Bug#745721: Name collision between libpinyin and libzhuyin (Was: Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1)

[Eriberto]

2014-10-03 9:28 GMT-03:00 ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com:

 Why you did a lintian override to amd64 only?

 The path contains multiarch tuple, so it only works on amd64. I tried to
 build i386 package via pbuilder, and there is no tEH in library. So I
 think it only happens in amd64.


My last question: do you thought in other archs? Do you want keep
[amd64]? (I will accept yes)

Cheers,

Eriberto


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#745721: Name collision between libpinyin and libzhuyin (Was: Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1)

[Eriberto]

New situation: we already have a new Lintian (since yesterday).
Please, update the Standards-Version to 3.9.6.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-10-03 9:36 GMT-03:00 Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br:
 2014-10-03 9:28 GMT-03:00 ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com:

 Why you did a lintian override to amd64 only?

 The path contains multiarch tuple, so it only works on amd64. I tried to
 build i386 package via pbuilder, and there is no tEH in library. So I
 think it only happens in amd64.


 My last question: do you thought in other archs? Do you want keep
 [amd64]? (I will accept yes)

 Cheers,

 Eriberto


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#745721: Name collision between libpinyin and libzhuyin (Was: Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1)

[Eriberto Mota]

Uploaded.

Thanks for your work.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-10-03 11:31 GMT-03:00 ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com:
 On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 09:38:15AM -0300, Eriberto wrote:
 New situation: we already have a new Lintian (since yesterday).
 Please, update the Standards-Version to 3.9.6.

 Just update the Standards-Version to 3.9.6. Looks like nothing need to
 change for 3.9.5 ~ 3.9.6. The package is in mentor [0], please help to
 review and sponsor, thanks.

 [0] https://mentors.debian.net/package/libzhuyin
 --
 ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com
 http://czchen.info/
 Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896  C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#763947: O: dcfldd -- enhanced version of dd for forensics and security

[Joao Eriberto Mota Filho]

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I am orphaning the dcfldd package.

The dcfldd maintainer is MIA and he said, via private email message,
that want leave the package.

I intend to take care of the package. So, I am orphaning it to register
the situation and adopt this package.

Regards,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#745721: Name collision between libpinyin and libzhuyin (Was: Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1)

[Eriberto]

2014-10-01 1:38 GMT-03:00 ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com:

Hi!

 Do you use the tarball from github? The tarball from github does not
 contain data file used by libzhuyin, so upstream suggested using tarball
 from sourceforge [1].


Yes, I used the GitHub because your d/copyright, in Source field,
points to GitHub. You need fix it or add a Comment field to say that
the 0.9.99.20140929 was got from SF.


 3. d/copyright: there are new authors and dates in new upstream code.
 You need to review all files Use 'grep -sriA25 copyright * | less' to
 help you.

 I don't find any new copyright not listed in d/copyright except from
 FSF and X Consortium. Both FSF and X Consortium copyright are in
 autotools generating files, so I think I don't need to list them, right?


You are right. I think that the GitHub code is different. Or a mistake
from me. Sorry.


 The 2002-2006 James Su su...@tsinghua.edu.cn does not present
 anywhere except AUTHORS file, shall I keep it in d/copyright?


Yes. Is clear for me that the original code was developed by James.

I suggest you add an extra line in d/watch to search new versions in
GitHub too. You can use this (or similar):

https://github.com/libzhuyin/libzhuyin/releases
.*/archive/v?(\d\S+)\.tar\.(?:bz2|gz|xz)

Cheers,

Eriberto


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#745721: Name collision between libpinyin and libzhuyin (Was: Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1)

[Eriberto]

Do you removed V=1 from d/rules? Why?

Please, review my last mail saying about blhc and test the command to
you understand the issue. Try to learn, not execute a command only.

Why you did a lintian override to amd64 only?


2014-10-01 12:53 GMT-03:00 ChangZhuo Chen czc...@gmail.com:
 Hi,

 Just upload a new version in mentor [0] with the following update:

 - Fix debhelper version to = 9
 - Add lintian-overrides for force positive spelling-error-in-binary
 - Use hardening=+all
 - Update Source field in d/copyright to sourceforge
 - Add github release to d/watch

 Please help to review and sponsor, thanks.

 [0] https://mentors.debian.net/package/libzhuyin

 --
 ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com
 http://czchen.info/
 Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896  C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

[Eriberto]

Please, be carefull with your work.

I'm wasting time by asking the same things always.

You don't fixed the Vcs-Git yet. I already asked it for you several times.

You pasted the information about copyright without check the files
(dates, names, email addresses).

You didn't use the right formatting when put the new information in d/copyright.

I checked file by file for you (it is your obligation, not mine),
searching the correct information about copyright and you dumped these
information in d/copyright without any care.

Eriberto



2014-09-30 4:52 GMT-03:00 Shawn Sörbom sh...@sorbom.com:
 Hi Eriberto,
 Sorry there had been a problem with my local git repo erlier this evening. As
 a result, the lintian-overrides file was from one of the previous uploads.
 I have fixed it now.
 Thanks,
 --Shawn

 On Monday, September 29, 2014 17:18:49 Eriberto wrote:
 Hi Shawn,

 In d/control, your Vcs-Git still pointing to an invalid address.

 In d/copyright:

- helper/kcm_ufw_helper.py.cmake has copyright by Craig Drummond
 and Darwin M. Bautista.
- helper/helper.h and helper/helper.cpp are licensed under GPL 2+.
- po/es.po has '2011 Kubuntu-es.org' as author. (see the header and
 Last-Translator line)
- po/lt.po: the copyright year is 2011 only.
- add po/fr.po. 2011 Sergio Guibert and Kubuntu-fr.org.

 About the excessive lines at end of files, you removed the final LF/CR
 in all files. You must press ENTER one time in each final line. So,
 the cursor will appear under the first character of the each last
 line.

 These are the last changes to upload the package. I will wait for you.

 Cheers,

 Eriberto


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#745721: Name collision between libpinyin and libzhuyin (Was: Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1)

[Eriberto]

Hi ChangZhuo,

1. I found several differences between your orig.tar.gz and the
tarball in upstream site. I used the diff command to compare. Can you
check this?

2. d/control: please, change the DH level from 9.0.0 to 9.

3. d/copyright: there are new authors and dates in new upstream code.
You need to review all files Use 'grep -sriA25 copyright * | less' to
help you.

4. You have a Lintian message:

I: libzhuyin6: spelling-error-in-binary
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libzhuyin.so.6.0.0 tEH the

Please, create a lintian override and put a comment about this false positive.

5. After the build, I used the command 'blhc --all
libzhuyin_0.9.99.20140929-1_amd64.build' to see about the build
status. No data. So, I used 'export V=1' in debia/rules and blhc show
me several issues. To fix all issues, please, add to d/rules:

export V = 1
export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-30 10:56 GMT-03:00 ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com:
 On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 08:35:35AM -0300, Eriberto wrote:
 Hi ChangZhuo,

 Good news. I will wait for you. You're welcome.

 Upstream released a new version 0.9.99.20140929, and it does not install
 binary tools and its manpage. So we don't need to decide whether
 including binary tools or not anymore.

 I just repacked the package in [0], The only change beside package
 version is using `dh_install --fail-missing` to prevent missing files
 from install. Please help to review and sponsor it, thanks.

 [0] https://mentors.debian.net/package/libzhuyin

 --
 ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com
 http://czchen.info/
 Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896  C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

[Eriberto]

Hi Shawn,

In d/control, your Vcs-Git still pointing to an invalid address.

In d/copyright:

   - helper/kcm_ufw_helper.py.cmake has copyright by Craig Drummond
and Darwin M. Bautista.
   - helper/helper.h and helper/helper.cpp are licensed under GPL 2+.
   - po/es.po has '2011 Kubuntu-es.org' as author. (see the header and
Last-Translator line)
   - po/lt.po: the copyright year is 2011 only.
   - add po/fr.po. 2011 Sergio Guibert and Kubuntu-fr.org.

About the excessive lines at end of files, you removed the final LF/CR
in all files. You must press ENTER one time in each final line. So,
the cursor will appear under the first character of the each last
line.

These are the last changes to upload the package. I will wait for you.

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#751609: RFS: dmaths/3.5.2.5+dfsg1-1 (new version of a package that is already in Debian)

[Eriberto]

Hi Innocent,

2014-09-28 6:07 GMT-03:00 Innocent De Marchi tangram.pe...@gmail.com:

  2. d/control:
  - Explain me why the package depends of writer and draw to work.
 
 
  Has no sense to install the package without these two programs. I don't
  know
  if I understand the question...


 You put in long description It also allows you to use your favorite
 drawing software and include graphs of functions into a document. So,
 why install draw compulsorily as dependency? I am trying understand
 the package. If using writer, will you need of the draw?


 Dmaths is work with Writer and Draw. It does not depend on the two, but some
 of them must be installed.
 Perhaps you could do depend on the LibreOffice metapackage.


The solution: 'libreoffice-writer | libreoffice-draw'. The
libreoffice-common can be removed because libreoffice-writer and
libreoffice-draw already depend of the libreoffice-common.


  - Please, create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can
  use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to
  d/control.
 
 
  I want to do this with all my packages, but now I have no time. I don't
  practice with Git and will need some time for me to update.


 You can use SVN or CVS (or GIT). Sorry but it is an essential
 condition for me. GitHub is simple and has several tutorials and
 videos on Internet.


 Yes, I understand it, but at this moment I have no time to document to do
 this. Perhaps I can do in a few months


No problems. I will wait for you. I have a control to know about the
reviewing stage of the packages.


  5. After the build, there are two wrong independent license files in
  the package:
 
  usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/DmathsAddon/Fichiers/licence.odt
  usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/DmathsAddon/Fichiers/license.txt
 
  You must add an override_dh_install to d/rules to remove these files ($
  man dh):
 
  override_dh_install:
  dh_install
  rm -f
 
  $(CURDIR)/debian/libreoffice-dmaths/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/DmathsAddon/Fichiers/licence.odt
  rm -f
 
  $(CURDIR)/debian/libreoffice-dmaths/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/DmathsAddon/Fichiers/license.txt
 
 
  The dmaths has a menu with an option to see the file
  DmathsAddon/Fichiers/licence.odt
  If it is deleted, an error occurs when accessing the file. I've added a
  line
  to delete the file license.txt to repackage the sources
  (see README.source)


 Ok. Please, add comments line in libreoffice-dmaths.lintian-overrides
 to explain each issue. I think you will need two lines.


 Ok. I will add this comment:
 #The licence.odt file is essential for dmaths: dmaths is broken without the
 file.
 #Image files can not be installed in another directory: dmaths does not
 support changes.


Ok, add these comments (I didn't see comments in current package).


I saw several Lintian messages in your last upload. A new Lintian was
uploaded today to unstable. May it can help you too:
http://eriberto.pro.br/blog/?p=1289

 Yes,  I had not updated the pbuilder environment. I have fully reviewed the
 messages.

 Today I updated the package:
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmaths/dmaths_3.5.2.5+dfsg1-1.dsc

  I hope that everything is correct!
 Thank you very much for your help!


You are welcome. I am glad for help you.

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#752116: RFS: drmips/1.2.2-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

Hi Bruno,

We have a little issue yet. I d/copyright:

Files: src/pc/DrMIPS/src/com/jtattoo/plaf/BaseInternalFrameTitlePane.java
   src/pc/DrMIPS/src/com/jtattoo/plaf/BaseTabbedPaneUI.java
   src/pc/DrMIPS/src/com/jtattoo/plaf/BaseTitlePane.java
Copyright: 2003 Sun Microsystems, Inc.
License: GPL-2.0+

You must list Sun and Software-Entwicklung too because both have
copyright rights.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-26 16:42 GMT-03:00 Bruno Nova brunomb.n...@gmail.com:
 I just found and fixed a small error in the .desktop file, so I uploaded a
 new package.

 And the upstream changelog is indeed detected in Debian. But you still
 should check it.

 2014-09-26 19:50 GMT+01:00 Bruno Nova brunomb.n...@gmail.com:

 I uploaded a new package to Mentors (also updated the source tarball).
 I think I fixed all issues/suggestions.

  src/pc/DrMIPS/src/com/jtattoo/* was copyrighted in 2002, not 2012.
  Please, use '2002 and later', not '2012+'. I suggest the original text
  '2002 and later by MH Software-Entwicklung'.

 Thank you! Don't know how I failed that.

  5.d/links: I didn't understand your intend with this file.
 
  I added a patch to the package to install the PDF manuals to
  /usr/share/doc/drmips/manuals, and used the debian/links file to create
  a
  link from /usr/share/drmips/doc to /usr/share/doc/drmips/manuals (this
  is
  acceptable, right?).
 
 
 Ok, I understand your concern but it is unusual. All packages put
  their docs in /usr/share/doc/. I suggest to remove this link. But I
  won't impose this.

 I changed to source code of the simulator. Now, if the ./doc folder
 doesn't exist, it opens the folder where make install installs the manuals
 to (if it exists).
 So, debian/links and the patch were removed, and this issue is solved.
 (Should have done this earlier)

  Ok!
 
  You can remove the d/docs files because upstream changelog will be
  automaticaly detected by DebHelper.

 That's interesting. I compiled the package in Ubuntu, and the upstream
 changelog was not detected automatically.
 It seems dh_installchangelogs was changed in Ubuntu to not install the
 upstream changelog:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/637176
 I still removed the debian/docs file. Please check if the upstream
 changelog is detected in Debian. I didn't have the time to test this in
 Debian yet.

 --
 Bruno Nova




 --
 Bruno Nova


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#752116: RFS: drmips/1.2.2-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto Mota]

Hi Bruno,

Uploaded! Thanks for your work (as packager and as upstream).

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-27 8:27 GMT-03:00 Bruno Nova brunomb.n...@gmail.com:
 Oops, you're right. I should list both there.
 I just uploaded a new package to Mentors. The issue should be fixed.

 2014-09-27 12:05 GMT+01:00 Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br:

 Hi Bruno,

 We have a little issue yet. I d/copyright:

 Files: src/pc/DrMIPS/src/com/jtattoo/plaf/BaseInternalFrameTitlePane.java
src/pc/DrMIPS/src/com/jtattoo/plaf/BaseTabbedPaneUI.java
src/pc/DrMIPS/src/com/jtattoo/plaf/BaseTitlePane.java
 Copyright: 2003 Sun Microsystems, Inc.
 License: GPL-2.0+

 You must list Sun and Software-Entwicklung too because both have
 copyright rights.

 Cheers,

 Eriberto


 2014-09-26 16:42 GMT-03:00 Bruno Nova brunomb.n...@gmail.com:
  I just found and fixed a small error in the .desktop file, so I uploaded
  a
  new package.
 
  And the upstream changelog is indeed detected in Debian. But you still
  should check it.
 
  2014-09-26 19:50 GMT+01:00 Bruno Nova brunomb.n...@gmail.com:
 
  I uploaded a new package to Mentors (also updated the source tarball).
  I think I fixed all issues/suggestions.
 
   src/pc/DrMIPS/src/com/jtattoo/* was copyrighted in 2002, not 2012.
   Please, use '2002 and later', not '2012+'. I suggest the original
   text
   '2002 and later by MH Software-Entwicklung'.
 
  Thank you! Don't know how I failed that.
 
   5.d/links: I didn't understand your intend with this file.
  
   I added a patch to the package to install the PDF manuals to
   /usr/share/doc/drmips/manuals, and used the debian/links file to
   create
   a
   link from /usr/share/drmips/doc to /usr/share/doc/drmips/manuals
   (this
   is
   acceptable, right?).
  
  
  Ok, I understand your concern but it is unusual. All packages put
   their docs in /usr/share/doc/. I suggest to remove this link. But I
   won't impose this.
 
  I changed to source code of the simulator. Now, if the ./doc folder
  doesn't exist, it opens the folder where make install installs the
  manuals
  to (if it exists).
  So, debian/links and the patch were removed, and this issue is solved.
  (Should have done this earlier)
 
   Ok!
  
   You can remove the d/docs files because upstream changelog will be
   automaticaly detected by DebHelper.
 
  That's interesting. I compiled the package in Ubuntu, and the upstream
  changelog was not detected automatically.
  It seems dh_installchangelogs was changed in Ubuntu to not install the
  upstream changelog:
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/637176
  I still removed the debian/docs file. Please check if the upstream
  changelog is detected in Debian. I didn't have the time to test this in
  Debian yet.
 
  --
  Bruno Nova
 
 
 
 
  --
  Bruno Nova




 --
 Bruno Nova


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#763017: Remove: python3-pyelliptic

[Eriberto]

Thanks Scott for your help. Considering your guidance, I already
uploaded the package for Riley.

Regards,

Eriberto


2014-09-27 11:04 GMT-03:00 Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com:
 On Saturday, September 27, 2014 17:12:46 Riley Baird wrote:
 Package: ftp.debian.org
 Priority: normal

 The package python3-pyelliptic needs to be removed. It will be
 reuploaded soon, but as a binary created by the source package
 'pyelliptic'. This is necessary such that a Python 2 version can be
 created without making duplicates of code already in the archive.

 You don't need to wait for this removal to be done to upload the new package.
 It will just take over the binary name.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

[Eriberto]

Hi Shawn,

You need do some adjustments in your package. Please:

1. d/changelog: rewrite this file, refering to the last version only.
You can see an example here[1].

[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.en.html#changelog

2. d/control:
 - Your Vcs-* points to a empty repository.
 - The Vcs-Git has an invalid address.
 - In long description, change the last semicolon (in list) by a dot.

3. d/copyright:
 - You need inspect each file to find the individual authors and
licenses. You can use -  egrep -sriA25 '(copyright|public domain)' *
- to do it.
 - I saw several files licensed as GPL-2+.
 - You can see an example here[2].

[2] 
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/e/ext4magic/unstable_copyright

4. d/lintian-overrides: the correct comment must be about the symlink
refers to a package dependency.

5. d/patches/fix_about_dialogue.diff: do you sent this patch to
upstream? You can fix the upstream years too...

6. Do you have a Lintian message: kcm-ufw:
copyright-refers-to-symlink-license usr/share/common-licenses/GFDL.

7. Please, remove all excessive blank lines from end of files. Use
'tail -n1 *' to see these lines.

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

[Eriberto]

2014-09-27 21:31 GMT-03:00 Shawn Sörbom sh...@sorbom.com:
 Hi Eriberto,

Hi,

 Regarding your list:
 1. I don't understand whats wrong here. I checked another changelog just to be
 sure:
 http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/e/e3/unstable_changelog
 My entries are all associated with the same upstream version.
 I changed all unstable references to UNRELEASED
 What else am I doing wrong?


This is your first upload of the package. You need to use a -1
revision. You needn't describe each change in first upload because it
is unreleased and haven't a difference from a previous version.


 6. The reference to a symlink was deliberate. The license associated with
 those files was a bit ambiguous. I did not realize this would cause a lintian
 error, as it did not show up when I ran checks on my machine.
 I use the command `lintian -IE` to run checks. Is this error considered bad?


Please, use the GFDL-1.2 to solve the problem. It isn't an ideal
situation because the upstream should have declared the version to be
used. But we have a copyright notice and you need list all authors. Is
wrong to use a generical symlink. See here:

https://lintian.debian.org/tags/copyright-refers-to-symlink-license.html


 7. Fixed in /debian directory, should I apply a patch to the rest of the
 source tree as well?


No. The upstream code must be left intact.


 Should I upload what I've got so far? I thought it might be best to wait until
 all these points are cleared up.


You can upload now. Thanks.

Eriberto


 On Saturday, September 27, 2014 16:57:18 Eriberto wrote:
 Hi Shawn,

 You need do some adjustments in your package. Please:

 1. d/changelog: rewrite this file, refering to the last version only.
 You can see an example here[1].

 [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.en.html#changelog

 2. d/control:
  - Your Vcs-* points to a empty repository.
  - The Vcs-Git has an invalid address.
  - In long description, change the last semicolon (in list) by a dot.

 3. d/copyright:
  - You need inspect each file to find the individual authors and
 licenses. You can use -  egrep -sriA25 '(copyright|public domain)' *
 - to do it.
  - I saw several files licensed as GPL-2+.
  - You can see an example here[2].

 [2]
 http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/e/ext4magic/unstable_
 copyright

 4. d/lintian-overrides: the correct comment must be about the symlink
 refers to a package dependency.

 5. d/patches/fix_about_dialogue.diff: do you sent this patch to
 upstream? You can fix the upstream years too...

 6. Do you have a Lintian message: kcm-ufw:
 copyright-refers-to-symlink-license usr/share/common-licenses/GFDL.

 7. Please, remove all excessive blank lines from end of files. Use
 'tail -n1 *' to see these lines.

 Cheers,

 Eriberto


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#763029: RFS: cligh-0.2 console Github manipulation tool

[Eriberto]

tags 763029 moreinfo
thanks


Hi Dmitry.

About your package, please:

1. d/changelog: rewrite this file, refering to the 0.2-1 version only
and describing it as 'initial release'. Put the ITP number. You can
see an example here[1].

[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.en.html#changelog

2. Use DH 9 instead level 7.

3. In d/control create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can
use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to
d/control. You can see an example here[2].

[2] 
http://sources.debian.net/src/yowsup/0.0~git20140314.938cf1-1/debian/control/

4. d/copyright: you should use the DEP5[3] format to write the license
paragraphs. You must inspect each file to see the authors and used
licenses. Use the command 'egrep -sriA25 '(public domain|copyright)'
*' to help you. You can see an example here[4].

[3] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/#paragraphs
[4] 
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/e/ext4magic/unstable_copyright

5. d/rules:
- Please, remove the useless comments.
- I suggest to remove all override_dh_installman target and create
a file d/manpages. More information in '$ man dh_installman'.

6. Please, provide a d/watch file. Details here[5].

[5] http://eriberto.pro.br/blog/?p=1459

7. You have these messages:

pyversions: missing X(S)-Python-Version in control file, fall back to
debian/pyversions
pyversions: missing debian/pyversions file, fall back to supported versions

More information here[6].

[6] 
https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-module_packages.html

Thanks for your work.

