Bug#814003: libgl1-nvidia-legacy-340xx-glx: Broken libgl1-nvidia-glx:amd64 Conflicts on libgl1-nvidia-glx-340.96

Package: libgl1-nvidia-legacy-340xx-glx Version: 340.96 Severity: normal Tags: d-i Dear Maintainer, I prefere a testing Debian installation for personal convenience but my nvidia card (Quadro FX 580) is not any more supported by the new driver > 352.79 also I foreseen to install the 'nvidia-leg

Bug#630226: grub-pc_1.99-6_amd64.deb failed to upgrade while not grub-pc_1.99-6_i386.deb?

grub-pc_1.99-14 (and dependencies) is now successful :) On 02/11/2012 09:43 PM, Joel Soete wrote: Hello φ-coder, Sorry for so late reaction, but I would like to be sure that I well understand. # fdisk /dev/sda Command (m for help): p Disk /dev/sda: 300.1 GB, 300067970560 bytes 255 heads

Bug#630226: Re: Bug#630226: grub-pc_1.99-6_amd64.deb failed to upgrade while not grub-pc_1.99-6_i386.deb?

Hello φ-coder, Sorry for so late reaction, but I would like to be sure that I well understand. # fdisk /dev/sda Command (m for help): p Disk /dev/sda: 300.1 GB, 300067970560 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 36481 cylinders, total 586070255 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sect

Bug#637281: same issue here with custom kernels build with make-kpkg

host and nvidia. With dkms 2.2, I still have to find why it doesn't run 'auto installation service' for this kernel? J. On 08/21/2011 02:55 PM, Joel Soete wrote: Hello all, I use to compile my custom kernel (for my hw) which I build with make-kpkg. I also have to install nv

Bug#637281: same issue here with custom kernels build with make-kpkg

Hello all, I use to compile my custom kernel (for my hw) which I build with make-kpkg. I also have to install nvidia-kernel-dkms (the unstable 280.13-1) and the latest virtualbox-4.1 4.1.2. All was working fine until yesterday when I build the latest linux kernel 3.0.3 for mu debian testing 64b

Bug#630226: grub-pc_1.99-6_amd64.deb failed to upgrade while not grub-pc_1.99-6_i386.deb?

Hello Colin, On 06/13/2011 05:22 PM, Colin Watson wrote: On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 03:23:42PM +0200, Joel Soete wrote: But this operation failed on 64bit env: [snip] Setting up grub-common (1.99-6) ... Installing new version of config file /etc/grub.d/10_linux ... Installing new version of

Bug#630226: Forgotten info

Hello Colin, On 06/13/2011 05:19 PM, Colin Watson wrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 03:53:41PM +0200, Joel Soete wrote: I just forgot to mention that after this failure of installation, when I try to boot from this master disk, grub fall in 'rescue' mode after error message: "er

Bug#630226: Forgotten info

Hello all, I just forgot to mention that after this failure of installation, when I try to boot from this master disk, grub fall in 'rescue' mode after error message: "error: symbol not found 'grub_divmod64_full'". I also figure out that previous operational release was the '1.99~rc1-13' but o

Bug#575550: more about: nvidia-kernel-source: New stable release 195.36.15 available

Deqr maintainer, Here is what I have to change in the module src to make it works: diff -Naur nvidia-kernel.orig/conftest.h nvidia-kernel/conftest.h --- nvidia-kernel.orig/conftest.h 2010-03-20 16:21:35.0 + +++ nvidia-kernel/conftest.h2010-03-20 19:12:10.0 + @@ -

Bug#575550: nvidia-kernel-source: New stable release 195.36.15 available.

Package: nvidia-kernel-source Version: 195.36.15-jso0 Severity: wishlist Tags: sid Hello, Just to mentionned that a new release (195.36.15) is available. Well, it failed to build from the source pkg but nothing difficult to fix (I just don't know where to put it to build a usable debian pkg?)

Bug#530357: grub-pc: grub-probe seems to fail to find the right uuid with 64bits kernel?

Package: grub-pc Version: 1.98~20091210-1 Severity: normal *** Please type your report below this line *** Hello dear grub2 maintainers, I just buy a week ago a new home PC with help to a kind supplier. This box is equipped with an quad-core Intel i7: # cat /proc/cpuinfo | more processor :

Bug#520011: arno-iptables-firewall: New mac-address-filter plugins failed :<(

Package: arno-iptables-firewall Version: 1.9.0.b-1 Severity: important Tags: patch Hello Michael, After the update of your new kind iptables firewall, internal network connections failed :<( with following messages: + /sbin/iptables -A MAC_FILTER -m mac --mac-source '00:14:22:f9:53:a2 00:60:B0:0

Bug#485122: In /etc/cron.daily/apt wouldn't it be done AUTOCLEAN before DOWNLOAD_UPGRADEABLE?

Package: apt Version: 0.7.14 Severity: wishlist Hello all, From time to time /etc/cron.daily/apt failed just because it lakes of free space in my 'archives' fs. And most of the time, it's enough to run manually apt-get autoclean to free enough space to launch again "/etc/cron.daily/apt" succes

Bug#473725: [Debootloaders-yaboot] Bug#473725: New yaboot release 1.3.14 available upstream

Hello Aurelien, > severity 473725 wishlist > thanks > No pb ;<) > On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 09:46:21AM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: > > May I ask you the favour to compile a new deb package based on this new > > upstream release (1.3.14 on <http://yaboot.ozlabs.org

Bug#473725: New yaboot release 1.3.14 available upstream

Package: yaboot Version: 1.3.13a-1 Severity: important Hello all, May I ask you the favour to compile a new deb package based on this new upstream release (1.3.14 on )? According to git Changelog, it's possible that it fixes the install issue of the debian-4.0r3 I ment

Bug#428650: module-init-tools: Upgrade fails: Tries to overwrite diversion of french man page

Hello, Sorry but release 3.3-pre11-3 doesn't fix this pb to me ;-( J. --- Pack Scarlet One, ADSL 6 Mbps + Telephonie, a partir de EUR 29,95... http://www.scarlet.be/

Bug#420735: closed by Colin Tuckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#420735: fixed in ploticus 2.33-3)

> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > #420735: Please include libploticus API (i.e. libploticus.a), > which was filed against the ploticus package. > > It has been closed by Colin Tuckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is

Bug#420735: closed by Colin Tuckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#420735: fixed in ploticus 2.33-3)

> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > #420735: Please include libploticus API (i.e. libploticus.a), > which was filed against the ploticus package. > > It has been closed by Colin Tuckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is

Bug#424903: liferea: New upstream STABLE version 1.2.14 and UNSTABLE 1.3.5

Package: liferea Version: 1.2.7-1 Severity: wishlist Hello, It seems that your 1.2.7 debian pakage in experimental works fine, why isn't it not yet push in unstable/testing? It would be great so that in experimental you could keep the upstream unstable? Thanks in advance, Joel -- Syst

Bug#418190: closed by Vincent Fourmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#418190: fixed in libtioga-ruby 1.5-1)

Vincent, too cool ;-) Thanks a lot, Joel Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report #418190: tioga 1.5 is out, which was filed against the tioga package. It has been closed by Vincent Fourmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Their explanation i

Bug#420735: Please include libploticus API (i.e. libploticus.a)

Package: ploticus Version: 2.33-2 Severity: wishlist Hello Colin, According to ploticus doc: , it's possible to compile a 'libploticus API' (i.e. libploticus.a). It would be interesting to included in a package. (personaly I am interested in because

Bug#419393: How to use a genuine gem pkg installed with debian rubygems?

Hello Daigo, In ruby's manpages (release 1.8.6-1), I finaly found the right way to work with debian way gem pkg are installed: for the rubicus gem: RUBYLIB=/var/lib/gems/1.8/gems/rubicus-0.1.0/lib export RUBYLIB It seems to me hard to manage with severall lib to install. (isn't there any means t

Bug#418166: Acknowledgement (upgrade reportbug 3.34.1 -> 3.34.2 dramaticaly failed :_()

Hi all, Release 3.35 fixes the pb. Thanks a lot, Joel Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian. This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has been received. It is being forwarded to the package maint

Bug#418190: tioga 1.5 is out

Package: tioga Version: 1.3.0 Severity: normal Hello Vincent, I just discover tioga and would like to learn more on my debian distro (unstable) but tioga release 1.5 is not yet availbale. Tia, Joel PS: btw can we expect a debian package of ctioga too? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM

Bug#418166: upgrade reportbug 3.34.1 -> 3.34.2 dramaticaly failed :_(

post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: /Debian-apt/Debian4Home-sid/archives/reportbug_3.34.2_all.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I am a bit desparate, thought: ~# dpkg -r reportbug dpkg: error processing reportbug (-

Bug#407257: lvm2: vgrename failled silently to rename a vg

Package: lvm2 Version: 2.02.06-3 Severity: normal *** Please type your report below this line *** Hello all, Some time ago, on my testing debian install, I created a vg named vg00 over a software mirror raid1 as pv for a debootstrap, as well a vg_raid5 over a sw raid5 pv for data. All seems to w

Bug#373922: python2.4-minimal fails to install

Hello Matthias, I well read some br like this one and your related advise. Unfortunately my 'apt-get dist-upgrade' (today 2006-06-17) still failled: [snip] (Reading database ... 87452 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace python-central 0.4.7 (using .../python-central

Bug#373761: mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1-6: FTBFS on hppa with new gmp-4.2: 37 of 117 tests failed

Laurent Fousse wrote: Hello, * Joel Soete [Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 03:00:54PM +0200]: Package: libmpfr-dev Version: 2.2.0.dfsg.1-4 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Hello Laurent, As you may be already read in buildd report: <http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.

Bug#373761: mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1-6: FTBFS on hppa with new gmp-4.2: 37 of 117 tests failed

Package: libmpfr-dev Version: 2.2.0.dfsg.1-4 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source *** Please type your report below this line *** Hello Laurent, As you may be already read in buildd report:

Bug#353346: gcj can't make shared libs on hppa. (followup)

Hello Matthias, Personaly I don't care of gcj but well glibc and according to jda's mail this patch would fix the mentioned pb for all gcc 4.x This is well comitted upstream, I check with some script like: svn diff --old http://gcc.gnu

Bug#348109: libgtk2.0-0: after upgrade in unstable, many gui (firefox,gftp,d4x,...) "Segmentation fault"

Hello all, just want to mentioned that new stuff I discovered: $ d4x The program 'd4x' received an X Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was 'BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)'. (Details: serial 1614 error_code 8 request_code 72 minor_code 0) (No

Bug#353480: [parisc-linux] Re: Bug#353480: yaird: [hppa] /dev/sd* device nodes not created and eth0 not enabled

> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 10:02:28PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > > udevd[862]: get_netlink_msg: unable to receive kernel netlink message: No > buffer space available > > > > > > This is the reason you aren't getting /dev/sd* nodes. I debugged > > this yesterday, needs new udev upload, more detai

Bug#353480: [parisc-linux] Re: Bug#353480: yaird: [hppa] /dev/sd* device nodes not created and eth0 not enabled

> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 10:02:28PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > udevd[862]: get_netlink_msg: unable to receive kernel netlink message: No buffer space available > > > This is the reason you aren't getting /dev/sd* nodes. I debugged > this yesterday, needs new udev upload, more details here: > htt

Bug#353480: yaird: [hppa] /dev/sd* device nodes not created and eth0 not enabled

Frans Pop wrote: Package: yaird Version: 0.0.12-3 Severity: important After a new installation on hppa, the system seemed to boot correctly, but failed to mount /boot and /home directories. Also the eth0 network interface was not brought up automatically. If I create the initrd using initr

Bug#352420: lvm2 + udev: some trouble at shutdown ?

Hello Marco, Sorry for delay but have annoying pb to access my mail ;-( > On Feb 12, Joel Soete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would just like to understand with you why this above steps ('umounting > > local fs') did also 'umount /dev', as i

Bug#352420: lvm2 + udev: some trouble at shutdown ?

Package: udev Version: 0.084-3 Severity: normal Hi all, Desperating that lvm will ever offer the 'encapsulation' of /boot in lvm like hpux does), i am trying to install a more common lvm+raid1 boot disk with following scheme: boot disk will be build on raid1 + lv, i.e: o the / (aka root)

Bug#348109: Acknowledgement (libgtk2.0-0: after upgrade in unstable, many gui (firefox,gftp,d4x,...) "Segmentation fault")

Hello Sebastien, Just to confirm an hypothesis: > fwiw, here at home, I tried exactly the same test (i.e. launch gftp > and gdmsetup from another hppa debian unstable install boxe) without > any pb??? > > Just a thought: > o here at home my X env is a Xfce runing on a i386 debian unstable >

Bug#348109: libgtk2.0-0: after upgrade in unstable, many gui (firefox, gftp, d4x, ...) "Segmentation fault"

Package: libgtk2.0-0 Version: 2.8.9-2 Severity: important *** Please type your report below this line *** Hello Sebastien, At my office, I encounter the same bad situation as describe in this br #345313 but also seems related to #321832. (so fill free to requalify it) I tried first to replace

Bug#338783: (no subject)

Hello Luigi, Luigi Gangitano wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 retitle 338783 squid: please add a boot option to clean spool (somewhere in /etc/default) thanks Hi, zapping the cache every time you reboot is not an effective choiche. Well, as mentioned in my proposal,

Bug#341970: /etc/cron.daily/apt shouldn't download-upgradeable/autoclean if update failed?

