Bug#340349: RFA: openldap2.2 -- OpenLDAP server (slapd)

2005-11-29 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 02:15:11PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: I am very sorry but I'll have to give away maintainership of OpenLDAP as currently I can't devote the time which is needed to maintaining it. I know this is really late and I regret not doing this step earlier. I can't adopt

Bug#341837: swig1.3: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

2005-12-03 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 03:21:57PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: swig1.3 fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD because this architecture does not yet have java support, where swig1.3 tries to build the java support. Please find attached a patch to fix that. Could you please add it in your next

Bug#340349: RFA: openldap2.2 -- OpenLDAP server (slapd)

2005-12-05 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi *, On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 01:11:23PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: I'm willing to maintain this package, and sure this is a complex package and I really want to do that in team maintainence. Is there svn repository and or mailinglist for this package ? I see the SVN repository now,

Bug#342374: setduplexmode broken

2005-12-07 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Package: gs-esp Version: 8.15.1.dfsg.1-1 Severity: normal Hi Bas, Masayuki, FYI: The PostScript file you sent seems to be correct. gs-gpl has no problem showing the contents but gs-esp breaks. Further checking I found the attached minimal test case which should work on any PostScript

Bug#308234: upgrading from 2.1.23 failed because of not setting slapd/dump_database_destdir

2005-05-09 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Ferenc, On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:21:32AM +0200, Ferenc Engard wrote: While I have upgraded my system, slapd upgrade asked some questions, including directory to dump databases. The text said the default is /var/backups/slapd-VERSION. Reading that, I simply pushed enter. After that,

Bug#308234: upgrading from 2.1.23 failed because of not setting slapd/dump_database_destdir

2005-05-10 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Joey, On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:11:50PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: I really think this is a bug that needs to be dealt with from the debconf side of things. Torsten, if you want to add a workaround to slapd, that should be ok, but the real bug appears to be that the readline frontend is

Bug#308234: upgrading from 2.1.23 failed because of not setting slapd/dump_database_destdir

2005-05-13 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Joey, On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 01:14:25PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: There's nothing stopping you from including an example value in the template. Don't present it as the default value. I don't like this but I won't argue it. It does not matter that much, it's easy to remove the remark. By

Bug#308906: Thread stack overwritten on 64bit

2005-05-13 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Package: slapd Version: 2.2.23-5 Severity: serious - Forwarded message from Quanah Gibson-Mount [EMAIL PROTECTED] - X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Flags: Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 19:14:53 -0700 From: Quanah Gibson-Mount [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#308234: upgrading from 2.1.23 failed because of not setting slapd/dump_database_destdir

2005-05-13 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Ferenc, On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 11:26:44AM +0200, Ferenc Engard wrote: I suggest that the frontend should explicitly indicate if it cannot handle default values, although the there is one, e.g. like this: Default value: /var/backups/slapd-VERSION *** WARNING! You have to type the

Bug#308595: fixed.

2005-05-19 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 09:14:57AM +0200, Julien wrote: Bug fixed in 2.0.54-4 ... So it was a bug in apache2? Greetings Torsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#309897: Wrong documentation example in /etc/default/slapd

2005-05-20 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Norbert, On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 12:12:04PM +0200, Norbert Sendetzky wrote: The example in /etc/default/slapd for SLAPD_SERVICES doesn't work: # Example usage: # SLAPD_SERVICES=ldap://127.0.0.1:389/ ldaps:/// ldapi:/// Instead it should be: # SLAPD_SERVICES=-h ldap://127.0.0.1:389/

Bug#309764: python-gtk: Problem with CellRendererToggle

2005-05-20 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Frederic-Emmanuel, On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 01:57:40PM +0200, Frederic-Emmanuel PICCA wrote: I am trying to use the gtkTreeView with a column Renderer which is a CellRendererToggle. so I have created a TreeStore with my last column containing a boolean. So I assigne this column (7) to

Bug#347725: slapd: incorrect password generation in config scripts

2006-01-12 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 12:06:22PM +0100, Manuel Baena Garcia wrote: The password generated in config script is a invalid crypt passwd. Why don't use slappasswd? Because slappasswd is not installed at that time if dpkg-preconfigure is used... Maybe we should try to use it in case it is

Bug#294499: Bug fixed in SWIG-1.3.27

2005-11-06 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi William, On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 11:13:02PM +, William S Fulton wrote: SWIG-1.3.27 contains the swig-fix-for-threadsafe-ZTS.patch patch. Assumed fixed and closing corresponding swig bugtracker bug http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=653355group_id=1645atid=101645

Bug#333428: slapd.schema.conf?

2005-10-11 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Elrond, On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:32:13PM +0200, Elrond wrote: What about moving all the include /etc/ldap/schema/* into thwir own /etc/ldap/slapd.schema.conf? This would make it far easier for add-on packages (like gforge or Samba-TNG) to add their own schemas straight into the

Bug#335896: ddclient: wrong POTFILES.in

2005-10-26 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Thomas, On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 05:40:18PM +0200, Thomas Huriaux wrote: $ debconf-updatepo can't open ./../templates: No such file or directory at /usr/share/intltool-debian/intltool-extract line 204. /usr/bin/xgettext: error while opening ../templates.h for reading: No such file or

Bug#335979: ddclient: [INTL:fr] French debconf templates translation

2005-10-27 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Christian, On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 06:27:27AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: Please find attached the french debconf templates update, proofread by the debian-l10n-french mailing list contributors. Thanks for the patch, I applied it to my working copy. Greetings Torsten

Bug#260204: pending?

2005-10-31 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Joey, On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 04:03:01PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Since this security issue was marked as pending in January, more than a dozen uploads of the package have been made. Odd. Good point. Actually I was sure that this has been fixed for long. I just checked and the passwords

Bug#335924: slapd upgrade fails on etch (ssl library problem?)

2005-10-31 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 01:22:27PM -0800, Navdeep Parhar wrote: I had the very same problem with slapd; the cause appears to be a missing library symlink for libz.so. You can work around this problem by creating this symlink yourself or by installing zlib1g-dev (which sets up the link too).

Bug#340349: RFA: openldap2.2 -- OpenLDAP server (slapd)

2005-11-22 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hey Maintainers! I am very sorry but I'll have to give away maintainership of OpenLDAP as currently I can't devote the time which is needed to maintaining it. I know this is really late and I regret not doing this step earlier. The package description is: This

Bug#340349: RFA: openldap2.2 -- OpenLDAP server (slapd)

2005-11-23 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 02:13:15PM +0100, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote: I'm willing to maintain this package, and sure this is a complex package and I really want to do that in team maintainence. Is there svn repository and or mailinglist for this package ? Yes, see

Bug#232492: Announce of the upcoming NMU for the openldap2 package

2006-10-20 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Christian, On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 07:05:04PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: On 12 oct 2006 I sent a notice to the maintainer of the openldap2 Debian package, mentioning the status of at least one old po-debconf translation update in the BTS (bug #232492). I am sorry for not answering

Bug#390954: [Pkg-openldap-devel] Bug#390954: slapd is compiled withou SLAPI support

2006-10-22 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 03:33:24PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: Compiling OpenLDAP with SLAPI support means that ACL caching is disabled. However, I'll note that ACL caching is broken in 2.3 for some types of ACLs, and compiling with SLAPI support is the only way to make those ACL's

Bug#393907: [Pkg-openldap-devel] Bug#393907: slapadd: ad.c:163: slap_bv2ad: Assertion `*ad == ((void *)0)' failed

2006-10-22 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:04:25PM +0200, Frederik Himpe wrote: This last failure happend when reinstalling slapd without /var/lib/ldap. So /var/lib/ldap is created when installing slapd and contains default DB_CONFIG file. The ldif file which is being added, is the small ldif file generated

Bug#393404: closed by Matthijs Mohlmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: [Pkg-openldap-devel] Bug#393404: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's)

2006-10-22 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 01:54:55PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes: The current version in unstable is openldap 2.3.27 and those documents are removed from the upstream source already. Hi! I looked at 2.3.27, and it seems the following

Bug#390954: [Pkg-openldap-devel] Bug#390954: slapd is compiled withou SLAPI support

2006-10-12 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Neil, On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 10:12:47AM +1000, Neil Brown wrote: Compiling slapd with SLAPI support would make it a lot easier to develop, test, and use SLAPI plugins :-) That's for sure :) Do you know if it could impact stability of the packages? I do not really want to risk anything as

Bug#361846: [Pkg-openldap-devel] Bug#361846: non-free license for core.schema

2006-10-12 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi *, On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:29:51AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: If this file is a non-copyrightable interface definition, the bug here is the presence of a copyright notice and license statement where there should be none. ITS#4693 in the OpenLDAP ITS system. In the logs for

Bug#401284: ddclient reports ....

2006-12-02 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 05:27:11AM -0600, Mario Oyorzabal Salgado wrote: ddclient have mode to verbose and debuggin, but may be can have a new feature hability for create reports (logs) of succes updates to dns in for example: /var/log/ddclient.log Or send emails to root user for

Bug#401282: ddclient: Don't use the https secure update in sitelutions ...

2006-12-02 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Mario, On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 05:06:08AM -0600, Mario Oyorzabal Salgado wrote: Severity: important I think the severity is to high as this is merely a suggestion for an improvement. The important severity is intended for a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package, without

Bug#382096: swig1.3: FTBFS: /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make: No such file or directory

2006-08-09 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 10:46:38PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Your package is failing to build with the following error: dpkg-buildpackage: source version without epoch 1.3.29-1 /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean debian/rules:10: /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make: No such file or directory

Bug#382263: mdadm: Upgrade kills my RAID setup

2006-08-09 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Package: mdadm Version: 2.5.2-10 Severity: normal Hi Martin, I am running a LVM on RAID setup for some time now and never had any problems. Yesterday I upgraded mdadm and today my system would not boot anymore. After some research I found out that /dev/md0 and /dev/md1 magically

Bug#225597: How about this bug?

2008-10-13 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi OpenLDAP-Team, I am going through the left-over bugs of libldap2 (which was removed a while ago, being superseded by libldap-2.4-2). I think, this bug should be closed or tagged wontfix. Rationale: + From my impression, LDAP clients are most often used to connect to a single local server

Bug#253838: Security risk in libldap

2008-10-13 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Monday 13 October 2008 21:03:36 you wrote: From: Rafal Kupka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libldap2 reads from ~/.ldaprc and $PWD/ldaprc while running privileged programs Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:21:48 +0200 Package: libldap2 Version:

Bug#207531: Default protocol version in libldap libraries

2008-10-13 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi again, Somehow this was talked to death but no action taken. It seems still to apply in 2.4.11. Perhaps we should just change the default version and see what breaks (after lenny is out)? Greetings, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#359713: Might still apply to 2.4

2008-10-13 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Folks, I think this bug could still apply to OpenLDAP 2.4. I did not check the sources, but shouldn't it be possible to allow recursive locking to fix this? Greetings, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#500759: Parsing of --unpack-tarball contradicts man page

2008-10-01 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.10 Hi debootstrap-Team, When building a OpenVZ template using debootstrap, I stumbled across the handling of --unpack-tarball. According to the manual-page, the syntax is --unpack-tarball=foo.tgz However I get the following on my system: # debootstrap

Bug#370343: set some default values?

2008-01-13 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Patrick, I am not really maintaining OpenLDAP for a while now. I got a new job and relocated and did not spend much time on Debian lately. On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 01:53:19PM +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote: I'm one of the Debian-Edu Developers and we have since a long time a bug against

Bug#461214: building libldap2 also depends on 'g++' too

2008-01-17 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:09:23PM +, Alexander Clouter wrote: Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Got myself a new laptop and went about compiling libldap2 from scratch[1] and found the following error hitting me when compiling: === [EMAIL

Bug#452612: python-clearsilver: [PATCH] python2.4 module reused as python2.5 module

2007-11-23 Thread Torsten Landschoff
-clearsilver_0.10.4-1.1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement python-clearsilver ... Setting up python-clearsilver (0.10.4-1.1) ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ python2.5 -c 'import neo_cgi' [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Thanks for considering, Torsten Landschoff -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT

Bug#453166: [PATCH] Fix for FTBFS with new SWIG package

2007-11-28 Thread Torsten Landschoff
not include anything from SWIG apart from the external # runtime. So I think this patch should suffice. # # -- Torsten Landschoff Index: subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/libsvn_swig_ruby/swigutil_rb.c === --- subversion/bindings/swig/ruby

Bug#453166: Info received ([PATCH] Fix for FTBFS with new SWIG package)

2007-11-29 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Just a heads up, I noticed only after building that the test suite fails for the ruby bindings. python and perl are fine though. Somehow an svn_auth_baton is not passed correctly, I'll follow up with logs once I have more time. Greetings, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310036: apt-get upgrade failes at slapd

2005-05-21 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Ronny, On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:00:08AM +0200, Ronny Standtke wrote: I get the following error when upgrading: - # apt-get -u upgrade Setting up slapd (2.2.23-5) ... mkdir: cannot create directory `': No such file or directory Backing up

Bug#304735: How stable is BDB?

2005-05-21 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 04:58:13PM +1200, Martin Langhoff (CatalystIT) wrote: As recently as November 2004, I was seeing serious lockups and dataloss with BDB backends, due to upstream bugs in the BDB integration, and all our LDAP setups ended up using LDBM due to reliability concerns.

Bug#304735: How stable is BDB?

2005-05-22 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 10:15:19PM +1200, Martin Langhoff (CatalystIT) wrote: And, just to clarify, with the 2.1 series of slapd, DB_CONFIG tweaking reduced the chance of lockups, but didn't remove them at all. In fact, it was so trivial to get the whole thing locked up that at one point I

Bug#310287: Compiled with old headers

2005-05-22 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Package: ipsec-tools Version: 1:0.5.2-1 Severity: wishlist Hi Ganesan, I get the following error with my setkey.conf: line 14: Policy priority not compiled in at [ in prio 0 ipsec esp/transport//require ah/transport//require] While I was only testing and don't really need the

Bug#255276: slapd/slapcat hang in endless loops

2005-05-23 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:40:11AM +0800, Eugene Konev wrote: After experimenting with different kinds of slapd database corrution on 2.2.23 I've found out that this behavior is hapenning then db environment files (/var/lib/ldap/__db.00[1-5]) are missing or severely corrupted. ltracing slapd

Bug#310282: slapd: Extended filters (ou:dn:=value) stop working after upgrade to 2.2.23-5

2005-05-23 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Rafal, On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 10:16:38PM +0200, Rafal Kupka wrote: After upgrade from 2.1.30-3 to 2.2.23-5 filters like '((mailAlias=imago)(ou:dn:=Aliases))' stopped working. Problem persists even after rebuild directory from backup and recreating indexes. Sorry, but where is it

Bug#310422: slapd: Fails to run update-rc.d during installation

2005-05-23 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 03:32:08PM +0200, Finn-Arne Johansen wrote: Not sure what causes this, no sign of anything going wrong during postinst script. I'll try to debug this later on Fixed in subversion. Greetings Torsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#310282: slapd: Extended filters (ou:dn:=value) stop working after upgrade to 2.2.23-5

2005-05-23 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Stefan, On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 03:34:59PM -0400, Stefan Schmieta wrote: Until somebody can show me that they are officially supported I'll downgrade this to wishlist. I'm affected by this bug too. In the OpenLDAP ITS this is SoftwareBug/3406

Bug#255276: slapd/slapcat hang in endless loops

2005-05-26 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Steve, On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 05:02:42PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: The attached patch adds calling db4.2_recover to slapd.init on every slapd startup. Are there any objections to applying this patch for sarge? I'll apply it with some adaptions. Most prominently it should check for

Bug#310809: slapd fails on upgrade 2.1.30 - 2.2.25

2005-05-26 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 09:11:46AM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote: slapd fails on attempts to upgrade from 2.1.30 to 2.2.25. Looking at the ldif file in backup, 'slapadd' chokes on attribute entries of the form: userCertificate;binary:: The 2.1.30 database was created cleanly using

Bug#255276: slapd/slapcat hang in endless loops

2005-05-26 Thread Torsten Landschoff
the ximian-connector ntlm @@ -17,7 +21,7 @@ two versions of this library around is more trouble than it's worth, and can cause glorious segfaults down the line - -- + -- Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 23 May 2005 17:03:53 +0200 openldap2.2 (2.2.23-5) unstable; urgency=low

Bug#255276: slapd/slapcat hang in endless loops

2005-05-27 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 09:10:50AM +0800, Eugene Konev wrote: +# Find out slapd db directories +SLAPD_DBDIRS=`sed -ne 's/^directory[[:space:]]\+*\([^]\+\).*/\1/p' \ +$SLAPD_CONF ` + TL I'd rather gather this list at the time when it is needed. Apart from

Bug#255276: Patch to run database recovery on startup

2005-05-27 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Florian, On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 08:27:47AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: The patch is risky. After it's been applied, invoking /etc/init.d/slapd start while slapd is running can (and most probably will) result in data loss. Yep, that is creating headaches for me too :( db4.2_recover -e

Bug#310380: libldap2: Same problem; slightly different fix

2005-05-27 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi *, On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 10:25:39AM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote: I'm seeing this, too (it's not an isolated report), but my fix was (very) slightly different: sincerity-forever:/usr/lib# ln -s libldap.so.2.0.130 libldap.so.2 Well, with all this fuss about that symbolic link to

Bug#304478: Default destination?

2005-05-29 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 11:41:24PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just installed another package of slapd. In fact it was the first package installed after I followed your advice to use echo FSET slapd/dump_database_destdir seen false|debconf-communicate. So I was asked whether I wanted an

Bug#304735: LDBM and 2.2.x

2005-05-29 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Toni, On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 04:11:48PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: fwiw, I have 2.2.23 with ldbm backend running w/o a hitch on OpenBSD, but breaking down completely on Debian almost sarge. Interesting. Which OpenLDAP version are you using? Esp. I can browse the directory and find

Bug#309026: Located the possition of the hang.

2005-05-29 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Klaus, On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 05:38:44PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote: Nothing else todo, bad weather (~29°C, sunnshine) I did several more debugging of the cron binary. I am so sorry. :( I spend the day hacking on OpenLDAP as well. Now I located the call to glibc which hangs. There is a

Bug#311209: Default DB_CONFIG should be created

2005-05-30 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Petr, On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 10:30:34PM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote: There is one problem, that DB_CONFIG is put (should be put...) in /var/lib/ldap, not into backends which were switched from ldbm to bdb. Something based on get_database_list is needed, like slapcat slapadd loops

Bug#305559: Not sufficient

2005-05-30 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 01:48:19AM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote: This patch is not sufficient to get this working. The problem is that as of -7, libldap.a is now just a symlink of libldap_r.a. (see debian/move_files) So either libldap_r.a needs to have ntlm built in or the two libraries need to

Bug#311491: slapd stops functioning almost completely if a CPU consuming process runs at the same time

2005-06-01 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 12:16:05PM +0200, Ulrich Hermisson wrote: from www.openldap.org (compiled with --enable-crypt). Only when I compile with the configure option --with-threads=no, everything is ok, but the slurpd needs threads. With threads, also the test 17 performed by make test fails

Bug#311491: slapd stops functioning almost completely if a CPU consuming process runs at the same time

2005-06-02 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Ulrich, On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 07:10:08PM +0200, Ulrich Hermisson wrote: I would be very happy with either kind of solution. Since the package, in its current state, cannot be used by us and, as I presume, many other people, it would be a big improvement if the problem were solved

Bug#293479: libsane: Please add ID for HP LaserJet 3200m

2005-02-05 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Henrique, On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 05:49:52PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: Niklaus Giger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had to add the following to lines to /etc/hotplug/usb/libsane.usermap to support my laser print (which otherwise works fine!) # Hewlett-Packard LaserJet 3200m

Bug#294241: swig: Bad casts in return-by-value Python (fixed in upstream (1.3.23+))

2005-02-08 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Jeremy, On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 01:03:24PM -0500, Jeremy H. Brown wrote: (typically with a segfault.) More detail on this bug, including example code, is available here: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=1645atid=101645func=detailaid=899332 A patch that fixes it is here:

Bug#285038: swig: -help is on stderr

2005-02-09 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 04:25:53PM +, Sean Neakums wrote: foo 21 | less will redirect foo's stderr to stdout and thus allow less to page the result. Anyway he is right. -help is for getting the help therefore the usage message is not an error and does not belong to stderr. Greetings

Bug#263835: slapd: I'm working on the GnuTLS patch for OpenLDAP 2.2

2005-02-12 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Modestas, On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 02:26:10PM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote: You know that the OpenSSL compat layer has nearly identical issues to the OpenSSL lib itself? The old patch did not use it because of them. The only problems I'm aware of are licensing issues. Compat layer is

Bug#294499: swig1.3: ftbfs [sparc] too few arguments to function `zend_rsrc_list_get_rsrc_type'

2005-02-12 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 04:24:44PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: swig1.3 fails to build from source on sparc, duplicated on sparc pbuilder. gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../Source/Include -I/usr/include/php4 -I/usr/include/php4/main -I/usr/include/php4/Zend -I/usr/include/php4/TSRM

Bug#276947: [python] /usr/share/swig1.3/python/pymacros.swg:109: Error: Syntax error in input.

2005-02-12 Thread Torsten Landschoff
tag 276947 pending retitle 276947 [fixed in 1.3.24-1] syntax error thanks Hi Thomas, On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 07:50:38PM +0200, Thomas Claveirole wrote: $ cat swig_error.i %define do_include [...] $ swig -w305 -python swig_error.i /usr/share/swig1.3/python/pymacros.swg:109: Error: Syntax

Bug#263835: slapd: I'm working on the GnuTLS patch for OpenLDAP 2.2

2005-02-11 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Modestas, On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 12:57:31AM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote: I want to announce that I'm working on the GnuTLS patch for OpenLDAP 2.2. It is based on the current patch for OpenLDAP 2.1 and on the OpenSSL compatibility layer from the GnuTLS library. You know that the OpenSSL

Bug#295327: swig: lib symlink broken , missing dependency ?

2005-02-15 Thread Torsten Landschoff
severity 295327 minor tag 295327 pending retitle 295327 [fixed in 1.3.24] swig package has symlinks into nowhere thanks On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 04:55:57AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ldconfig -v gives me a few errors: ldconfig: Cannot stat /usr/lib/libswigguile.so: No such file or

Bug#295452: [PATCH] SWIG 1.3.4 support

2005-02-15 Thread Torsten Landschoff
with SWIG 1.3.24. + + -- Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:42:42 +0100 + subversion (1.1.3-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. (closes: #290610, #288344, #290381) diff -u subversion-1.1.3/debian/rules subversion-1.1.3/debian/rules --- subversion-1.1.3

Bug#295959: aspell-de broken in sid

2005-02-19 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Package: aspell-de Version: 0.50-2-2 Severity: important Hi Christoph, I wanted to use aspell today to check a german report I have written. But aspell-de was lost during some update it seems and I can't install it again: # apt-get install aspell-de ... The following packages have unmet

Bug#295959: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#295959: aspell-de broken in sid)

2005-02-19 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Christoph, On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 04:18:19AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Brian uploaded the new package tonight, it will hit Sid on the next dinstall run (i.e. today). Wow. Seems like I had a really bad timing! ;) Thanks Torsten signature.asc Description: Digital

Bug#295452: [PATCH] SWIG 1.3.24 support

2005-02-20 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi David, On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 12:01:57PM -0800, David Kimdon wrote: I submitted the patch to the alioth subversion repository, thanks for posting to the dev list. You can feel free to upload the 1.3.24 swig. I already uploaded... From what I understand the new swig will break the

Bug#298888: [Swig-dev] [PATCH] Python bindings bug showing with SWIG 1.3.24

2005-03-19 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Max, On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 03:28:57AM -, Max Bowsher wrote: I've committed this (but also moved the tinfo declaration down as well), and nominated it for 1.1.4. That's great, thanks! Greetings Torsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#300853: Handling of foo:: ==IA entries in LDIF?

2005-03-22 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Package: slapd Version: 2.2.23-0.pre6 Tags: experimental Severity: normal Zed reported that LDIF files with foo:: IA== do not load correctly. They should as that entry says that foo is not there. Somebody reproduce this, please! ;) signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#294499: Re php4 wrappers broken for thread-safe php

2005-03-23 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Steve, On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 12:47:28AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: It seems that because of this and several other bugs that are not easily resolvable in the sarge time frame, as well as pressure from upstream, we are going to be backing out PHP's ZTS support in the next day or so; at

Bug#301292: BDB config file

2005-03-24 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Package: slapd Version: 2.2.23-0.pre6 Severity: important We ought to create a BDB_CONFIG file to use at least a little cache memory. Like 1MB minimum and up to 10% of main memory. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#294362: libfox: New stable upstream version 1.4.1 available.

2005-03-08 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 01:41:55PM +0100, Andreas Neudecker wrote: You seem to have skipped upgrading to upstream version 1.2. Is this package still maintained actively? It is. It's just very low on my priority list. It would be very nice, if libfox could be upgraded to current upstream

Bug#298614: Upgrading from woody to 2.2.23-0.pre4 fails

2005-03-08 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Package: slapd Version: 2.2.23-0.pre4 Tags: experimental Severity: grave Upgrading from woody fails because of at least two problems: - The shell function move_old_database_directory_away is not found in postinst - An old slapd.conf is incorrect because attribute=... is used instead of

Bug#273620: libldap2: auth failure using ldap

2005-03-09 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Peter, On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:15:55PM +, Peter Bright wrote: I'm using libnss-ldap/libpam-ldap against a Windows 2003 Active Directory Domain Controller. With SSL disabled in /etc/{libnss-,pam_}ldap.conf, all works as expected; I can authenticate, enumerate users, etc.. With

Bug#292845: have to kill slapd manually when running as non-root user

2005-03-09 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Richard, On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 03:35:04PM +0100, richard lucassen wrote: Debian Sarge. When setting these parameters in /etc/default/slapd: SLAPD_USER=ldap SLAPD_GROUP=ldap the slapd daemon runs as user ldap and works fine, but you will have to kill slapd manually when running a:

Bug#272471: ldap-utils: ldapsearch -LLL output seems abnormally truncated

2005-03-09 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Olivier, On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 11:32:18AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: When dn: records in LDAP are over 79 characters, they get truncated in the LDIF output of ldapsearch. I doubt that. ldapsearch uses to fold long lines to at most 76 characters per line which is in line with the LDIF

Bug#260368: ldap-utils: [sparc] bus error

2005-03-09 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Stephane, On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 09:05:41AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 11:36:41PM +0200, Roland Bauerschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 2.1.23 is rather old release. This is the one in sarge... Now that 2.1.30 is in sarge, could you test it? I still

Bug#255993: failed when setup slapd

2005-03-09 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi, On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 03:15:35PM +0700, Mr. Chatchai Jantaraprim wrote: when I run apt-get install slapd on one of my machine using testing, I got this error message: Setting up slapd (2.1.23-1) ... Creating initial LDAP directory... slapadd: relocation error:

Bug#255276: slapd: Same here : slapcat hangs, and db4.2_verify too

2005-03-09 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Olivier, On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:49:17AM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote: slapcat is also stuck in an endless loop on sched_yield() And db4.2_verify gets stuck too. straceing db4.2_verify gives endless messages like : select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0, 25000}) = 0 (Timeout)

Bug#288943: slapd is stopping brutally on asynchronous requests

2005-03-09 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Julien, On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 02:40:45PM +0100, COMBES Julien - CETE Lyon/DI/ET/PAMELA wrote: On testing with slapd 2.1.30-3 (directory with 8 entries, with bdb or ldbm database), slapd is stopping brutally without nothing in logfiles when some asynchronous requests are sent. (I

Bug#298741: /etc/init.d/slapd start is not idempotent

2005-03-09 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Bill, On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:27:58PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: If I do '/etc/init.d/slapd start' twice I get an error message the second time. Thanks for the patch, makes sense. While I prefer the start operation to really start slapd and bark if it is already running the debian

Bug#273620: libldap2: auth failure using ldap

2005-03-10 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 11:29:58PM -, DrPizza wrote: If this means resolving whatever legal issues (by e.g. using gnutls instead of openssl) surely that's the price that has to be paid and the work that has to be done. Okay, so you are doing it? I already spend like 100 hours on this and

Bug#299100: move_old_database_away debconf interaction

2005-03-11 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Package: slapd Version: 2.2.23-0.pre5 Tags: experimental Severity: important Upgrading fails because old database files are not moved away even if the user elected to do so. This is because the move_old_database_away function uses db_get to find out the users preference but it is called in a

Bug#299446: RFH: vim -- Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor

2005-03-14 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Norbert, On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:35:39AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: I'm looking for someone who wants to co-maintain vim, since I realized that I'm currently unable to take care of the package alone. There are a lot of open bugs that should be fixed, and there's also the upcoming

Bug#299474: no .shlibs file is shipped with libfox1.2

2005-03-14 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Bastian, On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 12:10:45PM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: after installing libfox1.2 there was no libfox1.2.shlibs file in /var/lib/dpkg/info. This results in missing dependency information for applications using libfox1.2, so they must use a debian/shlibs.local file.

Bug#201799: slapd: TLS with GNUTLS broken

2005-03-16 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Philipp, Sorry for this really late reply, I forgot about the patch and my intention to answer. Also I don't like this kind of answers as I know how much work it is to build such a patch... On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 10:51:10AM +0100, Philipp Matthias Hahn wrote: Torsten Landschoff wrote

Bug#298888: looking for help with swig/subversion/trac problem

2005-03-17 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi David, On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 09:31:38PM -0800, David Kimdon wrote: There are two bugs filed against subversion that look related to the recent swig upgrade. I am unable to pursue these at this time but they look rather important. I am hoping someone could take up the torch and look

Bug#298888: looking for help with swig/subversion/trac problem

2005-03-17 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi again, On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:15:13AM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote: This looks to me like a problem with whatever is linked to apr_pool_destroy. Probably there is a callback to clean up the python relevant stuff which fails for some reason. No time to look into this further now

Bug#300148: HOWTO for translation updates

2005-03-17 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Package: developers-reference Severity: wishlist Version: 3.3.5 Hi there. The following message was written by Christian Perrier to debian-devel explaining how to update debconf templates if the translation remains valid (typos etc.) I think this should be added to the DR. - Forwarded

Bug#298888: [PATCH] Python bindings bug showing with SWIG 1.3.24

2005-03-17 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi there, There seems to be a problem with the swig wrappers of subversion which shows up in 1.3.24. Here is the information I gathered: On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 12:29:59PM -, Max Bowsher wrote: Torsten Landschoff wrote: [...] - Trac (a lightweight version resembling something like

Bug#300212: slappasswd manpage should go into ldap-utils utils package

2005-03-18 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:17:45PM +0100, Emmanuel Lacour wrote: slappasswd manpage is in slapd package. slappasswd command is in ldap-utils package... Fixed in subversion repository for 2.2.23. Thanks Torsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#302629: slapd: Unstable upgrade (2.1 - 2.2) failures

2005-04-01 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Richard, On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 04:24:53PM -0800, Richard A Nelson wrote: Package: slapd Version: 2.2.23-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Come on... 1) use of ldapi:/// fails: ldap_url_parse_ext(ldapi:///x-mod=0777) daemon: bind(10) failed

Bug#302629: slapd: Unstable upgrade (2.1 - 2.2) failures

2005-04-01 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 04:24:53PM -0800, Richard A Nelson wrote: 1) use of ldapi:/// fails: ldap_url_parse_ext(ldapi:///x-mod=0777) daemon: bind(10) failed errno=2 (No such file or directory) slap_open_listener: failed on ldapi:///x-mod=0777 Should be fixed in

  1   2   3   4   5   >