Bug#812366: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: Kernel panic due to reading /sys/block/bcache?/bcache/writeback_rate_debug (bch_cached_dev_show)

Package: src:linux Version: 3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u1 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Hello. I experienced a bug in module "bcache" of linux kernel (a reduced photo is attached, a less reduced photo you can download from [1]). [1]

Bug#775436: ITP: xlennart -- An XBill fork but with Lennart and SystenD instead of Bill and Wingdows

Hello. Is it really necessary to discuss this on debian-devel@? IMHO, it's local issue, yet… And also please sorry for my English skills. On 01/16/2015 03:48 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote: On 16/01/15 08:15 AM, Stephan Seitz wrote: On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 07:32:41AM +1100, Riley Baird wrote: (Also,

Bug#775436: ITP: xlennart -- An XBill fork but with Lennart and SystenD instead of Bill and Wingdows

On 01/16/2015 06:34 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: [...] On 16.01.2015 14:48, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote: I'd also object on the technical grounds that we already have xbill and the changes in xlennart don't truly justify a fork. This could be easily solved by merging xbill with xlennart to xperson

Bug#775436: ITP: xlennart -- An XBill fork but with Lennart and SystenD instead of Bill and Wingdows

On 01/16/2015 08:05 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote: On 16/01/15 12:17 PM, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote: I see. By the way, it's _not my_ changes. I'm just a Debian user that tries to get more experience of Debian packaging. I found the project (xlennart) and just wanted to make a package and find a sponsor

Bug#775436: ITP: xlennart -- An XBill fork but with Lennart and SystenD instead of Bill and Wingdows

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dmitry Yu Okunev dyoku...@ut.mephi.ru * Package name: xlennart Version : 1.1 Upstream Author : Gethyn Thomas Quail xylem2...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/xaionaro/xlennart * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: C

Bug#775436: ITP: xlennart -- An XBill fork but with Lennart and SystenD instead of Bill and Wingdows

Hello. On 01/15/2015 08:26 PM, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote: * URL : https://github.com/xaionaro/xlennart Sorry. Pasted a wrong URL. The real URL is: https://github.com/Xylemon/xlennart Best regards, Dmitry. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#775436: ITP: xlennart -- An XBill fork but with Lennart and SystenD instead of Bill and Wingdows

Hello. On 01/15/2015 11:04 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 20:26 +0300, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote: Description : An XBill fork but with Lennart and SystenD instead of Bill Please, give it a rest. This isn't funny or clever. What do you mean? XBill is fine, but XLennart

Bug#775436: ITP: xlennart -- An XBill fork but with Lennart and SystenD instead of Bill and Wingdows

. Moreover I don't see any offense or problem if somebody will create game XDmitryYuOkunev (Dmitry Yu Okunev is my name). And what does Debian constitution says? It forbids such packages? It's fine to be opposed to systemd, but don't do to Lennart Poettering what the gamergate people did to Anita

Bug#620511: ipt-netflow: changing back from ITP to RFP

Hello. On 05/27/2013 05:24 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: This is an automatic email to change the status of ipt-netflow back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. I've prepared the packages [1, 2] and I'm

Bug#770731: ITP: symlookup -- Utility for object symbol search in installed libraries

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dmitry Yu Okunev dyoku...@ut.mephi.ru * Package name: symlookup Version : 0.5.2 Upstream Author : Andrew A Savchenko birc...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/symbol-lookup/ * License : GPL-3

Bug#765070: [PKG-OpenRC-Debian] Fwd: Re: Bug#765070: openrc: [kfreebsd] segfault in loopsolver

On 10/18/2014 06:01 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: Dmitry: I believe Steven reproduced it with kFreeBSD 9.0. Sorry for my total idiocy, but what should I do to repeat the bug? Debian/kFreeBSD 7.6.0 [1] uses FreeBSD kernel of version 9.0 already: # uname -a GNU/kFreeBSD debian 9.0-2-amd64 #0

Bug#727708: The tech ctte isn't considering OpenRC at all

Hello. On 01/19/2014 01:11 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:19:45 +0100, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org: Oh, really? Then can you explain why https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391945 has not been marked as fixed? It is the view of the upstream maintainers that the

Bug#727708: Bits from linux.conf.au

Hello. On 01/14/2014 10:32 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: Sergey B Kirpichev writes (Re: Bug#727708: Bits from linux.conf.au): On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 06:05:47PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: I would expect the community for that init system to do the work. So the burden on maintainers ought to be

Bug#727708: Bits from linux.conf.au

Hello. On 01/13/2014 03:57 PM, Алексей Шилин wrote: In his talk [2] at 13:50 Marc briefly touched the init system choice question. Perhaps it's worth taking into account. [2]

Bug#727708: init system other points, and conclusion

Hello. I'm writing to you to request to do not use no systemd, nor upstart. I can guess that you have very important reasons to discuss this possibilities, but… IMHO, systemd doesn't even fit to UNIX philosophy [1]. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_philosophy Sorry if I'm wrong.