Just a request to bump this bug. While the original submitter's request (at
4.2, requesting an upgrade to 4.4 in July 2023) has been addressed with the
present version (4.4), darktable has moved on to 4.6, as of December 2023.
See: https://www.darktable.org/news/
At maintainers' convenience,
was well.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 9:56 PM Charlie Hagedorn
wrote:
> As a week has passed and regular updates haven't resolved the issue, so
> I've dug in deeper. Following a suggestion here (
> https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/446729/can-i-see-why-apt-get-install-f-is-re
change libavif16:amd64
Holding Back libgd3:i386 rather than change libgd3:amd64
Holding Back libavif15:i386 rather than change libavif15:amd64
Will report back if I find a way to resolve the issue.
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 4:31 PM Charlie Hagedorn
wrote:
> I've encountered the same behavi
I've encountered the same behavior twice. First time was a total surprise
and I had to 'apt install darktable', which fortunately worked.
Today, I noted that darktable would be removed with apt dist-upgrade
Requested output follows:
[charlie@dicke:~]$ sudo apt dist-upgrade
Reading package
I've been a happy user of dispcalgui for years. I just rebooted my machine
(Debian testing, uptime > 140 days) and went to recalibrate, only to find
that displaycal had disappeared.
Looking at this thread upstream ( https://hub.displaycal.net/issue/17813/ )
it appears that the ETA for a port to
Chiming in to confirm that a debian-testing update just now pulled
in libgegl-0.4-0:amd64 (0.4.14-2). GIMP starts up as expected with the
first jpeg I tried. My system was never apt-pinned.
Back to image editing!
Thank you, everyone who makes Debian possible!
Charlie
Great -- given that this bug is at least a week old, several people have
found fixes, and a fix hasn't yet made it into the 'testing' updates, what
is necessary to get a fix pushed to the world?
I can apt-pin like many of the correspondents in this report, and many
other reports for the same
Package: darktable
Version: 2.6.0-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Upgraded via apt-get dist-upgrade this morning. Darktable worked great prior to
the upgrade, and has for
The problem appears to have resolved itself. The computer was restarted at
least once, and has been updated at least once. A check of the dependencies
with reportbug suggests that no change in taskwarrior's dependencies
occurred.
Please close this bug at this time -- I will reply back if it
Pulled from /var/log/apt/history.log, chasing down taskwarrior's
dependencies, as found by reportbug. Taskwarrior was functioning normally
for me through at least August 23. I believe that it failed following the
August 27 update.
I haven't changed anything in my taskwarrior configuration in many
Package: taskwarrior
Version: 2.5.1+dfsg-6
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
A long-functioning taskwarrior installation fails to sync and crashes, perhaps
after a recent update.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
Package: flowblade
Version: 1.12-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Installed flowblade. sudo apt-get install flowblade
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was
Package: duplicity
Version: 0.7.16-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Running my usual scripts to interact with Backblaze B2, specifically listing
the contents of the remote
Seconded -- it was a surprise to find that I could install planner on a
Jessie box, but not a testing box, this morning.
How can we help the maintainer get a functioning copy of planner into
testing?
spending more than a day
narrowing down the problem, I'd like to save someone else the effort! :).
Charlie
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Charlie Hagedorn
charlie.haged...@gmail.com wrote:
Package: octave-ltfat
Version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I've had inconsistent
Package: octave-ltfat
Version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I've had inconsistent Octave seg-faults on several jessie machines that I've
traced to at least the octave-ltfat package. The seg-faults are triggered calls
to the Octave function rcond. Installing octave-ltfat makes
in package management that should have
prevented this error from happening? Should hugin have detected that
something was awry and failed gracefully, perhaps with an error message?
Thanks!
Charlie
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Andreas Metzler
ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org wrote:
On 2013-07-03 Charlie
Restarted X (it had been up through a few updates), and the problem with
hugin persists. Xorg.0.log attached.
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Andreas Metzler
ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org wrote:
On 2013-06-18 Charlie Hagedorn charlie.haged...@gmail.com wrote:
[:~]$ glxgears -info
Xlib
[:~]$ glxgears -info
Xlib: extension GLX missing on display :0.0.
Error: couldn't get an RGB, Double-buffered visual
[:~]$
And at this point it simply exits?
Yes.
Do you have libgl1-mesa-dri or libgl1-mesa-swx11 installed?
Looks like libgl1-mesa-dri is installed.
mesa-utils was not installed. After installing it (didn't pull in any other
packages), I get:
[:~]$ glxgears -info
Xlib: extension GLX missing on display :0.0.
Error: couldn't get an RGB, Double-buffered visual
[:~]$
[:~]$ hugin
/usr/share/hugin/data/plugins/shooting_pattern.py
CAT:initial
By switching 'Interface' to expert, I'm able to recover much of the
relevant functionality.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:50 PM, charlie charlie.haged...@gmail.com wrote:
Package: hugin
Version: 2013.0.0~beta1+dfsg-3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these
21 matches
Mail list logo
