Package: libssl3
Version: 3.1.5-1
Severity: minor
The news entry for 3.1.4-2 says, "TLSv1.0, TLSv1.1 and DTLS 1.0 work only at
security level 0 (it was
previously allowed at security level 0)"
By my reading, this is saying that 3.1.4-2 changes legacy TLS to work only at
security level zero,
Package: httraqt
Version: 1.4.9-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
As written: I cannot use the package to complete any mirroring operation.
The program crashes a seccond after you start the mirroring, before any
of the download statistics are displayed (though the
Package: gnome-shell
Version: 3.38.6-1~deb11u1
Followup-For: Bug #799354
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I can confirm that this still exists in the current version.
Error messages:
Oct 29 21:56:17 CalumsBeastlyLaptop kernel:
Control: severity -1 normal
thanks
Looks like i2p got kicked out of Bullseye for this: oh, well.
On Thu, 2021-07-08 at 18:08 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu 08 Jul 2021 at 09:12AM +02, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Jun 2021, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > > -NB that decisions from before the 1st of April 2002 are not yet
> > > -recorded here.
> > > +NB that no
Resending because I am an idiot who never remembers to reply-all
> On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 21:17 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> > Am Sa., 10. Juli 2021 um 21:11 Uhr schrieb Calum McConnell
> > :
> > >
> > > I have no idea how else to describe how to reproduce
On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 20:59 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Control: gravity -1 minor
> Control: tags -1 +moreinfo +unreproducible
>
> Thanks for the bug report,
>
> I am not able to reproduce the issue. Please provide more information
> about
> how to reproduce it. It looks like something is
Package: httraqt
Version: 1.4.9-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Any attempt to run this package (on my system) fails: a check through apt-file
would make it seem that
the whole
Package: topydo
Version: 0.14-4
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Every use of topydo on my system (other than simply stating the name and getting
a task list) results in a ModuleNotFound error being printed.
I am
Package: openssh-client
Version: 1:8.4p1-5
Severity: minor
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I try to track all configuration seperately, which means
symlinking dotfiles in $HOME to a seperate folder, that is
a git repositiory. SSH doesnt
Thank you!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: plocate
Version: 1.1.5-1
Severity: minor
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
The current timer shipped by plocate simply fires the
service every day at midnight. That is bad practice,
since if everyone did it, computers would all
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com,
pkg-javascript-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: pnpm
Version : 5.18.8
Upstream Author : Zoltan Kochan
* URL :
On Mon, 2021-01-18 at 14:41 +0100, Steven De Herdt wrote:
> reopen 979966
> thanks
>
> This report actually concerns 0.65+nmu1: /usr/bin/debdelta is identical
> to the one in 0.65. Something must have gone wrong in the NMU...
>
> Thanks for the work on this package!
> -Steven
I can confirm
Of course I would be willing to help out on package maintenance: I won't
be able to do much this week, but in coming weeks I should be more helpful
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2020-12-29 at 10:36 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:23:08 -0500 Calum McConnell wrote:
>
> > I have prepared an NMU for this package. It is currently at
> > https://mentors.debian.net/package/debdelta/ . While I need a sponsor
> > to
> >
On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 01:15 +, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:03 AM Ansgar wrote:
>
> > (Bonus points if this keeps the original signature if possible.)
>
> Two separate signatures is possible for Release+Release.gpg, just
> rename the latter to .old, but what can you do
Package: mariadb-server-10.5
Version: 1:10.5.8-3
Followup-For: Bug #976147
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I can confirm that the bug existed on my install as well. I encountered it
while upgrading my Testing installation.
I solved it
I have prepared an NMU for this package. It is currently at
https://mentors.debian.net/package/debdelta/ . While I need a sponsor to
get it into Debian, I am now reaching out to ment...@lists.debian.org to
see if I can expedite the process.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Control: retitle -1 RFP: bitwarden -- fully open-source, cross-platform
password manager
Without packaging a massive number of javascript dependencies, from
angular (which might already be in Debian) to keytar, this can't be
packaged.
A person more skilled at javascript than I could probably cut
ade to get the build onto Debian infrastrucure, however, I executed the
makefile locally, as the maintainer seems to have done.
I would be happy to take over maintenance of the package, however, it isn't
officially abandoned yet.
Regards,
- --
Calum McConnell
- -- System Information:
Debi
Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Calum McConnell
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2020 12:53:52 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Fix isAlive -> is_alive
---
debdelta/debdelta | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debdelta/debdelta b/debdelta/debdelta
index b4a79c1..b7f258c 100755
--- a/de
Package: debdelta
Version: 0.65
Followup-For: Bug #962203
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
Control: severity -1 grave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
The function is removed in Python 3.9, which is now the debian default.
Debdelta-upgrade will now simply crash. This is
Package: pngcrush
Version: 1.8.13-0.1
Followup-For: Bug #832958
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Update: it no longer gives that warning, and now simply refuses to recognize
the option. Can the manpage please be edited to reflect that?
On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 20:04 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Le 24/11/2020 à 19:06, Calum McConnell a écrit :
> > Package: debcargo
> > Severity: important
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
> >
>
> > As the freeze approach
Package: debcargo
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
As the freeze approaches, it becomes more important to make sure that every
package desired for the next release is actually
present in Debian. Many of the important
Control: reopen -1
I accidentally wrote this bug number, 971408, as the ITP bug that my new
package was closing, number 971407. As a result, the above message was
sent, and this bug was closed.
I'm sorry for the mistake,
Calum
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2020-11-09 at 10:01 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Nov 2020 20:40:50 -0500 Calum McConnell wrote:
>
> > Just as it says: I get the ending message, saying that all repos were
> > checked,
> > and a set of blank lines where I would expect to see the list of
&g
Package: myrepos
Version: 1.20180726
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Just as it says: I get the ending message, saying that all repos were checked,
and a set of blank lines where I would expect to see the list of
Package: gnome-shell
Version: 3.38.1-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
After a suspend, my laptop will present me with the username/password
prompt, at which point I can login and return to work. However,
in many
Package: afl++
Severity: minor
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
The long description finishes with this ambiguous (grammatically incorrect)
line:
"This package is a fork of the afl package that is no longer maintained"
It seems to say
Package: dwww
Version: 1.13.5
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Many packages gzip their README files, and even (often) their examples. It
saves
space, and it quite useful to me as a user, since I can (usually) just
Package: scons
Severity: minor
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
It is my understanding that documentation pacakges are typically linked
to
the packages they document by a Suggests: or a Reccomends:, however,
that is not the case for scons-doc. Thus, a potential user would'nt
be
Package: git-debrebase
Version: 9.12
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
It would be really neat if there were bash-completions for the git-debrebase
command. I could put them together, but I am currently a bit busy, so I
Package: jekyll
Severity: minor
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Jekyll upstream has been concentrating on a new 4.x release branch for the past
year. It provides a significant set of new features that I use, and it would
be great if
Package: apt-file
Version: 3.2.2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Basically, on every call to apt-update that isn't completely trivial (ie, at
least
1 package changed), my computer downloads the full 60 Mb of Contents
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Calum McConnell
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: whitakers-words
Version : 0~20.6.7
Upstream Author : Martin Keegan
* URL
Package: pulseeffects
Version: 4.8.0-1
Severity: minor
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
The package creates a huge number of .desktop files, but
doesn't put them in a common cateogory. That means that
it's hard to put them in a GNOME
Package: bpython
Version: 0.19-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
I ran some commands in my shell (bash, piped through a plain tty).
I then called bpython, and hit F1, hoping for a help display. It
just printed over the existing shell output, rather than paging it
up
Package: bpython
Version: 0.19-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
Bpython includes detailed sphinx documentation, but that doesnt appear to
be being shipped along with the package. I often work offline, and would
appreciate having access to the documentaion files when
Package: grub-pc
Version: 2.04-8
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com
Simply put, I think a lot of people would benefit from zswap being enabled by
default. Except on
very low-preformance machines, it is always an improvment. Even on those very
limited machines,
If you could add a note about this to the manpage, I'd appreciate that
Thanks!
-Calum
Package: apt
Version: 2.1.6
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hey, so "apt info" is a perfectly valid use of apt AFAIK, but
bash doesnt autoclomplete package names if you use it. I attached
a patch to fix this (at least I think I did: I might have screwed up
my reportbug usage)
It's minor, but a bit
Package: qxw
Version: 20140331-1.1
Severity: normal
Tags: a11y l10n
There has been a new upstream release of qxw, which adds a host of new features,
including unicode support and hex grids. Please update the package to provide
it!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT
Package: npm2deb
Version: 0.3.0-3
Severity: important
I am trying to use npm2deb to package bitwarden, and I cant find the
documentation
for the subcommands. 'man npm2deb' yields the manpage for npm, which states the
subcommands (ie, create, itp, license), but doesnt give the flags they take.
I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Calum McConnell
* Package name: bitwarden
Version : 1.17.2
* URL : http://www.bitwarden.com/
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Typescript
Description : fully open-source, cross-platform password manager
== Long
Package: gnome-calendar
Version: 3.36.0-1
Followup-For: Bug #955267
I am experiancing the exact same issue on month view, with this calendar
imported:
http://calendar.google.com/calendar/ical/cheshire.k12.ct.us_5dpc4689dsv5p21e2ie9nvqknc%40group.calendar.google.com/public/basic.ics
In this
I cracked open the package, and it seems almost straightforward, except
for two complications: it bundles a compiled version of GRUB for i386
and amd64, as well as some other compiled tools. I think any working
package would need to rewrite that to use a version of GRUB installed
already on the
Hi! I have interest in packaging boot-repair, as it helped to save my
own dual-boot. I started to repackage it, but I became unsure about
whether I should. It is a maintained PPA, and so it already has a
functional control file. I wasn't sure what I should put as (for
instance) the
* Calum McConnell [200324 16:30]:
> [..]
> > /usr/lib/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:92:in
> > `require': libruby-2.5.so.2.5: cannot open shared object file: No
> > such file or directory -
> > /home/calum/gems/gems/psych-3.
Package: ruby
Version: 1:2.7
Severity: important
I ran apt update recently, and got ruby 2.7, but now gem seems to have been
broken.
Ruby itself continues to work: however, all gems using native extensions seem to
have been broken.
Intrestingly, bundle install fetched and succsessfully
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.1.31
Severity: wishlist
When it comes time to upgrade or not, or pin packages, the 'p' menu requires
the user to enter the full package name
of whatever package they want to stop the upgrade of. This is undesireable for
obvious reasons, since many packages
have
Below is the email I accidentally sent directly to the maintainer,
instead of pressing reply-all
> > Sorry about taking so long to get back to you: I have been really
> > busy
> > recently.
>
> No problem, I got ill immediately afterwards! :-/
That sucks, hope you're doing better!
> But now,
Sorry about taking so long to get back to you: I have been really busy
recently.
> Hello Calum,
> thanks for using apt-listbugs and for caring about reporting the
> issue
> you experienced.
Thank you for your quick responce! Besides, what is the point of
running sid if not to find bugs and make
Subject: apt-listbugs: Listbugs-spawned QueryBTS can't find Firefox
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.1.31
Severity: normal
I triggered an update, and apt-listbugs found some bugs. I used the
b1/b2/b3 notation to query the BTS about said bugs, and read thru the
briefs on screen. I then tried to
I was unfortunate enough to have the oppoiste order of installs: the
four packages, and then URE. That meant URE's install failed, and I
was left with apt complaining about a broken system. To get out of it,
I used dpkg -r to get rid of the offending four packages, and then
installed ure. Of
57 matches
Mail list logo
