Bug#494674: Any news about integrating a tomcat6?

2008-09-02 Thread Onkar Shinde
Thanks to work of Thierry Carrez [EMAIL PROTECTED], tomcat 6 is packaged in Ubuntu Intrepid release. Can anyone please work on adopting it to Debian? Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#417888:

2008-07-21 Thread Onkar Shinde
Both batik 1.7 (waiting in NEW queue) and its dependency xml-commons-external are uploaded in Ubuntu 8.10 repositories. It will be great if someone can adopt these packages in Debian. Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#417888:

2008-07-21 Thread Onkar Shinde
I've done quite a good amount of work on batik already for debian - I haven't looked at the work done in ubuntu yet. However, I had not realized yet the need to xml-commons-external (it took me a very long time to get batik to build...). I'm having a look right now, and I'll import it as

Bug#498584: Missing build dependency 'ant'

2008-09-11 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: bytecode bytecode fails to build currently on Ubuntu build servers.[1] The reason is that the build dependency ant is missing. Can you please fix this problem, so that I can simply file a sync request then in Ubuntu. Also last changelog entry has made it a native package. Please fix

Bug#480536:

2008-09-12 Thread Onkar Shinde
Is anyone working on this. We have already released 1.3.4 and planning to do 1.3.5 within a week. We would prefer to sync/merge package in Ubuntu from Debian. Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#460449: kdissert: Please use dh_icons to update icon cache

2008-01-12 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: kdissert Version: 1.0.7-1 Severity: normal Please modify the rules file to include dh_icons for updating icons cache. This will also need debhelper version bump to = 5.0.51. Attached is the debdiff. kdissert_1.0.7-2.debdiff Description: Binary data

Bug#423087:

2008-01-15 Thread Onkar Shinde
The problem is that the DTD can not be used for validation in programs (at least java applications). The reason is that the program tries to find entity sets in same directory as DTD since the DTD contains only file names and not full path. Is there any solution for this other than having

Bug#459279: libcommons-lang-java: 'ant' is missing from 'Build-Depends'

2008-01-05 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: libcommons-lang-java Version: 2.3-3 Severity: important 'ant' is missing from build dependencies. This causes FTBFS in pbuilder. Debdiff is attached on launchpad bug 180502. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#423087:

2008-01-26 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Jan 22, 2008 11:18 PM, Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 20:49 +0530 schrieb Onkar Shinde: The problem is that the DTD can not be used for validation in programs (at least java applications). The reason is that the program tries to find entity sets

Bug#423087:

2008-05-28 Thread Onkar Shinde
The problem is resolved in the Ubuntu version in hardy (8.04) in acceptable way (IMO), even if you don't agree it is a problem. I will be glad if the fix will be merged in Debian. Regards, Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#525946: hw-detect: snd-powermac not added to /etc/modules

2009-04-27 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: hw-detect Severity: normal I recently installed Debian lenny on my ibook G4 (powerpc). Please refer installation report in bug #525902. After the installation was complete and I booted into Debian, I found out that sound was not working. The problem is that snd-powermac module is not

Bug#525946: hw-detect: snd-powermac not added to /etc/modules

2009-04-28 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote: Hello Onkar, I believe that this patch should fix the detection at installer. I'm also attaching the test.sh script that I'd like you to run and see if it does shows snd-aoa being registered. I belive it should

Bug#525946: hw-detect: snd-powermac not added to /etc/modules

2009-04-28 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote: Hello Onkar, On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Onkar Shinde onkarshi...@ubuntu.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote: Hello Onkar, I believe that this patch

Bug#517348:

2009-09-22 Thread Onkar Shinde
Now that libjgrapht-java is moved to main and the package is renamed to libjgrapht0.6-java can someone please fix the build and runtime dependencies of cdk? Please also fix bug 546306. Cheers, Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#547969: ivy jar not added to ant lib

2009-09-22 Thread Onkar Shinde
Ant upstream authors recommend using classpath attribute for optional ant tasks when defining the task in build.xml.[1] Hence the symlink should not be present in ant's library. Also the symlink modifies the default classpath of ant which will cause problem if user wants to use another version of

Bug#531621:

2009-09-24 Thread Onkar Shinde
Any update on this issue? Unfortunately I could not get access to a i386 machine to check side effects of the patch if any. Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#505877: ITP: jakarta-jmeter -- Load testing and performance measurement application.

