package should be removed inmediately from Debian
repositories!
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk.
http://supergrub.forjamari.linex.org/?section=donate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
as background.
That fits into Case A.
Not sure what causes this bug yet.
El 20/01/12 00:28, adrian15 escribió:
I have done more tests and this is what I have found:
Case A: When I get a black background:
==
/home/user/.config/pcmanfm/LXDE.conf has lxde_blue.jpg
the licenses
issue has been solved.
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
the minimal versions needed of qt stuff so that
razor-qt works? This url:
https://github.com/Razor-qt/razor-qt/wiki/Dependencies
lack the version numbers in my opinnion.
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http
hope that all of this helps you to kill the bug.
Thank you again!
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
packages and maybe try to search a mentor.
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
waiting for knowing which are the minimum requirements
(versions) for razor-qt dependencies.
Thank you very much.
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
in a month, who knows.
Not to say that anyone who wants to make the Debian package instead
of me is welcome ;).
Thank you Ferdinand again.
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate
).
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
diff --git a/manpages/en/live-boot.7 b/manpages/en/live-boot.7
index 6a46d9b..77ac29f 100644
--- a/manpages/en/live-boot.7
+++ b/manpages/en/live-boot.7
El 06/04/12 20:21, intrigeri escribió:
Hi,
adrian15 wrote (06 Apr 2012 17:23:45 GMT) :
I think I've finally managed to make the patch.
Thank you.
I've even improved the part about checking that the iso was mounted
that intrigeri pointed out at:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2011/09
El 07/04/12 09:22, intrigeri escribió:
Hi,
adrian15 wrote (06 Apr 2012 18:39:46 GMT) :
I've even improved the part about checking that the iso was mounted
that intrigeri pointed out at:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2011/09/msg00067.html
So you have replaced
grep -q /live/findiso
El 07/04/12 18:29, Daniel Baumann escribió:
On 04/07/2012 04:06 PM, adrian15 wrote:
I am supposing that mountpoint is an standard command that comes with
Debian standard packages and thus you don't have to edit any
build-depends variable on the package definition.
it would be a depends
El 07/04/12 20:36, intrigeri escribió:
Hi,
adrian15 wrote (07 Apr 2012 17:14:08 GMT) :
This is the alternate patch then.
I'm fine with the reasons Daniel provided against using mountpoint in
live-boot, but I still don't consider grep -q /live/findiso
/proc/mounts as a robust way to check
El 08/04/12 07:11, Daniel Baumann escribió:
On 04/08/2012 12:19 AM, adrian15 wrote:
I rewrote the patch according to intrigeri wishes and with some pieces
of advice from Daniel.
but now you did worsen it a bit compared to the last iteration :)
* use 'mkdir -p /live/findiso' instead
El 08/04/12 13:29, Daniel Baumann escribió:
On 04/08/2012 12:50 PM, adrian15 wrote:
I rewrote the patch with your pieces of advice implemented.
looks good to me, thanks for you patience with it.
intrigeri, ack for applying it?
This is another patch that would complement the first one
El 08/04/12 20:33, intrigeri escribió:
tags 656135 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Daniel Baumann wrote (08 Apr 2012 11:29:28 GMT) :
intrigeri, ack for applying it?
Applied in Git, with a few improvements as follow-up commits.
Thanks adrian15!
Cheers,
The changes seem fine to me.
Thank you
El 08/04/12 20:33, intrigeri escribió:
tags 656135 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Daniel Baumann wrote (08 Apr 2012 11:29:28 GMT) :
intrigeri, ack for applying it?
Applied in Git, with a few improvements as follow-up commits.
Thanks adrian15!
Cheers,
While trying to improve fromiso/isofrom
Package: live-boot
Version: 3.0~a26-1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
I am trying to improve fromiso boot parametre current code.
I attach a patch that:
a) Rewrites it to its code structure is as close as findiso one. This
implies that the /live/fromiso (previously called /isofrom)
It seems I made a mistake when submitting the patch.
I attach the correct patch which only patches what I had originally
described.
Sorry for that.
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org
El 09/04/12 09:46, intrigeri escribió:
Hi,
adrian15 wrote (08 Apr 2012 20:54:39 GMT) :
But according to current fromiso implementation it would seem that
you have to check exactly the same directory as the one
you're umounting.
I'm not very sure about this reasoning so please take my patch
that you can access the
iso contents and copy them to RAM.
Once the content is copied to the RAM the iso is unmounted so, as its
explained in a comment in the code, you can fsck the underlying device
(Which I suppose gets umounted later, haven't checked that).
adrian15
--
Support free
/image that do
not seem to be used (just rgreped for /live/image). I might open a new
bug for this but I'm not sure.
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
diff --git a/scripts/live b
removing it just
to be sure that we aren't breaking anything.
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
El 10/04/12 11:59, intrigeri escribió:
Hi,
adrian15 wrote (09 Apr 2012 18:43:54 GMT) :
I attach the splitted patches.
Thanks!
I've merged:
* fromiso_001_renaming.patch
* fromiso_002_use_live_fromiso.patch
* fromiso_004_fromiso_uses_is_mountpoint_function.patch *but*
I
Package: live-boot
Version: 3.0~a26-1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
Current findiso implementation should be improved.
What needs to be removed (and checked that it does not induces any
regression) is the part where:
/live/findiso is mount-moved to /root/live/findiso.
I'll try
El 15/04/12 12:00, intrigeri escribió:
Hi,
adrian15 wrote (15 Apr 2012 09:22:03 GMT) :
El 10/04/12 11:59, intrigeri escribió:
Shall we consider this action item (fromiso rewriting based on
findiso structure) as done, and close this bug?
If the fromiso option still works I think so too
Package: live-boot
Version: 3.0~b2-1
Severity: important
When building an Squeeze debian live cd inside an Squeeze system and
trying to use live-boot* packages from unstable seems to be broken.
When I boot I get:
Loading, please wait..., run-init: nuking initramfs contents: Directory
not
First of all I've managed to fix the problem on the fly inspired from
the related bug.
So you boot with break=init and I run:
mkdir -p live
mount -t tmpfs tmpfs /live
exit
and the system seems to boot ok.
El 09/09/12 19:14, Daniel Baumann escribió:
On 2012-09-09 18:55, adrian15 wrote
doesn't work on stable make
easier your work.
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
needed actually works or if it would need hacks on how Gnu/Linux
kernel reads devices bigger than its partition table suggested size.
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate
to make depend this bug on #724931 if that it makes sense (not
very experienced on BTS and Debian policies).
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
=deb15c765e2b34fe587c96ca590981a59a278922
Upstream documentation: http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Ifcpu64.c32
Thank you!
I attach a patch for Isolinux / Syslinux implementation for cpu detection.
Please advise how to improve the implementation so that it can be
accepted upstream.
Thank you.
adrian15
I attach a patch for CPU detection when Debian Live uses grub2 as its
bootloader.
Please advise how to improve it so that it gets included upstream.
Thank you.
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http
).
9) You should boot into your Debian Live without problems (thanks to
findiso boot parametre).
If you ever wanted to test from your grub2 installation instead from
Super Grub2 Disk check: http://www.supergrubdisk.org/wiki/Loopback.cfg
for an example.
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate
4 GB hard disk test
after dding the ~ 500 GB image would have been detected as a 500 GB size
only hard disk.
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Just in case it's easier for you to accept my patch you can also find it
in this git repo commit based on live-build git repo:
https://github.com/adrian15/live-build/commit/c6da5ff61bb46cb66b23fcb66daa83e23fc8a36b
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
I have these same patches available for live-build package on my
live-build git repo here:
Isolinux:
https://github.com/adrian15/live-build/commit/4419638ab9cdfb1bacd98593e31d7f700b15a2dc
Grub2 :
https://github.com/adrian15/live-build/commit/a06085381ba346b576064ee84b325de54a81e33d
Just
I know that:
git push --force
is kind of forbidden when working in public with other people.
As this is my kind of personal repo I did it.
So the replaced commit (which only fixes file permissions) is found at:
https://github.com/adrian15/live-build/commit
the binary_syslinux renaming the kernel
filenames or is it ok the way I'm doing it?
Thank you.
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ
filenames.
Just in case you want the detailed commits from debian-old-3.0 to
debian-next they can be found here:
https://github.com/adrian15/live-build/commit/b907d5ca4cfac5407e4231a202b5b84cfcf8c56c
https://github.com/adrian15/live-build/commit/5c7636f8848b3d1d058bb2ed7fd69e01ad05270d
https
El 15/08/14 a las 13:04, Daniel Baumann escribió:
On 08/15/2014 07:12 AM, adrian15 wrote:
I attach a patch for Isolinux / Syslinux implementation for cpu detection.
nice, thanks.
from a quick look, sounds good. will check, test, and apply next week.
As suggested (by another bug) I attach
.
As of this moment I have written patches for 11 of these issues, some of
which have already been posted separately. More to follow soon.
Thank you again for your hard work.
adrian15
[1]:
http://git.grml.org/?p=grml-live.git;a=blobdiff;f=templates/boot/grub/grub.cfg;h
El 17/01/15 a las 02:21, jnqnfe escribió:
On 15/01/2015 14:52, adrian15 wrote:
I just write down here that I will have to review your mentioned: #1,
#2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9 in my (#757883) (support for
loopback.cfg file) so that it matches your improvements and fixes.
No problem, I
El 22/12/14 a las 01:19, Michal Suchanek escribió:
Hello,
On 10 August 2014 at 18:31, Adrian Gibanel Lopez adrian15...@gmail.com wrote:
Source: live-config
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
If one has configured its Debian Live to have more than one architecture
kernel this is what I am
about this templates directory. Thank you very much. I
guess the difference is that the grub2 package has some template files
by default while the syslinux has not these templates by default so the
bootloaders directory needed to be used. But, well, I'm just wild guessing.
adrian15
--
Support
Package: grub-common
Version: 2.02~beta2-20
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* Summary
grub-common not being dependent on mtools package breaks the build of
EFI based
ISOs (thanks to grub-mkrescue) for those of us who did not have mtools
package
installed in first place.
* What led
-detect.patch and mountmedia.patch.
Please, be aware, that I'm not telling you your approach is incorrect.
It seems we are lacking the explanation or rationale on why you made
that decision in order to evaluate that change in a fair manner.
Thank you very much!
adrian15
--
Support free software
El 18/08/15 a las 19:28, Andreas Cadhalpun escribió:
Hi adrian15,
On 18.08.2015 10:47, adrian15 wrote:
Can you please explain why you are using: get_fstype () function which it's
based
on blkid instead of just using the old method of relying in auto function from
the kernel itself
Right. Grub does not need to be inside the iso.
Your example is right is the filename is loopback.cfg and not
looback.cfg which I think it's a typo.
El 14/08/15 a las 08:41, Daniel Baumann escribió:
Hi,
just to be sure: loopback.cfg support means that the iso doesn't
necessarily has to have
issue can be found at:
https://github.com/adrian15/chntpw/commit/684d32504e4875fcb647544cb83903b375f22505
Additional note: I already contacted upstream author but received no
answer for
about half a year, so I guess it's fine pushing this to Debian.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.
binary to do such task.
* What outcome did you expect instead?
To have a binary that allows me to unlock a windows user from the
command line.
The two patches that allows the new samunlock binary are:
https://github.com/adrian15/chntpw/commit/b24f36061493ae674dbbcf815e314c6c90103311
https
_USER}" ${SAM_FILE};
* What was the outcome of this action?
The windows user password was not changed.
* What outcome did you expect instead?
I expected the user password to be changed.
You can find the patch that solves this problem in upstream here:
https://github.com/adrian15/chn
olves this issue can be found at:
https://github.com/adrian15/chntpw/commit/dc1c6edf135d9d628ab4230605bd778efd7c5dba
Additional note: I already contacted upstream author but received no
answer for
about half a year, so I guess it's fine pushing this to Debian.
-- System Information:
Debian Releas
to fix this situation on:
https://github.com/adrian15/live-build/tree/efi_support_based_on_debian_cd_rebased
and
https://github.com/adrian15/live-build/commits/syslinux-efi-2016
.
(I will probably do another rebase in another branch in the future with
other of your suggestions and these fixes.)
2
to
your email program and reply from there) can be found at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731709#153
2) Repo / Branches:
* efi_support_based_on_debian_cd (
https://github.com/adrian15/live-build/tree/efi_support_based_on_debian_cd
) : Original dirty branch where I worked
with syslinux-efi.
The quick and dirty branch where I worked on both grub-efi and
syslinux-efi is here:
https://github.com/adrian15/live-build/tree/efi_support_based_on_debian_cd
That branch is handy to understand the changes between Raphael's
original patch and what I present here.
adrian15
translate syslinux configuration files into grub
configuration files.
Feedback is welcome!
P.S.: I am going to release soon: Rescatux 0.40b3 which will be based on
these commits so you will be able to see how it would perform the final
product.
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super
El 18/01/16 a las 07:31, Michal Suchanek escribió:
Hello,
thanks for working on this.
On 18 January 2016 at 05:24, adrian15 <adrian15...@gmail.com> wrote:
In my last message I forgot to CC many people who are involved in this bug
so I'm going to refer to my former message, CC some
I attach a patch based on your work (which I have not tested so feedback
is welcome).
You can find the specific modifications to your original commit/patch
(which I had to cherry-pick) on branch:
https://github.com/adrian15/live-build/tree/efi_support_based_on_debian_cd
Now I'm going
/adrian15/live-build/tree/efi_support_based_on_debian_cd_rebased
So that part is solved.
(I'll send a proper rebased set of patches in the future).
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
El 18/01/16 a las 13:38, Thomas Schmitt escribió:
Hi,
adrian15 wrote:
* What is it a secondary bootloader?
It's what happens when you request mkisofs that your bootloader to be
boot in second place or as a second partition. I don't know how it
actually works.
An ISO may contain several lures
have stated earlier (although I might have missed
something there) they would overwrite their /efi/boot/boot*efi files ?
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
s refering to USB stick then.
adrian15 wrote:
Grub-pc would be the one installed to be boot but syslinux files would be
there for Multi-USB tools to know how to understand the iso and put it into
an USB.
You mean the capability to boot the ISO via BIOS from USB stick ?
(Known with SYSLINUX as
was graphical oriented and that I
left out some cli tools from it. Some sysadmins might consider using
grml instead of Rescatux for cli purposes just for that.
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http
El 25/01/16 a las 16:12, Michal Suchanek escribió:
On 25 January 2016 at 03:05, adrian15 <adrian15...@gmail.com> wrote:
El 24/01/16 a las 16:51, Michal Suchanek escribió:
What you are describing here is what it's actually implemented in my patch
(Well, actually the first patch v
_bootloader files so
that we have some sort of Object-Oriented / Hook programming when
defining what goes into the mkisofs options.
If you check current: binary_iso file it just relies on existing
binary_bootloaders without having an agnostic bootloader approach.
Here it'
fs options.
If you check current: binary_iso file it just relies on existing
binary_bootloaders without having an agnostic bootloader approach.
Here it's what I'm talking about:
https://github.com/adrian15/live-build/blob/5eba3dff5a16a34c3c1eb5d54e3767339654e2d0/scripts/build/binary_iso#L111
ng variables we have so that we know
what's going on in l-b?
Thanks
Michal
Well, basically, my design rationale behind this is that with the
current way of doing things you need to update binary_iso file each time
a new bootloader is added.
With what I'm proposing you you wouldn't have to u
El 21/01/16 a las 12:57, Thomas Schmitt escribió:
adrian15 wrote:
Do you mean if you have:
xorriso bunch-of-options-1 -eltorito-alt-boot bunch-of-options-2
you could just re-arrange them as:
xorriso bunch-of-options-2 -eltorito-alt-boot bunch-of-options-1
and it would be fine?
From
ot;Main bootloader"
and
"Alternate bootloader".
Or maybe even better:
"Main eltorito entry"
and
"Alternate eltorito entry"
?
So that we can force a given bootloader to be used only as a "Main
eltorito entry" ?
What do you think about this idea?
ad
ed on live-build master
branch) here:
https://github.com/adrian15/live-build/tree/efi_support_based_on_debian_cd_rebased_4
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/dona
El 21/03/16 a las 22:19, Michal Suchanek escribió:
Hello,
On 21 March 2016 at 21:09, adrian15 <adrian15...@gmail.com> wrote:
The branch which include specifically the commits I attach here as patches
is:
https://github.com/rescatux/live-build/tree/efi_support_based_on_debian_cd_reb
Package: live-build
Version: 5.0~a11-1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I was trying to use @VERSION@ string in splash.svg.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
I used @VERSION@ string in splash.svg.
* What
hardware, in your
distro builds, even if you don't use UEFI does the ISO boot as always in
BIOS mode?) And give us feedback on it.
Thank you.
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
>F
El 21/03/16 a las 22:19, Michal Suchanek escribió:
Hello,
On 21 March 2016 at 21:09, adrian15 <adrian15...@gmail.com> wrote:
The branch which include specifically the commits I attach here as patches
is:
https://github.com/rescatux/live-build/tree/efi_support_based_on_debian_cd_reb
u
can check our tour "Installing Debian".
CSA. 6. Enjoy your Debian
As per your technical role we recommend you to discover the
different blends of Debian which can be applied to normal Debian
installation thanks to its metapackages.
CSA. 7. Become a Debianer!
and can be found here:
http://www.supergrubdisk.org/2016/07/31/rescatux-0-40-beta-7-released/ .
As always feedback is welcome.
El 22/03/16 a las 07:18, Michal Suchanek escribió:
On 21 March 2016 at 23:06, adrian15 <adrian15...@gmail.com> wrote:
El 21/03/16 a las 22:19, Michal Suchanek es
that time I'll try to request a proper pull / insertion into
Debian's live-build repo and probably into live-build package binaries.
adrian15
El 31/07/16 a las 10:12, Michal Suchanek escribió:
Hello,
On 31 July 2016 at 09:35, adrian15 <adrian15...@gmail.com> wrote:
This new update tries to imp
El 04/08/16 a las 14:51, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
Hi,
On Sun, 31 Jul 2016, adrian15 wrote:
Is there anyone else than can provide feedback on this patch / branch?
Either by:
* Installing live-build with this applied patch
* Building your iso and check if it boots in both BIOS and UEFI mode
El 04/08/16 a las 14:51, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
Hi,
On Sun, 31 Jul 2016, adrian15 wrote:
Is there anyone else than can provide feedback on this patch / branch?
Either by:
* Installing live-build with this applied patch
* Building your iso and check if it boots in both BIOS and UEFI mode
El 25/08/16 a las 15:36, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
Hello Adrian,
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, adrian15 wrote:
Kristian Klausen thinks is a good idea to wait for your tests.
So your feedback is welcome.
I just built a test Kali image with your patch applied. It works:
I can boot the live system
El 26/08/16 a las 13:34, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016, adrian15 wrote:
Well, it sucks compared to the default visual appearance of
isolinux/syslinux in live-build.
I know, but the purpose of my patch is to add UEFI support. Not to improve
visual appearance of grub2 so
El 26/08/16 a las 09:52, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, adrian15 wrote:
That's how the grub-pc menu (BIOS) shows currently in live-build.
Well, it sucks compared to the default visual appearance of
isolinux/syslinux in live-build.
I know, but the purpose of my patch
-build/tree/efi_support_based_on_debian_cd_rebased_10
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
>From 01a9df8ce325c5df9762f0db86128614b4d3476c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adrian Gibanel Lo
Package: live-build
Version: 1:20171207
Severity: normal
Control: tags -1 + patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I was trying to build a live cd that has both two kernels: 686 and amd64
and at the same time which would be any hybrid disk so that I can boot
in a BIOS-only
Control: tags -1 + patch
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
he current git head ( d33943ea7a71ba5d874eb20f47bb898da485c77d )
* Can also be found at:
** Repo: https://github.com/rescatux/live-build.git
** Branch: foreign-architecture-support-quicktest3
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super
Package: live-build
Version: 1:20171207
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* Introduction
Jessie had linux-amd64 package in its own i386 section.
Stretch has linux-amd64 package not in i386 section but in amd64 section
only.
When using live-build with Jessie you could use in an i386 Jessie
Package: live-build
Version: 1:20171207
Severity: normal
Control: tags -1 + patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I was trying to build a live cd that has both two kernels: 686 and amd64
and at the same time which would be any hybrid disk so that I can boot
in a BIOS-only
Package: live-build
Version: 1:20171207
Severity: normal
Control: tags -1 + patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I was trying to build a live cd that has both two kernels: 686 and amd64
and at the same time which would be any hybrid disk so that I can boot
in a BIOS-only
Control: tags -1 + patch
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
Control: tags -1 + patch
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
Control: tags -1 + patch
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
Control: tags -1 + patch
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
El 21/12/17 a las 14:11, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2017, adrian15 wrote:
>> Now using:
>>
>> --linux-flavours="amd64:amd64 686"
>>
>> in a i386 system does install amd64 kernel from amd64 architecture in a
>> transp
El 21/12/17 a las 14:32, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2017, adrian15 wrote:
>>* What led up to the situation?
>
> The reportbug templates are not always very appropriate when you
> just want to submit a patch... just go straight to the explanation
>
El 23/02/18 a las 17:43, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, adrian15 wrote:
>> 3) So I dropped that implementation of the patch and searched for
>> something more elegant. A patch that modified the least possible lines
>> of the live-build code
El 18/03/19 a las 00:39, adrian15 escribió:
> El 09/03/19 a las 18:06, Thomas Schmitt escribió:>> What I'm saying with
> all of this is that I'm going to propose a fix that
>>> involves not using any earmark (which involves too much work) but just
>>> sea
El 20/11/18 a las 14:19, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
Sorry for the delay in answering but I have been busy.
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2018, adrian15 wrote:
>> After testing this change the Grub menu which should have two kernel
>> entries has only one. It might be other of m
distributions discuss with each other and
another place where remaster tool developers discuss with each other.
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
