Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

Hi, itd writes: > Hi, > > Kai Harries: >> The depender will break if the dependency is not at the path where it >> used to be at build-time (by default /nix/store/...). All software >> deployed by nix contains the full path to its dependencies. And all >>

Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

Dmitry Bogatov writes: > [2018-12-29 19:54] Vincent Bernat >> > Probably not. Violations of FHS is violation of policy, and to get >> > authorization to policy violation is long road, starting with discussion >> > on debian-devel@. >> > >> > But, can't we just configure Nix to store it under

Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

Kai Harries writes: > Dmitry Bogatov writes: > >> [2018-02-26 22:46] Andrey Rahmatullin >>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:14:37PM +0100, Kai Harries wrote: >>> > > The source package you've uploaded is broken, as .dsc mentions >>> > > nix_1.11.1

Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

Dmitry Bogatov writes: > [2018-02-26 22:46] Andrey Rahmatullin >> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:14:37PM +0100, Kai Harries wrote: >> > > The source package you've uploaded is broken, as .dsc mentions >> > > nix_1.11.15-2~a1.debian.tar.xz. > > Hi! > > W

Bug#877019: ITP: nix -- Purely functional package manager

Raju Devidas writes: > On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 20:05:06 +0000 Kai Harries > wrote: >> Package: wnpp >> Severity: wishlist >> Owner: Kai Harries >> >> * Package name : nix >> Version : 1.1.15 >> Upstream Author : Eelco Dolstra >> *

Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

Hello, Andrey Rahmatullin writes: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > The source package you've uploaded is broken, as .dsc mentions > nix_1.11.15-2~a1.debian.tar.xz. My fault, GitHub doesn't like '~' in file names so I have uploaded the files with an '.' instead of '~'. I have

Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

troduction to Nix. It is a really impressive tool and I would be happy if it could be included into Debian. [1] https://nixos.org/nix/about.html Regards, Kai Harries

Bug#877019: ITP: nix -- Purely functional package manager

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Kai Harries <kai.harr...@gmail.com> * Package name: nix Version : 1.1.15 Upstream Author : Eelco Dolstra <edols...@gmail.com> * URL : https://nixos.org/nix/ * License : LGPL v2.1 Programming Lang: C++, Sh

Bug#793456: scan-build: add option '--status-bugs-or-build-error'

Package: clang Version: 1:3.5-25 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, as already reported in https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=4312 the option '--status-bugs' returns no failure if the build fails. I therefore propose a new option '--status-bugs-or-build-error' that returns an

Bug#784312: [PATCH] approx: Remove dependencies on inet-superserver

Source: approx Source-Version: 5.5-1 Tags: patch On my system I can not remove openbsd-inetd because approx depends on it: # aptitude why openbsd-inetd i approx Depends openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver Because approx has a systemd-unit file in which it is declared as socket activated, I

Bug#768977: [PATCH] debian-cd uses 'ppmtolss16' but does not depend on 'syslinux-utils'

Source: debian-cd Source-Version: 3.1.16 Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, here is my patch for the described problem. Kind regards, Kai Harries --- Index: debian-cd-3.1.16/debian/control === --- debian-cd-3.1.16/debian/control

Bug#778593: [PATCH] bootcd: Update Burning the image Section in FAQ

Source: bootcd Source-Version: 4.05 Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, it looks like the Burning the image section in FAQ.bootcd is outdated. In the example I have replaced the tool cdrecord by wodim. Kind regards, Kai Harries --- Index: bootcd-4.05/FAQ.bootcd

Bug#778597: [PATCH] bootcd: Update LiveUsbBootStick Section in FAQ

Source: bootcd Source-Version: 4.05 Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, I believe the LiveUsbBootStick section in the FAQ contains an error. At least I was not able to make it work without a few modifications. Therefore I have updated the FAQ.bootcd. Kind regards, Kai Harries --- Index: bootcd-4.05

Bug#778288: [PATCH] bootcd: bootcd2disk: Enlarge /boot partition

Package: bootcd Source: bootcd Source-Version: 4.05 Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, I experienced on two distinct machines that bootcd2disk failed because the /boot partition was to small. This trivial patch enlarges the /boot partition from 50 MB to 100 MB. Kind regards, Kai Harries --- Index

Bug#776822: xserver-xorg-video-qxl: UI unresponsive after switching to VT and back

#27 0xb750bbca in main (argc=7, argv=0xbfc15ee4, envp=0xbfc15f04) at ../../dix/stubmain.c:34 Please let me know, if you need further information. Kind regards, Kai Harries -- Package-specific info: X server symlink status: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Jan 29 10:28

Bug#773587: grub-imageboot: Document how to boot a Debian live image

, Kai Harries -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers testing-updates APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh

Bug#768977: debian-cd uses 'ppmtolss16' but does not depend on 'syslinux-utils'

that 'ppmtolss16' is part of the package 'syslinux-utils'. So I believe that debian-cd should depend on 'syslinux-utils'. Kind regards, Kai Harries -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.16-3-amd64

Bug#760309: [Simple-cdd-devel] Bug#760309: simple-cdd: build of squeeze image fails due to missing images/SHA256SUMS file

Maybe not the most elegant solution, but here is what I have come up with. Kind regards, Kai On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Vagrant Cascadian vagr...@debian.org wrote: On 2014-09-05 14:07:36 -0500, Kai Harries wrote: On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Vagrant Cascadian vagr...@debian.org wrote

Bug#760309: [Simple-cdd-devel] Bug#760309: simple-cdd: build of squeeze image fails due to missing images/SHA256SUMS file

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Vagrant Cascadian vagr...@debian.org wrote: I definitely thought about how to handle that when I implemented that feature, and decided to go for the simplicity of only supporting newer releases. OK, I tend to agree with you. What about the following: diff

Bug#760309: simple-cdd: build of squeeze image fails due to missing images/SHA256SUMS file

Package: simple-cdd Version: 0.5.0 Severity: normal Tags: upstream patch Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? $ cat simple-cdd.conf server=ftp.de.debian.org debian_mirror=http://$server/debian/; wget_debian_mirror=ftp://$server/debian/; rsync_debian_mirror=$server::debian $

Bug#755524: [Simple-cdd-devel] Bug#755524: simple-cdd: hangs at checking for missing mirror dependencies with dose-debcheck

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Kai Harries kai.harr...@gmail.com wrote: With revision 573 from bzr it is working for me (--dist wheezy). Are you planning to release your fix anytime soon? Because I noticed that in sid still only version 0.4.0 is available. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

Bug#756463: xmonad: screen is not redrawn when last window is closed

Package: xmonad Version: 0.11-8 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Start xmonad from gdm. Open a terminal. Close the terminal. * What was the outcome of this action? The terminal window was still visible as an artifact. * What outcome did you expect

Bug#755524: [Simple-cdd-devel] Bug#755524: simple-cdd: hangs at checking for missing mirror dependencies with dose-debcheck

22, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Vagrant Cascadian vagr...@debian.org wrote: Control: tags 755524 pending On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 01:31:10PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 08:34:46PM +0200, Kai Harries wrote: checking for missing mirror dependencies with dose-debcheck: amd64

Bug#755524: simple-cdd: hangs at checking for missing mirror dependencies with dose-debcheck

Package: simple-cdd Version: 0.4.0 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? I ran 'build-simple-cdd' without any further arguments from the command line. * What was the outcome of this action? The programs hangs. The last output is: getting missing