2008-11-16 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Onkar Shinde [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: jakarta-jmeter Version : 2.3.2 Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation * URL : http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/ * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Java

Bug#506144: libjson-java should depend on commons, ezmorph

2008-11-18 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: libjson-java Following bug is reported in Ubuntu.[1] Since the package version in Ubuntu is same as in Debian, I thought it was better to forward the bug. *** libjson-java requires a number of other libraries, but it fails to Depends on any of them. The package should

Bug#506782: Patch 81_prevent-network-access.dpatch is not needed anymore

2008-11-24 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: lucene2 Version: 2.4.0+ds1-1 In file contrib/highlighter/src/test/org/apache/lucene/search/highlight/HighlighterTest.java, the xml snippet in the text testEncoding does not have reference to a DTD anymore. So this unit test does not need any network access to execute. Hence patch

Bug#506782: Patch 81_prevent-network-access.dpatch is not needed anymore

2008-11-26 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: severity 506782 minor thanks Hi, Onkar Shinde wrote: Package: lucene2 Version: 2.4.0+ds1-1 Why is this a normal bug? ;-) I wasn't sure of the priority. In file contrib/highlighter/src/test/org/apache/lucene

Bug#561177: RFS: cobertura

2010-01-27 Thread Onkar Shinde
I have one question about this package. Is there any particular reason why you created the package from scratch instead of basing it on the cobertura package from Ubuntu? Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#562437: Please find attached the patch

2010-01-30 Thread Onkar Shinde
tags 562437 patch thanks Please find attached a debdiff against current version archive. This patch ports the Ubuntu changes to Debian which essentially fixes this bug and few other minor changes. Regards, Onkar -- Passion - Some people climb mountains - others write Free software. Don't ask

Bug#558999: FTBFS [hppa] - recompile with -ffunction-sections

2009-12-01 Thread Onkar Shinde
I am not very good at GCC optimizations. Can you please explain why this problem is not seen on other architectures? Also can you please advise if I should add this compiler option for all arch or just hppa. Thanks, Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#559766: java3d: FTBFS on non-Linux ports

2009-12-07 Thread Onkar Shinde
Thanks for the patch. I had already worked on a solution that solves current problem. But going forward the compilation fails as java3d uses some Sun specific APIs which are not available in anything other than openjdk (considering packages in main). Openjdk is not available on kfreebsd

Bug#558999: Build still fails

2010-01-10 Thread Onkar Shinde
reopen 558999 thanks The bug is not fixed even with latest changes in packaging. It looks like compiler flag set from debian/rules file is not getting used by the build system. The build still fails with same error on hppa. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#543103: Please find attached the patch

2010-02-07 Thread Onkar Shinde
Please find attached debdiff that fixes this bug and other build problems with the package. Onkar maven-embedder_2.0.4-1.1.debdiff Description: Binary data

Bug#504425: Please fix these packaging problems

2008-11-03 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: jftp Version: 1.51~pre4-2 I was planning to port the packaging changes I did in Ubuntu for jftp to Debian this week. But Varun has already done most of the changes in 1.51~pre4-2 (in NEW queue). Following are some changes I believe are still remaining. All comments welcome. 1.

