On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
> Richard A Nelson wrote:
>
> >
> > It doesn't sound like it broke your setup - just that you
> > can't take advantage of some of the features (like Makefile)
>
>
> After upgrading from 8.12 to 8.13 the mail s
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Tavernarakis Costas wrote:
> Two issues with local builds, found in both 8.13.1-20 and 8.13.2-1.
>
> 1. Patches in debian/patches/... do not get applied to the source,
>since the version number has changed.
I need to find a way to manage a local patch directory...
Any id
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, RayM wrote:
> ### Duplicate delivery suppression is broke for donb
> # sendmail -bv -v all | grep -i donb
> supervisors ... aliased to JerryA ,PaulC ,VanceB ,RichV ,VinceQ, Donb,
> JayE ,KeithO ,GaryW ,DaveH, GeneK
> planning... aliased to core.planning ,KyleR, RichU, Donb
> Do
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
Package: sendmail
Version: 8.13.5-3
Hi,
Hello again :)
when the debian sendmail package is removed but not purged (e.g. to
test other MTAs but keeping the config files to have the way back to
sendmail) the cronjob /etc/cron.d/sendmail keeps sending
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, David F. Skoll wrote:
Package: sendmail
Version: 8.13.4-3
Severity: important
If the clock on the computer is reset because of battery loss or some
other reason so that the m4 files have a date far in the future, bootup
hangs as the Sendmail startup script creates, recreate
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Dautzenberg, John wrote:
Host:/home/user1# apt-get -s install sendmail
[...]
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
sendmail: Depends: sendmail-bin (= 8.13.4-3) but it is not going to be
installed
Depends: rmail (= 8.13.4-3) but it is not going to be ins
Package: nsca
Version: 2.4-4
Severity: wishlist
It'd be nice to have the package support /etc/init.d/nsca, possibly
controlled with a setting sourced from /etc/default/nsca.
it is getting called often enough that I'd like to remove it from inetd.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/un
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
Hi,
Hello
rmail can't be installed with postfix, it depends on sendmail.
It should instead depend on mail-transport-agent
Actually, it is worse than that :(
$dpkg -s rmail
Depends: sendmail-bin | mail-transport-agent, libc6 (>= 2.3.5-1),
libld
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Alexander Zangerl wrote:
> the greet_pause feature works fine on "real" connections, that is
> whenever the sending side does elicit to talk to you.
Good :)
> in the case of a sender connecting to your smtp port, then closing
> the connection before a single byte of data has
Package: mimedefang
Version: 2.51-2
Severity: wishlist
> This is primarily a bug-fix release, but Dave O'Neill found something
> in the code that would cause a significant performance hit to all
> Perl regexp matching. You probably should upgrade if you run a busy
> mail server.
This update does
On Fri, 20 May 2005, José Miguel Garrido wrote:
> apt-get install sendmail
>
> Debian says:
[...snip...]
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> sendmail: Depends: sendmail-bin (= 8.13.4-1) but it is not going to
> be installed
> Depends: rmail (= 8.13.4-1) but it is no
Package: jabber-aim
Version: 20040131b-1
Severity: important
I get this when trying to login to the AIM transport (which I
successfully registered to) - I've verified (by looking in the spool
directory) that the userid/password are the same ones that work via
gaim!
Error Code #0016 While Logging
; urgency=high
* Depends netbase (>= 4.0.8) for submission closes: #295132
-- Richard A Nelson (Rick) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:02:00 -
That depend line is actually on sendmail-base:
Depends: m4, make, adduser, netbase (>= 4.0.8), ${perl:Depe
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I have 1.3.79 packages at svn://ia.mit.edu/openafs/branches/experimental
ack, sorry for taking so long to get back to you - I just got things up
and running with your 1.3.81-3 packages!
I had to remove all traces of kernel-preemption, or afs barfed.
Supp
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Sorry, for not replying sooner. Will answer more quickly in the
> future.