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#762464: Aw: Bug#762464: RFS: fyba/4.1.1-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto Mota]

Hi Steffen,

I was sponsoring this package and I pointed some issues to be fixed.
But, now, considering that the package was uploaded, I am closing this
bug.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-25 13:48 GMT-03:00 Steffen Möller steffen_moel...@gmx.de:
 Hello,

 I just built something lintian-clean from mentors and feel like sponsoring 
 fyba.
 My only desire would be some page on wiki.debian.org that gives us an idea
 about how to used it :)

 Cheers,

 Steffen

 Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. September 2014 um 03:06 Uhr
 Von: Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org
 An: Ruben Undheim ruben.undh...@gmail.com, 762...@bugs.debian.org
 Cc: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org, Control Bugs Debian 
 cont...@bugs.debian.org
 Betreff: Bug#762464: RFS: fyba/4.1.1-1 [ITP]

 tags 762464 moreinfo
 thanks


 Hi again Ruben,

 About your package, please:

 1. d/control:
   - Change DH level from 9.0.0 to 9.

 2. You have Lintian messages:

 I: libfyba0: no-symbols-control-file 
 usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfygm.so.0.0.0
 I: libfyba0: no-symbols-control-file 
 usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfyut.so.0.0.0
 I: libfyba0: no-symbols-control-file 
 usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfyba.so.0.0.0

 After the debuild command you need generate symbols[1] using this
 command in upstream place:

 dpkg-gensymbols -v4.1.1 -plibfyba0 -Odebian/libfyba0.symbols

 [1] 
 https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html#s-providing-symbols

 3. The blhc command show some issues:

 blhc --all fyba_4.1.1-1_amd64.build

 To fix it, in d/rules, change from

 export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wl,--as-needed

 to

 export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all

 You can see details here[2].

 [2] https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening#dpkg-buildflags

 Thanks a lot for your work.

 Cheers,

 Eriberto



 2014-09-22 12:52 GMT-03:00 Ruben Undheim ruben.undh...@gmail.com:
  Package: sponsorship-requests
  Severity: wishlist
 
Dear mentors,
 
I am looking for a sponsor for my package fyba
 
   * Package name: fyba
 Version : 4.1.1-1
 Upstream Author : Statens Kartverk
   * URL : https://github.com/kartverket/fyba
   * License : MIT
 Section : libs
 
It builds those binary packages:
 
  libfyba-dev - Header files for FYBA library
  libfyba0   - FYBA library to read and write norwegian geodata
  standard format
  libfyba0-dbg - debug symbols for libfyba0
 
To access further information about this package, please visit the
  following URL:
 
http://mentors.debian.net/package/fyba
 
Alternatively, one can checkout the packaging repo from git using
  this command:
 
 git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-grass/fyba.git
 
 or download the package with dget using this command:
 
  dget -x 
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fyba/fyba_4.1.1-1.dsc
 
 
Changes since the last upload:
 
 Initial release (Closes: #760544)
 
 
Regards,
 Ruben Undheim
 
 
  --
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
  with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact 
  listmas...@lists.debian.org
  Archive: 
  https://lists.debian.org/CA+ChNyXRGM4pTrXBH3x9388KkjnUiPM=x=ovfa2vxsmn7xq...@mail.gmail.com
 


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: 
 https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjetuy21z4p881wyjxvo9sw40eqhbz5qp_gspxssd7-...@mail.gmail.com




 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: 
 https://lists.debian.org/trinity-e930ebb2-0f6c-406d-a81c-976a480e21b4-1411663699839@3capp-gmx-bs08



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#758715: RFS: bgfinancas/2.0-1 [ITP]‏

[Eriberto Mota]

Hi José,

I think that is all right now. Uploaded to Debian. Thanks a lot for
your work (as upstream and packager).

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-24 16:01 GMT-03:00 José Robson Mariano Alves binarygr...@hotmail.com:
 Hi Eriberto, i finally found the error.
 Only happens on the first run of the program, and only if you choose a
 language contrary to standard.

 The tutorial helped a lot, thanks.

 The package is in: http://mentors.debian.net/package/bgfinancas
 DSC:
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bgfinancas/bgfinancas_2.0-1.dsc

 Thanks for all.

 Regards,
 José Robson Mariano Alves


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#752116: RFS: drmips/1.2.2-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

HI Bruno,

2014-09-23 11:38 GMT-03:00 Bruno Nova brunomb.n...@gmail.com:
 I went through all suggestions.
 Since I made some changes to the upstream code, as suggested, I released a
 new version of the source tarball (1.2.3).
 The extension of the tarball is now tar.xz, for higher compression.
 I also uploaded a new package to Mentors with all the changes.
 Since the version was changed, the new path to the dsc is:
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/drmips/drmips_1.2.3-1.dsc

 I think I fixed all issues/suggestions.
 Some important remarks follows.

 1. Change the DH level from 8 to 9.

 I changed debian/compat to 9.
 I also updated the debhelper build-dependency on debian/control to (=
 9.0.0). Is that correct?


Please, change from 9.0.0 to 9.


 2. d/control: (...)

 I changed the section to 'java'.


Ok!

I forgot to ask you to break the Build-Depends line. You can see two
different examples here[1][2].

[1] http://sources.debian.net/src/ext4magic/0.3.2-1/debian/control
[2] http://sources.debian.net/src/core-network/4.7-1/debian/control


 3. d/copyright: (...)

 I think I'm listing all copyrights now, and I'm using the license texts in
 /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/licenses/. But it needs to be checked.
 The BSD-3-Clause that I used needs to be checked (more specifically, the
 copyright holder in the 3rd clause).


In this case you should to use 'author'. Not that 'copyright holder'
is wrong. But I always see 'author'.


 Also, in src/pc/DrMIPS/src/com/jtattoo/plaf, there are three files
 (BaseTabbedPaneUI.java, BaseTitlePane.java and
 BaseInternalFrameTitlePane.java) that have this comment above the JTattoo
 license (by MH Software-Entwicklung):
 /*
  * Copyright 2003 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
  * SUN PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL. Use is subject to license terms.
  */
 This looks strange. Is this a problem? What should I do about this?
 Note: these files are new. They were added to fix issue/suggestion 7
 (explained below).


Ok, strange. My interpretation: when Sun modified this file in 2003,
Sun agreed with previous license (2002). How the Sun didn't write
more, so the original license is valid. You need to add '2003 Sun
Microsystems, Inc.' for these files in d/copyright.

src/pc/DrMIPS/src/com/jtattoo/* was copyrighted in 2002, not 2012.
Please, use '2002 and later', not '2012+'. I suggest the original text
'2002 and later by MH Software-Entwicklung'.


 5.d/links: I didn't understand your intend with this file.

 I added a patch to the package to install the PDF manuals to
 /usr/share/doc/drmips/manuals, and used the debian/links file to create a
 link from /usr/share/drmips/doc to /usr/share/doc/drmips/manuals (this is
 acceptable, right?).


Ok, I understand your concern but it is unusual. All packages put
their docs in /usr/share/doc/. I suggest to remove this link. But I
won't impose this.


 I also added two doc-base control files, as suggested by lintian.

Ok.


 7. After build we have some Lintian messages that you can solve (as
 packager and as upstream):

 a. Maybe you can solve:

 P: drmips source: source-contains-prebuilt-java-
 object
 src/android/DrMIPS/libs/android-support-v4.jar
 P: drmips source: source-contains-prebuilt-java-object
 src/pc/DrMIPS/lib/JTattoo.jar
 P: drmips source: source-contains-prebuilt-java-object
 src/pc/DrMIPS/lib/autocomplete.jar
 P: drmips source: source-contains-prebuilt-java-object
 src/pc/DrMIPS/lib/rsyntaxtextarea.jar

 The first library was not really being used, so it was removed. (Even if it
 had not been removed, it was not being used by this package).
 The others were replaced by their source code.

Ok!

You can remove the d/docs files because upstream changelog will be
automaticaly detected by DebHelper.

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#752116: RFS: drmips/1.2.2-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto Mota]

2014-09-23 11:52 GMT-03:00 Bruno Nova brunomb.n...@gmail.com:
 I forgot something about copyrights.

 JTattoo is multiple licensed, but only GPLv2 and v3 can be used for free,
 it's necessary to pay to use the other licenses. Do I list those licenses as
 well in debian/copyright?


No. In this case you must put the used license.


 Most files in cmake/Modules/ contained only a pointer to the full copyright
 text, and asked to replace that by the full license in Copyright.txt if
 distributed outside of CMake, which I did in the upstream source code.
 However, I don't know what to do to the Copyright ... lines. Leave them
 intact (what I did), merge them with the Copyright lines from the
 Copyright.txt, or replace them?


Leave the original copyright line. Here I understood that this file
was made by an external author (from KDE) only.

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#762464: RFS: fyba/4.1.1-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto Mota]

tags 762464 moreinfo
thanks


Hi again Ruben,

About your package, please:

1. d/control:
  - Change DH level from 9.0.0 to 9.

2. You have Lintian messages:

I: libfyba0: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfygm.so.0.0.0
I: libfyba0: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfyut.so.0.0.0
I: libfyba0: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfyba.so.0.0.0

After the debuild command you need generate symbols[1] using this
command in upstream place:

dpkg-gensymbols -v4.1.1 -plibfyba0 -Odebian/libfyba0.symbols

[1] 
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html#s-providing-symbols

3. The blhc command show some issues:

blhc --all fyba_4.1.1-1_amd64.build

To fix it, in d/rules, change from

export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wl,--as-needed

to

export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all

You can see details here[2].

[2] https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening#dpkg-buildflags

Thanks a lot for your work.

Cheers,

Eriberto



2014-09-22 12:52 GMT-03:00 Ruben Undheim ruben.undh...@gmail.com:
 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: wishlist

   Dear mentors,

   I am looking for a sponsor for my package fyba

  * Package name: fyba
Version : 4.1.1-1
Upstream Author : Statens Kartverk
  * URL : https://github.com/kartverket/fyba
  * License : MIT
Section : libs

   It builds those binary packages:

 libfyba-dev - Header files for FYBA library
 libfyba0   - FYBA library to read and write norwegian geodata
 standard format
 libfyba0-dbg - debug symbols for libfyba0

   To access further information about this package, please visit the
 following URL:

   http://mentors.debian.net/package/fyba

   Alternatively, one can checkout the packaging repo from git using
 this command:

git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-grass/fyba.git

or download the package with dget using this command:

 dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fyba/fyba_4.1.1-1.dsc


   Changes since the last upload:

Initial release (Closes: #760544)


   Regards,
Ruben Undheim


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: 
 https://lists.debian.org/CA+ChNyXRGM4pTrXBH3x9388KkjnUiPM=x=ovfa2vxsmn7xq...@mail.gmail.com



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#762451: O: solfege

[Eriberto]

Hi Ana,

Sorry and thanks!

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-23 5:49 GMT-03:00 Ana Guerrero Lopez a...@debian.org:
 retitle 762451 O: solfege -- Ear training software
 Hi Joao,

 Thank you for being faster than the MIA team doing this :)
 I'm fixing the bug title.

 Ana

 On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:32:17AM -0300, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote:
 Package: wnpp
 Severity: normal

 The current maintainer of solfege, Tom Cato Amundsen t...@debian.org,
 has retired.  Therefore, I orphan this package now.

 Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
 package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.

 If you want to be the new maintainer, please see
 http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed
 instructions how to adopt a package properly.

 Some information about this package:

 Package: solfege
 Binary: solfege, solfege-doc, solfege-oss
 Version: 3.22.2-2
 Maintainer: Tom Cato Amundsen t...@debian.org
 Build-Depends: quilt (= 0.46-7~), debhelper (= 7.0.50~), autotools-dev, 
 swig, gettext, python-dev (= 2.6.6-3~), texinfo, python-gtk2 (= 2.12.0), 
 python-gtk2-dev (= 2.12.0), librsvg2-bin, txt2man, pkg-config, 
 libglib2.0-dev (= 2.8.0), xauth, xfonts-base, libxml2-utils, gnome-doc-utils
 Architecture: any all
 Standards-Version: 3.9.1
 Format: 3.0 (quilt)
 Files:
  e25aa8ad3c129e3c49f4c724c66c3b18 1406 solfege_3.22.2-2.dsc
  ee9778d2b960b7afb375c5b3c3878222 6890977 solfege_3.22.2.orig.tar.gz
  32de67fbd9470807851a986ca16595b9 9030 solfege_3.22.2-2.debian.tar.gz
 Checksums-Sha1:
  72ca4209507411412ee9fe04eb2216e370ae727a 1406 solfege_3.22.2-2.dsc
  c197e04ca2e028e84238c63bcf1f6777bb513044 6890977 solfege_3.22.2.orig.tar.gz
  e797e03b6d11ec29d081ef0ed5c786e6a820d050 9030 solfege_3.22.2-2.debian.tar.gz
 Checksums-Sha256:
  f94aa30513447d8616040de7c730c7e779238d8e2a6e3a2e31d12b07cd56d9a3 1406 
 solfege_3.22.2-2.dsc
  e46a0960c83e4998d9dcf7bb07b8269e03fc81fab6c4485f8112c5a3e6488fe4 6890977 
 solfege_3.22.2.orig.tar.gz
  5dca09e03ce44e68a2193a2678241318c583a753849cbb033aa54fd6488bcf8a 9030 
 solfege_3.22.2-2.debian.tar.gz
 Homepage: http://www.solfege.org
 Package-List:
  solfege deb gnome optional
  solfege-doc deb doc optional
  solfege-oss deb gnome optional
 Directory: pool/main/s/solfege
 Priority: source
 Section: gnome

 Package: solfege
 Version: 3.22.2-2
 Installed-Size: 6695
 Maintainer: Tom Cato Amundsen t...@debian.org
 Architecture: all
 Depends: python (= 2.6.6-3~), python-gtk2 (= 2.12), timidity, freepats
 Recommends: csound, python-pyalsa
 Description-en: Ear training software
  GNU Solfege is an ear training program for X Window written in Python,
  using the GTK+ 2.0 libraries. You can practice harmonic and
  melodic intervals, chords, scales and rhythms, and you can add new
  exercises using a simple plain text file format.
  .
  Ear training is a big subject with many connections to music theory
  and performance of music, so I won't even try to make a complete
  computer-based ear training course. But I hope someone find this
  software useful.
 Description-md5: 13eb3158e7d9ca2fd1dd389ef6110a85
 Homepage: http://www.solfege.org
 Tag: field::arts, implemented-in::python, interface::x11, role::program,
  suite::gnu, uitoolkit::gtk, use::learning, works-with::audio,
  x11::application
 Section: gnome
 Priority: optional
 Filename: pool/main/s/solfege/solfege_3.22.2-2_all.deb
 Size: 1873028
 MD5sum: 8bf20a2a4cdc0f34f8ff6cbc99320611
 SHA1: d3b3760a8feed83943a475a0b1557ab0782b90bc
 SHA256: b65b8f9ffe90ddbf21e2ac4db9cd7de18bba60c5fb98d05275610a4260aa3dee

 Thanks to Tom for your work when maintainer of this package.

 Regards,

 Eriberto


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#752116: RFS: drmips/1.2.2-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

2014-09-23 8:40 GMT-03:00 Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net:

 I don't think that the package will be rejected; here's the commit that
 added the education section to the Debian Policy:

 http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/dbnpolicy/policy.git/commit/?id=c316cdbc5878da6eed332d5e07043bef3dd6a138

 It contains a reference to an e-mail from Joerg Jaspert (on behalf of
 the FTP Masters team) that notes that the education section has been
 added to the Debian archive:

 https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/12/msg00051.html

 So it seems to me that it is a valid section, it seems that the website
 is lagging behind a bit.

Peter,

I have a bit afraid but your arguments are very good. So, Bruno, I
think that you can use education.

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#762451: O: solfege

[Joao Eriberto Mota Filho]

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

The current maintainer of solfege, Tom Cato Amundsen t...@debian.org,
has retired.  Therefore, I orphan this package now.

Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.

If you want to be the new maintainer, please see
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed
instructions how to adopt a package properly.

Some information about this package:

Package: solfege
Binary: solfege, solfege-doc, solfege-oss
Version: 3.22.2-2
Maintainer: Tom Cato Amundsen t...@debian.org
Build-Depends: quilt (= 0.46-7~), debhelper (= 7.0.50~), autotools-dev, swig, 
gettext, python-dev (= 2.6.6-3~), texinfo, python-gtk2 (= 2.12.0), 
python-gtk2-dev (= 2.12.0), librsvg2-bin, txt2man, pkg-config, libglib2.0-dev 
(= 2.8.0), xauth, xfonts-base, libxml2-utils, gnome-doc-utils
Architecture: any all
Standards-Version: 3.9.1
Format: 3.0 (quilt)
Files:
 e25aa8ad3c129e3c49f4c724c66c3b18 1406 solfege_3.22.2-2.dsc
 ee9778d2b960b7afb375c5b3c3878222 6890977 solfege_3.22.2.orig.tar.gz
 32de67fbd9470807851a986ca16595b9 9030 solfege_3.22.2-2.debian.tar.gz
Checksums-Sha1:
 72ca4209507411412ee9fe04eb2216e370ae727a 1406 solfege_3.22.2-2.dsc
 c197e04ca2e028e84238c63bcf1f6777bb513044 6890977 solfege_3.22.2.orig.tar.gz
 e797e03b6d11ec29d081ef0ed5c786e6a820d050 9030 solfege_3.22.2-2.debian.tar.gz
Checksums-Sha256:
 f94aa30513447d8616040de7c730c7e779238d8e2a6e3a2e31d12b07cd56d9a3 1406 
solfege_3.22.2-2.dsc
 e46a0960c83e4998d9dcf7bb07b8269e03fc81fab6c4485f8112c5a3e6488fe4 6890977 
solfege_3.22.2.orig.tar.gz
 5dca09e03ce44e68a2193a2678241318c583a753849cbb033aa54fd6488bcf8a 9030 
solfege_3.22.2-2.debian.tar.gz
Homepage: http://www.solfege.org
Package-List: 
 solfege deb gnome optional
 solfege-doc deb doc optional
 solfege-oss deb gnome optional
Directory: pool/main/s/solfege
Priority: source
Section: gnome

Package: solfege
Version: 3.22.2-2
Installed-Size: 6695
Maintainer: Tom Cato Amundsen t...@debian.org
Architecture: all
Depends: python (= 2.6.6-3~), python-gtk2 (= 2.12), timidity, freepats
Recommends: csound, python-pyalsa
Description-en: Ear training software
 GNU Solfege is an ear training program for X Window written in Python,
 using the GTK+ 2.0 libraries. You can practice harmonic and
 melodic intervals, chords, scales and rhythms, and you can add new
 exercises using a simple plain text file format.
 .
 Ear training is a big subject with many connections to music theory
 and performance of music, so I won't even try to make a complete
 computer-based ear training course. But I hope someone find this
 software useful.
Description-md5: 13eb3158e7d9ca2fd1dd389ef6110a85
Homepage: http://www.solfege.org
Tag: field::arts, implemented-in::python, interface::x11, role::program,
 suite::gnu, uitoolkit::gtk, use::learning, works-with::audio,
 x11::application
Section: gnome
Priority: optional
Filename: pool/main/s/solfege/solfege_3.22.2-2_all.deb
Size: 1873028
MD5sum: 8bf20a2a4cdc0f34f8ff6cbc99320611
SHA1: d3b3760a8feed83943a475a0b1557ab0782b90bc
SHA256: b65b8f9ffe90ddbf21e2ac4db9cd7de18bba60c5fb98d05275610a4260aa3dee

Thanks to Tom for your work when maintainer of this package.

Regards,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys

[Eriberto Mota]

Hi Martin,

2014-09-22 7:19 GMT-03:00 Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de:
 Am Mittwoch, 17. September 2014, 17:47:29 schrieb Eriberto:
 Hi Martin,

 Hello Eriberto,

 About your package, please:

 1. Use DH 9 instead DH 8.


You didn't make your package full compatible with DH9 yet. So, edit
the d/compat file and change from 8 to 9. In d/control, change from
9.0.0 to 9.


 3. d/copyright:
 - In header, the field 'Source' is wrong.
 - The 'AUTHORS' file says: 'Licensed unter GPL-2. See COPYING.'.
 So, the upstream code is GPL-2, not 2+. Note the word 'unter'. :-)
 - Your year as packager should be 2013.

 What do you mean by that? I already have

 Files: debian/*
 Copyright: 2013-2014 Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de
 License: GPL-3+

 Anything else needed?


Sorry for my mistake. As the package in new in Debian, the packaging
year must be 2014.


 4. d/rules: please, remove all comments (from '# -*- makefile' up to
 'verbose mode').


Please, do it.


 5. You will need update the Homepage address. Can your current
 homepage allow scans from d/watch file?

 Did those and re-uploaded.


Please, in d/watch, change from 'tags' to 'releases'. It will allow
that uscan command can make download of the new releases.


 Found my mistake with previous upload, I misordered arguments to dput like in
 dput -f mentors distkeys_1.0-1_amd64.changes and this uploaded to ftp-
 master. I asked ftp masters to discard this. Might be good if dput catches
 this argument misordering, I think I will file a wishlist bug about it.


Not needed. You can upload anything to Debian queue. If your package
is not signed by a DD or DM GPG key, it will be automatically dropped.

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#758715: RFS: bgfinancas/2.0-1 [ITP]‏

[Eriberto]

Hi José. How are you?

Well, the english version is ok. However, now, when in Portuguese
profile, several words are in english.

Do you didn't generate a new upstream number version?

You have a lintian message to solve:

I: bgfinancas: desktop-entry-lacks-keywords-entry
usr/share/applications/bgfinancas.desktop

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-22 11:54 GMT-03:00 José Robson Mariano Alves binarygr...@hotmail.com:

 Hi Eriberto, i made the last changes.
 It took a time, because i was without internet at home.

 The package is in: http://mentors.debian.net/package/bgfinancas
 DSC:
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bgfinancas/bgfinancas_2.0-1.dsc

 I not found the error of language, but i made small changes in the language
 files, I hope the problem has been solved.

 Thanks for all.

 Regards,
 José Robson Mariano Alves


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys

[Eriberto]

2014-09-22 13:52 GMT-03:00 Andrey Rahmatullin w...@debian.org:
 On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:52:55AM -0300, Eriberto Mota wrote:
  - Your year as packager should be 2013.
 
  What do you mean by that? I already have
 
  Files: debian/*
  Copyright: 2013-2014 Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de
  License: GPL-3+
 
  Anything else needed?


 Sorry for my mistake. As the package in new in Debian, the packaging
 year must be 2014.
 This is wrong.

 --
 WBR, wRAR


Andrey,

Not wrong. The package is in first upload. 2014.

Please, don't interfer in my revision without a strong motive.