Bug#504425: Please fix these packaging problems

2008-11-03 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Varun Hiremath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Onkar, On Tue, 04 Nov, 2008 at 01:39:38AM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: Package: jftp Version: 1.51~pre4-2 I was planning to port the packaging changes I did in Ubuntu for jftp to Debian this week. But Varun has

Bug#504425: Please fix these packaging problems

2008-11-04 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:48:16AM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: Exception in thread main java.lang.NullPointerException at net.sf.jftp.gui.base.StatusPanel.init(StatusPanel.java:79) at net.sf.jftp.JFtp.init(JFtp.java

Bug#503780: - electric: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-11-08 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tags 503780 + pending thanks, Hi Onkar, is the package ready for upload? Do you need a sponsor? Yes. It is available in pkg-java svn trunk. I have not yet tagged the new revision. I have already mailed debian-java

Bug#505028: robocode depends directly on openjdk

2008-11-08 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: robocode Version: 1.6.1~beta2-2 Following bug is reported in Ubuntu. [1] The version in Ubuntu is same as the version in Debian. So I thought it would be better to forwarded the bug to Debian. Bug description in Ubuntu: Robocode depends directly on openjdk-jre, although it should run

Bug#504425:

2008-11-09 Thread Onkar Shinde
Varun/Kumar, I just checked the latest jftp source in pkg-java svn. I believe the file names have been wrongly swapped. README.source is supposed to talk about patch system. But it talks about removal of jar files to create orig.tar.gz. IIRC, README.Debian is supposed to talk about removal of jar

Bug#505321: Please remove package from archive

2008-11-11 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: libjaxp1.2-java Please remove the package from repositories for following reasons. 1. There are no rdepends on this package except libjaxp1.2-java-gcj which is created from same source. 2. Even the libjaxp1.3-java has got 'End Of Life' since Februrary 2008. [1] So there is no point

Bug#505315: ImageJ chooses wrong java home

2008-11-11 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: imagej Following bug is reported in Ubuntu by Peter Husen. [1] *** ImageJ fails to run on an amd64 system if ia32-sun-java6-bin is installed. It fails with the error message Running a 64-bit JVM is not supported on this platform. This seems to be due to the script

Bug#505582: Multiple packaging problems

2008-11-13 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: fop Version: 1:0.95.dfsg-1 I have found following problems with the fop package from experimental, version 1:0.95.dfsg-1. One of them is present in the version in unstable/testing as well and was reported in Ubuntu in Intrepid development cycle. 1. Bump libxmlgraphics-commons-java

Bug#505601: Compile for target JVM version 1.4

2008-11-13 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: libjogl-java Version: 1.1.1+dak1-3 The library does not use any Java 5 or 6 specific features. Hence it should be compiled for target JVM 1.4 so it is compatible with more runtimes. Simply adding following line to debian/rules should be sufficient. ANT_OPTS :=

Bug#541111: ITP: excalibur-logkit -- Lightweight and fast designed logging toolkit for Java

2009-08-11 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Onkar Shinde onkarshi...@ubuntu.com * Package name: excalibur-logkit Version : 2.0 Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation * URL : http://excalibur.apache.org/ * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Java

Bug#541124: ITP: excalibur-logger -- Excalibur project's log management system

2009-08-11 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Onkar Shinde onkarshi...@ubuntu.com * Package name: excalibur-logger Version : 2.1 Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation * URL : http://excalibur.apache.org/ * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Java

Bug#505877: ITP: jakarta-jmeter -- Load testing and performance measurement application.

2009-08-12 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Onkar Shindeonkarshi...@ubuntu.com wrote: Here is an update. Both excalibur-logkit and excalibur-logger are in Ubuntu archive for next version (karmic). I should be done with jmeter hopefully by end of next week. After that I will port all these packages to

Bug#505877: ITP: jakarta-jmeter -- Load testing and performance measurement application.

2009-08-12 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Jan Wagnerw...@cyconet.org wrote: Hi Onkar, On Wednesday 12 August 2009 13:37:19 you wrote: Jmeter has landed in Ubuntu. You can search and download the packages from http://packages.ubuntu.com. You will need to manually install libexcalibur-logkit-java and

Bug#542392: azureus: Refuses to start

2009-08-19 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Jan Willem Stumpeljstum...@planet.nl wrote: Package: azureus Version: 4.2.0.4-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I have openjdk-6-jre installed, because azureus used to depend on it. openjdk works fine with other java applications as

Bug#543327: junit4 has dropped ant jar

2009-08-24 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Antti-Juhani Kaijanahoantti-juh...@kaijanaho.fi wrote: On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:21:21PM +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: BTW, I think there was a classpath conflict between : /usr/share/ant/lib/junit4.jar (4.7) and /usr/share/ant/lib/junit.jar (3.8.7) Both

Bug#543327: junit4 has dropped ant jar

2009-08-24 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Antti-Juhani Kaijanahoantti-juh...@kaijanaho.fi wrote: On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 05:34:10PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: Please do not add the link again. If this ends up being the result, a NEWS.Debian entry would be appropriate, since I'm likely not the only one

Bug#543327: junit4 has dropped ant jar

2009-08-24 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Antti-Juhani Kaijanahoantti-juh...@kaijanaho.fi wrote: On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 05:46:07PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: How about specify the relative path like ${lib.dir}/junit.jar so that lib.dir can be overridden by the package maintainer in the debian/rules

Bug#531416: omegat: Missing dependency (libaccess-bridge-java-jni)

2009-06-01 Thread Onkar Shinde
Omegat needs libaccess-bridge-java-jni but it is missing in dependencies. Can you please provide more explanation? Why does omegat need libaccess-bridge-java-jni? What kind of problems are you facing in the absence of this dependency? Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#531662:

2009-06-03 Thread Onkar Shinde
Subject: jruby1.1: Please merge packaging changes from Ubuntu if possible Package: jruby1.1 Version: 1.1.6-2 Severity: normal *** Please type your report below this line *** Please merge following packaging changes from Ubuntu if possible. 1. Change build dependency java6-sdk to default-jdk. I

Bug#532065: java-gcj-compat-dev: Fails to install inside pbuilder chroot

2009-06-06 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev Version: 1.0.80-5 Severity: important While trying to check if jruby1.1 builds with default-jdk build dependency, I got following error in pbuilder chroot. Setting up java-gcj-compat-dev (1.0.80-5) ... update-alternatives: error: alternative path

Bug#532122: javahelper: Fails to install in sid, broken dependency on icepick

2009-06-06 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: javahelper Version: 0.18 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.2 In unstable distribution or unstable chroot, the package fails to install. The reason being that it declares dependency on icepick which is removed from unstable. Please check following links for clarification about

Bug#531662: closed by Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org (Bug#531662: fixed in jruby1.2 1.2.0-2)

2009-06-08 Thread Onkar Shinde
Sebastien, I had logged this bug against jruby1.1. Can you please fix it there too? Or are you planning to ask for removal of jruby1.1 form archives? Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#537071: Wrong versions for build dependencies

2009-07-14 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: gupnp-tools Version: 0.7.1-1 Severity: important The build dependency libglib2.0-dev has version specified as = 2.16. But looking at configure script the minimum version required is actually 2.12 (GIO_REQUIRED=2.12). Also libgtk2.0-dev needs to be = 2.16 (GTK_REQUIRED=2.16) but there is

Bug#532378:

2009-07-14 Thread Onkar Shinde
The latest upstream version required java 1.6 to build and run. This will limit the users to only using openjdk-6-jre or sun-java6-jre. In my opinion, for now we should simply upload the experimental version to unstable. Another question that came to my mind is, do we really need versioned

Bug#537934: javahelper forces dependency on gcj and fastjar

2009-07-21 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: javatools Version: 0.20 Severity: Important javahelper has runtime dependencies gcj and fastjar. Looking at the source it does not look like it specifically needs those packages. Please correct me if I am wrong. Having these dependencies means that GCJ is installed even if user already

Bug#537934: javahelper forces dependency on gcj and fastjar

2009-07-21 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Matthew Johnsonmj...@debian.org wrote: On Wed Jul 22 01:23, Onkar Shinde wrote: javahelper has runtime dependencies gcj and fastjar. Looking at the source it does not look like it specifically needs those packages. Please correct me if I am wrong. Having

Bug#505877: ITP: jakarta-jmeter -- Load testing and performance measurement application.

2009-07-22 Thread Onkar Shinde
Here is an update. Both excalibur-logkit and excalibur-logger are in Ubuntu archive for next version (karmic). I should be done with jmeter hopefully by end of next week. After that I will port all these packages to Debian. Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#531621:

2009-07-22 Thread Onkar Shinde
I can verify that the patch attached to the bug fixes the issue for me on powerpc (ibook G4). The playback does not work at all in totem before applying the patch. I am using totem packages form experimental and with this patch I can have complete playback (with navigation). Searching for word

Bug#535919: doxia: JAVA_HOME in debian/rules does not correspond to default-jdk

2009-07-05 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: doxia Version: 1.0-alpha-11-3 Severity: important *** Please type your report below this line *** Currently the JAVA_HOME specified in debian/rules does not correspond to default-jdk. It should be '/usr/lib/jvm/default-java' instead of '/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj'. While this may not cause

Bug#532640:

2009-07-05 Thread Onkar Shinde
I checked the source of velocity and it looks like it provides two ant tasks - TexenTask and AnakiaTask. These tasks have dependency on ant for functionality. Also anyone trying to use these tasks is expected to have ant installed. None of the remaining classes in velocity.jar depend on ant. So

Bug#506018: velocity: adds libraries to /usr/share/ant/lib

2009-07-06 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Ludovic Claudeludovic.cla...@laposte.net wrote: Hi Marcus, I propose to break the package velocity in 2 parts: velocity: contains velocity.jar and related stuff velocity-ant: contains the links to be installed in /usr/share/ant/lib/ for the velocity Ant tasks

Bug#536069: Package should have Architecture: powerpc

2009-07-07 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: openbios-ppc Version: 1.0-3 Severity: important The debian/rules file has logic that causes the build to fail when building on non-powerpc architecture. Please check the build failure in Ubuntu at [1]. Even though this is the case the architecture is specified as all in debian/control

Bug#506018: velocity: adds libraries to /usr/share/ant/lib

2009-07-07 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Ludovic Claudeludovic.cla...@laposte.net wrote: Onkar, I don't want to split the velocity jar in 2 parts, only the packaging. In the current packaging, installing velocity means that some links to jars are installed under /usr/share/ant/lib, which is not

Bug#506018: velocity: adds libraries to /usr/share/ant/lib

2009-07-07 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Ludovic Claudeludovic.cla...@laposte.net wrote: So the resolution of this bug implies 2 things: Ant - add support for user libraries in /usr/local/lib/ant I am not sure I agree with this one. But I have nothing against it. Velocity: - remove all links under

Bug#536069: Package should have Architecture: powerpc

2009-07-10 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Aurelien Jarnoaurel...@aurel32.net wrote: This package should be installable on other architectures than only powerpc as this package is used by the QEMU emulator, so the Architecture: all is correct. Closing the bug. Can you please then remove the code from

Bug#577704: libsurefire-java: maven-surefire-plugin not detected by mvn-debian

2010-05-12 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org wrote: Hi Onkar, On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Onkar Shinde onkarshi...@ubuntu.com wrote: I think the problem here is that surefire plugin does not have any 'debian' version in maven repository (only 2.4.3 version). yes

Bug#581566: libaopalliance-java: Please add maven repo information

2010-05-13 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: libaopalliance-java Version: 20070526-2 Severity: wishlist I am working on packaging xwork which is a build dependency of struts2. xwork uses maven for building and needs aopalliance as build dependency. As of now this package does not include any maven repo information hence it can

Bug#582508: mplayer: DVD menu support not available

2010-05-21 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: mplayer Version: 2:1.0~rc3+svn20100502-2 Severity: normal According to mplayer news [1] it supports new way to play DVDs - mplayer dvdnav://. As per my understanding this means display of DVD menu. But even though Debian's mplayer package is created from a recent snapshot this

Bug#582510: libspring-2.5-java: spring-aspects*.jar not available in any package

2010-05-21 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: libspring-2.5-java Version: 2.5.6.SEC01-9 Severity: normal I am working on packaging xwork2 which in turn is build-dep of struts2. xwork2 has build-dep 'spring-aspects' according to the pom.xml file in source package. It looks like this jar file should be built by libspring-2.5-java

Bug#582508: mplayer: DVD menu support not available

2010-05-21 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de wrote: snip Debian's mplayer is based on a snapshot about 14 months old. So this will most likely have to wait for mplayer rc4. /snip What does 'svn20100502' in version string signify then? It is this string that led me to

Bug#573123:

2010-03-09 Thread Onkar Shinde
snip I am all for free sw such as OpenJDK, only my netbank disagrees, so I do need at least an install of java that works in my iceweasel, and furthermore, preferably one that is acceptable to my netbank. /snip Did you try installing sun-java6-plugin from non-free repository? Onkar -- Passion

Bug#577704: libsurefire-java: maven-surefire-plugin not detected by mvn-debian

2010-04-13 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: libsurefire-java Version: 2.4.3-3 Severity: important I am working packaging struts2 from source. While doing a test build I faced problem where maven-surefire-plugin is not detected by mvn-debian. Following is the debug output. on...@ibook:~/Desktop/struts-2.1.8/src$ mvn-debian -e -f

Bug#577704: libsurefire-java: maven-surefire-plugin not detected by mvn-debian

2010-04-13 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Ludovic Claude ludovic.cla...@laposte.net wrote: Hi Onkar, Can you give me the versions of maven2 and maven-debian-helper? maven2 - 2.2.1-2 maven-debian-helper - 0.9 Also, have you tried building your package with the maven.mk CDBS scripts? mvn-debian is

Bug#577704: libsurefire-java: maven-surefire-plugin not detected by mvn-debian

2010-04-14 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:24 AM, Ludovic Claude ludovic.cla...@laposte.net wrote: Hi Onkar, First, try to get the latest versions of those 2 packages from Debian. There are also some new versions of related packages, I remember that there was maven-javadoc-plugin, maven-site-plugin, all

Bug#577783: /usr/bin/mh_make: mh_make should prompt for pom.xml location when file is not present in source root

2010-04-14 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: maven-debian-helper Version: 0.9 Severity: normal File: /usr/bin/mh_make I am working on packaging struts 2 and found out that the source does not contain the main pom.xml in source root directory. Instead it is in src directory. Trying to use mh_make with this source fails because

Bug#577785: /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/maven-vars.mk: Provide variable DEB_MAVEN_BUILDFILE to specify alternating pom.xml file

2010-04-14 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: maven-debian-helper Version: 0.9 Severity: wishlist File: /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/maven-vars.mk ant-vars.mk has a variable DEB_ANT_BUILDFILE which if set from debian/rules file is used as path to an alternate build.xml file. Similar variable (DEB_MAVEN_BUILDFILE) should be defined in

Bug#577704: libsurefire-java: maven-surefire-plugin not detected by mvn-debian

2010-04-14 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Onkar Shinde onkarshi...@ubuntu.com wrote: snip Second, to build the packaging for a Maven project, use mh_make on the sources, it will locate all the dependencies and create most of the debian files for you. I will try this way and report back. /snip

Bug#576978: libcommons-modeler-java: FTBFS: Test failures

2010-04-08 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org wrote: Hi, On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Daniel Schepler dschep...@gmail.com wrote:     [java] FAILURES!!!     [java] Tests run: 7,  Failures: 0,  Errors: 7 it looks like another gij f*ckup. Switching to default-jdk helps.

