Thank you for taking the time to report this!
The helper service is being slowly phased out in favor of the native
.conf support in SMCRoute. It'll likely be removed in a future release
(nothing set in stone). So migrating to that is recommended. However,
until that day it should of course
Hi Steve!
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 04:37:52PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Thanks for the fixes to the smcroute autopkgtests in 2.4.2-4. I've synced
> this new version into Ubuntu, and the autopkgtests have now passed on all
> architectures *except* for i386:
> [snip]
> autopkgtest [11:06:00]:
FYI, libConfuse v2.8 fixed variable expansion inside strings.
BR
/Joachim
P.S.
A v3.2.1 release (ABI bump) planned for this week.
D.S.
On 2017-06-11 12:31 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On 2017-06-03 22:35, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
unfortunately the memory leak fixes never made it into the v3.0
release, but v3.1 has them. (I've just released v3.2.)
Thanks for the hint, I'll upload it when the Debian freeze ends, which
is just
Hi,
unfortunately the memory leak fixes never made it into the v3.0
release, but v3.1 has them. (I've just released v3.2.)
All the best
/Joachim
Package: redir
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I've just released v3.1 of redir on GitHub. It adresses
the issue with vagrant-lxc that Antonio brought up in
#824698.
https://github.com/troglobit/redir/releases/tag/v3.1
Sorry for the delay!
Best regards
/Joachim
-- System
Hi Antonio,
sorry for not noticing your comment on #824698 regarding vagrant-lxc and
redir earlier!
I've just finished adding an --enable-compat to the redir configure
script. Only some testing remains before releasing v3.1
Best regards
/Joachim
Package: inadyn
Version: 1.99.4-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
the Inadyn upstream project has released quite a few new
releases since the one available in Debian.
I believe many of the bugs reported in Debian have been
fixed, e.g. HTTPS support using GnuTLS, as well as issues
about
Package: smcroute
Version: 2.0.0-5
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
the SMCRoute upstream project has released two new major
versions since the one available in Debian.
Best regards
/Joachim
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500,
Package: redir
Version: 2.2.1-13
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
recently I picked up maintenance of redir and there are now
two new releases available:
https://github.com/troglobit/redir/releases
v2.3: Integrates (almost) all Debian patches. I've tried
to be very
Source: confuse
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
there are two new upstream releases available at Martin's new
location for libConfuse, at GitHub
v2.8: A few fixes and some new features
v3.0: Major changes, including ABI bump, library no longer asserts(),
but returns error
Package: inadyn
Version: 1.96.2-1
Tags: upstream
Version 1.98.1 of inadyn is available from the new upstream at GitHub.
https://github.com/troglobit/inadyn
It likely solves most of the outstanding bugs reported in the Debian BTS.
Regards
/Joachim Nilsson (Upstream maintainer
Hi!
The fix looks good, regardless of the CVE. I've merged it, tagged a new
release and pushed it to the repository.
However, doesn't pimd run as root and if so don't you need to be root to
send SIGUSR1 to it? So, the severity of the CVE may not be critical
after all, or am I missing something
Hi Guys!
On 01/03/2011 08:05 AM, Antonin Kral wrote:
Hi Cyril,
thank you for you for your report.
* Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org [2011-01-02 23:25] wrote:
Source: pimd
Version: 2.1.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
your package no longer builds on kfreebsd-*:
| CC
Package: kfreebsd-kernel-headers
Version: 0.53
Severity: normal
It seems kFreeBSD is missing netinet/pim.h, although netinet/pim_var.h is
included. This just might have been overlooked when importing the tree.
I am working on porting pimd to Debian GNU/kFreeBSD and am trying to reuse
as much of
=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages kernel-image-2.6-k7 depends on:
ii kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7 2.6.8-16 Linux kernel image for version
2.6
-- no debconf information
--
Joachim Nilsson :: joachim AT vmlinux DOT org
+46(0)21-123348 :: http://vmlinux.org/joachim
Package: mantis
Version: 0.19.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
The following section in mantis.postinst renders the package
uninstallable on any system without the /etc/apache directory.
servers=apache apache-perl apache-ssl apache2
for webserver in $webservers; do
The previously forgotten patch has now been submitted to
dhcp3-client as issue #295064.
Regards
/Jocke
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ifupdown
Version: 0.6.4-4.10
Severity: wishlist
While trying to rebuild ifupdown I noticed that makenwdep.sh was
generating bogus output, e.g.
-e defn2man.pl : ifupdown.nw
-e notangle -R$@ $ $@
-e chmod 755 defn2man.pl
This was due to my system having
Package: nautilus
Version: 2.8.2-2
Severity: normal
This report concerns an inconsistency with the contents of different
dialogs providing basically the same function.
If I enter smb://server/share I get a dialog where I can fill in
username, domain and password. This works perfectly.
However,
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:20:42AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:27:35PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
Mon 2005-01-31 at 13:30 +0300 Simon Horman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 04:41:31PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
[1] - http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/01
Mon 2005-01-31 at 13:30 +0300 Simon Horman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 04:41:31PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
[1] - http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/01/msg00171.html
Is gconfig even maintained upstream?
Dunno, but 2.6.10-ac5 has the following changelog entry that might
be worth
Package: kernel
Followup-For: Bug #292601
Does this[1] help?
Regards
/Jocke
[1] - http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/01/msg00171.html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Package: meld
Version: 0.9.4.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
This is just a minor suggestion, you might even already be aware of it,
but here goes. I've been experimenting with trying to fix the current
meld in Debian/Sarge, but I gave up and simply checked out the latest
from branch-0_9 in GNOME
24 matches
Mail list logo
