#1035516: php-smbclient broke with samba 4.17.5

Dear maintainers, On Thu, 04 May 2023 16:23:10 +0200 Alan Krempler wrote: > Package: php-smbclient > Version: 1.0.6-8 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > php-smbclient does not work with samba versions 4.17.5 and above: >

Bug#1072272: prosody-modules: please add mod_spam_reporting

Package: prosody-modules Version: 0.0~hg20240511.d3a72777f149+dfsg-1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainers, you have included mod_report_forward and mod_watch_spam_reports in prosody- modules which both depend on mod_spam_reporting but which isn't included in prosody-modules itself yet. So please