Bug#1024859: change in the extention importation with 3.11

2022-12-06 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
in order to debug this, I started gdb set a breakpoint in init_module_scitbx_linalg_ext then a catch throw and I end up with this backtrace Catchpoint 2 (exception thrown), 0x770a90a1 in __cxxabiv1::__cxa_throw (obj=0xb542e0, tinfo=0x772d8200 , dest=0x772c1290 ) at

Bug#1024859: change in the extention importation with 3.11

2022-12-06 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
There is a fix from the upstream around enum. https://github.com/boostorg/python/commit/a218babc8daee904a83f550fb66e5cb3f1cb3013 Fix enum_type_object type on Python 3.11 The enum_type_object type inherits from PyLong_Type which is not tracked by the GC. Instances doesn't have to be tracked

Bug#1013158: facet-analyser: vtk[6,7] removal

2022-11-21 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello Anton, I have just pushed a few dependencies in the -dev package in the salsa repo I did not updated the changelog. Cheers Fred

Bug#1013158: facet-analyser: vtk[6,7] removal

2022-11-01 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello Anton, I try to checkout paraview in order to add the -dev dependencies but I have this message $ git clone https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/paraview Clonage dans 'paraview'... remote: Enumerating objects: 175624, done. remote: Counting objects: 100% (78929/78929), done. remote:

Bug#1033600: emacs: File mode specification error: (file-missing Cannot open load file Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type pylint)

2023-03-28 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
If I remove the pylint package, no more error...

Bug#1041443: [Debian-pan-maintainers] Bug#1041443: pyfai_2023.5.0+dfsg1-3_all-buildd.changes REJECTED

2023-07-19 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
ok, it seems that I generated an orig.tag.gz with this (Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970). I can not remember which tool I used to generate this file. gbp import-orig --uscan or deb-new-upstream Nevertheless, why is it a serious bug ? thanks Frederic

Bug#1041443: [Debian-pan-maintainers] Bug#1041443: pyfai_2023.5.0+dfsg1-3_all-buildd.changes REJECTED

2023-07-19 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
> I am just the messenger here, if you disagree, please feel free to > contact ftpmasters or lintian maintainers. This was not a rant about this, I just wanted to understand what is going on :). > Your package has been built successfully on (some) buildds, but then the > binaries upload got

Bug#1041443: [Debian-pan-maintainers] Bug#1041443: Bug#1041443: pyfai_2023.5.0+dfsg1-3_all-buildd.changes REJECTED

2023-07-19 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
I just check this date is in the upstream tar file https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/54/84/ea12e176489b35c4610625ce56aa2a1d91ab235b0caa71846317bfd1192f/pyfai-2023.5.0.tar.gz

Bug#1041803: [Debian-pan-maintainers] Bug#1041803: hyperspy: FTBFS test_image fails

2023-08-01 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
the old and new hyperspy is not compatible with imagio > 0.28. I kindly opened a bug report about the situation at the upstream git repository.

Bug#1040159: epics-base: embedded yajl is vulnerable to CVE-2017-16516 and CVE-2022-24795

2023-07-26 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, I dicovered that upstream modifier yajl in order to support json5. I am wondering if their modification could not be integrated in our yajl. I fill a burg report about this idea here https://github.com/epics-base/epics-base/issues/405 Tell me what is your opinion about this. Cheers

Bug#1026864: dmrgpp: flaky autopkgtest on amd64: times out

2023-07-31 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
and a comment about this issue https://github.com/g1257/dmrgpp/issues/38#issuecomment-1655740289

Bug#1042740: [Debian-pan-maintainers] Bug#1042740: dmrgpp: Please package the new 6.04 version

2023-07-31 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
I filled a bug report about the new upstream. https://github.com/g1257/dmrgpp/issues/40 It is already fixed in the upstream git https://github.com/g1257/dmrgpp/commit/528501e4a5814d4cbb80e2cf16ea407f9e012ee6

Bug#1056792: bitshuffle: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x

2023-12-22 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
It seems to me that the FTBFS was not due to cython 3.x but related to this bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054716 now that this bug is solved, can you re run the build for bitshuffle ? Frederic

Bug#1058794: [Debian-pan-maintainers] [Help] Re: python-future: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.11 returned exit code 13

2024-01-04 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
ok for me - Le 4 Jan 24, à 13:19, Alexandre Detiste alexandre.deti...@gmail.com a écrit : > Le jeu. 4 janv. 2024 à 07:48, Andreas Tille a écrit : >> > @Vincent: this one package "gtextfsm" is yours >> > do you green light an upload ? >> >> If you ask me the package is team maintained and a

Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 - please upload fixes

2024-01-30 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
for dials it seems that the CI works with pandas 2.1 from experimental. https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/dials/unstable/amd64/41962612/#S4 - Le 30 Jan 24, à 9:05, Rebecca N. Palmer rebecca_pal...@zoho.com a écrit : > I intend to upload pandas 2.x to unstable soon. These packages have a >

Bug#1069144: ADvice about htis pocl issue on armel

2024-04-17 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello Andreas, I have another autopkgtest failure on armel with silx and pocl The content of check_atomic32 is def check_atomic32(device): try: ctx = pyopencl.Context(devices=[device]) except: return False, f"Unable to create context on {device}" else: queue

Bug#1063631: [Debian-pan-maintainers] Bug#1063631: closing 1063631

2024-04-17 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
I am working on it at the upstream level need a few more days. Cheers Fred

Bug#1060318: silx: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.12

2024-03-08 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
In order to reproduce the bug, install python3-silx 2.0.0+dfsg-1 python3-pytest-xvfb pocl-opencl-icd then $ pytest --pyargs silx.image.test.test_medianfilter -v === test session starts

Bug#1060318: Info received (silx: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.12)

2024-03-10 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
We already had the warning message [2024-03-10 14:26:18.189651850]POCL: in fn void appendToProgramBuildLog(cl_program, unsigned int, std::string&) at line 111: | ERROR | warning: /home/picca/.cache/pocl/kcache/tempfile_msXjLw.cl:861:14: AVX vector argument of type '__private float8'

Bug#1060318: Info received (silx: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.12)

2024-03-10 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Here a small script which trigger the errorfrom silx.image import medianfilter import numpy IMG = numpy.arange(1.0).reshape(100, 100) KERNEL = (1, 1) res = medianfilter.medfilt2d( image=IMG, kernel_size=KERNEL, engine="opencl", )

Bug#1060318: Info received (silx: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.12)

2024-03-10 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
It seems that here is an error here [2024-03-10 14:22:19.550588408]POCL: in fn int pocl_llvm_build_program(cl_program, unsigned int, cl_uint, _cl_program* const*, const char**, int) at line 420: | LLVM | all build options: -Dcl_khr_int64 -DPOCL_DEVICE_ADDRESS_BITS=64

Bug#1060318: Info received (silx: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.12)

2024-03-10 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Here a log with POCL_DEBUG=all picca@cush:/tmp$ python3 test.py [2024-03-10 14:22:19.462191847]POCL: in fn pocl_install_sigfpe_handler at line 265: | GENERAL | Installing SIGFPE handler... [2024-03-10 14:22:19.475550217]POCL: in fn POclCreateCommandQueue at line 103: | GENERAL |

Bug#1065724: epics-base: FTBFS on amd64: Tests failed

2024-03-12 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Here an analyse of the FTBFS On the amd64, I have two failures dureing the test Test Summary Report --- testPVAServer.t(Wstat: 0 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output Files=6, Tests=129, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.01 sys + 0.09 cusr 0.06 csys

Bug#1060318: Info received (Bug#1060318: Info received (Bug#1060318: Info received (silx: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.12)))

2024-03-11 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
With latest version (PAS OK) $ dpkg -l | grep pocl ii libpocl2-common5.0-2.1 all common files for the pocl library ii libpocl2t64:amd64 5.0-2.1

Bug#1060318: Info received (Bug#1060318: Info received (silx: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.12))

2024-03-11 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
On Debian12 it works out of the box $ POCL_DEBUG=1 python3 test.py [2024-03-11 10:05:31.837738936]POCL: in fn pocl_install_sigfpe_handler at line 229: | GENERAL | Installing SIGFPE handler... [2024-03-11 10:05:31.868890390]POCL: in fn POclCreateCommandQueue at line 98: | GENERAL |

Bug#1060318: Info received (Bug#1060318: Info received (silx: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.12))

2024-03-11 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Debian12 (OK) $ dpkg -l | grep pocl ii libpocl2:amd64 3.1-3+deb12u1 amd64Portable Computing Language library ii libpocl2-common 3.1-3+deb12u1 all

Bug#1060318: Info received (Bug#1060318: Info received (Bug#1060318: Info received (Bug#1060318: Info received (silx: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.12))))

2024-03-11 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
POCL_WORK_GROUP_METHOD=cbs python3 test.py make it works $ POCL_WORK_GROUP_METHOD=cbs python3 test.py [SubCFG] Form SubCFGs in bsort_all [SubCFG] Form SubCFGs in bsort_horizontal [SubCFG] Form SubCFGs in bsort_vertical [SubCFG] Form SubCFGs in bsort_book [SubCFG] Form SubCFGs in bsort_file

Bug#1060318: Info received (Bug#1060318: Info received (Bug#1060318: Info received (Bug#1060318: Info received (silx: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.12))))

2024-03-11 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
A workaround for now is to use this POCL_WORK_GROUP_METHOD=cbs Jerome is helping also here trying to understand the problem... https://github.com/silx-kit/silx/issues/4073

Bug#1060318: Could be related to LLVM rather than PoCL: works with LLVM-15

2024-03-12 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
bravo !!! This is team works. :)) Cheers Frederic

Bug#1060318: silx: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.12

2024-03-01 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
With the silx 2.0.0 version the failire is located in the OpenCL part the backtrace is this one when running the median filter # build the packag eintht echroot and enter into it once build dgit --gbp sbuild --finished-build-commands '%SBUILD_SHELL' run this command to obtain the backtrace...

Bug#1039087: removing embeded version of yajl

2024-05-29 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Here the upstream point of view about the CVE. https://github.com/epics-base/epics-base/issues/405 check with the security team, if their analyse is ok ? Fred

Bug#1039087: Info received (removing embeded version of yajl)

2024-05-28 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Here the diff between the epics version (debian patch unapplyed) and the current 2.1.0 version of yajl (debian patch unapplyed). not that simple...diff --git a/src/yajl.c b/src/yajl.c index d477893..fdad3f6 100644 --- a/src/yajl.c +++ b/src/yajl.c @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* - * Copyright (c) 2007-2014,

Bug#1039087: removing embeded version of yajl

2024-05-28 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
following a different path..., I added this in the rules file -export POSIX_CFLAGS+=$(CFLAGS) +export POSIX_CFLAGS+=$(CFLAGS) $(shell pkgconf --cflags yajl) export POSIX_CFLAGS+=$(CPPFLAGS) export POSIX_CPPFLAGS+=$(CPPFLAGS) -export POSIX_LDFLAGS+=$(LDFLAGS) +export POSIX_LDFLAGS+=$(LDFLAGS)

<    1   2   3   4