Bug#896878: Info received (Bug#896878: Failed to execute /init (error -2) Kernel panic)

2018-04-27 Thread Андрей Василишин
I don't know what helped out of this. # apt-get install --reinstall linux-image-4.9.0-6-amd64 linux-image-amd64 sysvinit-core # upgrade-from-grub-legacy But now kernel 4.9.82-1+deb9u3 loading normally

Bug#896878: Failed to execute /init (error -2) Kernel panic

2018-04-27 Thread Андрей Василишин
26.04.2018 3:39, Ian Jackson пишет: Control: tag -1 moreinfo Adam Borowski writes ("Bug#896878: Failed to execute /init (error -2) Kernel panic"): On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:56:09AM +0300, Андрей Василишин wrote: [ 2.4575631 Failed to execute /init (error -2) I think erro

Bug#896881: CPU: 8 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 4.9.0-0.bpo.6-amd64

2018-04-25 Thread Андрей Василишин
Which Debian release are you using? Debian 7 "wheezy" or 8 "jessie"? Ben. cat /etc/debian_version 7.11

Bug#896881: CPU: 8 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 4.9.0-0.bpo.6-amd64

2018-04-25 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.6-amd64 Version: 4.9.82-1+deb9u3~bpo8+1 Hello! After update linux-image from linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 3.2.96-2 to linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.6-amd64 4.9.82-1+deb9u3~bpo8+1 new kernel does not want boot. After installation linux-image-4.9.0-6-amd64

Bug#896878: Failed to execute /init (error -2) Kernel panic

2018-04-25 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: sysvinit-core Version: 2.88dsf-59.9 Hello! New linux-image-4.9.0-6-amd64 4.9.82-1+deb9u3 and old linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 3.2.96-2 does not want boot with sysvinit-core. After installation systemd-sysv 232-25+deb9u2 all working fine. [ 0.228833] DMAR-IR: Failed to copy IR

Bug#841238: acpidump: "turbostat" binary silently dropped?

2016-10-18 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: acpica-tools Version: 20140926-1 Hello! Iam sorry,but there are no turbostat binary in acpica-tools package

Bug#840184: df and du shows different size

2016-10-09 Thread Андрей Василишин
09.10.2016 17:52, Ben Hutchings пишет: Have you run fsck over these filesystems recently? Yes, last was a few days ago. If I run fsck over these filesystems, du and df show the same used space.

Bug#840184: df and du shows different size

2016-10-09 Thread Андрей Василишин
09.10.2016 17:04, Ben Hutchings пишет: Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sun, 2016-10-09 at 14:26 +0300, Андрей Василишин wrote: Package: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64 Version: 3.16.36-1+deb8u1 Hello! Usually df -h and du -hs shows the same used space. That's not generally true, due to metadata

Bug#840184: df and du shows different size

2016-10-09 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64 Version: 3.16.36-1+deb8u1 Hello! Usually df -h and du -hs shows the same used space. But now I have a problem. I am using two SSD for a cache. Script using df command, all time writes and deletes files. There are no such problem with wheezy kernels. df

Bug#837810: df and du shows different size

2016-10-09 Thread Андрей Василишин
16.09.2016 6:28, Bob Proulx пишет: Андрей Василишин wrote: Thanks for your reply. If you watched my first message, you can see difference between df and du used space 237G vs 24G. There are no open deleted files. If I unmount this filesystems and do fsck, du and df will show the same used

Bug#837810: df and du shows different size

2016-09-15 Thread Андрей Василишин
lsof | grep -i del | grep /megastorage shows nothing You ran it as root? Yes

Bug#837810: df and du shows different size

2016-09-15 Thread Андрей Василишин
The first thing that comes to mind is that something has a file open, which was later deleted. Such a deleted file will not show up in du because it can't be listed, but the blocks the file is using will still be reported by df. If you have the lsof command installed (apt-get install lsof) you

Bug#837810: df and du shows different size

2016-09-15 Thread Андрей Василишин
I don't see a problem in the above. That df and du displays different information is an FAQ. Does this reference help you? https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/coreutils-faq.html#df-and-du-report-different-information That FAQ doesn't consider hardlinks. I suppose it should be

