.
+
+ -- Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:01:46 +0200
+
nice (0.9.13-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u nice-0.9.13/debian/control nice-0.9.13/debian/control
--- nice-0.9.13/debian/control
+++ nice-0.9.13/debian/control
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Package
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
jmp has no rdepends and a low popcon. Its replacement, tijmp, was uploaded
into main (from contrib) earlier today.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi
We will look into re-fixing this for eclipse 3.5.0-1.
Until then you can install default-jre or default-jdk, which will
provide the default-java symlink (on i386 and amd64 this will be openjdk)=
=2E
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
It cannot be built without a java implementation from sun (which are being
phased out as well),
has no reverse (Build-)Depends, low popcon ( 50).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
noowner 264774
thanks
Hi
I have realised that after I joined the java-team I haven't been giving
this bug any attention. I am letting it go to avoid scaring others from
taking it. :)
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tags 166370 + wontfix
thanks
Hi
I think this suggest has become invalid after it was suggested.
We are trying to remove java-virtual-machine, java{,2}-compiler and
their likes, which this suggestion seems to conflict. See #365408 [1]
for more information.
~Niels
[1]
the current policy and our current packaging
methods.
-- Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net Sat, 28 Sep 2009 17:40:00 +0200
Package: proguard
Severity: important
User: pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: kaffe-removal
Hi
We are considering to remove kaffe from the repositories, since upstream is
dead, it lacks active maintaince from our side and we have free alternatives.
preferably you should
Package: henplus
Severity: important
User: pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: kaffe-removal
Hi
We are considering to remove kaffe from the repositories, since upstream is
dead, it lacks active maintaince from our side and we have free alternatives.
preferably you should
Package: realtimebattle-common
Severity: important
User: pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: kaffe-removal
Hi
We are considering to remove kaffe from the repositories, since upstream is
dead, it lacks active maintaince from our side and we have free alternatives.
preferably
Package: doctorj
Severity: important
User: pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: kaffe-removal
Hi
We are considering to remove kaffe from the repositories, since upstream is
dead, it lacks active maintaince from our side and we have free alternatives.
preferably you should
Package: lintian
Version: 2.4.4
Hi
I examined the source of lintian (pulled from git) and noticed that
lintian could probably benefit from looking at common access patterns.
In the checks, there are 13 accesses to 'keys %{$info-index}'; 11 of
these are 'sort keys %{$info-index}'. This means
Interestingly enough this does not appear to be the current bottle
neck of lintian (or I am doing something wrong in my patch).
~Niels
$ dpkg --contents eclipse-platform-data_3.5.2-8_all.deb | wc -l
1480
lintian 2.4.3
$ for i in {1..5} ; do time lintian -EI --pedantic
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Niels Thykier nthyk...@gmail.com writes:
Interestingly enough this does not appear to be the current bottle neck
of lintian (or I am doing something wrong in my patch).
It's probably a good change regardless, but sorting
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Raphael Geissert geiss...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Niels!
[OT but using the opportunity: congrats! :)]
Thanks :)
Niels Thykier wrote:
Interestingly enough this does not appear to be the current bottle
neck of lintian (or I am doing something wrong in my patch
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Niels Thykier nthyk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm... could be interesting to see if we could do something about
that. If time permits I will have a look.
~Niels
I guess I had time! Trivial testing on the eclipse-platform-data shows
that neither objdump-info[1
Package: lintian
Version: 2.4.4
test output:
...
Running test distribution-ubuntu-native 1.0... building... testing... FAILED:
--- t/tests/distribution-ubuntu-native/tags 2010-08-03
15:05:07.354069756 +0200
+++ debian/tests/tags.distribution-ubuntu-native2010-12-07
23:21:50.378531654
tags 582767 + patch
thanks
Hi
I have created a patch that implements this check with a small test case for it.
~Niels
From 0bd1d202b0f46598eff33cd8d522161c1e5f37ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:48:52 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Added check
Hi
I attended the Fedora meeting today and learning that Fedora is doing
a tomcat5-tomcat6 transition.
Some of there work may be useful for us; so here is there tracker bug[1].
~Niels
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640397
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
tags 595941 + patch
thanks
Made a patch for it and included a small test case for the tag.
~Niels
From 577a7ca9453a24f7fdba2eb5ba19a93c9839e3a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 16:21:28 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix false-positive with extra
Java Development Kits (which is a waste of time on the buildd machines)
From f9a5e2fafc22c6f8766bb8755f8c3b8f6badbc3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 21:50:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Deprecate default-jdk-builddep and correct list of packages
Package: henplus
Severity: Important
Hi
I was wondering if you would be interested in either a co-maintainer
or maintaining henplus in a team (e.g. the Java Team)? Based #526898,
henplus has been unusable since May 2009 and I think it is better long
term solution to find additional maintainers
Package: lintian
Version: 2.4.3
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey
Check for symbol files referring to non-existent or foreign packages.
libbaz3.so libfoo #MINVER#
~Niels
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey
Right, there is a check for that... but:
cat t/tests/shared-libs-non-pic-i386/debian/debian/symbols:
libbaz3.so libfilo #MINVER#
p...@base 1.0
does not trigger an issue and I cannot figure out why! I am fairly
confident that something is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-12-28 23:56, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 22:04 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
Check for symbol files referring to non-existent or foreign packages.
libbaz3.so libfoo #MINVER#
That's what the catchily named
symbols
tags 568347 + upstream
thanks
Hi Brain and sorry for the delay in replying to you.
I have decided to forward your request and your patch upstream. If they
accept it, I will apply to the Debian package.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tags: patch
See http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1037779
(sorry for double mail to pkg-java list)
On 2010-12-29 18:29, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Package: tomcat6
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Hi,
the following CVE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey
I have had a look at this nearly 2 year old bug and I think it would be
great if we could find a solution for cross-package checks. To make it
even better I am interested in working on this. That being said I have
not work on Lintian for very
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-04 08:59, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Package: lintian
Version: 2.4.3
Severity: normal
Hi,
Hey,
in the pkg-games SVN repository I have modified the rott package to build an
additional variant of the game that plays the CD Site
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey Lintian maintainers
Do any of you know if we really have a false-positive here? If we do, I
can work on applying the patch and testing it.
~Niels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-04 19:07, Russ Allbery wrote:
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
Excluding all binaries and known scripts might be a good idea, but I
have not deployed that change. Perhaps some of the other Lintian
maintainers can comment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-06 01:01, Russ Allbery wrote:
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
I am considering to just make the switch to use Email::Valid. I have
attached a patch that makes the switch and introduces a regression test
to catch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-06 01:15, Russ Allbery wrote:
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
I have had a look at this nearly 2 year old bug and I think it would be
great if we could find a solution for cross-package checks. To make it
even better I am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-06 01:01, Russ Allbery wrote:
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
I am considering to just make the switch to use Email::Valid. I have
attached a patch that makes the switch and introduces a regression test
to catch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-06 18:27, Russ Allbery wrote:
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
[...]
That is, if I run:
lintian A.deb B.deb A-data.deb B-data.deb
should lintian then do A + A-data and then B + B-data or just in
whatever order it feels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-06 20:18, Russ Allbery wrote:
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
Speaking of unpacking; as I understand it we once had an unpack-level
2 which has now been removed in favour of collection. I am considering
to remove the unpack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
Sorry for the late reply to this. The tag already refers to the
doc-base manual:
Refer to Debian doc-base Manual section 2.3.3 (The section field) for
details.
Which contains a list of valid sections. Unfortunately I cannot seem to
find an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
tags 602632 + pending
thanks
Hi
Thanks for the heads up and the patch, which has been applied.
~Niels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
tags 608810 + pending
thanks
Hi
I have applied the patch with the modification that any objects.inv file
in a subdir of usr/share/doc/$pkg will trigger the tag instead of just
$pkg/html/. I did this because my sample case python-kinterbasdb
] http://pkg-java.alioth.debian.org/
[2] http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/henplus.html
Browser:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/cvsdebuild/trunk/debian/dists/henplus/
Thanks!
You are welcome :)
2011/1/19 Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Piotr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-21 13:14, Michael Kay wrote:
The observation is quite correct. However, Saxon 6.5.5 is a mature
release (the last Saxon release on the XSLT 1.0 branch) and there are no
plans to issue any further maintenance releases on this branch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-21 18:55, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
2011/1/21 Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-21 17:26, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
[...]
I was thinking of putting under the pkg-java Team[1
PZdnPg9fht6Yt7gzlb3qZpsXvwVO8gwOkj216P8NxNoPcMGKme8mKJLg4uiiuWl7
N8QXBGQLY6h2bPpQ/0oRpLjdlTRR+zTipd63X2JwlUYbIylFfOWIBZr6h2cT4VW3
ciq8QNEoNAXWr4M6bihc
=1gld
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
From e57fd7bdafc116700902967fe0a90167d2ebcb91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Date: Tue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
A modified patch with a few corrections and also a and X other files
message instead of a tag for each file. Note I removed the changelog
entry since it conflicted.
On the technical level - is fcron really a full replacement of cron
and not
:
DEBEMAIL=ni...@thykier.net
DEBFULLNAME=Niels Thykier
DEBNAME=Niels Thykier
INTERFACE=text
** ~/.reportbugrc:
reportbug_version 4.6
mode expert
ui text
realname Niels Thykier
email ni...@thykier.net
sign gpg
keyid 7D806442
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT prefers testing
APT
Package: desktop-base
Version: 6.0.5
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
I hear that desktop-base uses sync in the postinst and that it has a valid
reason for doing so. That being said, the postinst does not have any inline
documentation/comments clarifying
Package: eclipse-platform
Version: 3.5.2-6squeeze1
Severity: important
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
These are reported as CVE-2008-7271 and CVE-2010-4647, which appear to be the
(nearly) same issue. Upstream has fixed this with [1] and has made its way
into
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-02-02 08:40, Niels Thykier wrote:
Package: eclipse-platform
Version: 3.5.2-6squeeze1
Severity: important
Tags: security
Hi
These are reported as CVE-2008-7271 and CVE-2010-4647, which appear to be the
(nearly) same issue
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: lpg-generator-java
Version : 2.0.20
Upstream Author : Philippe Charles pgchar...@users.sourceforge.net
* URL : http
Package: javahelper
Version: 0.32
Severity: minor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey
I noticed if a package has a native version, then jh_installlibs tries to use
- as version. I am not sure how much sense it makes for us to create a
native Java package with a public library
Package: piuparts
Version: 0.38
Severity: minor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey
[1] lists all the packages that succeeded, but contains command not found.
Unfortunately, this triggers on [2], where this text is merely a part of the
package description.
It might be a good
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-02-08 16:34, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Matthew Palmer wrote...
W: pbuilder: manpage-has-errors-from-man
usr/share/man/man1/debuild-pbuilder.1.gz can't set the locale; make sure
$LC_* and $LANG are correct
This puzzled me too, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-02-10 08:17, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Niels Thykier wrote...
Thanks for the hint; can you try to pull lintian from git and try if it
is fixed (commit 285c6c4) ?
That would be
http://git.debian.org/?p=lintian/lintian.git;a=commitdiff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
severity 612738 serious
tags 612738 + confirmed
thanks
On 2011-02-10 12:12, Martin Gallant wrote:
Package: eclipse-platform
Version: 3.5.2-8
Severity: important
Tags: sid
eclipse-platform : Depends: sat4j ( 2.2.1) but 2.2.3-1 is to be
Package: java-wrappers
Version: 0.1.16
Severity: minor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey
I noticed that jvm-list.sh (in the svn as well) lists a lot of old JVMs that
are no longer in Debian. If you want to keep them in the file (e.g. for
compatibility) it might be prudent to
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
As the title says - also see #581024. As far as I can tell from
build-rdeps and apt-cache rdepends there are no more dependencies
left on libservlet2.3-java (the only binary package of
javax-servletapi2.3)
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.9.1.0
Severity: minor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey
The example in 4.9.1 suggests to set CFLAGS in a way that completely
overrides values from dpkg-buildpackage/dpkg-buildflags[1]:
CFLAGS = -Wall -g
This will set CFLAGS to -Wall -g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-02-12 22:32, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 14:25:40 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.9.1.0
Severity: minor
Hey
The example in 4.9.1 suggests to set CFLAGS in a way that completely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-02-23 23:23, Jakub Wilk wrote:
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.0~rc1
$PYTHON_DEPEND is supposed to contain lists of alternatives of packages
that ensure /usr/bin/python will exist. However, the list contains e.g.
python2.6, which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-02-25 15:27, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Package: lintian
Version: 2.4.3
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice if lintian.d.o could provide, for each tag-specific page
(e.g.
tags 599967 - experimental
thanks
Hi
I disagree that this bug is experimental only, since it affects ia64
and sparc in unstable. Also it partly blocks getting the fix for
#545625 migrated into testing.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Package: lintian
Version: 2.4.3
Hey
$ lintian -IE ./openjdk-6-jdk_6b18-1.8.2-4_i386.deb
triggers 28 of these; all of them appears to be applications and not
shared libraries (installed in /usr/lib/jvm/folder/bin/app).