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

[Eriberto]

2014-09-22 4:21 GMT-03:00 Shawn Sörbom sh...@sorbom.com:
 Hi Eriberto

Hi!

 I was unable to find the broken symlink that lintian was complaining about.


Ok. I checked it now and is all right.

Your package depends of the kdelibs-bin, that depends of the other
packages. One these packages install the directory that will be
linked. You can see it installing the kdelibs-bin. So, please, add a
lintian override with a comment to these messages.


 I also haven't uploaded yet because I haven't fixed the spelling error in
 source files. I will fix these and upload as soon as I can (I am still reading
 about proper quilt usage). All other errors are fixed.


No problem. I can wait. About quilt, if you have a problem in
'Makefile', you can do:

quilt new fix_makefile
quilt add Makefile
edit the Makefile
quilt refresh
quilt header -e
edit the header[1]
quilt pop -a

Please, read about new, add, refresh, header and pop.

[1] A example of the header:

Description: fix the Examples path and countries.csv place.
Author: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho eribe...@debian.org
Last-Update: 2014-07-01


 Also, would it be possible for me to use alioth for this kind of project? I am
 having trouble setting up git via automated tools on github.
 According to replies I got on deb-mentors, git doesn't have cmdline access
 needed for the tools to be used. I was wary of setting up an account on Alioth
 because I wasn't sure if kcm-ufw qualified.
 If it does, I would much prefer using Alioth.


You can use Alioth, but the reply to request can take a bit. You can
use an external git, request the access and migrate your repository.

Cheers,

Eriberto


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#758715: RFS: bgfinancas/2.0-1 [ITP]‏

[Eriberto]

Hi,

I use a personalized jail. How you are Brazilian, you can see about
this here[1].

Cheers,

Eriberto

[1] http://eriberto.pro.br/debian/guia_empacotamento_debian_2.7.pdf


2014-09-22 13:24 GMT-03:00 José Robson Mariano Alves binarygr...@hotmail.com:
 What program did you use to compile? i did use pbuilder.

 You run the program in a chroot environment? I'm running out, I did not see
 how.

 I could not reproduce the problem of language.

 I have to generate a new upstream version number? even as the first package?

 If you can point me to some documentation for the program you use and how
 you execute the compiled software I appreciate it.

 Regards,
 José Robson Mariano Alves



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#759557: RFS: asic0x/1.0.1-1 [ITP] -- iBurst USB modem driver in DKMS format

[Eriberto Mota]

Hi Graham,

Uploaded. Thanks a lot for your (very good) work.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-21 7:04 GMT-03:00 Graham Inggs gra...@nerve.org.za:
 Hi Eriberto

 Thanks for taking the time to review my package.

 On 21 September 2014 06:11, Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org wrote:
 1. d/control: in asic0x-dkms (binary), add dkms as dependency.

 This is already taken care of by substvars:
 misc:Depends=dkms (= 2.1.0.0)

 2. d/copyright: use the GPL-2+ license text provided by Debian
 templates. You can find it here:
 /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/licenses/gpl2.

 Updated, thanks.

 3. d/rules: remove the comment line started with 'Uncomment...'.

 I removed this line and the 'export DH_VERBOSE=1' line.

 4. Please, upload your final package to mentors.debian.net.

 Uploaded:

 http://mentors.debian.net/package/asic0x

 Regards
 Graham


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#752116: RFS: drmips/1.2.2-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto Mota]

Hi Bruno,

2014-09-21 7:35 GMT-03:00 Bruno Nova brunomb.n...@gmail.com:
 Hmm, this is an interesting point.  The education section was added by
 the FTP Masters back in 2012, and grep-dctrl -FSection education seems
 to show me at least 128 binary packages matching that (e.g. gcompris,
 kanadic, scratch, etc).  See the list of sections in Debian Policy 2.4;
 it seems that the webpage needs to be updated.

 I also thought 'education' was a valid section: lintian doesn't complain,
 Synaptic shows a friendly name translated to my language for that section,
 vim doesn't mark it in red, and Ubuntu has some packages in that section.
 And the Debian Policy mentions that section indeed.
 Should I leave it in 'education', or should I change it? Maybe to 'java', or
 'electronics' which is also a good choice. It's probably better to change.


Ok. I will let you decide. However, see the cons:

- Your package won't be showed in unstable list[1].
- If your package is rejected, maybe we won't have time to reupload
before the Jessie freezy.

[1] https://packages.debian.org/unstable

I think that more important that the section is the word 'education'
in long description.


 3. d/copyright:
 - You must list all authors and licenses in thos file. Use the
 command 'egrep -sriA25 '(public domain|copyright)' *' to help you.

 I was missing the copyrights for the files in cmake/Modules/, and I think
 that's all.


I don't remember but I will recheck when you upload to mentors.


 By authors you mean the names/emails of the people/companies that appear
 in the copyright notices of the source files, right?


Yes.


 The copyright of cmake/Modules/UseLATEX.cmake caused me some confusion,
 though. But I found a package in Ubuntu (feel++) that uses that file, so it
 should be ok.


My suggestion:

Files: cmake/Modules/UseLATEX.cmake
Copyright: 2004 Sandia Corporation,
by Kenneth Moreland kmo...@sandia.gov
Comment: version 1.10.4
License: Contract_DE-AC04-94AL85000


License: Contract_DE-AC04-94AL85000
 Under the terms of Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000, there is a non-exclusive
 license for use of this work by or on behalf of the U.S. Government.
 .
 Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
 modification, are permitted provided that this Notice and any statement
 of authorship are reproduced on all copies.


- From Debian policy[2]:

 Packages distributed under the Apache license (version 2.0), the
 Artistic license, the GNU GPL (versions 1, 2, or 3), the GNU LGPL
 (versions 2, 2.1, or 3), and the GNU FDL (versions 1.2 or 1.3) should
 refer to the corresponding files under
 /usr/share/common-licenses,[
 119] rather than quoting them in the
 copyright file.

 - I suggest you to use the conventional license texts provided by
 Debian, when applicable. These text are available at
 /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/licenses/.

 But the template texts there for those licenses also include a short
 summary of the licenses, before the pointer to the full text.
 Should I remove that and put only the pointer?


No. The point is use the conventional texts. As an example, see the
differences between /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/licenses/gpl2 and
your text.


 5.d/links: I didn't understand your intend with this file.

 The package installs some PDF manuals to /usr/share/drmips/doc/, and the
 program searches for them in that place (using a relative path).
 The link is just so the manuals are also accessible from /usr/share/doc/,
 the usual place in Linux for documentation.
 Should I remove the link?

It is a bit strange. I suggest change the source code as upstream or
make a patch for CMakeLists.txt to search in standard place.


 Some additional questions:
 * Should the Priority in debian/control be 'optional' or 'extra'?

Optional. From Debian Policy: extra: This contains all packages that
conflict with others with required, important, standard or optional
priorities, or are only likely to be useful if you already know what
they are or have specialized requirements (such as packages containing
only detached debugging symbols).

 * Should the urgency in debian/changelog be 'low' or 'medium'? (the default
 was changed recently, I think)

For the first upload (new package) use low.

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#749096: RFS: karlyriceditor/1.11-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto Mota]

Hi Martin!

Thanks for changes. Uploaded.

Cheers,

Eriberto

2014-09-20 8:58 GMT-03:00 Martin Steghöfer mar...@steghoefer.eu:
 Hi Eriberto,

 Thank you for your time and attention!

 I've uploaded a new version to git and mentors that incorporates your
 suggested changes:
  * https://github.com/martin-steghoefer/debian-karlyriceditor
  * http://mentors.debian.net/package/karlyriceditor


 Eriberto Mota wrote:

 1. Update the package to use DH 9, instead DH 8.


 Done in
 https://github.com/martin-steghoefer/debian-karlyriceditor/commit/e2aa0ed5

 2. d/control:
  - Change priority from extra to optional.


 Done in
 https://github.com/martin-steghoefer/debian-karlyriceditor/commit/296f209d

  - Break the Build-Depends in some lines to make visualization easier.


 Done in
 https://github.com/martin-steghoefer/debian-karlyriceditor/commit/b0949627

 4. d/rules:
  - Remove the initial useless comments [...].


 Done in
 https://github.com/martin-steghoefer/debian-karlyriceditor/commit/9416a63c

  - Change the four export lines (CPPFLAGS, CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS and
 LDFLAGS) to 'export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all'. You can
 check the results using the command 'blhc --all
 karlyriceditor_1.11-1_amd64.build'


 Nice trick, thanks! Not only did this make the debian/rules file more
 readable, but it also added some extra hardening flags that were not
 included before. I hadn't checked the hardening with blhc before, only with
 lintian - and it seems that lintian only checks for some basic hardening
 flags (probably because it is designed to only check the pure package, but
 not the build log that may not always be available).

 Done in
 https://github.com/martin-steghoefer/debian-karlyriceditor/commit/4fdf9268


 Thank you for your review! Anything else I can do to accelerate the sponsor
 search?

 Cheers,
 Martin



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#752116: RFS: drmips/1.2.2-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

Hi Peter,

2014-09-20 21:40 GMT-03:00 Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net:

 - I think that Vsc-Git should be
 'https://bitbucket.org/brunonova/drmips -n debian'.

 Hm, I think you mean -b debian here :)


Yes, you are right. The 'b' is near of the 'n' in keyboard. A typo. Thanks!


 But once again, thanks for all your work on sponsoring Debian packages!

I am glad when helping. Thanks.

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

[Eriberto]

2014-09-20 2:18 GMT-03:00 Shawn Sörbom sh...@sorbom.com:
 Hi Eriberto,


Hi Shawn,


 Sorry this is taking so long. I had a lot of homework this week.


You're welcome.


 I have 2 questions:

 1. If somebody is mentioned in the upstream changelog as having made a
 contribution but does not appear on any copyright notices, do they belong
 anywhere in the debian/copyright folder?


No. You can ignore this.


 2.Once I have a VCS set up, should I still make uploads to
 mentors.debian.net?


Yes, because it is easier for me. Thanks.


 3. I noticed there is docbook documentation associated with the upstream
 project. I forget which utilities I ran to try to convert it, but they all
 crashed. What should I do with it? I didn't even know kcm addons were
 supposed to have man pages.

 3b. What utilities do you recommend in relation to question 3? I have never
 used docbook before.


The files are being installed in package. You can use the commands in
docbook-utils package to convert to html or pdf. I don't know docbook
too. So, you need search about it in Google.

Cheers,

Eriberto


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#759557: RFS: asic0x/1.0.1-1 [ITP] -- iBurst USB modem driver in DKMS format

[Eriberto Mota]

tags 759557 moreinfo
thanks


Hi Graham,

Please:

1. d/control: in asic0x-dkms (binary), add dkms as dependency.

2. d/copyright: use the GPL-2+ license text provided by Debian
templates. You can find it here:
/usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/licenses/gpl2.

3. d/rules: remove the comment line started with 'Uncomment...'.

4. Please, upload your final package to mentors.debian.net.

Thanks for your work.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-08-28 10:22 GMT-03:00 Graham Inggs gra...@nerve.org.za:
 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: wishlist

 Dear mentors

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package asic0x:

 * Package name: asic0x
   Version : 1.0.1
   Upstream Author : Lourens Steyn lourensst...@hotmail.com
 * URL : https://github.com/lourenssteyn/asic0x
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : kernel

 It builds the following binary package:

 asic0x-dkms - iBurst USB modem driver in DKMS format

 My packaging attempt is available here:

 http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/asic0x.git/

 The driver itself cannot be tested without access to a Kyocera iBurst modem,
 but after installing the package, the kernel module should build without
 error
 and should appear in /lib/modules/kernel version/updates/dkms/ as
 asic0x.ko.

 Regards
 Graham


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53ff2d32.8080...@nerve.org.za



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#757966: RFS: lutris/0.3.4-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

Hi Pierre,

You is very very near an upload.

Note that file data/ui/about-dialog.ui is GPL-3+ (not GPL-3). So, you
need to create a section for this file in d/copyright.

Considering that you need to modify the copyright file, I will make a
new request for you. Please, add a reference about you, Debian and
free usage of the manpage. This is important because manpages are
published in several sites (without the source code) and someone might
want to contact you. You can see an example here[1]. (go to the end of
page)

[1] http://sources.debian.net/src/mac-robber/1.02-3/debian/man/mac-robber.1

Please, make these changes and I will upload the package. I will wait for you...

Cheers,

Eriberto

2014-09-19 4:31 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff cont...@rudloff.pro:
 It is on mentors : https://mentors.debian.net/package/lutris

 Regards,

 2014-09-19 1:40 GMT+02:00 Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org:

 Please, upload your package to mentors.d.n. It makes easier the review
 and, maybe final, tests. Thanks.

 Cheers,

 Eriberto

 Em quinta-feira, 18 de setembro de 2014, Pierre Rudloff
 cont...@rudloff.pro escreveu:

 Oh OK, I did not see there was some files by different auhtors in the
 tarball.

 I added them to the copyright file:
 https://github.com/Rudloff/lutris-debian/commit/aa24f3a5b4f865cf9eb00f6746ce199eca0f0147

 Thanks again for your help!

 Regards,

 Le 18/09/2014 01:42, Eriberto a écrit :

 Hi,

 2014-09-17 17:41 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff cont...@rudloff.pro:

 3.
   - I am not sure I understand. It does use the 1.0 format.
   - Where should I list the upstream authors? I don't see a
 field
 for
 this in the 1.0 format.




 You can consult any copyright in Debian packages to see an example.
 You can use these:



 http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/n/netmate/unstable_copyright



 http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/e/ext4magic/unstable_copyright


 I edited the copyright file. Is it OK now?



 The format is right now. However, you must to list all upstream
 authors and licenses in d/copyright. See the second example above
 (ext4magic). You can use this command to help you: 'grep -sriA25
 copyright *'.


 6. I have added a generic README.source about quilt. Is this OK?




 No. My idea was talk about the original debian directory removed from
 upstream code.


 I've added a sentence explaining this. Is this enough? (There is no
 special
 step needed, as dpkg-source -x takes care of replacing the debian
 folder.)


 Yes. Perfect.

 Cheers,

 Eriberto




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#748878: RFS: mwc/1.7.2-1 ITP

[Eriberto Mota]

Hi Jörg,

Thanks a lot for your work. Uploaded.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-19 4:53 GMT-03:00 Jörg Frings-Fürst deb...@jff-webhosting.net:
 Hola Eriberto,


 first many thanks for your review.


 Am Donnerstag, den 18.09.2014, 15:52 -0300 schrieb Eriberto:
 Hi Jörg,

 Thanks for all adjustments. Please:

 - d/changelog: change urgency from medium to low.
 done.

 - d/control:
   - Add a VCS to control your package.

   - I suggest to add the name 'MailWebsiteChanges' in long description.

   - Put a dot in end of the first phrase in long description.
   - Remove ${shlibs:Depends} because interpreted languages doesn't use it.
   - Why you have dh-systemd as build dependency?
 Both removed.

 - d/copyright:
   - The upstream code is GPL-2+, not GPL-2.
   - Where you saw that upstream site is GPL-2?
 My error. I'm looking for at your opinion instead of at your option
 in the LICENSE. And found them not.
 Change to GPL-2+.

 Do you have permission
 to add this content in your package? I suggest to list the site in
 d/README.Debian, not include the site.
 I think you mean the debian/docs. I have got the docu from the upstream
 author with a entry in d/copyright. Removed and I put a short reference
 into d/README.Debian.

 - d/mwc.1: add a reference about you, Debian and free usage of the
 manpage. This is important because manpages are published in several
 sites (without the source code) and someone might want to contact you.
 You can see an example here[1]. (go to the end of page)

 [1] http://sources.debian.net/src/mac-robber/1.02-3/debian/man/mac-robber.1

 Done.

 - d/mwc.cron.hourly: I think that isn't a good idea this file, because
 you are forcing the user machine to connect the Internet without a
 express permission. Ok, a NTP client do it. However, I think that the
 situation is different. Other point is that, initially, will not exist
 an user configuration and the mwc will try connect even so.

 I have moved them from etc/cron.hourly into examples with a tip in
 d/README.Debian.

 d/rules: remove all comments.

 done.

 d/watch: githubredir is deprecated. Please, see here[2] how to make a 
 d/watch.

 [2] http://eriberto.pro.br/blog/?p=1459

 Also done. And uploaded again to mentors[1]

 Thanks for your work.

 Cheers,

 Eriberto

 [...]

 CU
 Jörg


 [1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mwc/mwc_1.7.2-1.dsc

 --
 pgp Fingerprint: 7D13 3C60 0A10 DBE1 51F8  EBCB 422B 44B0 BE58 1B6E
 pgp Key: BE581B6E
 CAcert Key S/N: 0E:D4:56

 Jörg Frings-Fürst
 D-54526 Niederkail

 Threema: SYR8SJXB

 IRC: j_...@freenode.net
  j_...@oftc.net







--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#752116: RFS: drmips/1.2.2-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto Mota]

tags 752116 moreinfo
thanks


Hi Bruno,

Please:

1. Change the DH level from 8 to 9.

2. d/control:
- Debian no have a section 'education'. Please, choose a section
here[1]. Use the contract name of the section. As example, for
miscellaneous, use misc. How to know this? Click over the section and
use the name showed in head.
- I think that Vsc-Git should be
'https://bitbucket.org/brunonova/drmips -n debian'. Could you provide
a Vcs-Browser field?
- Remove ${shlibs:Depends} because interpreted languages don't use it.
- In long description, put a dot between the first and second paragraphs.
- In long description, what is FEUP? Where (country) is FEUP?

[1] https://packages.debian.org/unstable/

3. d/copyright:
- You must list all authors and licenses in thos file. Use the
command 'egrep -sriA25 '(public domain|copyright)' *' to help you.
- From Debian policy[2]:

Packages distributed under the Apache license (version 2.0), the
Artistic license, the GNU GPL (versions 1, 2, or 3), the GNU LGPL
(versions 2, 2.1, or 3), and the GNU FDL (versions 1.2 or 1.3) should
refer to the corresponding files under
/usr/share/common-licenses,[119] rather than quoting them in the
copyright file.

- I suggest you to use the conventional license texts provided by
Debian, when applicable. These text are available at
/usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/licenses/.

[2] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile

4. d/drmips.1: you are the upstream. Why you don't include the manpage
in source tarball? idem to drmips.desktop, drmips.pt.1 and drmips.xpm.

5.d/links: I didn't understand your intend with this file.

6. d/rules: please, remove the trash (from '# -*- makefile' to 'verbose mode').

7. After build we have some Lintian messages that you can solve (as
packager and as upstream):

a. Maybe you can solve:

P: drmips source: source-contains-prebuilt-java-object
src/android/DrMIPS/libs/android-support-v4.jar
P: drmips source: source-contains-prebuilt-java-object
src/pc/DrMIPS/lib/JTattoo.jar
P: drmips source: source-contains-prebuilt-java-object
src/pc/DrMIPS/lib/autocomplete.jar
P: drmips source: source-contains-prebuilt-java-object
src/pc/DrMIPS/lib/rsyntaxtextarea.jar

b. You can solve:

P: drmips source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature
P: drmips: no-upstream-changelog

PS: I would like to suggest you to add a GPG signature for your
upstream code. To see more details, '$ man uscan' (search for
pgpsigurlmangle). To sign your tarball, you can use 'gpg -ab
tarball_name'.

c. You should use a Lintian override (first line must be a comment
about the issue):

I: drmips source: ored-build-depends-on-obsolete-package
build-depends: openjdk-6-jdk
I: drmips: ored-depends-on-obsolete-package depends: openjdk-6-jre

8. Your package doesn't build twice. To fix it, you must create an
override to dh_clean in d/rules (man dh) to remove these files and
directories:

src/android/DrMIPS/libs/DrMIPSSimulator.jar
src/pc/DrMIPS/lib/DrMIPSSimulator.jar
src/android/DrMIPS/res/raw/
src/pc/DrMIPS/cpu/

Thanks for your work.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-06-19 15:22 GMT-03:00 Bruno Nova brunomb.n...@gmail.com:
 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: wishlist

 Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package drmips

 * Package name: drmips
   Version : 1.2.2-1
   Upstream Author : Bruno Nova brunomb.n...@gmail.com
 * URL : https://bitbucket.org/brunonova/drmips/
 * License : GPL
   Section : education

 It builds those binary packages:

   drmips - Educational MIPS simulator - DrMIPS

 To access further information about this package, please visit the following
 URL:

 http://mentors.debian.net/package/drmips


 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

   dget -x
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/drmips/drmips_1.2.2-1.dsc


 Regards,
  Bruno Nova


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys

[Eriberto Mota]

Hi Martin,

2014-09-17 19:01 GMT-03:00 Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de:
 Changed to github already in a re-uploaded distkeys package (dput -f).

Your package in mentors.d.n is old yet. Do you uploaded the newer version?

Don't worry. I will wait you as long as needed.

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#757966: RFS: lutris/0.3.4-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

Hi Andrey and Pierre,

Hum... It is new for me. I tested here with lutris and works fine. In
old years, I would get a warning about changes in upstream code.

Thanks for your help Andrey.

Pierre, sorry for my mistake and waste of time. Please, remove the
README.source.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-18 2:31 GMT-03:00 Andrey Rahmatullin w...@debian.org:
 On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 05:12:54PM -0300, Eriberto wrote:
  6. I have added a generic README.source about quilt. Is this OK?
 No. My idea was talk about the original debian directory removed from
 upstream code.
 The original debian/ is removed by dpkg-source when unpacking 3.0 (quilt)
 packages, please read dpkg-source(1), Format: 3.0 (quilt).
 You should document in README.source only things required to be done
 manually after unpacking the package, see
 https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-readmesource

 --
 WBR, wRAR


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys

[Eriberto Mota]

2014-09-18 9:25 GMT-03:00 Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de:
 I think I did. Maybe I missed something. Will check when I am back at work.

 Thanks for your patience.



You're welcome.

Bye!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#749096: RFS: karlyriceditor/1.11-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto Mota]

tags 749096 moreinfo
thanks


Hi Martin,

I will try help you. Please:

1. Update the package to use DH 9, instead DH 8.

2. d/control:
- Change priority from extra to optional.
- Break the Build-Depends in some lines to make visualization
easier. You can see these different examples:

http://sources.debian.net/src/ext4magic/0.3.2-1/debian/control/
http://sources.debian.net/src/xombrero/2:1.6.3-1/debian/control/

3. d/copyright: a very good copyright file. My congratulations.

