Bug#753578: Packaging of python-requests breaks code relying on urllib3

Package: python-requests Version: 2.3.0-1 The patch for extracting urllib3 out of requests does not supply a stub for ``requests.packages.urllib3``, which breaks other code explicitly importing from that location. The bundled version of urllib3 is part of requests' API:

Bug#753578: Packaging of python-requests breaks code relying on urllib3

Hi Daniele, On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 12:33:42PM +0200, Daniele Tricoli wrote: Hello Markus, thanks for your report! On Thursday 03 July 2014 11:27:34 Markus Unterwaditzer wrote: The patch for extracting urllib3 out of requests does not supply a stub for ``requests.packages.urllib3

Bug#745027: RFP vdirsyncer

Hello Francois, I'm the author of vdirsyncer and would be extremely interested in packaging vdirsyncer for Debian and distros based on it, as Debian's packaging policies cause problems with user-installed Python packages, for example https://github.com/untitaker/vdirsyncer/issues/82. Let me know

Bug#745027: Missing dependencies

A question: If I release an update of vdirsyncer the day after it is packaged for Debian, how long would it take to reach the repo? Which intermediate staging repos are there that would delay an immediate update of the package? On 29 January 2016 17:05:18 CET, Filip Pytloun

Bug#745027: Missing dependencies

> > On 2016/01/29 18:31, Markus Unterwaditzer wrote: > > A question: If I release an update of vdirsyncer the day after it is > > packaged for Debian, how long would it take to reach the repo? Which > > intermediate staging repos are there that would delay an immediate up

Bug#745027: Missing dependencies

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 03:08:44PM -0500, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: > To be clear: this is only true if you are the Debian maintainer for > vdirsyncer. If someone else is the maintainer (as, reading this thread, it > seems is the intent) then it is *their* job to backport any relevant bugfixes >

Bug#745027: Fwd: Re: Bug#745027: Missing dependencies

(forgot to CC the Debian bugtracker) --- Begin Message --- On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 02:19:48PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 06:07:56PM +0100, Markus Unterwaditzer wrote: > > > Sorry to insist, but I'd really like to have a definitive answer on this

Bug#745027: Status

Martin, as far as I understand nothing has happened inbetween. The vdirsyncer documentation contains instructions for a manual installation that doesn't clutter up your system though. On 14 July 2016 13:38:23 CEST, martin f krafft wrote: >What's the status on this package?

Bug#745027: Status

Hello Filip, > I have reworked to use Pypi instead and keep setuptools_scm in place. Thanks! > These variables are not set, I don't know why it's trying to use proxy > (maybe it somehow finds out there's no network access so this is a > fallback?) It starts a server on localhost and tries to

Bug#745027: Status

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 07:19:06PM +0200, Filip Pytloun wrote: > Hello, > > I have finally got some time to move this forward. > > Packaged dependencies: > > python-atomicwrites > python-click-log > python-click-threading (waiting in NEW) > > and almost finished vdirsyncer packaging to

Bug#745027: Status

Thank you! On 25 August 2016 14:54:02 CEST, Filip Pytloun <fi...@pytloun.cz> wrote: >Hello Markus, > >It was uploaded just recently. >I missed new upstream version, will prepare updated package soon. > >Filip > >On 2016/08/25 14:42, Markus Unterwaditzer wrote

Bug#745027: Status

Hello Filip, I see that vdirsyncer has made it into Debian Sid (https://packages.debian.org/sid/vdirsyncer), thanks for that! However, the version there is already outdated a bit. Thanks! -- Markus On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 02:12:34PM +0200, Markus Unterwaditzer wrote: > Hello Filip, >