Bug#1006337: Testing on stable release

2022-02-24 Thread Hanno Stock
Yes, I'd be available. Thank you for tracking down the source of the issue!

Bug#1006337: libexpat1: Latest security updates of libexpat on buster and bullseye break libwbxml

2022-02-23 Thread Hanno Stock
Package: libexpat1 Version: 2.2.10-2+deb11u2 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@security.debian.org Dear Maintainer, after several hours of debugging our SOGo installation, we found out that libwbxml in general was not able to parse any previously parseable XML documents. Expected result:

Bug#994892: evdi-dkms: fails to build for kernel 5.14.0-1

2021-10-01 Thread Hanno Stock
Thanks, I attached the upstream bug report. It seems they don't have a patch yet - or at least not one that is halfway verified to be correct. I'll keep an eye on it and probably package a development version as soon as they have a fix in. In the past it took quite a while till they made a

Bug#960391: fixed in experimental

2020-06-10 Thread Hanno Stock
yes, I'll definitely do it this week. Just swamped at work right now.

Bug#960391: fixed in experimental

2020-05-14 Thread Hanno Stock
I have asked debalance to upload 1.7.0 to experimental. autopkgtests in a VM run fine (module is built).

Bug#948983: (no subject)

2020-01-15 Thread Hanno Stock
Thanks for reporting. This has been reported upstream, already: https://github.com/DisplayLink/evdi/issues/172 Basically I am waiting for a fix from upstream. The patch mentioned in the bug report changes quite a few things (related to installation, etc.) and I would prefer if someone splits it

Bug#933538: Proposed fix for stable

2019-11-28 Thread Hanno Stock
@7c6fcba7e7c4e5cfe6f7aa145ec8598876b7db97 ** + + * UNRELEASED + * 40_rel3.6.10_01-gnutls_epoch_set_keys-do-not-forbid-random-padding.patch +from upstream GIT master: Fix interop problems with gnutls 2.x. Closes: #933538 + + -- Hanno Stock Thu, 28 Nov 2019 17:03:35 +0100 + gnutls28 (3.6.7-4

Bug#933538: Please fix in stable

2019-11-28 Thread Hanno Stock
I think this would be a candidate to be fixed in stable. I'll look into applying and testing the patch for buster. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#945586: autodep8: autopkgtest-pkg-dkms testsuite should set restriction isolation-machine

2019-11-27 Thread Hanno Stock
Hi, nice. Thank you! I noticed that on a default setup kernel-headers are not installed and so tests do still fail. See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=945594 I assume - since it is hard to generically include this as a dependency in the control file, it would be better if

Bug#945594: dkms: autopkgtest fails if kernel headers are not installed

2019-11-27 Thread Hanno Stock
Package: dkms Version: 2.8.1-3 Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, I tried to run dkms-autopkgtest via autopkgtest with autopkgtest-virt-qemu and an image built with autopkgtest-build-qemu. The dkms module fails to build because of missing kernel headers. Since it is not possible to declare a

Bug#945586: autodep8: autopkgtest-pkg-dkms testsuite should set restriction isolation-machine

2019-11-27 Thread Hanno Stock
Package: autodep8 Version: 0.8 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, autodep8 generates restrictions Restrictions: needs-root, allow-stderr for dkms packages. However testing dkms packages in a container environment fails, since usually the host kernel is not installed inside the container and

Bug#935729: Workaround

2019-11-25 Thread Hanno Stock
For anybody looking for a workaround - Salsa has built packages that should work: https://salsa.debian.org/hansto-guest/evdi/-/jobs/393486/artifacts/download New version is not yet released, due to problems with the DKMS autopkgtests.

Bug#928874: (no subject)

2019-08-01 Thread Hanno Stock
Thank you! Applied your patch to git, will be released with the next update.

Bug#889994: (no subject)

2019-08-01 Thread Hanno Stock
Thank you very much! Any chance we can get this fix in stable, also?

Bug#933538: (no subject)

2019-07-31 Thread Hanno Stock
also fails with 3.6.9-1 from experimental - so I guess this should be forwarded upstream...

Bug#933538: (no subject)

2019-07-31 Thread Hanno Stock
This bug seems very similar to #929907, however the fix from the mentioned bug does not seem to fix this problem with even older server versions. I think this is a serious regression and should be marked as serious.

Bug#933538: libgnutls30: still fails with older servers

2019-07-31 Thread Hanno Stock
Package: libgnutls30 Version: 3.6.7-4 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? First, I had problems using sogo-tool for a sogo instance connected to an older LDAP Server. Restoring a user gave this error: 2019-07-31 12:51:37.411 sogo-tool[11248:11248] Received

Bug#889994: solution found: sogo: GPG signed emails are not displayed

2019-07-30 Thread Hanno Stock
fix. From: Hanno Stock Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:32:59 +0200 Subject: Omit signedViewer altogether when not using openssl --- UI/MailPartViewers/UIxMailRenderingContext.m | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/UI/MailPartViewers/UIxMailRenderingContext.m b/UI/MailP

Bug#889994: (no subject)

2019-07-30 Thread Hanno Stock
I can confirm that the error is introduced by the patch mentioned above. When I build the debian package without the patch applied, I can view PGP signed mails, however the message "Digital signature is not valid" is displayed. While this is still a usability problem - it is much less severe. Of

Bug#889994: (no subject)

2019-07-30 Thread Hanno Stock
I reckon this could be related to us applying this patch: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sogo/blob/debian/debian/patches/0007-Do-not-use-OpenSSL-when-we-are-configured-to-use-Gnu.patch

Bug#889994: (no subject)

2019-07-30 Thread Hanno Stock
Severity: high Upstream says it works in their builds and suggests that this is a debian specific problem. Setting severity to high as this makes the software unusable for everybody who regularly receives signed mails - which especially in the Debian user group can well be many users.

Bug#862862: Problem exists also with LDAP

2019-04-04 Thread Hanno Stock
I can confirm this also happens with user authentication via LDAP. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#924310: xrdp: post-install script fails

2019-03-11 Thread Hanno Stock
$ sudo tail -n 100 /var/log/xrdp.log [20190311-13:57:54] [INFO ] starting xrdp with pid 10763 [20190311-13:57:54] [ERROR] xrdp_listen_main_loop: listen error, possible port already in use [20190311-13:57:54] [DEBUG] Closed socket 11 (AF_INET6 :: port 0) This looks strange. Might be related to

Bug#924310: xrdp: post-install script fails

2019-03-11 Thread Hanno Stock
Package: xrdp Version: 0.9.1-9+deb9u3 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 6.4 Dear Maintainer, on my system, xrdp fails to install. (see log) Not sure what the problem here is - if it is just missing configuration, post-install script should not fail and just skip starting the service.

Bug#784512: Remove pyside?

2019-03-01 Thread Hanno Stock
Ok, sorry - so it would be better to file bugs against these as well?

Bug#890646: having a look at this

2019-03-01 Thread Hanno Stock
I am having a look at this. Hoping to get 1.2.1 ready today. If anybody else is working on this, please give me a ping. -- Regards Hanno signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#784512: Remove pyside?

2019-03-01 Thread Hanno Stock
Control: severity -1 normal Since pyside has been superseeded by pyside2 and pyside2 is in testing, but pyside is not - should we remove pyside from sid as well? Also I think this is no longer serious, since an alternative exists and pyside won't work anyways with Qt4's removal. -- Regards

Bug#923405: RFS: pandoc-plantuml-filter/0.1.1-1 [ITP]

2019-02-27 Thread Hanno Stock
der https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/applications/pandoc-plantuml-filter and will be maintained in the Python Application Packagin Team (also set as maintainer). More information about pandoc-plantuml-filter can be obtained from https://github.com/timofurrer/pandoc-plantuml-filter. Regards

Bug#922880: Patch for Buster/Sid

2019-02-25 Thread Hanno Stock
See attached the patch for current master. Alternatively use merge request https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/sphinx-argparse/merge_requests/1 From fddc8fda48ef44398463ba36e518c8a3b80e71c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hanno Stock Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 17:08:02 +0100 Subject: [PATCH

Bug#922880: Patch for stretch

2019-02-25 Thread Hanno Stock
== parser_navigate(data, '') +assert data == parser_navigate(data, '') \ No newline at end of file -- 2.11.0 From 28285460bf2bf6787cd1d93e9d5bd100ea8b3403 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hanno Stock Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 13:09:13 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Fix aliased subcommands for Python3

Bug#922880: :path: parameter fails for subcommands with aliases

2019-02-21 Thread Hanno Stock
fixing this in stable as well. The problem does only affect the Python3 version, as subcommand aliases are not available in Python2.7. Best regards Hanno Stock -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.7 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable

Bug#922775: ITP: pandoc-plantuml-filter -- Pandoc filter which converts PlantUML code blocks to PlantUML images

2019-02-20 Thread Hanno Stock
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Hanno Stock * Package name: pandoc-plantuml-filter Version : 0.1.1 Upstream Author : Timo Furrer * URL : https://github.com/timofurrer/pandoc-plantuml-filter * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python Description

Bug#922329: RFS: python-opentimestamps/0.4.0-1 [ITP] -- library for creating and verifying OpenTimestamps proofs

2019-02-14 Thread Hanno Stock
rs.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-opentimestamps/python-opentimestamps_0.4.0-1.dsc More information about python-opentimestamps can be obtained from https://opentimestamps.org/#code-repositories. Regards, Hanno Stock

Bug#921261: ITP: python-opentimestamps -- Python3 library for creating and verifying OpenTimestamps proofs

2019-02-03 Thread Hanno Stock
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Hanno Stock * Package name: python-opentimestamps Version : 0.4.0 Upstream Author : The OpenTimestamps developers, Peter Todd * URL : https://github.com/opentimestamps/python-opentimestamps * License : LGPL3

Bug#921251: ITP: opentimestamps-client -- command line client for opentimestamps

2019-02-03 Thread Hanno Stock
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Hanno Stock * Package name: opentimestamps-client Version : 0.6.0 Upstream Author : Peter Todd * URL : https://github.com/opentimestamps/opentimestamps-client * License : LGPL3+ Programming Lang: Python Description

Bug#918992: Package in NEW queue

2019-02-02 Thread Hanno Stock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I sorted out the remainder of the packaging issues with debalance and he sponsored the package. It is now in the NEW queue: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/evdi_1.5.1+dfsg-1.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#920437: ITP: displaylink -- Proprietary driver for DisplayLink devices

2019-01-25 Thread Hanno Stock
Am Fr, 25. Jan 2019, um 17:03, schrieb Ben Hutchings: > Please consider choosing a more specific package name. Since we have > free drivers for some DisplayLink devices, we should encourage users to > use those where possible. Ok, I see. What about displaylink-nonfree ? One could also append to

Bug#920437: ITP: displaylink -- Proprietary driver for DisplayLink devices

2019-01-25 Thread Hanno Stock
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Hanno Stock * Package name: displaylink Version : 4.4 Upstream Author : DisplayLink (UK) Ltd. * URL : https://www.displaylink.com/downloads * License : proprietary Programming Lang: binary Description

Bug#918992: Other packaging efforts

2019-01-18 Thread Hanno Stock
I tested the package on stretch with the original displaylink binary from the DisplayLink Ubuntu driver. With some modifications to xorg.conf I can successfully use my additional monitors. Edvipp seems to have an incompatibility with the current version of libedvi. Everything seems to work,

Bug#918992: Other packaging efforts

2019-01-17 Thread Hanno Stock
Just to keep the information for later packaging efforts: Arch Linux has some good information on DisplayLink: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DisplayLink Also their displaylink package might give some information on what is needed for the proprietary driver part:

Bug#918992: Other packaging efforts

2019-01-17 Thread Hanno Stock
I just learned that Ross Vandergrift also independently worked on packaging: > Hi @hstock - I did some initial work, but forgot to push it. You can find > what I have here: > https://github.com/rvandegrift/evdi/tree/debian/sid/debian >

Bug#918992: Initial packaging efforts

2019-01-16 Thread Hanno Stock
Initial packaging efforts now in repository https://gitlab.com/hstock/debian-evdi I have a working evdi-dkms package and the module is loadable on current buster kernel. Library packaging and proper documentation is still pending. I plan to verify the package by using the evdipp client app

Bug#918992: ITP: evdi -- Extensible Virtual Display Interface driver used by DisplayLink

2019-01-11 Thread Hanno Stock
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Hanno Stock * Package name: evdi Version : 1.x (newest) Upstream Author : DisplayLink (UK) Ltd. * URL : https://github.com/DisplayLink/evdi * License : GPL / LGPL Programming Lang: C Description : Extensible

Bug#629547: encfs: --reverse option broken (Upstream bug 81)

2011-06-07 Thread Hanno Stock
Package: encfs Version: 1.7.2-1 Severity: normal Tags: upstream patch Scenario: * Mount a folder A to mount point B with the --reverse option (create encfs configuration) * Unmount folder A * Mount folder A to mount point B with the --reverse option again * Copy files from folder B to

Bug#513732: ITP: gebabbel -- GPS file conversion and transfer from/to GPS units

2009-01-31 Thread Hanno Stock
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Hanno Stock hanno.st...@gmx.net * Package name: gebabbel Version : 0.4 Upstream Author : Christoph Eckert c...@christeck.de * URL : http://gebabbel.sourceforge.net * License : GPL Programming Lang: C++ Description