Bug#268152: libtool path normalization bug (libffi.la: wrong libdir setting)

2012-05-16 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes: (resending to the correct bug. Sorry for the noise.) Hi, In 2004, Matthias Klose wrote: Goswin Brederlow writes: libffi.la has the following libdir: libdir='/usr/lib/../lib' That cuases libtool to add the rpath option when linking against the

Bug#673133: Fails for distributions that default to multiarch

2012-05-16 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: cdebootstrap Version: 0.5.8+b1 Severity: normal Ubuntu Precise amd64 defaults to multiarch with i386 as foreign architecture. This causes apt-get to look for a binary-i386/Packages file via the bootstrap method and cdebootstrap only provides the binary-amd64/Packages file. The simple

Bug#671934: ABI changes without SONAME change

2012-05-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com writes: On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de wrote: Package: libavformat53 Version: 6:0.8.2-1 Severity: normal After updating libavformat53 my mplayer suddenyl fails: mplayer: relocation error: mplayer: symbol

Bug#672282: udebs are build with the wrong version

2012-05-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: dpkg Version: 1.15.8.12 Severity: normal File: /usr/bin/dpkg-deb Hi, I'm building a backport of cdebootstrap for work and we automatically add +codename to the version of binary packages using dh_gencontrol -- -v$(VERSION) to make it clearer for what release a backport was build.

Bug#671934: ABI changes without SONAME change

2012-05-08 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: libavformat53 Version: 6:0.8.2-1 Severity: normal After updating libavformat53 my mplayer suddenyl fails: mplayer: relocation error: mplayer: symbol ff_codec_wav_tags, version LIBAVFORMAT_53 not defined in file libavformat.so.53 with link time reference Looks like libavformat has

Bug#495890: widelands: multiple mine upgrades leave you without master miner

2012-05-06 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: widelands Version: 1:17~rc2-3 Followup-For: Bug #495890 Hi, this bug applies to any building that needs an experienced worker. For another example when building a Metalworks while upgrading a Axfactory to a Warmill the Metalworks can steal the Masterblacksmith. In military buildings

Bug#671719: Carriers can deadlock stoping delivery and removal of goods

2012-05-06 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: widelands Version: 1:17~rc2-3 Severity: normal Hi, with buildings that produce goods it can happen that a good is produced and takes up the last place on the flag while a carrier is trying to deliver goods to the same flag. At that point the carrier can't deliver its goods and waits for

Bug#671720: economy options are ignored by some buildings

2012-05-06 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: widelands Version: 1:17~rc2-3 Severity: normal Hi, I've noticed that some buildings do stop producing goods when the goal set in the economy options is reached. But others do not. For example mines will happily dig and dig and dig for more coal no matter how much coal is already stored

Bug#671440: detect when just getting a new Packages file would be faster than the pdiffs

2012-05-04 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
jida...@jidanni.org writes: Package: apt Version: 0.9.2 Severity: wishlist Maybe there should be a mechanism to detect when just getting a fresh Packages file would be faster than all the pdiffs, seen here after returning from a one week vacation: No. Or rather the pdiff mechanism should

Bug#671302: Circular Build Dependencies

2012-05-04 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com writes: On May 3, 2012 10:20 AM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote: On May 3, 2012 9:30 AM, Pino Toscano p...@debian.org wrote: Alle giovedì 3 maggio 2012, Andres Mejia ha scritto: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Pino Toscano p...@debian.org wrote:

Bug#670954: [apt] MultiArch: apt-get -f install doesn't see correct dependency of package

2012-05-03 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Török Edwin edwin+ml-deb...@etorok.net writes: Package: apt Version: 0.9.2 Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- 'apt-get -f install' won't install libgcc1-dbg 4.7.0-6, although its available. For some reason it thinks that it depends on

Bug#670954: [apt] MultiArch: apt-get -f install doesn't see correct dependency of package

2012-05-03 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Török Edwin edwin+ml-deb...@etorok.net writes: On 05/03/2012 04:20 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Török Edwin edwin+ml-deb...@etorok.net writes: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/apt-listchanges, line 237, in module main() File /usr/bin/apt-listchanges, line 48

Bug#670322: apt: hiding foreign arch from APT::Architectures, using with [arch=] only, only partly works

2012-04-30 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Yann Dirson ydir...@free.fr writes: On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:12:42AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Yann Dirson ydir...@free.fr writes: Package: apt Version: 0.8.15.10 Severity: normal (found no changelog entry for 0.9.x looking like this problem) I have many sources.list

Bug#670322: apt: hiding foreign arch from APT::Architectures, using with [arch=] only, only partly works

2012-04-30 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Yann Dirson ydir...@free.fr writes: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 09:53:26PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:12:42AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Yann Dirson ydir...@free.fr writes: Package: apt Version: 0.8.15.10 Severity: normal (found no changelog

Bug#670868: create_RGB_surface ignores flags

2012-04-29 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: ocamlsdl Version: 0.8.0 Severity: important Hi, for purposes of blitting (copying) images with alpha channel I'm trying to create an RGBA surface without `SRCALPHA set (so the alpha channel is copied verbatim). But it seems the format flags are completly ignored: # let img3 =

Bug#670869: Missing binding for SDL_ConvertSurface

2012-04-29 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: ocamlsdl Version: 0.8.0 Severity: normal Hi, it seems the binding for /** * Creates a new surface of the specified format, and then copies and maps * the given surface to it so the blit of the converted surface will be as * fast as possible. If this function fails, it returns

Bug#664257: multiarch tuples are not documented/defined

2012-04-27 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes: Goswin von Brederlow writes (Re: Bug#664257: multiarch tuples are not documented/defined): It is a bug in Debian: The multiarch tuples are not documented/defined in Debian. They are now documented on the wiki, as previously noted

Bug#670577: ITP: morse -- Multi-OpenRobot Simulation Engine

2012-04-27 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org writes: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org * Package name: morse Version : 0.5.1 Upstream Author : Laas * URL : http://morse.openrobots.org/ * License : BSD Programming

Bug#664257: multiarch tuples are not documented/defined

2012-04-26 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes: Goswin von Brederlow writes (Re: Bug#664257: multiarch tuples are not documented/defined): Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes: What change to the Debian operating system, or to processes, documents, infrastructure

Bug#670322: apt: hiding foreign arch from APT::Architectures, using with [arch=] only, only partly works

2012-04-25 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Yann Dirson ydir...@free.fr writes: Package: apt Version: 0.8.15.10 Severity: normal (found no changelog entry for 0.9.x looking like this problem) I have many sources.list entries, and only want selected ones to take armel packages into account. The new [arch=] tag seems tailored for

Bug#664257: multiarch tuples are not documented/defined

2012-04-25 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes: Matthias Klose writes (Bug#664257: multiarch tuples are not documented/defined): On 18.04.2012 05:16, Jonathan Nieder wrote: I think the Multiarch/Tuples wiki page is now in a sane state, though as always it could presumably be improved

Bug#666940: Grub doesn't like raid1 with 3 drives: error: superfluous RAID member (3 found).

2012-04-02 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: grub-pc Version: 1.99-18 Severity: normal As the subject says grub doesn't like a raid1 with 3 drives: Setting up grub2-common (1.99-18) ... Setting up grub-pc-bin (1.99-18) ... Setting up grub-pc (1.99-18) ... error: superfluous RAID member (3 found). error: superfluous RAID member (3

Bug#664257: multiarch tuples are not documented/defined

2012-03-22 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org writes: On 21.03.2012 11:26, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Matthias Klosed...@debian.org writes: On 19.03.2012 15:34, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Did you read the wiki page? Yes. Is the kind of information on which calling convention

Bug#664257: multiarch tuples are not documented/defined

2012-03-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org writes: On 19.03.2012 15:34, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Did you read the wiki page? Yes. Is the kind of information on which calling convention, basic system library structures, and so on form the ABI for a given tuple that I

