Bug#767648: openssh-server: sshd -T outputs wrong argument for UsePAM

2014-11-01 Thread Desmond O . Chang
Package: openssh-server Version: 1:6.7p1-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, The argument of UsePAM must be yes or no, but sshd -T outputs 1 or 0. It causes sshd -T always fails on any file generated by sshd -T. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT

Bug#691361: RFS: common-lisp-controller/7.10

2012-10-24 Thread Desmond O. Chang
: #690786). -- Desmond O. Chang doch...@gmail.com Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:34:43 +0800 Regards, Desmond O. Chang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#691363: RFS: stumpwm/1:20111204.gitb1271a9-1

2012-10-24 Thread Desmond O. Chang
to remove bundled asdf.lisp . * debian/control + Upgrade Standards-Version to 3.9.3 -- Desmond O. Chang doch...@gmail.com Tue, 23 Oct 2012 01:12:50 +0800 Regards, Desmond O. Chang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble

Bug#673932: emacsen-common: emacs-snapshot installation failed with emacsen-common/2.0.2

2012-05-22 Thread Desmond O . Chang
Package: emacsen-common Version: 2.0.2 Severity: grave emacs-snapshot/2:20120521-1 cannot be installed on my system. Downgrading it to 2:20120510-1 also failed. Downgrading emacsen-common to 1.4.23 fixed this issue. The attachment is installation log. Install apel for emacs-snapshot

Bug#668375: RFS: common-lisp-controller/7.9

2012-04-11 Thread Desmond O . Chang
: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/common-lisp-controller/common-lisp-controller_7.9.dsc Changes since the last upload: common-lisp-controller (7.9) unstable; urgency=low [ Desmond O. Chang ] * debian/control + update Standards-Version to 3.9.3 * debian/compat

Bug#649707: stumpwm: StumpWM crashes after upgrade to GDM3

2011-12-13 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Deepak Tripathi dee...@gnumonk.com writes: Hi Tested the m.d.n version , its working now. Also tested clfwwm and found that Component bug is still not fixed. I need to upgrade asdf. Can you make /debian/control file in such a way that it will take upgraded version. From

Bug#651034: override: stumpwm:x11/optional

2011-12-04 Thread Desmond O . Chang
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal stumpwm_20110819.gitca08e08-2_all.deb: package says section is x11, override says devel. Stumpwm is mainly used as a standalone window manager instead of a library. Please change the override. Thanks, Des -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#649707: stumpwm: StumpWM crashes after upgrade to GDM3

2011-11-30 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Deepak Tripathi dee...@gnumonk.com writes: Desmond, Please find the information below. What's the value of this: (asdf::flatten-source-registry) * (asdf::flatten-source-registry) ((#P/usr/lib/sbcl/ :RECURSE T :EXCLUDE (.bzr .cdv .git .hg .pc .svn CVS RCS SCCS _darcs _sgbak

Bug#649707: stumpwm: StumpWM crashes after upgrade to GDM3

2011-11-29 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Deepak Tripathi dee...@gnumonk.com writes: Desmond, I don't think that this could be an issue, I have .sbclrc file with the following information. (require 'asdf) Now if you run sbcl and type (find-package :asdf) it will return you true. What's the value of this:

Bug#649707: stumpwm: StumpWM crashes after upgrade to GDM3

2011-11-24 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Deepak Tripathi dee...@debian.org writes: Package: stumpwm Version: 1:20110819.gitca08e08-1 Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, I have updated my system to gdm3/gnome3 and after upgrading stumpwm has not been functioning properly. At first glace i thought its a StumWm bug but later when i

Bug#648415: clfswm executable fails to start

2011-11-11 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz j...@gnu.org writes: The following error: *** - LOAD: A file with name /usr/share/common-lisp/source/cl-asdf/asdf.lisp does not exist This happens with any invocation of clfswm, no need to call it via startx. Are you using clisp? Is cl-asdf installed? clfswm

Bug#648415: clfswm executable fails to start

2011-11-11 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Jose A. Ortega Ruiz j...@gnu.org writes: On Fri, Nov 11 2011, Desmond O. Chang wrote: Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz j...@gnu.org writes: The following error: *** - LOAD: A file with name /usr/share/common-lisp/source/cl-asdf/asdf.lisp does not exist This happens with any invocation

Bug#647544: Component clfswm not found

2011-11-05 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi, Simon Chopin chopin.si...@gmail.com writes: Package: clfswm Version: 20111015.git51b0a02-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, When trying to start clfswm, I just get this error message and then the program exits : *** - Component clfswm not found

Bug#625979: emms: Installation hangs if /root/.emacs.d/emms doesn't exist

2011-05-11 Thread Desmond O. Chang
[ CC the maintainer for emacs-snapshot. ] On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:31, Arnaud Fontaine ar...@debian.org wrote: tags 625979 + unreproducible thanks Hello, I cannot reproduce  the issue with the current version  of Emacs in Sid, namely  23.3+1-1,  after  purging  the installed  package  and

Bug#625979: emms: Installation hangs if /root/.emacs.d/emms doesn't exist

2011-05-07 Thread Desmond O . Chang
Package: emms Version: 3.0+20110418+1.4a15eea-1 Severity: important Emms installation hangs after the following messages: Setting up emms (3.0+20110418+1.4a15eea-1) ... emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor emacs emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor emacs-snapshot

Bug#624636: stumpwm: sbcl hangs if asdf has already been loaded

2011-04-30 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi Kanru, On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 16:51, Kan-Ru Chen kos...@debian.org wrote: My meager patch attached. Thank you for your patch. But I decide to make a big change. I move those startup options into /usr/lib/stumpwm/load.lisp. I hope this can simplify /usr/bin/stumpwm. I have uploaded a

Bug#624472: stumpwm: Cannot run /usr/bin/stumpwm

2011-04-28 Thread Desmond O . Chang
Package: stumpwm Version: 1:20110313.gitb77c69a-1 Severity: important Some lisp implementations have dropped CLC package. This makes /usr/bin/stumpwm unusable. We should use ASDF facilities instead. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500,

Bug#617501: clisp does not run, claims to be missing a required file

2011-03-18 Thread Desmond O. Chang
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 03:24, Agustin Martin agmar...@debian.org wrote: Does this mean that this bug report really belongs to clisp? I think so. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#617501: clisp does not run, claims to be missing a required file

2011-03-11 Thread Desmond O. Chang
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 00:42, Peter Van Eynde pvane...@debian.org wrote: I'm all in favor of your work and I think that you are doing the right thing, but I'm missing the following: - documenting what lisp packages should do - documenting what lisp implementation should do - documenting

Bug#616676: dh-lisp: Variable $implementation needs a declaration/initialization

2011-03-06 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Package: dh-lisp Version: 0.7.0 Severity: important dh_lisp doesn't work in 0.7.0. The error message is: Global symbol $implementation requires explicit package name at /usr/bin/dh_lisp line 158. Global symbol $implementation requires explicit package name at /usr/bin/dh_lisp line 158.

Bug#616676: dh-lisp: Variable $implementation needs a declaration/initialization

2011-03-06 Thread Desmond O. Chang
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 03:42, Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org wrote: Desmond O. Chang doch...@gmail.com writes: dh_lisp doesn't work in 0.7.0.  The error message is: Global symbol $implementation requires explicit package name at /usr/bin/dh_lisp line 158. Global symbol $implementation

Bug#616631: stumpwm: SBCL cannot load contrib/cpu.lisp in linux kernel 2.6.37

2011-03-05 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Package: stumpwm Version: 1:20110213.git34362e5-1 Severity: normal The error message is: The value NIL is not of type (OR (VECTOR CHARACTER) (VECTOR NIL) BASE-STRING PATHNAME FILE-STREAM). Since /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/ has gone in linux kernel 2.6.37, the following sexp:

Bug#616309: ITP: clfswm -- A(nother) Common Lisp FullScreen Window Manager

2011-03-03 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Desmond O. Chang doch...@gmail.com * Package name: clfswm Version : 20110227.git98bbb72 Upstream Author : Philippe Brochard pbroch...@common-lisp.net * URL : http://common-lisp.net/project/clfswm/ * License : GPL3