No problem, I understand how this happens (I often have so much going
on at one time that nothing gets done).
> > Do you have a define(`confDELIVERY_MODE', )dnl in
> > /etc/mail/s
Package: procmail
Version: 3.22-11
Severity: wishlist
smX (the next generation sendmail) requires LMTP support, which is not
enabled in Debian's procmail.
sendmail 8.13.4 (current) can also make use of LMTP support (which has
some benefits over the alternatives).
Therefore, I (and a few other se
Package: ftp-ssl
Severity: normal
ftp-ssl conflicts with ftp
heimdal-clients provides ftp
heimdal-clients uses alternatives to provide ftp (kftp) so if ftp-ssl
also used alternatives, the two could coexist just fine.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT polic
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: sendmail
> Version: 8.13.3-3
>
> I'm hosting 5 domains. After upgrading sendmail i find a strange problem:
> I send reguraly an email for 39 mailboxes in the same domain, and that domain
> is local.
> The email is accepted but none has rece
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Adi Kriegisch wrote:
> before updating there was a line for every user in the mail log; now it trys
> to deliver at once (as I found out because of the "m" option in
> LOCAL_MAILER_FLAGS?!) and eats some of the mails for unknown reason.
Aha... yes, that would do it - thanks,
Package: isoqlog
Version: 2.2-0.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
the recent isoqlog upgrade is uninstallable on my system. I get as far
as answering the debconf questions, then it enters an infinite loop.
I purged the package and tried a fresh install, with the same prob
Package: openafs
Severity: wishlist
Thu, 28 Apr 2005 23:49:59 -0400 (EDT)
OpenAFS 1.3.82 is now available for download from the openafs.org web
site.
This supposedly fixes the Forwarded Important Bug#303495
http://rt.cen
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.35
Severity: normal
I'm getting the following on two different Unstable boxen:
--
Subject: Cron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>if [ -x /usr/sbin/logcheck ]; then
nice -n10 /usr/sbin/logchec
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Johan Hovold wrote:
> After a dist-upgrade (testing) some week ago I noticed that mail
> delivered by fetchmail didn't arrive in my mailbox until after about
> 10 minutes. Prior, everything had been working perfectly.
That is the default queue run interval
> I have a setup w
severity 316094 normal
thanks,
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Benoit Panizzon wrote:
Package: sendmail
Version: 8.13.4-3
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
The messages (below) indicate no loss of data, just a delay in sending
Hi Cowboy
Hello !
I did desperately try to tr
Package: psad
Version: 1.4.2-1
Severity: important
I realy like the new psad, especially the new psad -S report:
Iptables auto-blocked IPs:
9.30.58.125 (7066 seconds remaining):
PSAD_BLOCK_INPUT(DROP)
PSAD_BLOCK_FORWARD(DROP)
After seeing a plethora of syslog e
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Dave Smith wrote:
> Package: sendmail
> Severity: important
>
> If you attempt to apt-get install sendmail on sarge then it fails on
> the rmail component. apt-get install postfix then apt-get install
> sendmail works.
Fails how? what messages ?
--
Rick Nelson
/*
* [...]
Package: slapd
Version: 2.2.23-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
1) use of ldapi:/// fails:
ldap_url_parse_ext(ldapi:///x-mod=0777)
daemon: bind(10) failed errno=2 (No such file or directory)
slap_open_listener: failed on ldapi:///x-mod=0777
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Come on...
well, since I did manage to get it going, I'll grant that the package
isn't unusable... but it was upon 1st install !
> > 1) use of ldapi:/// fails:
> > ldap_url_parse_ext(ldapi:///x
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Dave Smith wrote:
> If you attempt to apt-get install sendmail on sarge then it fails on
> the rmail component. apt-get install postfix then apt-get install
> sendmail works.
