Bug#825394: systemd kill background processes after user logs out
If there were ever any doubt, this surely settles it: systemd truly is the pulseaudio of process control!
Bug#507223: qprof fails on static executables
Package: qprof Version: 0.5.2-5 Severity: normal qprof does not work on static executables. build whatever program: gcc blah.c qprof ./a.out and it should work. Do this, however: gcc -static blah.c qprof ./a.out and you will silently get no output from qprof. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: ia64 Kernel: Linux 2.6.24.2 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages qprof depends on: ii libc6.1 2.7-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libpfm3-3.2 3.2.070507-1.1 Performance Monitor Unit (PMU) -- ii libunwind70.98.5-8 A library to determine the call-ch qprof recommends no packages. Versions of packages qprof suggests: pn oprofile none (no description available) pn pfmon none (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#507227: segfault with qprof -e
Package: qprof Version: 0.5.2-5 Severity: important the qprof '-e' feature seems broken. For example: $ qprof -e CPU_CYCLES top [1]22180 segmentation fault qprof -e CPU_CYCLES top -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: ia64 Kernel: Linux 2.6.24.2 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages qprof depends on: ii libc6.1 2.7-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libpfm3-3.2 3.2.070507-1.1 Performance Monitor Unit (PMU) -- ii libunwind70.98.5-8 A library to determine the call-ch qprof recommends no packages. Versions of packages qprof suggests: pn oprofile none (no description available) pn pfmon none (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#407877: [ia64] binutils ld now more than 50x slower linking large C++ codes on ia64
Package: binutils Version: 2.17-3 Severity: important Hi there, binutils is currently more than 50x slower linking large C++ codes than it was some months ago. Is Debian's 2.17-3 a reasonably recent upstream tree? -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: ia64 Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.4 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages binutils depends on: ii libc6.1 2.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries binutils recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#402124: pfmon --system-wide no longer works
Package: pfmon Version: 3.2.060926-2 Severity: normal Hi there, pfmon --system-wide no longer works: e.g. the command: pfmon --system-wide -e CPU_CYCLES used to do something, but now pfmon returns immediately. I guess this happened after an upgrade, but I couldn't tell you exactly when. :( Sorry! Thanks as always, Duraid -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: ia64 Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.4 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages pfmon depends on: ii libc6.1 2.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libelfg00.8.6-3 an ELF object file access library ii libpfm3-3.2 3.2.060926-2 Performance Monitor Unit (PMU) -- pfmon recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340298: www.debian.org/ports unclear about ia64
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: Package: www.debian.org Severity: important www.debian.org/ports says about ia64: This is a port to Intel's 64-bit architecture. Without further any warning/information about that other 64bit architecture intel, amd etc are producing: amd64. A *lot* of people try to use ia64 installation media to install Debian on their Opteron's etc, and then mail (for example) debian-cd that the cd is broken and doesn't boot. heh, if people can't figure that out, just how far do you expect them to get with Debian once they *do* get it installed? Look, I'm all for user-friendliness and idiot-proofing as much as the next guy but this is really pushing it. The paragraph in question could and IMHO should be more elaborate, like, saying it's Intel *alpha* 64, aka Itanium, and mention it's a high-end processor that's not available in consumer's computer shops at all, and also mention there exists another 64-bit processer made by Intel and others, that is *not* ia64, but rather 'amd64'. IMHO there are two sane options: - refer to architectures by their historical names, i.e. the first popular names for architectures: IA-32 is x86, amd64 is x86-64 (note that this is what AMD called it for the first few years of its life) and Itanium/IPF/whatver is IA-64. - refer to architectures by whatever companies currently call them; here you run into problems because the PR droids in these places are battling it out, so the names change once in a while and different companies give the same thing different names: Intel *today* call x86 IA-32 but AMD call it x86, however Intel call x86-64 EM64T (stupid, IMO) while AMD call it AMD64 (equally stupid, with an added element of desperation). (filed at important due to the huge amount of confusion this and maybe some other debian.org pages cause in this regard). If this is really causing such a huge amount of confusion, may I suggest the following: a great big NO CLUE? YOU WANT THIS ONE icon taking people to the x86 installer, and a little l337 hax0r/I actually know what that is under my desk icon taking people to all the others. my $0.02, Duraid -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#269927: coqide segfaults on startup
Apologies, but I lost access to the IA64 workstation on which I saw that bug. Sorry to bother everyone, but I guess it's best to close this bug. If I run into it again in the future, I'll try to fix it myself. Apologies once again, Duraid -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
