Bug#710532: this bug is fixed in 1.8.6.3 version

Please untag this bug - it was already fixed in the version 1.8.6.3. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#710532: This bug has been already fixed in 1.8.6.3

Justin, could you please untag this bug ? We already fixed it in v1.8.6.3, according to your suggestions. But this bug is still hanging over the package. How to mark it fixed or else ? Thanks Oleg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#705064: ITP: rfc5766-turn-server - STUN/TURN server

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist The TURN Server is a VoIP media traffic NAT traversal server and gateway. It can be used as a general-purpose network traffic TURN server/gateway, too. This implementation also includes some extra features. Supported RFCs: TURN specs: - RFC 5766 - base TURN

Bug#710532: rfc5766-turn-server: broken synopsis

I accepted all suggested by Justin changes, except that I made the first line even shorter (I made it just TURN and STUN server for VoIP). I mention the source of the changes in the changelong file. I put the changes into 1.8.5.3-2 package version and uploaded it:

Bug#737763: provide: turn-server, stun-server and suggests: sip-router, xmpp-server

OK, I'll do. Oleg On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote: Package: rfc5766-turn-server Consider adding some variation of the following to the control file: Suggests: sip-router, xmpp-server Provides: stun-server, turn-server

Bug#737763: provide: turn-server, stun-server and suggests: sip-router, xmpp-server

I pushed a fix to this bug, in git. Oleg On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote: Package: rfc5766-turn-server Consider adding some variation of the following to the control file: Suggests: sip-router, xmpp-server Provides: stun-server, turn-server

Bug#735044: Add Oleg Moskalenko as a Debian Maintainer

Package: debian-maintainers Severity: normal Please add Oleg Moskalenko to the debian maintainer keyring. Thank you, Oleg add-030622245C1E59B4 Description: Binary data

Bug#747010: Add new package coturn to Debian

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist The COTURN TURN Server is a VoIP media traffic NAT traversal server. It extends the rfc5766-turn-server beyond the RFC 5766 TURN specs. It adds a multi-tenant implementation, and it will eventually include all

Bug#747010: link to the coturn package

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 http://mentors.debian.net/package/coturn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTZvp5AAoJEAMGIiRcHlm0Y5wIAJ7ucdGDiNZGzb6xXpADRzY0

Bug#747010: link to the coturn package at mentors

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 http://mentors.debian.net/package/coturn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTZvtPAAoJEAMGIiRcHlm0PNcH/jMxNxvxkP/HFAwK72LDAp+2

Bug#519183: [rt.debian.org #5523] : please add my new 4096-bits gpg key

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 11/24/2014 08:57 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor via RT wrote: On 11/24/2014 11:42 AM, Daniel Pocock via RT wrote: URL: https://rt.debian.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=5523 On 24/11/14 17:24, Oleg Moskalenko wrote: I am using Icedove with Enigmail

Bug#804440: SSLv3 support will be removed

I'll remove the SSLv3 support from coturn, that will fix the bug. Thanks Oleg

Bug#800544: coturn: Please allow telnet-ssl being installed instead of telnet

Hi Axel I’ll do that in 4.5.0.2-3 version. Thanks Oleg On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:55:18 +0200 Axel Beckert wrote: > Package: coturn > Severity: wishlist > Version: 4.2.1.2-1 > Control: found -1 4.5.0.2-1 > > Dear Daniel and Oleg, > > coturn currently depends on "telnet". telnet

Bug#828271: openssl 1.1.0 problem

Hi Kurt I do not think that this is coturn's problem. OpenSSL 1.1.0 is not backward compatible with previous versions, and this is their problem. Having two separate code versions for pre-1.1 release and for 1.1 is not practical. I'd suggest that you have to contact openssl folks and ask them to

Bug#828271: OpenSSL 1.10 compatibility

I am going to add compatibility in the next package release. We still have to support the previous OpenSSL versions, so that is somewhat ugly.

Bug#846649: closed by Oleg Moskalenko <mom040...@gmail.com> (846649 to be closed)

Jonas, Please test it and let us know. All crashes of this sort are in 99% due to the OpenSSL incompatibilities. Thanks Oleg On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Jonas Meurer wrote: > Am 13.12.2016 um 00:50 schrieb Jonas Meurer: > >> Am 13.12.2016 um 00:45 schrieb Debian

Bug#846649: Squeeze ?

I am not sure that I understand why this binary package is used with Squeeze, regardless of the kernel. This package is extensively using OpenSSL and it is very sensitive to the binary compatibility with OpenSSL libraries. The errors look exactly like something is wrong with the OpenSSL libraries