4. d/rules:
- Remove the initial useless comments (from '# -*- makefile' to
'verbose mode').
- Change the four export lines (CPPFLAGS, CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS and
LDFLAGS) to 'export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all'. You can
check the results using the command 'blhc --all
karlyriceditor_1.11-1_amd64.build'

Thanks for you work.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-05-23 22:03 GMT-03:00 Martin Steghöfer mar...@steghoefer.eu:
 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: wishlist

   Dear mentors,

   I am looking for a sponsor for my package karlyriceditor

  * Package name: karlyriceditor
Version : 1.11-1
Upstream Author : George Yunaevsupp...@ulduzsoft.com
  * URL :http://www.ulduzsoft.com/linux/karaoke-lyrics-editor/
  * License : GPL-3+
Section : video

   It builds those binary packages:

 karlyriceditor - Karaoke lyrics editor

   To access further information about this package, please visit the
 following URL:

 http://mentors.debian.net/package/karlyriceditor


   Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

 dget
 -xhttp://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/karlyriceditor/karlyriceditor_1.11-1.dsc

   Or download the source package from the git VCS and build it using
 git-buildpackage:

 gbp-clone https://github.com/martin-steghoefer/debian-karlyriceditor.git
 cd debian-karlyriceditor/
 git-buildpackage

   You can also have a look at the package in your browser:

 https://github.com/martin-steghoefer/debian-karlyriceditor

   The package has been reviewed once by the pkg-multimedia-maintainers
 list and the raised problems have been dealt with.

   Best regards,
Martin Steghöfer


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: https://lists.debian.org/537fefd7.3050...@steghoefer.eu



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#748878: RFS: mwc/1.7.2-1 ITP

[Eriberto]

Hi Jörg,

Thanks for all adjustments. Please:

- d/changelog: change urgency from medium to low.

- d/control:
  - Add a VCS to control your package.
  - I suggest to add the name 'MailWebsiteChanges' in long description.
  - Put a dot in end of the first phrase in long description.
  - Remove ${shlibs:Depends} because interpreted languages doesn't use it.
  - Why you have dh-systemd as build dependency?

- d/copyright:
  - The upstream code is GPL-2+, not GPL-2.
  - Where you saw that upstream site is GPL-2? Do you have permission
to add this content in your package? I suggest to list the site in
d/README.Debian, not include the site.

- d/mwc.1: add a reference about you, Debian and free usage of the
manpage. This is important because manpages are published in several
sites (without the source code) and someone might want to contact you.
You can see an example here[1]. (go to the end of page)

[1] http://sources.debian.net/src/mac-robber/1.02-3/debian/man/mac-robber.1

- d/mwc.cron.hourly: I think that isn't a good idea this file, because
you are forcing the user machine to connect the Internet without a
express permission. Ok, a NTP client do it. However, I think that the
situation is different. Other point is that, initially, will not exist
an user configuration and the mwc will try connect even so.

d/rules: remove all comments.

d/watch: githubredir is deprecated. Please, see here[2] how to make a d/watch.

[2] http://eriberto.pro.br/blog/?p=1459

Thanks for your work.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-18 12:00 GMT-03:00 Jörg Frings-Fürst deb...@jff-webhosting.net:
 Hola Eriberto,


 thanks that you will review mwc.

 Sorry for the delay. I have test and change something.

 Am Mittwoch, den 17.09.2014, 18:05 -0300 schrieb Eriberto Mota:
 tags 748878 moreinfo
 thanks


 Hi again Jörg,

 I am ready to review your package. Can you update the package to make
 easier my review?

 My changes:

 - remove preinst with install cssselect
 - add Depend python-cssselect
 - debian/rules:
   use of dh_python3
   rewrite for more debhelper usage
 - debian/copyright
   change upstream license from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2
 - remove useless startscripts



 Cheers,

 Eriberto
 [...]

 CU
 Jörg

 [1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mwc/mwc_1.7.2-1.dsc

 --
 pgp Fingerprint: 7D13 3C60 0A10 DBE1 51F8  EBCB 422B 44B0 BE58 1B6E
 pgp Key: BE581B6E
 CAcert Key S/N: 0E:D4:56

 Jörg Frings-Fürst
 D-54526 Niederkail

 Threema: SYR8SJXB

 IRC: j_...@freenode.net
  j_...@oftc.net







--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#757966: RFS: lutris/0.3.4-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto Mota]

Please, upload your package to mentors.d.n. It makes easier the review and,
maybe final, tests. Thanks.

Cheers,

Eriberto

Em quinta-feira, 18 de setembro de 2014, Pierre Rudloff cont...@rudloff.pro
escreveu:

 Oh OK, I did not see there was some files by different auhtors in the
 tarball.

 I added them to the copyright file: https://github.com/Rudloff/
 lutris-debian/commit/aa24f3a5b4f865cf9eb00f6746ce199eca0f0147

 Thanks again for your help!

 Regards,

 Le 18/09/2014 01:42, Eriberto a écrit :

 Hi,

 2014-09-17 17:41 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff cont...@rudloff.pro:

 3.
   - I am not sure I understand. It does use the 1.0 format.
   - Where should I list the upstream authors? I don't see a
 field
 for
 this in the 1.0 format.




 You can consult any copyright in Debian packages to see an example.
 You can use these:


 http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/n/
 netmate/unstable_copyright


 http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/e/
 ext4magic/unstable_copyright


 I edited the copyright file. Is it OK now?



 The format is right now. However, you must to list all upstream
 authors and licenses in d/copyright. See the second example above
 (ext4magic). You can use this command to help you: 'grep -sriA25
 copyright *'.


  6. I have added a generic README.source about quilt. Is this OK?




 No. My idea was talk about the original debian directory removed from
 upstream code.


 I've added a sentence explaining this. Is this enough? (There is no
 special
 step needed, as dpkg-source -x takes care of replacing the debian
 folder.)


 Yes. Perfect.

 Cheers,

 Eriberto

Bug#757966: RFS: lutris/0.3.4-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

Hi Pierre,

2014-09-16 16:13 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff cont...@rudloff.pro:

 2.
 - Done.


Please, read again my instructions in item 2 in last mail. You didn't
changed the Depends field.


 - My work is now on GitHub: https://github.com/Rudloff/lutris-debian
 GitHub uses the same URL for browser and git clone, you should I still fill
 both fields?


Yes, this is right.


 - You can manually add to your Lutris library any game that can be
 installed on your computer (either natively or with Wine). Do you think the
 description can be misleading?
 - Are you talking about game platforms? I've added a list of those.


Yes, sorry for my mistake.


 3.
 - I am not sure I understand. It does use the 1.0 format.
 - Where should I list the upstream authors? I don't see a field for
 this in the 1.0 format.


You can consult any copyright in Debian packages to see an example.
You can use these:

http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/n/netmate/unstable_copyright

http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/e/ext4magic/unstable_copyright



 5. Lintian was complaining that the package did not include any upstream
 changelog so I added one from the upstream debian directory (oddly, I only
 contained information about the software itself and not the packaging).
 Anyway, I removed it.


Ok. It isn't a problem. This lintian message can be ignored because
you depends of the upstream. However, you can suggest him to add a
license.


 6. I have added a generic README.source about quilt. Is this OK?


No. My idea was talk about the original debian directory removed from
upstream code.

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys

[Eriberto]

Hi Martin,

About your package, please:

1. Use DH 9 instead DH 8.

2. d/control:
- Change Priority from 'extra' to 'optional'.
- The Homepage field and VCS point to a site that says 'The
project you're trying to access has been archived'.

3. d/copyright:
- In header, the field 'Source' is wrong.
- The 'AUTHORS' file says: 'Licensed unter GPL-2. See COPYING.'.
So, the upstream code is GPL-2, not 2+. Note the word 'unter'. :-)
- Your year as packager should be 2013.

4. d/rules: please, remove all comments (from '# -*- makefile' up to
'verbose mode').

5. You will need update the Homepage address. Can your current
homepage allow scans from d/watch file?

Thanks for your work.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-17 6:34 GMT-03:00 Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de:
 tags 712787 -moreinfo
 thanks

 Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2014, 09:07:04 schrieb Eriberto Mota:
 tags 712787 moreinfo
 thanks


 Hi Martin,

 HI Eriberto,


 You didn't put the ITP number in d/changelog.

 Did so now.

 To make easier the review, please, upload your package to
 mentors.debian.net.

 Uploaded to

 http://mentors.debian.net/package/distkeys

 and hanged status to needs a sponsor.

 Thanks,
 Martin

 Thanks,

 Eriberto

 2014-04-22 5:28 GMT-03:00 Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de:
  ITP finally went through after Don added some additional stripping to the
  mail parsing.
 
  ITP: distkeys -- Distkeys - upload SSH keys to servers and more
  http://bugs.debian.org/745478
 
  Thanks,
 ]…}



 --
 Martin Steigerwald  | Consultant / Trainer

 teamix GmbH
 Südwestpark 43
 90449 Nürnberg

 Tel.:  +49 911 30999 55 | Fax: +49 911 30999 99
 mail: martin.steigerw...@teamix.de | web:  http://www.teamix.de | blog: 
 http://blog.teamix.de

 Amtsgericht Nürnberg, HRB 18320 | Geschäftsführer: Oliver Kügow, Richard 
 Müller





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#748878: RFS: mwc/1.7.2-1 ITP

[Eriberto Mota]

tags 748878 moreinfo
thanks


Hi again Jörg,

I am ready to review your package. Can you update the package to make
easier my review?

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-05-21 15:29 GMT-03:00 Jörg Frings-Fürst deb...@jff-webhosting.net:
 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: normal

   Dear mentors,

   I am looking for a sponsor for my package mwc

  * Package name: mwc
Version : 1.7.2-1
Upstream Author : Michael Till Beck debiang...@gmx.de
  * URL : https://github.com/Debianguru/MailWebsiteChanges
  * License : GPL-2.0+, GPL-3.0+
Section : utils

   It builds those binary packages:

 mwc   - Powerful website-tracking tool

   To access further information about this package, please visit the 
 following URL:

   http://mentors.debian.net/package/mwc


   Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

 dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mwc/mwc_1.7.2-1.dsc

   Changes since the last upload:

* Initial release


   Regards,
Jörg Frings-Fürst


 --
 pgp Fingerprint: 7D13 3C60 0A10 DBE1 51F8  EBCB 422B 44B0 BE58 1B6E
 pgp Key: BE581B6E
 CAcert Key S/N: 0E:D4:56

 Jörg Frings-Fürst
 D-54526 Niederkail

 IRC: j_...@freenode.net
  j_...@oftc.net






--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#757966: RFS: lutris/0.3.4-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

Hi,

2014-09-17 17:41 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff cont...@rudloff.pro:
 3.
  - I am not sure I understand. It does use the 1.0 format.
  - Where should I list the upstream authors? I don't see a field
 for
 this in the 1.0 format.



 You can consult any copyright in Debian packages to see an example.
 You can use these:


 http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/n/netmate/unstable_copyright


 http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/e/ext4magic/unstable_copyright

 I edited the copyright file. Is it OK now?


The format is right now. However, you must to list all upstream
authors and licenses in d/copyright. See the second example above
(ext4magic). You can use this command to help you: 'grep -sriA25
copyright *'.


 6. I have added a generic README.source about quilt. Is this OK?



 No. My idea was talk about the original debian directory removed from
 upstream code.

 I've added a sentence explaining this. Is this enough? (There is no special
 step needed, as dpkg-source -x takes care of replacing the debian folder.)

Yes. Perfect.

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#757966: RFS: lutris/0.3.4-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

Hi wRAR,

You need analyze the package to understand my words. Pierre, the
maintainer, already understood and replied me.

Thanks for your help and attention.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-16 0:11 GMT-03:00 Andrey Rahmatullin w...@debian.org:
 On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:22:10PM -0300, Eriberto wrote:
 To put a package in Debian you must remove the debian/ directory from
 upstream source code and generate a new tarball. So, you must start a
 new Debian package. You can use some ideas from upstream, not clone
 the code only.
 I see several wrong statements here. Can you elaborate?

 --
 WBR, wRAR


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#757966: RFS: lutris/0.3.4-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

Hi Pierre,

Thanks for your fast reply. I will try help you.

1. d/changelog: please, use 'Initial release' instead of 'source
package automatically created by stdeb 0.6.0+git'.

2. d/control:
 - Change the Priority from extra to optional[1].
 - The upstream INSTALL file says that you must use Python 2.7.
So, change from 'python ( 2.8), python (= 2.7)' to 'python' in
Build-Depends and remove from Depends. The X-Python-Version field is
used to notify the system about the correct version to be used.
 - The same problem with X-Python-Version. Use 'X-Python-Version:
2.7'. More details here[2].
 - Please, create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can
use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to
d/control. You can see an example here[3].
 - In short description, is right the afirmation 'any video game'?
Is it real?
 - In long description, remove extra spaces in last three lines. I
saw in upstream site (GitHub) a list about some games that can be used
with lutris. To improve your long description and allow more people to
find your package via apt-cache search, I suggest add a list of
possible games.

[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.en.html#control
[2] 
https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-module_packages.html#s-specifying_versions
[3] 
http://sources.debian.net/src/yowsup/0.0~git20140314.938cf1-1/debian/control/

3. d/copyright: you should use the 1.0 format. Please, read this short
document[4] and fix this file.

[4] https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/

Other comment is that you must to list all upstream authors and
licenses in d/copyright.

4. d/lutris.6: I asked: Where I can find the 'info' manual of the
game?, because your manpage says: The full documentation for lutris
is maintained as a Texinfo manual.  If the info and lutris programs
are properly installed at your site, the command 'info lutris' should
give you access to the complete manual.

I would appreciate it if you put an example of installation of the
game in manpage (the complete line command).

5. d/rules:
- Please, remove all comments.
- Why you are installing a changelog from Ubuntu (made by
upstream)? Please, remove it and the file ChangeLog.

6. Add a d/README.source file saying about the changes need in
upstream tarball to generate the package.

Thanks for your work. I will wait your package.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-15 19:52 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff cont...@rudloff.pro:
 Hello,

 Sorry, I thought it was better to reuse an existing package.
 I have rebuilt it from scratch: http://mentors.debian.net/package/lutris

 Here are the answers to your questions:
 1. It does not use it anymore.
 2. I have set it to 9, which seems to be the current level.
 3. It isn't a game but a game manager, so isn't a man page enough?
 4. It has one now.
 5. I think it should be in main, as it complies with the DFSG and does not
 rely on non-free packages.

 Regards,


 Le 15/09/2014 22:22, Eriberto a écrit :

 Hi Pierre,

 I checked your package and you are using/cloning the original upstream
 packaging.

 To put a package in Debian you must remove the debian/ directory from
 upstream source code and generate a new tarball. So, you must start a
 new Debian package. You can use some ideas from upstream, not clone
 the code only.

 I would like you to answer some questions:

 1. Why the package is using CDBS?

 2. What is the current DH level?

 3. Where I can find the 'info' manual of the game?

 4. Why the package hasn't a X-Python-Version field?

 5. Your package must be main, contrib or non-free? Why?

 If your want to put a package in Debian, you must have sufficient
 skill to maintain this package and solve bugs etc. I suggest you look
 at 'Debian New Maintainers' Guide'[1] and, after this, review your
 package. If you have doubts, you can ask for help in Debian Mentors
 List[2].

 I wish a good work for you.

 Cheers,

 Eriberto

 [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/
 [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/

 2014-08-12 17:04 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff cont...@rudloff.pro:



 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: wishlist

 Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package lutris

 * Package name: lutris
   Version : 0.3.4-1
   Upstream Author : Mathieu Comandon stryc...@gmail.com
 * URL : https://lutris.net/
 * License : GPLv3
   Section : games

 It builds those binary packages:

  lutris - Install and play any video game easily

 To access further information about this package, please visit the
 following
 URL:

 http://mentors.debian.net/package/lutris


 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
 command:

  dget -x

 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lutris/lutris_0.3.4-1.dsc

 More information about lutris can be obtained from
 https://lutris.net/.

 Changes since

Bug#761697: DDPO: showing package adopted by third-party as being mine

[Eriberto]

Hi Daniel,

Ok, you are right. I adopted pdfcrack in January and the package is
showed in old maintainer's DDPO[1].

I need to know if is right or not then I will can close the bug.

Cheers,

Eriberto

[1] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=nacho%40debian.org

2014-09-16 13:18 GMT-03:00 Daniel Lintott dan...@serverb.co.uk:

 On 15/09/14 21:41, Daniel Lintott wrote:
 Ah... Now I see... it's being picked up as being co-maintained. At a
 guess this is caused by the change of maintainer causing two email
 address in one of the DDPO databases.

 Okay... I think I've unravelled what is happening here.

 Because you *used* to upload the package (which is still in stable) DDPO
 picks you up as an uploader (highlighted in blue)

 Another example of this can be seen at [1] for the gns3 and dynamips
 packages which I maintain now.

 So the question here is whether a prior maintainer should still see the
 package listed in their DDPO, whilst there name is present on the a
 version of the package that exists in Debian (e.g. in stable)?

 Cheers,

 Daniel

 [1] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=e...@debian.org



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#747169: RFS: socksjs-twisted/1.2.1-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto Mota]

Hi Alexandre,

Sorry for my delay. I was traveling.

2014-09-11 18:09 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Rossi alexandre.ro...@gmail.com:
 Thanks for your time.

- Please, create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can
 use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to
 d/control. You can see an example here[1].

 Done.

 You need use 'git://' to Vcs-Git, intead of 'https://'.

 That's not what recommended by github and https:// works as a git
 clone url. I'm not against changing this though.


Ok. I didn't know it. I tested, using a clone procedure, and it
worked. Thank you for showing me.


 2. d/copyright:
 Please, I found new names as Ariel Flesler and The Dojo Foundation
 (from your patch).

 Okay, I added those names. But doesn't the header of the file give the 
 license?


All relevant license notices must to be put in d/copyright.


 How you concluded that txsockjs/websockets.py is under MIT license? Do
 you checked this information at this site[1]?

 [1] http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/browser/branches/websocket-4173-2?rev=29073

 Yes.

 If yes, the license must be put inside the source code. From MIT
 license: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall
 be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software..
 So, if no have references in source code (about the license and
 origin), the upstream didn't can distribute this code without break
 the licensing rules.

 I am very concerned because I think that the upstream source code has
 several files or extracts of codes from other upstreams without
 licenses. If yes, the socksjs-twisted upstream needs to fix this
 issue.

 You are right. But as upstream does not seem responsive, I cannot do
 much more than patching the files to fix those issues.


The problem, IMHO, is that the software is hurting copyright rights
and can't be distributed. So, I think the upstream must fix it. Other
alternative is you to fork the project and fix all issues. But it is a
bit hard to life.


 3. What makes your patch? My impression is that you are injecting a
 third-part code in upstream. Is this? If yes, you must add it as an
 dependency of the package. If not packaged, you need package it.

 The patch adds the missing source for minified js files. See
 https://lintian.debian.org/tags/source-is-missing.html

 Ok. But the lintian says: add it to debian/missing-sources
 directory. And as I said, this code must be referenced in
 d/copyright.

 My idea was to have a patch ready for inclusion by upstream, easier
 than picking up the pieces in debian/missing-sources.


Ok, but it is an third-party code injected yet. The better procedure
is put it as a dependency.


 What is the origin of this code? (you must add it to the patch header)

 This code was taken from the history of jquery.

 There is this code packaged in Debian?

 Yes but not the same version as the minified source.


Do you tested to see if works? For me, this inclusion, in a first
view, is undesirable. I will baulk to accept it...


 This files are not even part of the binary package, the idea is just
 to fix the source package.


Ok, I understood it. But consider my previous opinion.


 6. Do you see these lintian messages?

 P: sockjs-twisted source: source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object
 qunit/html/static/jquery.min.js
 P: sockjs-twisted source: source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object
 qunit/html/static/qunit.min.js

 Those are fixed by the patch and are false positives, see above and a
 lintian bug :
 https://bugs.debian.org/744972

 I can be wrong. But the pointed site is about missing sources. Please see 
 it[2].

 [2] 
 https://lintian.debian.org/tags/source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object.html

 From some other discussion, I had understood that including the
 missing source was enough. What is your advice here : should I add a
 Makefile to regenerate those files that don't even get in the binary
 package? Should I repack the source to get rid of those (which would
 be a pity : the archived source package would be stripped of its test
 suite) ?

 Alex

Well, Paul Wise answered. Other solution is a fork project.

I think that is important say you that I want help. However, the
source code is very strange because the upstream is ignoring the basic
rules.

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#761697: DDPO: showing package adopted by third-party as being mine

[Joao Eriberto Mota Filho]

Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

I orphaned the package pacman4console in 2014-07-25. The package was
adopted by Alexandre Dantas in 2014-08-12 and I was the sponsor.
Currently, the package is shown in both DDPO[1][2].

I reviewed the package again and I can't see errors. So, it appear be
a DDPO bug.

Thanks for your attention.

Cheers,

Eriberto

[1] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=eribe...@debian.org
[2] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=e...@alexdantas.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#761697: DDPO: showing package adopted by third-party as being mine

[Eriberto]

For me is showed as Main. Not in sponsored. Take a look again.

Thanks,

Eriberto


2014-09-15 17:12 GMT-03:00 Daniel Lintott dan...@serverb.co.uk:
 Control: tags -1 moreinfo

 Hi Joao,

 On 15/09/14 20:40, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote:
 Package: qa.debian.org
 Severity: normal

 Dear Maintainer,

 I orphaned the package pacman4console in 2014-07-25. The package was
 adopted by Alexandre Dantas in 2014-08-12 and I was the sponsor.
 Currently, the package is shown in both DDPO[1][2].

 I reviewed the package again and I can't see errors. So, it appear be
 a DDPO bug.

 Thanks for your attention.

 Cheers,

 Eriberto

 [1] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=eribe...@debian.org
 [2] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=e...@alexdantas.net



 I've just had a look and from what I can see the output on DDPO is correct.

 On [1] (your DDPO page) the package is listed under Sponsored/other
 uploads. Whilst on [2] it is listed under main.

 Please correct me if I'm wrong!

 Cheers,

 Daniel




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#757966: RFS: lutris/0.3.4-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

Hi Pierre,

I checked your package and you are using/cloning the original upstream
packaging.

To put a package in Debian you must remove the debian/ directory from
upstream source code and generate a new tarball. So, you must start a
new Debian package. You can use some ideas from upstream, not clone
the code only.