Bug#664884: RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0.1-1

2012-03-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libaio-ocaml * Package name: libaio-ocaml Version : 1.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Goswin von Brederlow * URL : http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ocaml

Bug#664257: multiarch tuples are not documented/defined

2012-03-19 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes: Matthias Klose wrote: While we strive to get multiarch ready for squeeze, there is currently nothing to point to what the multiarch tuples actually mean, neither on the Debian side nor on some kind of standards side like the FHS or LSB. This has

Bug#663520: Support for incremental updates, bigarrays and multithreading

2012-03-16 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
for strings. Author: Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de Last-Update: 2012-03-16 --- Index: ocaml-sha-1.7/sha1.mli === --- ocaml-sha-1.7.orig/sha1.mli 2012-03-16 18:00:06.0 +0100 +++ ocaml-sha-1.7/sha1.mli 2012-03-16 18:30

Bug#664213: Please preserve the order of attachements

2012-03-16 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
=goswin-...@web.de INTERFACE=text ** /home/mrvn/.reportbugrc: reportbug_version 1.99.31 mode expert ui text realname Goswin von Brederlow email goswin-...@web.de no-cc header X-Debbugs-CC: goswin-...@web.de -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500

Bug#663520: Update: Support for incremental updates, bigarrays and multithreading

2012-03-12 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
to run concurrently while the sha checksum is being computed. Author: Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de Last-Update: 2012-03-12 --- Index: ocaml-sha-1.7/sha1_stubs.c === --- ocaml-sha-1.7.orig/sha1_stubs.c 2012-03-11 22:29

Bug#663500: Do not include .pc subdirs during build

2012-03-11 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: ocaml-extunix Version: 0.0.3-2 Severity: wishlist Hi, after creating patches to add bindings for posix_memalign I see the following in the build log: ... ocaml setup.ml -doc I: Building documentation 'api' I: Running command '/usr/bin/ocamlbuild src//api.docdir/index.html -tag debug'

Bug#663520: Support for incremental updates, bigarrays and multithreading

2012-03-11 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
holding the global lock and the file function is also changed to run without the global lock. This enables other threads to run concurrently while the sha checksum is being computed. Author: Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de Last-Update: 2012-03-11 --- Index: ocaml-sha-1.7/sha1_stubs.c

Bug#663180: Provides no zero value

2012-03-10 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
David MENTRE dmen...@linux-france.org writes: Hello, 2012/3/9 Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de: I found myself in a situation where I needed to fill in a dummy Sha1.t into a record to initialize an array. I didn't want to use an Sha1.t option because the value is only every invalid

Bug#663180: Provides no zero value

2012-03-10 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Eric Cooper e...@cmu.edu writes: On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 02:00:58PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: David MENTRE dmen...@linux-france.org writes: Hello, 2012/3/9 Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de: I found myself in a situation where I needed to fill in a dummy Sha1.t

Bug#662632: RFS - libaio-ocaml 1.0-1

2012-03-10 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Hi, I've just uploaded libaio-ocaml_1.0-1_amd64.changes to mentors [1] and also taged it in git [2,3] as debian/1.0-1. The debian/rules file now has a release target that creates the orig tarball, imports it into the upstream branch and pristine-tar branch if needed and tags the release. I

Bug#663357: uscan: Please support scanning git repositories for tags

2012-03-10 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: devscripts Version: 2.11.2 Severity: wishlist File: /usr/bin/uscan Hi, I've seen that the uscan manpage contains an example for projects on github through a redirector. But my project is on git.debian.org and that doesn't have such a redirector. So that doesn't help. It would be nice

Bug#663180: Provides no zero value

2012-03-10 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
David MENTRE dmen...@linux-france.org writes: Hello, 2012/3/10 Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de: I can't because the Sha1.t is abstract. I think what David means is that  you can just define     let my_initializer = Sha1.string somewhere at the beginning of your code. Yes. let

