Hi Harri,
this is a good suggestion.
I'll have a look, when upgrading the package to the latest version.
Thanks,
Alex
> On 28. Aug 2020, at 11:26, Harri Kiiskinen wrote:
>
> Package: basex
> Version: 9.0.1+ds-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I would suggest that the jar
New package with fix is available:
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/basex/basex_9.0-1.dsc
Cheers,
Alex
This is expected behaviour.
It indicates a warning (not an error) that some functionality (that some user
may expect reading the documentation of basex) is not available because some
recommended/suggested is not installed.
What do you think, does it make sense to you?
That's is a good point!
I'm considering to refine the packaging in the future.
Currently we have a single package 'basex', that provides four commands 'basex,
basexgui, basexclient, basexserver'.
In one of the next packaging cycles, I like to change this to something like:
• a core
Package: libjts-java
Version: 1.11-1
Severity: wishlist
Package could use a newer upstream version.
http://sourceforge.net/p/jts-topo-suite/code/HEAD/tree/tags/Version_1.13/
Thx!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture:
Package: maven-debian-helper
Version: 1.6.5
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
mh_make checks if apt-file is configured.
For that purpose it searches for /usr/bin/mvnDebug using apt-file.
However, mvnDebug can never be found that way as it is nowadays available at
/usr/share/maven/bin/mvnDebug.
As
Package: maven-debian-helper
Version: 1.6.5
Severity: important
File: /usr/bin/mh_make
Oct 17, 2013 9:38:48 AM
org.debian.maven.packager.DependenciesSolver$ToResolve resolve
SEVERE: Cannot resolve dependencies in ./basex-api/pom.xml: Not a valid
package name: null
On 16.10.2013, at 23:06, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Tagsoup has returned:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/tagsoup.html
Emmanuel Bourg
Thumbs up ;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Please report such things upstream.
Did so:
https://github.com/BaseXdb/basex/issues/620
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 07.05.2012, at 13:13, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 08:45 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
The discrepancy in size makes this package uninstallable via apt.
# apt-cache show basex
Version: 7.2.1-1
Size: 2319378
# wget
On 20.04.2012, at 04:04, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
o Parse non well-formed HTML (needs libtagsoup-java installed):
Say good HTML is fine too.
$ cat bad.html
html
ul
liA
liB
/ul
/html
$ basex
Is added as feature request by upstream
https://github.com/BaseXdb/basex/issues/376
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
can please provide some more input what is needed to adress this issue?
A step-by-step description of what is necessary to do to reproduce the problem
would be nice.
If you also could specify the format of an apt error message that would be
great.
Thx,
Alex
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: python-llfuse
Version: 0.37.1-2
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Hi,
i have a problem when trying to run the example filesystem:
$ wget http://python-llfuse.googlecode.com/files/llfuse-0.37.1.tar.bz2
--2012-01-30 22:53:01--
On 26.11.2011, at 22:26, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
OK, maybe there should be two example files. One easy, one hard.
Right. With the next release I'll provide an additional example file and
update the man page accordingly.
Thanks,
Alex
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Reported it upstream:
https://github.com/BaseXdb/basex/issues/288
Thanks,
Alex
On 25.11.2011, at 03:36, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Package: basex
Version: 7.0.2-1
File: /usr/bin/basexgui
$ F=1ADE82BB5C96D594?prettyprint=true;
P=http://gdata.youtube.com/feeds/api/playlists/$F
$
Reported to upstream: https://github.com/BaseXdb/basex/issues/289
Thanks,
Alex
On 25.11.2011, at 02:57, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Package: basex
Version: 7.0.2-1
File: /usr/bin/basexgui
No matter if one selects text with the mouse, and even clicks 'select
all' and 'copy', there
On 25.11.2011, at 02:32, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Package: basex
Version: 7.0.2-1
All I know is it works for your provided simple example file, but not my real
life things.
$ cd /tmp; basex -c OPEN input; XQUERY /|head
html
!-- Header --
head id=0
titleXML/title
/head
!--
On 25.11.2011, at 02:13, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Package: basex
Version: 7.0.2-1
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/doc/basex/examples/input.xml
http://www.validome.org/ says /usr/share/doc/basex/examples/input.xml is
not valid... Same with Emacs' nXML mode.
Something about the
Should that be resolved by repackaging the upstream tarball?
Thanks,
Alex
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
i've reported the issue to upstream:
https://github.com/BaseXdb/basex/issues/240
Thanks,
Alex
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Mari,
On 12.07.2011, at 15:46, Phil Harvey wrote:
Welcome back!
I do appreciate this as well.
Thanks to all for contributing to open source,
Alex
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: libimage-exiftool-perl
Followup-For: Bug #604476
Since June 25, 2011 exiftool is available in version 8.60
Would really be cool to get the package updated.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Hi,
I updated my Debian package for BaseX to the new upstream version 6.6.1
BaseX is a native XML database written in Java without any further dependencies.
I have done packaging using the maven-helper tools.
In first place, I would appreciate any feedback on how I could improve the
package.
On 20/02/11 14:47, Alexander Holupirek wrote:
Hi,
i tried to package 'BaseX - An XML Database' [1],[2] for Debian and produced
a first set of package files that can be found on
http://www.inf.uni-konstanz.de/dbis/basex/debian/index.php
The maven-*-helper tools from Ludovic
Hi all,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package basex.
BaseX is a native XML database and XPath/XQuery processor written entirely in
Java.
Besides it supports the latest W3C Full Text and Update Recommendations.
BaseX can be operated from command line, in client/server mode, or using a GUI.
/debian/index.php
$ apt-cache show basex
Package: basex
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: database
Installed-Size: 2260
Maintainer: Alexander Holupirek alex at holupirek.de
Architecture: all
Version: 6.5-1
Depends: java-wrappers
Description: XML database and XPath/XQuery
: Alexander Holupirek a...@holupirek.de
Architecture: all
Version: 6.5.1-1
Depends: java-wrappers, default-jre | java6-runtime
Description: XML database and XPath/XQuery processor
BaseX is a very fast and light-weight, yet powerful XML database and
XPath/XQuery processor, including support
Hi Ludovic,
I encounter the same problem when trying to package basex.
Are you planning to commit your patch anytime soon?
Don't want to put you under pressure, just bump the issue ;-)
Thanks for your work,
Alex
In pom.xml:
This plugin is not useful for the build or its use is against
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexander Holupirek a...@holupirek.de
* Package name: basex
Version : 6.1
Upstream Author : Christian Gruen christian.gr...@gmail.com
* URL : http://www.basex.org/
* License : ISC / BSD
Programming Lang: Java
30 matches
Mail list logo