I would like you to answer some questions:

1. Why the package is using CDBS?

2. What is the current DH level?

3. Where I can find the 'info' manual of the game?

4. Why the package hasn't a X-Python-Version field?

5. Your package must be main, contrib or non-free? Why?

If your want to put a package in Debian, you must have sufficient
skill to maintain this package and solve bugs etc. I suggest you look
at 'Debian New Maintainers' Guide'[1] and, after this, review your
package. If you have doubts, you can ask for help in Debian Mentors
List[2].

I wish a good work for you.

Cheers,

Eriberto

[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/
[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/

 2014-08-12 17:04 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff cont...@rudloff.pro:


 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: wishlist

 Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package lutris

* Package name: lutris
  Version : 0.3.4-1
  Upstream Author : Mathieu Comandon stryc...@gmail.com
* URL : https://lutris.net/
* License : GPLv3
  Section : games

 It builds those binary packages:

 lutris - Install and play any video game easily

 To access further information about this package, please visit the
 following
 URL:

 http://mentors.debian.net/package/lutris


 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
 command:

 dget -x
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lutris/lutris_0.3.4-1.dsc

 More information about lutris can be obtained from
 https://lutris.net/.

 Changes since the last upload:
* Rebuild for unstable
* Closes: #754129


 Regards,
Pierre Rudloff


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#753487: RFS: stda/1.3.1-1 -- new upstream release (package already in Debian)

[Eriberto Mota]

Perfect!

Thanks a lot for your work (as packager and as upstream).

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-14 11:45 GMT-03:00 Dimitar Ivanov drim...@freeshell.de:
 Hi Eriberto,

 may be my last message was not very clear or visually well-formated with the
 statment that the pakcage can be downloaded also from mentors.d.n (it should
 be there since Fri Sep 5). And I just tested successfully :-) fetching it
 by:

 dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stda/stda_1.3.1-2.dsc


 Cheers,
 Dimitar


 On Sun, 14 Sep 2014, Eriberto wrote:

 Hi Dimitar,

 A good work. However, the VCS is for your control. Please, upload your
 package to mentors.d.n to make easier my work. As a tip for you, all
 packages needing review must be put in mentors.d.n.

 I will wait for you.

 Cheers,

 Eriberto




 A new package is uploaded:

 dget -x
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stda/stda_1.3.1-2.dsc



 Hi Eriberto,

 I finished now with the Git-integration of my package. The new repository
 is
 published under the collab-maint project on Alioth:

 http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/stda.git

 All previous issues with the package should be fixed in the current
 version.
 Also the corresponding 'Vcs-Browser' and 'Vcs-Git' fields in the
 d/control
 file are defined respectively.

 Thanks a lot for you continuous support!

 Cheers,
 Dimitar





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

[Eriberto]

Hi Shawn,

About your package, please:

1. Please, create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can use
github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to
d/control. You can see an example here[1].

[1] 
http://sources.debian.net/src/yowsup/0.0~git20140314.938cf1-1/debian/control/

2. d/control:
 - In Homepage field you must to use
'http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=137789' only. Please,
use this address in d/copyright too.
 - Can you put semicolons at end of each line of the list and
separate the paragraphs? See an example here[1].
 - Fix the word connectivity.

[1] http://sources.debian.net/src/xombrero/2:1.6.3-1/debian/control/

3. d/copyright: in source code I can see names as Darwin M. Bautista
and Christian Hubinger. Please, inspect carefully the upstream code
and add all authors name.

4. d/rules: what does this line? -- include /usr/share/dpkg/default.mk

5. d/watch: your watch file don't work. Please, see here[2] how to
make a watch file. Remove all trash.

[2] http://eriberto.pro.br/blog/?p=1459

6. There are Lintian messages in your package:

I: kcm-ufw source: debian-watch-contains-dh_make-template
I: kcm-ufw: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/kde4/kcm_ufw.so incomming incoming
X: kcm-ufw: package-contains-broken-symlink
usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/kcontrol/ufw/common ../../common
X: kcm-ufw: package-contains-broken-symlink
usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/es/kcontrol/ufw/common ../../common

7. Put this line in d/rules:

export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wl,--as-needed

To solve these issues:

dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if
debian/kcm-ufw/usr/lib/kde4/kcm_ufw.so
debian/kcm-ufw/usr/lib/kde4/libexec/kcm_ufw_helper were not linked
against libQtDBus.so.4 (they use none of the library's symbols)
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if
debian/kcm-ufw/usr/lib/kde4/kcm_ufw.so
debian/kcm-ufw/usr/lib/kde4/libexec/kcm_ufw_helper were not linked
against libgcc_s.so.1 (they use none of the library's symbols)
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if
debian/kcm-ufw/usr/lib/kde4/kcm_ufw.so was not linked against
libQtSvg.so.4 (it uses none of the library's symbols)

8. Run the command 'blhc --all kcm-ufw_0.4.3-1_amd64.build' and you
will see several messages. To solve it, add to debian/rules:

export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all

Thanks for your work.

Cheers,

Eriberto

2014-09-14 18:06 GMT-03:00 Shawn Sörbom sh...@sorbom.com:
 Got it. I will do that today.
 Thanks,
 --Shawn


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#753487: RFS: stda/1.3.1-1 -- new upstream release (package already in Debian)

[Eriberto]

Hi Dimitar,

A good work. However, the VCS is for your control. Please, upload your
package to mentors.d.n to make easier my work. As a tip for you, all
packages needing review must be put in mentors.d.n.

I will wait for you.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-11 20:14 GMT-03:00 Dimitar Ivanov drim...@freeshell.de:

 On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Dimitar Ivanov wrote:


 Starting to use external GIT repository means that I need to change my
 work flow and to integrate the .git-tree in my present source-tree (also
 adjusting Makefile, etc) and how to structure the branches and tags before
 pushing changes. So, I'm currently tying to find out what is a common way to
 do so when preparing a debian package (e.g. [1]). If you know some
 documentation describing the standard procedures or good practices, this
 will be very helpful.

 .
 .
 .


 A new package is uploaded:

 dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stda/stda_1.3.1-2.dsc



 Hi Eriberto,

 I finished now with the Git-integration of my package. The new repository is
 published under the collab-maint project on Alioth:

 http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/stda.git

 All previous issues with the package should be fixed in the current version.
 Also the corresponding 'Vcs-Browser' and 'Vcs-Git' fields in the d/control
 file are defined respectively.

 Thanks a lot for you continuous support!

 Cheers,
 Dimitar



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

[Eriberto]

Sorry for my delay. I am travelling.

I was mistaken when I sent for you an example that closes #758163. The
#758163 is your RFS bug. Do you need open an ITP bug[1]
and close this ITP in d/changelog. The bug #758163 will be closed by
your sponsor after upload the package.

Cheers,

Eriberto

[1]  https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#l1


2014-09-12 21:09 GMT-03:00 Shawn Sörbom sh...@sorbom.com:
 Hi Eriberto,
 Sorry this took so long.
 I copied the changelog entry directly from your e-mail and re-uploaded the
 changes to mentors.debian.net. The error about improperly closing the wishlist
 bug is still persisting. I'm *really* confused now. what am I still doing
 wrong?
 Thanks,
 Shawn Sörbom

 On Wednesday, August 20, 2014 09:14:19 Eriberto wrote:
 As a tip for you, your package has a lot of comments (useless lines,
 trash). Please, clean your package.

 You can see an example here:
 http://sources.debian.net/src/pdfcrack/0.13-3/debian/

 Regards,

 Eriberto

 2014-08-20 9:07 GMT-03:00 Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br:
  Hi Shawn,
 
  The correct is:
* Initial release. (Closes: #758163)
 
  Regards,
 
  Eriberto
 
  2014-08-20 7:38 GMT-03:00 Shawn Sörbom sh...@sorbom.com:
  Hi Eriberto,
  I saw an error stating that I had closed the bug improperly when I
  uploaded to the mentors page. I was a bit confused though, did I do
  something wrong in the debian/changelog file, or did I do something
  improper with the subject line in the BTS?
  Thanks,
  --Shawn
  Edit: I re-uploaded with a new changelog that mentions ITP, but the error
  persists.
  What am I doing wrong?
 
  Thanks for your quick response to my RFS.
 
  On Tuesday, August 19, 2014 11:46:51 Eriberto Mota wrote:
  tags 758163
  thanks
 
 
  Hi Shawn,
 
  To submit a new package to Debian you need an ITP[1]. Your package is
  closing thisRFS bug instead an ITP. Please, fix it.
 
  Regards,
 
  Eriberto
 
  [1] https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#l1
 
  2014-08-14 18:52 GMT-03:00 Shawn Sörbom sh...@sorbom.com:
   Package: sponsorship-requests
   Severity: normal
  
   Dear mentors,
  
   I am looking for a sponsor for my package kcm-ufw
  
   * Package name: kcm-ufw
  
 Version : 0.4.3-1
  
   * Upstream Author : Craig Drummond craig.p.drumm...@gmail.com
  
 URL :
 http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/UFW+KControl+Module?content=137
 789
  
   * License : GPL-3
  
 Section : KDE
  
   It builds those binary packages:
   kcm-ufw- A KDE Control Center module for the Uncomplicated
   Firewall
  
   To access further information about this package, please visit the
   following
  
   URL:
 http://mentors.debian.net/package/kcm-ufw
  
   Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
 command:
   dget -x
   http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kcm-ufw/kcm-ufw_0.4.3
   -1.
   dsc
  
 More information about hello can be obtained from
 http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/UFW+KControl+Module?content=137
 789
 .
  
 Changes since the last upload:
  
 remove templates, fix some lintian errors.
  
  
 Regards,
  
  Shawn Sörbom
  
   --
   To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
   with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
   listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:
   https://lists.debian.org/4686041.pJiRfaaaFi@medusa


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#747032: RFS: libjs-zxcvbn/1.0+dfsg.1-1

[Eriberto Mota]

Thanks Helmut.

Eriberto


2014-09-12 5:27 GMT-03:00 Helmut Grohne hel...@subdivi.de:
 On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 08:54:09AM -0300, Eriberto Mota wrote:
 Jackub, do you have conviction that buildd has Internet access?
 Nevertheless, the download when building is undesirable.

 Jakub was meaning to say that even though policy does not allow
 interacting with the internet during build, many of the currently
 running buildds do not enforce this. So at the moment you could likely
 upload a (policy violating) package that downloads stuff during build
 and have it successfully built on most buildds.

 That said, this topic is not uncontroversial as some folks would like to
 be able to use apt-get source during build as a means for avoiding more
 binary packages postfixed -source.

 Helmut


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140912082707.ga19...@alf.mars



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#757966: RFS: lutris/0.3.4-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

Hi Pierre,

You have several important messages yet. If you don

2014-09-13 12:48 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff cont...@rudloff.pro:
 Hello,

 I fixed the errors and some of the warnings and reuploaded the package.

 Regards,

 Le 18/08/2014 04:13, Eriberto Mota a écrit :

 tags 757966 moreinfo
 thanks

 Hi Pierre,

 I saw your package in mentors.debian.org and it has several Lintian
 messages.

 IMHO, to get a sponsor you must, at least, clear your package removing
 all possible messages.

 Regards,

 Eriberto

 2014-08-12 17:04 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff cont...@rudloff.pro:

 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: wishlist

 Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package lutris

   * Package name: lutris
 Version : 0.3.4-1
 Upstream Author : Mathieu Comandon stryc...@gmail.com
   * URL : https://lutris.net/
   * License : GPLv3
 Section : games

 It builds those binary packages:

lutris - Install and play any video game easily

 To access further information about this package, please visit the
 following
 URL:

 http://mentors.debian.net/package/lutris


 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lutris/lutris_0.3.4-1.dsc

 More information about lutris can be obtained from https://lutris.net/.

 Changes since the last upload:
   * Rebuild for unstable
   * Closes: #754129


 Regards,
   Pierre Rudloff


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53ea7347.5070...@rudloff.pro




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#757966: RFS: lutris/0.3.4-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

Hi Pierre,

You have several important messages yet[1]. If you don't fix it, will
be very hard get a sponsor.

[1] http://mentors.debian.net/package/lutris

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-13 13:53 GMT-03:00 Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br:
 Hi Pierre,

 You have several important messages yet. If you don

 2014-09-13 12:48 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff cont...@rudloff.pro:
 Hello,

 I fixed the errors and some of the warnings and reuploaded the package.

 Regards,

 Le 18/08/2014 04:13, Eriberto Mota a écrit :

 tags 757966 moreinfo
 thanks

 Hi Pierre,

 I saw your package in mentors.debian.org and it has several Lintian
 messages.

 IMHO, to get a sponsor you must, at least, clear your package removing
 all possible messages.

 Regards,

 Eriberto

 2014-08-12 17:04 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff cont...@rudloff.pro:

 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: wishlist

 Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package lutris

   * Package name: lutris
 Version : 0.3.4-1
 Upstream Author : Mathieu Comandon stryc...@gmail.com
   * URL : https://lutris.net/
   * License : GPLv3
 Section : games

 It builds those binary packages:

lutris - Install and play any video game easily

 To access further information about this package, please visit the
 following
 URL:

 http://mentors.debian.net/package/lutris


 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lutris/lutris_0.3.4-1.dsc

 More information about lutris can be obtained from https://lutris.net/.

 Changes since the last upload:
   * Rebuild for unstable
   * Closes: #754129


 Regards,
   Pierre Rudloff


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53ea7347.5070...@rudloff.pro




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#699139: [disktype] outputs misencoded Volume name for UDF disk (4300690076006900[...])

[Eriberto]

Thanks Filipus. I asked the upstream for a new version. We need wait a
reply now...

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-13 15:43 GMT-03:00 Filipus Klutiero chea...@gmail.com:
 Hi Eriberto,


 On 2014-09-13 00:15, Eriberto Mota wrote:

 Hi Filipus,

 I am the new disktype maintainer.

 Can you check if the file udf.c[1], dated 2009-04-05, solves the
 problem? If yes, I will add a patch to disktype.

 Thanks a lot for your attention.

 Cheers,

 Eriberto

 [1]
 http://disktype.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/disktype/disktype/udf.c?revision=1.6view=markup


 The only difference with the current file is indentation, so... no, no
 improvement.

 --
 Filipus Klutiero
 http://www.philippecloutier.com



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#699139: [disktype] outputs misencoded Volume name for UDF disk (4300690076006900[...])

[Eriberto Mota]

Hi Filipus,

I am the new disktype maintainer.

Can you check if the file udf.c[1], dated 2009-04-05, solves the
problem? If yes, I will add a patch to disktype.

Thanks a lot for your attention.

Cheers,

Eriberto

[1] 
http://disktype.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/disktype/disktype/udf.c?revision=1.6view=markup


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#747032: RFS: libjs-zxcvbn/1.0+dfsg.1-1

[Eriberto Mota]

Hum... Yesterday, in #debian-mentors (IRC), bremner confirmed that
buildd block the Internet access.

[15:27] eriberto Hi! A package in main can't download files when
building. But in Debian Policy the §2.2.1 doesn't is clear about it.
Can I use the §2.2.1 to this case?
[15:29] bremner eriberto: no amount of policy-lawyering will
magically give you network access on the buildd
[15:31] eriberto bremmer, ok. So, to confirm, the buildd doesn't
have Internet access, right?
[15:31] bremner correct.
[15:31] bremner in any case, it makes no sense for a source package
to download things. How could the ftp-masters possibly check such a
thing?
[15:32] eriberto Yeap.
[15:32] eriberto I think that is a DFSG violation too.
[15:33] bremner I guess. It seems kindof hypothetical.
[15:34] eriberto A discrimination against persons that no have
Internet access. These person can't build the package.
[15:35] bremner ok, but aside from a Debian themed trivia quiz, why
is it important to decide?
[15:35] geofft what are you actually trying to do?
[15:36] geofft (there's some discussion on debian-devel that access
to the Debian archive itself is a special case)
[15:36] geofft (but chances are your package is not a special case,
which is why Im asking :) )
[15:38] eriberto I am replying about a package that needs sponsor.
[15:39] eriberto But is all right. Thanks guys!
[15:39] bremner In that case I'd restrict yourself to the
non-philosophical point that package will just be rejected by
ftp-masters, and if it isn't, it will ftbfs everywhere
[15:40] eriberto Yes. I am writing about why the package can't be
put in Debian.

Jackub, do you have conviction that buildd has Internet access?
Nevertheless, the download when building is undesirable.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-11 8:07 GMT-03:00 Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org:
 I completely agree that downloading anything at build-time is a no-no,
 but...

 * Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org, 2014-09-10, 15:45:

 3. The buildd system, that builds packages in Debian, don't have access to
 the Internet.


 This is a common misconception. Buildds do not block Internet access.
 (Although hopefully they will do this in the future!)

 --
 Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#747484: RFS: python-kmodpy/0.1.10-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto Mota]

Hi Chrysostomos,

Thanks for all fixes and for your work (as packager and upstream too).

Uploaded.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-11 8:21 GMT-03:00 Chrysostomos Nanakos nana...@wired-net.gr:
 Hi Eriberto,

 On 2014-09-10 19:34, Eriberto Mota wrote:

 tags 747484 moreinfo
 thanks


 Hi Nanakos.

 Please:

 1. Use DH 9, instead DH 7.


 Fixed.


 2. d/control:
 - Please, create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can
 use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to
 d/control. You can see an example here[1].

 [1]


 http://sources.debian.net/src/yowsup/0.0~git20140314.938cf1-1/debian/control/


 Added.

 - Use a conventional text to describe your package. Remove the
 underlined title. Explain what is the libkmod. Remove example. You can
 put your example in a manpage or in d/README.Debian or in
 /usr/share/doc/python-kmodpy/examples.


 Added a d/README.Debian

 - The upstream source code name is 'kmodpy'. So, your 'Source'
 field must have 'kmodpy' instead 'python-kmodpy'. The tarball name
 must be kmodpy_0.1.10.orig.tar.gz.


 Fixed.

 3. d/copyright: note that here you used 'kmodpy' as 'Upstream-Name'
 and it is right. Please, in the packaging license (under GPL-2+), add
 your email address.



 Fixed.


 4. When building, I can see:

 pyversions: missing X(S)-Python-Version in control file, fall back to
 debian/pyversions
 pyversions: missing debian/pyversions file, fall back to supported
 versions



 Fixed.

 You can find the new package in mentors [1]

 Cheers,
 Chrysostomos.


 
 [1]: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kmodpy/kmodpy_0.1.10-1.dsc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#747169: RFS: socksjs-twisted/1.2.1-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto Mota]

Hi Alexandre,

2014-09-11 9:27 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Rossi alexandre.ro...@gmail.com:

- Please, create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can
 use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to
 d/control. You can see an example here[1].

 Done.


You need use 'git://' to Vcs-Git, intead of 'https://'.


 2. d/copyright:

 - Use the verbatim license from upstream code (LICENSE file). As
 an example, the upstream says Neither the name of the Christopher
 Gamble nor the names of its, while the d/copyright says Neither the
 name of Oracle nor the names of its.

 Fixed.

 - I found this:

 qunit/html/static/qunit.css: * Copyright (c) 2011 John Resig, Jörn Zaefferer
 qunit/html/static/qunit.css- * Dual licensed under the MIT (MIT-LICENSE.txt)
 qunit/html/static/qunit.css- * or GPL (GPL-LICENSE.txt) licenses.

 Please, check each file and its licenses. I suggest 'grep -sriA25
 copyright *' to help you.

 I fixed it and other stuff.


Please, I found new names as Ariel Flesler and The Dojo Foundation
(from your patch).

How you concluded that txsockjs/websockets.py is under MIT license? Do
you checked this information at this site[1]?

[1] http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/browser/branches/websocket-4173-2?rev=29073

If yes, the license must be put inside the source code. From MIT
license: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall
be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software..
So, if no have references in source code (about the license and
origin), the upstream didn't can distribute this code without break
the licensing rules.

I am very concerned because I think that the upstream source code has
several files or extracts of codes from other upstreams without
licenses. If yes, the socksjs-twisted upstream needs to fix this
issue.


 3. What makes your patch? My impression is that you are injecting a
 third-part code in upstream. Is this? If yes, you must add it as an
 dependency of the package. If not packaged, you need package it.

 The patch adds the missing source for minified js files. See
 https://lintian.debian.org/tags/source-is-missing.html


Ok. But the lintian says: add it to debian/missing-sources
directory. And as I said, this code must be referenced in
d/copyright.

What is the origin of this code? (you must add it to the patch header)

There is this code packaged in Debian?


 6. Do you see these lintian messages?

 P: sockjs-twisted source: source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object
 qunit/html/static/jquery.min.js
 P: sockjs-twisted source: source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object
 qunit/html/static/qunit.min.js

 Those are fixed by the patch and are false positives, see above and a
 lintian bug :
 https://bugs.debian.org/744972


I can be wrong. But the pointed site is about missing sources. Please see it[2].

[2] 
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object.html

Alexandre, I am unconfortable with this package. I need your attention
to explain/fix the issues.

Cheers,

Eriberto


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#761134: [Help] strange 'missing-dependency-on-perlapi' lintian warning (Was: Bug#761134: libsbml5-perl: Depends on libperl5.18 but should be libperl5.20 now)

[Eriberto]

Hi Andreas,

I didn't see the package. However, it can be a false positive from new
Lintian. I already had three false positives from new checks.

Please, see the bugs of the Lintian in BTS to identify if it is or not
a false positive.

I hope this help.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-11 17:31 GMT-03:00 Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu:
 Hi,

 I would like to upload libsbml5 but despite the fact that
 ${perl:Depends} is specified and dh calls dh_perl automatically this
 lintian error occures.  To enable easy inspection I have uploaded the
 preliminary packages to

https://people.debian.org/~tille/packages/libsmbl5/

 Any help to fix this lintian problem is welcome

 Andreas.

 On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:27:39AM -0700, Steve Lane wrote:
 Thanks very much.  Now I guess I wait for it to show up on the webpage
 and in the repo, yes..?

 Best,

 --
 Steve Lane

 On Sep 11 09:24, Andreas Tille wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I think a package rebuild should be sufficient to close this bug.
  Thus I commited
 
* rebuild with latest libperl
  Closes: #761134
 
  to the changelog.
 
  Ivo,  it is *really* high time to upload libsbml if we want to deliver
  it in Jessie.  Do you have any idea why the current state of SVN does
  not build on other machines.  Please communicate your problems or lets
  consult debian-mentors.  We are really short in time before the freeze
  (2014-11-05).
 