Bug#663357: uscan: Please support scanning git repositories for tags

2012-03-10 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
James McCoy james...@debian.org writes: On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 05:52:53PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: I've seen that the uscan manpage contains an example for projects on github through a redirector. But my project is on git.debian.org and that doesn't have such a redirector. So

Bug#663180: Patch fix

2012-03-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
: Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de Last-Update: 2012-03-09 --- The information above should follow the Patch Tagging Guidelines, please checkout http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ to learn about the format. Here are templates for supplementary fields that you might want to add: Origin: vendor

Bug#520265: #520265: Missing architecture independent binary representation

2012-03-08 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
The 1.7 upstream version has to_bin : t - string -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#663179: Homepage dead, abandoned upstream?

2012-03-08 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: ocaml-sha Version: 1.7-2 Severity: normal Hi, the homepage listed in debian/control [1] gives 404 Not found. Following the links on [2] I didn't find ocaml-sha listed on the github page nor projects.snarg.org. Has this package been superseeded by something else? Has upstream lost

Bug#663180: Provides no zero value

2012-03-08 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
in situations where the proper digest can not be computed yet. . Technically a digest with all bits 0 is valid but the chance of it actually occuring is remote. Still, the value should be compared using physical equality. . TODO: should there be a 'val is_zero : t - bool'? Author: Goswin von

Bug#662632: RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1

2012-03-07 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
below pans out you will get your non-native package. Le 06/03/2012 10:36, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit : Even with a single repository I need to roll out a new orig.tar.gz for every upstream change or have to commit upstream changes to debian/patches/* every time I build a source package and send

Bug#662632: RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1

2012-03-07 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org writes: Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org writes: Goswin von Brederlow wrote: [...] The package is native because I am both maintainer and upstream author. Does a watch file make sense for a native package

Bug#662632: RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1

2012-03-07 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Stéphane Glondu glo...@debian.org writes: Le 07/03/2012 09:52, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit : That is what major, minor and subversions (x.y.z) are for. If I change only something in Debian I would not increment x or y and I would not create a new tarball for release on e.g. ocamlforge. I

Bug#662632: RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1

2012-03-07 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Stéphane Glondu glo...@debian.org writes: Le 07/03/2012 09:14, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit : With a moments thought I would have 3 branches: - master - upstream - pristine-tar All developement would happen in the master branch. Then before the Debian upload I would merge master

Bug#662632: RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1

2012-03-06 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
tags 662632 - moreinfo thanks Stéphane Glondu glo...@debian.org writes: Le 05/03/2012 12:33, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit : I am looking for a sponsor for my package libaio-ocaml I've looked at the git repository (037a448). It is written explicitly in [1]: Do not close RFS bugs

Bug#662763: ITP: libaio-ocaml -- OCaml bindings for libaio (Linux kernel AIO access library)

2012-03-06 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de Package name: libaio-ocaml Version : 1.0~rc3 Upstream Author : Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de URL : http://forge.ocamlcore.org/projects/libaio-ocaml/ Vcs-Git : git

Bug#662632: RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1

2012-03-06 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Benoit Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org writes: Hi Goswin, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org writes: Goswin von Brederlow wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package libaio-ocaml * Package name: libaio-ocaml Version : 1.0~rc1

Bug#662632: RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1

2012-03-05 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libaio-ocaml * Package name: libaio-ocaml Version : 1.0~rc1 Upstream Author : Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de

Bug#662632: RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1

2012-03-05 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org writes: retitle 662632 RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1 [ITP] -- OCaml bindings for libaio tags 662632 moreinfo thanks Hi Goswin, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package libaio-ocaml * Package name: libaio-ocaml

Bug#662080: ITP: hadori -- Hardlinks identical files

2012-03-04 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org writes: On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 07:00:13AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Timo Weingärtner t...@tiwe.de writes: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Package name: hadori Version: 0.2