Bug#573581: newer upstream version available (4.8.1)

2010-03-12 Thread Onkar Shinde
There is already a junit4 package at version 4.8.1-1. Isn't that what you are looking for? Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#573581: newer upstream version available (4.8.1)

2010-03-12 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:06 PM, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote: On Friday 12 March 2010 17:33:11, Onkar Shinde wrote: There is already a junit4 package at version 4.8.1-1. Isn't that what you are looking for? Yes :) However, the package is at version 4.8.1, but it contains /usr

Bug#557720:

2009-12-20 Thread Onkar Shinde
notfound 557720 2.6.32-2 thanks The build does not fail on powerpc in 2.6.32-2. https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=linux-2.6 Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#562239: libgtksourceview2.0-0: Provide symbols files for better dependency calculation

2009-12-23 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: libgtksourceview2.0-0 Version: 2.8.1-1 Severity: wishlist Currently the shlib version is hard coded to 2.7.2. It will be great if the symbols files were added for better dependency calculation. This adds some overhead to maintenance so the bug is marked as wishlist. Guide for usage of

Bug#594270: libjcharts-java should depend on javaX-runtime

2010-08-25 Thread Onkar Shinde
A look at the source tells me that there is only one file using Sun specific APIs - src/org/jCharts/encoders/JPEGEncoder13.java. Also it looks like this file has been superseeded by src/org/jCharts/encoders/JPEGEncoder.java which uses java standard APIs. So it makes sense to not compile

Bug#598606: easymock fails to build from source due to missing build dependency on libhamcrest-java

2010-10-01 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:31 PM, James Page james.p...@canonical.com wrote: On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 10:49 -0430, Miguel Landaeta wrote: Hi Miguel I could not reproduce this in Debian. easymock B-D on junit4 and this depends on libhamcrest-java. You are completely correct; I overlooked this.

Bug#526092: fop wrapper script doesn't easily support hyphenation jar

2009-04-29 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Vincent Fourmond fourm...@gmail.com wrote:  Thanks for your report. I'll add that back as soon as I can (say, tomorrow ?). Where could I find this hypenation jar ? Here - http://sourceforge.net/projects/offo Following page also talks about similar method to

Bug#525946: hw-detect: snd-powermac not added to /etc/modules

2009-04-29 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote: Hello Onkar, On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Onkar Shinde onkarshi...@ubuntu.com wrote: Here is the sad news. It doesn't work. Check following outputs (all command run as root). iBook:/home/onkar# modprobe snd

Bug#505877: ITP: jakarta-jmeter -- Load testing and performance measurement application.

2009-03-19 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Jan Wagner w...@cyconet.org wrote: Hi Onkar, is there any process? :) On Saturday 27 December 2008, Onkar Shinde wrote: 1. I need sponsorship to the update of libcommons-jexl-java. The updated packaging lies in pkg-java svn. Maybe you should write about

Bug#508938: Source changed between two revisions

2008-12-16 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: libjboss-web-services-java Version: 0.0+svn5660+dak1-1 Severity: serious I am filing a bug (with minor changes) since I got no reply to my mail at [1]. I was recently checking if jbossas4 version from Debian unstable builds properly on Ubuntu so that I can drop changes made in last

Bug#505877: ITP: jakarta-jmeter -- Load testing and performance measurement application.

2008-12-27 Thread Onkar Shinde
Here is what I am stuck at. 1. I need sponsorship to the update of libcommons-jexl-java. The updated packaging lies in pkg-java svn. 2. I will need to package excalibur-logger [1] as it is essential dependency of jmeter. I plan to get everything done in Ubuntu first, as I have upload rights

Bug#508342: ant: Ant dependency

2008-12-10 Thread Onkar Shinde
Ant itself does not need java compiler to run. Following is the message I get. $ ant Unable to locate tools.jar. Expected to find it in /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/lib/tools.jar Buildfile: build.xml does not exist! Build failed You can see that while tools.jar is not present, ant tried to lookup

Bug#505877: ITP: jakarta-jmeter -- Load testing and performance measurement application.

