Bug#878167: RFS: cl-asdf/3.3.0 - Another System Definition Facility

2017-10-13 Thread Kambiz Darabi
> Thanks. However it looks like you forgot to push the upstream branch > and the tags. Could you please do so? Done. > Since this is a package maintained by the Debian Common Lisp Team, > you should indeed write first to the list of the team, asking for sponsorship. > If the team is alive, that

Bug#878167: RFS: cl-asdf/3.3.0 - Another System Definition Facility

2017-10-11 Thread Kambiz Darabi
> Could you please push your changes to the git repository for cl-asdf > on alioth? I just pushed the changes and an additional one for fixing https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873035 which I had forgotten. > Also, in the future, I suggest that you make requests for

Bug#878167: RFS: cl-asdf/3.3.0 - Another System Definition Facility

2017-10-10 Thread Kambiz Darabi
recommend you migrate to these supported APIs). Also stop using the deprecated COMPUTE-INIT-NAME. * Deprecation: starting to emit STYLE-WARNINGs for deprecated functions. Will gradually escalate to true WARNINGs and then ERRORs. Thank you Kambiz Darabi -- m-creations gmbh Acker 2 55116 Mainz Germany

Bug#819181: RFS: cl-asdf/3.1.7 - Another System Definition Facility

2016-04-06 Thread Kambiz Darabi
Hi Gianfranco, I have uploaded a new version with the changes. Thank you for looking into it. Kambiz

Bug#819181: RFS: cl-asdf/3.1.7 - Another System Definition Facility

2016-03-30 Thread Kambiz Darabi
> no, you can add the commit as a patch, patches are applied *before* dh_clean > and removed after the build successful. > > I converted it as patch, removed the clean override, removed quilt from b-d-i. > > Success in my machine and in a real pbuilder clean environment. This sounds great, but

Bug#819181: RFS: cl-asdf/3.1.7 - Another System Definition Facility

2016-03-30 Thread Kambiz Darabi
dpkg-buildpackage: source version 2:3.1.7-1 > dpkg-buildpackage: source distribution unstable > dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Kambiz Darabi <dar...@m-creations.net> > dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture amd64 > dpkg-source --before-build asdf > dpkg-source: info: apply

Bug#819181: RFS: cl-asdf/3.1.7 - Another System Definition Facility

2016-03-30 Thread Kambiz Darabi
Hi Gianfranco, thank you for taking care of this. > +override_dh_clean: > + dh_quilt_patch > + dh_clean > > > why? The reason is that the upstream 'make clean' deletes debian/patches completely. So without this, I'm not able to patch anything. > also adding quilt to b-d-i seems

Bug#819181: RFS: cl-asdf/3.1.7 - Another System Definition Facility

2016-03-24 Thread Kambiz Darabi
system (typically caused by symlinks) on some CL implementations. * Miscellaneous bug fixes. * Documentation improvements. * Restore original Makefile. Thank you Kambiz Darabi

Bug#809308: RFS: cl-asdf/3.1.6 [ITA] - Another System Definition Facility

2016-02-29 Thread Kambiz Darabi
On 2016-02-29 22:31 CET, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:26:36PM +0100, Kambiz Darabi wrote: >> I uploaded a new version. > > W: cl-asdf source: timewarp-standards-version (2015-10-17 < 2016-02-01) > > Please bump also the

Bug#809308: RFS: cl-asdf/3.1.6 [ITA] - Another System Definition Facility

2016-02-29 Thread Kambiz Darabi
> * in the meantime a new version of policy is out, 3.9.7. Check whether > your package is still compliant [0] and if so bump Standards-Version > ... > [0] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist Checked, and bumped. > * in d/changelog, there should be a blank line

Bug#809308: RFS: cl-asdf/3.1.6 [ITA] - Another System Definition Facility

2016-02-29 Thread Kambiz Darabi
Thank you for the heads up, Mattia. Since January, I am working on several projects and unfortunately forgot to finish the packaging. I have uploaded a new version which addresses these: > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 12:22:43PM +0100, Kambiz Darabi wrote: >> > - $ codespell --q

Bug#809308: RFS: cl-asdf/3.1.6 [ITA] - Another System Definition Facility

2015-12-31 Thread Kambiz Darabi
Hello, On 2015-12-29 13:45 CET, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > As I said, the followings are not blocker, but unless you have a (good) > reason for not doing them, I'd prefer to see them fixed/changed. > > * please use short format dh done > * add a Vcs-Browser field done > *

Bug#809308: RFS: cl-asdf/3.1.6 [ITA] - Another System Definition Facility

2015-12-29 Thread Kambiz Darabi
* Fix misplaced fasl cache on Windows. * Miscellaneous bug fixes. * Documentation improvements. Thank you Kambiz Darabi