Bug#522659: updated proposal

2009-06-30 Thread Gilles Debunne
Joachim Reichel wrote : What about the following package layout (I just give the essential files, no symbolic links, documentation, etc.). Basically it is a slightly updated version of my proposal (1): libqglviewer-headers: (could probably be Arch:all) - /usr/include/QGlViewer/qglviewer.h (and

Bug#277196: QGLViewer debian package name

2005-06-09 Thread Gilles Debunne
if there are any other issues. -- Gilles Debunne. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#277196: QGLViewer debian package name

2005-06-09 Thread Gilles Debunne
You don't need to provide it yourself, thats what we debian developers are here for, That's what I meant, I should have written provide support for Debian packaging. If you want, you can add the debian packaging information (a debian subdir with some text files in it) to your main tree.

Bug#277196: QGLViewer debian package name

2005-06-09 Thread Gilles Debunne
gtk comes in mind, it has at least two gl widgets of its own. Sure I guess if you support qt/wx and gtk you have pretty much everything covered gui-wise. Will the 2.0 release alreadyt be separated? I can look at the gtk porting then if you want to. No. The port to other widgets needs