I'll wager that this is due to the depends and conflicts of rmail -
and isn't something that can be f
Package: openssh-server
Version: 1:4.1p1-5
Severity: important
Apparently, I'm the only, if not one of the few who was just bitten
after an upgrade of openssh-server from 4.1p1-4 to 4.1.p1-5.
After the upgrade, no users can login to the box, and there is no
logging of errors.
running sshd by han
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
The problem here is:
Jul 6 18:58:39 helium PAM-warn[28455]: function=[pam_sm_acct_mgmt] service=[sshd]
terminal=[ssh] user=[portfwd] ruser=[] rhost=[161.80.249.101]
openssh-server ships /etc/pam.d/ssh, but this above line indicates it is
looking f
Package: debpool
Version: 0.2.2
Severity: important
Tags: experimental
I get the following when trying to create a local package set for 3270:
2005-07-07 22:39:11 [GENERAL/DEBUG] Starting processing run
2005-07-07 22:39:11 [GENERAL/INFO] Processing changefile
'3270_3.3.4p4-1_i386.changes'
2005-0
Package: debpool
Version: 0.2.2
Severity: important
Tags: experimental
2005-07-07 22:56:02 [GENERAL/DEBUG] Starting processing run
2005-07-07 22:56:02 [GENERAL/INFO] Processing changefile
'sendmail_8.13.4-3_i386.changes'
2005-07-07 22:56:03 [REJECT/ERROR] Missing orig tarball
'sendmail_8.13.4.or
The error on the sendmail package is even more odd in that the package
was properly accepted into the debian distribution
--
Rick Nelson
RFC 882 put the dot in .com, not Sun Microsystems
-- Seen on Slashdot
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This bug still exists. Sendmail fails to install:
how did you manage to get only part of package tree ?
# apt-get install sendmailReading package
# lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be
Package: monit
Version: 1:4.4-4
Severity: normal
4.5 finally allows one to use netmask/cidr representations for the
allow statement ! And there are a plethora of other nice changes
as well.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, '
Package: openafs-modules-source
Version: 1.3.81-2
Severity: important
Kernel 2.6.12-rc2-mm1, PREEMPT
OpenAFS 1.3.81
Upon load of afs:
/usr/sbin/afsd -stat 300 -dcache 100 -daemons 2 -volumes 50 -dynroot -fakestat
-afsdb -nosettime
I immediately get this, and a hung /afs mountpoint
Unable to ha
Cross-referencing the Debian bug and OpenAFS ticket number:
Debian bug: #303495
OpenAFS Ticket: #18187
--
Rick Nelson
Win 95 is simplified for the user:
User: What does this configuration thing do?
You: It allows you to modify you settings, for networking,
hardware, protocols, ...
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Elad Tsur wrote:
> As a user who used x3270 I am very displeased about the disappearance of
> x3270 from Debian.
No more so than I, I'm sure.
> I read here about the events that caused this and I'm amazed.
Ditto.
> It seem to me the the situation can be cleared by sending
severity 335718 normal
thanks,
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, lulli wrote:
Because of hardcoding of "-t" option for procmail in the "sensible-mda"
binary it's impossible to run it without this option. This causes the
system mailqueue to fill up.
Without -t, mail will bounce on *any* error; bad .procmai
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Philip J. Clark wrote:
When doing a fresh install of sendmail, I need to always do
/etc/init.d/sendmail reload after a reboot to get the mailer to
work properly, otherwise mail appears to come from localhost.localdomain
and gets bounced.
So, what changes between the time
Package: wine
Version: 0.0.20050830-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Prior to this version, I was (un)happily running Lotus-Notes under wine.
Now, every start gets this:
X Error of failed request: BadAlloc (insufficient resources for operation)
Major opcode of failed r
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Rainer Zocholl wrote:
Hello
Hi
i don't know if this list is right.
If not pls. drop my a mail.