2008-12-11 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Jan Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: are there already packages available for testing? Jan, I don't have any packages to test. I am still figuring out what all functionality of Jmeter can be compiled/built with existing libraries in Debian. I will have some

Bug#508485: fop: executable does not work; binary package dependency needs updating

2008-12-11 Thread Onkar Shinde
Why is this RC bug? The version you have specified is in experimental. testing has 1:0.94.dfsg-2. AFAIK, that version is not affected by this bug. Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#508485: fop: executable does not work; binary package dependency needs updating

2008-12-11 Thread Onkar Shinde
Vincent, Thanks for enlightenment. I am not very familiar with BTS. :-) Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#508509: Incorrect runtime dependencies?

2008-12-11 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: libhibernate3-java Version: 3.3.1.GA+dak1-2 I believe that libhibernate3-java has following incorrect dependencies. Please correct me if I am wrong. 1. java-gcj-compat-dev - should be removed. 2. java-gcj-compat | java2-runtime - should be changed to java-gcj-compat-headless |

Bug#510742:

2009-01-15 Thread Onkar Shinde
The problem lies in libswt3.2-gtk-jni. This package builds against old version of xulrunner (build dependency iceape-dev) and it does not have dependency xulrunner added. Hence it fails to lookup the symbol. The problem of wrong dependency is present with libswt-mozilla-gtk-3.4-jni as well, where

Bug#517035: tomcat6: Default HTTP connector port should not be 8080

2009-02-25 Thread Onkar Shinde
WWW caching service uses port 8080, so tomcat6 should use another port as a default. Which caching service are you talking about? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#522213: ITP: jcharts -- java based charts library

2009-04-01 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Onkar Shinde onkarshi...@ubuntu.com * Package name: jcharts Version : 0.7.5 Upstream Author : Nathaniel G. Auvil nathaniel_au...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : http://jcharts.sourceforge.net/ * License : jCharts License

Bug#522340: Missing symlinks

2009-04-02 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: batik Version: 1.7-2 While trying to port the jcharts package from Ubuntu to Debian, I got some compilation problems because of non-existent packages in batik. Turns out that batik package is missing symlinks '/usr/share/java/batik.jar', '/usr/share/java/batik-1.7.jar' which causing

Bug#588895: fop 1.0 is out

2010-07-13 Thread Onkar Shinde
The 1.0 release is not mentioned at [1]. So I assume it is not final yet. By the way, when you work on the package you may want to check/fix some of the existing bugs. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566484 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=575411

Bug#589269: xmlgraphics-commons: New upstream: 1.4

2010-07-16 Thread Onkar Shinde
Both batik and fop rely heaving on xmlgraphics-commons for the image processing. Let's make sure there are no regressions in these packages due to new version. It is possible that fop 1.0 needs xmlgraphics-commons 1.4. I haven't checked. Cheers, Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#589363: Fix FTBFS by not fail on error

2010-07-17 Thread Onkar Shinde
Some packages were removed from build dependencies because they were not built. It was case of circular build dependencies. The problem is still not solved. But I hope it will be solved in Maverick. Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#589231:

2010-07-22 Thread Onkar Shinde
The pmu_battery module was not built in kernels 2.32 in Debian. gnome-power-manager previously used some different methods for battery detection. So it didn't depend on presence of pmu_battery. IIRC, the problem started showing up since gnome-power-manager version 2.28. Now it can not detect

Bug#584386: cdk: FTBFS: Java errors

2010-06-04 Thread Onkar Shinde
Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Daniel Leidert daniel.leid...@wgdd.de wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 03.06.2010, 21:53 +0200 schrieb Torsten Werner: On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote: Justification: FTBFS on amd64 cdk builds perfectly on my amd64

  1   2   >