Bug#929903: openssl: m2crypto test case regression
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior píše v Út 04. 06. 2019 v 23:10 +0200: > It did not if I understand the python correctly: > >with self.assertRaises(RSA.RSAError): > >priv.private_decrypt(ctxt, RSA.sslv23_padding) > > you expect that `priv.private_decrypt()' raised an RSA.RSAError > exception which it did before c (due to that bug) and did not since c. I believe M2Crypto 0.35.1 is what you are looking for. Thank you very much for finding the problem. Best, Matěj -- https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: mc...@ceplovi.cz GPG Finger: 3C76 A027 CA45 AD70 98B5 BC1D 7920 5802 880B C9D8 La vita è una combinazione di magia e pasta. -- Federico Fellini signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#929903: openssl: m2crypto test case regression
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior píše v Út 04. 06. 2019 v 14:15 +0200: > Let me ping upstream: Matěj, could you please take a look at > https://bugs.debian.org/929903 Also, the upstream bug for this is https://gitlab.com/m2crypto/m2crypto/issues/258 Best, Matěj -- https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: mc...@ceplovi.cz GPG Finger: 3C76 A027 CA45 AD70 98B5 BC1D 7920 5802 880B C9D8 - Do you think of yourself as a Christian artist? - I'm an artist who is a Christian. I'm not a Christian artist. -- Johny Cash in his last interview signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#929903: openssl: m2crypto test case regression
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior píše v Út 04. 06. 2019 v 14:15 +0200: > Let me ping upstream: Matěj, could you please take a look at > https://bugs.debian.org/929903 > > and check if it is okay the test no longer fails or if openssl suddenly > eats up the error code. Afterall: OK, I have this commit now in the master https://gitlab.com/m2crypto/m2crypto/commit/f287d7145b5f but I am still not certain that sslv23_padding and especially no_padding should lead to error, shouldn't it? Why did the test passed before otherwise? Best, Matěj > --- tests/test_rsa.py 2019-06-03 21:16:33.84000 + > +++ tests/test_rsa.py.new 2019-06-04 12:14:21.16800 + > @@ -124,10 +124,10 @@ > > # sslv23_padding > ctxt = priv.public_encrypt(self.data, RSA.sslv23_padding) > -with self.assertRaises(RSA.RSAError): > -priv.private_decrypt(ctxt, RSA.sslv23_padding) > -with self.assertRaises(RSA.RSAError): > -priv.private_decrypt(ctxt, RSA.sslv23_padding) > +ptxt = priv.private_decrypt(ctxt, RSA.sslv23_padding) > +self.assertEqual(ptxt, self.data) > +ptxt = priv.private_decrypt(ctxt, RSA.sslv23_padding) > +self.assertEqual(ptxt, self.data) > > # no_padding > with self.assertRaises(RSA.RSAError): > > passes now and the result is `equal'. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#923446: m2crypto: autopkgtest with new version of openssl: Connection refused
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior píše v So 02. 03. 2019 v 17:16 +0100: > The thing is that m2ctypto uses TLS1.3 cipher but uses the -cipher > option instead of -ciphersuites which is for TLS1.3: > > $ openssl s_server --help 2>&1 |grep -- -cipher > > -cipher valSpecify TLSv1.2 and below cipher list to be used > > -ciphersuites val Specify TLSv1.3 ciphersuites to be used > > The patch attached against m2crypto fixes the testsuite issue. Thank you, merged in https://gitlab.com/m2crypto/m2crypto/merge_requests/224 Matěj -- https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: mc...@ceplovi.cz GPG Finger: 3C76 A027 CA45 AD70 98B5 BC1D 7920 5802 880B C9D8 I would like to die sleeping, like my father — rather than screaming and helpless, like his passengers. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#643680: Could I ask for a reproducer?
Hi, this is your happy upstream maintainer of M2Crypto. I tried to reproduce this bug here, but I have failed so far. Could you be so kind and and provide some complete standalone testing script together with all data files (certificates, etc.) needed for the reproduction, please? If I can reproduce the problem, I will gladly try to fix it. Thank you for reporting this, Matěj Cepl signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#631806: This is almost certainly obsolete
I cannot reproduce this even with python-m2crypto in Debian/stretch (that's 0.24.0 from 2016-03-21). The last version where I could reproduce it is on my RHEL-7 (0.21.1 from 2011-01- 15). If you can reproduce the bug with version of M2Crypto more recent than the last year, I would be interested in the bug report upstream (https://gitlab.com/m2crypto/m2crypto/issues/new ). Thank you, Matěj
Bug#717675: This has been fixed upstream
This has been already fixed by the upstream commit 79032181 in the release 0.26.0 from 2017-03-25. Happy hacking! Matěj signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#859225: M2Crypto na OpenSSL 1.1.0
Just to say, that M2Crypto since 0.26.2 (current release is 0.27.0) officially supports OpenSSL 1.1.0 API, no compat- libraries are needed anymore. Best, Matěj Cepl (upstream maintainer of M2Crypto) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#774486: pyg: There is now new upstream
Package: pyg Version: 0.9.7+b2 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I have uploaded a new (hopefully more sane) version of the package to PIP and I intent to maintain it there. The URL is https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pygn (unfortunately, pyg name has been already taken by a now dead package). -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.7 APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages pyg depends on: ii libc6 2.13-38+deb7u6 ii python 2.7.3-4+deb7u1 ii python-support 1.0.15 pyg recommends no packages. Versions of packages pyg suggests: ii exim4-daemon-light [mail-transport-agent] 4.80-7+deb7u1 pn news-transport-system none ii procmail 3.22-20+deb7u1 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#641925: vimoutliner: New upstreams available
Package: vim-vimoutliner Version: 0.3.4+pristine-9.1 Followup-For: Bug #641925 Dear Maintainer, there is actually 0.3.6 now upstream. Also, what do you mean by the binary stuff? Also, please, change the upstream URL in description to either https://github.com/vimoutliner/vimoutliner or to http://vimoutliner.cepl.eu -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.7 APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages vim-vimoutliner depends on: ii libpalm-perl1:1.012-1 ii libxml-writer-perl 0.615-1 ii perl5.14.2-21+deb7u2 ii python 2.7.3-4+deb7u1 ii vim 2:7.3.547-7 ii vim-nox [vim] 2:7.3.547-7 Versions of packages vim-vimoutliner recommends: ii vim-addon-manager 0.5.2 vim-vimoutliner suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#641925: vimoutliner: New upstreams available
Package: vim-vimoutliner Version: 0.3.4+pristine-9.1 Followup-For: Bug #641925 Dear Maintainer, there is actually 0.3.6 now upstream. Also, what do you mean by the binary stuff? Also, please, change the upstream URL in description to either https://github.com/vimoutliner/vimoutliner or to http://vimoutliner.cepl.eu -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.7 APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages vim-vimoutliner depends on: ii libpalm-perl1:1.012-1 ii libxml-writer-perl 0.615-1 ii perl5.14.2-21+deb7u2 ii python 2.7.3-4+deb7u1 ii vim 2:7.3.547-7 ii vim-nox [vim] 2:7.3.547-7 Versions of packages vim-vimoutliner recommends: ii vim-addon-manager 0.5.2 vim-vimoutliner suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#557432: We have it building!
After spending some time fixing builds on Fedora, I took a view over the fence, and found this bug. Maybe trying our patches (at http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ucblogo.git/tree/ ) could help? Best, Matěj -- http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mc...@ceplovi.cz GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC My life has been full of terrible misfortunes most of which never happened. -- Michel de Montaigne signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#439440: Close bug
It seems to me that the maintainer forgot to close this bug. Patch has been already applied, it seems. Best, Matěj Cepl signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#464531: There is new upstream
Oh well, I hoped that Debian will be (as usual) source of already made pacages even in this case, but apparently note. So, OK just to note that there is now new upstream for jingle/trang/etc. which should be also upgraded to work with the latest Java. http://code.google.com/p/jing-trang/ Matěj Cepl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