This is probably your best route
Situation:
No mail leaving box after an aptitude upgrade
# netstat -tulpen
Active Internet connections (only servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q
On Tue, 4 Oct 2005, Colin Cotter wrote:
My work doesn't give access to their smtp server from outside their domain,
so I decided to set up sendmail on my machine with my work email address so
I can send messages from home. However, any self-respecting mail server
bounces back my email because it
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Thanks for having applied the patch about GNU/kFreeBSD. However, I am
sorry to say it still fails to build from source, because I forgot a
part of the patch in the previous bug report. Please find it attached.
Hehe, no problem... one request, though
Package: wine
Version: 0.0.20050930-1
Severity: important
The last version failed wine startup, and this one gets to my
application (lotus notes) before crashing (badly)...
fixme:uniscribe:ScriptGetProperties 0x61be3aa8,0x61be3a7c
fixme:uniscribe:ScriptRecordDigitSubstitution 1024
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
After doing upgrade from woody to sarge sendmail stopped being
able to accept messages for local delivery:
$ telnet mail.tarunz.org 25
[...]
.
421 4.3.0 collect: Cannot write ./dfj8HJ2MR1021343 (bfcommit, uid=0,
gid
severity 328750 normal
merge 328750 296158
thanks,
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Nigel Horne wrote:
Package: sendmail
Version: 8.13.4-3
Severity: important
apt-get install sendmail gives this error:
*** ERROR: FEATURE() should be before MAILER()
*** MAILER(`local') must appear after FEATURE(`always_a
close 325581
thanks,
The makefile logic is a bit convoluted, but seems to work well in
practice.
It will not build maps that you create but don't reference in
sendmail.mc - why should it ?
However, when I touch sendmail.mc - ie to add a new map, and then
type `make`, it is smart enough to resc
severity 325581 normal
thanks,
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Derek Wueppelmann wrote:
I have been trying to figur eout how to get the sendmail build files to
generate a mailertable.db and access.db file. I have added the
appropriate FEATURE lines to my sendmail.mc file. I have then tried to
run the make
Paul, and awaiting some clarifications
from him on license issues before once again uploading new packages.
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 02:07:07 +0300
From: Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Richard A Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Fwd: licensing of the x327
close 320359
Thanks,
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Nirgal Vourg??re wrote:
Package: sendmail-base
Version: 8.13.4-3
Severity: important
Here is dselect output:
Setting up sendmail-base (8.13.4-3) ...
chage: can't open shadow password fileadduser: `/usr/bin/chage -M 9 smmta'
returned error code 1.
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006, Fourat Zouari wrote:
Package: sendmail-bin
Version: 8.13.8-3
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Eh? and how did it manage to break unrelated software ?!?!
I tryed to upgrade with apt-get dist-upgrade
An indication of from whence you started
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Fourat Zouari wrote:
> Package: sendmail-bin
> Version: 8.13.8-3
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
Eh? and how did it manage to break unrelated software ?!?!
I meant to say that other unrelated software breaks like subversion, trac,
hylaf
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Fourat Zouari wrote:
Ok, so you're still seenig the same start-stop-daemon error :(
what is the output of:
$ls -l `which start-stop-daemon`
here, I see
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 18504 Oct 13 06:41 /sbin/start-stop-daemon
dev:~# which start-stop-daemon
/usr/local/
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, Fourat Zouari wrote:
* Is these message are normal ??
Yes, unfortunately they are normal :(
They will go away with sendmail X, or sooner if I get the time to
complete a better sendmail.mc/cf parser (which all becomes a non-issue
with sendmail X, which is why I've not spen
tag 376113 wontfix
I reported the rmail problem with e-mail addresses (bug #8) starting
with '-' not being accepted earlier, including a patch, which still hasn't
made it into the distribution.
And wont, sorry - it was rejected upstream, and is so specialized as to
make its inclusion in Debi
On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Your package is failing to build. It doesn't seem to be trying to build
anything after this:
# which, if any of the dependant libraries each component needs)
for subdir in editmap libmilter mail.local mailstats makemap praliases rmail
sendmail smrsh vacat
Package: libsvn-mirror-perl
Version: 0.68-3
Severity: important
I created a new svk repo and tried to use it to mirror a local svn repos.
the svk mirror worked, but the subsequent svk sync failed with:
Oh no, no more exceptions! add_file() failed. at
/usr/share/perl5/SVN/Mirror/Ra.pm line 1219.
Package: nagios2-common
Version: 2.5-2
Severity: normal
After each update, my log fills with this message:
---
/usr/share/nagios2/plugins/eventhandlers/submit_check_result: line 36:
/usr/local/nagios/var/rw/nagios.cmd: No such
Package: hybserv
Version: 1.9.2-4
Severity: normal
November 11, 2006 -- Hybserv2 1.9.3 has been released!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'),
(500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testi
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Sergei Golovan wrote:
Change between 1.1.2-2 and 1.1.2-3 didn't touch LDAP support at all.
Well, that is odd then
Could you upgrade only ejabberd to 1.1.2-3 (and erlang-base and
erlang-nox to 1:11.b.2-1 as well)?
I didn't notice erlang being upgraded, but it is indeed
Hey, 'tis been a while since I've heard from you - I hope things
are going well in your neck of the woods !
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, John Goerzen wrote:
> Version: 8.13.2-1
>
> The op.txt file is 0-byte.
Odd... this is on a similiar system:
# dpkg -l sendmail-doc
ii sendmail-doc 8.13.2-1 A p
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 11:07:10PM -0800, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> > Hey, 'tis been a while since I've heard from you - I hope things
>
> Indeed -- I guess that's what happens when I switch to Postfix or Exim4
> :-)
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
Hello
> the upgrade vom debian 8.12 to 8.13 was breaking our
> sendmail configuration which was working well for years.
It doesn't sound like it broke your setup - just that you
can't take advantage of some of the features (like Makefile)
> Th
Package: openafs
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:57:58 -0500
[snip]
The UNIX client includes a number of updates, including many for Linux
2.6, and support for Solaris 10 running on Opteron processors.
The current versions in testing, and experime
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Martin wrote:
> The following patch (provided by Claus Assman) fixes it:
>
> --- deliver.c.orig Fri Mar 4 09:13:53 2005
> +++ sendmail-8.13.3/sendmail/deliver.c Mon Mar 7 10:53:42 2005
> @@ -5674,6 +5674,9 @@
> !(m->m_argv[0] != NULL && strcmp(m->m_argv[0],
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Thomas Aeby wrote:
> The update_mk script will overwrite /etc/mail/Makefile even if
> HANDS_OFF is set to Yes and thus will make a number of other files
> (notably /etc/mail/sendmail.cf) be replaced as well as a side effect
> when make is run in /etc/mail.
bummer :(
> This i
Package: hdparm
Version: 5.9-2
Severity: important
After recent changes, I noticed a performance loss - traceable to
the ROOTFS updates.
With these changes, everyone with more than one disk is required to
create a symlink - or only the boot devices gets altered.
It doesn't look difficult to bypa
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Zoran Dzelajlija wrote:
> Hi, apt-get upgrade or a sarge machine just failed like this:
>
> Preparing to replace libmilter0 8.13.2-1 (using
> .../libmilter0_8.13.3-6_i386.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement libmilter0 ...
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libmilte
Package: ircd-hybrid
Version: 1:7.2.2.dfsg.1-3.ssl1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
line 49 of contrib/m_spoof.c has a bum path:
#define SPOOF_FILE "etc/spoof.conf"
With that line, even creating an etc directory in /etc/ircd-hybrid, or
/var/log/ircd prevents /quote spoof ... from working - it issue
Package: gaim
Version: 1:2.0.0+beta5-11
Severity: normal
Access to Lotus Sametime (via meanwhile plugin) works fine on i386, but
the plugin seems to be completely missing on amd64 platform :(
Unfortunatly, I require the plugin for work...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers
Package: nagios-plugins-standard
Version: 1.4.5-2
Severity: normal
$/usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_jabber -v -H localhost
Using service JABBER
Port: 5222
flags: 0x27
CRITICAL - Cannot make SSL connection
$/usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_jabber -v -H localhost -p5223
Using service JABBER
Port: 5223
Package: nagios2
Version: 2.6-3
Severity: minor
My favourite annoyance fix: leading whitespace before comment in object
cfg files :)
The new nrpe (2.7.1) would also be nice - maybe now I can actually get
it working on AIX :)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing-propo
Package: nagios2
Version: 2.6-3
Severity: important
This apparently started with an update sometime after mid jan.
Notifications were working fine, and after bringing this system upto
date, I find that no notifications are getting sent.
I turned on notification logging - and nagios thinks it has
Package: hybserv
Version: 1.9.2-4
Severity: normal
I need to be able to telnet to hybserv to automate some tasks
P::3232:users
Here are two different scenarios where hybserv fails to handle telnet properly:
---
On one
Well, this gets more interesting...
Even a fresh install fails :(
I prepended /usr/bin/logger to the command and that says it should work.
I redirected output to /tmp/nagios.out and it shows errors like:
mail: /tmp/user/0/mail.: permission denied
Which points to libpam-tmpdir... The
After adding TMPDIR=/tmp (required for /usr/bin/mail), and running a
while, the notifications started trickling in - and there are no longer
any errors in /tmp/nagios.out (added >>/tmp/nagios.out 2>&1 to
host-notify-by-email).
So, this is now fair game for closure, but I'd like to recommend
a co
Package: psad
Version: 2.0.6-1
Severity: normal
The recent psad upgrade decided to start blocking my AIX boxes because
of their large ping size (even though the content/size was not
malicious).
No problem, I thought, I'll update /etc/psad/snort_rule_dl to include
SIDs 384(ping), and 499 (large pa
Package: websvn
Version: 1.61-22
Severity: important
Thank you for the updates fixing most of my authz issues !
There are two exosures left:
1) tarball generation ignores authz (no biggie for me, I disabled it)
2) 'Compare with Previous' ignores authz - and I can find no way to
Package: nagios2-common
Version: 2.5-1
Severity: important
In /usr/share/nagios2/plugins/eventhandlers/submit_check_result,
the path to the pipe is incorrect:
CommandFile="/usr/local/nagios/var/rw/nagios.cmd"
it should be
/var/lib/nagios2/rw/nagios.cmd
-- System Information:
Debia
Package: openafs-kpasswd
Version: 1.4.2~fc4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Every Debian box here, with a variety of kernels is now failing the
klog command with:
__ctype_tolower_loc()= 0xb7df06ac
strcpy(0xbfad6c64, "STLLP.SANJOSE.IBM.COM")
xt = open(fname, 'rb').read()
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'/usr/lib/templates/roots.ezt'
-
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, David Mart?nez Moreno wrote:
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:09:17 +0200
From: "David
Package: trac
Version: 0.10-1
Severity: normal
With libapache2-mod-python finally hitting the archive, trac is no
longer installable :(
Package: trac
Suggests: enscript, python-docutils, libapache2-mod-python
Conflicts: libapache2-mod-python2.3
Package: libapache2-mod-python
Replaces: libapache2
Indeed, I see this with the Cyrus Heimdal package set as well
$ valgrind ldapwhoami
==31776== Command: ldapwhoami
==31776==
SASL/GSSAPI authentication started
SASL username:
SASL SSF: 56
SASL data security layer installed.
==31776== Invalid write of size 1
==31776==at 0x815F549: ??? (in /usr/
$ ldapwhoami
SASL/GSSAPI authentication started
ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: Other (e.g., implementation specific) error (80)
additional info: SASL(-1): generic failure: GSSAPI Error: No
credentials were supplied, or the credentials were unavailable or inaccessible.
