Hi guys,
2011/6/13 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk:
tags 630349 upstream
thanks
On 11-06-13 at 11:38am, Petr Salinger wrote:
the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD.
Thanks for reporting, Petr!
@Frank: Please have a look: http://bugs.debian.org/630349
fixed for 2.2.1.
-f
Hi guys,,
2011/8/17 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk:
On 11-08-16 at 01:34am, Stefano Rivera wrote:
Apparently at some point I uploaded a netatalk backport to a Launchpad
PPA, and people have been asking me to update it. I found the
additional following issue when building it on oneiric:
---
2011/7/5 Alan Snelgrove alansnelgr...@mac.com:
I found a work around for this Bug, which works for me.
in source package netatalk/etc/afpd/directory.c
there are the lines
if ((ret = lchdir(cfrombstr(dir-d_fullpath))) != 0 ) {
LOG(log_debug, logtype_afpd, movecwd('%s'): ret: %u,
2010/12/5 Alfredo Sola report...@solucionesdinamicas.net:
Package: netatalk
Version: 2.1.4-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch upstream
This happens with netatalk on sid and squeeze at least. There is a patch from
upstream at:
From: Jonas Smedegaard jo...@jones.dk
...
This one is not a bug, however, but a shortcoming of upstream code which
cause breakage each time we bump the BerkeleyDB version.
Rescue is near though, from the manual [1]:
Note that the first version to appear after Netatalk 2.1 ie Netatalk
2.1.1,
2010/4/29 Jonas Smedegaard jo...@jones.dk:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 02:07:37PM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
From: Jonas Smedegaard jo...@jones.dk
...
This one is not a bug, however, but a shortcoming of upstream code which
cause breakage each time we bump the BerkeleyDB version.
Rescue is near
2010/2/6 Yuxuan Wang fishyw...@gmail.com:
Package: netatalk
Version: 2.0.5-3
Severity: important
after upgrade, the dhx2 auth is unusable, got the following log in
syslog:
afpd[25514]: PAM DHX2: libgcrypt versions mismatch. Need: 3086019268
It's trying to complain that the installed
Hi Jonas,
2010/2/7 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk:
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 01:11:11PM +0100, Frank Lahm wrote:
2010/2/6 Yuxuan Wang fishyw...@gmail.com:
after upgrade, the dhx2 auth is unusable, got the following log in
syslog:
afpd[25514]: PAM DHX2: libgcrypt versions mismatch. Need
2010/1/20 Fabian Greffrath greffr...@leat.rub.de:
Ahh, problem isolated: The proper option to use is
--with-openssl-dir=no - so the convenient DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=openssl
will be preserved :-)
Sure?!
# ./configure --with-openssl-dir=no|grep -i ssl
checking for SSL... /usr (enabling RANDNUM
2010/1/20 Fabian Greffrath greffr...@leat.rub.de:
Am 20.01.2010 16:34, schrieb Frank Lahm:
# ./configure --with-openssl-dir=no|grep -i ssl
checking for SSL... /usr (enabling RANDNUM and DHX support)
SSL:
CFLAGS = -I/usr/include/openssl
./configure --help | grep ssl
--with-ssl
2009/12/1 Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org:
Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk (01/12/2009):
My builds using cowdancer+pbuilder on amd64 and i386 with a fully
up-to-date Sid shows no such things.
Note I'm talking about porter boxes, so a bit more than just chroot +
Build-Depends.
Perhaps some
2009/6/16 Itai Seggev is+deb...@cs.hmc.edu
Any other suggestions?
Although you're only reporting this problem with a rc and the final is
alread available, whatever causes your error may still be present.
Therefore I'm digging into this and will be talkin to the libtool
folks. Stay tuned.
2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:33:23AM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
2009/6/16 Itai Seggev is+deb...@cs.hmc.edu
Any other suggestions?
Although you're only reporting this problem with a rc and the final is
alread available, whatever causes your error may
2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:59:23AM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:33:23AM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
2009/6/16 Itai Seggev is+deb...@cs.hmc.edu
Any other suggestions?
Although you're
2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk
You've asked those patches before, and I told you not (as upstream)
to worry about those pathces to autogenerated files): I agree that
they are not of concern for upstream.
But you are *not* patching _generated_ files here. You are patching
2009/6/15 Itai Seggev is+deb...@cs.hmc.edu:
Package: netatalk
Version: 2.0.4~rc2-1
Severity: serious
Okay, perhaps I am cluless or there's something seriously wrong with my
system,
but this has never failed me in the past. I am try to rebuild the package
from
source to enable openSSL.
Hi,
MAXSRV does NOT set the maximum number of afpd connections! It sets
the maximum number of cnid_dbd processes of which one is necessary per
volume.
What probably does affect the maximum number of possible afpd
connections is the very low default value of fd_table_size (see man
cnid_dbd) which
17 matches
Mail list logo
