Package: libclc-amdgcn
Version: 0.2.0+git20160907-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Tags: upstream patch
Hardware information:
- platform: Clover (Mesa)
- device: AMD OLAND (DRM 2.48.0 / 4.9.0-2-amd64, LLVM 3.9.1)
With the libclc version from testing nearly all OpenCL
Hello Sylvestre,
Installing clang and llvm-runtime packages on my Debian testing, here is
what I get :
$ cat hello.c
#include stdio.h
int main (void) {
printf (Hello, world!\n);
return 0;
}
$ clang -emit-llvm -c hello.c lli hello.o
lli: hello.o: unknown type in type table
Hi,
Doing the same as GCC is fine. Would you mind take a look at this package?
http://people.debian.org/~aloiret/squeeze/llvm/llvm-defaults_0.1.dsc
Thanks,
Arthur.
2011/2/13, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org:
Hello,
I'd like to reproduce the same behaviour as gcc here.
Any objections
Hi!
Thanks for your bug report. Would you mind re-check with clang from
testing or unstable? (Version 2.7-2 or later).
Thanks!
Arthur.
2010/6/9, Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org:
Package: clang
Version: 2.6-3
Severity: normal
Clangs behaviour differs depending on where NULL is
defined.
Hi!
Thanks for your test case. Could you please try again with
gcc-4.5/libgomp1 from experimental?
Thanks!
Arthur.
2009/8/21, Ole Laursen o...@yayart.com:
Hi!
Forgot to attach a test case. It's really simple. Install
python-vipscc and run the following (and also attached) Python script:
tag 551188 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi!
I can't reproduce your bug. Does it still occur, and if yes, have you
tried on an other machine?
Thanks!
Arthur.
2009/10/16, Delian Krustev krus...@krustev.net:
Package: libgomp1
Version: 4.4.1-4
Severity: normal
$ ulimit -a pre
$ convert
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
Please remove newlib-mingw32, not supported anymore.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
Please remove libnewlib-dev on hurd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386,
not supported anymore.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
2010/5/30, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org:
It *does* matter! When I have to open some META file by hand to see its
content, it's much more easier to know beforehand (and without looking
for it) where it is. For now, the situation is not uniform: most of the
people put the META file under
Package: release.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: oprof...@packages.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
oprofile is dynamically linked against binutils' libbfd, which doesn't
have a stable ABI and bumps soname quite often. From
/usr/lib/oprofile/libopagent.so.1.0.0:
tags 573368 + pending
thanks
Thanks for spotting this, will be fixed soon.
2010/3/10, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org:
Package: llvm-dev
Version: 2.6-6
Severity serious
| # llvm-config --cflags --ldflags --libs jit engine
| -I/usr/include -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS
Hi,
The real error is from gnatlib's s-taprop.adb:
/build/buildd-gcc-snapshot_20100310-1-kfreebsd-i386-c6zRmm/gcc-snapshot-20100310/build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/build/buildd-gcc-snapshot_20100310-1-kfreebsd-i386-c6zRmm/gcc-snapshot-20100310/build/./gcc/
-B/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/i486-kfreebsd-gnu/bin/
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Lost interest in maintaining this package. Up for adoption!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Lost interest in maintaining this package. Up for adoption!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Lost interest in maintaining this package. Up for adoption!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Version: 20090808
Severity: normal
Hi,
wine needs the 32-bit version of openal on amd64, can you please add it?
Thanks,
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Lost interest in maintaining this package. Up for adoption!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: buildd.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please add this entry to Packages-arch-specific for llvm:
%llvm: !ia64 !mips !mipsel
Thanks!
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: buildd.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please add this entry to Packages-arch-specific for newlib:
%newlib: i386 powerpc ppc64
Thanks!
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
2010/2/24, Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 07:29:19PM +0100, Arthur Loiret wrote:
Package: buildd.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please add this entry to Packages-arch-specific for newlib:
%newlib: i386 powerpc ppc64
You know that it's currently available on:
amd64 hurd
Triplet of m4-nofpu is sh4_nofpu-linux-gnu.
What should I set in src/gcc/multiarch.h?
Something like:
# if defined(__sh4-linux-gnu__)
{ m4, sh4-linux-gnu },
{ m4-nofpu, sh4_nofpu-linux-gnu },
# endif
And then, if it builds, can you paste the include paths and library
paths for both
The mapping is missing in gcc/multiarch.h (see
debian/patches/gcc-multiarch.inc). What is the corresponding GNU
triplet to m4-nofpu (it seems to be sh4-linux-gnu for m4)?
Arthur.
2010/1/5, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@nigauri.org:
reopen 546443
thanks
Hi,
This bug is not yet revised.
sh4
Hi,
Thanks for your bug report. Can you provide a minimal testcase, ie the
simplest fie possible for which the bug is triggered?
Thanks!
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Can you please re-check with llvm and llvm-gcc-4.2 from sid? Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
It was fixed in llvm-gcc-4.2 2.5-1 (which is a merge from llvm 2.5-1,
configured with --with-pic --enable-pic, see #518476).
2009/12/10, Václav Šmilauer eudo...@arcig.cz:
Arthur, could you please provide version where it was fixed or link to
the changelog? Thanks.
reassign 559721 ldc
retitle 559721 Needs porting on s390
severity 559721 wishlist
thanks
libtango has never been built on s390.
2009/12/6, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org:
Source: libtango
Version: 0.99.8+svn5259.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your
Indeed. I'll fix that on next upload.
2009/12/9, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 07:15:46PM +0100, Arthur Loiret wrote:
libtango has never been built on s390.
But ldc have. Built but not working is RC as well.
Bastian
--
No more blah, blah, blah
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
Please remove llvm-gcc-4.2 on armel, not supported anymore.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: llvm-snapshot
Severity: serious
llvm-snapshot is not intended to be ever released with a stable Debian
release. This bug is intended to serve as a marker bug to make sure
llvm-snapshot won't enter resting.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
Please remove gdc on hurd-i386, not supported anymore.
Thanks,
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: buildd.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
Please set llvm-gcc-4.2 to be i386 and amd64 only.
Thanks,
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
Please remove llvm on ia64, mips, mipsel, which will now be unsupported.
Thanks,
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Here is a reduced testcase based on libssh2. I get the ICE with gcc-4.3 -O2
only.
typedef long unsigned int size_t;
typedef struct _LIBSSH2_SESSION LIBSSH2_SESSION;
typedef struct _LIBSSH2_CHANNEL LIBSSH2_CHANNEL;
typedef struct _LIBSSH2_SFTP LIBSSH2_SFTP;
typedef struct
It seems I gave-it back too, at the same time, hadn't seen your mail yet ... :-)
2009/8/19, Andreas Barth a...@not.so.argh.org:
* Paul Wise (p...@debian.org) [090819 15:28]:
It appears the main difference between failure and success in the
experimental buildds was gcc-4.3 4.3.3-13 vs 4.3.3-14.
Hello Charles,
Would you mind login on albeniz, do a manual build, and try to figure
out why the testcases are failing?
Thanks,
Arthur.
2009/8/16, Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org:
Hello, Alpha porters.
Do you have a hint on why staden-io-lib fails to build on Alpha but not on
other
Thanks for your report. I'm trying to have this fixed asap.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
The missing dir separator has been added, the fix is in our svn. Now a
few comments about your bug report:
2009/5/8, Goswin Brederlow goswin-...@web.de:
# Broken path. Missing a '/'?
Yes, fixed.
* Duplicate entry after canonicalize
Not an issue.
! Path for the wrong target
Not an issue as
Hi,
2009/4/13, Nick Lewycky nicho...@mxc.ca:
It seems that libffi-dev puts ffi.h in a target-specific directory on each
platform. For example, on my system it's in /usr/include/i486-linux-gnu/
which
is a directory that is used by absolutely no other package in Debian.
Notably, gcc doesn't
Right. This is a recent regression, from 4.3.3-7 upload. The multiarch
patch has been changed and seems to be off. I'll have a look, thanks
for reporting!
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
2009/4/11, Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be:
I've attached a reduced test case that gives a simular error message:
Awesome! Thanks, I'll forward it upstream.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
2009/4/11, Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be:
Awesome! Thanks, I'll forward it upstream.
I've already done that.
Then please send the forwarded command to the BTS.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Probably my fault, I'll have a look. Thanks for reporting.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: inkscape
Version: 0.46-6
Severity: serious
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Tags: patch
Hi,
The linker defaults to relax option, which causes the GPREL16 relocation
errors. A quick workaround is to add -Wl,--no-relax to LDFLAGS.
--- inkscape-0.46/debian/rules 2009-03-29
Hey Manuel,
No problem, I'll have a look and test it in a very few days, thanks a
lot for it!
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: network-manager
Version: 0.7.0.97-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Tags: patch
Hi,
network-manager_0.7.0.97 fails to build on alpha because of a false-positive
warning from gcc-4.2 (should not happen with gcc-4.3), here is a quick patch
to fix it, which can be
Package: openmpi
Version: 1.3-2
Severity: serious
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Tags: patch
Hi,
There is an issue with using TIMER_CYCLE_COUNTER as TIMER on alpha
(it uses TSC), so alpha should use TIMER_GETTIMEOFDAY. Here is a quick
patch:
--- a/ompi/contrib/vt/vt/configure
+++
Package: gssdp
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Build failed on alpha because of:
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for LIBGSSDP... configure: error: Package requirements
(glib-2.0 = 2.18 gobject-2.0 = 2.18
Package: gupnp
Version: 0.12.6-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Build failed on alpha because of:
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for LIBGUPNP... configure: error: Package requirements
(glib-2.0 = 2.18 gobject-2.0 = 2.18
tags 510616 + unreproductible
thanks
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 08:32:20PM +0100, Hramrach wrote:
Compiling the attached file takes ~10s with gcc 4.2 and ~ 6min with gcc
4.3
Most people would think the compiler has lockued up already.
gcc-4.3 -O2 -g -Wall -Wno-parentheses -o parse.o -c
retitle 504684 [Fixed in 4.4] gcc-4.3: __attribute__((const)) breaks
__attribute__((warn_unused_result))
thanks
The bug is fixed in GCC 4.4 from trunk.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
forwarded 504684 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR38560
thanks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
notforwarded 504684
forwarded 502283 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR38560
thanks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tags 507090 + wontfix
thanks
The package has been reintroduced (version 1.16.0-1) to the archive only for
spu (powerpc and ppc64 only) and the testing version is not supposed to build
on anything else.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reopen 499746
found 499746 0.10~pre34-1
thanks
Still fails to build.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 08:57:22PM +0200, Roberto Bagnara wrote:
A new PPL 0.10 snapshot that should fix this problem
is available at
ftp://ftp.cs.unipr.it/pub/ppl/snapshots/
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 08:14:31PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
tags 499931 + patch pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for gdc-4.2 (versioned as 0.25-4.2.4-3.1) will
upload provided that it builds correctly. Note that the maintainer
should look into pruning unneeded
Package: gawk
Version: 1:3.1.6.dfsg-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi,
There is a regression in the testsuite on arm, from the build log:
[...]
|rand
|./rand.ok _rand differ: char 2, line 1
|make[2]: [rand] Error 1 (ignored)
[...]
|1 TESTS FAILED
[...]
Here is a patch taken from upstream
Package: gawk
Version: 1:3.1.6.dfsg-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
Here is a watch file for gawk, plase include it:
version=3
opts=dversionmangle=s/\.dfsg// \
http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gawk/gawk-([\d\.]+)\.tar\.gz
Thanks,
Arthur.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 11:19:25PM +1200, Brendon Green wrote:
Attempting to resend the info. in smaller chunks. I will try to send
the sched.i.gz file as a series of attachments (hopefully this is
supported by the bugs.debian.org mailer)
It does, please send it.
signature.asc
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 08:14:36AM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
It might be GNU/kFreeBSD specific or linuxthreads specific.
Please, could you test whether it crashes also on hppa ?
It does:
$ ./a.out
dlopen: 0x157e0
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
(gdb) run
Starting program:
Package: gdc-4.1
Version: 0.25-20080616-4.1.2-23
$ gdc-4.1 --version
gdc-4.1 (GCC) 4.1.3 20080623 (prerelease gdc 0.25 20080419, using dmd 1.024)
(Debian 0.25-20080616-4.1.2-23)
This should be 20080616 with dmd 1.30.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 06:52:23PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hi Petter,
Petter Reinholdtsen [2008-05-29 18:04 +0200]:
Thank you for the patch. Why should this be done in the initscripts
package, and not in some cell specific package? I would otherwise
believe it would fit better
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 07:19:41PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
Hello,
This patch also fixes amd64-i486, plus it includes the above patch for
powerpc.
Cheers
Why do we need cross-compilers between biarched archs ? ``gcc -m32'' on amd64
and ``gcc -m64'' on i386 are fine. Also, please rebase
block 482820 by 483236
thanks
ncu NMUed, just missing fwbuilder now.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hi,
libswt-gtk-3.3 |3.3.1-3 | testing | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386,
ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
According to swt-gtk's changelog libswt-gtk-3.3 is superseded by
libswt-gtk-3.3-java-gcj. Is there any reason this package is still in testing
,
Arthur.
From 11ed7202154729cb5d27c0fb6c3d43c72438b44c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arthur Loiret [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 18:17:16 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] * Make GCC-4.3 the default on i386 and amd64:
- gcc-4.3 4.3.0-5 has the -mcld switch turned on by default
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 03:53:25PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20080523-1
Severity: serious
Heya,
Building the snapshot package failed on my buildd when preparing the
sources:
This is because the sparc-biarch patch conflicts with the recent
way is very simple, here is a patch. But Thiemo is perhaps
working on a better fix to have unified headers on all mips ABIs. They were
some ABI changes in gcc and long double is no longer an alias to double.
From c3292fa59f608d6162f528c6dc72e300332f0e06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arthur Loiret
and
debian/libn32ffi-dev/usr/include/ which fails.
There is also a small typo (s/32n/n32/), this patch fixes the problems.
From 1468a32948c2a04d016b7f4cd0f9c9b9998a7fc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arthur Loiret [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 13:37:19 +
Subject: [PATCH] Fix build
With this patch /usr/include/mips64-linux-gnu/ is installed in both
libn32ffi-dev and lib64ffi-dev, please wait for my next patch.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Thiemo,
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 04:13:20PM +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote:
With this patch /usr/include/mips64-linux-gnu/ is installed in both
libn32ffi-dev and lib64ffi-dev, please wait for my next patch.
Here is the diff between header from mips and mips64 builds (it is the same for
mips64
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:10:28AM +0200, Alexis Huxley wrote:
Fine, you are right, the package name might be wrong, but the bug exists.
If I try to install 'gcc' (that should recreate the symlink, right?) then
I get:
The following extra packages will be installed:
gcc-4.2
I
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 09:59:18PM +0400, Jan Trofimov wrote:
Package: gcc
Version: 4.3.0-4
Im running Debian unstable on FS Pocket Loox 720. And gcc nor 4.3 nor 4.2
version doesn't compile anything:
kotoko720:~# uname -a
Linux kotoko720 2.6.21-hh14-128M #44 PREEMPT Sat Sep 22 20:04:17
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 09:37:02PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Will you do an upload for ia32-libs-gtk at the same time with the
removed packages, proper replaces and conflicts and check rdepends?
Sure. And if you're already OK I can do the uploads today.
signature.asc
Description:
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 10:34:05PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
No.
Please post a full patch and I'll double check it and do the upload.
Here are the two source packages including debdiffs and amd64/ia64 binaries:
http://ada.lri.fr/~arthur/ia32-libs/
Thanks,
Arthur.
signature.asc
Hi,
I'm interested in helping you maintaining wine, esp. I'd like to try again to
replace the amd64 hack. Thanks for creating an alioth group. :-)
Arthur.
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 03:09:08AM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Since my time may be limited in the future,
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:50:53PM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
Anyway, are you a Debian Developer? What Debian packages have you worked
on before?
NM, here's my QA page [0]. I've mainly worked on toolchain (see binutils,
gcc-4.3, gdc-4.1 and gdc-4.2 changelogs), llvm, and a few other things.
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 04:33:47PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
Hi,
a new upstream version is available
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=135773
it has a number of fixes with respect to 0.7.0. If needed I could possibly
give a hand in packaging it.
Thanks,
Free
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 12:05:32PM +0200, Cyprien LAPLACE wrote:
Can you please report this upstream ? See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
I'll need to test it on bare and fresh gnu compiler, which I don't have
right now. I'll compile one.
The gcc-4.3 from sid is up-to-date to the
severity 472867 normal
thanks
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:38:53PM +0100, Cyprien LAPLACE wrote:
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Not that much.
gcc-4.3 forgets some checks in -O2 and -O3, tested on x86_64 and arm
(cross-compiler) targets.
Can you please report this
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:48:36PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Okay, I announce a NMU to fix this on april 6.
A NMU on *april* 6 should be okay if the problem is not fixed in the
meanwhile. Thanks already.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
It works here in an up-to-date sid chroot:
% gcc-4.2 -m32 hello.c file a.out
a.out: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux
2.6.8, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped
Please give me the result of:
% dpkg -l gcc gcc-4.2 gcc-multilib
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:55:49PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Index: debian/changelog
===
--- debian/changelog(révision 3018)
+++ debian/changelog(copie de travail)
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+gcc-defaults (1.71) unstable;
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 04:49:35PM +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote:
Why not libgnatvsn-dev and libgnatprj-dev as well?
Oups, didn't see that:
ifneq (,$(findstring gnat, $(no_packages)))
no_packages += libgnatvsn-dev libgnatprj-dev gnat-doc
endif
Sorry.
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:55:49PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Index: debian/rules
===
--- debian/rules(révision 3018)
+++ debian/rules(copie de travail)
@@ -256,6 +256,10 @@
no_packages += gcc-spu g++-spu
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:28:56AM +0200, Friedrich wrote:
gcc-4.2 -m32 hello.c
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.2.3/libgcc_s.so when searching for -lgcc_s
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.2.3/libgcc_s.so when searching
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:30:28AM +0200, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote:
gdc is not broken on sparc, there is just no D runtime lib on sparc yet.
gdc on sparc has a different behaviour and doesn't react as expect for
most of the users. Having a build dependency on it is a problem. For the
moment, I
reopen 461101
reassign 461101 gcc-defaults
found 461101 1.69
retitle 461101 gdc should not be built on sparc
severity 461101 normal
merge 461101 475857 475863 475864 475865 475866 475867 475869
thanks
gdc is not broken on sparc, there is just no D runtime lib on sparc yet.
gdc-4.1 and gdc-4.2
severity normal
thanks
Install newlib-spu or add -nostdlib if you want to link without spu libc. I'll
add newlib-spu to gcc-4.3-spu's Recommends.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 02:32:36PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
Package: gcc-4.3-spu
Version: 4.3.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package
Package: ftp.debian.org
newlib-m68hc1x binary package is currently built from newlib-m68hc1x source
package. I'd like to build it from newlib source package now, there is no
reason to have the same source in the archive twice.
gcc-m68hc1x will have a broken Suggests on newlib-m68hc1x until
tags 474825 + pending
thanks
Will upload tomorrow.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tags 468339 + pending
thanks
Thank you Seo, workaround pushed in git repo.
Arthur.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
: Arthur Loiret [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:10:43 +
Subject: [PATCH] Support MIPS triarch.
---
debian/control | 24 +---
debian/libn32z1-dev.dirs|1 +
debian/libn32z1-dev.install |2 ++
debian/libn32z1.dirs|1 +
debian
here: http://ada.lri.fr/~arthur/zlib/
Thanks. :-)
Arthur.
From 82dc670c2ac5ffa51e68b7827d3dbfee0bf7b4cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arthur Loiret [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:10:43 +
Subject: [PATCH] Support MIPS triarch.
---
debian/control | 24
:44.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+fakeroot-ng (0.09-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer Upload.
+ * fix_gcc-4.3_headers.patch: Add. Closes: #472564
+
+ -- Arthur Loiret [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:50:26 +
+
fakeroot-ng (0.09-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream
2001
From: Arthur Loiret [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 01:19:13 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Support MIPS triarch.
---
debian/control | 27 +--
debian/rules | 62 ---
2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 11 deletions
Oups, forgot to add .install files. It just needs a symbol files update now.
From 54bde15a1efb9cde5933ffaeb1e2fb9b74f9fb2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arthur Loiret [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 01:19:13 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Support MIPS triarch.
---
debian/control
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 05:03:59PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
[snip]
+--- ./portable/libtorrent/src/entry.cpp2008-03-31 20:53:14.0
+
./portable/libtorrent/src/entry.cpp2008-03-31 21:05:16.0
+
+@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
+
+ #include algorithm
+
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+miro (1.1.2-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer Upload.
+ * Add libffi-dev to Build-Depends.
+ * debian/patches/80_gcc-4.3_headers.patch: Add. Closes: #466757
+
+ -- Arthur Loiret [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:03:51 +
+
miro (1.1.2-3) unstable; urgency
reassign 473167 gdc-4.1
thanks
Yes, this is a ppc-specific issue, thanks for reporting.
Arthur.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+sooperlooper (1.0.8c-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * NMU.
+ * 02_sooperlooper_gcc-4.3.diff: Add, fix FTBFS with gcc-4.3.
+Closes: #417699
+
+ -- Arthur Loiret [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 17 Mar 2008 00:24:45 +
+
sooperlooper (1.0.8c-3) unstable; urgency=low
* recompiled
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