Bug#608017: closed by doch...@gmail.com (Desmond O. Chang) (Bug#608017: fixed in stumpwm 1:20110213.git34362e5-1)

2011-03-01 Thread Desmond O. Chang
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 15:25, servilio servi...@gmail.com wrote: On 1 March 2011 02:56, Desmond O. Chang doch...@gmail.com wrote: Hi servilio, On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 18:58, servilio servi...@gmail.com wrote: This is a problem in the clisp package, CLX works in 2.48, but not in 2.49 even

Bug#608017: closed by doch...@gmail.com (Desmond O. Chang) (Bug#608017: fixed in stumpwm 1:20110213.git34362e5-1)

2011-02-28 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi servilio, On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 18:58, servilio servi...@gmail.com wrote: This is a problem in the clisp package, CLX works in 2.48, but not in 2.49 even with clisp-module-clx installed: How do you start stumpwm? If you exec /usr/bin/stumpwm, it should work. If you load stumpwm in

Bug#614571: SBCL goes into repl after stumpwm exits

2011-02-22 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Package: stumpwm Version: 1:20100709.gitf6262b0-1 Severity: normal This causes that X cannot exit after stumpwm exits. The command should have --eval '(quit)' at the end. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386

Bug#609047: ITP: ccl - Clozure CL

2011-01-12 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi Darren, On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 03:16, Darren Hoo darren@gmail.com wrote: * URL             : http://www.clozure.com/clozurecl.html I think http://ccl.clozure.com/ provides more information. For now I have built the packages that can work with Common Lisp Controller setup ie,

Bug#607910: ITP: libfixposix -- Replacement for inconsistent parts of POSIX

2010-12-23 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Desmond O. Chang doch...@gmail.com * Package name: libfixposix Version : 20101223.git080e618 Upstream Author : Stelian Ionescu sione...@cddr.org * URL : http://common-lisp.net/project/iolib/ * License : BSL Programming

Bug#606785: stumpwm: package fails to upgrade properly from lenny

2010-12-21 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi gregor, On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 23:28, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:15:55 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote: What surprises me is that common-lisp-controller _does_ depend on adduser. Do we need a Pre-Depends here since adduser is used in the .preinst

Bug#568062: Prompted for changed configuration file /etc/lisp-config.lisp

2010-12-21 Thread Desmond O. Chang
forcemerge 601957 568062 thanks This bug should be closed since it's the same as #601957. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#560963: cl-cffi: Loading cffi fails

2010-12-21 Thread Desmond O. Chang
forcemerge 560781 560963 thanks This bug should be closed since it's the same as #560781. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#606785: stumpwm: package fails to upgrade properly from lenny

2010-12-20 Thread Desmond O. Chang
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 04:15, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote: What surprises me is that common-lisp-controller _does_ depend on adduser. Do we need a Pre-Depends here since adduser is used in the .preinst? Or moving adduser to 'postinst configure'? Which one is right? Thanks, Des

Bug#606067: unblock: cl-asdf/2:2.011-1

2010-12-18 Thread Desmond O. Chang
It seems that both you and Mehdi don't receive the author's mail.  His mail has been sent to debbugs.  Do I need to forward it to you? Hi, I have to confirm again. Did you receive the mails from the author and me? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#606067: unblock: cl-asdf/2:2.011-1

2010-12-18 Thread Desmond O. Chang
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 23:29, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: Most of his answer seemed to be about why we should accept the newer version of cl-asdf rather than the source format change; lintian didn't like the empty diff.gz and people on IRC told me to do it aren't the

Bug#606067: unblock: cl-asdf/2:2.011-1

2010-12-12 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi Adam, On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 03:40, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:35 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote: I will contact the author and let him decide. Any news on that? It seems that both you and Mehdi don't receive the author's mail. His mail has