(unknown mech-code 0
$ ldapwhoami
SASL/GSSAPI authentication started
ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: Invalid credentials (49)
additional info: SASL(-13): authentication failure: GSSAPI Failure:
gss_accept_sec_context
$ ldapwhoami
SASL/GSSAPI authentication started
SASL username: cowboy@
SASL SSF: 56
SASL data se
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, Dan White wrote:
Do you have libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit or libsasl2-modules-gssapi-heimdal
installed, and what version?
ii libsasl2-modules-gssapi-heimdal 2.1.24~rc1.dfsg1+cvs2011-05-23-4
Is your slapd running on a separate host?
No, 'tis using ldapi://
If so, is i
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, Dan White wrote:
Yes, interestingly, this shows up for both failure modes:
Jun 11 15:37:02 sparks-ave ldapwhoami: canonuserfunc error -7
Jun 11 15:37:02 sparks-ave ldapwhoami: _sasl_plugin_load failed on
sasl_canonuser_init for plugin:
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.2-8
Severity: important
Code that compiles/links fine on an x86 platform, using PIE fails to
link on amd64 - looks like crt1.o wasn't built -fPIC on amd
$ cc -g -Wall -O2 -fstack-protector-all -z relro -z now -fPIE
-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-pie -Wl,--warn-shared-t
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-5
Severity: important
After getting Linux going on these Power4 (7029-6E3) boxes, I was just about
to roll out a dozen images (for starters) when I hit a big problem:
lspci -vvv
0001:02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA
G4
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Brice Goglin wrote:
It looks like another PCI domain related problem. The PCI code is being
reworked upstream, but it is not clear when it will be ready.
Sigh :( I'd be happy to test any WIP - is there an experimental version
of newer upstream ?
Did you ever get Xorg to
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Andrew Reid wrote:
Since the message deals with the peer certificate, you need
to verify not the local cacert certificate - but the LDAP server
certificate itself.
Please try this on both releases:
openssl s_client -connect :ldaps
Both systems do nearly the same
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Andrew Reid wrote:
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 258-1b+1
This certainly appears to be an OpenSSL issue, not libnss-ldap
Running "id " with a "debug " line added
to /etc/libnss-ldap.conf gives a message part way through
stating "TLS: peer certificate is expired", bu
tag 427549 moreinfo
thanks,
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
Package: sendmail-bin
Version: 8.14.1-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi
Hello
I get this with 8.14.1-4:
# /etc/init.d/sendmail start
Starting Mail Transport Agent (MTA): sendmail/etc/init
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
Could you try the following patch and see if that resolves the build
problem for you?
Indeed it does (once I remembered to tell m-a to not re-unpack the
tarball :) - I've not got my own kernel builds on ppc (just got the box
going).
Thanks for the quic
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
Not very helpful, can you provide a strace of the failing command ?
Strace is attached.
Eep, can you redo that with strace -f (to follow the child)?
the only help this gives is:
waitpid(-1, [{WIFSIGNALED(s) && WTERMSIG(s) == SIGSEGV}], WNOHANG) =
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
Eep, can you redo that with strace -f (to follow the child)?
Yes. I've attached the output.
Ah, much better...
3943 open("/usr/lib/libnss_db.so.2", O_RDONLY) = 4
3943 read(4,
"\177ELF\1\2\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\24\0\0\0\1\0\0\23"...,
512) =
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
changed. Now /etc/nsswitch.conf looks like this:
passwd: files
group: compat
shadow: files
Sorry, I should've said replace all compat by files
having compat in group: will still cause the db mixup
So I'll go back to wher
Can you send another strace -f ?
--
Rick Nelson
I really don't want much at all... Just a kind word, an
attractive woman, and UNLIMITED BANDWIDTH!!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 306 matches
Mail list logo