Bug#661996: Missing Recommends: linux-tools

2012-03-03 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: linux-base Version: 3.4 Severity: normal Hi, linux-base contains /usr/bin/perf but running that gives: mrvn@frosties:~% perf /usr/bin/perf: line 24: exec: perf_3.1: not found E: linux-tools-3.1 is not installed. A Recommends: linux-tools would ensure that at least the perf_x.y for the

Bug#661998: version requirement too specific

2012-03-03 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: linux-tools-3.2 Version: 3.2.1-2 Severity: important Hi, running perf gives: mrvn@frosties:~% perf /usr/bin/perf: line 24: exec: perf_3.1: not found E: linux-tools-3.1 is not installed. But the linux-tools-3.1 package does no exist. There is only a linux-tools-3.2 package. On the

Bug#661998: closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Re: Bug#661998: version requirement too specific)

2012-03-03 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk Subject: Re: Bug#661998: version requirement too specific To: 661998-d...@bugs.debian.org Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 14:13:09 + On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 13:04 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: [...] So why is there such a close version requirement

Bug#661996: closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Re: Bug#661996: Missing Recommends: linux-tools)

2012-03-03 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
661996: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661996 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk Subject: Re: Bug#661996: Missing Recommends: linux-tools To: 661996-d...@bugs.debian.org Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012

Bug#662080: ITP: hadori -- Hardlinks identical files

2012-03-03 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Timo Weingärtner t...@tiwe.de writes: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Package name: hadori Version: 0.2 Upstream Author: Timo Weingärtner t...@tiwe.de URL: https://github.com/tiwe-de/hadori License: GPL3+

Bug#661580: mkfs.xfs fails to detect correct sector size

2012-03-01 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: xfsprogs Version: 3.1.7 Followup-For: Bug #661580 Hi again, I've patched the NBD driver to set the physical sector size. Was way easier than I imagined: -- --- linux/drivers/block/nbd.c~ 2012-03-01

Bug#661580: mkfs.xfs fails to detect correct sector size

2012-03-01 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org writes: On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 04:53:32AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: I'm asuming libblkid is used, otherwise a sectorsize of 512 would make no sense. It might be that NBD advertises the geometry wrong, as in ft.sectorsize isn't set correctly

Bug#661580: mkfs.xfs fails to detect correct sector size

2012-03-01 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org writes: On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:14:09AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: And I can confirm that the sector size detection is still broken in 3.1.7. That's a known bug that Carlos wanted to look into. If you really can't accept smaller I/O without

Bug#661580: mkfs.xfs fails to detect correct sector size

2012-02-29 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Eric Sandeen sand...@sandeen.net writes: On 2/28/12 3:11 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: Carlos, didn't you plan to look into this issue? Goswin, how do you determin that mkfs is still doing unaligned I/O when forcing the large sevtor size? Once we set the sector size XFS can't do I/O

Bug#661580: mkfs.xfs fails to detect correct sector size

2012-02-28 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org writes: Carlos, didn't you plan to look into this issue? Goswin, how do you determin that mkfs is still doing unaligned I/O when forcing the large sevtor size? Once we set the sector size XFS can't do I/O smaller than it. I'm writing a nbd-server that

Bug#661580: mkfs.xfs fails to detect correct sector size

2012-02-27 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: xfsprogs Version: 3.1.7 Severity: important File: /sbin/mkfs.xfs Hi, since I recently bought a harddisk with 4K sector size I've been checking for correct alignment and blocksizes in various things. One of them being xfs. When I partition the disk in parted it shows correctly to have a

Bug#657557: [PATCH] Alternate patch for missing long descriptions

2012-02-22 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
. And thanks for finally responding with more than wrong to support your case even if it doesn't explain why long description in the package db are neccessary or give an example what remains broken with just my patch. Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de (22/02/2012): Now my patch (attached

Bug#657557: [PATCH] Alternate patch for missing long descriptions

2012-02-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: www.debian.org Followup-For: Bug #657557 Hi, Cyril and I disagree about the cause for the missing description and the fix for it. So someone impartial please look over both out patches and see which makes more sense. In both cases the english translations must be added to ddtplangs