Bug#606067: unblock: cl-asdf/2:2.011-1

2010-12-06 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi Mehdi, On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 17:06, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote: I might have skipped something. Could you please explain why it's important to have this version in Squeeze? and which rc-bugs does it fix? (It looks like none but I could be wrong). The upstream author uses the

Bug#606067: unblock: cl-asdf/2:2.011-1

2010-12-06 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi, On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 05:44, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote: On 12/06/2010 07:17 PM, Desmond O. Chang wrote: And, it even (silently) turn the package into a source format 3.0 which isn't acceptable at this point of the freeze. Do you mean it must be 1.0?  But common-lisp

Bug#606067: unblock: cl-asdf/2:2.011-1

2010-12-05 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package cl-asdf cl-asdf (2:2.011-1) unstable; urgency=low * Mostly same as 2.010.9: several minor tweaks and bug fixes since 2.010. * Will be happier: users of

Bug#606068: unblock: common-lisp-controller/7.5

2010-12-05 Thread Desmond O. Chang
on cl-asdf (= 2:2.009-1) + Suggests: darcs for 'clc-clbuild setup' (Closes: #578740). -- Desmond O. Chang doch...@gmail.com Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:37:16 +0800 common-lisp-controller (7.4+nmu2) unstable; urgency=high * Non-maintainer upload. * Same as 7.4+nmu1, but also when preinst is invoked

Bug#601957: pending NMU

2010-11-10 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi Serafeim, On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 05:28, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org wrote: Hi again, On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:31:29AM +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote [edited]: I have a question about the patch.  If I remove (not purge) c-l-c first, I will also encounter the conflict when I

Bug#601957: pending NMU

2010-11-06 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi Serafeim, Is it a reasonable patch for the conffile conflict? I think it will delete the file even if user has modified it. I'm looking for the solution about that too. If you ensure your patch is correct, would you please merge it into our git repo? Thanks, Des On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at

Bug#593179: common-lisp-controller: clbuild with ccl fails to use user-writable cache for compiled files

2010-08-19 Thread Desmond O. Chang
What is the value returned by (asdf::compute-output-translations) ? Could you provide your operation? On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 08:32, John Foerch jjfoe...@earthlink.net wrote: Package: common-lisp-controller Version: 7.2 Severity: normal When clbuild is configured to use ccl (instead of

Bug#590104: sbcl: fails to install on a xen vps

2010-07-23 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Package: sbcl Version: 1:1.0.18.0-2 Severity: important SBCL falls into LDB when I install it on a xen vps. Here is the output from aptitude: Unpacking sbcl (from .../sbcl_1%3a1.0.18.0-2_i386.deb) ... Processing triggers for man-db ... Setting up sbcl (1:1.0.18.0-2) ...

Bug#589185: common-lisp-controller - clc:list-systems is missing.

2010-07-21 Thread Desmond O. Chang
2010/7/16 António P. P. Almeida peru...@gmail.com: Package: common-lisp-controller Version: 7.2 Severity: normal The (clc:list-systems) function is not provided in my currently installed version of clc. Looking at the code I see that the symbol in question is not exported and there's no

Bug#588294: dh-lisp: fails to link the ASD file

2010-07-06 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Package: dh-lisp Version: 0.6.4 Severity: normal dh_lisp will fails to link the ASD file if the file name has perl regex metacharacters, e.g., the plus character in cl+ssl.asd. Here is a patch: diff --git a/dh_lisp b/dh_lisp index 3ed88bc..e425a4b 100644 --- a/dh_lisp +++ b/dh_lisp @@ -156,7

Bug#587345: Calling `slime-changelog-date' returns nil

2010-06-27 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Package: slime Version: 1:20100605-1 Severity: normal If cl-swank does not exist when I install slime, slime-changelog-date will return nil. Also slime-protocol-version will be nil in the compiled file. This causes that I will be asked for a confirmation when I call slime-connect. I think

Bug#546205: cl-asdf: infinite loop in defsystem

2009-09-11 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Package: cl-asdf Version: 1:20090819-2 Severity: important Function parse-component-form invoked by defsystem falls in an infinite loop when it evaluate function %define-component-inline-methods. My patch is included in attachment. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT