On Mon, 8 May 2023 at 14:57, Diederik de Haas wrote:
>
> On Monday, 8 May 2023 14:08:14 CEST James Addison wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 May 2023 11:18:03 +0100, James Addison
> > wrote:
> > > > Diederik de Haas (2023-04-30):
> > > > > And that's exa
Package: firmware-brcm80211
Followup-For: Bug #999485
X-Debbugs-Cc: gw...@gwolf.org, didi.deb...@cknow.org, 1023...@bugs.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
> There is now a license available for the brcmfmac43456 firmware: it's included
> in the relevant RPF package metadata, in the usual copyright
Followup-For: Bug #1035878
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/5462
Package: raspi-firmware
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I've installed a RPi 400 system using a regular build of Debian Installer
(bookworm RC2), and have begun using the official RPi firmware (as distributed
in the 'raspi-firmware' bookworm package - including bootcode.bin) to start the
the
Followup-For: Bug #1035878
Control: reassign -1 linux-image-6.1.0-8-arm64
The RPi team suggested that this is likely to be a Linux kernel issue, and I've
tested an updated v6.1.21 kernel build of theirs (including the likely fix[1])
that does resolve the problem.
[1] -
checks can be
problematic
* places comparison constants on the lhs for safety
I'll post test results when they are available.
Cheers,
James
Description: Request an rlimit-determined stack size from V8
Author: James Addison
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1030284
--- /dev/null
+++ nodejs
Followup-For: Bug #1030284
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
Hmm.. although the build itself succeeded, there was a unit test failure that
appears related to the change:
not ok 3213 sequential/test-fs-stat-sync-overflow
---
duration_ms: 1.111
severity: fail
exitcode: 1
stack: |-
On Sat, 13 May 2023 at 02:18, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> James Addison dixit:
>
> >I'm going to stay involved with this thread, but I think that it is
> >upon you to develop or provide further guidance towards a patch if
> >it's something you'd like to have implemente
Followup-For: Bug #1030545
X-Debbugs-Cc: ben...@debian.org, dipak.zo...@ibm.com
Hi Hilko (plus Dipak, fix author on cc for awareness),
Debian kernel package 5.10.179-1 that includes a fix for this has been accepted
into the stable-security (bullseye-security) suite today, and should resolve
this
Followup-For: Bug #1030284
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
It does seem to (continue to) function, at least on x86:
~/dygraphs-2.2.0$ NODE_PATH=/usr/share/nodejs
../nodejs-18.13.0+dfsg1/out/Release/node /usr/bin/babeljs --config-file
$PWD/babel.config.json --compact false --source-maps inline
Followup-For: Bug #1030284
I decline to participate further with this bugreport, although others are
welcome to pick up from the patches I've submitted (please don't merge them
as-is; modify them to apply corrections).
On Sat, 13 May 2023 at 12:15, James Addison wrote:
>
> On Sat, 13 May 2023 at 11:14, James Addison wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 13 May 2023 at 02:18, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > >
> > > James Addison dixit:
> > >
> > > >I'm going to stay invo
On Sat, 13 May 2023 at 11:14, James Addison wrote:
>
> On Sat, 13 May 2023 at 02:18, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> >
> > James Addison dixit:
> >
> > >I'm going to stay involved with this thread, but I think that it is
> > >upon you to develop or provide fur
On Fri, 12 May 2023 at 16:54, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> Yes, but given the usual ulimit, the new limit would be 4+ times
> the old one, much much harder to reach.
That does sound promising.
I've followed up on this discussion with the relevant upstream NodeJS
thread, and beyond there to the
On Fri, 12 May 2023 at 23:23, James Addison wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 May 2023 at 16:54, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> >
> > Yes, but given the usual ulimit, the new limit would be 4+ times
> > the old one, much much harder to reach.
>
> That does sound promising.
>
>
Package: e2fsprogs
Followup-For: Bug #1035543
X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@debian.org, bi...@debian.org
I'm having trouble reconciling these two log lines during the upgrade without
systemd:
ls: cannot access '/etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants': No such file
or directory
...
ting systems on the same machine, other than to
mention that I do think it's highly compatible and that that's
something that maintainers, developers and users care about.
> On 2023.05.03 17:29, James Addison wrote:
> >* Perhaps Devicetree is a better default in EDK2 for ARM systems?
> > (
On Wed, 3 May 2023 at 16:49, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> James Addison (2023-05-03):
> > After editing and rebuilding the Device Tree (DTS) files, and
> > deploying those changes to the system, I can confirm that adjusting
> > the 'model' field value in there has no effec
On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 02:43, Andres Salomon wrote:
>
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2023 11:04:15 + James Addison
> wrote:
> > Package: nodejs
> > Followup-For: Bug #1030284
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@debian.org
> >
> > Guidance received from the V8 project (
On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 23:54, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> James Addison dixit:
>
> >On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 02:43, Andres Salomon wrote:
>
> >> For ARM64, he says that raising the stack limit is not safe for v8
> >> *embedded inside WebView*, and therefore
Control: retitle -1 hw-detect: firmware file path handling is fragile
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 src:linux
Control: retitle -2 brcmfmac: firmware filename inconsistency with
linux-firmware.git
On Wed, 3 May 2023 at 00:34, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> James Addison (2023
Source: firmware-nonfree
Followup-For: Bug #1035505
X-Debbugs-Cc: didi.deb...@cknow.org, 1029...@bugs.debian.org, k...@debian.org
Looks like a silently-handled exception here:
Source: firmware-nonfree
Followup-For: Bug #1035505
X-Debbugs-Cc: didi.deb...@cknow.org, 1029...@bugs.debian.org, k...@debian.org
Hey Diederik,
I think that the edits to 'debian/config/brcm80211/defines' may be the cause
of the space-escaping issue (noticed that in your fork on Salsa).
Building
On Wed, 3 May 2023 at 04:03, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> James Addison (2023-05-01):
> > On Mon, 1 May 2023 at 17:53, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > I do see that guestfs-tools references[1] them, and I suppose other
> > downstream software could do as well. But within the insta
On Wed, 3 May 2023 at 03:02, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> James Addison (2023-05-03):
> > I think that the vendor name is coming from a DMI fallback:
> > https://sources.debian.org/src/linux/6.1.25-1/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/common.c/?hl=487#L4
Followup-For: Bug #1035505
X-Debbugs-Cc: didi.deb...@cknow.org, 1029...@bugs.debian.org, k...@debian.org
Yep, those two issues seem accurate to me: splitting the config file list (a
trickier prospect than it seemed it should be, because newlines have been
converted into spaces), and then quoting
Mystery may be (partially) solved. Responses inline below.
On Wed, 3 May 2023 at 15:17, Diederik de Haas wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 03:41:05 CEST James Addison wrote:
> > I think that the vendor name is coming from a DMI fallback:
> > ...
> > https://sources.deb
Followup-For: Bug #932957
X-Debbugs-Cc: hwans...@mailbox.org
Hi Holger,
> Please note the in the URL!
> I could not get this working with sphinx (if someone knows better, please
> contact me!)
Could the 'extlinks' feature[1] of Sphinx be helpful to migrate those?
(it allows defining URL
Followup-For: Bug #1059805
X-Debbugs-Cc: r...@debian.org, t...@libreoffice.org
PS: Reminded by a thread[1] on the RB mailing lists about potential issues
with SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH reader code, and from reading the relevant strtoul(3)
manual: the patch I provided lacks error-checking, and should be
Package: python-parsl-doc
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: hostname
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
I'm an occasional volunteer with the Reproducible Builds[1] project, and
recently noticed that
solve that by instructing the Sphinx autodoc extension to retain the
textual representation of argument lists as they are found in the source
code, instead of evaluated and repr'd equivalents.
Author: James Addison
---
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1063542
--- python-parsl-2023.11.13
Hi Étienne,
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 20:54, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> James Addison, on 2024-02-09:
> > When Sphinx builds documentation, by default it will emit a Python repr() of
> > the manager_config argument, causing the hostname of the build host to be
> > included.
Package: gitlab-cli
Version: 1:4.3.0-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@jp-hosting.net
Dear Maintainer,
The manual page for the python-gitlab CLI utility in the gitlab-cli binary
package contains a Python stacktrace within the 'description' section, instead
of the expected help content:
Source: lomiri-ui-toolkit
Followup-For: Bug #1060761
X-Debbugs-Cc: sunwea...@debian.org, mity...@debian.org
Hi Mike, Dmitry,
Is the second patch here (to disable the failing unit test) likely to be
uploaded to unstable in the nearish future?
I'm eager to see the results of some build
Package: thunderbird
Followup-For: Bug #1051551
X-Debbugs-Cc: alx.manpa...@gmail.com, c.schoen...@t-online.de
On Sat, 09 Sep 2023 19:16:32 +0200, Alex wrote:
> Since some recent version, every time I delete a mail, the list scrolls
> up a few messages, and I need to manually scroll down again,
Package: libpython3.12-dev
Version: 3.12.1-2
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream newcomer
Dear Maintainer,
Some of the C code contained within the headerfiles from libpython3.12-dev
appears not to be compliant with C90 standards (examples: [1][2]).
This contributed to a build failure[3] for the
Followup-For: Bug #1058959
Control: forwarded -1
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/python-quantities/-/merge_requests/1
Followup-For: Bug #1026381
X-Debbugs-Cc: la...@debian.org, reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: block -1 1057432
Control: close -1
Based on recent reproducible build testing history[1] of this package, and for
Debian versions after the fix for #1057432 became available (excludes
Followup-For: Bug #1010279
X-Debbugs-Cc: la...@debian.org, reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: block -1 1056291
Control: close -1
Based on recent reproducible build testing history[1] of this package, and for
Debian versions after the fix for #1056291 became available (excludes
Package: postgresql-16-postgis-3-scripts
Version: 3.4.1+dfsg-1
Severity: wishlist
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
Dear Maintainer,
I'm an occasional volunteer with the Reproducible Builds[1] project, and
noticed recently that the
Source: qtbase-opensource-src
Followup-For: Bug #1064053
Control: found -1
Control: found -1 5.12.2+dfsg-1
Replying to set the earliest version affected from the advisory blogpost[1],
and to (re)attach the patch from the duplicate bugreport.
[1]
Source: qtbase-opensource-src-gles
Followup-For: Bug #1064054
Control: found -1 5.12.2+dfsg-1
Control: tags -1 patch
diff --git a/src/gui/util/qktxhandler.cpp b/src/gui/util/qktxhandler.cpp
index 0d98e97453..6a79e55109 100644
--- a/src/gui/util/qktxhandler.cpp
+++ b/src/gui/util/qktxhandler.cpp
@@
Source: qtbase-opensource-src
Followup-For: Bug #1064056
Control: forcemerge 1064053 -1
Duplicate of #1064053; force merging this bugreport into that one.
Followup-For: Bug #1064052
Control: fixed -1 6.6.2+dfsg-1
Source: qtbase-opensource-src
Version: 5.15.10+dfsg-6
Severity: normal
Tags: patch security
Dear Maintainer,
Security advisory CVE-2024-25580, a buffer overflow affecting KTX image
handling in QT, has been announced[1], and the announcement includes patches
for various versions of QT including
Followup-For: Bug #1042955
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/sqlalchemyorg/zzzeeksphinx/issues/23
Followup-For: Bug #1058959
X-Debbugs-Cc: alexandre.deti...@gmail.com
Control: tags -1 pending
Followup-For: Bug #1064404
Control: forwarded -1 https://salsa.debian.org/debian/snapd/-/merge_requests/7
Control: tags -1 patch
Control: submitter -1 reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: user reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: usertag -1 timezone
Followup-For: Bug #1028125
X-Debbugs-Cc: r...@debian.org
Control: reassign -1 file
Control: affects -1 lintian
This filetype ambiguity seems to be reported by the 'file' command that
lintian invokes[1] to identify the file type for source files that it scans.
[1] -
Followup-For: Bug #1029555
X-Debbugs-Cc: rol...@debian.org
Control: close -1 lintian/2.117.0
Resolved in lintian 2.117.0 as uploaded to unstable (and has migrated to
testing / trixie).
Refs:
-
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/commit/2d5c8528f490edb1339fd0a65b3e503c32b2c366
-
Source: snapd
Version: 2.61.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
I'm an occasional volunteer with the Reproducible Builds[1] project, and
recently noticed that the snapd package failed automated reproducible build
testing[2] on Debian.
One cause of non-reproducibility for the package appears
Followup-For: Bug #1063724
Control: forwarded -1 https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/5666
Followup-For: Bug #1034867
Control: fixed -1 smplayer/23.6.0+ds0-1
Control: close -1
On Sat, 09 Dec 2023 22:18:12 + I wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 20:31:38 + I wrote:
> > The separate issue of mplayer breakage when using an invalid wid parameter
> > in
> > combination with the
Followup-For: Bug #1027988
Control: forwarded -1
https://gitlab.com/ubports/development/core/click/-/issues/6
Followup-For: Bug #738575
X-Debbugs-Cc: raykinsell...@gmail.com
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:47:40 +, James wrote:
> I've been thinking more about how to improve the chances that the
> package could be accepted into Debian -- my suggestion would be to
> rebuild it and upload it to the mentors[1]
Source: strace
Followup-For: Bug #896016
X-Debbugs-Cc: la...@debian.org, reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Looking at the Reproducible Builds build history[1] for strace on Debian,
all _successful_ builds I see between Y2019 and today, across all four
architectures listed (amd64, arm64,
Source: python-django-health-check
Followup-For: Bug #1026381
X-Debbugs-Cc: la...@debian.org, reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
I believe that this bug should disappear on build hosts that are using
dh-python version 6.20231204 or greater, where a fix for bug #1057432 means
that files
Source: paraview
Followup-For: Bug #983584
X-Debbugs-Cc: vagr...@reproducible-builds.org,
reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: fixed -1 paraview/5.11.0~rc1+dfsg-1
Control: close -1
The patch provided has been included into the Debian package; however note
also that the third party
Source: python-iso8601
Followup-For: Bug #1010279
X-Debbugs-Cc: la...@debian.org, reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>From some recent build results, it seems there is a '.hypothesis' directory
that is also created within the project's directory at build-time, so it would
also be worth
Source: strace
Followup-For: Bug #896016
X-Debbugs-Cc: la...@debian.org, reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: fixed -1 strace/4.26-0.1
Control: close -1
Source: burp
Followup-For: Bug #1057880
X-Debbugs-Cc: z...@debian.org, broo...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
Attached is a patch that includes the changes applied by Ubuntu[1] to remove
the problematic unit test version check from their source package.
For visibility, on cc are Shengjing Zhu (as
Source: geophar
Version: 18.10+dfsg1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: user -1 reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
I'm an occasional volunteer to the Reproducible Builds[0] project and
noticed that your
Package: qhelpgenerator-qt5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: randomness
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
I'm an occasional contributor to Debian's reproducible builds, and noticed
a recent
Followup-For: Bug #1059592
Description: helpgenerator: populate FileAttributeSetTable in sorted attribute
ID order.
Author: James Addison
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1059592
---
qttools-opensource-src-5.15.10.orig/src/assistant/qhelpgenerator/helpgenerator.cpp
+++
qttools-opensource
Source: burp
Followup-For: Bug #1057880
X-Debbugs-Cc: kapo...@melix.org
Thank you, Jérémy.
Source: burp
Version: 3.1.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@jp-hosting.net
Dear Maintainer,
The unit tests for 'burp' perform a version check[1] on zlib to decide[2]
between a choice of zip-related
Package: smplayer
Followup-For: Bug #1034867
On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 20:31:38 + I wrote:
> The separate issue of mplayer breakage when using an invalid wid parameter in
> combination with the nokeepaspect option still seems replicable to me using
> mplayer at version 1.5+svn38423-2+b1 -- a
Package: qhelpgenerator-qt5
Followup-For: Bug #1059592
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
Please note: it appears that a fix[1] that addresses this same problem is
already included in v6.5.0 of qttools.git upstream.
[1] - https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qttools/+/416699
Package: qhelpgenerator-qt5
Followup-For: Bug #1059631
X-Debbugs-Cc: mity...@debian.org
Control: forwarded -1 https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qttools/+/527972
Hi Dmitry,
On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 22:50:47, Dmitry wrote:
> Thank you for the patch!
>
> Any chance you can forward it to upstream
Package: qhelpgenerator-qt5
Followup-For: Bug #1059631
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 15:30:58, I wrote:
> Inspecting the patch from #875847 and the values that appear in the diffoscope
> output from the build logs: the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH value of the
the fact that
only the main.cpp code site was confirmed affected.
Description: helpgenerator: clear UTC offset to zero when reading
SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH value
Author: James Addison
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1059631
---
qttools-opensource-src-5.15.10.orig/src/assistant/help
Followup-For: Bug #1059631
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
> Control: forwarded -1 https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qttools/+/527972
This fix has been merged upstream; I've also offered what I think is a further
cleanup[1], but it does not affect the behaviour of the code (only readability
Package: qhelpgenerator-qt5
Version: 5.15.2-3
Severity: wishlist
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timezone
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
Looking at some recent Reproducible Build[1] test results[2] for the Debian
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 20:32, James Addison wrote:
>
> (with apologies for forgetting to cc Rene on my previous message)
>
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 19:45, James Addison wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 16:59, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> > >
> > > So
Source: clucene-core
Followup-For: Bug #1059805
X-Debbugs-Cc: r...@debian.org, thorsten.behr...@allotropia.de
On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 18:24:19 +0100, Rene wrote:
> LibreOffice created a patch to clucene to make their help pages
> reproducible. Maybe we should include it here? (libreoffice in Debian
>
Followup-For: Bug #1059917
I've reported the Makefile-dependency-graph issue upstream at:
https://github.com/Guake/guake/issues/2219
Source: guake
Version: 3.10-1
Severity: normal
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
I'm an occasional volunteer for the Reproducible Builds[0] project,
and recently noticed that the quake package failed to
Package: libreoffice-writer
Followup-For: Bug #974220
X-Debbugs-Cc: filh...@gmail.com, mariojos...@yahoo.com.br
Hi Claudio, Mario,
Do either of you have security software called warsaw installed, for example
to support internet banking?
There is an open bug[1] in the LibreOffice bugtracker
(with apologies for forgetting to cc Rene on my previous message)
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 19:45, James Addison wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 16:59, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> >
> > Source: clucene-core
> > Followup-For: Bug #1059805
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: r...@de
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 16:59, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
>
> Source: clucene-core
> Followup-For: Bug #1059805
> X-Debbugs-Cc: r...@debian.org, t...@libreoffice.org
>
> James Addison wrote:
> > And so a question: could the fix be achieved by changing the default
> > v
Source: debian-installer
Version: 20230607+deb12u4
Severity: wishlist
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: randomness
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org, rclo...@rclobus.nl,
alpernebiya...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer / Hi Cyril,
I'm an occasional
Source: geophar
Followup-For: Bug #1059576
X-Debbugs-Cc: georges.khazna...@orange.fr
Ok, thanks Georges.
Please note: there is a possible bug with reprotest reported on Salsa CI[1]
that means that reprotest does not vary the timezone between its comparison
builds.
If you begin seeing reprotest
Source: ksh93u+m
Severity: wishlist
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: randomness
Dear Maintainer,
I'm an occasional volunteer with the Reproducible Builds[1] project, and
noticed recently that the ksh93u+m Debian package failed build reproducibility
testing[2] on amd64.
Followup-For: Bug #1059631
X-Debbugs-Cc: mity...@debian.org
Hi Dmitry - could you recommend whether there's anything I should do next for
this bug?
As context: the patch was accepted upstream, but with modifications that make
it cleaner for Qt6.6 albeit in a non-5.15.x compatible way. I realize
Followup-For: Bug #1059631
X-Debbugs-Cc: mity...@debian.org
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 00:01:40 +0300, Dmitry wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 06:40:35PM +0000, James Addison wrote:
> [ ... snip ... ]
> > My sense is that with the patch here and also the patch from #1059592
> > app
Followup-For: Bug #859572
X-Debbugs-Cc: solo-debianb...@goeswhere.com,
bugs-debian-20170...@james-ross.co.uk
Control: reassign -1 libxml2
Control: affects -1 libxslt1.1 xsltproc
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxslt/-/issues/37
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
Control: fixed
Followup-For: Bug #1059805
X-Debbugs-Cc: r...@debian.org, t...@libreoffice.org
On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 19:40:09, I wrote:
> Please note: I haven't tested the patch yet, hence not adding a
> 'patch' tag to this bug yet - I'm building libreoffice locally after
> installing the patched+compiled clucene
Followup-For: Bug #819914
X-Debbugs-Cc: p...@passoire.fr
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/pull/1496
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
Control: fixed -1 imagemagick/8:6.9.11.24+dfsg-1
Control: close -1
Handling of SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH has been implemented by upstream,
Followup-For: Bug #1061630
Control: forwarded -1
https://salsa.debian.org/vim-team/vim-debian/-/merge_requests/15
Control: tags -1 patch
Package: vim-runtime
Version: 2:9.1.0016-1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
This is a cosmetic issue that affects syntax highlighting of DEB822-format
apt source-list files.
Directory paths within these files can contain substrings that are incorrectly
matched by some of the deb822sources.vim
Source: stellarium
Followup-For: Bug #1060802
X-Debbugs-Cc: tom...@debian.org, mity...@debian.org
> stellarium 23.4-1 added a new build-dependency on qtwebengine5-dev, which
> prevents it from building on some release architectures (and all non-release
> ones).
Would 'qtwebengine5-dev |
Followup-For: Bug #738575
X-Debbugs-Cc: raykinsell...@gmail.com
If I understand correctly, then Ray's libx1000 library[1] provides a way to
work around this in software. It uses some LD_PRELOAD magic, and from what I
remember, it's worth being careful when using that approach.
I opened an
fficiency focus of them that gathered my interest in the first
place, FWIW.
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 12:27, James Addison wrote:
>>
>> Followup-For: Bug #738575
>> X-Debbugs-Cc: raykinsell...@gmail.com
>>
>> If I understand correctly, then Ray's libx
Followup-For: Bug #1035392
Control: close -1
(closing; I'll likely re-attempt an install on the same hardware with a more
recent release of Debian in future, for comparison purposes)
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 09:57, Ray Kinsella wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 22:30, James Addison wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 21:57, Ray Kinsella wrote:
> [...]
> I spent a not insignificant amount of time devising this solution, to get
> "Debian Sup
Followup-For: Bug #1054290
Sorry, I made an important mistake in my phrasing about these two packages:
> * mupen64plus-core - this appears unaffected in Debian; it declares a
>build-time dependency on libminizip-dev, and the build system uses this
>when available. I've verified that by
Followup-For: Bug #1054290
Updates on some other codebases where minizip appears vendored in Debian source
packages:
* gdal - the fix for minizip is included in upstream version 3.8.0 and a
packaged version of that release has been accepted into Debian unstable.
* mupen64plus-core -
Source: zlib
Followup-For: Bug #1054290
I now think that patching vendored minizip code in libxlsxwriter would not help
because it specifies the 'USE_SYSTEM_MINIZIP' define at build-time[1] in
combination with a build-time dependency[2] on 'libminizip-dev' to link to the
required library
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #1022923
Control: submitter -1 ja...@reciperadar.com
Source: smplayer
Followup-For: Bug #1034867
Using smplayer 23.6.0+ds0-1 with mplayer does now play video under Wayland as
expected; thank you!
The separate issue of mplayer breakage when using an invalid wid parameter in
combination with the nokeepaspect option still seems replicable to me using
301 - 400 of 485 matches
Mail list logo