Bug#837810: df and du shows different size

2016-09-14 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: coreutils Version: 8.23-4 Hello! Usually df -h and du -hs shows the same used space. But now I have a problem. I am using two SSD for a cache. Script all time writes and deletes files. df -H /dev/sdc1 237G 178G 47G 80% /megastorage1 /dev/sdb1

Bug#816421: poppler-utils 0.26.5-2 Unknown compression method in flate stream

2016-03-01 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: poppler-utils Version: 0.26.5-2 Hello! There are problem with files created with producer jsPDF 1.0.0-trunk # pdftotext 12-v.pdf 12-v2.txt Syntax Error (1007325): Unknown compression method in flate stream Syntax Error (1239637): Unknown compression method in flate stream Syntax Error

Bug#754233: kernel panic linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 3.2.60-1+deb7u1

2014-07-08 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 Version: 3.2.60-1+deb7u1 Hello! A few latest wheezy kernels falling after 2-3 minutes uptime. Message from syslogd@localhost at Jul 9 00:11:02 ... kernel:[ 252.195448] general protection fault: [#1] SMP Message from syslogd@localhost at Jul 9

Bug#747129: grub-pc-bin (2.00-22) no one module in /boot/grub after installation

2014-05-06 Thread Андрей Василишин
06.05.2014 0:33, Colin Watson пишет: On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 11:03:58PM +0300, Андрей Василишин wrote: Package: grub-pc-bin Version: 1.42.9-3 This version number doesn't make sense as a version of grub-pc-bin. Hello! After upgrading grub2 from wheezy to jessie i have no one module in /boot

Bug#747129: grub-pc-bin (2.00-22) no one module in /boot/grub after installation

2014-05-05 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: grub-pc-bin Version: 1.42.9-3 Hello! After upgrading grub2 from wheezy to jessie i have no one module in /boot/grub After system reboot I receive grub_rescue message # ls -la /boot/grub/ итого 2556 drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 12288 май 5 22:52 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root root4096 май 5

Bug#744953: fsck.ext4: Filesystem too large to use legacy bitmaps while trying to re-open

2014-04-17 Thread Андрей Василишин
17.04.2014 18:07, Theodore Ts'o пишет: On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 07:41:47PM +0300, Андрей Василишин wrote: Package: e2fsprogs Version: 1.42.9-3 fsck.ext4: Filesystem too large to use legacy bitmaps while trying to re-open storage3 Can you send me the output to these two commands

Bug#742609: warn_alloc_failed+0x11f/0x134 linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 3.2.54-2

2014-03-26 Thread Андрей Василишин
25.03.2014 19:20, Ben Hutchings пишет: Control: tag -1 moreinfo It's very hard to read this log due to word-wrapping. It looks like you've enabled jumbo frames with a network driver that doesn't support scatter/gather. This is bound to fail under memory pressure. (mlx4_en was changed to

Bug#728122: pgrep in procps (1:3.3.4-2) is broken

2013-10-30 Thread Андрей Василишин
30.10.2013 6:01, Craig Small пишет: tags 728122 moreinfo thankyou On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 06:34:36PM +0200, Андрей Василишин wrote: # pgrep -xd , nginx /usr/bin/pgrep: line 202: cd: /tmp/.mc/auto/procps-ng-3.3.4: No such file or directory gcc: error: pgrep.o: No such file or directory gcc

Bug#728122: pgrep in procps (1:3.3.4-2) is broken

2013-10-28 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: procps Version: 1:3.3.4-2 Hello! # pgrep -xd , nginx /usr/bin/pgrep: line 202: cd: /tmp/.mc/auto/procps-ng-3.3.4: No such file or directory gcc: error: pgrep.o: No such file or directory gcc: error: fileutils.o: No such file or directory gcc: error: ./proc/.libs/libprocps.so: No such

Bug#642003: (ATL1E): transmit queue 0 timed out

2013-03-30 Thread Андрей Василишин
31.03.2013 2:22, Ben Hutchings пишет: Are you still seeing this problem with the atl1e driver? Does booting with the kernel parameter 'pci=nomsi' avoid the problem? Ben. Hello! Sorry, Ben, after a few downs I do not use Atheros NICs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#690320: netxen_nic using only 1 interrupt

2012-10-12 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: firmware-netxen Version: 0.36 After upgrade firmware-netxen NIC using only 1 of 4 interrupts Network-adapter: Model: Hewlett-Packard Company NC522SFP Dual Port 10GbE Server Adapter # modinfo netxen_nic filename:

Bug#681710: kernel panic linux-image-3.2.0-3-amd64 3.2.21-3

2012-07-15 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-3-amd64 Version: 3.2.21-3 Jul 15 15:53:27 host-37 kernel: [ 85.049563] [ cut here ] Jul 15 15:53:27 host-37 kernel: [ 85.049572] WARNING: at /build/buildd-linux_3.2.21-3-amd64-l_qIBB/linux-3.2.21/kernel/time/timekeeping.c:863

Bug#642025: (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out

2012-06-20 Thread Андрей Василишин
19.06.2012 22:10, Jonathan Nieder пишет: Hi Andrei, Андрей Василишин wrote: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out Sorry for the long silence. Did this happen only once, or was it reproducible? If the latter, is it still reproducible? What kernel

Bug#644938: [PATCH] mv_sas: OCZ RevoDrive3/zDrive R4 support

2011-10-10 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.0.0-5 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch, experimental Please add patch for latest kernel. More info: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg54889.html

Bug#642003: (ATL1E): transmit queue 0 timed out

2011-09-18 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64 Version: 2.6.37-2 Sep 17 14:18:45 s13 kernel: [58204.816018] [ cut here ] Sep 17 14:18:45 s13 kernel: [58204.816031] WARNING: at

Bug#642025: (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out

2011-09-18 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64 Version: 3.0.0-2 Sep 18 19:47:12 localhost kernel: [949402.396510] r8169 :02:00.0: eth0: link up Sep 18 19:47:13 localhost kernel: [949403.402626] r8169 :02:00.0: eth0: link up Sep 18 19:47:14 localhost kernel: [949404.340850] r8169 :02:00.0:

Bug#637076: AllowOverwrite On doesn't work with UserOwner and GroupOwner directives

2011-08-08 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: proftpd-basic Version: 1.3.4rc2 Directive AllowOverwrite On doesn't work in such config: # cat /etc/proftpd/proftpd.conf Include /etc/proftpd/modules.conf Global AllowOverwrite on /Global UseIPv6 off UseReverseDNS off Port 0 SystemLog

Bug#636955: mount doesn't show aufs partition

2011-08-07 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-image-686-pae Version: 2.6.39-2-686-pae # cat /etc/fstab # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # Use 'blkid' to print the universally unique identifier for a # device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name devices # that works even if disks are

Bug#636955: mount doesn't show aufs partition

2011-08-07 Thread Андрей Василишин
07.08.2011 15:45, Ben Hutchings пишет: On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 15:18 +0300, Андрей Василишин wrote: [...] # ls /sys/fs/aufs/si_f7eb3586/ br0 br1 br2 br3 br4 br5 br6 br7 xi_path Aufs partion is mounted, but not shown by commads mount, df What command did you use to mount

Bug#636955: mount doesn't show aufs partition

2011-08-07 Thread Андрей Василишин
07.08.2011 16:21, Ben Hutchings пишет: On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 15:49 +0300, Андрей Василишин wrote: 07.08.2011 15:45, Ben Hutchings пишет: On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 15:18 +0300, Андрей Василишин wrote: [...] # ls /sys/fs/aufs/si_f7eb3586/ br0 br1 br2 br3 br4 br5 br6 br7 xi_path Aufs

Bug#632373: closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Re: Bug#632373: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010)

2011-07-02 Thread Андрей Василишин
I didn't load tpm module, it automatiacaly loaded by OS. I am waiting for union mounts to get rid of aufs. -- WBR, Andrey Vasilishin CDIG1-UANIC, CDIG1-RIPE -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#632373: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010

2011-07-01 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64 Version: 2.6.39-2 [19633.004002] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0010 [19633.004002] IP: [811a6550] rb_erase+0x139/0x270 [19633.004002] PGD 0 [19633.004002] Oops: [#1] SMP [19633.004002] last sysfs file:

Bug#631678: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 67s!

2011-06-25 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64 Version: 2.6.37-2 [92306.091Z95] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 67s! [nginx:6565] [92366.691381] Stack: [92366.891469] Call Trace: [92366.691466] Code: 84 6b f5 ff b9 8c 88 86 66 31 c6 f3 ab c3 89 f6 Of a3 94 f7 18 82

Bug#621370: Kernel panic linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64

2011-04-06 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64 Version: 2.6.37-2 [178205.956211] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 8800f4d3e138 [178205.956511] IP: [812a6fde] tcp_transmit_skb+0x2ed/0x74b [178205.956698] PGD 1604063 PUD 1fffc067 PMD 0 [178205.956862] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP

Bug#613175: nginx-full: aio support

2011-02-15 Thread Андрей Василишин
I added file aio support to nginx-extras in 0.8.54-4. The reason this is not in the default nginx (nginx-full) is because it's usually a bad idea to use. In the vast majority of cases, it will cause degradation in performance. Being enabled also alters behaviors such as epoll usage. To

Bug#573189: linux-image-2.6.33-2-686: aufs does not work in, 2.6.33

2011-02-15 Thread Андрей Василишин
Why can't you understand that: - squeeze is going to use 2.6.32 - experimental is experimental - aufs is a dirty hack and will keep on breaking Why is aufs a dirty hack? I am using it for merging many HDDs in a big storage. I tested mhddfs (http://svn.uvw.ru/mhddfs/trunk/README) and it very

Bug#573189: linux-image-2.6.33-2-686: aufs does not work in, 2.6.33

2011-02-15 Thread Андрей Василишин
15.02.2011 17:15, Ben Hutchings пишет: On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 17:09 +0200, Андрей Василишин wrote: Why can't you understand that: - squeeze is going to use 2.6.32 - experimental is experimental - aufs is a dirty hack and will keep on breaking Why is aufs a dirty hack? Because

Bug#613175: nginx-full: aio support

2011-02-13 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: nginx-full Severity: important Hi! I have problem with using aio directive: [emerg]: unknown directive aio in /etc/nginx/vhosts/.conf:37 configuration file /etc/nginx/nginx.conf test failed Problem solved by adding ./configure --with-file-aio And one question yet. Why

Bug#613175: nginx-full: aio support

2011-02-13 Thread Андрей Василишин
13.02.2011 16:19, Kartik Mistry пишет: severity 613175 wishlist thanks 2011/2/13 Андрей Василишинa.vasilis...@kpi.ua: Package: nginx-full Severity: important I have problem with using aio directive: [emerg]: unknown directive aio in /etc/nginx/vhosts/.conf:37 configuration file

Bug#613248: aufs: aufs Direct I/O support

2011-02-13 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-26 Severity: wishlist File: aufs Hi! Latest aufs have Direct I/O support which I need. Can you update aufs module for latest? # modinfo aufs filename: /lib/modules/2.6.32-5-amd64/kernel/fs/aufs/aufs.ko staging:Y version:

Bug#584591: kernel panic linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64 2.6.32-11

2010-06-04 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package:linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64 2.6.32-11 Hi! I have a kernel panic not a first time There are last messages: [268772.688416][8127сс43]? tcp_ack+0xl744/0xl952 [268772.688479][81281a9d]? __tcp_push_pend ing_fraries+0x22/0x53 [268772.688558]

Bug#582660: ProFTPD-Basic problem with limit

2010-05-22 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package:proftpd-basic 1.3.3-1 Hi! I have the problem with limit section I am using proftpd-basic 1.3.2e-4 and proftpd-basic 1.3.3-1 on other server. I am using an example from http://www.proftpd.org/docs/howto/Limit.html for First, a common configuration: an upload-only directory My config: