Source: sofia-sip
Followup-For: Bug #984845
X-Debbugs-Cc: vagr...@reproducible-builds.org
Control: fixed -1 1.12.11+20110422.1-2.2
Control: close -1
The sofia-sip package now appears to build reproducibly[1], so I believe that
this bugreport can be closed. An upgrade[2] of debhelper appears to ha
Source: ffmpeg
Followup-For: Bug #985187
X-Debbugs-Cc: vagr...@reproducible-builds.org
Control: fixed -1 7:6.1-1
Control: close -1
This package is not yet building reproducibly[1], but the build-path embed
correctly identified by this bugreport as a contributing factor has been
removed[2] from ffm
Source: sofia-sip
Followup-For: Bug #984845
X-Debbugs-Cc: vagr...@reproducible-builds.org
Control: notfixed -1 1.12.11+20110422.1-2.2
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 13:22:13 +, I wrote:
> The sofia-sip package now appears to build reproducibly[1], so I believe that
> this bugreport can be closed. An upg
Source: sofia-sip
Followup-For: Bug #984845
X-Debbugs-Cc: vagr...@reproducible-builds.org
Control: reopen -1
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Because Debian builds packages from a fixed build path, customized build paths
are _not_ currently evaluated by the 'reprotest' utility in Sa
Package: python-pathos-doc
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch upstream
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: cpu
Dear Maintainer,
I'm an occasional volunteer contributor with the Reproducible Builds[1]
project, and noticed recently that the python-pathos-doc package failed[2] an
Package: patroni-doc
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch upstream
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: randomness
Dear Maintainer,
I'm an occasional volunteer contributor with the Reproducible Builds[1]
project, and noticed recently that the patroni-doc package failed[2] an
auto
Package: python-rdflib-doc
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch upstream
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: randomness
Dear Maintainer,
I'm an occasional volunteer contributor with the Reproducible Builds[1]
project, and noticed recently that the python-rdflib-doc package faile
Package: xonsh-doc
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch upstream
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: randomness
Dear Maintainer,
I'm an occasional volunteer contributor with the Reproducible Builds[1]
project, and noticed recently that the xonsh-doc package failed[2] an automate
Package: patroni-doc
Followup-For: Bug #1066015
Control: tags -1 - patch
(clearing unintentionally-included patch tag)
Followup-For: Bug #1066014
Control: forwarded -1
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pathos/-/merge_requests/1
Followup-For: Bug #1066016
Control: forwarded -1
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/rdflib/-/merge_requests/2
Followup-For: Bug #1066017
Control: forwarded -1
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/xonsh/-/merge_requests/3
Hi Olly,
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 at 20:42, Olly Betts wrote:
>
> [ ... snip ... ]
> There are currently 7 shards in the lists database, but only the first 6
> were listed to be searched. It looks like indexing is working fine,
> except it started a new shard and failed to update the list to search.
Package: libmaven-bundle-plugin-java
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: toolchain
Dear Maintainer,
The maven-bundle-plugin utility creates Java .jar archives that contain
non-deterministic contents in the Export-Package, Private-Package and
Source: gnome-maps
Followup-For: Bug #1066083
X-Debbugs-Cc: la...@debian.org
Please note: for some other GNOME appdata.xml files, upstream has preferred to
remove dynamic Meson release @date values entirely, which also achieves
reproducibility; that approach might be simpler and perhaps more align
ts.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/arm64/diffoscope-results/koko.html
[3] - https://salsa.debian.org/DebianOnMobile-team/koko/-/jobs/5423718
[4] - https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/issues/945
From: James Addison
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:37:43 +
Subject: unzip the cities1000.z
Source: koko
Version: 23.08.3+ds.1-2
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
During filing of #1066088, some build failures of the 'blhc'[1] test utility
occurred on Salsa-CI[2]. These indicate that some compile-time security
hardening flags may not be enabled when the binary package is compiled (th
severity -1 wishlist
thanks
Dear Maintainer,
Because Debian builds packages from a fixed build path, neither the 'reprotest'
utility in Salsa-CI, nor the Reproducible Builds team's package test
infrastructure for Debian[1] currently check for equivalent binary package
output from differing source
Package: python-rdflib-doc
Followup-For: Bug #1066016
X-Debbugs-Cc: cru...@debian.org
Hi Michael,
Thank you for merging and uploading this change. Unfortunately it seems that
my suggestion didn't solve the problem (based on inspecting the results of a
recent reprotest[1] on Salsa - there's still
Package: debian-policy
Followup-For: Bug #1064593
X-Debbugs-Cc: hwans...@mailbox.org, stephane.blon...@gmail.com,
spwhit...@spwhitton.name
Hello,
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 22:53:54 +0100, Holger wrote:
> Stéphane Blondon wrote (Mon, 4 Mar 2024 08:29:10
> +0100):
> [...snip...]
> > The symlink is rel
Package: libpython3.12-dev
Followup-For: Bug #1064028
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@debian.org
Control: reopen -1
Control: found -1 3.12.1-2
Hello,
On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 10:35:42 +0100, Matthias wrote:
> That was fixed in the upstream 3.12.2 release.
The problem does not appear to be resolved; building onboar
Followup-For: Bug #1064028
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@debian.org
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/116869
It seemed worth forwarding this bugreport upstream, since it may be a quick fix
there (initially I felt that it may be worth handling in Debian initially and
then forwardi
Package: bind9-doc
Followup-For: Bug #1064782
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/4886
Package: bind9-doc
Followup-For: Bug #1064782
Control: tags -1 = upstream fixed-upstream
Source: elpa
Followup-For: Bug #1076025
Control: forwarded -1
https://salsa.debian.org/debichem-team/elpa/-/merge_requests/1
Control: tags -1 patch
Package: cdimage.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #1005886
X-Debbugs-Cc: powe...@gmail.com
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Tony,
> The computer is:
> Lenovo X1 Carbon Gen 6
> Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8650U CPU @ 1.90GHz
> Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (iwlwifi loads fine, during installation)
I've a fai
Source: gcc-11
Followup-For: Bug #1004184
Control: fixed -1 gcc-14/14.1.0-1
I haven't yet confirmed that the output of an O1/O2 build is corrected when
compiling on MIPS, but the relevant patches have arrived in gcc v14.1 and are
packaged in Debian, so I'm updating the tags on this bug to record t
Thanks Graham! With an answer to your question inline below:
On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 at 14:02, Graham Inggs wrote:
>
> Hi James
>
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 at 11:27, James Addison wrote:
> > Ok: I can confirm that removing the (OpenMPI-provided) symbols from
> > the libelpa19.s
Source: libpod
Version: 5.2.1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: podman-comp...@packages.debian.org, c...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 podman-compose
Dear Maintainer,
In #1054460 a duplicate-file conflict on the podman-compose.1 manual was
resolved: the manual was dropped from the podman binary pac
Source: pyfai
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: buildpath cpu
Dear Maintainer,
I'm an occasional volunteer contributor to the Reproducible Builds[1] project,
and noticed that the pyFAI package fai
On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 at 12:42, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
wrote:
>
> If you are part of the Debian science just push to the repository.
>
> It is easyer for me to revert from git, than to remember to check for MR :)
OK. I'm not currently - I'll open an MR as the next available alternative.
> thank
On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 at 14:06, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
wrote:
>
>
>
> > The meson-python build generates and uses a temporary, randomized build
> > directory path only when no build-dir setting is already configured. So we
> > may
> > be able to resolve this problem by choosing an appropriate stat
On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 at 21:14, Vagrant Cascadian
wrote:
>
> user reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> usertags 1064748 +randomness -buildpath
> thanks
>
> On 2024-08-09, James Addison wrote:
> > Usertags: buildpath cpu
> ...
> > The first cause of non-de
Source: clucene-core
Followup-For: Bug #1059805
X-Debbugs-Cc: r...@debian.org, t...@libreoffice.org
Dear Maintainer, Rene, Thorsten,
I have to admit that I have not, and am not likely to, find the time or gain
the necessary experience to properly develop and test an alternative to the
libreoffice
On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 at 09:59, James Addison wrote:
> [ ... snip ... ]
> Thanks, Vagrant - it's possible that I'm splitting hairs, but the randomized
> temporary path is created below the working build directory, and the problem
> occurs due to the embedding of that complete
ed a pull request for that upstream with sphinx-rtd-theme[1] although
I expect that the Sphinx version dependency may be a concern for it.
[1] - https://github.com/readthedocs/sphinx_rtd_theme/pull/1588
commit 2e97557739984dcd026cb86610cbf322ce3e48dd
Author: James Addison
Date: Mon Aug 12 12:5
NB: Technically, the patch I attached is not the entirety of the git commit
referenced in the header line: I omitted the autogenerated/minified
theme.js that was included when I offered the change upstream
(reasoning(s): it's not the preferred form for modification, and Debian
uses the unminified c
Source: gnome-maps
Followup-For: Bug #1066083
X-Debbugs-Cc: la...@debian.org
Control: forwarded -1
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-maps/-/merge_requests/453
Although a SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH-based approach was suggested in this bugreport,
I've independently opened an alternative that removes the
Source: gnome-maps
Followup-For: Bug #1066083
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-maps/-/issues/729
Process-wise: I think it makes more sense to set the 'forwarded' property
on this bug to the upstream issue I've reported, instead of the corresponding
merge request. This me
Source: gnome-maps
Followup-For: Bug #1066083
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
Source: meshlab
Followup-For: Bug #1001870
Control: fixed -1 meshlab/2020.09+dfsg1-3
Control: close -1
On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 14:31:26 +, Graham wrote:
> I have filed bug #1078978 requesting removal of elpa's binaries on
> these architectures, lowering severity.
I've been taking a quick look at this while inspecting the status of
the python3.12-only transition (as gpaw is one of the few remaining
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024, 13:29 Graham Inggs wrote:
> Hi James
>
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 12:06, James Addison wrote:
> > [ ... snip ... ]
> >
> > From the build logs: the failure seems to be due to the missing
> > mpi_fortran_... symbols on 32-bit ARM; but those
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024, 13:57 Graham Inggs wrote:
> Hi James
>
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 12:40, James Addison wrote:
> > Ok, thank you. Could we resolve this by adding libelpa.symbols.arch
> file(s), minus the openmpi symbols, for the failing architectures?
>
> That migh
On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 15:16, James Addison wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024, 13:57 Graham Inggs wrote:
>>
>> Hi James
>>
>> On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 12:40, James Addison wrote:
>> > Ok, thank you. Could we resolve this by adding libelpa.symbols.arch
>&
Source: debian-installer
Version: 20230607+deb12u4
Severity: wishlist
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: randomness
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org, rclo...@rclobus.nl,
alpernebiya...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer / Hi Cyril,
I'm an occasional contrib
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 20:32, James Addison wrote:
>
> (with apologies for forgetting to cc Rene on my previous message)
>
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 19:45, James Addison wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 16:59, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> > >
> > > So
Package: libreoffice-writer
Followup-For: Bug #974220
X-Debbugs-Cc: filh...@gmail.com, mariojos...@yahoo.com.br
Hi Claudio, Mario,
Do either of you have security software called warsaw installed, for example
to support internet banking?
There is an open bug[1] in the LibreOffice bugtracker since
Followup-For: Bug #859572
X-Debbugs-Cc: solo-debianb...@goeswhere.com,
bugs-debian-20170...@james-ross.co.uk
Control: reassign -1 libxml2
Control: affects -1 libxslt1.1 xsltproc
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxslt/-/issues/37
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
Control: fixed
Followup-For: Bug #819914
X-Debbugs-Cc: p...@passoire.fr
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/pull/1496
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
Control: fixed -1 imagemagick/8:6.9.11.24+dfsg-1
Control: close -1
Handling of SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH has been implemented by upstream, and
Followup-For: Bug #1059805
X-Debbugs-Cc: r...@debian.org, t...@libreoffice.org
On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 19:40:09, I wrote:
> Please note: I haven't tested the patch yet, hence not adding a
> 'patch' tag to this bug yet - I'm building libreoffice locally after
> installing the patched+compiled clucene pa
Followup-For: Bug #1059631
X-Debbugs-Cc: mity...@debian.org
Hi Dmitry - could you recommend whether there's anything I should do next for
this bug?
As context: the patch was accepted upstream, but with modifications that make
it cleaner for Qt6.6 albeit in a non-5.15.x compatible way. I realize
Followup-For: Bug #1059631
X-Debbugs-Cc: mity...@debian.org
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 00:01:40 +0300, Dmitry wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 06:40:35PM +0000, James Addison wrote:
> [ ... snip ... ]
> > My sense is that with the patch here and also the patch from #1059592
> > app
Source: geophar
Followup-For: Bug #1059576
X-Debbugs-Cc: georges.khazna...@orange.fr
Ok, thanks Georges.
Please note: there is a possible bug with reprotest reported on Salsa CI[1]
that means that reprotest does not vary the timezone between its comparison
builds.
If you begin seeing reprotest f
Source: ksh93u+m
Severity: wishlist
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: randomness
Dear Maintainer,
I'm an occasional volunteer with the Reproducible Builds[1] project, and
noticed recently that the ksh93u+m Debian package failed build reproducibility
testing[2] on amd64.
Package: python3-sepolicy
Followup-For: Bug #1064895
Control: fixed -1 3.7-1
Control: close -1
Thank you, Laurent and Russell!
Package: python-lmfit-doc
Version: 1.2.2-3
Severity: minor
X-Debbugs-Cc: ti...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
Some of the code examples in the HTML documentation for python-lmfit-doc
provide web hyperlinks to upstream API documentation; numpy and matplotlib
objects for example.
The matplotlib hyper
Thanks Cyril, Frédéric - it feels like we're reaching a consensus that
udpkg may not be multi-process safe (although, strictly speaking, I
would say we haven't proven that yet).
The authors of multi-console support could be the best people to
recommend a path forward, as they may have close knowle
This might also be the same issue as reported in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944125
(some kind of race condition where multiple consoles are available and
entered into the inittab, and a /var/lib/dpkg/status.bak is found
instead of the expected status file)
Does d-i tend to use udpkg for bootstrapping?
If so, I think
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/udpkg/-/blob/master/status.c#L390
could be a potential section of code to investigate further.
It doesn't look like full-fat dpkg performs these kind of renames on
the status file.
Hello - adding a small reminder/bump on this bug; it would be useful
to have the kubeadm command available as a package alongside the other
Kubernetes tools and binaries. If there's an alternative plan for how
to provide that, please let me know - or I can refresh the patch soon.
Thanks,
James
I had a feeling there was a good reason for this :)
Thank you!
On Sun, Aug 1, 2021, 22:04 Janos LENART wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Absolutely. However, there are missing pieces for the puzzle (cni). This
> is in the pipeline.
>
> Janos
>
> On Sat, 31 Jul 2021, 19:36 James Add
Package: snapshot.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #959518
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@jp-hosting.net
The issue appears reproducible at the moment with apt 1.8.2.1 compiled from
source and the 'x.tar' configuration provided earlier.
# apt source directory, post-build
$ cmdline/apt -o Dir=$PWD/x -o Dir::Bin::
Package: snapshot.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #959518
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@jp-hosting.net
Understood. The environment I'd like to get this working for is based on
Debian stable, so we might be at an impasse unless I can compile the latest apt
sources using buster. I'm making progress on that an
Package: snapshot.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #959518
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@jp-hosting.net
(sorry: I realized I meant 'compile ... using bullseye' in that previous
message, not buster (stable))
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gt-img
Version : 0.5.7
Upstream Author : The Genuinetools Authors
* URL : https://github.com/genuinetools/img/
License : MIT
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Standalone, daemon-less, unprivileged Docke
Package: apt
Version: 1.8.2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
During installation of packages under Debian Buster[1], I've encountered a
repeatable (non-TLS) HTTP download error that occurs during download of
openjdk-11-jdk-headless.
It's possible this may expose a rare edge case in apt's HTTP c
Package: nodejs
Version: 14.13.0~dfsg-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@jp-hosting.net
Dear Maintainer,
The /usr/bin/node ELF binary in the nodejs package has an executable stack and
although I'm not certain whether this implies any potential for attack, it
seemed worth reporting. I do not b
Package: snapshot.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #959518
Dear Maintainer,
I've reassigned this issue to both 'apt' and 'snapshot.debian.org' since it
seems possible that either an HTTP client edge case and/or a server-side
connection-handling behaviour may be the cause(s).
It also seems possible t
22:13:17.0 +0100
+++ kubernetes-1.18.2/debian/changelog 2020-05-10 19:42:02.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+kubernetes (1.18.2-2.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload
+ * kubernetes-admin
+- New package containing kubeadm command
+
+ -- James Addison Sun, 1
Package: apt,snapshot.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #959518
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@jp-hosting.net
Thanks for the update! - the issue *does* remain reproducible at the moment,
and unfortunately cherry-picking the fix (merge commit 7d22263) into the
1.8.2.z branch and building a version of apt from there
Package: apt,snapshot.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #959518
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@jp-hosting.net
FWIW, the series of steps in use for repro are:
# prereq: install apt compile-time dependencies
# prereq: add apt deb sources, keys as per docs at http://snapshot.debian.org/
$ git clone "https://salsa.de
Package: apt,snapshot.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #959518
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@jp-hosting.net
Thank you both! I should've done a more digging into the commit history for
the related HTTP fixes. I'm not sure I would've easily figured out the apt
method issue but it's a relief to see there's a comm
Package: sponsorship-requests
Followup-For: Bug #1026277
X-Debbugs-Cc: package-sponsorship-reque...@lists.debian.org
Hi folks,
I'm looking for sponsors for my package 'quadrilateralcowboy' - the source
package is available on Salsa[1] and for inspection on mentors.debian.net[2].
The package is a
Package: smplayer
Followup-For: Bug #1034867
On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 20:31:38 + I wrote:
> The separate issue of mplayer breakage when using an invalid wid parameter in
> combination with the nokeepaspect option still seems replicable to me using
> mplayer at version 1.5+svn38423-2+b1 -- a version
Source: burp
Version: 3.1.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@jp-hosting.net
Dear Maintainer,
The unit tests for 'burp' perform a version check[1] on zlib to decide[2]
between a choice of zip-related a
Package: debian-installer
Followup-For: Bug #849400
X-Debbugs-Cc: jin...@onelittlehope.com
Hi Jinesh,
Can you provide a series of steps to replicate the failure case reported in
this bug?
I'll try to find time within the next two weeks to confirm the results that you
and others have seen here, a
Thanks Jinesh - one question in particular inline below:
On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 at 01:29, Jinesh Choksi wrote:
>
>
> > Can you provide a series of steps to replicate the failure case reported in
> > this bug?
>
>
> Reproduction Steps
>
> - Boot using debian-12.1.0-amd64-netinst.iso in a VM
>
> - At
Followup-For: Bug #1059805
X-Debbugs-Cc: r...@debian.org, t...@libreoffice.org
PS: Reminded by a thread[1] on the RB mailing lists about potential issues
with SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH reader code, and from reading the relevant strtoul(3)
manual: the patch I provided lacks error-checking, and should be up
Package: vim-runtime
Version: 2:9.1.0016-1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
This is a cosmetic issue that affects syntax highlighting of DEB822-format
apt source-list files.
Directory paths within these files can contain substrings that are incorrectly
matched by some of the deb822sources.vim sy
Followup-For: Bug #1061630
Control: forwarded -1
https://salsa.debian.org/vim-team/vim-debian/-/merge_requests/15
Control: tags -1 patch
Package: gitlab-cli
Version: 1:4.3.0-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@jp-hosting.net
Dear Maintainer,
The manual page for the python-gitlab CLI utility in the gitlab-cli binary
package contains a Python stacktrace within the 'description' section, instead
of the expected help content:
Source: lomiri-ui-toolkit
Followup-For: Bug #1060761
X-Debbugs-Cc: sunwea...@debian.org, mity...@debian.org
Hi Mike, Dmitry,
Is the second patch here (to disable the failing unit test) likely to be
uploaded to unstable in the nearish future?
I'm eager to see the results of some build reproducibi
Package: libpython3.12-dev
Version: 3.12.1-2
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream newcomer
Dear Maintainer,
Some of the C code contained within the headerfiles from libpython3.12-dev
appears not to be compliant with C90 standards (examples: [1][2]).
This contributed to a build failure[3] for the onboa
Package: thunderbird
Followup-For: Bug #1051551
X-Debbugs-Cc: alx.manpa...@gmail.com, c.schoen...@t-online.de
On Sat, 09 Sep 2023 19:16:32 +0200, Alex wrote:
> Since some recent version, every time I delete a mail, the list scrolls
> up a few messages, and I need to manually scroll down again, eve
Source: qtbase-opensource-src
Version: 5.15.10+dfsg-6
Severity: normal
Tags: patch security
Dear Maintainer,
Security advisory CVE-2024-25580, a buffer overflow affecting KTX image
handling in QT, has been announced[1], and the announcement includes patches
for various versions of QT including th
Source: qtbase-opensource-src
Followup-For: Bug #1064056
Control: forcemerge 1064053 -1
Duplicate of #1064053; force merging this bugreport into that one.
Followup-For: Bug #1064052
Control: fixed -1 6.6.2+dfsg-1
Source: qtbase-opensource-src
Followup-For: Bug #1064053
Control: found -1
Control: found -1 5.12.2+dfsg-1
Replying to set the earliest version affected from the advisory blogpost[1],
and to (re)attach the patch from the duplicate bugreport.
[1]
https://www.qt.io/blog/security-advisory-potentia
Source: qtbase-opensource-src-gles
Followup-For: Bug #1064054
Control: found -1 5.12.2+dfsg-1
Control: tags -1 patch
diff --git a/src/gui/util/qktxhandler.cpp b/src/gui/util/qktxhandler.cpp
index 0d98e97453..6a79e55109 100644
--- a/src/gui/util/qktxhandler.cpp
+++ b/src/gui/util/qktxhandler.cpp
@@
Followup-For: Bug #1042955
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/sqlalchemyorg/zzzeeksphinx/issues/23
Followup-For: Bug #1029555
X-Debbugs-Cc: rol...@debian.org
Control: close -1 lintian/2.117.0
Resolved in lintian 2.117.0 as uploaded to unstable (and has migrated to
testing / trixie).
Refs:
-
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/commit/2d5c8528f490edb1339fd0a65b3e503c32b2c366
-
http
Followup-For: Bug #1058959
X-Debbugs-Cc: alexandre.deti...@gmail.com
Control: tags -1 pending
Followup-For: Bug #1028125
X-Debbugs-Cc: r...@debian.org
Control: reassign -1 file
Control: affects -1 lintian
This filetype ambiguity seems to be reported by the 'file' command that
lintian invokes[1] to identify the file type for source files that it scans.
[1] -
https://sources.debian.org/src
Source: snapd
Version: 2.61.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
I'm an occasional volunteer with the Reproducible Builds[1] project, and
recently noticed that the snapd package failed automated reproducible build
testing[2] on Debian.
One cause of non-reproducibility for the package appears
Followup-For: Bug #1064404
Control: forwarded -1 https://salsa.debian.org/debian/snapd/-/merge_requests/7
Control: tags -1 patch
Control: submitter -1 reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: user reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: usertag -1 timezone
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Some recent discussion from the Debian mailing lists appears to be missing
from the mailing list search engine[1] indices.
For example:
* Searching for 'Debian'[2] in the debian-devel mailing list, results sorted
by date, curr
Package: python-flask-limiter-doc
Version: 3.5.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
I'm an occasional volunteer contributor to the Reproducible Builds[1] project,
and recently noticed that python-flask-limiter-docs package failed to build
reproducibly during automated reproducible
Package: python-flask-limiter-doc
Followup-For: Bug #1064519
Control: forwarded -1
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/flask-limiter/-/merge_requests/2
Source: python-fudge
Version: 1.1.1-2
Severity: wishlist
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
Dear Maintainer,
I'm an occasional volunteer contributor with the Reproducible Builds[1]
project, and noticed that the python-fudge package failed an automated
reproduci
401 - 500 of 523 matches
Mail list logo