Bug#658278: ld.so segfaults on wrong input

2012-02-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes: severity 658278 wishlist tags 658278 + moreinfo quit Goswin von Brederlow wrote: It has a different interpreter in its elf section. Ld.so could check that to determine wether the elf file is one it should care about. A common use case

Bug#605090: Linux 3.2 in wheezy

2012-02-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org writes: On mer., 2012-02-01 at 10:34 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:24:40AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On mar., 2012-01-31 at 11:01 -0500, micah anderson wrote: What is stopping you from creating another package, that

Bug#647522: Please test gzip -9n - related to dpkg with multiarch support

2012-02-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl writes: On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 02:14:22PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: For those not subscribed to that bug, how to reproduce[1] and possible fix[2] are available now. There might be other places where buffers are reused, I only spent a few minutes on this

Bug#658352: 4k Advanced format

2012-02-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
shirish शिरीष shirisha...@gmail.com writes: at bottom :- On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 19:04, Thomas Schmitt scdbac...@gmx.net wrote: Hi, snipped Getting a little sideways here :- I am clueless enough to look into wikipedia about GUID Partition Table. The is room for a Protective

Bug#658278: ld.so segfaults on wrong input

2012-02-08 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
reopen 658278 thanks Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes: On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 07:47:29PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Package: libc6 Version: 2.13-21 Severity: normal File: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 Running ld.so with the wrong kind of file segfaults: mrvn@frosties

Bug#658278: ld.so segfaults on wrong input

2012-02-01 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: libc6 Version: 2.13-21 Severity: normal File: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 Running ld.so with the wrong kind of file segfaults: mrvn@frosties:~% /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /usr/lib/klibc/bin/ls zsh: segmentation fault /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /usr/lib/klibc/bin/ls MfG

Bug#657493: Requesting new mount option hidde

2012-01-26 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: util-linux Version: 2.20.1-1 Severity: wishlist Hi, when /etc/mtab is a file one can hide mountpoints by not listing them in /etc/mtab. Also some mountpoints listed in /etc/mtab were ignored by tools like df. Specifically bind mounts. With /etc/mtab being a symlink to /proc/mounts this

Bug#653073: bug#10363: /etc/mtab - /proc/mounts symlink affects df(1) output for

2012-01-19 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Paul Eggert egg...@cs.ucla.edu writes: On 01/18/12 06:25, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: What df should do is automatically skip the entries that are obscured or generally inaccessible. Isn't this missing some of the larger context? df is just doing what lots of other programs do: finding out

Bug#653073: bug#10363: /etc/mtab - /proc/mounts symlink affects df(1) output for

2012-01-19 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Jon Dowland j...@debian.org writes: On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 03:25:05PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: What df should do is automatically skip the entries that are obscured or generally inaccessible I disagree. It's quite conceivable for a user to accidentally mount two things over

Bug#653073: bug#10363: /etc/mtab - /proc/mounts symlink affects df(1) output for

2012-01-19 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org writes: On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Paul Eggert egg...@cs.ucla.edu writes: On 01/18/12 06:25, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: What df should do is automatically skip the entries that are obscured or generally inaccessible

Bug#653073: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#653073: bug#10363: /etc/mtab - /proc/mounts symlink affects df(1) output for

2012-01-19 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org writes: On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, Paul Eggert wrote: On 01/19/12 07:29, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: Note: there is no reason why the kernel could not return the mount information with shadowed paths removed in a separate procfs node, as that

Bug#653073: Switching /etc/mtab to /proc/mounts and removing /lib/init/rw

2012-01-19 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru writes: On 19.01.2012 19:09, Michael Tokarev wrote: On 18.01.2012 18:18, Roger Leigh wrote: clone 653073 -1 retitle -1 df: [patch] Please ignore rootfs in df output reassign -1 coreutils thanks On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 03:05:58PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow

Bug#653073: bug#10363: /etc/mtab - /proc/mounts symlink affects df(1) output for

2012-01-18 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Alan Curry pacman...@kosh.dhis.org writes: jida...@jidanni.org writes: Filesystem 1K-blocksUsed Available Use% Mounted on rootfs 1071468 287940 729100 29% /

Bug#614805: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#614805: ia32-libs: libgl1 searches in wrong dri directory

2012-01-05 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Mate Miklos mtm...@freemail.hu writes: On 2011. November 13., Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Mate Miklos mtm...@freemail.hu writes: Dear all, I think the search path problem is caused by the fact that ia32-libs ships mesa 7.7.1, which is very old. The current in unstable/testing is 7.11

Bug#650444: [new check] Multi-Arch: foreign with public shared libraries

2011-12-22 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes: tags 650444 + patch thanks * Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de, 2010-01-29, 16:11: 4) 'Multi-Arch: foreign' with public shared library The Multi-Arch: foreign specifically says that the package is a binary package and contains no public shared

Bug#652275: Guided partitioning should not offer separate /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions; leave that to manual partitioning

2011-12-22 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au writes: On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de wrote: PS: I myself like a seperate /usr but I wouldn't use it for my parents. I do want a seperate /var and /home for them though so they can't DOS the system by filling up their home

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

2011-12-22 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org writes: Hi! On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 13:43:19 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Roger Leigh wrote: I think an important point to consider is that /usr would not disappear. It could be replaced by a symlink for new installs. This would permit older installs to

Bug#652275: Guided partitioning should not offer separate /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions; leave that to manual partitioning

2011-12-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes: On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 07:32:35PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: On 16.12.2011 18:38, Joey Hess wrote: Christian PERRIER wrote: I'm inclined to follow this advice and would indeed propose that the atomic partman-auto recipe is kept, however without a

Bug#652275: Guided partitioning should not offer separate /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions; leave that to manual partitioning

2011-12-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes: Le samedi 17 décembre 2011 à 17:42 +0800, Thomas Goirand a écrit : I do recommend a separate /usr to anyone. It's *not* safe to say that, and I know many people that agree with me. To me, it has, and still is, the best choice. You have no rights to

Bug#652275: Guided partitioning should not offer separate /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions; leave that to manual partitioning

2011-12-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au writes: On Sun, 18 Dec 2011, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote: Doing this has many advantage. Like, if your laptop has to unexpectedly reboot (like when you inadvertently removed power cord when batteries were not plugged, which happens often in

Bug#652498: more info

2011-12-18 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
mrvn@storage:~% xorriso -outdev /dev/hda xorriso 0.5.6 : RockRidge filesystem manipulator, libburnia project. Drive current: -outdev '/dev/hda' Media current: DVD+R/DL Media status : is blank Media summary: 0 sessions, 0 data blocks, 0 data, 8152m free mrvn@storage:~% cat iso | xorriso -as

Bug#652498: FATAL : Cannot reserve track of 7932674048 bytes

2011-12-18 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Thomas Schmitt scdbac...@gmx.net writes: Hi, mrvn@storage:~% xorriso -outdev /dev/hda Media status : is blank Allegedly no impact. Did you always use the same medium or did you try several ones from that pack ? I tried 2. Didn't want to waste any more in case it actually did write

Bug#652498: FATAL : Cannot reserve track of 7932674048 bytes

2011-12-17 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: xorriso Version: 0.5.6.pl00-2 Severity: normal I tried to burn DVD+R/DL but it failed: % xorriso -as cdrecord -v dev=/dev/hda -eject big.fat.iso xorriso : UPDATE : Thank you for being patient. Working since 347 seconds. libburn : FATAL : Cannot reserve track of 7932674048 bytes xorriso

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

2011-12-16 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes: Zachary Harris zacharyhar...@hotmail.com writes: My understanding of the FHS would be that if a library is a dependency of a binary in /bin or /sbin, then such library belongs in /lib, not /usr/lib. (If for some reason the library is also desired in

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

2011-12-16 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes: On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:53:24PM -0500, Zachary Harris wrote: I could be wrong, but my (admittedly stereotyped) impression of the standard use cases is that if you've got someone who DOES want to mount /usr separately from / (e.g. over NFS or

Bug#651573: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#651573: ia32-libs: Please update libpulse0 in ia32-libs to 1.1

2011-12-10 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Reed Lipman rmlip...@gmail.com writes: Package: ia32-libs Version: 20111001 Severity: normal I was getting frequent crashes in wine playing Killing Floor. The backtrace had this line: 3 0x7c3d4f50 pa_memblock_acquire+0x8f() in libpulsecommon-0.9.21.so (0x1458e7a8) I replaced that

Bug#651542: Please document executable config files behaviour

2011-12-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: debhelper Version: 8.9.12 Severity: normal Hi, please describe the new executable config files feature in man 7 debhlper in the DEBHELPER CONFIG FILES section. MfG Goswin -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable')

Bug#651466: initramfs fails to start LVM half the time

2011-12-08 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: lvm2 Version: 2.02.88-1 Severity: important File: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-top/lvm2 Hi, I recently moved the system from harddisk to an USB stick for a NAS box. Now the problem seems to be that the USB stick takes rather long to be detected and the partition show up only

Bug#651468: Please support (ignore) bootwait/nobootwait options

2011-12-08 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: mount Version: 2.19.1-5 Severity: wishlist File: /bin/mount Hi, under Ubuntu two new options where introduced to the option field in /etc/fstab: bootwait and nobootwait. The bootwait option marks filesystems that need to be checked and mounted before the boot conitnues ($local_fs and

Bug#650445: [new check] Multi-Arch: same with files outside multiarch dirs

2011-12-04 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes: Specificaly conffiles will pose a problem here I think. The conffile will belong to multiple packages then causing the first problem for dpkg. Then on conffile changes the change will happen multiple times, once per architecture and the changes made by the

Bug#650407: fixing multiply-used blocks takes forever

2011-11-29 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: e2fsprogs Version: 1.42~WIP-2011-11-20-1 Severity: normal File: /sbin/e2fsck Hi, I had a filesystem with lots of errors, among them multiply-used blocks. fsck.ext4 run fine and detected 179 inodes with multiply-used blocks but then it started to clone files to fix those inodes. Every

Bug#650415: Please check the grub.cfg for syntax changes on upgrade

2011-11-29 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: grub-pc Version: 1.99-14 Severity: normal Hi, I've upgraded grub and everything fell apart. So while trying to repair things I noticed that some things have changed in the grub.cfg since I last modified my manual entries. For example: search --fs-uuid --set

Bug#650425: Please add options to set the port range for nfs clients

2011-11-29 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: nfs-common Version: 1:1.2.5-2 Severity: normal Today when I booted one of the NFS mounts used port 873, which is the port used for rsyncd. This then caused errors from inetd because it could not use that port for rsyncd. From nfs(5) I see that one can set a port range to be used by nfs

Bug#650113: core.img has grown too much?

2011-11-27 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org writes: On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 06:19:39PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: My disks are still partitioned with the old alignment to CHS so there embedding area is small. But not unusually so: mrvn@frosties:~% ls -l /boot/grub/core.img -rw-r--r-- 1 root

Bug#650108: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man2/io_getevents.2.gz', which is also in package manpages-dev 3.25-1

2011-11-26 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: libaio-dev Version: 0.3.107-7 Severity: important Hi, upgrading libaio-dev fails with: Preparing to replace libaio-dev 0.3.107-7 (using .../libaio-dev_0.3.109-2_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libaio-dev ... dpkg: error processing

Bug#650113: core.img has grown too much?

2011-11-26 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: grub-pc Version: 1.99-14 Severity: important Upgrading grub-pc gives the following error: /usr/sbin/grub-setup: warn: Your embedding area is unusually small. core.img won't fit in it.. /usr/sbin/grub-setup: error: embedding is not possible, but this is required when the root device

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >