Package: python-rbtools
Severity: wishlist
There's a new upstream version available, 0.3.2:
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/rbtools/0.3.2/
Could you please update the Debian package?
Thanks,
-Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
Package: reviewboard
Severity: normal
Review Board is now available as version 1.5.2, which has lots of
improvements. I wish it would get packaged. :-)
-Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: iftop
Version: 0.17-17
Severity: important
I just pulled 0.17-17 from experimental in order to get IPv6 support. Now
I cannot get iftop to work on any interfaces other than eth0 and lo. If,
e.g., I run it on the ppp0 (PPP) or sixxs (tunnel) interface, it merely
prints the interface
For the record, it worked fine when I just installed the 9.0 packages:
$ sudo aptitude
[selected packages in UI]
Reading changelogs... Done
apt-listchanges: Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 149860 files and directories
Package: transmission
Is there anything hindering an upload of 2.04 to unstable? I don't care so
much about the patch presented by Barak (no offense) as about being able to
upgrade to vanilla 2.04.
TIA,
-Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:
On 24/09/10 18:58, Julian Mehnle wrote:
Is there anything hindering an upload of 2.04 to unstable?
Yes, the freeze[0].
I know about the freeze. However, I thought that just affected the
migration of packages from unstable to testing?
I use testing and am
Experimental is cool, too. Thanks.
-Julian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
package wkhtmltopdf
retitle 580226 wkhtmltopdf: Do not require a running X server
severity 580226 wishlist
thanks
Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
Unless for some reason the QT dependency chain within Debian still
makes a running X server necessary, the package description should be
adjusted to
Package: wkhtmltopdf
Version: 0.9.0-1
Severity: normal
The requirement for a running X server has been removed as on 0.9.0:
http://code.google.com/p/wkhtmltopdf/issues/detail?id=3
Unless for some reason the QT dependency chain within Debian still makes a
running X server necessary, the
This is possibly also related to the problem described here (in German
only, unfornately):
http://www.ctserver.org/viewtopic.php?t=2676highlight=ownder
http://www.heise.de/ct/projekte/machmit/ctserver/ticket/102
So perhaps specifying pci=nomsi on the kernel command line is a working
stop
martin f krafft wrote:
Which sensitive bits? I am asking to be able to improve the bug
script.
Several bind mounts that were much more specific than the typical mount
point. Serial numbers in hard disk device names. Stuff like that.
I cannot figure out from the bugscript what your problem
I've been having the same problem. I'm attaching my mdadm bug script
output (with a few sensitive bits redacted). Also:
| $ sudo mdadm -Ds
| ARRAY /dev/md/0 metadata=0.90 UUID=222a461f:8303a4d2:4a90023e:7c4f4b06
-Julian
--- mount output
/dev/mapper/vg0-main_crypt on / type xfs (rw,noatime)
Package: ruby-prof
Severity: normal
There seems to be a newer upstream version available:
| $ gem list --remote ruby-prof
|
| *** REMOTE GEMS ***
|
| ruby-prof (0.7.9)
Its CHANGELOG still lists 0.7.7 as the latest version, but that seems to
be merely an oversight.
Could you please update the
This bug report is NOT related to GNU partition tables (GPT). I (the
original reporter of this bug) am NOT using a GPT.
-Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Julian Mehnle wrote:
This bug report is NOT related to GNU partition tables (GPT). I (the
original reporter of this bug) am NOT using a GPT.
Err, I meant GUID partition table of course. Still I'm not using one of
those. My partition table is MS-DOS-style.
-Julian
signature.asc
Package: rails
Severity: wishlist
Currently the rails package doesn't install ri documentation. Others have
complained (cf. #469524) about the rdoc docs already inflating the rails
package and have requested a separate docs package. I'd be happy if such
a, say, rails-doc package was created, if
Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Is there a draft package that I can test drive?
Yes. You can find the packaging here:
http://git.datenfreihafen.org/?p=stefan/clamz.git;a=summary
I tried it and it looks good. I successfully downloaded an album from
Amazon(.de).
However, one of the patches didn't
What's the status of this?
Is there a draft package that I can test drive?
-Julian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I have read
http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/rubygems.html
However it isn't clear to me, after a period of almost three years, what
the current situation is. Are there any plans for doing something about
this, however remote?
-Julian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Package: lurker
Severity: normal
A new upstream version, 2.3, with many useful bugfixes (hence normal, not
wishlist severity), has been released today:
http://terpstra.ca/lurker/message/20091030.200221.523a3e67.en.html
Please package it! :-)
-Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: bzr-builddeb
Version: 0.95
Severity: wishlist
bzr-builddeb 0.95 seems to be quite old. Can you please upload the
current package from Ubuntu? That would be nice.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Stefan Fritsch wrote:
I can't reproduce that problem. Can one of you please provide some
more detailed information about his configuration? The output of
egrep -ir '^[^#]*(sslcertificate|sslengine|virtualhost)'
/etc/apache2/*conf* /etc/apache2/*enabled
would be nice.
I cannot disclose the
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.96+20090808-1
Severity: important
I have a machine running Xen 3.2 (from the xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64
package). Previously I was using grub-pc 1.96+20080724-16 to boot the
hypervisor with a Xen-Dom0-enabled 2.6.26 Linux kernel (from the
Jonas Meurer wrote:
are you sure that the bug is related to libmimelib1c2a? did you try
whether _only_ downgrading mimelib to 1.1.2 from debian kdepim3 fixes
it an then re-upgrading to standalone mimelib 1.1.4 makes it appear
again?
Exactly this is the case. Just tried it on two different
I, too, can confirm this for 2.2.12-1.
I wasted two hours trying to figure out if there was *some* way to adjust
my configuration to make it work, to no avail. After all, I was forced
to downgrade to 2.2.11, which I was using before.
Luckily I still had the packages in my cache, or I would
Package: libmimelib1c2a
Version: 5:1.1.4-1
Severity: important
Maybe this doesn't bear any relevance now, but from my specific point of
view this issue just ruined most of my day.
I am a KDE user and have been running KDE 3.5 for a long time. I have
been deferring the upgrade to KDE 4 due to
Package: bittornado
Version: 0.3.18-8
Severity: normal
So I decided I wanted to set up a BitTorrent tracker on my server.
I browsed through the lists provided by `apt-cache --full search
bittorrent`, but nothing suitable came up.
So I just wasted 3 hours on compiling opentracker from scratch,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Package: openoffice.org-common
Version: 1:3.0.1-9
Severity: important
Unsupported version. Yes, really, although it currently is in testing.
I'm not requesting support here, I'm reporting a potential bug. If you
want me to stop, please let me
:05:58.807980882 +
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+pdns-recursor (3.1.7-5+lua) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Enable Lua scripting support.
+
+ -- Julian Mehnle jul...@mehnle.net Sat, 27 Jun 2009 23:05:47 +
+
pdns-recursor (3.1.7-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix FTBFS bug with GCC 4.4 (closes: #506003
Package: openoffice.org-common
Version: 1:3.0.1-9
Severity: important
I'm running Debian Testing. Today I upgraded OpenOffice from 2.4.1, which
was working fine, to 3.0.1. Now I cannot start OpenOffice. It just hangs
with no UI interaction or CPU usage. I then incidentally noticed that
Frans Pop wrote:
This issue is certainly not specific to Gnome. I have been seeing the
same problem for ages in KDE (using konsole with TERM=xterm).
I can confirm this. I am using KDE konsole with TERM=xterm.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: libcairo2
Version: 1.8.6-2
Severity: normal
I am using my Debian workstation via an Exceed network X server from my
Windows workstation.
I recently upgraded my workstation to the latest Squeeze. Now I cannot
run GTK applications without fonts and certain icons getting rendered in
an
attempts or something like that), causing the
interesting range up to the maximum bandwidth to be crammed into just the
right half of the screen. Being able to specify the minimum bandwidth to
display would help a lot.
Thanks for considering.
-Julian Mehnle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Package: opensync-plugin-kdepim
Version: 0.22-3
Followup-For: Bug #496909
I can confirm this:
$ msynctool --sync Pico --filter-objtype note --filter-objtype todo
--filter-objtype contact --conflict 1
Synchronizing group Pico
The previous synchronization was unclean. Slow-syncing
1.5 with
Lenny, however, is going to piss off a LOT of Subversion users.
Thanks for your consideration.
-Julian Mehnle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: grub-common
Version: 1.96+20080724-12
Severity: normal
GRUB 2 does not seem to support installing to partitionable md RAID
devices such as /dev/md/d0 or /dev/md/d0p1. When attempting, e.g.,
`grub-install /dev/md/d0`, it says:
| grub-probe: error: Unknown kind of RAID device
I just ran into this after, over a period of two days, trying to figure
out why D-I / partman doesn't allow me to partition /dev/md0, and why it
would not even recognize a manual partitioning created via `cfdisk`.
I think it would be very useful if partman supported partitionable md
devices.
A thought: The patch from #303914 might have to be partially undone in
order to (re)admit partitionable md devices.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
* Package name: pynids
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Michael J. Pomraning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://pilcrow.madison.wi.us/pynids/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python/C
Description : Python
Package: vpnc
Severity: wishlist
A new upstream release, 0.5.3, has been released today:
http://lists.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/pipermail/vpnc-announce/2008/07.html
It fixes various bugs and, in particular, fixes phase 2 rekeying
support. Please package it! :-)
-Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: eggdrop
Followup-For: Bug #487541
tag 487541 patch
thanks
Postings on the egghelp.org forums indicate that eggdrop's hanging in
background mode is caused by being compiled without Tcl thread support
while still being linked against a thread-enabled libtcl:
+++ python-dns-2.3.1/debian/changelog 2008-07-30 14:23:43.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+python-dns (2.3.1-6+ipv6safe) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Safely ignore nameserver entries in resolv.conf that list IPv6 resolvers,
+as querying those is not currently supported.
+
+ -- Julian Mehnle
Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
Not happening any longer. But up to March 13, I was getting a
different but similar message:
Can't locate object method new via package Net::DNS::RR::TXT
at /usr/lib/perl5/Net/DNS/RR.pm line 305
Since March 13, that seems to have disappeared (I assume because
Package: libpam-pgsql
Version: 0.6.3-1
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
I recently upgraded libpam-pgsql to 0.6.3-1. I now noticed that
pressing Ctrl+C during libpam-pgsql's authentication phase, e.g., when
sudo is asking for the user's password, erroneously
I can confirm this. This bug is extremely annoying and makes KAddressbook
almost unusable for me. A real productivity killer!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Kartik Mistry wrote:
Package: kmail
Version: 4:3.5.9-2
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Fixed-upstream.
See: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95615
and KDE SVN commit 675974
Your message caused the Debian bug tracker to mark this bug as fixed in
the kmail Debian
Charles Fry wrote:
reopen 297730
thanks
I am satisfied with three of the four reported problems, but as far as
I can tell you are still missing:
libnet-address-ipv4-local-perl
Yes, but this is only a suggestion, not a dependency or a recommendation,
and suggestions are not required to
Amaya wrote:
As you are aware of, #297730 is a blocker for a Release Goal
(http://release.debian.org/lenny/goals.txt - goal-recommends)
Can you report any progress on this?
None as of yet, but I'm about to upload a new upstream release and Debian
package within this week. I was busy with
Package: libpam-pgsql
Severity: wishlist
There is a new 0.6.3 upstream version of libpam-pgsql:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pam-pgsql/
There is even an Ubuntu patch that brings the Debian package up to date:
http://patches.ubuntu.com/p/pam-pgsql/pam-pgsql_0.6.3-0ubuntu1.patch
Please
Package: postgresql-common
Version: 85
Severity: minor
The optional datadir argument shown in `pg_upgradecluster` and `man
pg_upgradecluster` is not documented. I wonder what it does. Please
document it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Russ Allbery wrote:
This is a Policy proposal that's sat in the Policy bug queue with
wording and seconds for quite some time. I'd like to resurrect it and
resolve it one way or the other.
