Bug#385798: openoffice.org: font hinting still does not work with the current version ob libfreetype

2006-09-25 Thread Martin Kretzschmar
On 9/25/06, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Sonntag, 24. September 2006 23:05 schrieb Bernd Schubert: 1.) Quick'n dirty. Simply replace FT_LOAD_TARGET_LIGHT in vcl/source/glyphs/gcach_ftyp.cxx by FT_LOAD_TARGET_NORMAL or FT_LOAD_TARGET_LCD or FT_LOAD_TARGET_LCD_V (if recompiling

Bug#388397: openoffice.org-impress: No text displayed in the Help dialog when OO.o-writer not installed

2006-09-20 Thread Martin Kretzschmar
Makes sense, various sources say that the help uses writer/web for its html display. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377531: openoffice.org-dev: unowinreg.dll should be included

2006-07-12 Thread Martin Kretzschmar
Just trying to get around having to write the makefile patch ;-) However, I am very grateful that you have tried this. Could you please provide a little more details about how did you compile your dll? I'd like to repeat your method and see if I can somehow get it working... Maybe not, I'm

Bug#377531: openoffice.org-dev: unowinreg.dll should be included

2006-07-11 Thread Martin Kretzschmar
Kovacs Baldvin wrote: I seriously consider instead to drop the whole openoffice.org-dev from debian. Not openoffice, just the -dev. Really. If you choose instead dropping that line, then people won't know why on earth does it work differently Then how about not dropping the line, but

Bug#363138: openoffice.org: useless message while starting

2006-04-17 Thread Martin Kretzschmar
On 4/17/06, Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you start OOo in a chroot without /proc mounted you get a --- Warning - OO.o will not work without a mounted /proc filesystem --- Why? That doesnt make sense as OOo works fine without it. IIRC OOo uses (at least 1.1 did) /proc to get its

Bug#345611: openoffice.org: [64bit] Making OpenOffice src compile

2006-01-11 Thread Martin Kretzschmar
On 1/11/06, Emmanuel Fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sincerely, it's not as bad as you said. I did a tour of it yesterday and my desktop didn't burst into fire. :) I found few problems but nothing really lethal until now (I admit I didn't try very deep but I was expecting much worst). Did you

Bug#345611: openoffice.org: [64bit] Making OpenOffice src compile

2006-01-04 Thread Martin Kretzschmar
On 1/4/06, Emmanuel Fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It worked really fine. I've never been so far in the building process ! Here is the next problem I got a missing file (debian/scripts/vars.amd64): If you take a closer look, you will see that there's no such file for any other arch. I guess

Bug#345611: openoffice.org: [64bit] Making OpenOffice src compile

2006-01-03 Thread Martin Kretzschmar
Rene Engelhard wrote: openoffice.org-2.0.1/ooo-build/build/ooa680-m1/svx/source/customshapes/EnhancedCustomShapeFunctionParser.cxx Ah. That again. See the makefile.mk. There are already workarounds there for various other archs/platforms... I've updated the patch that disables

Bug#319369: unmunch not always can extract all words

2005-07-21 Thread Martin Kretzschmar
Hi Davide, Davide Prina schrieb: Package: libmyspell-dev Version: 1:3.1-11 If you are using a MySpell dictionary (.dic) with a word/affix that generate more than 5.000 words than the unmunch utility can generate only the first 5.000 of that. I don't know anything about myspell internals,

Bug#305790: acknowledged by developer (Bug#305790: fixed in djvulibre 3.5.14-4)

2005-04-24 Thread Martin Kretzschmar
Am Samstag, den 23.04.2005, 17:33 -0700 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System: Changes: djvulibre (3.5.14-4) unstable; urgency=low . * generate -dev package again, like pre 3.5.9-5 (closes: #305790) Very cool! Thanks for the quick action. Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#305790: Revive -dev package

2005-04-22 Thread Martin Kretzschmar
Package: djvulibre Version: 3.5.14-2 The evince document viewer for GNOME can be built with djvu-support using libdjvulibre1. However, there's no -dev package for libdjvulibre1, it has been dropped some time ago. Please start building it again. Evince needs the .so symlink and