Control: forcemerge 587087 743625
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
ill default for
some fringe architectures.
I would very much like to have only to care about one API of the SDL
packages and all its "modules", but this is not possible. Many years
after SDL-v2 being there, and unsupported by upstream since 2012, 75% of
packages still depend on SDL-1.2, there are 300~400 rdepds of
libsdl-1.2.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
es up with aptitude-on-steroids and "breaks" things again.
So closing the bug now.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
ll-upgrade. I also
added etc/bash_completion.d to aptitude.dirs and added ...
The version in bash-completion has supported safe-/full-upgrade for
some time.
I am quite sure that it's still up-to-date, we didn't change many
command line options and try to not break existing usage.
2016-06-08 15:38 GMT+01:00 Lennart Sorensen :
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 10:23:03PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> After almost a decade, things got worse over the years after this report
>> (with the binary named aptitude-curses and the now-disabled
>> aptitud
;D' until one wants to view information of a particular package
causing troubles.
So, for all the reasons above, marking as +wontfix and closing.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
because other
tools like grep-dctrl or build-rdeps (from devscripts I think) on
provide efficient and widely used ways to do this for a long time.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Hi Axel,
2016-03-07 23:13 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
2016-03-07 22:40 GMT+00:00 Axel Beckert :
>but then again in the --sort
>section doesn't contain the policy names and it refers to the on-line
>guide (which in my opinion is good, to not repeat information which can
>
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hi Axel,
2016-02-14 15:16 Axel Beckert:
Hi,
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>if I call either 'aptitude -o "Aptitude::Pkg-Display-Limit=~i" -o
>"Aptitude::UI::Flat-View-As-First-View=true"' or 'aptitude -o
>&qu
2016-06-02 03:55 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson:
"MAFM" == Manuel A Fernandez Montecelo writes:
MAFM> Do you have any more info to know why 8:6.8.9.9-7+b1 instead of +b2 is
MAFM> chosen? What's the current status of imagemagick? (e.g. half
MAFM> configured or something?).
All
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo + wontfix
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
indeed fixed when we release the next version.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Control: tags -1 + pending
Control: owner -1 !
Hi again,
2016-04-21 21:53 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
Hi Josh,
2016-04-20 01:50 Josh Triplett:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.7.8-1
Severity: normal
"man aptitude" says:
-t , --target-release
Set the release from which packa
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo + wontfix
Control: close -1
2016-04-26 20:13 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
In general, I think that the number of options currently supported by
aptitude (over 100) and the complexity of its interrelationship is quite
high, and I suspect that most users expect
Hi,
Ssimply forwarding this reply to the BTS, for the record and future
investigation.
2016-05-07 19:05 GMT+01:00 Daniel Hahler :
> On 04.05.2016 17:02, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>
>>> Using ":package-name-or-pattern" during upgrade/installation is ver
Control: tags -1 - help newcomer + pending
2015-11-13 17:02 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
Control: severity -1 minor
Control: tags -1 + help newcomer
Hi Gokdeniz,
2009-03-25 16:00 Gokdeniz Karadag:
package: aptitude
Hi,
Man pages for aptitude-create-state-bundle and aptitude-run-state
not tried it." [2] ;-)
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Knuth
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
d break expectations of people that have been using
apt-listchanges for more than a decade.
apt-listchanges already asks about config details through debconf, so
perhaps adding another question related to this would be easy -- if and
once the filters are implemented, of course.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Hi,
Thanks for your work on apt-listchanges and fixing this issue!
Any idea about when the version below is going to move to unstable?
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2016-04-30 16:49 Robert Luberda:
Source: apt-listchanges
Source-Version: 3.2
We believe that the bug you
ristics is to give
user-desired hints. It will suggest to Keep few packages installed
rather than upgrade many, specially if they come from non-default
versions.
Next, with me explicitly rejecting the removal of iceweasel and the
cancellation of my upgrade of iceweasel, the resolver then co
> Otherwise just by upgrading I saw nightmares like "/etc/etc/"
> directories, etc.
OK, so closing then, because without that information there's not much
that we can do, and the basic problem is both well known and
impossible to avoid by aptitude anyway.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Control: close -1
Hi,
2016-05-05 17:10 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
2016-04-25 19:22 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
2016-04-25 12:22 Axel Beckert:
Hi Manuel,
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
If I select a package for reinstallation by pressing "L&qu
2016-06-11 18:14 GMT+01:00 Josh Triplett :
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 01:03:39PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> 2012-02-04 19:10 Josh Triplett:
>> > Package: aptitude
>> > Version: 0.6.4-1.2
>> > Severity: normal
>> >
>> > I&#x
signing this report to localepurge, to see if the
maintainer wants to say something about this (e.g. propose changes in
aptitude, if needed) or change things on their side, in localepurge.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
dependency problems.
So sorry, but I am marking this as +wontfix, as well as closing it
because I don't see this changing in the foreseeable future.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
matches one in the available set from
the given repositories, it's local/obsolete.
But this, as well as your nice search string, is nothing that the
average user will ever do (because he even doesn't think about this
issue),... neither would automated tools like Nagios/Icinga's check_apt
do.
For some definitions of average users, I don't think that you would find
an intersection between the set of "average users" and "users mixing
Debian stable and unstable" :)
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
(I recently learnt that some devels learn about new packages by
reading a mailing list of all incoming packages... very surprising
for me).
[3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=421043
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2016-06-11 19:06 Josh Triplett:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 06:57:14PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
The mechanism is there, it's just not automatically applied just by
asking to upgrade, and I don't think that it should be changed at this
point.
I don't think th
Control: reassign -1 src:cwidget
Hi,
2015-10-26 10:33 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
Control: found -1 aptitude/0.6.11
Hi all,
2015-10-22 12:23 Axel Beckert:
Control: tag -1 + confimred - unreproducible
Hi,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> 5. press "/", and enter "you", e
2016-03-18 14:40 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
aptitude doesn't know that you prefer to install the version from
experimental than the one from unstable, if it's pinned lower:
=
# apt-cache policy transmission-cli
transmission-cli:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 2.03-2
Ver
Control: tags -1 - pending
Control: close -1
Hi,
2016-05-31 12:44 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
2016-05-26 17:26 David Kalnischkies:
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 04:50:20PM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
A while back, I noticed that aptitude and apt could no longer be used
together on my system: If
used this. Were you using aptitude in that way?
However, I downgraded apt packages to 1.2.12 (before the fix for LZ4
leaks), set the options to keep indices compressed etc., repeated the
operations described above, and similar results -- only 20~30 file
descriptors.
So I am a bit out of clues.
atterns, also in both cases).
Will be present in the next release, so marking as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
ion of the
code in 2008.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
e happy to break these recommended dependencies, which is equivalent
to "OK, fine, it breaks a Recommends, now can we do it already ?"
So I don't consider this to be a bug. With the previous behaviour it
breaks recommends without acknowledgement or even showing any prominent
warning in some cases, which is problematic.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
pends for libibus-1.0 and rebuild with it.
Support enabled now, will be present in the next release.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.libsdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3295
2016-04-27 22:41 GMT+01:00 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
:
> Hi,
>
> 2016-04-27 14:08 GMT+01:00 Gianfranco Costamagna :
>> Hi Manuel and libsdl2 developers!
>>
>>
>> How do you feel about the
2016-04-29 12:43 Guillem Jover:
Hi!
On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 22:30:13 +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.18.4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Control: user debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Control: usertag -1 + riscv64
What ${subject} says. Patch attached with
2016-04-30 2:35 GMT+01:00 Jason Pleau :
> On 04/29/2016 06:44 AM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> Jason, if you want to test it to see if it works fine, then I can
>> submit both to upstream's bug report for them to decide.
>
> It looks like ${prefix
at it affects one of my
packages so I was about to NMU it myself, and came here only to see that
you saved me from it.
So just wanted to say that -- Thanks!
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
OT A above. Or say that
the "+" is the default action and optional.
I'm saying that you say what happens when "+" is added, but don't say if
that does or doesn't happen when it is not added.
You're reading the documentation phrase by phrase rather than on the
whole, as with many other bug reports. that way it doesn't work.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
means.
So 5 years after and with no intention to implement this, I am closing
this request.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
n indefinitely.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
translating it is not "free" either.
Since a while ago can be done with:
apt edit-sources
So I am closing it as wontfix, after 9+ years and no indication that
this is going to be solved now.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
k many packages.
So I am closing this bug now, it doesn't make sense to keep it open
indefinitely if this is not going to be implemented.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
to head with an
action that you requested. If we default to "q" in those cases, we
would soon have requests for people complaining that "aptitude doesn't
default to the sensible request".
So, +wontfix and closing.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
nobody steps in, at some point maybe the
only solution is to remove the french documentation package.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
t, no need to show all 145 of them (count of packages named like
that today).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
file.
This doesn't seem to have been a problem for 14 years and nobody else
requested it, so closing now.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
for
many years now, so closing this 14-year old bug because it doesn't make
sense to keep it open indefinitely.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
user-tags for this purpose, to
remind you why a package was installed by you, in the case that you
forget.
As it is, I don't think that this is going to be implemented any time
soon, and seeing that it was already open for a decade with no action, I
am going to close it as +wontfix.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Contol: tags -1 + wontfix
Contol: close -1
Repeating, it seems that it wasn't processed...
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
thing like
1,234.5 kB
12.9 kB
789.7 kB
This is basically a duplicate of #323303, so closing.
(Could be merged, but since the other covers all aspects, merging will
only cause to spend extra time when reviewing the other).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
ow long it will take, so I don't think that it's trivial or possible to
make very accurate estimations in any case.
So I am going to close this as +wontfix, because since this cannot be
addressed by aptitude there's not much point in keeping it open
indefinitely, sorry.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
e...
After 10+ years probably nevery going to happen, but anyway, tagging as
+help as an admission that the current devel resources are not enough to
tackle this.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
re is quite non-trivial to implement and maintain.
So I am closing this as +wontfix, because unless somebody would step up
to implement and maintain the feature it wouldn't happen, and it's been
laying there already for more than 4 years without receiving any
attention.
Cheers.
--
Manu
Control: close -1
2016-03-30 12:33 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
Hi Ludovic,
2006-12-15 23:04 Ludovic Gasc:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.4-1
With apt-build, it's possible to recompile easily a deb.
It would be greatful if it's possible with
or complaining that it's absurd
> MAFM> to have the two when they actually do the same, etc.
>
> (Well just document that there is no difference.) But OK never mind.
The "We'll" actually always means "You'll" in practice (and "me" in
this case), and not looking forward to do that.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
utcomes of its actions
are.
Have you experienced this problem lately?
If affirmative, does it happen with the recently released 0.8, or is it
with older versions?
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
at this point.
In any case, 3+ years later, this is neither confirmed nor planned, so
marking as +wontfix.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
allistically we are not going to be able to do
anything about this, and keeping it open indefinitely does not make
sense.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
ckage being renamed, to preserve the information from before. If
old and new packages share config files, probably this is handled
specially by dpkg.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2016-04-10 03:09 Dmitry Smirnov:
On Saturday, 9 April 2016 2:40:45 PM AEST Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
wrote:
From "buildpackage" until it starts unpacking the package's source and
compiling.
Sorry, I'm unable to spot anything useful... Maybe you could try?
Simple &qu
4
[2]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=aptitude/aptitude.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/wip-cmdline
This branch never came to be merged, so this doesn't apply now.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
now if it will
be noticeable. (In my system it takes less than 1 second, among other
reasons because the files are in cache due to continuous testing, so
it's difficult to notice).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2016-04-25 19:22 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
2016-04-25 12:22 Axel Beckert:
Hi Manuel,
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
If I select a package for reinstallation by pressing "L" in the TUI and
then press 2x "g", the package will be reinstalled.
Afterwards at "
y option (or the
most sensible, at any rate) is to use apt methods because this
integration happens when acquiring the packages -- which aptitude
doesn't do directly.
If there's nothing that we can do from aptitude's side until that
happens, I think that it's better to c
2016-05-04 21:16 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
2016-04-10 03:09 Dmitry Smirnov:
Sorry, I'm unable to spot anything useful... Maybe you could try?
Simple "apt-get source civicrm" is enough to fetch the package suitable to
reproduce the problem.
I don't always have the ti
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hi Axel,
2016-05-08 10:17 Axel Beckert:
Hi,
Axel Beckert wrote:
If I press "!" in aptitude's TUI and there's no conflict to solve,
aptitude segfaults.
JFYI: This doesn't happen with aptitude 0.7.5 in Testing.
Fixed, thanks!
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
ess
somebody steps up to do it).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Control: close -1
2016-05-08 04:18 Russ Allbery:
"Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" writes:
2010-01-28 17:59 Daniel Burrows:
I tracked down one bug that was part of this: aptitude was incorrectly
treating the automatic removal as a "manual&quo
2016-05-09 11:31 GMT+01:00 Dmitry Smirnov :
> On Wednesday, 4 May 2016 9:16:39 PM AEST Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>> pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: php-mail-mimedecode which is a
>> virtual package a
a kind of APT::"Install"::Pre-Invoke (if "Install" or
equivalent would exist, I don't think that it does now) would be ideal.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
e less
drastic solutions to conflicts as first choices (something addressed in
0.8).
So closing the bug as fixed with that version number.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo help
Control: close -1
2015-11-11 01:16 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo help
2015-11-11 0:56 GMT+00:00 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson :
Your mail has no bug number at all.
Thanks for noticing.
I don't know. I haven't used that hardwa
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo help
Control: close -1
Hi again,
2015-09-08 23:53 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo help
Hi Praveen,
2013-05-23 11:13 Praveen A:
package: aptitude
severity: important
when cdrom is disconnected at boot time and reconnected after system
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Control: close -1
Hi,
2016-03-08 22:47 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Jon,
2015-09-10 11:23 Jon Ander Peñalba:
Some packages are being marked as manually installed after running
'aptitude safe-upgrade', is this norma
automatically,
though it is marked as essential.
Fixed now, marking as +pending (and the sibling #555896).
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
for "show" and "changelog".
Thanks for the report.
Note for future review: this is probably the same issue as #693684, or
at least should be considered at the same time.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
g in
upgrading them (otherwise aptitude tries to upgrade, even if some
brokenness happens).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Control: tags -1 + pending
Control: owner -1 !
2016-04-21 21:41 GMT+01:00 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
:
> Control: tags -1 + pending
> Control: owner -1 !
>
>
> 2009-11-12 12:47 Ivan Vilata i Balaguer:
>>
>>
>> Assuming that the behaviour of ``apt-get`` is
for a
stable update -- I don't know if it's customary to use "Version: X" of
the bug report to indicate the version of the translation).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
pgrades and reinstalls and other changes in states, and save it to not
repeat them in later sessions.
Does it happen with any package that you try?
I don't have any clue of what might be wrong.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
x27;ll want to do this (use at
your own risk!).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
rors caused if doing so. I
think that it's a good idea to keep it.
Perhaps the error can be avoided in your use-case if remove/purge (and
thus, the error message) are only made effective in the case that the
package is not already removed/purged.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
ontinue" ignores the Ctrl-Z.
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>Not sure if it's gdb which is broken on armhf or something else.
Did you try with valgrind, btw?
Nope. Will try on the Raspberry Pi when I'm back home.
In armhf unusably slow I suppose, but in x86 is us
his in the command line: aptitude search '~n^gcc-6$'
- in curses, with '/' plus '^gcc-6$' and "OK"
- in curses, with 'l' plus '^gcc-6$' and "OK"
If it doesn't, please see if "aptitude update" works and gets all files
correctly.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2016-04-25 12:22 Axel Beckert:
Hi Manuel,
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>If I select a package for reinstallation by pressing "L" in the TUI and
>then press 2x "g", the package will be reinstalled.
>
>Afterwards at "Press Return to continue, '
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo + pending
2016-04-25 01:52 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
Control: severity -1 minor
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
2016-04-23 14:48 Christian Klein:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8-1
Severity: normal
From time to time, I invoke a "purge" (_ key) o
E.g. with #721426, if you upgrade pkgA today, then don't use aptitude
for a few days, then do "aptitude update" and "aptitude", if there was
another update to pkgA in the meantime, pkgA will be automatically
marked for upgrade -- because it didn't have time to register that the
upgrade had already happened in previous sessions, and so to remove it
from pending actions.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
feel free to close the bug report.
OK, thanks for the follow-up.
Closing now.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
quot; for a list of those already
unfulfilled.
If you install those recommended packages (or disable
APT::Install-Recommends, but I don't recommend that) the delay should
not happen. You might want to try this while a version fixing this
problem is not released.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
hy doesn't show
them (it probably does). ?broken and similar search patterns can be
used for this.
I just don't have all possible ways to list them on the top of my head.
The users will have to do some work on their own.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
spent already to optimise the 0.7 series, which was
about a week, I estimate that even very minor gains (<5%) can take
the best part of a day at the very least
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
but not for the reasons of this bug report, and I
don't consider doing it at this point.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
h a wrapper script adding an
appropriate -o option, but it would be great to have that feature in
aptitude proper.
If it's individual comman line options that are used quite often, I
suppose that shell command aliases can be a reasonable workaround as
well.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2016-04-27 8:37 GMT+01:00 Vincent Lefevre :
> On 2016-04-26 23:47:13 +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> Many of these problems were fixed in releases of the 0.7 series; I
>> suppose that this was one of those cases.
>
> Note that I can at least notice a relate
27;m fine with it in general, though; but since this is not Debian
specific I prefer if it's applied (or at least blessed) by upstream
first. If it's failing for Jason, it should affect more people using
other distros or the code directly from SDL repos.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
og 2015-12-25 12:47:31.0 +
+++ dpkg-1.18.4+nmu1/debian/changelog 2016-04-28 21:15:57.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+dpkg (1.18.4+nmu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add support for riscv64 (RISC-V 64 bits little-endian). Closes: #-1
+
+ -- Manuel A.
.
It has been submitted for review to the debian-l10n-dutch mailing list.
Please add it to your next package revision.
It should be put as "po/nl.po" in your package build tree.
===
Commited, thanks!
--
Manuel A.
701 - 800 of 2048 matches
Mail list logo