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: lintian
Version: 2.4.3
Tags: patch
Hi
Bumped DH compat to7 and B-D to 7.0.50~ since tests are run during
build and some tests use override_ targets.
~Niels
From 26b818c7e66e1a240a5fb5eb7c1734465c406154 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Date: Tue, 21 Dec
fc2b57a06006276e63a88df62839e6eb1a7f1859 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:42:33 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Added some tests to improve coverage.
---
t/tests/rules-not-makefile/debian/debian/rules | 11 +++
t/tests/rules-not-makefile/desc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
tags 528001 - patch
thanks
Hi
It appears that all the patches here have been applied. I have not
closed it because I assumed it was still open since there is no check
for (e.g.) d/source/include-binaries.
~Niels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
Thanks for the report; it turns out that lintian already has a check for
substvars (tag: diff-contains-substvars). Unfortunately it only
checked for debian/substvars, which made it somewhat useless on
multi-binary packages.
I have extended
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey
I have removed those directories from data/shared-libs/ldconfig-dirs.
I suspect this would also make emul an unusal top-level directory as
well, but I would like someone to confirm this assertion before I act on it.
~Niels
-BEGIN PGP
/Y2PymASg6Uo5o70ViPCZltUfunhJP
9TzI5IjOv4/EfPIRGd2B00djttG8RN/RzaVgM6ulE0HtWhV6T4mQhLi6w8hT5I0B
Kef/NQEHTesSDp58DcGK
=ruxU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
From 9a0a22bc0447f56ce9781a1ab24dc5e9d327f3dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 18:17:17 +0100
Subject: [PATCH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
I am considering to just make the switch to use Email::Valid. I have
attached a patch that makes the switch and introduces a regression test
to catch the particular issue in #602619.
~Niels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-12-24 18:51, Russ Allbery wrote:
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
I have removed those directories from data/shared-libs/ldconfig-dirs.
I suspect this would also make emul an unusal top-level directory as
well, but I would like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
Looks like Debian does not have appmenu-gtk, so removing the export
should work without complications. I will have a look at this for the
next upload.
~Niels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-02-27 04:22, Charles Plessy wrote:
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.0~rc1
Severity: normal
Hello everybody,
I just tested lintian 2.5.0~rc1 and found a false positive for the tag
unneeded-build-dep-on-quilt. The package that triggered
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-03-04 23:05, Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.0~rc1
Severity: normal
User: debian-d...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
While building my multi-arch dpkg I noted this:
I: dpkg: unknown-field-in-control
Package: gcj-jdk
Version: 4:4.4.5-2
Severity: minor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey
I noticed that dh_nativejava/aotcompile does not cope very well if
the jar file contains a : (e.g. from a version number). It seems
that it uses make at some point with a pattern that cannot
Package: javahelper
Version: 0.32
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
As the subject says. jh_installlibs thinks that the upstream version
of 1:6.5.5-3 is 1:6.5.5.
~Niels
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy:
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.0~rc1
Severity: minor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
W: liblicense3: extra-license-file usr/lib/liblicense.so.3.0.0
Maybe we should ignore ELF files or things with SONAMES :)
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.0~rc1
Severity: minor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
s...@latin.po is a valid po-file at least for Squeeze and newer. Adam
said that Lenny is unable to handle it. Not sure if we should fix it
now or wait until Lenny is EOL'ed.
~Niels
- --
llP9DLK5v20HmH4jOUZTYiX5xrWDYIYXoaA3ane7eThQx9M8zC8xv8kW1r4eLvku
a9u14LMxlJgPzbX2xU9URZroohgO4hj6ietJmmGFCNpboTfhNMZyFfz8rZvpMyJt
qgximBlf7SH1VDU1kBaf
=sLkT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
From dc78d3a49ad800349153973ed5dd84e1952edc18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Date: Sun, 9
/TEwLRYLQ6Ay1pfEB21dAPiyjneEtqRh
Mv+RzrBVAzOmpLF0fqZnSv1Gzwz0RuTC8gHo/S0V5SJZmkEEAvnzdHRQ6iQbu2FA
XhHLq0or3r1Ng4tzmMZk
=OEv1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
From fe0157d6214cb335d09b8ba486d06a78a6e914b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:38:27 +0100
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
clone 604047 -1
severity 604047 important
tags 604047 confirmed
retitle -1 lintian: running jobs are not always stopped
owner -1 !
severity -1 important
tags -1 confirmed
thanks
Hey Andreas
Thanks for the bug reports. I have split your original
82ff2e6fb189f64616eb1c646c94d44fb4ba9336 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:01:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Improved checks for python bytecode and eggs
Renamed package-installs-python-pyc to package-installs-python-bytecode
and added package-installs-python-pycache-dir plus
package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey,
I have to admit that I agree with Mike that it really does not make
sense to override those tags (especially not now that we have Team Uploads).
That being said... With the FTP master auto-rejects we actually do have
non-overrideable tags now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
tags 595530 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi
Lintian already appears to ignore symlinks for this check. I think
Lintian correctly emits these tags for tipa/2:1.3-14. Looking at the
contents they appear to be real files and not symlinks.
Let me know if you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
I second the idea of phasing out source packages the old tar-in-tar,
starting with a should (not) or a Recommend (against). :)
~Niels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-18 03:23, Russ Allbery wrote:
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
I guess I am biting the bullet now. It turns out that with the
pre-sorting stuff, some of the checks (e.g. checks/binaries) now modify
the list when they add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-17 21:45, Russ Allbery wrote:
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
objdump -T --headers --private-headers looks the same as well in both
cases (but it still exits 1 in experimental). Removing the -T will make
it succeed and I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Piotr
Little over a month ago, I asked if you were willing to put henplus
under team maintance or accept a Co-maintainer. I am yet to see a reply
- - if you have replied in private, I have missed your email (please
resend it in that case).
Package: lintian
Version: 2.3.1
Severity: wishlist
Hi
Currently lintian.d.o allows me to see either all the packages maintained
by my team or all packages affected by a given tag. Would it be possible
to get all packages maintained by $X and with tag $Y as well?
~Niels
-- System Information:
tags 558246 + confirmed
thanks
Yann Dirson wrote:
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.4.1-1
Severity: important
When one has both stable and unstable sources, eclipse from unstable
tries to pull eclipse-gcj from stable, which does not work and
generates conflicts.
The same seems to hold for
notfound 558178 0.1.42-1
close 558178
thanks
As bdefreese noted this was already fixed in a previous version.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
notfound 558189 2.1.1-1
close 558189
thanks
Hi
sat4j already had the OSGi metadata; sorry for the noise.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: lucene2
Severity: important
Hi
A recent upload of lucene2 fixed #555225; but did not mention that
this fixed CVE-2007-2383. This causes the security tracker to
believe that lucene2 is still affected.
Therefore please mention that CVE-2007-2383 has been fixed in the
changelog on next
Hi Jan-Pascal
I believe this is what Torsten Werner did with jetty a few uploads
back[1] and then passed -v to dpkg-genchanges/dpkg-buildpackage; but I
am actually not sure if this is all there is too it.
~Niels
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/jetty/news/20090906T213439Z.html
Yann Dirson wrote:
Hi,
Any news on this ? Do you need some help testing the 3.5 packages ?
(note that because of this update problem I had to dl the eclipse.org
version, but that I have some problems with it ;)
___
pkg-java-maintainers
Hi
I would also like -doc to be added to the special case list or/and any
(binary) package in Section: docs [1].
~Niels
[1] liblucene2-java-doc recommends ant-doc causes false postive as well:
http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org.html#lucene2
Hi
I am not sure how to handle the OSGi for lucene2. The obvious answer
would be to append it to the manifest files after they have been
generated; however I have checked lucene from Fedora and they discard
the generated Manifests in favor of their own handmade ones. This is
looks like a much
tags 558693 + confirmed
thanks
Hi
I know some people have experienced this e.g. by having translation
packages for eclipse installed (there is a bug about this on the Ubuntu
side requesting that the default limit is increased).
You can work around this by changing the limit of open files. (e.g.
Package: cowbuilder
Version: 0.58
Severity: serious
Hi
Running cowbuilder with --login --bindmounts results in cowbuilder trying to
purge
a bindmounted /proc if the command-line specified bindmount fails.
$ sudo cowbuilder --login --bindmounts `pwd`/aginw
- Copying COW directory
forking: rm
Hi
How is it going with this package? Do you need a hand?
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tags + 299635 wontfix
thanks
Hi
Thank you for your suggestion and sorry for not replying sooner.
While your idea is good, we have decided not to implement your
suggestion fully at the current time. However, we have implemented some
of your ideas (namely letting other variables depend on the
1 - 100 of 4380 matches
Mail list logo