Package: apt Version: 0.6.43 Severity: minor Tags: patch Hello, I frequently noticed that: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/lib/apt/periodic# lrt total 2 drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 1024 Oct 21 18:14 .. drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 1024 Oct 24 09:31 . -rw-r--r-- 1 root root0 Dec 3 06:26 update-stamp -rw-r--r-- 1

Bug#341537: apt hang when /var is full?

Package: apt Version: 0.6.42.3 Severity: normal Hello dear apt maintainer, I noticed that daily apt update was hanging: # ps -ef | grep apt root 15277 15260 0 07:35 ?00:00:00 /bin/sh /etc/cron.daily/apt root 15287 15277 0 07:35 ?00:00:00 apt-get -qq update root 15289

Bug#338783: Acknowledgement (Couldn't it be possible to add a boot option to clean spool (somewhere in /etc/default)?)

Hello Luigi, Sorry I do have made some mistakes with reportbug: the title was: "Couldn't it be possible to add a boot option to clean spool (somewhere in /etc/default)?" Apologies, Joel Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian.

Bug#338783: (no subject)

Package: squid Version: 2.5.12-1 Severity: wishlist Hello all, Frequently after an upgrade or simply a reboot I encounter some weird pb to use my squid cache. I didn't analyse further because those pb was always solved by a stop of squid, a cleanup of the spool (rm -rf /var/spool/squid/) and a r

Bug#338187: acknowledged by developer (Bug#338187: fixed in alien 8.57)

> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > #338187: alien failed to debianize an rpm for parisc (aka hppa), > which was filed against the alien package. > > It has been closed by one of the developers, namely > Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > [...] > > We believe that the bug

Bug#338187: alien failed to debianize an rpm for parisc (aka hppa)

Package: alien Version: 8.56 Severity: normal Hello Joey, I build with success a rpm pkg from it's sources. As I did with success on i386 (with same srpm), I would like to debianize it to install it on my unstable debian hppa. Unfortunately, it failed as follow: # alien -d RPMS/parisc/eqnx-4.09

Bug#338103: kernel-package: Failed to build linux image with option "O=/usr/src/linux-2.6.build"

Package: kernel-package Version: 9.008.4 Severity: wishlist Hi all, When I build manualy a kernel 2.6, I abuse of the build option "O=/My_Kernel_Build_dir" It allow me to save a clean src tree and build as much different config as space disk allow me ;-) _without duplicate src tree_ (I trust that

Bug#325889: acknowledged by developer (Bug#325889: fixed in pdsh 2.8-1-1)

> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > #325889: pdsh: Upstream it exists a more recent version 2.7, > which was filed against the pdsh package. > > It has been closed by one of the developers, namely > Brian Pellin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > [...] > Source: pdsh > Source-Versi

Bug#326634: Acknowledgement (gksu -g /usr/sbin/firestarter hang from non root user xfce4 wm?)

Hello Yann, This is fixed since latest gksu upgrade (i.e. 1.3.5-2) Thanks again for your attention, Joel Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian. This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has been re

Bug#333766: libc6: SIGBUS in libm on hppa breaks qt-x11-free

Aurelien Jarno wrote: [...] Oh yes, BTW, I have seen that glibc does not built anymore on hppa. It seems the new binutils does not accept some assembly instructions. Currently I am doing my tests with binutils 2.16.1. It has to be fixed before uploading a new glibc, but unfortunately I d

Bug#327865: sysvinit: new 50_bootlogd_exitcode.dpatch works fine as well on i386 and hppa boxes :^)

Package: sysvinit Version: 2.86.ds1-3 Followup-For: Bug #327865 Just confirming that the mentioned patch solved the pb as well as on my i386 as on my hppa boxes :^) Hth, Joel -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (

Bug#326752: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#326752: libvte4: lake of some libvte 0.11.13-4_hppa.deb ??)

... > > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2005, Lo=EFc Minier wrote: > > I've requested a requeue at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > The package has been built and will enter the archive tonight. I'm > closing this bug. > Cool :^) Many thanks, Joel

Bug#326752: libvte4: lake of some libvte 0.11.13-4_hppa.deb ??

Package: libvte4 Version: 1:0.11.13-2 Severity: normal Hi all, Trying to install xfce4-terminal with apt-get, I encountered the following pb: The following packages have unmet dependencies: xfce4-terminal: Depends: libvte4 (>= 1:0.11.11) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages

Bug#326639: firestarter: ssh (std port 22) locked on local lan?

Package: firestarter Version: 1.0.3-1.1 Severity: normal Hello dear maintainer(s), My i386 (debian unstable install) owns two nic: eth0 & eth1. eth0 is connected to my adsl modem. eth1 for my local lan (actualy a cross cable for a parisc-linux box also an unstable debian install). As am using

Bug#326634: gksu -g /usr/sbin/firestarter hang from non root user xfce4 wm?

Package: firestarter Version: 1.0.3-1.1 Severity: normal Hello dear maintainer, My wm being xfce4 (debian unstable install), after the initial configure wizard, when I try to launch firestarter from a common user desktop menu, nothing happen: # ps -ef | grep fire jso 3358 1304 0 15:54 p

Bug#325889: pdsh: Upstream it exists a more recent version 2.7

Package: pdsh Severity: wishlist Hi all, Just discovering this tools and btw found upstream a more recent release of this pkg: 2.7. Hth, Joel -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture:

Bug#321785: fakeroot: segfaults on [hppa]

> > The buildd in question is currently running a 2.4.26-64 kernel. > Cool (I didn't thought that there was still systems running 2.4) > > In fact while simply rebuilding a kernel (as root, without fakeroot), I also > > observe a segfault with 2.6.8 and 2.6.10 (on c110 and d380) but panicing > >

Bug#321785: fakeroot: segfaults on [hppa]

-- Initial header --- >From : "Randolph Chung" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To : "John David Anglin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC : [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian-hppa@lists.debian.org,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date : Wed, 10 Aug 20

Bug#308002: gcc-4.0: lake of 'gnatgcc' build dependency (hppa)

Matthias Klose wrote: Joel Soete writes: Package: gcc-4.0 Severity: normal Hello Mathias, Trying to rebuild locally this experimental gcc-4.0 dpkg, it failled early because: thanks, fixed. still waiting for an m68k build to finish, and then I'll upload a new version. Cool ;-) checking wh

Bug#308002: gcc-4.0: lake of 'gnatgcc' build dependency (hppa)

Package: gcc-4.0 Severity: normal Hello Mathias, Trying to rebuild locally this experimental gcc-4.0 dpkg, it failled early because: checking whether the C compiler (gnatgcc ) works... no configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables. make[1]: ***

Bug#307762: gcc-4.0-hppa64: postinst didn't find 'shell' cmd

Package: gcc-4.0-hppa64 Version: 4.0.0-2 Severity: normal Hi all, This experimental gcc-4.0-hppa64 dpkg failled in postinst because: /var/lib/dpkg/info/gcc-4.0-hppa64.postinst: line 3: shell: command not found update-alternatives: --install needs Debian update-alternatives 1.10.27. Copyright (C

Bug#292927: top doesn't show right info on parisc since 2.6.10-pa7?

Hello Craig, ... > > What did I missed? Any idea? > Is it compiling or not? I'm trying to understand what is wrong other > than the top header. > That was finaly a kernel pb. It's now fixed so you can safely close this report :-) Thanks again for your attention, Joel

Bug#292927: top doesn't show right info on parisc since 2.6.10-pa7?

> -- Original Message -- > Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:44:28 +1100 > To: Joel Soete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Small) > Subject: Re: Bug#292927: top doesn't show right info on parisc since > 2.6.10-pa7? > > > On

Bug#292927: top doesn't show right info on parisc since 2.6.10-pa7?

Package: procps Version: 1:2.0 Severity: normal Hello Craig, I am running a unstable debian on parisc platform with a development linux kernel 2.6.11-rc2-pa3 :-) And I noticed this top pb: Tasks: 79 total, 2 running, 77 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 1.9% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni,

Bug#292169: apt-build failed again to build a dpkg if only src are available

Package: apt-build Version: 0.11.4 Severity: normal Hello Julien, Here is the promised br ;-) Sorry, I was busy somewhere else but I come back to you with this pb to build a pkg with only src without bin (my case is the new xfce not yet in debian but already in

Bug#291234: [Parted-maintainers] Bug#291234: parted: No Implementation: This ext2 filesystem has a rather strange layout! Parted No Implementation: This ext2 filesystem has a rather strange layout!

> > On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 11:30:42AM +, paddy wrote: > > What you can do as a workaround is use the relevant tool to remove > > the ext3 features that parted doesn't like, resize, and then add them > > back in. > > Bah, this is hacky, i would just use resize2fs directly in this case, and > an

Bug#291234: parted: No Implementation: This ext2 filesystem has a rather strange layout! Parted No Implementation: This ext2 filesystem has a rather strange layout!

Package: parted Version: 1.6.11-9 Severity: normal Hello all, I am running a debian unstable' (today updated) with a developement kernel 2.6.11-rc1-pa3 on hppa box (b2000). This system own 2 Disk: one boot disk of 9gb and a 'data' disk of 36Gb. the boot disk sda has the following slicing schema