There's some room for clarification here.
I think it is apparent from comments given in 2001 the that
Don Armstrong wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008, Julian Mehnle wrote:
I think that from the final sentence it can be inferred that it
primarily intends to mandate the _binary_ package name. So while
we're discussing the binary package naming, maybe we can decide
whether the mandate should
I can confirm this. I have been observing it for nearly a year now.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: libnet-dns-perl
Severity: wishlist
A new upstream version, 0.62, was just released:
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-DNS-0.62/
It fixes various issues:
http://search.cpan.org/src/OLAF/Net-DNS-0.62/Changes
(Personally, I'm interested in a fix for rt.cpan.org #29531, which
plagues
This issue is known upstream (see bug's forwarded info).
A work-around (that's acceptable at least to me) seems to be to disable
the KDE Wallet system entirely (KDE Control Center - Security Privacy
- KDE Wallet - Wallet Preferences - Enable the KDE wallet subsystem :=
OFF).
signature.asc
Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
What's significantly different from grep-excuses in wipnity?
I have little idea since I have never used grep-excuses before. However,
from looking at it now, it seems that grep-excuses doesn't work for
source package names, and doesn't give all the information
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
The problem persists with 2.0.52-1. The URIs mentioned above are
still current.
Thank you for your help in testing this problem. I'm working through
the (rather long) list of Apache2 bugs. Could you try it again one more
time with current Apache 2.2.3 ? That would
Niko Tyni wrote:
I'm still not sure if it's worth it to rename, though.
Gregor Herrmann wrote:
Considering the arguments with versioned dependencies I'm inclined to
propose to stick with the current name.
Cost: This would be a one-time action, and we can easily supply a dummy
libmime-perl
Package: spamassassin
Severity: wishlist
SpamAssassin can use both the new Mail::SPF and the old Mail::SPF::Query
Perl modules for SPF support. Mail::SPF is fully compliant with the
final SPFv1 specification (RFC 4408), whereas Mail::SPF::Query is a
legacy implementation that has many issues and
Package: devscripts
Severity: wishlist
I'd like to suggest the inclusion of a command-line script that queries
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/. I am attaching one that I wrote and
use. It depends on w3m and libterm-size-perl.
Here's some example output to give you an idea (although it's kind of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Mehnle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: mail-spf-perl
Version : 2.005
Upstream Author : Julian Mehnle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-SPF/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Perl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Mehnle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: net-dns-resolver-programmable-perl
Version : 0.003.1
Upstream Author : Julian Mehnle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable/
* License
David Paleino wrote:
this package should be named libnet-dns-resolver-programmable-perl.
I think this can be said merely of the _binary_ package, not the _source_
package. And as I said in the ITP, the binary package will be named like
that.
See also my response on #42.
signature.asc
David Paleino wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Mehnle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: mail-spf-perl
as per Debian Perl Policy, the package should be named libmail-spf-perl.
You are probably referring to 4.2, Module Package Names:
http
Not only that, but it fails specifically for repository layouts of type 2
as well, i.e. `svn-inject -l 2`!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Not only that, but it fails specifically for repository layouts of type
2 as well, i.e. `svn-inject -l 2`!
... for native packages, I meant to say. (The patch from #433536 seems to
support non-native packages OK.)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
`perldoc -f do` says:
| If do cannot read the file, it returns undef and sets $! to the
| error. If do can read the file but cannot compile it, it returns
| undef and sets an error message in [EMAIL PROTECTED] If the file is
| successfully compiled, do returns the
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
I have now tried to reproduce your problem, but failed.
The current code that cause the warning looks like this:
if (-e $etcconfigfile) {
my $t = do $etcconfigfile;
unless ($t) {
pdebug(3, Loading config file $etcconfigfile:\n\t$!\n\t$@);
}
}
So I
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 11:49:36AM +, Julian Mehnle wrote:
So I think debarchiver should check $! and $@ rather than the result
of do() (unless ($t)), which really says nothing about whether the
file could be read and compiled successfully, UNLESS you require
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
I think you need to end the configuration file with
1;
Why would that make a difference? The last statement is ...
$gpgkey = '74E1D63F';
which returns a true value. So this is equivalent to a trailing 1;.
Please try that and tell me if the warning disappear.
As
Package: debarchiver
Version: 0.7.4
Followup-For: Bug #437508
debarchiver now _always_ warns in syslog:
| debarchiver: Warning: Loading config file /etc/debarchiver.conf:
| debarchiver: ^I
| debarchiver: ^I
even if there is no error condition!
I think you changed one log level too many from 4
Package: mailman
Version: 1:2.1.9-8
Severity: important
Followup-For: Bug #384016
It seems that #384016 is not resolved yet. I recently upgraded mailman
from 1:2.1.8-4 to 1:2.1.9-8, and now I am getting the following error
message whenever the senddigests cron job runs (i.e. daily):
| Traceback
Joost van Baal wrote:
FWIW, I've recently manually done:
ln -s /usr/lib/mailman/pythonlib /var/lib/mailman/pythonlib
after such a Mailman upgrade. It solved the shown errors from
senddigests.
Apparently, the postinst script fails to execute this under some
circumstances.
Not only that,
I agree completely. I think the new vhost/multiple-config-file support
architecture is bad. I recently upgraded from a year-old version of the
webalizer package to the current one and tried to adapt my homegrown vhost
infrastructure (which is similar to Jacob's) to the new one in order to
Robert Millan wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 11:25:26PM +, Julian Mehnle wrote:
Robert's patch needs to be dual-licensed under LGPL and BSD just like
libspf2 in order to allow the patched libspf2 to be distributed under
the BSD license in the future. Robert, would you consider
Robert Millan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 01:23:56PM +, Julian Mehnle wrote:
I can see that. However, how would dual-licensing your patch under
LGPL and BSD make your patch non-free? BSD just isn't copyleft (in
FSF terms[1]), but it's free nonetheless.
For example, BSD license
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
Any comments or objections to these patches?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;att=1;bug=430508
Thanks for your patch!
Robert Millan wrote in bugs.debian.org #430508:
spfquery segfaults when passing it a
Package: libspf2
Version: 4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 12.5
debian/copyright misrepresents the license as GPL/BSD, but libspf2's
README file says:
| The code in the libspf2 distribution is Copyright 2005 by Shevek
| and Wayne Schlitt, all rights reserved. Copyright
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Friday 13 July 2007 16:20, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
Any comments or objections to these patches?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;att=1;bug=431239
RFC conformance issues #431239 is a little more
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Upstream has released version 0.28 of Module::Build:
[...]
It fixes many bugs of 0.26 and brings many new useful features. Please
package it!
We're now at 0.2808.
I updated the Debian package:
http://files.mehnle.net/software/debian/libmodule-build-perl
Package: pdns
Severity: wishlist
PowerDNS 2.9.21 has been released upstream:
http://mailman.powerdns.com/pipermail/pdns-announce/2007-April/76.html
Please package it!
Apparently this release also addresses at least the Debian bugs #406462
and #406461. See the changelog:
package pdns-recursor
retitle 406428 pdns-recursor: initscript stop action fails if pdns-recursor
not running (e.g. if disabled in current runlevel), makes prerm script fail
thanks
It seems that the pdns-recursor initscript's stop action fails if pdns-
recursor is not running, e.g. if it has
Just wanting to follow up on a comment from Bastian Venthur in #406438:
Bastian Venthur wrote:
As the maintainer of kde-kdm-themes I don't think that desktop-base
brakes my package. I'm happy that it finally enables the new KDM theme
by default for the masses.
The problem is that it doesn't
Package: desktop-base
Version: 4.0.0
Severity: normal
After I had upgraded desktop-base to 4.0.0 yesterday, today I was forced
to see a very weird login desktop totally unlike what I had configured
for kdm and have been using for years.
At first, I was unable to find any clue whatsoever about
Package: xml2rfc
Severity: wishlist
1.32 has been released upstream:
http://xml.resource.org
Please package it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcus Better wrote:
I have a few other ideas about this package. First, I think we should
build one binary package with support for all database and
authentication options. This would simplify packaging a lot, for the
price of a few additional library dependencies, which is not so bad.
(And
Package: apache2-mpm-worker
Version: 2.2.3-3.2
Severity: important
I just tried upgrading my slightly older Debian Testing system including
the Apache 2.0 packages on it. When it came to upgrading
apache2-mpm-worker, this is what happened:
[...]
Selecting previously deselected package
Package: pdns-recursor
Version: 3.1.4-1
Severity: important
I just tried upgrading my slightly older Debian Testing system including
the pdns-recursor package on it. When it came to upgrading pdns-recursor,
this is what happened:
Preparing to replace pdns-recursor 3.1.3-2 (using
FYI, I updated the package in my HTTP directory to the 4.004 upstream
version.
pgpiiyr9hykF7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Erich Minderlein wrote:
As I learnt recently ,
run-parts executes cron and this is intended behaviour
see man cron
not a BUG.
Well, so what? Why can't a command-line option be introduced that allows
the dots? That wouldn't be incompatible with cron.
pgpG45VQFWF2X.pgp
Description: PGP
Package: spfquery
Version: 1.2.5-4
Followup-For: Bug #306875
Here's a patch that installs the `spfquery` executable as `spfquery.
libspf2` and adds update-alternatives support for it.
diff -ruN libspf2-1.2.5.org/debian/compat libspf2-1.2.5/debian/compat
--- libspf2-1.2.5.org/debian/compat
package libmail-spf-query-perl
tags +wontfix
thanks
Sorry for wontfixing this so late. The problem here is that libmail-spf-
query-perl really is a library package and not a tools package. Thus it
should not run any daemons or install any init scripts for them. Further,
Mail::SPF::Query has
Peter Fokkinga wrote:
Package: libmail-spf-query-perl
Version: 1.997-3
The Perl module Mail::SPF::Query in libmail-spf-query-perl uses
LMAP::CID2SPF but AFAIK this module is not available as a Debian
package.
When spamassassin is installed in combination with libmail-spf-query-perl
then
Package: courier-mta
Version: 0.53.2-3
Severity: important
Debian policy, section 11.6, mandates that every MTA package provide a
`newaliases` program. The courier-mta package ships such a program,
which calls `/usr/sbin/makealiases -src=/etc/aliases`. This call builds
the e-mail aliases
Package: libnet-dns-perl
Severity: normal
A new upstream release, 0.58, is available from CPAN. It includes a
number of helpful fixes (see the changelog). Please upgrade the
libnet-dns-perl package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
package isdnvboxserver
severity 202488 serious
# Justification: Breaks package on every upgrade
thanks
This bug has occurred to us multiple times, everytime I upgrade
isdnvboxserver! It always renames the spooldir to ttyI6 and thus breaks
operation. On top of this, it always gives the
Package: dh-make-perl
Version: 0.21
Severity: normal
dh-make-perl produces debian/control with an out-of-date-standards-version
3.6.1. Please make dh-make-perl produce control files that conform to
a current standards version, like 3.7.2.
It may not hurt to raise the debhelper compat level (and
Package: dh-make-perl
Version: 0.21
Severity: normal
When I build a libnetaddr-ip-lite-perl package from NetAddr::IP::Lite using
dh-make-perl and run the resulting package through lintian, I get the
following error message:
E: libnetaddr-ip-lite-perl source:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
3.33 is available on CPAN.
I made an updated Debian package based on the updates in Jonas Genannt's
3.28 package:
Incidentally, NetAddr::IP 4.001 has been released on CPAN today. This is a
major update, as it now includes NetAddr::IP::Lite (and thus XS code) and
fully
Package: xml2rfc
Severity: wishlist
1.31 has been released upstream:
http://xml.resource.org
Please package it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
