hi keith,
make check from latest git passes on x86_64 running Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64; I
ran it half a dozen times, since we're dealing with a race condition (but you
never know obviously)
with the whole reorg of tests, I'm not even sure though which tests are still
in place (fwiw the one failing
Package: doc-rfc-std-proposed
Version: 20120225-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
Please fix this, re-assigning to dhelp if necessary.
From: Anacron
To: root
Subject: Anacron job 'cron.weekly'
Hi Robert,
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 09:56:44AM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote [edited]:
Thanks for the effort! Unfortunately reconf-inetd does not support yet tcpd(8)
(as mentioned in the reconf-inetd README file), and I see that leafnode is
meant to be configured with tcpd.
I've added
retitle 669317 verbose mode should list invalid fragments
severity 669317 minor
thanks
Hi again,
The files you install under /usr/share/reconf-inetd are not valid
xinetd.conf(5) fragments (instead they are in the inetd.conf format).
For an example fragment, see lines 35-45 at
Thanks for the report Jonathan. I'll check it out over the weekend.
--
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:34:46 +0200
From: Serafeim Zanikolas ser...@hellug.gr
To: beanstalk-t...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Beanstalkd 1.5 .deb package
Reply-To: beanstalk-t...@googlegroups.com
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 03:47:12PM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote:
Thanks. The logs from
Package: reconf-inetd
Version: 0.120226
Severity: normal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
block 660569 668140
thanks
Hi Robert,
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 09:33:16AM +0200, Robert Grimm wrote:
On Sun, 19 February 2012, you wrote:
I've developed a replacement of update-inetd that fixes these issues. The
replacement is called reconf-inetd and is documented in DEP9.
Please
tag ! moreinfo
thanks
Hi Robert,
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:35:21PM +0200, Robert Luberda wrote:
update-inetd hangs when it try to show error message with debconf,
but debconf was stopped before.
To reproduce:
1. install samba package and configure it to run as inetd
2. edit
Package: beanstalkd
Version: 1.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=beanstalkdarch=amd64ver=1.5-2stamp=1333294598
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=beanstalkdarch=kfreebsd-amd64ver=1.5-2stamp=100962
Hi guys,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:57:44PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
Alle venerdì 24 febbraio 2012, Pino Toscano ha scritto:
Alle venerdì 24 febbraio 2012, Serafeim Zanikolas ha scritto:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 08:11:17AM +0100, Konstantinos Poulios
wrote
[edited]:
On 02/24
Hi Holger,
The CC'ed munin bug report is fixed upstream and marked as 'pending
upload' by you (for a while now). Is it still in your todo?
thanks,
sez
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:22:49AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Package: bogofilter-sqlite
Version: 1.2.2+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Your package fails to build from source:
[..]
==
21 of 52 tests failed
(2 tests were not run)
==
what arch
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 08:11:17AM +0100, Konstantinos Poulios wrote [edited]:
On 02/24/2012 01:20 AM, Pino Toscano wrote:
[..]
The cairo rendering methods are in poppler-glib since many release (at
least 0.10, if not even earlier); since python-poppler 0.12 maps the
poppler-glib 0.12 API, I
Hi Pino!
Thanks for your proactivity on this matter. I'm adding in CC the upstream
author of pdfshuffler.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:51:39AM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
Package: pdfshuffler
Version: 0.5.1-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm (slowly) preparing to update Poppler to 0.18.0 in
Source: linux-ftpd-ssl
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
As you might know, update-inetd has issues that cause cross-package bugs, eg.
#168847. linux-ftpd-ssl relies on update-inetd and has been hit before by such
bugs.
I've developed a replacement of update-inetd that fixes these issues. The
replacement
Package: leafnode
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
As you might know, update-inetd has issues that cause cross-package bugs, eg.
#168847. leafnode relies on update-inetd and has been hit before by such
bugs.
I've developed a replacement of update-inetd that fixes these issues. The
replacement is called
As you might know, update-inetd has issues that cause cross-package bugs, eg.
#168847. leafnode relies on update-inetd and has been hit before by such
bugs.
btw the leafnode-specific bug is #638791.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi,
reconf-inetd is the replacement of update-inetd, as per DEP9. Unlike past
proposals for replacing update-inetd, this one is actually implemented and
available in experimental.
This should be of interest for services that
- require separate inetd.conf entries for ipv4/ipv6 versions
Found in version automake1.10/1:1.10.1-3
Fixed in versions automake1.11/1:1.11.1-1, 1:1.10.3-1, 1:1.4-p6-13.1
I was wondering on this page:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=21;bug=570850
It looks like the mail from Serafeim Zanikolas was meant
* not for 1:1.10.3-1
noowner 645901
retitle RFP: lettuce -- a Behavior Driven Development tool for Python
merge 645901 587852
thanks
Hi,
I'm renaming the ITP of 645901 to an RFP since there's been no activity in a
long while, and removing the owner.
I'd be happy to see Soren Hansen so...@linux2go.dk or anyone else
Package: ftp.debian.org
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I the maintainer of libbeanstalkclient-ruby request its removal from the
archive. I don't have the time or the motivation to maintain it, and it's got
only 6 installations (according to popcon anyway) and no rdeps. It's only been
Package: ftp.debian.org
Version: 0.9.9.1-6
Severity: normal
Hi,
I the maintainer of indywiki (and past upstream co-maintainer) request its
removal from the archive.
It's quite broken with current versions of urllib, not maintained upstream,
and I don't have the time or motivation to fix it.
Hi again Philippe,
Thanks for clarifying. I'd be happy to apply a patch, but I'm uncertain
whether the issue warrants a stable-release update (which is probably what you
need), and I would rather focus on update-inetd's replacement than
prepare/test the patch myself.
cheers,
sez
--
To
hi martin,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 05:27:53PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote [edited]:
Please let me make use of the full screen estate and display e.g.
thumbnails in 3 or more columns — should be configurable.
what do you mean? the number of columns is adjusted dynamically depending on
current
Hi Dominic,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:08:09PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote [edited]:
Transition has now completed; let me know when this does get fixed,
though.
I've just uploaded update-inetd 4.41 with Colin's patch.
cheers,
sez
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Philippe,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:41:26PM +0100, Philippe Basinska wrote [edited]:
update-inetd should allow a non-interactive mode to avoid the use of
debconf.
[..]
I looked at update-inetd code source and, in my opinion, DebianNet.pm
should load debconf code only if needed (if --multi
Hi Thomas,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 02:52:40PM +0100, Thomas Koch wrote:
would you like to include your scripts in the signing-party package?
Currently
they don't have any license attached.
Thanks for bringing this up. It'd be nice to see the scripts included,
assuming the pkg maintainer is
Thanks for the patch Colin. I'll make sure to upload a new update-inetd
release within a few days.
cheers,
sez
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Jason,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:40:08PM -0700, Jason Self wrote [edited]:
Package: bogofilter
Version: 1.2.2-2
Bogofilter include some documenttation under a license that doesn't permit
modification or commercial use.
That's indeed the case. The problematic files are not shipped in
tag 638180 confirmed pending
thanks
Hi Jörg,
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 01:31:21PM +0200, Jörg Ludwig wrote [edited]:
# cat /proc/15037/stat
15037 (inetutils-inetd)
This check always fails as the daemon is called inetutils-inetd
instead of inetd.
That's indeed a bug of update-inetd, when not
hi holger,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 05:22:55PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
against which version? 1.4.5-3?
yes, 1.4.5-3.
munin-1.4.5/plugins/node.d/users.in:print graph_printf %3.0lf\n;
cheers,
sez
--
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams
--
To
Package: munin-node
Severity: normal
hi,
the users munin plugin in config mode runs:
print graph_printf %3.0lf\n;
which makes munin-update rather unhappy:
Aug 29 06:30:01 [11443] - Warning: Unknown option graph_printf in
domain;host:users.graph_printf.
the result being that
block 638791 by 24043
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 09:53:27PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote [edited]:
Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org (11/03/2011):
http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep9
What's the status? What needs to be done to keep the ball rolling?
reconf-inetd, the proposed
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:57:51PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote [edited]:
Supposedly you're trying to write on alioth.debian.org while you should
be trying to write on svn.debian.org (beware of catch-all entries in
~/.ssh/config and the like)?
nope, I'm using
Hi Joey,
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 05:51:44PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Package: update-inetd
Version: 4.39
Severity: normal
[..]
The two entries are needed to support both ipv4 and ipv6. So it's surprising
that update-inetd wants to disable them.
Unfortunately update-inetd is broken by design
Package: python-freshen
Version: 0.2-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi!
Thanks for packaging python-freshen =)
When a test fails with an exception (other than an assertion exception),
freshen does not give any useful hint, other than the generic message
ExceptionWrapper:
$ PYTHONPATH=.:..
tag 632762 + fixed-upstream pending
thanks
Hi Leo,
Thanks for your report. This is a known issue and already fixed-upstream.
https://github.com/kr/beanstalkd/issues/49
--
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: mailping
Version: 0.0.4-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
Please consider adopting the attached patch to avoid the classification of
mailping emails as junk when the email subject gets a prefix (eg. as is
commonly the case when an email goes through a mailing list).
This optional
Thanks for the update Didier! I'll check your advice next time I'll be around
that sort of printer :)
Cheers,
Serafeim
--
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
+0200, Serafeim Zanikolas a écrit :
- reproduce the problem
- and report back the printed output
Here's the output, then :
$ pdfshuffler
.15 n
00.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/pdfshuffler, line 417, in choose_export_pdf_name
self.export_to_file
Indeed this is the case, and the proposed patch fixes the issue.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Version 0.0.4-0.1 of mailping as shipped in stable does not use atof on line
67. The version in unstable (0.0.4-2) indeed uses atof to fix a bug, but
properly imports string so doesn't raise the error.
wget
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/m/mailping/mailping_0.0.4-2.diff.gz
-O
Thanks for the report Olivier.
The problem originates from pypdf, it seems. Would you please:
- temporarily add this print statement to
/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/pyPdf/pdf.py
print '.%s.' % line
write before line 754, which currently has:
offset, generation = line[:16].split( )
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 02:11:40AM +0300, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote
[edited]:
No idea what changed, but it builds now.
Presumably something in the toolchain. Thanks for the update anyhow :)
--
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams
--
To
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:22:33AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote [edited]:
bogofilter_1.2.2-3 of sh4 succeeded build package.
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/fetch.php?pkg=bogofilterarch=sh4ver=1.2.2-3stamp=1302483325file=logas=raw
The official architecture seem to have no problem
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:51:06AM +0200, Cleto Martin Angelina wrote:
[..]
That's fine, and thanks for the update.
--
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:57:12PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote [edited]:
Please port your package to libdb5.1 as soon as possible. In most cases
ACK -- will check it out over the weekend, cheers.
--
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams
--
To
Package: python-freshen
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Please include the examples shipped in the upsteram bundle, in the
python-freshen binary package.
Cheers,
Serafeim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi Bill,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 05:46:27PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote [edited]:
As far as I understand, this is a warning, not an anormal termination.
Yes, we could check the return value of open, but it this instance I
feel that the warning is legitimate.
Agreed, but the user that sees the
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:46:59PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
[..]
Well, I have already changed the warning to read:
popcon: file $dpkg_db/$pkg.list is missing\n
Fine by me, cheers.
--
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Uploaded. Thank you for your contribution to Debian ;)
--
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Nikolaus, I'm glad to see you're still alive ;)
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 08:34:09PM +0100, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 02:41:40AM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
If you feel like taking over the Debian side as well, I'll be happy to
provide sponsorship.
quite some
Package: foomatic-db
Version: 20110209-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
Below is printconf's recommendation for a usb HP Deskjet F4180 printer.
$ sudo printconf
Printer on usb:/dev/usb/lp0 was not automatically configurable by Debian.
Please submit the following
information to
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:18:33AM -0500, Eric Cooper wrote:
tags 24043 + ipv6
thanks
This ancient bug makes it impossible to add entries for the same
service for both tcp and tcp6. I've only tagged it, but perhaps the
severity should be raised too.
You're right Eric. This is one of the
Package: mpd
Version: 0.16.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: upgrade fails
Hi,
mpd's postinst script returns non-zero because of the error_file directive in
/etc/mpd.conf (which was deprecated in v0.16).
Starting Music Player Daemon: mpdunrecognized parameter in config file at
line
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:08:08PM +0100, Max Kellermann wrote:
What do you expect the script to do?
I don't mind the init script failing, but not when called from postinst (and
thus breaking an upgrade).
You are using a (now-)invalid configuration file which you did not
migrate during
Package: popularity-contest
Version: 1.49
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
popcon failed with the error below while I've been purging another package:
/etc/cron.daily/popularity-contest:
readline() on closed filehandle FILES at /usr/sbin/popularity-contest line 104.
I guess that would be
pgpDfVme8mOdz.pgp
Description: PGP message
Package: docbookwiki
Severity: important
Hi,
The postrm script of docbookwiki exposes a mysql password in ps output:
MYSQLPASS=`grep -m 1 password /etc/mysql/debian.cnf | awk '{print $3}'`
/etc/init.d/mysql status echo drop database if exists webnotes ; \
| mysql
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
It seems best not to release squeeze with docbookwiki. It's got 3 RC bugs
which are young and apparently easy to fix, but upon a closer look it becomes
clear that the package is not in good
tag 540249 +patch
thanks
Dear devref maintainers,
I've prepared a patch against current svn to elaborate on the process of
accepting back to the project old developers.
It's based on material from the DAM announcement that's mentioned in msg #5 of
this bug report. The patch is spell-checked and
Package: sec
Version: 2.5.3-1+nmu1
Severity: normal
Hi,
Removing sec does not stop its daemon. The prerm script should be calling
sec's init script with a stop argument (this can be easily taken care of with
dh_installinit).
Cheers,
Serafeim
ps. I'm setting the severity only to normal since
Hi Cleto,
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:03:43PM +0100, Cleto Martin Angelina wrote [edited]:
I am going to ask to upstream about this but I think OutContains condition
has never been implemented. Instead of this, you can use FileContains
condition. In fact, FileContains condition has the task
Package: atheist
Version: 0.20100717-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
OutContains is documented but not implemented.
$ dpkg -L atheist | xargs grep -l OutContains
/usr/share/doc/atheist/html/intro.html
/usr/share/doc/atheist/html/objects.inv
/usr/share/doc/atheist/html/genindex.html
Cheers,
Serafeim
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:48:30AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote [edited]:
I'll ponder this an get back with you on Monday (US time).
and? what about my earlier proposal of using debconf only if it happens to be
installed?
-S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
That's fine. I'm glad that my NMU is unnecessary; obviously, feel free to use
(parts of) it.
It would be good however to finalise the text ASAP so that we advertise it for
translations.
-S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 02:52:38PM +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
On 28.12.09 Serafeim Zanikolas (ser...@hellug.gr) wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/562832
On an up-to-date sid installation, info works fine without any switches but
always fails when invoked with -k:
$ info -k python
-zero pass number (Closes: #566072)
+ * build-dep on po-debconf, and depend on debconf
+ * Create create debian/po/{POTFILES.in,templates.pot}
+ * debian/rules: call debconf-updatepo in the clean target
+
+ -- Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:07:07 +0100
+
util-linux (2.17.2
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 04:19:23PM +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote [edited]:
[..]
I guess we should close the bug then, OK?
Fine by me.
-S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
number (Closes: #566072)
+ * build-dep on po-debconf, and depend on debconf
+ * Create debian/po/{POTFILES.in,templates.pot}
+ * debian/rules: call debconf-updatepo in the clean target, and
+dh_installdebconf in binary-indep
+
+ -- Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:07:07
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:48:30AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:41:37PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
Please consider the attached patch that displays a warning using debconf.
Note
that I've added the warning in the postinst script (as opposed to preinst
this really closes: #601957).
+
+ -- Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org Sun, 21 Nov 2010 21:50:39 +0100
+
common-lisp-controller (7.4+nmu1) unstable; urgency=high
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nurp
common-lisp-controller-7.4+nmu1//debian/common-lisp-controller.preinst
common-lisp-controller
-generated
+file, to avoid config file conflict (Closes: #601957). Setting urgency to
+high for RC bug.
+
+ -- Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org Mon, 08 Nov 2010 20:13:35 +0100
+
common-lisp-controller (7.4) unstable; urgency=low
* clc-lisp should run 'clbuild lisp'. (Closes: #593157
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Please unblock package common-lisp-controller
common-lisp-controller (7.4+nmu1) unstable; urgency=high
* Non-maintainer upload.
* lisp-config.lisp is shipped as a conffile from
Hi again,
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:31:29AM +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote [edited]:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 03:51, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Desmond,
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 11:14:07AM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote [edited]:
I think the ideal instead would be to keep
Hi Desmond,
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 11:14:07AM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote [edited]:
I think the ideal instead would be to keep lisp-confifg.lisp as a conffile,
but remove it in preinst when upgrading from versions prior to 7.0. Here's an
I've tested the patch. Do you want to make
tag 601957 - pending
tag 601957 patch
thanks
Hi Desmond,
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 03:22:17PM +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote [edited]:
Is it a reasonable patch for the conffile conflict? I think it will
delete the file even if user has modified it.
6.17 (lenny release) creates
/postinst so
+that it is not marked as a conffile, and remove it upon package purge
+(Closes: #601957). Setting high urgency for RC bug.
+
+ -- Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org Fri, 05 Nov 2010 22:27:19 +0100
+
common-lisp-controller (7.4) unstable; urgency=low
* clc-lisp should run
; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * debian/rules: make sure /var/{lib,log}/couchdb have permission set to 750
+(related to #600051).
+
+ -- Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:08:08 +0100
+
+couchdb (0.11.0-2.2) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload
2010-10-30 16:08:21.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+couchdb (0.11.0-2.2) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Apply permission settings during package build (as opposed to during
+package installation) (Closes: #600051). Setting high urgency for RC bug.
+
+ -- Serafeim
user and group (partial revert of previous upload).
+
+ -- Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:08:08 +0100
+
+couchdb (0.11.0-2.2) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Apply permission settings during package build (as opposed to during
+package installation
.
* debian/rules: make sure /var/{lib,log}/couchdb have permission set to 750
(related to #600051).
-- Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:08:08 +0100
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:40:55PM +0200, Tomasz Rybak wrote [edited]:
Should I tag somehow bugs related to pyopencl to let everybody
know that I have fixes waiting for decision?
Should it be patch or pending, knowing that release managers
have not taken decision yet?
It doesn't matter
tag 601629 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
What error do you get when you try to mount /home by hand?
-S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I see two approaches here. Run aptitude in simulation mode, parse the output,
and ask for user confirmation if any removals are required.
Alternatively, tweak aptitude to not install any packages that require
removals. I don't know or use aptitude but from the little I've looked into
the
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:52:39AM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
Hi,
I see two approaches here. Run aptitude in simulation mode, parse the output,
and ask for user confirmation if any removals are required.
Alternatively, tweak aptitude to not install any packages that require
removals
So as already discussed offline, the best would be to drop -y from the
aptitude install invocation. If there are unmet dependencies, aptitude would
prompt for a confirmation, in which case tasksel could just relay the question
to the user.
-S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
:08:21.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+couchdb (0.11.0-2.2) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Apply permission settings during package build (as opposed to during
+package installation) (Closes: #600051). Setting high urgency for RC bug.
+
+ -- Serafeim Zanikolas s
-10-30
17:53:19.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+pyopencl (0.92~beta+git20100709-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add missing copyright holder in debian/copyright (Closes: #599874).
+
+ -- Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:47:21 +0200
+
pyopencl
tag 599874 patch
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: sec
Version: 2.5.3-1+nmu1
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/sec
Hi,
Please consider the use of inotify in -tail model, to reduce overhead and
power consumption.
Cheers,
Serafeim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
s/model/mode/ :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
indeed this is not an issue anymore in a clean sid chroot
-S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Pardon me for being persistent. Have you missed the email below, or do you
find the argument unconvincing?
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:13:34PM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:56:49AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 02:26:58PM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi!
Please unblock package update-inetd/4.38. The only change is:
update-inetd (4.38) unstable; urgency=low
* debconf template translations:
- Update Danish (thanks, Joe Dalton;
notfixed 600489 1.2.1-1
severity 600489 serious
tag 600489 pending
thanks
So I've reproduced this, and it's also the case for the -sqlite
-tokcyocabinet binaries. Thanks for your insistence :)
-S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
found 600489 1.2.0-3
fixed 600489 1.2.1-1
thanks
Stepan,
First of all, thanks for the bug report.
The problem you report was introduced in 1.2.0-3 and fixed in 1.2.1-1. Lenny
has 1.1.7-1, so this issue has only affected testing for the time window
between the above two versions. (Your report
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:36:27PM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote [edited]:
And was that __NR_perf_event_open thing the one that I was having issues
on MIPS? Hmm, need to verify...
No idea where that was -- it's been built successfully for mips in Debian.
: #570662)
+
+ -- Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:07:37 +0200
+
powertop (1.13-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version
diff -urp powertop-1.13.orig//perf.c powertop-1.13/perf.c
--- powertop-1.13.orig//perf.c 2010-07-20 01:08:21.0 +0200
+++ powertop-1.13
101 - 200 of 382 matches
Mail list logo
