Control: retitle -1 bind-dyndb-ldap: FTBFS with newer bind version in testing
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 08:29:54AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > conftest.c: In function 'main':
> > conftest.c:40:17: error: 'dns_libinterface' undeclared (first use in this
> > function)
> >40 |
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi Julien,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 07:35:45PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 07:33:04PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > * Julien Cristau [210413 17:32]:
> > > I'm not sure that's quite correct as it doesn't restore the backwards
> > >
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 02:47:22PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> As tracked in bug#946412, janus is unsuitable for long-term maintained
> releases
> and should therefore sbe dropped from bullseye now it is frozen.
I added a removal hint.
Given that you state that it's not suitable for a
tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 02:09:20PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Am Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 09:31:12AM +0300 schrieb Sebastian Dröge:
> > In addition to various more minor bugs, this release also fixes
> > CVE-2021-3497
> > and CVE-2021-3498 as well as other
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 08:25:53PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Please unblock package node-lodash/4.17.21+dfsg+~cs8.31.189.20210220-2
>
> I'd like to include this in bullseye if possible. Attaching the debdiff
> (uploaded to experimental already). Since I was
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 05:47:44PM +0200, Göran Weinholt wrote:
> [ Other info ]
> I've prepared a source upload for unstable and I'm holding off on
> uploading it until I receive instructions from you.
>
> unblock chezscheme/9.5.4+dfsg-4
Please go ahead
Federico,
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 08:49:54PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> The last nim upload seems to have included binary builds for amd64
> which will prevent nim to potentially go to testing (even after
> unblocked), as it needs a source-only upload with builds done on
> buildds.
>
>
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Hi Noah,
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:52:39AM -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> (I sent a similar message to debian-release recently, but am
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 10:30:18PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> This package duplicates fucntionality embedded in ruby. This is affected by
> rc bug #986806 (already fixed in ruby2.7 2.7.3-1). As discussed in the rc
> bug above, please remove this package from the archive.
Just a note for
Hi Marco,
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 02:27:10PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 14, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> > The patch looks sensible after reading the discussion in these bugs. Can
> > we have an upload soon to have exposure?
> Unless there are any objections I will do a libxcrypt upload in a
Hi Mattia,
On 4/14/21 8:18 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 02:22:54PM +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
So, if that's what you think, should I upload an inkscape with a manual
dependency on libpoppler-glib8 >= 20.09.0?
Yes, that would be useful.
I've just uploaded a
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 08:54:51PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> control: retitle -1 unblock: systemd/247.3-5
This look ok. Kibi was already in Cc for the unblock-udeb (the original mail
is quoted below).
Cheers,
Ivo
>
> Am 11.04.21 um 18:48 schrieb Luca
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 06:53:55PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 08:02:20PM +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> > There is a theoretical and a practical aspect to this issue. From a
> > theoretical point of view, the dependency relations should not be st
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 06:46:57PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> [ Reason ]
>
> Fix downloading packages from repositories without a Size field; those
> fail if the unsized package is the largest one on the server that's in
> the pipeline.
>
> Add
Hi Guillem,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 08:13:10PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-04-13 at 17:58:08 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-04-13 at 15:36:08 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> > > Please go ahead with the upload and remove the moreinfo tag from th
control: tags -1 patch
Hi Julien,
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 08:42:06AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: mercurial
> Version: 5.6.1-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20210406 ftbfs-bullseye
[...]
> > ERROR: test-archive.t
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:26:12PM +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> I can reproduce the bug when upgrading python3-joblib before
> python3-minimal. This sounds related to #954403.
Yeah, and it seems installing the new python3-minimal fixes the issue (even
after it happened). So I suspect
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 12:48:59AM +0200, Yadd wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> node-xmldom ≤ 0.4 do not correctly preserve system identifiers, FPIs or
> namespaces when repeatedly parsing and serializing maliciously crafted
> documents. This may lead to unexpected
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi David,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 04:46:35PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> Le 02/04/2021 à 16:41, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> > On 26-03-2021 20:53, David Prévot wrote:
> > > Please unblock package spip
> >
> > This package does have a bit of a track record for security
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 06:20:10PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> This is a pre-approval unblock request for dpkg.
>
> [ Reason ]
>
> This includes an RC bug fix, and an old regression affecting apt
> with auto-deconfiguring during upgrades for
Hi Simon,
There is a theoretical and a practical aspect to this issue. From a
theoretical point of view, the dependency relations should not be
stricter than necessary, to allow partial upgrades and to avoid
complicating migration to testing of library transitions.
On 4/11/21 12:37 PM,
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 03:33:23PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > I'd rather think that the situation happened because
> > elpa-pdf-tools-server links both to libpoppler and libpoppler-glib:
> > the rebuild against poppler 20.09.0 (i.e. libpoppler102) make
> > elpa-pdf-tools-server link to
Control: tags 986051 confirmed moreinfo
Hi Sam,
On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 02:13:29PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> In #985739 it was pointed out that internal symbols disappeared from
> libk5crypto.
> My bad; I noticed this, confirmed they were not externally visible, approved
> the
Hi Julien,
Do you have any comment on the merge request Andreas submitted to
ca-certificates, to allow breaking to dependency cycle in
ca-certificates-java (see mail quoted below, from #922981)?
Thanks,
Ivo
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 03:04:35AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2021
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:52:57PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> > > I wonder if all this might be caused by the breaks from libcrypt1 (against
> > > libc6 (<< 2.29-4)). Is there a way to remove the breaks without causing
> > > issues? Maybe this is
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:17:47PM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> Binary: droopy
> Architecture: source all
Please note that you uploaded binaries. If you want the fix to (potentially)
migrate to testing, you'll need to do a new source-only upload (and file an
unblock request after
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:25:01PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> Please remove the version of gnucobol in unstable. Per upstream,
> this version in not backwards compatible with any prior version.
> I made a mistake in packaging it at all.
>
> An upload of the proper
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 03:51:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > However, in all of my tests, between the unpack of the new libc6 and
> > libcrypt1
> > only other unpacks where done, and no dpkg hooks where run. If you have a
> > way
> > to reproduce the upgrade where dpkg ran the hook
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 01:44:50PM +0100, Alois Wohlschlager wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 20.11.2020, 09:13 + schrieb Niko Tyni:
> > I don't think this is related to the recent perl 5.30 -> 5.32
> > transition.
> > The report is about a buster -> bullseye upgrade, and perl in
> > bullseye
> >
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 03:44:33PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I would like to update mutter from our current heavily-patched 3.38.3
> (effectively 3.38.4~git20210309) to the upstream 3.38.4 release.
Please go ahead with the upload to unstable and
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 03:44:31PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I would like to update gnome-shell from our current heavily-patched 3.38.3
> (effectively 3.38.4~git20210306) to the upstream 3.38.4 release.
Please go ahead with the upload to unstable and
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 09:01:26PM +0100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> upstream released petsc 3.14.5 with bug fixes only.
> This will help improve the stability of the package over the lifetime
> of the bullseye release.
I'm not convinced this complies with the freeze
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 04:02:43PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Please unblock package manpages-l10n
In General, I think this is ok, if the issues below can be fixed fairly soon.
[...]
> Furthermore, I finally managed to contact Javier
package: src:libgrokj2k
version: 7.6.6-2
severity: serious
tags: ftbfs
Hi,
The latest upload of libgrokj2k to unstable fails on i386:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libgrokj2k
Cheers,
Ivo
package: debian-security-support
severity: serious
Hi,
In https://bugs.debian.org/974552 dpkg runs the debian-security-support hook
in a situation where perl is broken. This makes the hook fail, and aborts dpkg
and apt, leaving the system in a very bad state. More on the exact situation
below.
# clarify issue in 972936
retitle 972936 removal of libgcc-s1 breaks the whole system
fixed 972936 10.2.0-16
#
# purely cosmetic, as this specific issue is fixed
severity 964477 serious
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 11:31:07AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
Control: reassign -1 debiman 0.0~git20200217.fc82521-1
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 07:31:32AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> With a recent upload of mdocml the autopkgtest of debiman fails in
> testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of mdocml
> from unstable. It passes when
Hi Matthias,
On 2/23/21 1:36 AM, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
[...]
I'll have a look at fixing that.
Thanks for the quick fix!
Ivo
Hi Matthias,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 09:48:32PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: ldc
> Version: 1:1.24.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your
clone -1 -2
reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
retitle -2 dak: version checks for binaries not enforced when binary changes
from any to all
severity -2 normal
tags -2 - pending
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 09:08:46AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on one system I wondered why qdbus is still on
Hi Steve,
Thanks for the info.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:43:33AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >Could you clarify the timing for this, especially the timeline for getting
> >the
> >signature from Microsoft (as far as that can be predicted)? I'm trying to
> >assess if this could become a
Control: tags 978521 pending
Hi Steve,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 01:35:52AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 04:26:02PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> >Hi Steve,
> >
> >On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 08:39:53PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >> During a
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 09:12:53PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 08:51:36PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > I'm just passing by, but a local rebuild with `sbuild -d unstable
> > -j8 --no-arch-all` did not show this problem (on
package: src:fonttools
version: 4.19.1-1
severity: serious
tags: ftbfs
Hi,
The latest upload of fonttools cannot be autobuilt on mipsel and mips64el:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=fonttools
This is caused by the change from arch: all to arch: any, combined with the
fact that
package: src:subversion
version: 1.14.1-1
severity: serious
tags: ftbfs
Hi,
The latest upload of subversion to unstable fails on armhf and mips64el:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=subversion
On the first try, it failed on mipsel as well. Maybe the failing test is
unreliable?
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 08:24:51PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Failure:
> > AssetsTest#test_coffee-script.js_is_included_in_Sprockets_environment
> > [/<>/test/assets_test.rb:29]:
> > Expected /CoffeeScript\ Compiler/ to match
[long line truncated]
> > rails
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 01:46:46PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> error: 'Access denied for user 'root'@'localhost''
> 2021-01-21 13:20:47 5 [Warning] Access denied for user 'root'@'localhost'
> ERROR 1698 (28000): Access denied for user 'root'@'localhost'
Note that this seems ver
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 10:48:36PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: ruby-mysql2
> Version: 0.5.3-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20201226 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package
Control: severity -1 normal
Hi Holger,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 07:11:13PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> quoting from
> https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/fail/libjs-protoaculous_5+nmu1.log
> (also attached)
>
> Setting up yui-compressor (2.4.8-2.1) ...
> Setting up libjs-protoaculous (5+nmu1)
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 08:27:51PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> >> I'll test on a few of my systems to see if I can reproduce the issue.
> >
> > I can confirm similar behavior on a pinebook, although the kernel does
> > boot and actually load, and eventually displays on the LCD display
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 09:12:25AM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>Hi Paul,
>I am pretty sure the culprit is this upstream
>issue: https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/2305
>So, the bug should resolve itself when BIND 9.16.10 is uploaded to the
>archive. If not,
Hi Steve,
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 08:39:53PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
[...]
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy : Depends: shim-unsigned (=
> >
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 08:15:38PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:03:14PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2020-05-28 09:04, YunQiang Su wrote:
> > > Adrian Bunk 于2020年5月21日周四 下午3:40写道：
> > > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 06:41:34AM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> > > > >
Hi Laurent,
On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 11:03:41PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols
> > file: see diff output below
> > dpkg-gensymbols: warning: debian/libmalcontent-ui-0-0/DEBIAN/symbols
> > doesn't match completely
Control: tags -1 patch pending
Hi Colin,
On 2/8/21 11:56 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 07:17:57PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 07:06:02PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On abel in a armel chroot the issue is reproduced by running:
man -Thtml
reassign -1 man-db
retite -1 man: seccomp filter breaks groff on armel/mipsel/hppa/powerpc
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 07:06:02PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>Hi,
>On abel in a armel chroot the issue is reproduced by running:
> man -Thtml
>even on an empty man page.
>
>
Hi Bastian,
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:14:10PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: git
> Version: 1:2.29.2-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Some of the tests fail with dash, which is the default /bin/sh in
> Debian.
Why did you file this bug as serious? As noted in #972457, the build seems to
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo unreproducible
Hi Bastian,
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 02:22:31PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 10:12:14AM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> > I tried a rebuild of git 1:2.28.0-1, 1:2.29.2-1 and 1
Control: tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible
Hi Bastian,
On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 08:46:22PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Subject: FTBFS - not ok 3 - progress display breaks long lines #1
>
> Package: git
> Version: 1:2.28.0-1
> Severity: serious
>
> A rebuild of git 1:2.28.0-1 reports test
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 01:28:26AM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> forwarded 973168 https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/3895
> thanks
It seems upstream adjusted the tests to work with python 3.9.
Cheers,
Ivo
Control: tags -1 patch
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 10:03:53PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Oct 2019 23:12:00 +0200 Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > qt-gstreamer fails to build from source in unstable on amd64. A build in
> > sbuild ends with:
>
> The reproducibility rebuilds [1] show this
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 04:51:02AM +0100, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> From: أحمد المحمودي
> To: cont...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: tagging 976539
>
> tags 976539 + fixed-upstream
> thanks
Upstream fixed this by generating the pdfs using dblatex:
Control: tags -1 - patch
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 06:57:32PM +, Gordon Ball wrote:
> > This is fixed in git:
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/ipywidgets/-/commit/23daf45a127b3febe25ecefdbb7148b0f5049990
> >
> > Gordon, are you planning to upload this soon? The soft
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 03:24:29PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 29.10.20 um 15:11 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> > Hi,
> >
> > here is a suggested patch for commons-io that would prevent making the
> > test in libsis-base-java fail.
>
> It seems this is a six year old unresolved upstream
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:43:47PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: ipywidgets
> Version: 6.0.0-6
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
This is fixed in git:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/ipywidgets/-/commit/23daf45a127b3febe25ecefdbb7148b0f5049990
Control: tags -1 patch
Control: retitle -1 blkdeactive hardcodes wrong path to sort
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 04:38:45PM -0800, Rob Leslie wrote:
> On systems upgraded from stretch and without the usrmerge package installed,
> /sbin/blkdeactivate (ExecStop= of blk-availability.service) gives the
>
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 10:07:35PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
[...]
> > E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity
In my tests, it fails with a different error. This error is also
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi gustavo,
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 12:20:34PM +0100, Ansgar wrote:
> > This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
> >
> > A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> > recipients. This is a permanent error. The following
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi,
The build of mdocml has 2 issues:
> ./configure --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr
> --includedir=\${prefix}/include --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man
> --infodir=\${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var
> --disable-option-checking
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 08:07:02PM +0100, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Am 01.02.21 um 19:33 schrieb Ivo De Decker:
> > There are 2 packages that depend on arduino-core:
> >
> > Output from dak rm:
> >
> > Checking reverse dependencies...
> > # Broken Dep
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 07:06:13AM +0100, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> the arduino package got a long outstanding overhaul and is now back in
> Debian with the most recent version. Thanks for accepting the new
> package dependencies to make this possible.
>
> We now
package: mercurial
version: 5.6.1-1
severity: serious
Hi,
The mercurial autopkgtest fails with the latest git:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/m/mercurial/10134722/log.gz
It seems the output of git changed in a way that the test didn't expect.
I suspect this will be fixed
Control: tags -1 -pending
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 08:56:01AM -0500, Phillip Susi wrote:
> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > It looks like this particular issue has been fixed in gparted 1.2.0 which
> > was just released a few days ago [1]:
> >
> >> - Don't try to mask
package: webext-exteditor
version: 2.0.4-1
severity: serious
Hi,
Thunderbird 1:78.7.0-1 has 'Breaks: webext-exteditor (<= 2.0.4-1)', which
means webext-exteditor doesn't work with it.
Cheers,
Ivo
package: python3-extractor
version: 1:0.6-8
severity: serious
Hi,
Piuparts detected an installation error in python3-extractor:
Setting up python3.9 (3.9.1-3) ...
Setting up python3 (3.9.1-1) ...
Setting up python3-extractor (1:0.6-8) ...
Sorry: TabError: inconsistent use of tabs and
package: src:trapperkeeper-scheduler-clojure
version: 1.1.3-3
severity: serious
tags: ftbfs
Hi,
The latest upload of trapperkeeper-scheduler-clojure to unstable fails on all:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=trapperkeeper-scheduler-clojure
Cheers,
Ivo
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 kylin-video
Control: retitle -2 kylin-video: drop (build-)dependency on crystalhd, which
will not be in bullseye
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 09:29:03PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 21-12-2020 23:32, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Yes, there are still
package: bsdowl
version: 2.2.2-1
severity: serious
Hi,
The lastest upload of bsdowl triggers a piuparts failure:
https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/fail/bsdowl_2.2.2-1.1.log
It seems bsdowl installs files in /usr/share/mk, but that is now a symlink
(shipped by bmake), pointing to
package: src:qdjango
version: 0.6.2-3
severity: serious
tags: ftbfs
Hi,
The latest upload of qdjango to unstable fails on the buildds:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=qdjango
Cheers,
Ivo
Control: tags -1 + bullseye
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 09:39:56PM +0100, Xavier Guimard wrote:
> Package: node-express-generator
> Version: 4.0.0-2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: sid, ftbfs
Tagging bugs only 'sid' and not the tag for testing usually doesn't give the
correct result. Adding the
Control: reassign -1 frr/7.4-1
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 05:00:26PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> With a recent upload of pam the autopkgtest of frr fails in testing on
> armhf and ppc64el when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages
> of pam from unstable. It passes when run with only
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 12:56:24AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
> 'testing'.
Thanks for catching this!
I wasn't able to find this error in the tests on piuparts.debian.org. The
piuparts data passed on the
Control: severity -1 important
Hi Lucas,
Thanks for al your QA work!
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 09:45:34PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> This package only builds Arch:all binary packages. Unfortunately, I
> don't think that we have a way to indicate that such binary packages
> must be built on a
package: src:debian-reference
version: 2.76
tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
severity: serious
Hi,
It seems debian-reference build-depends on libopencc2-data, which no longer
exists.
Cheers,
Ivo
package: src:xserver-xorg-video-ati
version: 1:19.1.0-2
severity: serious
tags: ftbfs
Hi,
The latest upload of xserver-xorg-video-ati to unstable fails on mips64el,
mipsel:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=xserver-xorg-video-ati
Cheers,
Ivo
package: src:xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu
version: 19.1.0-2
severity: serious
tags: ftbfs
Hi,
The latest upload of xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu to unstable fails on mips64el,
mipsel:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu
Cheers,
Ivo
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 03:08:00PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 14:37:21 +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > On Do 10 Dez 2020 15:35:19 CET, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > We're running into the freeze of bullseye soon. The first bug I checked
> > > is still only severity
Control: tags -1 patch
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 10:10:05PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: isoquery
> Version: 3.2.3-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20200620 ftbfs-bullseye
> > ERROR: integration - Bail out!
> >
Control: tags -1 patch
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 09:37:53PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Subject: pangox-compat: FTBFS: pangox.c:282:13: error: ‘PangoFontClass’
> {aka ‘struct _PangoFontClass’} has no member named ‘find_shaper’
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 06:33:58PM +0100, Mattia Monga wrote:
> Package: snapd
> Version: 2.42.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
You didn't really explain how this is a security hole. You just asked for the
default
package: nbdkit
severity: serious
version: 1.22.3-1
Hi,
The latest version of nbdkit build-depends on libtorrent-rasterbar-dev. As
libtorrent-rasterbar is no longer in testing, this prevents migration to
testing.
Cheers,
Ivo
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:33:09AM +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> Looking at the mailer script [1], it seems it tracks the most recent autorm
> email notification timestamp (to make sure to send out a notification only
> every 20 days) for each package version separately. So this makes me
Control: reopen -1
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 01:33:36PM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>* Update libstdc++6 symbols file for armel. Closes: #954954.
It seems the issue is still present in 10.2.0-6.
Thanks,
Ivo
On 7/10/20 8:57 PM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Ivo,
Hi Mike,
I have asked for white-listing some days back. I have pinged Philipp
Kern explicitly once more (he white-listed
php-horde-javascriptminify-jsmin just the other day...).
I will close this bug, once the white-listing is in place. I am
Control: reopen -1
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 05:48:37AM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>* d/control: Add 'XS-Autobuild: yes' flag. (Closes: #953489).
Hi,
Adding this isn't enough to allow auto-building. It also needs to be
whitelisted as described in
Control: retitle -1 [britney] migrations can break build-depends
Hi,
On 6/29/20 5:15 PM, peter green wrote:
> However hypercorn just migrated to testing again, despite the fact that
> python-asynctest is rc buggy and not in testing. This leaves hypercorn
> in violation of "packages must be
package: vrms
Hi,
Please consider changing the name of this package and removing the reference
to RMS. As the description says, the package isn't based on the opinions of
RMS, but on the DFSG.
Thanks,
Ivo
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: retitle -1 don't ship automake-1.15 in bullseye
Hi,
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:34:18AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2020-02-04, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > On 2019-01-12, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 09:31:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 07:19:27PM -0700, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> apt-build build-dep with apt-cudf does not install systemd, even when it
> appears directly in the Build-Depends of the requested package. Example:
>
> $ apt-get --simulate build-dep --solver
package: aspcud
Hi,
It seems the url of the apcud homepage changed.
The new page is https://potassco.org/aspcud/
Cheers,
Ivo
1 - 100 of 1129 matches
Mail list logo