  Kind regards
 
   Andreas.
 



 --
 http://fam-tille.de


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140911203113.ga30...@an3as.eu



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys

[Eriberto Mota]

tags 712787 moreinfo
thanks


Hi Martin,

You didn't put the ITP number in d/changelog.

To make easier the review, please, upload your package to mentors.debian.net.

Thanks,

Eriberto


2014-04-22 5:28 GMT-03:00 Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de:
 ITP finally went through after Don added some additional stripping to the mail
 parsing.

 ITP: distkeys -- Distkeys - upload SSH keys to servers and more
 http://bugs.debian.org/745478

 Thanks,

 --
 Martin Steigerwald
 Consultant / Trainer

 teamix GmbH
 Südwestpark 43
 90449 Nürnberg

 fon:  +49 911 30999 55
 fax:  +49 911 30999 99
 mail: martin.steigerw...@teamix.de
 web:  http://www.teamix.de
 blog: http://blog.teamix.de

 Amtsgericht Nürnberg, HRB 18320
 Geschäftsführer: Oliver Kügow, Richard Müller

 ** Wissenstag Spezial „Datacenter Networking“ – 21.05.2014 ** 
 http://www.teamix.de/spezial


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: https://lists.debian.org/4141474.rQYKiFAbix@mango



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#747169: RFS: socksjs-twisted/1.2.1-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

tags 747169 moreinfo
thanks


Hi Alexandre.

About your package, the upstream name is 'sockjs-twisted' but your
package is named as 'socksjs-twisted'. Can you check this?

Thanks.

Cheers,

Eriberto






2014-05-06 4:36 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Rossi alexandre.ro...@gmail.com:
 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: normal

 Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package socksjs-twisted

  * Package name: socksjs-twisted
Version : 1.2.1-1
Upstream Author : Christopher Gamble ch...@chrisgamble.net
  * URL : http://github.com/Fugiman/sockjs-twisted
  * License : BSD
Section : python

 It builds those binary packages:

 python-twisted-socksjs - Simple library for adding SockJS support
 to a twisted application

 To access further information about this package, please visit the
 following URL:

   http://mentors.debian.net/package/socksjs-twisted

 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

 dget -x 
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/socksjs-twisted/socksjs-twisted_1.2.1-1.dsc

 Regards,

 Alex


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: 
 https://lists.debian.org/CAM79t8ENiR=qxgio1+l8vdg7y0qtrbklwesdzjf-xbfvk_0...@mail.gmail.com



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#747032: RFS: libjs-zxcvbn/1.0+dfsg.1-1

[Eriberto]

Please, ignore it:

 1. d/changelog: remove the word 'bug'.

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#747484: RFS: python-kmodpy/0.1.10-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto Mota]

tags 747484 moreinfo
thanks


Hi Nanakos.

Please:

1. Use DH 9, instead DH 7.

2. d/control:
- Please, create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can
use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to
d/control. You can see an example here[1].

[1] 
http://sources.debian.net/src/yowsup/0.0~git20140314.938cf1-1/debian/control/

- Use a conventional text to describe your package. Remove the
underlined title. Explain what is the libkmod. Remove example. You can
put your example in a manpage or in d/README.Debian or in
/usr/share/doc/python-kmodpy/examples.

- The upstream source code name is 'kmodpy'. So, your 'Source'
field must have 'kmodpy' instead 'python-kmodpy'. The tarball name
must be kmodpy_0.1.10.orig.tar.gz.

3. d/copyright: note that here you used 'kmodpy' as 'Upstream-Name'
and it is right. Please, in the packaging license (under GPL-2+), add
your email address.

4. When building, I can see:

pyversions: missing X(S)-Python-Version in control file, fall back to
debian/pyversions
pyversions: missing debian/pyversions file, fall back to supported versions

You can read more about it here[2].

[2] 
https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-module_packages.html#s-specifying_versions

Thanks a lot for your work.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-05-09 6:08 GMT-03:00 Nanakos Chrysostomos nana...@wired-net.gr:
 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]

 Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-kmodpy

 * Package name: python-kmodpy
   Version : 0.1.10-1
   Upstream Author : Chrysostoos Nanakos ch...@include.gr
 * URL : https://github.com/cnanakos/kmodpy/
 * License : GPL-3+
   Section : python

 It builds those binary packages:

   python-kmodpy - Python binding for kmod

 To access further information about this package, please visit the following
 URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-kmodpy


 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

   dget -x
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-kmodpy/python-kmodpy_0.1.10-1.dsc


 Changes since the last upload:

 * Initial release (Closes: Bug#747480)


 Regards,
  Nanakos Chrysostomos


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive:
 https://lists.debian.org/4d706260de7e10179ca49f92eeacf...@mail.wired-net.gr



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#747032: RFS: libjs-zxcvbn/1.0+dfsg.1-1

[Eriberto Mota]

Hi again.

I did new tests and the package, when building, downloads lots of
files from http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary.

The download files at build time is discouraged because:

1. The package can be afected by a worm or can act as a spyware.

2. The package can't be built offline. Maybe it will make the package
non-free, because now we can have discrimination against persons that
no have Internet access (see DFSG[1]). The Debian Policy §2.2.1 says:

2.2.1 The main archive area
The main archive area comprises the Debian distribution. Only the
packages in this area are considered part of the distribution. None of
the packages in the main archive area require software outside of that
area to function.
[...]
In addition, the packages in main:
  - must not require or recommend a package outside of main for
compilation or execution
[...].

3. The buildd system, that builds packages in Debian, don't have
access to the Internet.

4. The injected files can violate the original license of the
upstream source code.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-10 12:50 GMT-03:00 Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br:
 Please, ignore it:

 1. d/changelog: remove the word 'bug'.

 Cheers,

 Eriberto


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#761074: RFS: cputool/0.0.7-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto Mota]

Hi Nigel,

Perfect!!! Congratulations from a perfectionist. You are unbeatable!

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-10 12:03 GMT-03:00 Nigel Kukard nkuk...@lbsd.net:
 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: wishlist

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package cputool

 * Package name: cputool
   Version : 0.0.7-1
   Upstream Author : Nigel Kukard nkuk...@lbsd.net
 * URL : http://gitlab.devlabs.linuxassist.net/cputool/cputool
 * License : GPL-3+
   Section : utils

  It builds those binary packages:

cputool- Utility which manages CPU usage and system load

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
 following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/cputool


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cputool/cputool_0.0.7-1.dsc


  Changes since the last upload:

  * Initial release. (Closes: #761065)


  Regards,
   Nigel Kukard


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: https://lists.debian.org/sig.1330e5c406.54106851.5080...@lbsd.net



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#761074: RFS: cputool/0.0.7-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

Sorry Tobi!

I crashed with you. I already uploaded the package. :-(

Your message was sent one minute before I sent my message but I
uploaded one minute before your message. :-P

Nigel, the Tobias's eyes is better of mine. So, consider these
adjustments for next upload. But you got a The quality of the package
is very good again.

My friends, have a nice end of day.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-10 17:22 GMT-03:00 Tobias Frost t...@debian.org:
 Control: owner -1 !
 Tags: pending

 Hi Nigel,

 The quality of the package is very good;
 I just saw a few nitpicks which I'd ask you fix before I upload it:

 - d/copyright
  - please join the lines AllWorldIT and your contact (as it does not
 describe a new copyright)
  - mind to add a Upstream-Contact Header?
  - Comment (line 3) is not needed, please remove it (its in d/control)
  - there are extra ,s after the years in line 8 and 12
  - has a final blank line

 - d/control
  - I'd prefer only to override when necessary. In this case, please
 remove the file using d/clean.
  - please use dh_autoreconf

 Thanks for your contribution!

 --
 tobi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#747169: RFS: socksjs-twisted/1.2.1-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto Mota]

tags 747169 moreinfo
thanks


2014-09-10 12:52 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Rossi alexandre.ro...@gmail.com:
 About your package, the upstream name is 'sockjs-twisted' but your
 package is named as 'socksjs-twisted'. Can you check this?

 The half-an-hour-lost typo. Sorry. A fixed package has been uploaded
 to debian mentors.

Ha ha ha. The life is hard.

I will try help you with this package.

1. d/control:

- Sorry, but your long description is strange. My impression is
that you tried to transform a paragraph in a list, without basic
modifications. Please, can you adjust it? Use semicolons instead
commas in the list at end of line.

   - Please, create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can
use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to
d/control. You can see an example here[1].

[1] 
http://sources.debian.net/src/yowsup/0.0~git20140314.938cf1-1/debian/control/

2. d/copyright:

- Use the verbatim license from upstream code (LICENSE file). As
an example, the upstream says Neither the name of the Christopher
Gamble nor the names of its, while the d/copyright says Neither the
name of Oracle nor the names of its.

- I found this:

qunit/html/static/qunit.css: * Copyright (c) 2011 John Resig, Jörn Zaefferer
qunit/html/static/qunit.css- * Dual licensed under the MIT (MIT-LICENSE.txt)
qunit/html/static/qunit.css- * or GPL (GPL-LICENSE.txt) licenses.

Please, check each file and its licenses. I suggest 'grep -sriA25
copyright *' to help you.

- I suggest (you can drop it) that you put the license texts as
end of file. You can see an example here[2]. It will make easier to
visualize the files.

[2] 
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/e/ext4magic/unstable_copyright

3. What makes your patch? My impression is that you are injecting a
third-part code in upstream. Is this? If yes, you mus add it as an
dependency of the package. If not packaged, you need package it.

4. d/watch: githubredir is deprecated and GitHub accepts scan. Please,
read this[3].

[3] http://eriberto.pro.br/blog/?p=1459

5. When building, we have a message:

dpkg-gencontrol: warning: Breaks field of package
python-twisted-sockjs: unknown substitution variable ${python:Breaks}

6. Do you saw these lintian messages?

P: sockjs-twisted source: source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object
qunit/html/static/jquery.min.js
P: sockjs-twisted source: source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object
qunit/html/static/qunit.min.js

Thanks for your work. I will wait your reply.

Cheers,

Eriberto


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#747032: RFS: libjs-zxcvbn/1.0+dfsg.1-1

[Eriberto]

2014-09-10 19:15 GMT-03:00 Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au:
 On 09-Sep-2014, Eriberto Mota wrote:
 About your package, please:

 Thank you for reviewing and providing feedback on this package.


I am glad to help you.


 2. d/control: in short description there is an 'indent' signal.
 Please, change to a simple dash. Do the same in d/copyright.

 I don't know what “indent signal” is. Are you referring to a
 punctuation character?

 All the control files in a Debian source package are Unicode
 URL:https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html,
 so as far as I can tell these control fields can contain any
 appropriate punctuation.

 Is there some other problem with these fields?


Sorry but I am not English native. I will try explain using the
characters. I would like that you to change — by -.


 3. d/copyright: there are files licensing to other authors that not
 Dropbox. Please, review carefully all files. As help, use 'grep
 -sriA25 copyright *'.

 Thank you, I will look more closely and update the copyright
 information.


Ok!


 4. Your package doesn't build in my machine. It stops showing '( cd
 scripts  python build_frequency_lists.py )' in screen.

 You later appeared to get further in the build process. Is this still
 a problem for you?


No. When downloading, the screen activities stop some time. So, I
waited more time and I saw the package building.


 On 10-Sep-2014, Eriberto Mota wrote:
 I did new tests and the package, when building, downloads lots of
 files from http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary.

 The download files at build time is discouraged […]

 I agree with these reasons. Do you have a different approach which
 would avoid generated files in the source package without
 corresponding source?

 I would like to find a solution that improves the upstream package and
 doesn't bundle sourceless data files, but upstream are not responsive
 to discussing these improvements. Maybe I'll need to host a fork
 myself.

I think that there are four solutions (maybe you will need ask about
it in debian-legal, maybe no):

1. If the license permit, you can package the files from
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary. However I have doubts if you
can do it (gather all files in a tarball and package it).

2. You can make a package that shows an notification to user and
downloads the files via postinst script. The site must allow it. I
think that this package will be contrib[1].

3. You can write a d/README.Debian to instruct the final user to
download and install the files.

4. You can do a complete fork in GitHub.

[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-contrib

Good night from Brazil!

Cheers,

Eriberto


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#751009: RFS: ppp-gatekeeper/0.1.0-201406111015-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

Hi Nigel,

Sorry for my delay.

2014-09-08 7:01 GMT-03:00 Nigel Kukard nkuk...@lbsd.net:
 Hi there Eriberto,
 No problem at all, I really do appreciate your time :)


I am glad to help you.


 I'm looking at d-policy #3.4  #5.6.13 but I can't find what the length
 limit is. I kept the entire line to under 80 to be sure.


Here is your answer:

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/ppp-gatekeeper/ppp-gatekeeper_0.1.0-201406111015-1.dsc


 I have two questions to ask clarification on:

 1. If there were 100 files, each file having a different date range in the
 copyright line, would I need to list each and every one?


No. A program is 'one' code only. Consider that you have pacman-cool.
See the files:

pacman-cool.c, by (John One in 2012, 2013 and 2014) and (Maria Eggs in
2013, under GPL-3+).
pacman-cool.h, by (John One in 2013) and (Maria Eggs in 2013, under GPL-3+).
pacman-cool.1, by (Maria Eggs in 2014, under GPL-3+).
pacman-cool-scores.c, by (Lion Fox in 2013 and 2014, under GPL-3+).

The AUTHORS file (or other file) lists the all names above. Then:

Files: *
Copyright: 2012-2014 John One j...@one.org
   2013-2014 Lion Fox f...@mailgh.com
 Maria Eggs ma...@eggs.com.it
License: GPL-3.0+

You can see more details here: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/#copyright-field


 For instance, say a package is the combination of a few other projects, its
 quite possible that some may list 2014, some 2009-2014, some 2004-2005 for
 instance.


The same case, if I think that I understood your question.


 2. My second question is if there are say 5 people listed in the files
 copyright line, how would these be properly listed? would the first one
 appear on the copyright line in d-control and the rest below it indented 1
 space from the left?


Ok. I think that I replied above. See an example here:

http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/s/sentinella/unstable_copyright


 As I may not be the only person that authored the files, I changed by to
 contact, I hope this is acceptable.


No problem. I improved the indentation only.


 4. As curiosity, why you says 'Source:
 https://gitlab.devlabs.linuxassist.net/ppp-gatekeeper/ppp-gatekeeper'
 in d/copyright but uses
 'http://download.allworldit.org/ppp-gatekeeper' in d/watch?


 The first link is the revision control site used for the project, The
 copyright URL points to the revision control site as it is the most up to
 date.

 The package was downloaded from the second link you mentioned. While the
 first site offers limited downloading, it lacks hashes and also doesn't
 support signatures. On the second site the sources are hashed and signed. It
 also lists all versions nicely and in a nice order. This download link is
 also listed in the wiki on the project site.

 I can change the URL in the copyright file, I just thought it best to point
 to the revision control URL as this is most up to date.


I think that the best is use a URL only. The copyright file must to
say where you really downloaded the code. You can add a 'Comment'
field below the 'Source' to list the revision control site.


 I've been over all mails twice, and I am hoping very much that this time all
 is good.

 I've re-uploaded the latest revision.


Your package is very good and I uploaded it.

Thanks a lot for your work (as upstream and as packager).

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#760198: BUG #760198 (RFS ircii)

[Eriberto]

Hi Denis,

I checked the source and your code has differences from original upstream. See:

---
diff -Naur 1/ircii/script/complete ircii-20140831/script/complete
--- 1/ircii/script/complete 2001-08-13 07:40:51.0 -0300
+++ ircii-20140831/script/complete  2001-08-12 12:44:17.0 -0300
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 # inspired by the tcsh shell 'complete' command
 # version .8 (alpha) Do NOT distribute
 # Tue Jul 13 13:16:01 MDT 1993
-@ RCS.complete = [$$Header: /local/cvs/ircii/script/complete,v 1.2
2001/08/12 15:44:17 mrg Exp $$]
+@ RCS.complete = [$$Header: /home/cvs/ircii/script/complete,v 1.2
2001/08/12 15:44:17 mrg Exp $$]
 #
 # Commands:
 #   compl.add [-null] [-nomatch] command pattern command parser name
diff -Naur 1/ircii/script/dccchan ircii-20140831/script/dccchan
--- 1/ircii/script/dccchan  2001-08-13 07:40:51.0 -0300
+++ ircii-20140831/script/dccchan   2001-08-12 12:44:17.0 -0300
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 #
 # /dpart to leave

-@ RCS.dccchan = [$$Header: /local/cvs/ircii/script/dccchan,v 1.2
2001/08/12 15:44:17 mrg Exp $$]
+@ RCS.dccchan = [$$Header: /home/cvs/ircii/script/dccchan,v 1.2
2001/08/12 15:44:17 mrg Exp $$]
 @ dchan.portnum = 7000

 # open listening connection on the specified port number
diff -Naur 1/ircii/script/functions ircii-20140831/script/functions
--- 1/ircii/script/functions2001-08-13 07:40:51.0 -0300
+++ ircii-20140831/script/functions 2001-08-12 12:44:17.0 -0300
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 # Some misc functions..  for 2.2 and beyond.
 # by: Ian Frechette  (frech...@spot.colorado.edu)
 # Wed Aug 18 00:26:53 MDT 1993
-@ RCS.functions = [$$Header: /local/cvs/ircii/script/functions,v 1.3
2001/08/12 15:44:17 mrg Exp $$]
+@ RCS.functions = [$$Header: /home/cvs/ircii/script/functions,v 1.3
2001/08/12 15:44:17 mrg Exp $$]


 # ircII scripting note.  @ var = expression is used a lot. One case
diff -Naur 1/ircii/script/history-match ircii-20140831/script/history-match
--- 1/ircii/script/history-match2001-08-13 07:40:52.0 -0300
+++ ircii-20140831/script/history-match 2001-08-12 12:44:17.0 -0300
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 # modify the pattern or hit return it will reset the search to something
 # new..

-@ RCS.ircIId = [$$Header: /local/cvs/ircii/script/history-match,v 1.2
2001/08/12 15:44:17 mrg Exp $$]
+@ RCS.ircIId = [$$Header: /home/cvs/ircii/script/history-match,v 1.2
2001/08/12 15:44:17 mrg Exp $$]

 bind meta2-p parse history.expn $L

diff -Naur 1/ircii/script/imap ircii-20140831/script/imap
--- 1/ircii/script/imap 2003-12-08 05:55:34.0 -0200
+++ ircii-20140831/script/imap  2003-12-08 03:05:59.0 -0200
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
 ^set novice off
 ^set max_recursion 50

-@ RCS.imap = [$$Header: /local/cvs/ircii/script/imap,v 1.5 2003/12/08
05:05:59 mrg Exp $$]
+@ RCS.imap = [$$Header: /home/cvs/ircii/script/imap,v 1.5 2003/12/08
05:05:59 mrg Exp $$]
 eval @ map.mask = encode(*.)
 # @ map.str = [| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ]

diff -Naur 1/ircii/script/newformat ircii-20140831/script/newformat
--- 1/ircii/script/newformat2001-08-13 07:40:53.0 -0300
+++ ircii-20140831/script/newformat 2001-08-12 12:44:17.0 -0300
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 # formatting.


-@ RCS.newformat = [$$Header: /local/cvs/ircii/script/newformat,v 1.3
2001/08/12 15:44:17 mrg Exp $$]
+@ RCS.newformat = [$$Header: /home/cvs/ircii/script/newformat,v 1.3
2001/08/12 15:44:17 mrg Exp $$]
 # An operator command. ESC-t turns this option on and off.
 # It allows one to see users or not see them in a TRACE.
 # It also effects the output of STAT l
-


Do you changed the original source code?

Your d/changelog hasn't any register about your changes. It has this text only:

--
ircii (20140831-1) unstable; urgency=low
  * New upstream release:
- Closes: #655261, #747700)

 -- Denis Rodrigues Ferreira denis...@gmail.com  Fri, 5 Sep 2014
13:03:50 +0100
-


Sorry, but I no longer intend to sponsor this package. Good lucky!

Cheers,

Eriberto



2014-09-08 11:38 GMT-03:00 Denis Rodrigues denis...@gmail.com:
 Eriberto, did an new upload of ircII package with the changes.

 The dsc file can be found at:
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ircii/ircii_20140831-1.dsc

 Thanks for your time and attention!



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#760198: BUG #760198 (RFS ircii)

[Eriberto]

Very extraneous because your package and the upstream version have the
same version number (20140831).

Bye!


2014-09-09 15:15 GMT-03:00 Denis Rodrigues denis...@gmail.com:
 Hi Eriberto!

 I did not make any modifications to the source code. This last package is
 the latest version of upstream and is newer than the last package I
 uploaded.

 But I appreciate your attention and time spent with this package.


 Obrigado!

 2014-09-09 15:00 GMT-03:00 Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br:

 Hi Denis,

 I checked the source and your code has differences from original upstream.
 See:

 ---
 diff -Naur 1/ircii/script/complete ircii-20140831/script/complete
 --- 1/ircii/script/complete 2001-08-13 07:40:51.0 -0300
 +++ ircii-20140831/script/complete  2001-08-12 12:44:17.0
 -0300
 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
  # inspired by the tcsh shell 'complete' command
  # version .8 (alpha) Do NOT distribute
  # Tue Jul 13 13:16:01 MDT 1993
 -@ RCS.complete = [$$Header: /local/cvs/ircii/script/complete,v 1.2
 2001/08/12 15:44:17 mrg Exp $$]
 +@ RCS.complete = [$$Header: /home/cvs/ircii/script/complete,v 1.2
 2001/08/12 15:44:17 mrg Exp $$]
  #
  # Commands:
  #   compl.add [-null] [-nomatch] command pattern command parser name
 diff -Naur 1/ircii/script/dccchan ircii-20140831/script/dccchan
 --- 1/ircii/script/dccchan  2001-08-13 07:40:51.0 -0300
 +++ ircii-20140831/script/dccchan   2001-08-12 12:44:17.0
 -0300
 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
  #
  # /dpart to leave

 -@ RCS.dccchan = [$$Header: /local/cvs/ircii/script/dccchan,v 1.2
 2001/08/12 15:44:17 mrg Exp $$]
 +@ RCS.dccchan = [$$Header: /home/cvs/ircii/script/dccchan,v 1.2
 2001/08/12 15:44:17 mrg Exp $$]
  @ dchan.portnum = 7000

  # open listening connection on the specified port number
 diff -Naur 1/ircii/script/functions ircii-20140831/script/functions
 --- 1/ircii/script/functions2001-08-13 07:40:51.0 -0300
 +++ ircii-20140831/script/functions 2001-08-12 12:44:17.0
 -0300
 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
  # Some misc functions..  for 2.2 and beyond.
  # by: Ian Frechette  (frech...@spot.colorado.edu)
  # Wed Aug 18 00:26:53 MDT 1993
 -@ RCS.functions = [$$Header: /local/cvs/ircii/script/functions,v 1.3
 2001/08/12 15:44:17 mrg Exp $$]
 +@ RCS.functions = [$$Header: /home/cvs/ircii/script/functions,v 1.3
 2001/08/12 15:44:17 mrg Exp $$]


  # ircII scripting note.  @ var = expression is used a lot. One case
 diff -Naur 1/ircii/script/history-match
 ircii-20140831/script/history-match
 --- 1/ircii/script/history-match2001-08-13 07:40:52.0
 -0300
 +++ ircii-20140831/script/history-match 2001-08-12 12:44:17.0
 -0300
 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
  # modify the pattern or hit return it will reset the search to something
  # new..

 -@ RCS.ircIId = [$$Header: /local/cvs/ircii/script/history-match,v 1.2
 2001/08/12 15:44:17 mrg Exp $$]
 +@ RCS.ircIId = [$$Header: /home/cvs/ircii/script/history-match,v 1.2
 2001/08/12 15:44:17 mrg Exp $$]

  bind meta2-p parse history.expn $L

 diff -Naur 1/ircii/script/imap ircii-20140831/script/imap
 --- 1/ircii/script/imap 2003-12-08 05:55:34.0 -0200
 +++ ircii-20140831/script/imap  2003-12-08 03:05:59.0 -0200
 @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
  ^set novice off
  ^set max_recursion 50

 -@ RCS.imap = [$$Header: /local/cvs/ircii/script/imap,v 1.5 2003/12/08
 05:05:59 mrg Exp $$]
 +@ RCS.imap = [$$Header: /home/cvs/ircii/script/imap,v 1.5 2003/12/08
 05:05:59 mrg Exp $$]
  eval @ map.mask = encode(*.)
  # @ map.str = [| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ]

 diff -Naur 1/ircii/script/newformat ircii-20140831/script/newformat
 --- 1/ircii/script/newformat2001-08-13 07:40:53.0 -0300
 +++ ircii-20140831/script/newformat 2001-08-12 12:44:17.0
 -0300
 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
  # formatting.


 -@ RCS.newformat = [$$Header: /local/cvs/ircii/script/newformat,v 1.3
 2001/08/12 15:44:17 mrg Exp $$]
 +@ RCS.newformat = [$$Header: /home/cvs/ircii/script/newformat,v 1.3
 2001/08/12 15:44:17 mrg Exp $$]
  # An operator command. ESC-t turns this option on and off.
  # It allows one to see users or not see them in a TRACE.
  # It also effects the output of STAT l
 -


 Do you changed the original source code?

 Your d/changelog hasn't any register about your changes. It has this text
 only:

 --
 ircii (20140831-1) unstable; urgency=low
   * New upstream release:
 - Closes: #655261, #747700)

  -- Denis Rodrigues Ferreira denis...@gmail.com  Fri, 5 Sep 2014
 13:03:50 +0100
 -


 Sorry, but I no longer intend to sponsor this package. Good lucky!

 Cheers,

 Eriberto



 2014-09-08 11:38 GMT-03:00 Denis Rodrigues denis...@gmail.com:
  Eriberto, did an new upload of ircII package with the changes.
 
  The dsc file can be found at:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ircii

Bug#747032: RFS: libjs-zxcvbn/1.0+dfsg.1-1

[Eriberto Mota]

tags 747032 pending
thanks



Hi Ben,

About your package, please:

1. d/changelog: remove the word 'bug'.

2. d/control: in short description there is an 'indent' signal.
Please, change to a simple dash. Do the same in d/copyright.

3. d/copyright: there are files licensing to other authors that not
Dropbox. Please, review carefully all files. As help, use 'grep
-sriA25 copyright *'.

4. Your package doesn't build in my machine. It stops showing '( cd
scripts  python build_frequency_lists.py )' in screen.

Thanks for your work.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-05-04 18:32 GMT-03:00 Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au:
 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: wishlist
 Control: tags 726171 + pending
 Control: block 726171 by -1

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package ‘libjs-zxcvbn’:

 Package name: libjs-zxcvbn
 Version : 1.0+dfsg.1-1
 Upstream Author : Dan Wheeler d...@dropbox.com
 URL : 
 https://tech.dropbox.com/2012/04/zxcvbn-realistic-password-strength-estimation/
 License : Expat
 Section : web

 It builds these binary packages:

 libjs-zxcvbn - realistic password strength estimation — JavaScript library

 You can get the package with ‘dget’:

 $ dget -x 
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libjs-zxcvbn/libjs-zxcvbn_1.0+dfsg.1-1.dsc

 More information about ‘zxcvbn’ can be obtained from
 URL:https://mentors.debian.net/package/libjs-zxcvbn
 and in the ITP bug report URL:http://bugs.debian.org/726171.

 --
  \“Spam will be a thing of the past in two years' time.” —Bill |
   `\ Gates, 2004-01-24 |
 _o__)  |
 Ben Finney b...@benfinney.id.au


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#751009: RFS: ppp-gatekeeper/0.1.0-201406111015-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

Hi Nigel,

Sorry but I was mistaken.m Your mentors page has several versions of
the package. I reviewed your package after a hard day and I caught an
old version. Can you upload a new version? I saw that you accepted
some considerations and I will need review all package again. Please,
fix the package and reupload.

Thanks for your work.

Cheers,

Eriberto

2014-09-07 9:53 GMT-03:00 Nigel Kukard nkuk...@lbsd.net:
 On 09/07/2014 04:12 AM, Eriberto Mota wrote:



 Hi Nigel,

 Please:

 1. d/changelog: you didn't put an ITP reference. Please, read it[1] to
 you see how to make an initial changelog.

 [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.en.html#changelog


 The d/changelog file only contains the following...
 **
 pp-gatekeeper (0.1.0-201406111015-1) unstable; urgency=low

   * Initial release. (Closes: #758696)

  -- Nigel Kukard nkuk...@lbsd.net  Thu, 04 Sep 2014 07:52:55 +
 **

 I modified this according to the reply in
 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751009#56

 Could you please clarify how this is incorrect so i can fix it?


 2. d/copyright:
  - You need to add the section 'Files: debian/*' because you can
 wish make a Debian revision without an upstream revision.


 Could you please clarify this. Upstream (me) already has a debian/
 directory, would these files not fall under the Files: * section currently
 in d/copyright?

 Do you want me to put the following section in regardless of the above?
 *
 Files: debian/*
 Copyright: 2014 Nigel Kukard
 License: GPL-3+
 *

  - The information in d/copyright is different from upstream code.
 There is a license file saying GPL-2. However, ppp-gatekeeper file
 says 2008-2014 GPL-3+.


 The file ppp-gatekeeper correctly states GPL-3+ , the d-copyright file
 correctly states GPL-3+, the upstream LICENSE file also states GPL-3+.

 Could you please clarify which file you are referring to?



 3. d/ppp-gatekeeper.dirs: remove etc/modprobe.d because
 d/ppp-gatekeeper.install will create it.


 I'll sort this out, thanks for pointing it out.



 4. d/ppp-gatekeeper.install: you are installing a file inside
 /etc/shorewall. However, shorewall is a suggestion, not a dependency.
 So, you must put contrib/start.shorewall in
 usr/share/docs/ppp-gatekeeper/examples and write a d/README.Debian to
 explain about how to use this file.


 I'll sort this out, thanks for pointing it out.



 5. d/rules:
  - override_dh_installdocs: don't install AUTHORS as docs. This
 information should be provided by d/copyright. I suggest to use
 d/ppp-gatekeeper.docs ($ man dh_installdocs).


 I already removed this from my last upload, as indicated by
 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751009#56 as it does not
 contain any useful information for a user.


  - override_dh_clean: I suggest to use d/clean ($ man dh_clean).


 Already fixed in the latest upload as indicated in
 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751009#56

  - You are creating/deleting a manpage.1 but the correct level is 8.


 I have corrected this, thank you very much for pointing it out.


 6. You have Lintian messages to solve:

 W: ppp-gatekeeper: new-package-should-close-itp-bug

 Already fixed as per above.

 E: ppp-gatekeeper: description-is-pkg-name PPP Gatekeeper


 Already fixed in latest upload, mentors lintian no longer shows this
 message.

 I: ppp-gatekeeper: extended-description-is-probably-too-short


 I already expanded the description. I'm not seeing this message on local or
 mentors, could you indicate where you are seeing it?

 -N


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#751009: RFS: ppp-gatekeeper/0.1.0-201406111015-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

Hi Nigel,

Your package appears good. We need some last changes to upload it.

2014-09-07 12:36 GMT-03:00 Nigel Kukard nkuk...@lbsd.net:
 Hi there Eriberto,

 No problem at all, I really do appreciate your time :)


Oh, thanks! I saw your work, applying the corrections pointed by all
people. So, I will try to help you to finish this package.

My new observations:

1. d/control: remove the name 'PPP Gatekeeper' from short description
because when anyone execute an 'apt-cache search', the package name
will be showed. Do an '$ apt-cache search a' and you will see that the
packages names aren't showed in short descriptions.

2. d/copyright:
- About your question, yes, you need split to 'Files: *' and
'Files: debian/*'. The Nigel upstream and Nigel packager can do
different works. Imagine you have your upstream program as 2001-2013
and a package did in 2005. However, you need fix some issues in
packaging. So, you will have an upstream code 2001-2013 and a
packaging 2005-2014 (in other words, your program isn't copyrighted
2014). You can see two examples here[1][2].

[1] 
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/v/volatility-profiles/unstable_copyright
[2] 
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/p/phpwebcounter-extra/unstable_copyright

- Other issue is that ppp-gatekeeper file says: Copyright (C)
2008-2014, Linux Based Systems Design. Your d/copyright say:
Copyright (C) 2010-2014, Linux Based Systems Design. Note that here
we have another issue: the upstream is Linux Based Systems Design and
the packager is  Nigel Kukard. They aren't the same person. So, we
have:

Files: *
Copyright: 2008-2014 Linux Based Systems Design
License: GPL-3+

Files: debian/*
Copyright: 2014 Nigel Kukard nkuk...@lbsd.net
License: GPL-3+

I always like to put a contact for upstream. So, I suggest it
(implement if you like this):

Files: *
Copyright: 2008-2014 Linux Based Systems Design,
by Nigel Kukard nkuk...@lbsd.net
License: GPL-3+

You can see an example here[3].

[3] 
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/c/core-network/unstable_copyright

3. ppp-gatekeeper.README.Debian: you wrote Shorewall is a recommended
package. Change from recommended to suggested.

4. As curiosity, why you says 'Source:
https://gitlab.devlabs.linuxassist.net/ppp-gatekeeper/ppp-gatekeeper'
in d/copyright but uses
'http://download.allworldit.org/ppp-gatekeeper' in d/watch?

5. You have a Lintian message to fix: 'P: ppp-gatekeeper:
maintainer-script-without-set-e postrm'.[4]

[4] https://lintian.debian.org/tags/maintainer-script-without-set-e.html

I need your last effort to be all right. :-)

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#746257: RFS: conman/0.2.7-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

tags 746257 moreinfo
thanks


Hi Yao-Po,

I will try help you with conman. Please:

1. d/control:
- In Build-Depends, change debhelper from 9.0.0 to 9.
- Please, create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can
use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to
d/control.
- Put 'Suggests' after 'Package' field.

2. d/copyright:
 - The file auxdir/install-sh is under MIT/X license.
 - I suggest you to put the GPL-3+ one time only in the
d/copyright file. You can see an example here[1].

[1] 
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/n/netmate/unstable_copyright

3. d/rules: remove these useless lines:

# -*- makefile -*-

# Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode.

4. You have a LIntian message:

I: conman source: unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright paragraph at line 5

5. Please, add to your d/rules:

export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wl,--as-needed

to fix this issue:

dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if
debian/conman/usr/bin/conman debian/conman/usr/sbin/conmand were not
linked against libnsl.so.1 (they use none of the library's symbols)

See more details here[2].

[2] https://wiki.debian.org/HardeningWalkthrough

Thanks for your work.

Cheers,

Eriberto

2014-04-28 11:52 GMT-03:00 Yao-Po Wang blue...@gmail.com:
 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: normal

 Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package conman

  Package name: conman
  Version : 0.2.7-1
  Upstream Author : Chris Dunlap chris.m.dun...@gmail.com
  URL : https://code.google.com/p/conman/
  License : GPL3
  Section : comm
  Programming Lang: C
  Description : ConMan: The Console Manager

 ConMan is a serial console management program designed to support a large
 number of console devices and simultaneous users.

 It builds those binary packages:

   conman - serial console management program.

 To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
 URL:

 http://mentors.debian.net/package/conman


 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

   dget -x 
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/conman/conman_0.2.7-1.dsc

 Regards,
  Yao-Po Wang

 --
 blue119/Yao-Po Wang


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140428145205.ga23...@ypwang-nb.ypwang.info



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#760198: RFS: ircii/20131230-1 [NMU]

[Eriberto]

Hi Denis,

I can see several Lintian messages at http://mentors.debian.net/package/ircii.

Please, fix it.

Eriberto

2014-09-05 17:02 GMT-03:00 Denis Rodrigues Ferreira denis...@gmail.com:

 Eriberto, did an new upload of ircII package. Not NMU ;-)

 The respective dsc file can be found at:
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ircii/ircii_20131230-1.dsc

 Tanks a lot!
 --
 Denis Rodrigues Ferreira
 PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0
 C879 5E41 1ED7 EE80 0F2E 7D0C DBDD 4D96 E41B D2D0


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#760065: RFS: kildclient/3.0.0-1 [new upstream version of package already in Debian]

[Eriberto Mota]

Uploaded. Thanks for your work.

Cheers,

Eriberto

2014-09-06 8:12 GMT-03:00 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI edua...@kalinowski.com.br:
 tags 760065 - moreinfo
 thanks

 On 08/31/2014 11:02 PM, Eriberto Mota wrote:
 1. d/changelog: add ACK for NMU. See details here[1].

 2. d/rules: please, update to new (reduced) format. Ask me if you have
 doubts. An example is here[2]. For details, see the 'dh' manpage.

 3. d/rules: add 'export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wl,--as-needed' to
 solve these warnings:

 I believe I have addressed all these issues, the update package remains
 at the same address:

 http://mentors.debian.net/package/kildclient

 or

 dget -x
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kildclient/kildclient_3.0.0-1.dsc

 --
 Due to a shortage of devoted followers, the production of great leaders
 has been discontinued.

 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
 edua...@kalinowski.com.br


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: https://lists.debian.org/540aec26.5090...@kalinowski.com.br



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#751609: RFS: dmaths/3.5.2.5+dfsg1-1 (new version of a package that is already in Debian)

[Eriberto Mota]

2014-09-06 14:34 GMT-03:00 Innocent De Marchi tangram.pe...@gmail.com:
 Hi Eriberto,


Hi Innocent,


 2. d/control:
 - Explain me why the package depends of writer and draw to work.


 Has no sense to install the package without these two programs. I don't know
 if I understand the question...


You put in long description It also allows you to use your favorite
drawing software and include graphs of functions into a document. So,
why install draw compulsorily as dependency? I am trying understand
the package. If using writer, will you need of the draw?


 - Please, create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can
 use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to
 d/control.


 I want to do this with all my packages, but now I have no time. I don't
 practice with Git and will need some time for me to update.


You can use SVN or CVS (or GIT). Sorry but it is an essential
condition for me. GitHub is simple and has several tutorials and
videos on Internet.


 5. After the build, there are two wrong independent license files in
 the package:

 usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/DmathsAddon/Fichiers/licence.odt
 usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/DmathsAddon/Fichiers/license.txt

 You must add an override_dh_install to d/rules to remove these files ($
 man dh):

 override_dh_install:
 dh_install
 rm -f
 $(CURDIR)/debian/libreoffice-dmaths/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/DmathsAddon/Fichiers/licence.odt
 rm -f
 $(CURDIR)/debian/libreoffice-dmaths/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/DmathsAddon/Fichiers/license.txt


 The dmaths has a menu with an option to see the file
 DmathsAddon/Fichiers/licence.odt
 If it is deleted, an error occurs when accessing the file. I've added a line
 to delete the file license.txt to repackage the sources
 (see README.source)


Ok. Please, add comments line in libreoffice-dmaths.lintian-overrides
to explain each issue. I think you will need two lines.


 6. Now, remove the 'extra-license' lines from Lintian override file.


 OK. Only the line for DmathsAddon/Fichiers/license.txt

Ok!

I saw several Lintian messages in your last upload. A new Lintian was
uploaded today to unstable. May it can help you too:
http://eriberto.pro.br/blog/?p=1289

Thanks for your work.

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#751009: RFS: ppp-gatekeeper/0.1.0-201406111015-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto Mota]

tags 751009 moreinfo
thanks


Hi Nigel,

Please:

1. d/changelog: you didn't put an ITP reference. Please, read it[1] to
you see how to make an initial changelog.

[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.en.html#changelog

2. d/copyright:
- You need to add the section 'Files: debian/*' because you can
wish make a Debian revision without an upstream revision.
- The information in d/copyright is different from upstream code.
There is a license file saying GPL-2. However, ppp-gatekeeper file
says 2008-2014 GPL-3+.

3. d/ppp-gatekeeper.dirs: remove etc/modprobe.d because
d/ppp-gatekeeper.install will create it.

4. d/ppp-gatekeeper.install: you are installing a file inside
/etc/shorewall. However, shorewall is a suggestion, not a dependency.
So, you must put contrib/start.shorewall in
usr/share/docs/ppp-gatekeeper/examples and write a d/README.Debian to
explain about how to use this file.

5. d/rules:
- override_dh_installdocs: don't install AUTHORS as docs. This
information should be provided by d/copyright. I suggest to use
d/ppp-gatekeeper.docs ($ man dh_installdocs).
- override_dh_clean: I suggest to use d/clean ($ man dh_clean).
- You are creating/deleting a manpage.1 but the correct level is 8.

6. You have Lintian messages to solve:

W: ppp-gatekeeper: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
E: ppp-gatekeeper: description-is-pkg-name PPP Gatekeeper
I: ppp-gatekeeper: extended-description-is-probably-too-short

Thanks for your work.

Cheers,

Eriberto



2014-09-04 5:07 GMT-03:00 Nigel Kukard nkuk...@lbsd.net:
 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: wishlist

 Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package ppp-gatekeeper

 Package name: ppp-gatekeeper
 Version : 0.1.0-201406111015-1
 Upstream Author : Nigel Kukard nkuk...@lbsd.net
 URL :
 http://gitlab.devlabs.linuxassist.net/ppp-gatekeeper/ppp-gatekeeper
 License : GPL-3+
 Section : net

 It builds this noarch package:

   ppp-gatekeeper - PPP Gatekeeper manages balancing, redundant and failover
 PPP link

 To access further information about this package, please visit the following
 URL:

 http://mentors.debian.net/package/ppp-gatekeeper

 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

   dget -x
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/ppp-gatekeeper/ppp-gatekeeper_0.1.0-201406111015-1.dsc

 Changes since the last upload:
   * Correctly use d-clean
   * Fix description length
   * Removed authors  todo files from install
   * Only 1 item in changelog now
   * Fixed format of changelog
   * Remove log files on purge

 Regards,
 Nigel Kukar


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: https://lists.debian.org/sig.1324cfc6c2.54081ddb@lbsd.net



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#741648: RFS: cbootimage/1.2-2

[Eriberto Mota]

2014-09-04 18:15 GMT-03:00 Marc Dietrich marvi...@gmx.de:
 Hi Eriberto,


Hi Marc,

 3. d/control: you need a VCS to control your packaging. I think that
 already told you about it. Ask me if you have doubt.

 Yes, I original got it wrong thinking it must be the upstream repo. Since I
 have no repo for the debian stuff (and I really don't like to create one) I
 just dropped it because it is neither mandatory nor recommended.


Not mandatory or recommended by policy. However, a good practice
commonly requested by all sponsors to allow the control of the code by
you or any external people. You must implement it.


 4. d/copyright: you need remake this file. A short example is that you
 didn't told about build/* directory. Please, read (really) about
 'copyright' here[1]. As a tip, if your main upstream is Nvidia, you
 can use a general reference to it. An example (not real for years
 range):

 Ah, I forgot to update it to the new paths. In fact, the files are copyrighted
 by different people from different companies, so I like to keep the current
 style of one copyright line per company. The NVIDIA copyright mostly comes
 from the buildsystem and their own boards.


You must review each file. Use 'grep -sriA25 copyright *' to help you.

I checked each file and FTP Master will do it too. I found several
issues. Some examples:

- There are several files copyrighted as 2012-2013, or 2012, or 2013
for CompuLab Ltd. You wrote 2012 only.
- I didn't saw copyrights for Toradex in your file.
- 2011-2013 for Avionic Design GmbH. You wrote 2013 only.
- Other issues.

Please, change tegra*/compulab/* for two blocks: tegra20/compulab/*
and tegra30/compulab/*:

Files: tegra20/compulab/*
Copyright: xyz
License: abc

Files: tegra30/compulab/*
Copyright: xyz
License: abc

Do the same to tegra*/toradex/* and tegra*/avionic-design/*. It will
avoid confusion and make easier a future upgrade.

The 'Files: tegra*/nvidia/* build/*' must be 'Files: *'.

Finally, please, INSPECT all files. It will make my work easier.

 5. d/docs: you is installing ALL files as documents. No! There is one
 document only: README.txt. The other files are your program.

 These files are not really required for cbootimage to run. They are more like
 examples on how to write a configuration. They even have their own buildsystem
 so the user needs to copy them to his own directory to actually use them. As
 the whole package only contains examples, they can go directly into docs
 (without docs/example) [2]. The user feeds the path to the generated config
 file to the cbootimage program. You can see it as a configuration compiler.

 [2] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s12.6


Ok. I understood now. But your d/control don't explain about it. So
you must adapt the long description.

You are putting files as build.sh and Makefile. They aren't examples.
So, you must remove these files or put all files in /usr/share/[...]
(it is usual in Debian). In this case, you can write an
d/README.Debian to explain about the files in /usr/share.

Note that the current package is generating this Lintian message:

X: cbootimage-configs: duplicate-files
usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra114/nvidia/dalmore/build.sh
usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra124/nvidia/jetson-tk1/build.sh
usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra124/nvidia/venice2/build.sh
usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra20/avionic-design/medcom-wide/build.sh
usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra20/avionic-design/plutux/build.sh
usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra20/avionic-design/tec/build.sh
usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra20/compulab/trimslice/build.sh
usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra20/nvidia/harmony/build.sh
usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra20/nvidia/seaboard/build.sh
usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra20/nvidia/ventana/build.sh
usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra20/nvidia/whistler/build.sh
usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra20/toradex/colibri-t20/build.sh
usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra30/avionic-design/tec-ng/build.sh
usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra30/nvidia/beaver/build.sh
usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra30/nvidia/cardhu/build.sh
usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra30/toradex/colibri_t30/build.sh

If you use the /usr/share/cbootimage-configs, the message will stop.

I read quickly the README.txt and I saw that cbootimage will need of
extracted files from NVidia hardware, right? If yes, I think that
NVidia hardware content isn't free. So, if confirmed, cbootimage must
be put in 'contrib'.[1]

[1] https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages#note

 6. d/rules: your rules has useless comments and is wrong. But your
 package is building documents only. So, I can't comment about d/rules
 yet. You need read about the upstream program (where put it). I think
 that you need all cfg files in /usr/share/cbootimage-configs to make a
 link from cbootimage.

 see above.


You needn't of the 'export DH_OPTIONS'.


Please, reply to all (I

Bug#756034: Bug#747700: ircii

[Eriberto Mota]

Denis, you must use the #760198 (RFS) bug to ask, not #747700 (New
upstream version 20131230).

Denis, do you saw the message from Vincent Cheng saying about not use
NMU in this package?

I didn't found any new ircii package in mentors.d.o.

Eriberto


2014-09-05 8:28 GMT-03:00 Denis Rodrigues Ferreira denis...@gmail.com:
 Hi, Eriberto!
 I uploaded the package as NMU.
 Is the correct or should I make any changes in the package ircII?

 Thank you very much!
 --
 Denis Rodrigues Ferreira
 PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0
 C879 5E41 1ED7 EE80 0F2E 7D0C DBDD 4D96 E41B D2D0


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#741648: RFS: cbootimage/1.2-2

[Eriberto]

Hi Paul,

2014-09-05 11:52 GMT-03:00 Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org:
 Not mandatory or recommended by policy. However, a good practice
 commonly requested by all sponsors to allow the control of the code by
 you or any external people. You must implement it.

 Just to be sure, I read this as You must implement it if you want me
 [Eriberto Mota] to sponsor this package. Although I agree that it is
 common practice, I really think the must in general is out of place.


Currently, I meant was must. Please, don't understand it as an
agressive act. However, I think it (VCS) is important and necessary.


 You must review each file. Use 'grep -sriA25 copyright *' to help you.

 Or run licensecheck (check the man page).


You are right. But I always indicate grep because I already saw
licensecheck hide some information. Maybe I need know as use it
better. But grep will show all license text and the aditional names
after the license.


 Paul

Thanks Paul!

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#744823: RFS: gnuais/0.3.0-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

2014-09-03 11:24 GMT-03:00 Ruben Undheim ruben.undh...@gmail.com:
 Hi Eriberto,


Hi!!!


 Sorry, but I need you review each file. As an example, Everaldo Canuto
 hasn't copyright over src/gui/osm-utils.h, src/gui/osm-gps-map-ais.c
 and src/gui/osm-gpsmap-ais.h. There is a other case. I didn't see the
 name Matti Aarnio in copyright. Use 'grep -sriA30 copyright *' to
 search. Thanks!


 I made yet another attempt and uploaded. I'm not sure if I understand fully.
 Do I also have to split up the * target if not every copyright holder
 listed holds the copyright for every single other file?


No! You did right now. Very, very good.


 I just did the same change to the /usr/local/share/... path as for
 /usr/share/. I agree that
 it is unnecessary, but I don't see that it could cause any problems
 since the program tries
 to open the files with READ permission.
 I have updated the patch so that it only changes /usr/share/..


Following the FHS, a package can't install or modify anything in
/usr/local. So, you must keep the original ways to /usr/local. I also
suggest don't put anything in /usr/local as upstream. The /usr/local
is reserved to local admin/users and local programs only.


 Ok. There are cases that you need a text in menu. You can keep it .
 But I think that it is uncommon. Maybe you can use a script to start
 gnuais and gnuaisgui via menu. What you think about it?


 I think it's a good idea. But since I'm the main upstream contributor,
 I believe I will attempt to make this a bit more user-friendly in the
 next version (that gnuais is automatically started in the background
 by gnuaisgui if not already running).

Ok. IMHO, if the GUI starts the gnuais, it is another reason to don't
create an entry in menu. I think that we need prevent an unnecessary
menu pollution.


 Thanks a lot,

 Ruben

Your package is ok for me now. Uploaded.

Thanks a lot for your work.

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#744823: RFS: gnuais/0.3.0-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

A forgot detail: I would like to suggest you to add a GPG signature
for your upstream code in next release. To see more details, '$ man
uscan' (search for pgpsigurlmangle). To sign your tarball, you can use
'gpg -ab tarball_name'.

Cheers,

Eriberto

2014-09-03 11:24 GMT-03:00 Ruben Undheim ruben.undh...@gmail.com:
 Hi Eriberto,



 Sorry, but I need you review each file. As an example, Everaldo Canuto
 hasn't copyright over src/gui/osm-utils.h, src/gui/osm-gps-map-ais.c
 and src/gui/osm-gpsmap-ais.h. There is a other case. I didn't see the
 name Matti Aarnio in copyright. Use 'grep -sriA30 copyright *' to
 search. Thanks!


 I made yet another attempt and uploaded. I'm not sure if I understand fully.
 Do I also have to split up the * target if not every copyright holder
 listed holds the copyright for every single other file?



 Sorry. I will try to explain better. I saw in your patch:

 -   tmp_file =
 fopen(/usr/local/share/doc/gnuais/gnuais.conf-example,r);
 +   tmp_file =
 fopen(/usr/local/share/doc/gnuais/examples/gnuais.conf-example,r);

 -   ret =
 cpfile(conf_home_folder,/usr/local/share/doc/gnuais/gnuais.conf-example);
 +   ret =
 cpfile(conf_home_folder,/usr/local/share/doc/gnuais/examples/gnuais.conf-example);

 Now I know your intention. But, from FHS[1]:

 The /usr/local hierarchy is for use by the system administrator when
 installing software locally. It needs to be safe from being
 overwritten when the system software is updated.

 Your package can't touch in /usr/local. Then, the original upstream
 path must be kept because you can't create a /examples/ directory
 inside /usr/local. Therefore, this path will never exist.

 [1] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRLOCALLOCALHIERARCHY

 I just did the same change to the /usr/local/share/... path as for
 /usr/share/. I agree that
 it is unnecessary, but I don't see that it could cause any problems
 since the program tries
 to open the files with READ permission.
 I have updated the patch so that it only changes /usr/share/..




 Ok. There are cases that you need a text in menu. You can keep it .
 But I think that it is uncommon. Maybe you can use a script to start
 gnuais and gnuaisgui via menu. What you think about it?


 I think it's a good idea. But since I'm the main upstream contributor,
 I believe I will attempt to make this a bit more user-friendly in the
 next version (that gnuais is automatically started in the background
 by gnuaisgui if not already running).


 Thanks a lot,

 Ruben


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: 
 https://lists.debian.org/CA+ChNyVPX0Ec1e63hyn8n0+S75Cu-CvpanpxGv=z42qxjjq...@mail.gmail.com



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#752487: RFS: gcc-doc-defaults/5:10

[Eriberto Mota]

Hi Guo!

I uploaded your package now. Thanks a lot for your work.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-03 14:43 GMT-03:00 Guo Yixuan culu@gmail.com:
 Hi,

 On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org wrote:

 Hi! Thanks for your reply.

 2014-09-03 2:23 GMT-03:00 Guo Yixuan culu@gmail.com:
 
  2. If you are a DM, why you don't upload the package?
 
  Because there's a new binary package, gccgo-doc, it needs
  to go through new queue, so my upload is not allowed by
  ftp masters.

 Sure. I didn't see this new package before.

 I will wait for you.

 Cheers,

 Eriberto


 I've made some addition to debian/copyright and re-uploaded
 it.

 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/g/gcc-doc-defaults/gcc-doc-defaults_10.dsc

 The two new commits are:
 http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/yixuan-guest/gcc-doc-defaults.git/commit/?id=467470dd023aac5f05516806adbfe8691205550c
 and
 http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/yixuan-guest/gcc-doc-defaults.git/commit/?id=9ece1183abbd9318f7df5c4a67e4971a9ef0968c

 Cheers,
 Yixuan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#744823: RFS: gnuais/0.3.0-1 [ITP]

[Eriberto]

2014-09-02 18:09 GMT-03:00 Ruben Undheim ruben.undh...@gmail.com:

 3. I've gone through all Copyright-lines in all the files and I hope I
 have included all. However, after I put the licenses separately below,
 a few lintian information warnings appeared. I'm not sure what is best
 to do here.

 There are errors.

 [...]


 LGPL-2+ and GPL-2+ are ok. But, in your case,  you must put: Licese:
 GPL-2 or GPL-2+.

 I'll fix these things.


Sorry, but I need you review each file. As an example, Everaldo Canuto
hasn't copyright over src/gui/osm-utils.h, src/gui/osm-gps-map-ais.c
and src/gui/osm-gpsmap-ais.h. There is a other case. I didn't see the
name Matti Aarnio in copyright. Use 'grep -sriA30 copyright *' to
search. Thanks!


 4. NEWS removed. gnuais.conf-example installed by gnuais.examples.
 Patch added so that the program knows where to find the example
 configuration file since it is used as a template the first
 time gnuais runs. (01_conf_location.patch)


 No, you can't install/change files in /usr/local. Fix it.

 What do you mean? It does not install anything in /usr/local..
 When gnuais is started the first time, it copies  gnuais.conf-example
 into ~/.config/gnuais/gnuais.conf.
 Since gnuais.conf-example now is installed in
 /usr/share/doc/gnuais/examples instead of
 /usr/share/doc/gnuais/, the program needs to know this, and therefore
 the patch is needed.
 Maybe I have to be more precise in the patch-description.


Sorry. I will try to explain better. I saw in your patch:

-   tmp_file =
fopen(/usr/local/share/doc/gnuais/gnuais.conf-example,r);
+   tmp_file =
fopen(/usr/local/share/doc/gnuais/examples/gnuais.conf-example,r);

-   ret =
cpfile(conf_home_folder,/usr/local/share/doc/gnuais/gnuais.conf-example);
+   ret =
cpfile(conf_home_folder,/usr/local/share/doc/gnuais/examples/gnuais.conf-example);

Now I know your intention. But, from FHS[1]:

The /usr/local hierarchy is for use by the system administrator when
installing software locally. It needs to be safe from being
overwritten when the system software is updated.

Your package can't touch in /usr/local. Then, the original upstream
path must be kept because you can't create a /examples/ directory
inside /usr/local. Therefore, this path will never exist.

[1] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRLOCALLOCALHIERARCHY


 5. NEWS removed. OpenStreetMap is provided by libosmgpsmap which is in
 d/control. I haven't written a README.Debian file since I don't think
 there is anything special that applies for Debian users
 compared to other users.


 Are you sure about this? Please, see:

 $ dpkg -I ../gnuais_0.3.2-1_amd64.deb
 [...]
  Depends: libasound2 (= 1.0.16), libc6 (= 2.14), libcurl3 (=
 7.16.2), libmysqlclient18 (= 5.5.24+dfsg-1), libpulse0 (= 0.99.1)

 Not gnuais, but gnuaisgui.
 $ dpkg -I ../gnuaisgui_0.3.2-1_amd64.deb
 [...]
 Depends: gnuais (= 0.3.2-1), libc6 (= 2.7), libcairo2 (= 1.2.4),
 libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 (= 2.22.0), libglib2.0-0 (= 2.37.3), libgtk-3-0
 (= 3.0.0), libosmgpsmap-1.0-0 (= 1.0.1)


Sorry, I was mistaken. You are right. Thanks for explanation.


 6. I've added an icon for gnuaisgui. I have not added for gnuais since
 it is a command line utility only.


 So I think that no need a gnuais.menu file... Why put it in menu?

 gnuais must run in the background when gnuaisgui is used. It might be
 useful to have it available in the menu.
 The needs=text-option ensures that it starts in a shell. What is the
 intention with needs=text afterall if not having
 some console-programs available in the menu? I may of course remove it
 if it's preferable.


Ok. There are cases that you need a text in menu. You can keep it .
But I think that it is uncommon. Maybe you can use a script to start
gnuais and gnuaisgui via menu. What you think about it?


 10. I've gotten rid of the hardening-no-fortify-functions with 
 02_cflags.patch.
  The debian-watch-may-check-gpg-
 signature is still there. I hope
 I don't have to fix that one. I may look into that later.

 No. To solve it you will need a GPG signed file from upstream. We can
 upload with this Lintian. But I would like to suggest you to ask for
 upstream to add a GPG signature for next release. To see more details,
 '$ man uscan' (search for pgpsigurlmangle). To sign the tarball, the
 upstream can use 'gpg -ab tarball_name'.

 I will try to fix this, but it will take some time, I suppose.


Yes. As I said, we can upload this inicial version as-is.


 Thanks a lot!

 Regards,
 Ruben


You're welcome. I am glad to help.

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#752487: RFS: gcc-doc-defaults/5:10

[Eriberto Mota]

Hi! Thanks for your reply.

2014-09-03 2:23 GMT-03:00 Guo Yixuan culu@gmail.com:

 2. If you are a DM, why you don't upload the package?

 Because there's a new binary package, gccgo-doc, it needs
 to go through new queue, so my upload is not allowed by
 ftp masters.

Sure. I didn't see this new package before.

I will wait for you.

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#760257: RFS: plowshare4/1.0.5-1 -- file sharing tools

[Eriberto]

2014-09-03 5:36 GMT-03:00 Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org:

 Why would you need to wait until the package gets accepted through NEW
 and migrates to testing before sponsoring a newer version of this
 package? Assuming the package is ready for upload, you can go ahead
 and upload it to NEW now without any negative consequences.

Hi Vincent,

To be honest, it is new and strange for me, because my sponsors always
told me to wait. I really don't know as the queue woks. I saw that
isn't a FIFO because I already had a package accepted in the same day
of the upload, while other is waiting some weeks.

If I upload a new version, will there two versions in NEW. I already
did two uploads; -1 and, after, -2 to fix a license issue. Both
packages was processed. However, how works two different versions? I
will put this question in IRC too.

Thanks!

Cheers,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#760257: RFS: plowshare4/1.0.5-1 -- file sharing tools

[Eriberto]

Ok, two FTP-Master told me taht I can upload. From IRC now (Brazil, UTC-3):

[11:56] eriberto Hi. I have a package in NEW. Can I upload a package
with a new upstream version or I should avoid it? I think that is
better wait the package arrives to testing, but it was a question in a
talk with other DD. Thanks.
[11:57] ansgar eriberto: Just upload it.
[11:58] eriberto angar: What happens to the previous package?
[11:58] paultag it sits there
[11:59] paultag we just get it twice
[11:59] paultag If you want, you can add a -v1.0 and include the
changelog from the last upload
[11:59] paultag than we can reject it out
[11:59] paultag but that's not something people do often
[11:59] paultag and only if the v1 has freeness issues
[12:00] eriberto paultag: So, I should avoid it, right?
[12:00] paultag avoid what
[12:01] eriberto upload a new version freely, without major reasons.
[12:02] paultag You can do it, that's fine, people do that
[12:02] eriberto ok, thanks.


So Vincent is right.

Carl, I will to lunch now. I will see your package when I go back.

Thanks a lot Vincent!

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-03 11:03 GMT-03:00 Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br:
 2014-09-03 5:36 GMT-03:00 Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org:

 Why would you need to wait until the package gets accepted through NEW
 and migrates to testing before sponsoring a newer version of this
 package? Assuming the package is ready for upload, you can go ahead
 and upload it to NEW now without any negative consequences.

 Hi Vincent,

 To be honest, it is new and strange for me, because my sponsors always
 told me to wait. I really don't know as the queue woks. I saw that
 isn't a FIFO because I already had a package accepted in the same day
 of the upload, while other is waiting some weeks.

 If I upload a new version, will there two versions in NEW. I already
 did two uploads; -1 and, after, -2 to fix a license issue. Both
 packages was processed. However, how works two different versions? I
 will put this question in IRC too.

 Thanks!

 Cheers,

 Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#760257: RFS: plowshare4/1.0.5-1 -- file sharing tools

[Eriberto Mota]

Hi Carl,

I review your package. There are several Lintian messages
'executable-not-elf-or-script'. I will need that you fix it.

Please, confirm that you want the upload before the 1.0.4 version
arrives to unstable.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-09-02 0:54 GMT-03:00 Carl Suster c...@contraflo.ws:
 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: normal

 Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package plowshare4

   Package name: plowshare4
   Version : 1.0.5-1
   Upstream Author : Matthieu Crapet mcra...@gmail.com
   URL : https://code.google.com/p/plowshare/
   License : GPL-3+
   Section : web

 It builds those binary packages:

   plowshare4 - Download and upload files from file sharing websites

 To access further information about this package, please visit the
 following URL:

   http://mentors.debian.net/package/plowshare4

 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

   dget -x
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/plowshare4/plowshare4_1.0.5-1.dsc


 Changes since the last upload:

   plowshare4 (1.0.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium

 * New upstream release.
 * fix-man-page-typos.patch now fixed in upstream.
 * Drop Replaces: plowshare since it was never in the archive.
 * Drop Conflicts: plowshare3 since it was never in the archive.
 * Add Recommends: sxiv as an alternative X image viewer.
 * Add Suggests: fbi as a framebuffer viewer.

-- Carl Suster c...@contraflo.ws  Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:53:00 +1000

 Note that my package for the previous upstream release is sitting in NEW:

   https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/plowshare4_1.0.4-1.html

 I'm not sure if it's best to wait until that is accepted before
 attempting to upload this new release? If the package got bumped to the
 end of the queue then it probably won't have a chance of making it into
 testing before the jessie freeze, so it would be nice to avoid that.

 Cheers,
 Carl


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54053f7b.4090...@contraflo.ws



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#741648: RFS: cbootimage/1.2-2

[Eriberto Mota]

Hi Marc, how are you?

We need begin anew. So, I will analyse the packages from zero.

In a first moment, we will work over cbootimage-configs only. Please:

1. The g GIT commit was on 2014-08-06. So, the version must be
0.0+20140806~git18e531f (I prefer git instead 'g').

2. d/changelog: you need an ITP number.

3. d/control: you need a VCS to control your packaging. I think that
already told you about it. Ask me if you have doubt.

4. d/copyright: you need remake this file. A short example is that you
didn't told about build/* directory. Please, read (really) about
'copyright' here[1]. As a tip, if your main upstream is Nvidia, you
can use a general reference to it. An example (not real for years
range):

Files: *
Copyright: 2010-2014 NVIDIA CORPORATION i...@nvidia.com
License: ZLIB

After this, you must create new sections to exceptions only. This work
must be precise.I and FTP Master will check each detail.

[1] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/#fields

5. d/docs: you is installing ALL files as documents. No! There is one
document only: README.txt. The other files are your program.

6. d/rules: your rules has useless comments and is wrong. But your
package is building documents only. So, I can't comment about d/rules
yet. You need read about the upstream program (where put it). I think
that you need all cfg files in /usr/share/cbootimage-configs to make a
link from cbootimage.

7. d/watch is ok.

Cheers,

Eriberto

2014-09-03 8:09 GMT-03:00 Marc Dietrich marvi...@gmx.de:
 Hi Eriberto,

 Am Mittwoch 27 August 2014, 15:23:45 schrieb Eriberto:
 Hi Marc,

 2014-08-26 9:32 GMT-03:00 Marc Dietrich marvi...@gmx.de:
  I think you didn't undertand my words. You must create a VCS to
  control your packaging (debian directory). Not create a VCS to point
  to upstream code. The Vcs-Git field must use git:// instead https://.
  Your mistake was put the Vcs-* in binaries instead in source block
  (after Homepage field).
 
  This and the problems below are a result of how I package the source. Let
  me explain it at bit more: cbootimage is used to flash the bootloader on
  tegra devices. To do this, it needs some machine specific config files.
  These config files are not part of the cbootimage repository, instead
  they live under their own one. To avoid creating two source packages, I
  decided to include the config tree in the program tree. This is possible
  according to
  https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 (How to use multiple upstream
 
  tarball in 3.0 (quilt) format?). So I have two tarballs now:
cbootimage_1.4.orig.tar.gz and
cbootimage_1.4.orig-configs.tar.gz
 
  which create a binary and an platform independend package. So both
  packages
  need their own copyright (before cbootimage-1.0 didn't contain the config
  files).

 Ok. Thanks for your explanation. It is new for me. I read the texts
 and I tested all procedures. However, cbootimage-configs-1.4 doesn't
 exist in GitHub. So, you must use 0.0, the commit date and Git commit
 as version (or other similar format). An example for your case:
 0.0~git20140806.18e531. To see more examples: $ dpkg -l | grep -i git.

 I don't see a motive to join the upstream codes. IMHO, it is
 undesirable in this case, because the upstream source codes are being
 updated in different times. Thus, I think you must package each code
 separatelly and make cbootimage dependent of the cbootimage-configs. I
 have similar sittuation in my life. See my packages (phpwebcounter,
 phpwebcounter-extra) and (album, album-extra). So, I intent to sponsor
 your work if you use two packages.

 ok, I splitted the packages in two (cbootimage + cbootimage-configs) and
 uploaded them again to mentors.

 ...
  mmh, I'm about to install a jessie system in a vm to get a current
  lintian. I guess I can ignore the pedantic warnings for now?

 No. All Lintian messages must be fixed wherever possible.

 because cbootimage-configs has no version, I added the watch file with some
 comment that is makes no sense for this package (no releases) as described
 in the debian handbook.

 Hopefully, that's all ... Please take a (-nother) look at it again.

 Thanks!

 Marc



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org